The 2011 AFI Global Policy Forum Consumer Empowerment and Market Conduct (CEMC) working group meeting 27 September, Riviera Maya, Mexico The CEMC WG from Malaysia to Mexico > 18 member organizations established CEMC WG > Set objective > Identified 4 priority areas > Agreed on content for charter and concept note > Agreed to undertake member survey > Set up coordination group > Agreed on content for work plan > Charter and concept note drafted > Survey undertaken > Coordination group functioning > 18 member organizations represented in the second meeting > CEMC is activated > The CEMC WG has a logo > and a work space: AFI Member Zone Launch: KL, 7 April 2011 Second meeting: RM, 27 Sept 2011 28 AFI members represented in the CEMC WG > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Banco Central del Paraguay Banco Central do Brasil Banco Nacional de Angola Bank al-Maghrib Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas BCEAO Bank Indonesia Bank Negara Malaysia Bank of Thailand Bank of Uganda Bank of Zambia Banque Centrale de la Rép. de Guinée Banque Centrale du Congo Central Bank of Armenia Central Bank of Kenya Central Bank of Liberia > Central Bank of Tanzania > CNBV, Mexico > Ministère de l’Economie et des Finances du Senegal > Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, Russia > National Bank of Rwanda > National Credit Regulator, South Africa > Palestine Monetary Authority > People’s Bank of China > Reserve Bank of Malawi > State Bank of Pakistan > Superintendencia de Peru > Superintendencia de Guatemala New members in yellow/green Agenda Time Item for discussion Welcoming remarks and meeting kick-off 9.00 – 9.30 9.30 – 10.30 Review of the agenda and meeting goals Review of preparatory documents Updating each other on country initiatives CEMC WG members survey Presentation and discussion of intermediate results of the CEMC WG survey 10.30 – 11.00 Coffee break The G20 High-level Principles on Financial Consumer Protection and their implementation 11.00 - 12.00 Discussion of impact of the Principles on the work of the CEMC WG members and the possible role of the CEMC in their implementation Election of CEMC WG chairperson (and eventually a co-chair) Announcement of new chairperson Discussion and approval of CEMC WG seminal documents (concept note and charter) Governance 12.00 – 12.30 12.30 – 12.45 Presentation of CEMC WG sessions at 2011 AFI GPF Relevance of the sessions and role of CEMC WG members 12.45 – 14.00 Lunch Agenda setting and operazionalization 14.00 – 15.00 14.00 – 15.45 Presentation of proposed log-frame Discussion of the CEMC WG expected outcomes and outputs Creation of subgroups Sub-groups discussions 15.45 – 16.00 Coffee break Next steps 16.00 – 17.00 Closing Finalization of log-frame Finalization of work plan (division of labor between subgroups, participation in relevant events, etc.) Agenda and logistic for the next meeting Priority areas MARKET CONDUCT > i) transparency and disclosure > ii) sales and marketing practices CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT > iii) avenues for help and redress > iv) financial literacy, capability and awareness CEMC WG’s objectives > To promote the adoption of evidence based policy and regulatory solutions for the empowerment and protection of financial consumers, which is also correlated with improving access to finance and the quality of financial inclusion > To develop a set of core principles/guidelines for financial consumer empowerment and protection policymaking > To support the design and validation of tools for policy analysis and policymaking for use by working group members Meeting goals > To present the preliminary results of the members’ survey and agree on the next steps > To discuss the potential role in the implementation of the G20 Principles > To elect the chairperson > To approve the charter and concept note > To find agreement on the expected outcome and outputs > To establish subgroups > To design the CEMC WG’s log-frame > To revise the work plan Preparatory documents > First meeting minutes and list of participants > Second meeting agenda > Second meeting participants list > Consolidated results of CEMC WG survey > Draft CEMC WG concept note > Draft CEC WG charter > Draft G20 High-level principles on financial consumer protection Members’ update > Central Bank of Uganda visited Mexico and Peru and released new National Framework on Financial Literacy and Financial Consumer Protection > Koid Swee Lian, AFI Policy Champion and CEMC WG founder, appointed CEO of the Malaysia AKPK > Others? Session I CEMC WG members survey Preliminary results > Scope of the analysis > Survey objectives > Respondent demographics > Preliminary results and observations > Survey trends > Roadmap to good policy practices CEMC WG survey: scope of the analysis Good policy practices Gather respective market data Self-diagnose priority policy objectives Survey peers to determine common practices and challenges Measure impact of policies and regulations on market and consumers CEMC WG survey: objectives > To gain a better understanding of WG members experiences, current plans, and challenges ahead related to the WG’s four priority areas > To provide a foundation from which WG members can self-diagnose their respective policy approaches, to determine how to best enable safe and sustainable policy and regulatory frameworks for financial inclusion > To inform the development of a road map towards good policy practice for consumer empowerment and market conduct CEMC WG survey: respondents demographics Africa Angola BCEAO RD Congo Kenya Malawi Senegal Uganda Zambia Guatemala Mexico Total Paraguay Peru Palestine Armenia China Philippines 17 LAC MENA ECA Russia 17 countries 11 central banks 3 3 banks ministries regulators 2 billion people NUMBER OF AGENCIES WITH RESPONSIBILITY CEMC WG survey: demographics > 45 (average 2.6 per country) > Mostly central banks and ministries, but also capital market authorities, insurance authorities, consumer protection agencies, and few microfinance authorities Responding Country Agency 1 Agency 2 Angola Banco Nacional de Angola China DR Congo Guatemala Kenya Malawi Mexico Instituto Nacional de Defesa do Consumidor (INADEC) State Administration for Industry &Commerce Banque Centrale du Congo Dirección de protección al consumidor (Ministerio de Economía) Central Bank of Kenya Capital Markets Authority Agency 3 Agency 4 Retirement Benefits Authority Insurance Regulatory Authority Reserve Bank of Malawi Central Bank (BANCO DE MEXICO) Palestine Paraguay Peru Palestine Monetary Authority Philippines Republic of Armenia Russian Federation Senegal Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas National Banking and Securities Commission National Commission for the Protection of (CNBV) Users of Financial Services (CONDUSEF) Banco Central del Paraguay Instituto Nacional de Cooperativismo Ministerio de Industria y Comercio Department of Products and Services to National Institute for the Defense of Competition and Intellectual Property Protection (Indecopi) Securities and Exchange Commission Financial Ombudsman Service Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation Insurance and Surety National Commission (CNSF) / Institute for the Protection of Banking Savings (IPAB) Insurance Commission Central Bank of Armenia Federal Service on Consumers' Rights Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation Ministry for Economic Development of the Russian Federation Federal Financial Markets Service Direction de la microfinance (DMF) Banque Centrale des Etats de l'Afrique de l'Ouest (BCEAO) Observatoire de la Qualité des Services Financiers (OQSF) Uganda Direction de la Réglementation et de la supervision des systèmes financiers décentralisés (DRS-SFD) Bank of Uganda Capital Markets Authority Uganda Insurance Commission Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Department of Microfinance WAEMU - UEMOA Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Banking Commission Zambia Bank of Zambia Pensions and Insurance Authority Microfinance Departments of Ministers of Finances Securities and Exchange Commission Competition and Consumer Protection Commission CEMC WG survey: categories INSTITUTIONAL LANDSCAPE > Mandate > Interagency coordination > Consultative approach MARKET CONDUCT > Regulation > Oversight > Remedial actions > Enforcement > Self-regulation > Transparency and disclosure > Sale and market practices > Ancillary areas CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT > Avenues for help and redress > Financial literacy, capability and awareness MANDATE – MARKET CONDUCT What are the main functions of the agencies? Most commonly, the involved agencies cover the three functions: regulating, supervising, and enforcing market conduct regulation Often the legal basis is the central bank law and the banking law. In a few cases the mandate is embedded in the constitution MANDATE – CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT What are the main functions of the agencies? Agencies answer consumer queries and often play a role in delivering programs to increase consumer’s awareness. Debt counseling is commonly left to specific agencies. PARTICIPATIVE APPROACH Do advocacy groups have a formal role? In designing and implementing consumer empowerment policies and market conduct regs Financial education Consumer advocacy organisations play a fairly limited role in the policymaking and regulatory process. In nearly 50% of the countries, consultation with consumer advocacy groups play no role. Only in two countries the advocacy groups have a further role helping consumers to file complains. In less than 30% of the countries they have any formal roles, responsibilities, or duties related to consumer education LANDSCAPE The two main weaknesses and priorities over the next year The assessed primary weaknesses in the financial sector are overwhelmingly: - the limited access to (formal) financial products; and - the low level of financial literacy. This doesn't imply that each area not flagged by a country is necessarily fully satisfactory. In terms of priorities, the dominant priority is to increase financial literacy. The second is to increase protection for bank clients (only ½ the level of support as for financial literacy). MARKET CONDUCT – LEGAL BASIS What legal documents govern market conduct regulation? Relevant legal provisions are most often found in either general consumer protection legislation or in financial sector regulations. Market conduct provisions are diffused in multiple laws. Most countries do not have specific legislation for financial consumer protection. Combining these answers with other questions, likely other legal acts (on payment systems, credit bureaus, insurance, pensions, and securities) may include market conduct provisions; and these laws often contain conflicting provisions. MARKET CONDUCT Which products and providers are covered? Formal lenders and deposit takers are likely to be regulated. Not the market of mobile financial services. Why? Hypothesis: a) it’s less risky b) it’s too new – there is no sectoral regulation MARKET CONDUCT Which areas are covered? The focus of market conduct regulations is on disclosure of the cost of financial services. A minority of countries also provide for complaints handling and redress mechanisms and for disclosure in advertising. However, almost all areas are covered, so there are a number of members from whom lessons can potentially be learned. MARKET CONDUCT – OVERSIGHT What market conduct oversight activities can be undertaken? Limited use of specific market conduct oversight techniques such as media monitoring and mystery shopping. Why? MARKET CONDUCT – OVERSIGHT Number of inspections conducted in one year In-site Although on- and off-site inspections are the primary compliance monitoring tools, 65% of countries does not have a specific audit or inspection programme for consumer protection monitoring. This may be an area where substantial improvement can be made in the short term. Off-site Is there a specific checklist or auditing program that focuses on consumer protection issues? MARKET CONDUCT – OVERSIGHT Dedicated staff Are there dedicated staff responsible for market conduct supervision at any of the agencies you identified in question 1? In half of the countries the answer is positive Is market conduct supervision a general duty of supervisory staff (e.g. banking department) in the course of normal inspections? In more than 80% of the countries, yes. This could be a point of consensus in making future recommendations (w development of adequate tools) MARKET CONDUCT – REMEDIAL AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS What is the nature of the enforcement action? In most countries, remedial action on consumer protection issues is limited to letters of warning, although 65% of countries does have the power to issue monetary fines for noncompliance. Number of times this action of this type was taken in 2010 Your answers seem to indicate that 55% of the countries have issued between 1 and 5 fines for market conduct compliance Surprisingly high MARKET CONDUCT – SELF-REGULATION Standards/codes of conduct Are there industry codes of conduct in your country which identify specific market conduct standards? If so, has the regulator endorsed the code of conduct? And, is there a self-regulatory body (or bodies) that is responsible for enforcing of the standards? The majority of the countries have codes of conduct. In those cases, the regulators has often endorsed the code, which is enforced by a thirdparty. MARKET CONDUCT – SELF-REGULATION Standards/codes of conduct The codes of conducts probably refer mostly to banking codes of conduct (followed by insurance). It seems that the codes mostly deal only with generic issues, and not with specific consumer protection issues. Which products/services are covered? What areas are covered? What providers are required to comply? What types of providers have to comply with the standards or codes of conduct? MARKET CONDUCT – PRICING, TRANSPARENCY & DISCLOSURE Does your country have transparency & disclosure regulations? Does your country have transparency and disclosure regulations? Is a specific format mandated for loan documentation? Is there a standard template for either the disclosures or the contract that is endorsed by the regulator? Most countries do have some form of transparency regulation, mostly focused on interest or cost calculation. However, there is no uniform approach in calculating the cost of credit (see next slide) Only a minority of countries have a requirement for standard pre-agreement disclosure for financial service contracts. This may require attention in conforming to the G20 principles. MARKET CONDUCT – PRICING Price calculation formula mandated for credit products What specific charges and fees are included in the formula? MARKET CONDUCT – TRANSPARENCY & DISCLOSURE - DEPOSIT AND SAVINGS PRODUCTS What information is required to be disclosed to the client? (Before Sale *) MARKET CONDUCT – TRANSPARENCY & DISCLOSURE – CREDIT PRODUCTS What information is required to be disclosed to the client? (Before Sale *) MARKET CONDUCT – TRANSPARENCY & DISCLOSURE – MONEY TRANSFERS What information is required to be disclosed to the client? (Before Sale *) MARKET CONDUCT – TRANSPARENCY & DISCLOSURE – PAYMENT SERVICES What information is required to be disclosed to the client? (Before Sale *) MARKET CONDUCT – TRANSPARENCY & DISCLOSURE – E-MONEY What information is required to be disclosed to the client? (Before Sale *) MARKET CONDUCT – PRICING AND TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF COMPARABLE PRODUCTS/PROVIDERS Is the information provided to consumers? Around 50% of countries publish some comparative information on the pricing or terms and conditions of financial services. This is mostly published in the central bank website. If yes, where? If it is recognized the importance of this information for customers, how to make it available to the majority of the clients? MARKET CONDUCT – TRANSPARENCY AND DISCLOSURE Continuing information to customers Is the provider required to provide periodic information to the client regarding their deposits/savings? If yes, what is the due communication? Around 75% of countries require periodic disclosure of information on deposit or savings accounts, mostly through disclosure in account statement MARKET CONDUCT – TRANSPARENCY & DISCLOSURE What are two main priorities for the next year? 53% To ensure transparency and effective disclosure in transactions with banks 29% To identify cost-effective tools to provide to the public information on pricing and terms and conditions of comparable products/providers MARKET CONDUCT – SALES AND MARKETING PRACTICES Is there any regulations for sales and marketing practices? More than 40% of countries have no regulation on sales and marketing practices. MARKET CONDUCT – SALES AND MARKETING PRACTICES What conducts and providers are regulated? Restrictions to prevent personal data related to a consumer from being shared with external parties Obligation to verify credit history of consumer before selling a credit product Obligation to verify repayment capacity of the consumer before selling a credit product Prohibition of unfair, deceptive or aggressive practices Suitability of products and services for the consumer Prohibition on reckless lending It seems that banks and NBFIs covered similarly MARKET CONDUCT – SALES AND MARKETING PRACTICES Is there any regulatory provision that mandates the provider: To train staff on responsible sales practices To supervise staff on responsible sales practices To what providers does this apply? MARKET CONDUCT – SALES AND MARKETING PRACTICES The two main priorities for the next year Suitability of products and services for the consumer Obligation to verify repayment capacity of the consumer before selling a credit product Obligation to verify credit history of consumer before selling a credit product MARKET CONDUCT – ANCILLARY AREAS Credit bureaus Credit information sharing and credit bureaus: Describe the nature of credit information sharing, in relation to the statements below. Many countries have implemented credit information sharing initiatives, although participation is mostly limited to banks. In most cases MFIs are not included in the credit bureau system (see next). MARKET CONDUCT – ANCILLARY AREAS Credit bureaus For "These institutions report information to the credit bureau", please select : For "These institutions have access to the collected information", please select : MARKET CONDUCT – ANCILLARY AREAS Abusive clauses Abusive clauses: Is there any clause, term, or condition that, if inserted in a contract, is automatically considered void or “deemed unwritten”? Only a minority of countries have any specific limitations on unfair contract terms. This may be an area where significant improvement is possible. MARKET CONDUCT The main priorities for the next year In your country, what are the four main priorities for the next year for enhancing market conduct policy and regulatory framework? Please select up to four priorities, with 1 being the highest priority. CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT Complaint handling and redress mechanisms Do consumers have access to affordable and efficient complaint handling and redress mechanisms in your country? Is the access to affordable and efficient complaint handling and redress mechanisms a statutory right in your country? CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT Complaint handling and redress mechanisms For each of the help and redress mechanisms listed in the table below, indicate whether a solution is in place. CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT Complaint handling and redress mechanisms What types of clients can file a complaint? CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT Complaint handling and redress mechanisms The decisions of the regulators and/or ombudsmen binding upon CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT - DEBT COUNSELING Is there any agency that offers debt counseling? CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT Complaint handling and redress mechanisms In your country, what are two main priorities for the next to provide consumers access to affordable and efficient complaint handling and redress mechanisms? Please select up to two priorities. CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT Strategies, mandates, and tools for financial literacy Is there a national strategy to enhance the financial literacy, capability and awareness of consumers? Does the regulator have a statutory responsibility to promote consumer literacy, capability and awareness with respect to financial services? Does the regulator undertakes programmes to promote consumer literacy, capability and awareness with respect to financial services? Is there a special unit or dedicated staff responsible for financial consumers’ literacy, capability, and awareness? CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT Strategies, mandates, and tools for financial literacy Please indicate whether any of the following instruments are used to promote financial consumer literacy, capability and awareness by the financial sector regulator or another government agency: Please indicate whether any of the following instruments are used to promote financial consumer literacy, capability and awareness by the financial institutions: CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT Strategies, mandates, and tools for financial literacy Has the level of financial literacy in your country been formally measured? CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT – STRATEGIES, MANDATES, and TOOLS Do financial consumers’ literacy, capability, and awareness programs target unbanked or low-income people? MARKET CONDUCT Has your institution ever evaluated the effectiveness of its financial literacy, capability, and awareness initiatives? CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT Strategies, mandates, and tools for financial literacy What constraints and limitations keep your institution from promoting financial literacy, capability, and awareness? CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT Strategies, mandates, and tools for financial literacy Over the next year, what are the main priorities for your country in reference to financial consumers’ literacy, capability and awareness? CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT Strategies, mandates, and tools for financial literacy > No clear mandate > A few countries have clear strategies > But you all are doing that! > Without a baseline > Using different tools, implementing many different projects > But without knowing their effectiveness > With lack of financial resources (for the reasons above?) > And scarce collaboration with private sector and advocates groups Session II G20 High-level principles on financial consumer protection > Impact on CEMC WG members > Possible role of the CEMC WG in the implementation of the principles Purpose of the session Present > Overview of the G20 Principles on Financial Consumer Protection Comment from members of the Working Group > Any areas of the G20 Principles which may be difficult to implement; > or is inconsistent with reality in particular countries; > or is silent on an aspect of consumer protection which is a pressing concern? Views and suggestions > What next? Any issues to take forward? How? Level of priority? Framework for Principles What are the objectives of financial consumer protection? What are the objectives of the G20 Principles? > Covering all areas of financial services > Consumer confidence in financial services, to promote growth & stability > Respond to: Increased transfer of risk to consumes; complexity of products; > Rapid changes & new (non-bank) providers & intermediaries > While financial access & literacy remain low > Voluntary principles, designed to complement sector-specific guidelines (IOSCO / BSBS / IAIS) > Principles may need to be adapted to national or sectoral circumstances Draft Principles – 1 1. Legal & Regulatory Framework > “integral part of the legal & regulatory framework” > “legal & judicial mechanisms to protect against financial fraud & abuses” > Appropriate regulation & supervision of service providers, agents & advisors > Consultation with industry, consumer bodies, professional bodies & research institutions 2. Role of oversight bodies > “Must be oversight bodies with explicit responsibility for financial consumer protection” > Independence, accountability, resources, powers … > Mechanism for effective cooperation between oversight bodies Draft Principles 3. Equitable & fair treatment for consumers > “Should be part of the corporate culture of financial service providers > “Similar protection for similar products & services > “Special attention to vulnerable groups 4. > > > > > Disclosure & transparency “Provide key information on benefits, terms, risks, costs “intermediary remuneration & conflicts “Standard pre-contractual disclosure promoted Health warnings (& information) on risky products Requirements on providers of advice Draft Principles 5. > > > > Financial Education & Awareness “Promote education & awareness Information on consumer rights easily accesible Recommend implementation of OECD Guidelines & Principles Special focus on vulnerable groups 6. Responsible business conduct of Financial Service Providers & their agents > “Providers accountable for action of their agents > Objective of engagement with consumers: “best interest of clients”; “assess capabilities & needs of clients”, before providing products or services > Staff properly trained > Avoid / disclose conflicts of interest > Remuneration structure encourage responsible business conduct Draft Principles 7. Protection of Consumer Rights > “Protect rights to deposits, savings & similar products > High degree of certainty; appropriate mechanisms 8. > > > Protection of consumer data & privacy “Through appropriate mechanisms Define purpose of collection; processing & disclosure Right of consumers to be informed (of data sharing), have access their data; data corrected or deleted Draft Principles 9. > > > > Complaints handling “Redress mechanisms … accessible, cheap, effective etc. Publish complaints statistics Providers & agents to provide first line of complaints & redress Independent process available of not resolved 10. Competition > “National & international competitive markets, for choice & price competition > Allow consumers to search & switch Draft Principles Principles 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Legal & regulatory framework Oversight bodies Equitable & fair treatment Disclosure & transparency Education & awareness Responsible Business Conduct Protection of consumer rights Protection of data & privacy Complaints handling Competition ???? Any of these inappropriate? Any important issues missing? Conflict with financial inclusion? Challenges in implementation? … what next? Related developments to consider FSB: “Consumer Finance Protection - consumer credit & mortgages - financial stability aspects - assessment of current practices • Implications? Issues:• • • Current consumer protection frameworks in credit & “consumer protection authorities” Engaging with consumer advocacy groups Competing objectives (prudential / protection); Independence & accountability Enforcement Complaints & dispute resolution • • • • Responsible mortgage lending practices = main issue Product regulation Unfair selling practices Disclosure & transparency • • • Concerns? • Suggestions? Any other issues in this respect? • ???? What • ???? • ???? • ???? To Do? Session III CEMC WG’s Governance > Election of CEMC WG chairperson > Announcement of new chairperson > Discussion and approval of CEMC WG seminal documents Governance ELECTED CHAIR > Bangko Sentral ng Philipinas ELECTED CO-CHAIR > Central Bank of Uganda SEMINAL DOCUMENTS > The CEMC WG members approve the charter and concept note Session IV CEMC WG’s sessions at the 2011 AFI GPF > Session on financial literacy > Session on transparency Thursday, 29 September, 17.00h – 18.30h Financial literacy and financial inclusion FACILITATOR > Ahmed Dermish, BFA PANELISTS > Bipin Nair, Reserve Bank of India > Giovanna Priale, SBS Peru > (TBC) SESSION OBJECTIVES > To increase understanding of the relationship between financial literacy and inclusion > To gain a better understanding of the role of policymakers/regulators > To identify cost-effective tools to increase the level of literacy > To provide input into the AFI CEMC WG’s work on this topic FORMAT > Advisory teams Friday, 30 September, 9.30h – 10.45h Improved transparency standards for financial inclusion MODERATOR > Shaun Mundy PANELISTS > Antoine Traore, BCEAO > Hastings Mzoma, Central Bank of Malawi > Belinda Caraan, Bangko Sentral ng Philipinas > Gaiv Tata, the World Bank > Katherine McKee, CGAP > Gabriel Davel, AFI Associate SESSION OBJECTIVES > To identify key issues in pricing and transparency > To discuss regulatory approaches and good practices re: transparency > To provide input into the AFI CEMC WG’s work on this topic FORMAT > Talk show Session V Agenda setting and operationalization > Presentation of proposed log-frame > Creation of subgroups Log-frame: template Intervention logic Impact/Goal Outcomes Outputs Activities What should it show: Change of state and improved situation Situational or behavior change or improvement that is necessary to reach the impact The tangible products, services, and results delivered which needs to be achieved to bring about the outcome Tasks that have to be undertaken to deliver the desired outputs It answers the question: What is our vision of the future? Where would we like to get to in the next 5 years? What are the main things that need to be delivered (in the next year) by the working group to achieve the vision? What needs to be done to deliver each of these outputs? Subgroups 5 subgroups Transparency and disclosure Sales and marketing practices Avenues for help and redress Financial education Harmonization of guidelines Guatemala Peru x BCEAO China Uganda Tanzania Palestine x Philippines Liberia x Russia Senegal Pakistan x RDC Mexico Malawi Angola Armenia x Thailand Paraguay Zambia x = focal point Session VI Sub-groups discussions > Discussion of expected outcomes and outputs > Discussion of work plan Session VII Next steps > Finalization of log-frame > Finalization of work plan > Agenda and logistic for the next meeting CEMC WG’s log-frame Goal Outcome Outputs Activities 4 priority areas Improved capacity of policymakers to design and implement effective policies to protect and empower consumers Guidelines on four priority areas for Consumer Empowerment and Market Conduct endorsed by AFI network members Relevant international frameworks (standards, principles, etc.) are better harmonized CEMC WG members recognized as leaders in consumer empowerment and market conduct Developed evidence based policymaker’s guidelines in four priority areas Produced report on country experiences Improved capacity of CEMCWG members to assess and analyze solutions and mechanisms for consumer protection and market conduct Identified and documented cost-effective tools that deliver information and enable redress for the poorest segment of the population Increased awareness among other policymakers and international stakeholders about CEMCWG lessons and solutions Develop and complete stocktaking survey Conduct Knowledge Exchange visits between CEMC WG members Undertake diagnostic study on selected CEMC WG members countries CEMCWG members present experiences and lessons learned in selected external forums Hold peer learning workshop on diagnostic tools and methodologies, and policy solutions, with strategic partners Peer reviews of draft policies and regulations Transparency and disclosure MARKET CONDUCT Sales and marketing practices Avenues for help and redress CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT Financial education Transparency and disclosures subgroup’s log-frame Outputs Developed evidence based policymaker’s guidelines in the area of transparency, with focus on cost-effective access to disclosed information (e.g. re: channels, standard contract for basic products, code of conducts, comparable information of basic products) Produced report on transparency based on the results of the stocktaking survey Identified and documented cost-effective tools that deliver information, also for the poorest segment of the population Activities Analyze transparency section of the stocktaking survey Identify common challenges and good practices Undertake diagnostic study on selected CEMC WG members countries Members Superintendencia de Guatemala Superintendencia de Peru (coordinator) BCEAO People’s Bank of China Central Bank of Uganda Sales and marketing practices subgroup’s log-frame Outputs Developed evidence based policymaker’s guidelines in the area of sales and marketing practices Produced report on sales and marketing practices based on the results of the stocktaking survey Identified and documented cost-effective tools that deliver information, protect, and empower consumers, also for the poorest segment of the population Activities Analyze sales and marketing practices section of the stocktaking survey Identify common challenges and good practices Undertake diagnostic study on selected CEMC WG members countries Members Central Bank of Tanzania Palestine Monetary Authority (coordinator) Bangko Sentral ng Philippinas Help and redress subgroup’s log-frame Outputs Developed evidence based policymaker’s guidelines on help and redress mechanisms Produced report on avenues for help and redress mechanisms based on the results of the stocktaking survey Identified and documented cost-effective tools that protect and empower consumers providing access to cost-effective help and redress mechanisms, also for the poorest segment of the population Activities Analyze relevant section of the stocktaking survey Identify common challenges and good practices Undertake diagnostic study on selected CEMC WG members countries Members Central Bank of Liberia (coordinator) Ministry of Economic Development of Russia Ministere de Finances du Senegal Financial education subgroup’s log-frame Outputs Developed evidence based policymaker’s guidelines on financial education, with focus on the development of national strategies Produced report on financial education based on the results of the stocktaking survey Identified and documented cost-effective tools that deliver financial education, also for the poorest segment of the population Activities Analyze relevant section of the stocktaking survey Identify common challenges and good practices Undertake diagnostic study on selected CEMC WG members countries Members State Bank of Pakistan (coordinator) Banque Centrale du Congo CNBV Mexico Reserve Bank of Malawi National Bank of Angola Harmonization of guidelines subgroup’s log-frame Identified and documented problems with concurrent internationally adopted frameworks (of standards, principles, and indicators) used to assess consumer empowerment policies and market conduct regulations in AFI member countries Activities Analyze relevant frameworks Identify common challenges due to the co-existence of concurrent frameworks Provide guidance to the other 4 CEMC WG sub-groups Members Central Bank of Armenia (coordinator) Central Bank of Thailand Banco Central do Paraguay Bank of Zambia Outputs