Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases Jeff Collett and Taehyoung Lee Atmospheric Science Department Colorado State University Funding: USDA/AES and NPS Outline Why measure particles and gases at high time resolution? Examples of previous applications Measurement approach Initial results Summary and future research plans Emissions, transport and deposition of pollutants Atmospheric particles can be emitted directly or produced by reactions in the atmosphere Adverse impacts (health, visibility, ecosystem) occur on local to regional scales Aneja et al. (2006) Particle composition Many particles in polluted atmospheres are combinations of ammonium with sulfate and/or nitrate Northern Front Range Air Quality Study – 1997 Winter Particle formation Gaseous sulfur dioxide reacts to form particulate sulfuric acid/sulfate H2SO4(p) + 2NH3(g) (NH4)2SO4(p) Gaseous nitrogen oxides react to form gaseous nitric acid HNO3(g) + NH3(g) NH4NO3(p) Particulate ammonium nitrate generally forms only when ammonia > sulfate Data from the IMPROVE program http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Default.htm Why measure particles + gases? Particles are regulated – – Regional haze rule Health-based NAAQS Gases are precursors to particle formation Partitioning between gases and particles changes over time Contrasting afternoon visibilities at Great Sand Dunes NP Why measure at high time resolution? Source characterization – – – Emission rates change Upwind composition may change Wind direction changes source influence Ambient air quality – – Pollutant transport changes “Tracking” between species helps us understand composition Example 1. changes in aerosol composition at an agricultural site in Illinois 36 NH4+_ug/m3 NO3-_ug/m3 SO4=_ug/m3 31 Nitrate and sulfate both important 21 – – 16 Acidic sulfate aerosol at times NH4NO3 and (NH4)2SO4 at times 11 6 Date 2/23/2003 2/22/2003 2/21/2003 2/20/2003 2/19/2003 2/18/2003 2/17/2003 2/16/2003 2/15/2003 2/14/2003 2/13/2003 2/12/2003 2/11/2003 2/10/2003 2/9/2003 2/8/2003 2/7/2003 2/6/2003 2/5/2003 2/4/2003 2/3/2003 1 2/2/2003 Concentration, ug/m3 26 Example 2. Southern California mountain wilderness area 700 NH4+, neq/m3 NO3-, neq/m3 SO4=, neq/m3 NH4NO3 particles dominate Large daily variability tied to mountain-valley winds 500 400 300 200 4/27 4/26 4/25 4/24 4/23 4/22 4/21 4/20 4/19 4/18 4/17 4/16 4/15 4/14 4/13 4/12 4/11 4/10 4/9 4/8 4/7 4/6 0 4/5 100 4/4 Concentration, neq/m3 600 Example 3. Yosemite National Park Note “tracking” of sodium and nitrate Nitrate replaced chloride in sea salt HNO3(g) + NaCl(p) NaNO3(p) + HCl(g) 30 25 Cl- NO3- Na+ neq/m3 20 15 10 5 0 8/12 8/13 8/14 8/15 8/16 8/17 8/18 8/19 8/20 8/21 8/22 8/23 8/24 8/25 8/26 8/27 Particle nitrate Fine (submicron) ammonium nitrate particles – – Coarse (supermicron) reacted sea salt or soil dust particles – – – Favored at low T, high RH, high NH3 HNO3(g) + NH3(g) NH4NO3(p) More likely at high T and low NH3 HNO3(g) + NaCl(p) NaNO3(p) + HCl(g) 2 HNO3(g) + CaCO3(p) Ca(NO3)2(p) + CO2 + H2O Lesson: careful characterization of ammonia availability and chemical speciation of particle nitrate key to understanding impacts of agricultural ammonia on regional particle formation Particle nitrate speciation Ca(NO3)2 16% NaNO3 4% NH4NO3 80% NH4NO3 25% Ca(NO3)2 7% Ca(NO3)2 35% NH4NO3 49% Bondville (Feb), f (T, RH) Ca(NO3)2 6% NaNO3 40% NaNO3 44% summer Grand Canyon (May), f (T, RH, Soil) Yosemite (Aug), f (T, RH, Sea salt) Ca(NO3)2 7% NaNO3 9% Ca(NO3)2 15% NH4NO3 36% NaNO3 39% NH4NO3 1% NH4NO3 55% Brigantine (Nov), f (T, RH, Sea salt) NH4NO3 5% Ca(NO3)2 26% Ca(NO3)2 NH4NO3 NaNO3 84% 49% NaNO3 73% San Gorgonio (April), f (T, RH, Sea salt) summer San Gorgonio (July), f (T, RH, Sea salt) 41% NaNO3 54% summer Big Bend (July - Oct), f (T, RH, Sea salt) summer GRSM (Aug), f (T, RH, H+, Soil/sea salt) New continuous measurement applications Modify approach to permit gas + particle measurement at 10-15 min time resolution Measure ammonia emissions from dairies – Make system mobile to permit upwind + downwind measurements Examine impacts of emitted ammonia on airborne particle concentrations Project runs: Fall 2005 – Summer 2008 Conceptual picture +hv, VOC NOx HNO3 + NH3 NH4NO3(p) Measurement approach Collect particles in liquid stream Inject stream into ion chromatograph for chemical analysis Switch between “gas+particle” and “particle only” sampling Field deployment November, 2005 Modified Particle-Into-Liquid Sampler 11/21/2005 12:00 11/21/2005 6:00 11/21/2005 0:00 11/20/2005 18:00 1.5 11/20/2005 12:00 11/20/2005 6:00 11/20/2005 0:00 11/19/2005 18:00 11/19/2005 12:00 11/19/2005 6:00 11/19/2005 0:00 11/18/2005 18:00 11/18/2005 12:00 11/18/2005 6:00 11/18/2005 0:00 11/17/2005 18:00 11/17/2005 12:00 µg/m3 Initial Observations - Sulfate 2.0 Total = particle + SO2 Particle sulfate 1.0 0.5 0.0 11/21/2005 12:00 11/21/2005 6:00 11/21/2005 0:00 11/20/2005 18:00 11/20/2005 12:00 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 11/20/2005 6:00 11/20/2005 0:00 11/19/2005 18:00 11/19/2005 12:00 11/19/2005 6:00 11/19/2005 0:00 11/18/2005 18:00 11/18/2005 12:00 11/18/2005 6:00 11/18/2005 0:00 11/17/2005 18:00 11/17/2005 12:00 µg/m3 Initial Observations - Nitrate Total = particle + HNO3 Particle nitrate 11/21/2005 12:00 11/21/2005 6:00 11/21/2005 0:00 80 11/20/2005 18:00 90 11/20/2005 12:00 11/20/2005 6:00 11/20/2005 0:00 11/19/2005 18:00 11/19/2005 12:00 11/19/2005 6:00 11/19/2005 0:00 11/18/2005 18:00 11/18/2005 12:00 11/18/2005 6:00 11/18/2005 0:00 11/17/2005 18:00 11/17/2005 12:00 µg/m3 Initial Observations – Ammonia 100 Total = particle +NH3 Particle ammonium 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Initial Conclusions Particle nitrate and sulfate agree well with filter measurements Lots of ammonia – – – – >> particle ammonium Denuders to remove NH3(g) last only ~4-5 hours Lose NH3(g) in instrument Change sampler design to better capture NH3(g) 2 P-NO3 P-SO4= T-NO3 T-SO4= 1:1 1.5 URG (ug/m3) 1 0.5 0 0 0.5 1 PILS (ug/m 3) 1.5 2 Summary and future work Nitrate and sulfate important components of airborne particles NH3(g) availability affects particle formation – New approach to semi-continuous particle + gas measurements can help resolve – – Emissions Changes in particle amount and composition due to emissions Modifications are needed to measurement approach to – – BUT, not all particle nitrate is NH4NO3 Improve NH3(g) collection efficiency (steam sampler) Enhance capacity of denuder for NH3(g) removal in particle only measurement Modified instruments will be redeployed – Look at particle and gas concentrations – At high time resolution Over longer periods than feasible for manual filter-pack sampling Evaluate how emissions vary between source types on a dairy