Mary Helen Immordino-Yang, Ed.D • University of Southern California • Neuroscientist – – – – learning creativity culture morality • Role of Emotion in Cognition Two Brain Systems Mutually Exclusive Default Mode (DM) or Intrinsic Network aka “Looking In” Daydreaming/Rest Reflection Off-line consolidation Meditation Abstract Moral Social Emotions Thinking about ONESELF Extrinsic Network aka “Looking Out” External Attention Goal Directed Concentration on a task Social Media Concrete, Physical World Default Mode (DM) Network Social Emotions About other People’s Minds Primary Emotions About other People’s Bodies Brain System PAIN-based emotions REWARDbased emotions Intrinsic Compassion Admiration or Default for Social for Virtue Mode Pain Network Extrinsic Network Compassion Admiration for Physical for Skill Pain Posteromedial Cortices (PMC) of the Parietal Lobe (pink) Introspective Admiration for Virtue & Compassion for Social Pain (AV/CSP, blue → green) Admiration for Skill & Compassion for Physical Pain (AS/CPP, orange → yellow). Immordino-Yang M H et al. PNAS 2009;106:8021-8026 ©2009 by National Academy of Sciences A Better Brain measured by: • The Efficiency with which Brain toggles between DM (Looking In) and Looking Out • The Strength of connectivity between DM regions during “Rest” – Stronger DM connectivity (cross-talk) correlated with Higher IQ – Posses better cognitive abilities for making connections between disparate pieces of information Reflective Pause Activates DM Access to Moral Emotions • Pauses are a behavioral manifestation of DM neural activity • The more a subject reflectively paused – The more cognitively abstract & complex answers – The more DM activity they showed in the scanner when recalling moral emotions – The stronger over DM activity was during rest Emotions Interrupted • The DM is the pathway through which the brain processes social, moral emotions • However, DM is only active when “Looking In” • Highly vulnerable to disruption from environmental distraction—such as: – Educational goals that consistently impose high attention demands – Constant contact with Technology/Phones • Result Young brains stuck in the Concrete! Can Too Much Texting Make Teens Shallow? • Paul Trapnell, PhD, of the University of Winnipeg • Study: Young People Who Text Frequently Focus on Wealth, Image; Less on Moral, Spiritual Goals • 2,300 college students • Ages 18 to 22. • Texting Data collected 2007 – 2011 • (Not clear if texting causes the shallows or if Shallows just text more) • High Levels of Texting were: Positively correlated with Out group prejudice Materialism Negatively correlated with Indigenous groups’ rights Moral reflectiveness Motivation to promote social equality Perceived importance of living with integrity The Marshmallow Test • The Marshmallow Test – YouTube • Distraction/Avoidance strategy worked relatively well at resisting • But children who imagined future possibilities (constructive internal reflection)—ie: how good the 2nd marshmallow would taste, delayed the longest! Cultivate “Looking In” • Healthy Psychological development requires opportunities and skills for “Looking In” • Frame learning environments to teach and practice internal, self-directed processing – HS students who journaled before a test about their beliefs about their test performance scored significantly higher Let the Children Play • Inadequate opportunity for children to play & adolescents to reflect quietly and daydream may have negative consequences— – for social-emotional well-being – for ability to attend to tasks. Wisdom • Reason + Compassion • Dalai Lama Reflects on Compassion • Skilled learner uses these two networks appropriately • Moves between them with ease • Brain toggle skills include: – Gaze aversion – Pause, slowed speech – Closed eyes