Segment 2 - Winona State University

advertisement

Biology & Ecology of SE

MN Karst Region Streams

Macroinvertebrate

Ecology & Bioassessments

Natural History of Stream Invertebrates:

Making Sense of Biotic Indices

Segment 2 Outline

Roles and types of aquatic macroinvertebrates

Habitats, feeding, life histories, and tolerance

Biological integrity and its application in southern MN

photosynthesis

Freshwater Ecology

substrate temperature light

Physical current pH macrophytes

Biological Chemical

DO

[nutrients] macroinvertebrates fish alkalinity

The Importance of Macroinvertebrates

Macroinvertebrates are an essential component of freshwater ecosystems

• They serve as food for other organisms (fish, amphibians and waterfowl)

• Are essential to the breakdown and cycling of organic matter and nutrients

• Macroinvertebrate diversity is vital to a properly functioning ecosystem

Why Study Macroinvertebrates?

• Macroinvertebrates are used to assess the health of freshwater environments

• Some macroinvertebrates are sensitive to stress produced by pollution, habitat modification, or severe natural events

• Sampling and identifying macroinvertebrates can reveal whether a body of water is healthy or unhealthy and may reveal the cause of the problem

Why are macroinvertebrates biological indicators of stream health?

Spend up to one year (or more) in the stream

Have little mobility

Generally abundant

Primary food source for many fish

Good indicators of local conditions

Diversity = healthy stream

Easy to sample

Adult Caddisfly

Stream Benthic Macroinvertebrates:

Standard Habitat Samples from Iowa Streams

Common Macroinvertebrates

Mayflies (Ephemeroptera)

Ephemerellidae Heptageniidae Isonychiidae

Baetidae (Adult)

Common Macroinvertebrates

Stoneflies (Plecoptera)

Pteronarcydiae

Perlidae

Perlodidae

(Adult)

Common Macroinvertebrates

Caddisflies

(Trichoptera)

Brachycentridae Phryganeidae Hydropsychidae

Philopotamidae Case (Adult)

Common Macroinvertebrates

Damselflies and

Dragonflies (Odonata)

True Bugs (Hemiptera)

Dobsonflies, Alderflies and

Fishflies (Megaloptera)

Beetles (Coleoptera)

Common Macroinvertebrates

True Flies (Diptera)

Midge (Chironomidae)

Blackfly (Simuliidae)

Midge adult Cranefly (Tipulidae)

Common Macroinvertebrates

Crayfish and

Amphipods(Crustacea)

Snails/Mussels (Mollusca)

Worms and

Leeches(Oligochaeta)

Planarians (Platyhelminthes)

Habitat

Macroinvertebrate Biology

Movement

Feeding

Life History

Stress Tolerance

Use in Biomonitoring

Habitat

The place where an organism lives

Running waters – lotic – seeps, springs, brooks, branches, creeks, streams, rivers

Standing waters – lentic – bogs, marshes, swamps, ponds, lakes erosional (riffles, wave action) or depositional areas (point bars, pools)

Mineral bedrock, boulders, cobbles, pebble, gravel, sand, silt, clay

Organic live plants, detritus

Movement

Locomotion, habits, or mode of existence

Clingers – maintain a relatively fixed position on firm substrates in current

Climbers – dwell on live aquatic plants or plant debris

Crawlers – have elongate bodies with thin legs, slowly move using legs

Sprawlers – live on the bottom consisting of fine sediments

Burrowers – dig down and reside in the soft, fine sediment

Swimmers – adapted for moving through water

Skaters – adapted to remain on the surface of water

Feeding

Macroinvertebrates are described by how they eat, rather than what they eat

Functional Feeding Groups – categories of macroinvertebrates based on body structures and behavioral mechanisms that they use to acquire their food

Shredders

Chew on intact or large pieces of plant material

•Material is usually >1 mm, referred to as Coarse Particulate Organic

Matter (CPOM)

Shredder-herbivores feed on living aquatic plants that grow submerged in the water (northern casemaker caddisflies)

Shredder-detritivores feed on detritus, or dead plant material in a state of decay (giant stoneflies)

Collectors

Acquire and ingest very small particles (<1 mm) of detritus, often referred to as fine particulate organic matter (FPOM)

Collector-gatherers

– eat fine detritus that has fallen out of suspension that is lying on the bottom or mixed with bottom sediments

Collector-filterers

use special straining mechanisms to feed on fine detritus that is suspended in the water

Piercers

mouthparts, or sometimes their entire head, protrude as modifications to puncture food and bring out the fluids contained inside

Piercer-herbivores – penetrate the tissues of vascular or aquatic plants or individual cells of filamentous algae and suck the liquid contents (crawling water beetles, microcaddisflies)

Piercer-predators – subdue and kill other animals by removing their body fluids

Scrapers/Grazers

Adapted to remove and consume the thin layer of algae and bacteria that grows tightly attached to solid substrates in shallow waters

• Jaws of scrapers have sharp, angular edges

(function like using a putty knife or paint scraper)

(flathead mayflies, water pennies, snails)

Engulfer-Predators

Feed upon living animals, either by swallowing the entire body of small prey orby tearing large prey into pieces that are small enough to consume

(common stoneflies and hellgrammites)

FFG Examples Diet

Predators Dragonflies, damselflies, stoneflies

Shredders Stoneflies, beetles, caddisflies

Grazers /

Scrapers

Other insects

CPOM, leaves, woody debris

Mayflies, caddisflies, true flies, beetles

Periphyton, diatoms

Characteristics

Toothy jaws, larger in size

Streamlined, flat

Scraping mandibles

Gathering

Collectors

Filtering

Collectors

Mayflies, worms, midges, crayfish

FPOM, settled particles, bacteria

Black flies, netspinning caddisflies, mayflies

FPOM, phytoplankton, floating particles

Filtering hairs, hemoglobin

Some build cases

(caddisflies)

Autochthonous vs. Allochthonous Inputs

Autochthonous – biomass produced within the system (in stream)

- algae, periphyton, macrophytes

Allochthonous – biomass produced outside the system (riparian and upland)

- tree and shrub leaves and needles

Light is a primary determinant of whether the food base for a given community is live green plants growing within the aquatic environment or decaying plant material that originated in the terrestrial environment

Functional Feeding

Groups: The River

Continuum

(Vannote et al., 1980)

HEADWATERS:

Shredders abundant

• Coarse POM

MID-REACHES:

Grazers abundant

• Higher 1 ° production

A

M

O

R

D

S

T

R

E

E

R

LARGE RIVERS:

Collectors abundant

• Fine-Ultra fine POM

FPOM

CPOM

FPOM

Relative Channel Width

Life History

Reproduction, growth, and development of an organism

Hermaphroditic organisms – contain both male and female reproductive organs (flatworms, aquatic earthworms, leeches, snails)

Oviparous – females lay their eggs outside of their body

Ovoviviparous – females retain their eggs and allow them to hatch within their body and release free-living offspring

Growth is relatively simple in flatworms, aquatic earthworms and leeches because they are not restricted by any type of external protective structures

Exoskeleton of arthropods does not grow once it has been produced, so growth of the organism is restricted. As a result, arthropods must shed their skin (molt) in order to increase in size (3-45 times).

Mollusks are enclosed in non-living protective shells produced by the organism; shells are made of protein and calcium carbonate; made larger by adding material, like a tree growth ring

Insect Life Cycles

Metamorphosis -

 biological process involving a conspicuous and relatively abrupt change in the insect's body structure through cell growth and differentiation.

Complete metamorphosis is egg > larva (nymph) > pupa > adult

Incomplete metamorphosis

Insect Life Cycles

Many (but not all) of the aquatic macroinvertebrates are in the larval or nymphal stage while in a stream, and will eventually leave the water when they are adults that can fly.

Adult insects often have very short life spans, maybe only 24 hours or a few days. These insects may not live very long once removed from their stream habitat.

Voltinism

Many invertebrates can pass through only a single generation each year (or less), while others are capable of 2 or more generations

Univoltine – one brood or generation per year (most mayflies, caddisflies)

Bivoltine - two broods or generations per year

(baetid mayflies)

Multivoltine - more than two broods or generations per year (some mayflies like Tricorythodes)

Semivoltine - generation time is more than one year

(many stoneflies, dragonflies)

Stress Tolerance

Natural volcanoes, forest fires, floods, landslides

Anthropogenic pollution, removal of water by irrigation, dams, deforestation, removal of riparian vegetation

Freshwater invertebrates vary in their ability to cope with environmental stress

Biomonitoring takes advantage of this situation by identifying whether an aquatic environment is inhabited predominantly by stress tolerant or stress intolerant organisms

Classification of Macroinvertebrates used in Biomonitoring

Kingdom: Animalia

Phylum: Arthropoda (Arthropods)

Annelida (Segmented Worms)

Mollusca (Mollusks)

Group 1 Taxa

Pollution Sensitive Organisms Found In

Good Quality Water

Stoneflies

Mayflies

Water Pennies

Dobsonflies

Riffle Beetles

Mussels

Macroinvertebrates as Indicators

Pollution Sensitive (“Clean Water”)

Benthos

Stonefly Water Penny Beetle Mayfly Dobsonfly

Alderfly Mussel Snipe Fly Riffle Beetle

Group 2 Taxa

Can Exist Under a Wide Range of Water

Quality Conditions

Generally of Moderate Quality Water

Caddisflies

Damselflies

Dragonflies

Blackflies

Craneflies

Water Boatman

Backswimmers

Crayfish

Amphipods

Macroinvertebrates as Indicators

Somewhat Pollution Tolerant

Benthos

Damselfly Dragonfly Crayfish Amphipod

Blackfly Caddisfly Isopod Cranefly

Group 3 Taxa

Can Exist Under a Wide Range of Water

Quality Conditions, Generally are Highly

Tolerant of Poor Quality Water

Midgeflies/Chironomids

Worms

Leeches

Pouch Snails

Macroinvertebrates as Indicators

Pollution Tolerant (“Polluted Water”) Benthos

Pouch Snail Midgefly Worm Leech

The Tolerance Index

0 - 10

0 most pollution sensitive e.g. Stoneflies

10 most pollution tolerant e.g. Midges & Leeches require high DO, clear water, rocky cobble substrate contain hemoglobin, tolerate lower DO, prefer soft substrate, less sensitive to toxins

HBI_MN Tolerance Values

from Joel Chirhart

Ophiogomphus

0

Hesperophylax

2.67

Hexatoma

8.07

Lepidostoma

0.12

Perlodidae

2.68

Stenelmis

8.30

Ephemerella

0.26

Glossosoma

1.14

Baetidae

7.18

Hyalella

7.30

Caenis

8.79

Orconectes

9.41

Acroneuria

2.40

Hydropsychidae

7.55

Physa

10

EPT Tolerance Values Family (Species range)

Ephemerellidae

1 (0-2)

Taeniopterygidae

2 (2-3)

Leptophlebiidae

2 (1-6)

Isonychiidae

2 (2-2)

Baetiscidae

3

Heptageniidae

4 (0-7)

Caenidae

7 (3-7)

Capniidae

1 (1-3)

Leuctridae

0 (0-0)

Perlidae

1 (0-4)

Rhyacophilidae

0 (0-1)

Brachycentridae

1 (0-2)

Limnephilidae

4 (0-4)

Hydropsychidae

4 (0-6)

Other taxa tolerance values, Family (species)

Corydalidae

0 (4)

Gomphidae

1 (1-5)

Aeshnidae

3 (2-6)

Calopterygidae

5 (5-6)

From: Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Freshwaters-

Taxa Tolerance Values, Metric and Protocols (Mandaville 2002)

Elmidae

4 (2-6)

Psephenidae

4 (4-5)

Tipulidae

3 (2-7)

Chironomidae

Tanypodinae (4-10)

Podonominae (1-8)

Simulidae

6 (1-7)

Biological Integrity

“…the capability of supporting and maintaining a balanced, integrated, adaptive community of organisms having a composition, diversity and functional organization comparable to that of natural habitats of the region”

(Karr and Dudley 1981)

J.R. Karr

First developed biotic index for fish

Became multi-metric index

IBIs are now used world-wide for many different taxa

Must be regionally calibrated with reference sites

The Index of Biotic Integrity

(IBI) is useful because…

It is an ensemble of biological information

It objectively defines benchmark conditions

It can assess change due to human causes

It uses standardized methods

It scores sites numerically, describes in narrative form

It defines multiple condition classes

It has a strong theoretical basis

It does not require fine resolution of taxa

Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Heptageniidae sp.

(Mayfly larva)

Hydropsyche sp.

(Caddisfly larva)

Great candidates for biological monitoring…

Perlodidae sp.

(Stonefly larva)

Macroinvertebrates as Indicators

Limited migration patterns – good indicators of localized conditions and site-specific impacts

Integrate effects of human impacts**

Easy to sample and identify

Broad range of habitat requirements and sensitivities to pollution

Integrate effects of human impacts

EPA Recommendations

Build a comprehensive bioassessment data base

Test and validate metrics, or indices, to ensure they are reliable indicators of human disturbance and are able to discern between changes due to natural variability and human activity

Adopt numeric biocriteria for specific waterbody types sequentially into water quality standards as

EPA publishes technical guidance for those waters

For each community characteristic (metric)

1) Does metric respond to stream impairment?

Significant difference in metric between reference and impaired sites?

2) How many metrics “work”?

3) Determine scoring for each metric (continuous or categorical, 0-10?)

4) Combine scores for each metric: total score

5) Determine impairment threshold (standard)

Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity

(B-IBI)

Index based on macroinvertebrate samples that integrates several metrics to produce an overall

“health score” for a given water body

Result: dose-response curves to human impact e.g. Taxa richness, relative abundance of certain taxa, feeding groups

Generalized Plot of B-IBI

Scores vs. Human Impact

Human Impact e.g. Pollution, habitat degradation, flow alteration

SE MN River/Stream

Macroinvertebrate Assessments

Invertebrate Class 2 – Prairie Forest Rivers

Watershed > 500 mi 2 (Cannon, Root, Zumbro)

Invertebrate Class 5 – Southern Streams

(Riffle/Run Habitats)

Watershed < 500 mi 2 (Root, Zumbro)

Invertebrate Class 6 – Southern Forest

Streams (Glide/Pool Habitats)

Watershed < 500 mi 2 (Money, Root, Rush)

Invertebrate Class 9 – Southern Coldwater

Streams

 Size? (Beaver, Pine, Trout, Whitewater, S.Br/S.F. Root)

Macroinvertebrate IBI Metric

Categories

Composition (3 metrics)

Habitat (2 metrics)

Trophic (1 metric)

Tolerance (6 metrics)

Richness (8 metrics)

Class 5 – Southern Streams (Run/Riffle Habitats)

Biocriteria Threshold 35.9 (23.3 – 48.5)

Metric Category Response Description

ClimberCh Habitat

ClingerChTx

Pct

DomFiveCh

Pct

HBI_MN

Habitat

Composition

Tolerance

InsectTxPct Composition

Odonata Richness

Plecoptera Richness

PredatorCh Richness

Tolerant2Ch

TxPct

Tolerance

Trichoptera Richness

Decrease Taxa richness of climbers

Decrease Relative % of taxa adapted to cling to substrate in swift flowing water

Increase

Increase Average tolerance value of individuals in sample (Chirhart)

Decrease Relative % of insect taxa

Decrease Taxa richness of Odonata

Decrease Taxa richness of Plecoptera

Decrease Taxa richness of predators

Increase Relative % of taxa with tolerance values

= or > 6, using MN TVs

Decrease

Realtive abundance (%) of dominant 5 taxa in subsample (Chir genera separate)

Taxa richness of Trichoptera

Download