Infant Feeding: Human Milk and Formula Joan C Zerzan MS RD CD

advertisement

Infant Feeding: Human Milk and Formula

Joan C Zerzan MS RD CD

Infant Feeding: Historical Perspective

   Human Milk Human Milk Substitutes Science, Medicine and Industry

Feeding the Infant

 Considerations  Infant (needs, tolerance, acceptance, safety)    Family preferences Cost and availability Prevention, health, development, and programming

Feeding the Infant

 Choices:  Human Milk      Standard Infant Formula (Cow, Soy) Hypoallergenic (hydrolysates vs. amino acid based Other specialty formulas Preterm Post discharge formulas for preterm infants

Human Milk

 “No two hemispheres of any learned professor’s brain are equal to two healthy mammary glands in the production of a satisfactory food for infants” - Oliver Wendell Holmes

Human Milk

  Complements infant Immaturity Promotes maturation  Epithelial growth factors and hormones  Digestive enzymes - lipases and amylase

Characteristics and Advantages of Human Milk

      Low renal solute load Immunologic, growth and trophic factors  Decrease illness, infection, allergy Improved digestion and absorption Nutrient Composition: CHO, Protein, Fatty Acid, etc Cost Other

Human Milk

 Colostrum    Higher concentration of protein and antibodies Transitions around days 3-5 Mature by day 10

Human Milk

 Nutrient composition of human milk is remarkable for its variability, as the content of some of the nutrients change during lactation, throughout the day, or differ among women, while the content of some nutrients remain relatively constant throughout lactation.

Role of Human Milk Components in GI Development: Current Knowledge and Future Needs: Donovan J Pediatr 2006:149:S49-S61 “ existing clinical and epidemiological studies support a developmental advantage for breastfeeding. However, our understanding of the mechanisms by which HM components exert their actions within the human infant are limited by the large number of bioactive compounds in milk and the complexity of the potential interactions among the components and with the developing intestine”

Human Milk Compartments

  

Aqueous Phase

Ca, Mg, Ph, Na, Cl, CO2, casein proteins, whey proteins (lactoalbumin, lactoferrin, IgA, lysozyme, albumin) Lactose, amino acids, water soluble vitamins Colloidal Dispersion

Caseins, Ca, Ph Fat emulsion

Fat (phospholipid, TG, cholesterol) protein as fat globule membrane, enzymes, trace minerals, fat soluble vitamins, macrophages, neutrophils, lymphocytes

Preterm vs. Mature Human Milk

     

Increased nitrogen Increased fats (LCFA, MCFA, SCFA) Increased Na/Cl Increased Fe (?) Increased Mg No differences in energy, linolenic acid, potassium, Ca, Ph, Cu, Zn, Vits B1-12, fat soluble vitamins

How is milk made?

Milk Synthesis

 Mammary gland contains stem cells and highly differentiated secretory alveolar cells at the terminal ducts. Stimulated by insulin and HGH synergized by prolactin, these cells are active in milk synthesis and secretion

Milk synthesis and secretion

    Exocytosis ( protein, lactose, Ca/Ph, citrate) Fat synthesis ( SCFA TG synthesized in cytoplasm and smooth endoplasmic reticulum + precursors imported from maternal circulation): alveolar cells synthesize Secretion of ions and water Immunoglobins transferred from extracellular spaces

Paracellular Pathway (5

th

process)

 The paracellular spaces between alveolar cells normally prevent transfer secondary to tight junctions. If these spaces become “leaky” plasma constituents may pass directly into the milk.

Milk Synthesis and secretion

 Under neuroendocrine control that varies with timing and stage of lactation   Prolactin Lactogens      Estrogen Thyroxine Growth hormone ACTH other  Stimulus: infant suckling

Milk synthesis

 Protein: vast majority of proteins present in human milk are specific to mammary secretions and not identified in any quantity elsewhere in nature:   Immunoglobins transferred from plasma in early stages of lactation De novo protein synthesis by mammary gland

Diet, milk production, and milk composition   There is a great variation in milk composition during a feed, from feed to feed, and even between breasts.

The impact of dietary variation and milk composition is unclear. Overall milk composition remains relatively unaffected by diet variations although there are reports to the contrary:  DHA and ARA supplementation, vegan diet, drugs and environmental contaminants,…..

Breast milk composition and Diet

    DHA levels of breast milk vary with diet. Increased amounts of DHA have been found in the breast milk of mothers consuming fish or fish oil, and with supplementation.

Water soluble vitamins may vary with diet. Diets inadequate in B12 or thiamin have been associated with case reports of deficiency in infants. High intakes of Vitamin C, however, does not appear to change the content of breast milk.

Supplementation of fat soluble vitamins do not appear to alter the content of breast milk Iron supplementation does not appear to alter the iron content of breast milk

Science and Lactation: Frank Hytten  “ In general, it is probable that the breast has a high priority for nutrients and that moderate maternal under nutrition will have little effect on milk production. But severe malnutrition, which rarely exists without associated ill-health and other adverse circumstances, may reduce milk yield”

Influence of diet on milk composition

    Protein-energy malnutrition impacts milk volume. Composition remains relatively unaffected Water soluble vitamins move readily from serum to milk thus dietary fluctuations are more apparent  B12 vegan, case report of beriberi…..

Fat soluble vitamin content not improved with supplementation Fatty acid composition (DHA and ARA) altered by maternal diet and supplementation

Distribution of Kcals: Breast milk

% Protein 6 % Fat % Carbohydrate 52 42

Protein:

Predominant protein of human milk is whey. Casein/whey ratio is between 40:60 and 30:70  Casein: proteins of the curd (low solubility at pH 4.6)  Whey: soluble proteins (remain soluble at pH 4.6) Lactalbumin Lactoferrin Secretory IgA Lactoglobulin

Carbohydrate

  Predominant carbohydrate of breast milk is lactose (7.3 g/dl) Oligosaccharides (1.2 g/dl)  Prebiotics: indigestible CHO that enhance the growth of “favorable” bacteria and contribute to the unique GI bacterial characteristics of BF infant (bifidobacteria)

Fat

   2.5- 4.5% Fat (provides approx 50% of calories) Contained in membrane enclosed milk fat globules  Core: TG (98-99%of total milk fat)  Membrane: phospholipids, cholesterol, protein DHA/ARA: wide variations

DHA/ARA concentration variation in human milk

  DHA: 0.1-1.4% ARA: 0.31- 0.71%  DHA lowest in populations with high meat intake and highest in populations with high fish intake

Breast milk and establishment of core microbiome

  Definition: Full collection of microbes that naturally exist within the body.

Alterations or disruptions in core microbiome associated with chronic illness: Crohns disease, increased susceptibility to infection, allergy, NEC, etc

Microbiome

 Beneficial effect for the host:      Nutrient metabolism Tissue development Resistance to colonization with pathogens Maintenance of intestinal homeostasis Immunological activation and protection of GI integrity

Human milk and microbiome

   Core microbiome established soon after birth Core microbiome of breastfeeding infant similar to core microbiome of lactating mother Components of breast milk supporting establishment of microbiome  Prebiotics

AAP Policy Statement: Breastfeeding and the use of human milk: Pediatrics 115 #2 2005    Human milk is species specific and uniquely superior for infant feeding Exclusive breastfeeding is the reference or normative model against which all alternative methods must be measured in regards to growth, development and health Research provides strong evidence that human milk feeding decreases the incidence and/or severity of a number of infectious diseases (meningitis, Otitis media, UTIs, Respiratory tract infections, NEC, diarrhea)

AAP Policy Statement: Breastfeeding and the use of human milk:

  Some studies suggest decreased incidence of SIDS, diabetes (type 1 and 2), leukemia, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, and allergy (asthma and atopy) Breastfeeding has been associated with slightly enhanced performance on tests of cognitive development.

AAP Policy Statement: Breastfeeding and the use of human milk

 AAP statement includes 15 recommendations on Breastfeeding healthy term infants including:   Establish peripartum policies and practices supporting breastfeeding Place infant skin to skin after delivery until first feeding is accomplished

AAP Policy Statement:Recommendations continued      Supplements (water, glucose water, formula) should not be given unless medically indicated Avoid pacifier during initiation 8-12 feedings at the breast every 24 hours during early weeks All newborn breastfeeding infants should be seen by HCP at 3-5 days and again at 2-3 weeks of age All breast feeding infants should receive 200 (changed to 400) IU Vitamin D

AAP: Breast milk and allergy

 1.Breast milk is an optimal source of nutrition for infants through the first year of life or longer. Those breastfeeding infants who develop symptoms of food allergy may benefit from:  a.maternal restriction of cow's milk, egg, fish, peanuts and tree nuts and if this is unsuccessful,  b.use of a hypoallergenic (extensively hydrolyzed or if allergic symptoms persist, a free amino acid based formula) as an alternative to breastfeeding .

AAP Policy Statement: Breastfeeding and the use of human milk:

 Contraindications to breastfeeding      Galactosemia Maternal use/exposure to certain radioactive or chemotherapeutic agents Maternal abuse of “street drugs” Active HSV lesions of breast Maternal HIV (in USA)

Bright Futures

   AAP/HRSA/MCHB http://www.brightfutures.org

“Bright Futures is a practical development approach to providing health supervision for children of all ages from birth through adolescence.”

Newborn Visit: Breastfeeding

  Maternal care      rest fluids relieving breast engorgement caring for nipples eating properly Follow-up support from the health professional by telephone, home visit, nurse visit, or early office visit.

Newborn Visit: Breastfeeding

 Infant Guidance  how to hold the baby and get him to latch on properly;     feeding on cue 8-12 times a day for the first four to six weeks; feeding until the infant seems content.

Newborn breastfed babies should have six to eight wet diapers per day, as well as several "mustardy" stools per day. Give the breastfeeding infant 400 I.U.'s of vitamin D daily if he is deeply pigmented or does not receive enough sunlight.

Cautionary Tales

   Cooper et al. Pediatrics 1995. Increased incidence of severe breastfeeding malnutrition and hypernatremia in a metropolitan area.

Rolf et al. ACTA Paediatrica 2009. A nationwide study on hospital admissions due to dehydration in exclusively breastfed infants in the Netherlands:its incidence, clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome Lozoff et al. J Pediatrics 2009 Higher Infant Blood Levels with Longer Duration of Breastfeeding

Cooper.

 5 breastfed infants admitted to Children’s hospital in Cincinnati over 5 months period for breastfeeding malnutrition and dehydration       Age of admission: 5-14 days Weight loss at admission 23%, range 14-32% Serum Na: 186 mmol/L, range 161-214 (136-143 wnl) mothers were between the ages of 28 and 38, had prepared for breastfeeding 3 had inverted nipples and reported latch-on problems before discharge 3 families had contact with health care providers before readmission including calls to PCP and home visit by PHN

Rolf

    Survey to determine incidence and characteristics of hospital admission due to dehydration Dutch Paediatric Surveillance Unit 2003-2005 of all hospital admissions during 1 st 3 months in fully breast fed infants 250 reported cases. N= 158 (excluded cases with incomplete information or co-existing medical conditions accounting for hospitalization

Rolf

  Incidence    40/y/10,000 < 11 days of age Overall incidence 48/y/10,000 < 3 months Severe dehydration 20/y/100,000 Characteristics in infants < 11 days  Age at admission (mean/median) 3/5    Median weight loss: 9.3% Na range: 142-167 Other characteristics: lethargy, jaundice, shock/seizures, evidence of inadequate intake via pre/post weights (67%)

Lozoff

 Our findings support the conclusions… “that this phenomenon constitutes a potential public health problem in areas where environmental lead exposure is continuing as well as where environmental lead exposure has recently declined”… Our findings do not detract from the many known benefits of breastfeeding. Rather, they suggest that monitoring lead concentrations in breastfed infants should be considered….

Infant Feeding: Historical Perspective

   Human Milk Human Milk Substitutes Science, Medicine and Industry

Human Milk Substitutes

  Early evidence of artificial feeding Majority of infants received breast milk  Maternal BF  Wet nurses  Wealthy women   Orphans, abandoned, “illegitimate” Prematurity or congenital deformities

Wet Nurses

    Work demands, societal needs, vanity, health requirements, social diversion Proper selection: Questionable character-- Infant would suck in her vices Wet Nurse Industry: emerging infant mortality/abuse Impact of industrial revolution: Wet nurses made better money in factories

Human Milk Substitutes

    Milk from other mammals (cow, goat, donkey, camel) Pablum: (bread and water)  “bread, water, flour, sugar and castille soap to aid digestion” Beer Archeological findings, cows horn, glass bottle shaped like horn, pap boat or pap spoon

Human Milk Substitutes: Infant Mortality

    Artificial feeding in first weeks of life associated with 100% mortality 19 th century infant mortality with “hand feeding” was 88% Foundlings: 80% In Dublin Foundling hospital 1775-96: 99.6%

Science, Medicine, and Industry

Growth of child Health and welfare in early 20 th century

Science, Medicine, and Industry

   Infant Morbidity and Mortality Recognition of association with human milk substitutes, and infection Industrial development  Storage   Safety Food industry

Historical timeline

  1900  Pasteurization of milk in US  Association between bacteria and diarrhea 1912  U.S Children’s Bureau  Public Health and Pediatricians efforts to improve infant/child health and decrease mortality  1920   Intro evaporated milk Cod liver oil prevents rickets      Curd tension of milk altered Increased availability of refrigeration Vitamin C isolated Vitamin D prepared in pure form Improved sanitation

Infant Formulas - History

  Cow’s milk is high in protein, low in CHO, results in large initial curd formation in gut if not heated before feeding Early Formulas   from 1920-1950 majority of non-breastfed infants received evaporated milk formulas boiled or evaporated milk solved curd formation problems CHO provided by corn syrup or other cho to decrease relative protein kcals

Human Milk Substitutes

  1920-1950’s: evaporated or fresh cow’s milk, water and added CHO (prepared at home) 1950’s to present commercially prepared infant formulas have replaced home recipes

Historical timeline

 1940  Homogenized milk widely marketed  1960   Further advances in technology and packaging Commercially prepared infant formula becoming increasingly popular

Infant Formula - History, cont.

   50s and 60s commercial formulas replaced home preparation 1959: iron fortification introduced, but in 1971 only 25% of infants were fed Fe fortified formula Cow’s milk feedings started in middle of first year between 1950-1970s. In 1970 almost 70% of infants were receiving cow’s milk.

Interesting Milestones in Infant Nutrition

   1784: Underwood recommends cows milk as alternative to breast feeding 1800: glass feeding bottles 1838: Simon determines protein CM>BM     1845: Pratt patents rubber nipple 1856: Borden patents condensed milk 1883: Meyenberg patents evaporated goats milk 1885: Meigs analyses human milk

Interesting Milestones in Infant Nutrition

      1911: MJ introduces Dextri-maltose 1915: SMA 1920: Franklyn (Similac) 1929: MJ markets Sobee, hypoallergenic 1930-60: Concentrated liquid, hydrolysed, elemental, and ready to feed formulas introduced What now?

Formula

Formula Composition

Breast Milk as “gold standard”

Attempt to duplicate composition of breastmilk

 

? Bioactivity, relationship, function of all factors present in breast milk ? Measure outcome: growth, composition, functional indices

    

Formula Brands Ross

 Similac/Isomil/Alimentum

Mead Johnson

 Enfamil/Prosobee/Enfacare

Nestle

 Good Start

Wyeth

 Generic in USA; Gold Brands; SMA

SHS

 NeoCate, DuoCal

Distribution of Kcals

Formula % Protein % Fat % Carbohydrate 9 48 42

Vitamin and Mineral content

  NAS/FDA Meet levels at typical volumes ingested by infants (@ 24-32 ounces)  i.e. RDA/DRI

Standard Infant Formulas, Milk or Soy Based………..

Cow’s Milk Based Formula

  Commercial formula designed to approximate nutrients provided in human milk Some nutrients added at higher levels due to less complete digestion and absorption

Milk Based Formulas

 Standard 0-12 months   Similac with iron Enfamil with iron   Good Start Essentials/Good Start Supreme Wyeth Generic  Standard 0-12 mos with DHA/ARA  Similac Advance with iron    Enfamil Lipil with iron Good Start Supreme DHA/ARA Wyeth formulas

Protein

  Blend of whey and casein proteins 8.2-9.6% total calories  whey proteins of human and cow’s milk are different and have different amino acid profiles.

 Major whey proteins of human milk are lactalbumin (high levels of essential aa) , immunoglobulins, and lactoferrin( enhances iron transportation)  Cow’s milk has low levels of these proteins and high levels of b lactoglobulin

Cow’s Milk Based Formula: Fat & CHO    Fat: butterfat of cow’s milk is replaced with vegetable fat sources to make the fatty acid profile of cow’s milk formulas more like those of human milk and to increase the proportion of essential fatty acids CHO: Lactose is the major carbohydrate in most cows’ milk based formulas.

Meets needs of healthy infants

Milk Based Pre and Probiotic Supplemented

   Marketed to promote digestive health and support healthy immune fx Probiotic   Bifidus BL  Gerber Good start Protect Plus Lactobacillus rhamosus  Nutramigen Lipil with Enflora Prebiotic   Galactooligosaccarides (GOS) Similac Advance Early Shield (Triple Shield), Enfamil Premium, Generic Brands

Infant Formulas: AAP

 Cow’s milk based formula is recommended for the first 12 months if breast milk is not available

Soy Formulas

   First developed in 1930s with soy flour Early formulas produced diarrhea and excessive gas Now use soy protein isolate with added methionine

Soy Formulas

Isomil/Isomil DF /Isomil Advance/Isomil Advance 2

Prosobee/Prosobee Lipil/Next Step Prosobee

Good Start Essentials Soy/Good Start 2 Essentials Soy

Wyeth All iron fortified

Soy Formulas

   Protein: soy protein isolate with added methionine Fat: vegetables oils CHO: usually corn based products

Soy Formulas

Characteristics compared to Milk Based     

Higher protein

(lower quality)

Higher sodium, calcium, and phosphorus Carbohydrate:

free Corn syrup solids, sucrose, and/or maltodextrin; lactose

Fats

: Long chain

Meet needs of healthy infants

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. Soy Protein-based Formulas: Recommendations for Use in Infant Feeding. Pediatrics 1998;101:148-153.

    Soy formulas given to 25% of infants but needed by very few Offers no advantage over cow milk protein based formula as a supplement for breastfed infants Provides appropriate nutrition for normal growth and development Indicated primarily in the case of vegetarian families and for the very small number of infants with galactosemia and hereditary lactase deficiency

Possible Concerns about Soy Formulas: AAP

     60% of infants with cowmilk protein induced enterocolitis will also be sensitive to soy protein damaged mucosa allows increased uptake of antigen.

Contains phytates and fiber oligosacharides so will inhibit absorption of minerals (additional Ca is added) Higher levels of osteopenia in preterm infants given soy formulas Phytoestrogens at levels that demonstrate physiologic activity in rodent models Higher aluminum levels

Health Consequences of Early Soy Consumption. Badger et al. J Nutr. 2002     US soy formulas made with soy protein isolate (SPI+) SPI+ has several phytochemicals, including isoflavones Isoflavones are referred to as phytoestrogens Phytoestrogens bind to estrogen receptors & act as estrogen agonists, antagonists, or selective estrogen receptor modulators depending on tissue, cell type, hormonal status, age, etc.

Figure 1. Hypothetical serum concentrations profile of isoflavones from conception through weaning in typical Asians and Americans. The values represent the range of isoflavonoids reported by Adlercreutz et al. (6 ) for Japanese (dotted lines) or reported by Setchell et al. (3 ) for Americans fed soy infant formula (dashed line).

Should we be Concerned? Badger et al.

    No human data support toxicity of soyfoods Soyfoods have a long history in Asia Millions of American infants have been fed soy formula over the past 3 decades Rat studies indicate a potential protective effect of soy in infancy for cancer

Contraindications to Soy Formula: AAP

    preterm infants due to increased risk of inadequate bone mineralization infants with cow milk protein-induced enteropathy or enterocolitis most previously well infants with acute gastroenteritis prevention of colic or allergy.

Soy formula for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants (Cochrane, 2006)  “Feeding with a soy formula cannot be recommended for prevention of allergy or food intolerance in infants at high risk of allergy or food intolerance. Further research may be warranted to determine the role of soy formulas for prevention of allergy or food intolerance in infants unable to be breast fed with a strong family history of allergy or cow's milk protein intolerance.”

Predigested protein based infant formulas

Protein Hydrolysate Formulas

  

Alimentum Advance Pregestimil/Pregestimil Lipil Nutramigen Lipil

 Protein Casein hyrolysate + free AA’s  Fat (Alimentum and Pregestimil) Medium chain + Long chain triglycerides; chain triglycerides (Nutramigen) Long Carbohydrate: Lactose free

Hydrolysate Formulas

  Whey Hydrolysate Formula: Cow’s milk based formula in which the protein is provided as whey proteins that have been hydrolyzed to smaller protein fractions, primarily peptides. This formula may provoke an allergic response in infants with cow’s milk protein allergy. Casein Hydrolysate Formula: Infant formula based on hydrolyzed casein protein, produced by partially breaking down the casein into smaller peptide fragments and amino acids. `

Cow’s milk protein avoidance and development of childhood wheeze in children with a family history of atopy (Cochrane, 2003)    Breast-milk should remain the feed of choice for all babies.

In infants with at least one first degree relative with atopy, hydrolysed formula for a minimum of four months combined with dietary restrictions and environment measures may reduce the risk of developing asthma or wheeze in the first year of life. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that soya-based milk formula has any benefit.

Formulas containing hydrolysed protein for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants (2006)  There is no evidence to support feeding with a hydrolysed formula for the prevention of allergy compared to exclusive breast feeding. In high risk infants who are unable to be completely breast fed, there is limited evidence that prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed formula compared to a cow's milk formula reduces infant and childhood allergy and infant cow’s milk allergy. In view of methodological concerns and inconsistency of findings, further large, well designed trials comparing formulas containing partially hydrolysed whey, or extensively hydrolysed casein to cow's milk formulas are needed.

AAP Policy Statement Re: Hypoallergenic Infant Formulas (August, 2000) Recommendations

AAP Policy Statement Re: Hypoallergenic Infant Formulas (August, 2000)  Currently available, partially hydrolyzed formulas are not hypoallergenic.

2.Formula-fed infants with confirmed cow's milk allergy may benefit from the use of a hypoallergenic or soy formula as described for the breastfed infant.

3.Infants at high risk for developing allergy, identified by a strong (biparental; parent, and sibling) family history of allergy may benefit from exclusive breastfeeding or a hypoallergenic formula or possibly a partial hydrolysate formula. Conclusive studies are not yet available to permit definitive recommendations. However, the following recommendations seem reasonable at this time:

AAP Policy Statement Re: Hypoallergenic Infant Formulas (August, 2000)  Carefully conducted randomized controlled studies in infants from families with a history of allergy must be performed to support a formula claim for allergy prevention. Allergic responses must be established prospectively, evaluated with validated scoring systems, and confirmed by double-blind,placebo-controlled challenge. These studies should continue for at least 18 months and preferably for 60 to 72 months or longer where possible

Elemental formula for infants

Amino Acid Based Formulas

 Elecare, Neocate, Nutramigen AA  Protein: Free Amino Acids    Fat: Long chain and medium chain  Elecare (33% MCT), Neocate (5% MCT) Carbohydrate: corn syrup solids, Lactose and sucrose free Indications for use: Food Allergy or intolerance to peptides or whole protein

Elemental Infant Formula

NeoCate (SHS)

 Protein: Free Amino Acids    Fat: Long chain Carbohydrate: Lactose Free Indications for use: Food Allergy or intolerance to peptides or whole protein

Other Specialty Formulas

  

Portagen

 (Mead Johnson) 85% fat MCT, 15% fat Corn oil  Used for infants with chylothorax

Similac PM 60/40

 (Ross) Low in Ca, P, K+ and NA; 2:1 Ca:P ratio  Used for infants with Renal Failure

Formulas for Metabolic Disorders

 Several condition specific products by Ross and Mead Johnson

Premature Formulas

General Characteristics compared to Standard 

Increased Protein,Vitamins & Minerals

For infants born at <1.5kg

 up to 2000-2500gm  Feeding of infants > 2500 gm  risk of vitamin toxicities  Premature formulas vary in nutrient content

Premature Formula Protein: Whey Predominant CHO: Lactose and Glucose Polymers Fat: Medium and Long chain TG Higher concentration of vitamins and minerals Iso-osmolar Standard Infant Formula Protein: Whey or Casein predominant CHO: Lactose Fat: Long chain TG Meets term vitamin and mineral guidelines at 24-32 oz Iso-osmolar

Premature Infant Breast Milk Additives and Formulas

Enfamil Human Milk Fortifier

Similac Human Milk Fortifier

 Powdered breast milk additives 

Similac Natural Care Advance

 Liquid breast milk additive 

Similac Special Care Advance

Enfamil Premature +/- Lipil

Post Premature Infant formula

“Post” Premature Formulas

 

NeoSure Advance EnfaCare Lipil

 Standard Dilution: 22 kcal/oz    Protein: between standard and Premature Vitamins: Higher than standard,significantly lower than Premature Calcium and Phosphorus: between standard and Premature

Formulas with DHA & ARA

Ross Mead Johnson Full term Preterm Similac Advance Enfamil Lipil Similac Special Care, Similac Natural Care, NeoSure Advance Enfamil Premature Lipil, Enfacare Lipil

Indications

      Cow’s milk based  Health term infant Soy   Vegetarian Galactosemia Protein Hydrolysates   Protein intolerance/allergy other Preterm Formulas Post-discharge Preterm formulas Other Specialty Formulas  Specific medical, metabolic indications

Know What You Are Feeding

n n Caloric density, protein, fat and carbohydrate vitamin and mineral content.

Osmolality: n Renal Solute Load: Evaluate RSL in context of solute intake, fluid intake and output.

n n Evidence Based Rationale n Cost and availability

Finding Up to Date Information  www.ross.com

Similac products  www.meadjohnson.com

Enfamil products  www.verybestbaby.com

Nestle products  www.wyethnutritionals.com

generic products   www.brightbeginnings.com

lower cost formulas made by Wyeth www.shsna.com/html/Hypoallergenic.htm

Neocate formulas

Regulation of Infant Formula

   FDA  Infant Formula Act Manufacturers  Voluntary monitoring AAP, National Academy of Sciences, other professional organizations  Guidelines for composition and intake: (e.g. DRI’s)  Guidelines for preparation and handling of formula/human milk in health care facilities

Regulation of Infant Formulas

 Infant Formula Act:   Manufacturing regulations Quality control  Non specific testing requirements, case by case basis, growth outcomes    Recall Proceedures Nutrient content and labeling Panel convened 1998 and 2002 (recommended revisions including exemptions)

Regulation of Infant Formulas

 Infant Formula Act: The purpose of the infant formula act (1980) is to ensure the safety and nutrition of infant formulas – including minimum and in some cases maximum levels of specified nutrients. The act authorizes the FDA to establish appropriate regulations for 1) new formulas, 2) formulas entering the U.S. market, 3) major changes, revisions, or substitutions of macronutrients 4) formulas manufactured in new plants or processing lines, 5) addition of new constituents 6) use of new equipment or technology 7) packaging changes

Formula Regulation

   Regulation is by the Infant Formula Act of 1980, under FDA authority Nutrient composition guidelines for 29 nutrients established by AAP Committee on Nutrition and adopted as regs by FDA Nutrient Requirements for Infant Formulas. Federal Register 36, 23553-23556. 1985. 21 CFR Part 107.

Infant Formula Act

  Institute of Medicine Food and Nutrition Board 3/2004 “Although the federal regulatory processes for evaluating the safety of food ingredients have worked well for conventional substances, they were not designed to ensure the needs and vulnerabilities of infants and are insufficient to ensure the safety of new types of ingredients proposed for infant formulas

Infant Formula Act

 “ The current regulatory processed do not fully address the unique role of formula as a food source. Formula is the only infants’ food if they are not being breastfed. The processes used to regulate the safety of any new additions of formula should be tailored to these products distict role and the special needs and susceptibilities of infants ”

Infant Formula Act

  Key limitation: lack of explicit guideleines for determining when and what safety data is needed…..(GRAS) Clarification is crucial given the increasing number of bioactive peptides and enzymens generated from unconventional sources or new technologies

Infant Formula Act: Points for discussion

  Addition of DHA and ARA to formulas Addition of prebiotics to formula  Present in BM    GRAS Vitamin/mineral content conforms to regulation ? testing

Formula Safety Issues - 2002

    Enterobacter Sakazakii in Intensive care units Powered formula is not sterile so should not be used with high risk infants FDA recommends mixing with boiling water but this may affect availability of vitamins & proteins and also cause clumping Irradiation proposed

Formula safety

 FDA recall list 2005-2006

Formula Safety

 Infant Feedings: Guidelines for Preparation of Formula and Breastmilk in Health Care Facilities: Pediatric Nutrition Practice Group of ADA 2003       AAP AHA ANA FDA CDC others

Milk Feedings Cautionary Tales

  Keating et al. AJDC 1991. Oral water intoxication in infants.

Lucas et al. Arch Dis Child. 1992. Randomized trial of ready to fed compared with powdered formula.

Keating

   24 cases of oral water intoxication in 3 years at Children’s Hospital and St. Louis Most were from very low income families and were offered water at home when formula ran out Authors suggest: provision of adequate formula and anticipatory guidance

Lucas

    43 infants randomized to RTF or powdered formula Infants given powdered formula had increased body wt. And skinfold thickness at 3 and 6 mos.. Compared to RTF and breastfed Powdered formula - 6 of 19 were above the 90th percentile wt/ht, but only 1 of 19 RTF infants Authors suggest errors in reconstitution of formula

Formula Safety

  Iron and Breastmilk Powdered products in at-risk populations   Non sterile Recommend against use unless no other alternative

Bright Futures

   AAP/HRSA/MCHB http://www.brightfutures.org

“Bright Futures is a practical development approach to providing health supervision for children of all ages from birth through adolescence.”

Additional concerns/issues

    Appropriate infant feeding  Cows milk, goats milk, homemade formulas safety Preparation: mixing, storing, warming (microwave) miscellaneous

Formula Safety

     Separate room for mixing Aseptic conditions Gram scale, appropriately calibrated measuring tools Standardized recipes Temperature, hang time etc

Cows milk and goats milk

    Protein RSL Folic acid, iron, vitamin D pasteurization

AAP: Cow’s Milk in Infancy

 Objections include:       Cow’s milk poor source of iron GI blood loss may continue past 6 months Bovine milk protein and Ca inhibit Fe absorption Increased risk of hypernatremic dehydration with illness Limited essential fatty acids, vitamin C, zinc Excessive protein intake with low fat milks

Newborn Visit: Bottle-feeding

    type of formula, preparation feeding techniques, and equipment. Hold baby in semi-sitting position to feed. Do not use a microwave oven to heat formula. To avoid developing a habit that will harm your infant's teeth, do not put him to bed with a bottle or prop it in his mouth.

Download
Study collections