International Trade, Globalization and Financial Crisis Impacts on Scale, Distribution, Efficiency and Democracy What is Globalization? The integration of all national economies into one global market, with one set of rules Global market takes precedence over national autonomy Supporting institutions are IMF, World Bank, World Trade Organization (WTO), NAFTA, etc. What’s a legitimate alternative? What are it’s defining characteristics? Economic growth (increasing material consumption) as sole desirable end Privatization and commodification of public services, national and global commons Corporate deregulation and unrestricted movement of capital across borders Increased corporate concentration Cultural and economic homogenization What has been the impact of Globalization on: Ecological sustainability Distribution of wealth and income Economic output Economic stability Democracy The allocation of scarce resources towards an improved quality of life for all people The Theory Behind International Trade Comparative advantage One country can be more efficient at producing everything than another country, and still benefit from trade with the inefficient country Assumes that trade must be advantageous or else countries would not participate. Numerical example NO TRADE Phil Indonesia Total output fish 2 pesos 2 rupiah 2F clothes Total resources 1 peso 3 pesos 4 rupiah 6 rupiah 2C TRADE fish Phil Indonesia Total output 6 rupiah 3 F clothes Total resources 3 pesos 3 pesos 3C 6 rupiah 1 rupiah = 5 pesos: Philippines has absolute advantage Impacts of comparative advantage More total output and freedom of choice in consumption More specialization, and less freedom of choice in production (but only desirable end is consumption) Some sectors/regions within a country will lose out (but winners can compensate losers) Global Markets are good for everyone Markets will end poverty “The real losers in Seattle” Markets will solve environmental problems Environmental Kuznet’s curve Population growth and poverty Economic growth is essential Humans are insatiable “The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth” (B. Friedman) Protectionism & ‘beggar thy neighbor’ Comparative or Absolute Advantage? What if capital can flow between countries? Indonesian capitalists will produce fish and clothes in the Philippines Numerical example No capital flows Phil fish Indonesia Total output 6 rupiah 3F clothes 3 pesos 3C Total resources 3 pesos 6 rupiah Capital flows Phil Indonesia fish 22 pesos 11 F clothes 11 peso 11 C Total resources 33 pesos 1 rupiah = 5 pesos Total output Absolute advantage There will be more fish and clothes What about employment in Indonesia? Can people flow across borders? Is efficient economic production all that matters? Can winners compensate losers? If trade is voluntary, how could this happen? e.g. Toxic waste in Abidjan The Facts Behind Globalization What empirical results would we expect under absolute advantage? Rich get richer, poor get poorer Headlines: Number of Hungry Rising, U.N. Says By ELIZABETH BECKER Published: December 8, 2004 Number of hungry and number of poor at record levels (though not when measured in percentage terms, especially if we include China) Income of poorest countries is falling (World Bank statistics) Richest countries accumulating greatest share of new wealth 1% of GNP growth in US = GNP of 24 poorest nations How does a country get an absolute advantage? Race to the bottom We would expect the countries with the lowest wages and most lax environmental standards to exhibit economic growth and atrocious environmental degradation Headline 9/1/2004: Rivers Run Black, and Chinese Die of Cancer By JIM YARDLEY, NYT How does a country develop domestic markets for domestic production? Environment Wages—Mexican wages 11% of US wages Unavoidable Environmental Costs of Trade • Transportation – Global warming – Oceanic pollution – Dependence on fossil fuels • Spread of weed species (especially aquatic) – Asian longhorn beetle – San Francisco Bay – Salmon bacteria NAFTA and the Environment Environmental side agreement Environmental Kuznets Curve Actual results in Mexico from 1985-1999 Gallagher, GDAE Rural erosion increased 89% as small farmers cultivated more in response to decreasing prices Municipal solid waste increased 108% Water pollution—29% Urban air pollution—97% NAFTA and the Environment Chapter 11 Metalclad corporation Toxic dump site or natural protected area? MTBE, MME WTO similar Turtle excluder devices Marine mammal protection act NAFTA and the Environment Growing corn exports from US NAFTA and Distribution Who are poorest in Mexico? 22% of Mexico's labor force in small ag. What do we export to Mexico? Corn prices dropped 45% in Mexico (US subsidies average $20,000/farmer/year) Tortilla prices increased in Mexico Mexican farmers produced more, not less What does Mexico export to US? What’s the impact on unions, wages? NAFTA and Distribution Significant decline in real wages in Mexico (minimum wage down 23% under NAFTA) Number of households in poverty increased 80% between 1984-1999, 75% living in poverty Over half of rural Mexico in extreme poverty Record increase in number of billionaires NAFTA and Efficiency Exports up in Mexico, but imports up by more Rate of growth less than 1% per capita per year (1985-1999) vs. 3.4% under import substitution industrialization. NAFTA and Efficiency Environmental impacts: Financial costs of degradation from 1988-1999 10% of GDP ($36 billion/yr) Gallagher, GDAE Economic growth $14 billion/yr Distributional impacts Law of diminishing marginal utility Announcements 4 groups turned in PS5, all have received comments Remaining groups should consider themselves to be failing the class currently. I have no qualms about giving failing grades. Make an appointment to meet with me if you need to. Participation counts. Many of you are earning failing grades on participation: skipping class, not contributing in class=F Don’t skip class on Thursday Globalization and Stability: Financial contagion What is contagion? Speculative flows 2 trillion per day, vs. ~$36 Trillion global GNP What does speculation contribute to economic output? “Speculators are harmless as bubbles on a steady stream of enterprise. But the position is serious if enterprise becomes a bubble on the whirlpool of speculation. When the capital development of a country becomes the by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done.” John Maynard Keynes Causes of Financial Meltdowns Speculative bubbles Moral hazard “Fundamentals” wrong High current account deficits Excessive money creation NYT Headlines: Fed Plans to Inject Another $1 Trillion to Aid the Economy Overvalued exchange rates Relative to what? Causes of Contagion Freedom of capital to go where it wants ‘Hot’ money Imperfect information Herd behavior, animal spirits, Reflexivity Positive feedback loops and multiple equilibria Selling short Examples of Contagion LA debt crisis (1982) ISI and the energy crunch Petro-dollars Reagonomics Capital flight, exchange rate depreciation Switch from ISI to Export promotion, implementation of Washington Consensus “The lost decade” Tequila crisis (1994) Clinton’s comments Uprising and assassination Political uncertainty Tesobonos Capital flight and devaluation Asian flu (1997) Real estate bubble Financial speculation, Soros and devaluation Impacts of devaluation on debt Impacts on trade competitors IMF role: interest rates, taxes, government spending, bailouts Malaysia’s response Impacts on Democracy Structural adjustment programs Brazil’s elections Current Crisis Origins Dot.com bust real estate boom Exotic derivatives and imperfect information Financial speculation From liquidity crisis to liquidity surplus Contagion Policy Options Tobin Tax Speculation tax Restricting capital flows Higher marginal tax brackets and more equitable distribution