EIONET Workshop October 2007 Public Awareness Group 3 Objectives/introduction Measure: Change in behaviour Outcomes Activity Similar indicators Sweden – 2006 assessment of national biodiversity objectives (based on SEBI). Nothing yet for public awareness so used membership of different organisations – increased over the years. Thought about: people watching nature programmes on TV/ visits to NP (no data yet) Switzerland – use membership of NGOs. Studies on topic – evulation of willingness to pay/ perception of flower strips – could go into indicators. Consumption of organic food? Similar indicators Norway - Measure of how many kindergartens/ schools have accessibility to green areas. Could look at NGO membership Iceland – no direct indicators. But have counted number of visitors to national parks/ have good relations with BTCV so links to volunteering/ could use NGO membership Rumania - Public awareness campaign for N2K (public meetings, etc) – impact reported on how information was received, levels of satisfaction on delivery. Similar Indicators Greece – membership of NGOs but not used yet. Slovak Republic – public awareness for N2K (two projects). Do not measure impact on awareness yet. In NPs measure visitor numbers. General awareness is low – tacit knowledge. Estonia – no indicator yet. Could deliver examples form list – e.g. NGO membership, frequency of visits to nature areas (but not all), wildlife gardening, trained staff in Las. Visits to Nature Trails may be a good one to use. Similar Indicators Poland – many countries should have data for publilc awareness. NP visitors, NGO membership – but not used yet. Italy – no targeted indicators for this topic. But local initiatives and could build indicators around visits to NPs. Turkey – some NGO projects on public awareness but no direst Latvia – no indicators yet (some NGO projects) could use visits to NPs, NGO membership Issues Trends into outcomes - how to interpret data? Demographics How do you separate environmental awareness from biodiversity? (c.f. UK volunteering) Collecting data on a regular basis (automatic counting…?) Sampling issues – can you do it? Resources (people/ finances) Definitions and terminologies Ideas into action… Accessibility to nature is a problem – but could be used as an indicator/ or it could be too accessible therefore hard to measure Topic Centre has yet to pursue anything explicitly in relation to public awareness Differences in ‘awareness’ Landscape is more attractive than biodiversity – ref. visitors Recomendations Choose methods that can provide comparisons across countries (questionnaires) Distinguish number of visitors from quality of visitors – more people isn’t necessarily good! Communities of interest/ involvement Biodiversity mentioned in the media – and timeslots Training for stakeholder groups – esp. for journalists Tourism operators – countryside holidays/ eco tourism? Proxy measures – rubbish!! / carbon off-setting School curriculum Accessibility to nature could be used as an indicator Clear definitions of indicators are required (terminology is critical – e.g. NPs) Links to general communication issues (awareness) Organic foods – good links to lifestyle but caveats TRY SOMETHING THEN IMPROVE IT…!!! (JDIDD(Y)N) Problems of definition/ terminology Clear definitions of indicators are required (terminology is critical – e.g. NPs definitions of visitors may/ do vary between countries) NGO memberships – which organisations to include (may also be differences in countries – e.g. hunters, fishermen) Biodiversity…..???? Biodiversity is….(links to awareness) Datasets/database developing and/or developed We like the Eurobarometer! Eurobarometer – like to have something similar at a national level (to increase sample size – 27 countries is only half of Europe). Most direct way to measure we want to measure. DG Environment – make package available to countries? Could have more than one measure because people are different. Could do – favourites: NGO membership, visits, volunteering, organic food - but note caveats (and links to questionnaires) Different pictures from different countries could be OK Has intrinsic interest – at a human (not technological scale – c.f. ‘The Independent’)