International Trade and Globalization Impacts on Scale, Distribution, Efficiency and Democracy China’s Arms Industry Makes Global Inroads ‘Airpocalypse’ Hits Harbin, Closing Schools A Wave of Sewing Jobs as Orders Pile Up What is Globalization? The integration of all national economies into one global market, with one set of rules Global market takes precedence over national autonomy Supporting institutions are IMF, World Bank, World Trade Organization (WTO), NAFTA, etc. What’s a legitimate alternative? Article Barriers to Change, From Wall St. and Geneva According to the W.T.O., 125 of its 153 member countries have made varying degrees of commitments to the financial services agreement. Now, these pledges could easily be used to undermine new rules intended to make financial systems safer. What are it’s defining characteristics? Economic growth (increasing material consumption) as sole desirable end Privatization and commodification of public services, national and global commons Corporate deregulation and unrestricted movement of capital across borders Increased corporate concentration Cultural and economic homogenization The Theory Behind International Trade Comparative advantage One country can be more efficient at producing everything than another country, and still benefit from trade with the inefficient country Assumes that trade must be advantageous or else countries would not participate. Numerical example NO TRADE Phil Indonesia Total output fish 2 pesos 2 rupiah 2F clothes Total resources 1 peso 3 pesos 4 rupiah 6 rupiah 2C TRADE fish Phil Indonesia Total output 6 rupiah 3 F clothes Total resources 3 pesos 3 pesos 3C 6 rupiah 1 rupiah = 5 pesos: Philippines has absolute advantage Impacts of comparative advantage More total output and freedom of choice in consumption More specialization, and less freedom of choice in production Is consumption only desirable end, or does choice of career matter? Some sectors/regions within a country will lose out (but winners can compensate losers) Articles How Convincing Is the Case for Free Trade? “one of the economic profession’s intellectual triumphs: the theory that every country gains by unfettered international trade.” “Relative to a status quo of no or limited international trade, permitting full free trade across borders will leave in its wake some immediate losers, but citizens who gain from such trade gain much more than the losers lose. On a net basis, therefore, each nation gains over all from such trade.” Articles Report Lays Out State’s Great Gains and Losses From Globalization But the costs and benefits of globalization have spread unevenly across the state, with New York City and its suburbs reaping most of the rewards and some regions of the state failing to adapt to the onslaught of competition, according to the report, from the SUNY Levin Institute in Manhattan. Even within the city, though, most workers have fallen behind as the wages of low-skilled jobs have not kept pace with the cost of living. Let’s Admit It: Globalization Has Losers FOR the typical American, the past decade has been economically brutal: the first time since the 1930s, according to some calculations, that inflation-adjusted incomes declined. By 2010, real median household income had fallen to $49,445, compared with $53,164 in 2000. While there are many culprits, from declining unionization to the changing mix of needed skills, globalization has had the greatest impact. A typical General Motors worker costs the company about $56 per hour, which includes benefits. In Mexico, a worker costs the company $7 per hour; in China, $4.50 an hour, and in India, $1 per hour. While G.M. doesn’t (yet) achieve United States-level productivity in China and India, its Mexican plants are today at least as efficient as those in the United States. Articles Standard of Living Is in the Shadows as Election Issue At the top of the list are the digital revolution, which has allowed machines to replace many forms of human labor, and the modern wave of globalization, which has allowed millions of low-wage workers around the world to begin competing with Americans. One of the more striking recent developments in economics has been economists’ growing acceptance of the idea that globalization has held down pay for a large swath of workers. The public has long accepted the idea, but economists resisted it, pointing to the long-term benefits of trade. “That is starting to change only in the face of very strong evidence over the past decade,” said Edward Alden of the Council on Foreign Relations. Global Markets are good for everyone Markets will end poverty “The real losers in Seattle” Markets will solve environmental problems Environmental Kuznet’s curve Population growth and poverty Economic growth is essential Humans are insatiable “The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth” (B. Friedman) Comparative or Absolute Advantage? What if capital can flow between countries? Numerical example No capital flows Phil fish Indonesia Total output 6 rupiah 3F clothes 3 pesos 3C Total resources 3 pesos 6 rupiah Capital flows Phil Indonesia fish 22 pesos 11 F clothes 11 peso 11 C Total resources 33 pesos 1 rupiah = 5 pesos Total output Absolute advantage There will be more fish and clothes What about employment in Indonesia? Can people flow across borders? Is efficient economic production all that matters? Can winners compensate losers? If trade is voluntary, how could this happen? "It is a very common clever device that when anyone has attained the summit of greatness, he kicks away the ladder by which he has cllimbed up, in order to deprive others of the means of climbing up after him…Any nation which by means of protective duties and restrictions on navigation has raised her manufacturing power and her navigation to such a degree of development that no other nation can sustain free competition with her, can do nothing wiser than to throw away these ladders of her greatness, to preach to other nations the benefits of free trade, and to declare in penitent tones that she has hitherto wandered in the paths of error, and has now for the first time succeeded in discovering the truth." -Friedrich List, 1885 (German economist known as father of modern 'infant industry' theory "For centuries England has relied on protection, has carried it to extremes and has obtained satisfactory results from it. there is no doubt that it is to this system that it owes its present strength. After two centuries, England has found it convenient to adopt free trade because it thinks that protection can no longer offer it anything. Very well then, gentlemen, my knowledge of our country leads me to believe that within 200 years, when America has gotten out of protection all that it can offer, it too will adopt free trade" -Ulysses S. Grant What empirical results would we expect under absolute advantage? Rich get richer, poor get poorer Headlines: Number of Hungry Rising, U.N. Says By ELIZABETH BECKER Published: December 8, 2004 Number of hungry and number of poor at record levels (though not when measured in percentage terms, especially if we include China) Income of poorest countries is falling (World Bank statistics) Richest countries accumulating greatest share of new wealth 1% of GNP growth in US = GNP of 24 poorest nations IMF Working Paper: Rising Income Inequality: Technology, or Trade and Financial Globalization? “The limited overall impact of globalization reflects two offsetting tendencies: whereas trade globalization is associated with a reduction in inequality, financial globalization —and foreign direct investment in particular — is associated with an increase.” How does a country get an absolute advantage? Race to the bottom We would expect the countries with the lowest wages and most lax environmental standards to exhibit economic growth and atrocious environmental degradation Headline 9/1/2004: Rivers Run Black, and Chinese Die of Cancer By JIM YARDLEY, NYT How does a country develop domestic markets for domestic production? Environment Wages Unavoidable Environmental Costs of Trade • Transportation – Global warming – Oceanic pollution – Dependence on fossil fuels • Spread of weed species (especially aquatic) – Asian longhorn beetle – San Francisco Bay – Salmon bacteria