1 Units to be accounted for: DM 100% CC 40% BI 100% 50% IN EI WIP-Units 5,000 BI 60,000 57,000 out 8,000 IN WIP-$$ DM $20,000 CC $16,000 57,000*$11.7932 = $672,212.4 out DM $250,000 CC $450,000 DM $33,230.40 8,000*100%*$4.1538 CC $30,557.20 8,000*50%*$7.6393 $63,787.60 BI + IN = EI + Out (?) $36,000 + $700,000 = $672,212.40 + $67,787.60 $736,000 = $736,000 Wtd. Avg. E.U. Out EI EU 8,000*100% 8,000*50% DM 57,000 8,000 65,000 CC 57,000 4,000 61,000 WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD $ to Acct. for BI IN Total $20,000 $250,000 $270,000 $16,000 $450,000 $466,000 $/E.U. Abiqua Acres $270,000/65,000 =$4.1538 $466,000/61,000 =$7.6393 2 $11.7932 per E.U. Abiqua Acres (p. 2) FIFO METHOD E.U. DM WIP Units CC 100% 40% BI 5,000 IN 60,000 DM Out 57,000 BI: (DM) 5,000× 0% -0- BI: (CC) 5,000×60% 3,000 Start & Finish 100% 50% EI 8,000 CC 52,000 EI: (DM) 8,000×100% 52,000 8,000 EI: (CC) 8,000× 50% 4,000 E.U. 60,000 WIP - $ (FIFO) BI DM $20,000 CC $16,000 CC $450,000 Costs to Account For Out DM $ 36,000.00 from BI 22,881.30 Finished CC 5,000×60%×$7.6271 IN DM $250,000 613,277.60 S&F 52,000 × $11.7938 $672,158.90 BI Total $8.00 $12.00 $4.00 $16,000 CC ÷ (5,000× 40%) $ per EU DM $33,333.60 = 8,000 × 100% × $4.1667 $250,000 DM ÷ 60,000 E.U. CC = 8,000 × 50% × $7.6271 $450,000 CC ÷ 59,000 E.U. 30,508.40 CC $ per EU $20,000 DM ÷ (5,000×100%) IN EI 59,000 $4.1667 $7.6271 $11.7938 $63,842.00 $736,000 Costs to Account For (Info we need to do problem) 3 Abtex Electronics SP VC CM Mix Wtd. Avg. CM Tape Recorders $15.00 $8.00 $7.00 1/3 $2.33 Electronic Calculators $22.50 $9.50 $13.00 2/3 $8.67 $11.00 $280,000+ $1,040,000 FC = BE(units) = CM per unit = $11.00 120,000 units 40,000 Tape Recorders 80,000 Electronic Calculators 4 Abtex Electronics (cont.) Tape Recorders DM $4.00 × 90% = DL $2.00 × 110% = VOH Total VC per unit Electronic Calculators $3.60 2.20 2.00 $7.80 DM $4.50 × 80% = DL $3.00 × 110% = VOH Total VC per unit $3.60 3.30 2.00 $8.90 Total Fixed Costs: $ 280,000 1,040,000 57,000 $1,377,000 I made up a big number for “revenue”, likely to be divisible by both $15.00 and $20.00, the 1998 selling prices Sales Mix Calculation: $750,000 20% 80% $150,000 Rev. SP $15 per unit $600,000 Rev. SP $20 per unit 10,000 recorders 30,000 calculators ¼ ¾ Estimated 1998 mix of revenue SALES MIX IN UNITS 5 Abtex Electronics (cont.) (Continued) SP VC CM Mix Wtd. Avg. CM Tape Recorders $15.00 $7.80 $7.20 1/4 $1.800 Electronic Calculators $20.00 $8.90 $11.10 3/4 $8.325 $10.125 FC $1,377,000 = BE(units) = CM per unit = $10.125 136,000 units ¼ 27,200 Tape Recorders ¾ 108,800 Electronic Calculators 6 Adams Co. Has 80,000 lbs. of RM available No more can be purchased Bicycle Frames Set of Golf Clubs $40/unit CM, requires 8 lbs. of RM $32/unit CM, requires 4 lbs. of RM ** Everything they make can be sold!! Bike Frames Golf Clubs $40 / 8 lbs. = $32 / 4 lbs. = $5.00 per lb. CM $8.00 per lb. CM 80,000 lbs. of RM available ÷ 4 lbs. per Set of Golf Clubs = 20,000 Sets of Golf Clubs produced to maximize CM ** What if they can only sell 8,000 Sets of Golf Clubs?? Make 8,000 Sets of Golf Clubs 32,000 lbs. Make 6,000 Bicycle Frames 48,000 lbs. (= 48,000 lbs. / 8 lbs. per unit) 80,000 lbs. 7 Alcatraz Artifacts 1. SP VC CM Mix Wtd. Avg. CM Al $20 $16 $4 2/10 $.80 $ 4.00 Cat $50 $36 $14 3/10 $4.20 $15.00 Raz $40 $28 $12 5/10 $6.00 $20.00 $11.00 $39.00 BE (units) = FC CM per unit = $77,000 = Wtd. Avg. SP 7000 units $11 AL CAT RAZ 20% 30% 50% 1400 + 2100 $28,000 + $105,000 + “Al” “Cat” + 3500 = $7000 $140,000 = $273,000 “Raz” 8 Alcatraz Artifacts (cont.) 2. SP $20 $50 $40 Al Cat Raz BE (units) = VC $16 $36 $28 FC CM per units = CM $4 $14 $12 $77,000 WTD. AVG. CM $1.60 $5.60 $2.40 $9.60 MIX .40 .40 .20 = 8021 units $9.60 Al 40% Cat + Raz 40% + 3,209 + 3208 $64,180 + $160,400 + 20% 1,604 + $64,160 = $288,740 Increased BE point because more low profit “Al’s” were sold. 9 Andretti Company 1. Variable Expenses DM DL VOH VS&A Total $10.00 4.50 2.30 1.20 $18.00 Fixed Expenses OH S&A Total Variable Expenses $300,000 210,000 $510,000 TODAY Sales Vbl CM Fixd NI $1,920,000 (1,080,000) $840,000 (510,000) $330,000 [$32*60,000] [$18*60,000] TOMORROW Sales Vbl CM Fixd NI $2,400,000 (1,350,000) $1,050,000 (590,000) $460,000 $130,000 [$32*75,000] [$18*75,000] [$510,000+$80,000] Yes, the increase in fixed selling expense would be justified. 10 Andretti Company (cont.) 2. Variable Expenses DM DL VOH Duties Selling Total $10.00 4.50 2.30 1.70 3.20 $21.70 A foreign company wants to purchase 20,000 Daks. Breakeven: TR = TC 20,000 x = 20,000 ($21.70) + $9,000 where x is unit selling price 20,000 x = $434,000 + $9,000 20,000 x = $443,000 x = $22.15 selling price / unit 11 Andretti Company (cont.) 3. The relevant cost figure is $1.20 per unit, which is the variable selling expense per Dak. Since the irregular units have already been produced, all production costs (including the variable production costs) are sunk. The fixed selling expenses are not relevent since they will not change regardless of whether or not the irregular units are sold. 12 Andretti Company (cont.) 4. If the plant operates at 30% of normal levels, then only 3,000 units will be produced and sold during the two-month period: 60,000 units per year * 2/12 = 10,000 units sold 10,000 units * 30% = 3,000 units produced and sold. Continue Producing Sales Vbl CM Fixd NI $96,000 [$32*3,000] (54,000) [$18*3,000] $42,000 (85,000) [$510,000*2/12] ($43,000) Shut Down FOH FS&A Total ($30,000) [$300,000*2/12*.60] (28,000) [$210,000*2/12*.80] ($58,000) Net disadvantage of closing plant: ($15,000) 13 Andretti Company (cont.) 5. The relevant costs are those that can be avoided by purchasing from the outside manufacturer. These costs are: DM DL VOH FOH VS&A FS&A Total $10.00 4.50 2.30 3.75 0.40 0.00 $20.95 [($300,000*.75)/60,000] [$1.20*1/3] To be acceptable, the ouside manufacturer's quotation must be less than $20.95 per unit. 14 Apple Appliances You should reject the offer. $10 Variable (relevant) cost to produce the timer assemblies ($5 + $4 + $1) $12 Cost to purchase the timer assemblies $ 2 Cheaper to make the timer assemblies 15 Archer Company a. UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS FG - Mar FG - April 6000 FG - May FG - June Produce 6000 32,000 30,000 8,000 (20% x 40,000) b. RM UNITS RM - April 24,000 lbs. 32,000 x 3 Purchase 105,000 lbs. = 96,000 lbs, 33,000 lbs. (25% x 132,000) BI 8000 Produce 44,000 40,000 60,000 12,000 (20% x 60,000) EI RM UNITS RM UNITS RM - May FG - June 44,000 x 3 = 132,000 16 Astoria Company RM WIP BI $ 9,000 $32,300 (85%) Purch $40,000 $ 5,700 (15%) BI FG $ 20,000 BI 32,300 $ 32,000 140,000 COGM $ 130,000 COGS 45,000 EI $11,000 64,200 EI DL $140,000 EI $ 42,000 $ 21,500 COGS $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 -0- -0- MOH IDM $ 5,700 Mfg Utilities 19,100 Mfg Depr 27,000 IDL 10,000 Prepd Insur I/S 2,400 64,200 $ 64,200 COGS $ 130,000 Depr. Exp. 9,000 Adv. Exp. 48,000 Admin. Salaries 30,000 Prepaid Ins. 600 Misc. S&A 9500 $ 250,000 Sales $ 22,900 NI BT Inc. Tax -0- $ 4,580 $ 18,320 NI AT (to R/E) $ 18,320 -0- 17 Assets (aka: “Pete”) Astoria Co. (p. 2) CASH A/R Beg $ 19,100 Util Cash from Customers ((A/R)) Property, Plant & Equip $ 7,000 245,000 48,000 Advertsng Beg $ 18,000 250,000 (Sales) $ 245,000 (to Cash) Beg $ 290,000 Purch of 9,000 Equip 9,500 Misc S&A 2,000 Prepd Ins End $ 23,000 End $ 219,000 41,000 A/P Prepaid Insurance 84,000 W/P 9,000 Purch PPE Beg 4,580 Inc Tax End Accum. Depr. $ 4,000 2,000 $ 53,000 Beg $ 3,000 36,000 (Depr. Exp.) $34,820 End $ 3,000 $ 89,000 End Liabilities & Owners’ Equity (aka: “Re-Pete”) Accounts Payable Wages Payable $ 38,000 Beg 40,000 OUT (from Cash) $ 41,000 DM Purch $ 37,000 End $ (from Cash) $ 84,000 -045,000 DL 10,000 IDL 30,000 Admin Salaries $ 1,000 Capital Stock $ 160,000 Beg Beg. (implied) End R/E $ 49,000 Beg 18,320 (Net Income) $ 160,000 End $ 67,320 End 18 Astoria Company (p. 3) Cannon Beach Sand Company Balance Sheet As of December 31, 2001 Assets Liabilities & Owners’ Equity Cash $ 34,820 A/R 23,000 Prepd Insur 3,000 PPE 219,000 Accum Depr (89,000) RM 11,000 WIP 21,500 FG 42,000 Total $265,320 A/P W/P C/S R/E $ 37,000 1,000 160,000 67,320 Total $265,320 19 Astoria Company (p. 4) Astoria Company Statement of Cash Flows (Indirect Method) For the Year-Ended December 31, 2001 Operating Activities Net Income $ 18,320 Depr. Exp ↑ A/R (use) ↓ Prepd Ins (source) ↑ DM (use) ↑ WIP (use) ↑ FG (use) ↓ A/P (use) ↑ W/P (source) + 36,000 - 5,000 + 1,000 - 2,000 - 1,500 - 10,000 - 1,000 + 1,000 Net Cash provided by Operating Activities $ 36,820 Investing Activities Purch of Equipment $ - 9,000 Net Cash used by Investing Activities $ (9,000) Net increase in cash $ 27,820 Beg. Cash 7,000 End Cash $ 34,820 Calculation of Free Cash Flows Cash from Operations Less: Capital Expenditures (net) $36,820 9,000 Free Cash Flows $27,820 20 Audio Basics Corporation ACTIVITY: “N” Number of production runs : $400,000 / 50 = $8000 per… “Q” Quality tests performed : $360,000 / 300 = $1200 per… “S” Shipping orders processed : $120,000 / 150 = $800 per… 1. ----- ABC “N” “Q” “S” a. Standard 40 × $8,000 = $ 320,000 180 × $1,200 = $ 216,000 100 × $ 800 = $ 80,000 MOH DM DL Total MFG b. 2. High Grade “N” “Q” “S” $ 616,000 $ 250,000 $ 348,000 $1,214,000 ÷ 320,000 units $3.79375 per unit 10 × $8,000 = $ 80,000 120 × $1,200 = $ 144,000 50 × $ 800 = $ 40,000 MOH DM DL Total MFG $ 264,000 $ 228,000 $ 132,000 $ 624,000 ÷ 100,000 units $6.24 per unit $ 616,000 + 264,000 $ 880,000 ----- Allocated MOH Est. MOH Activity $880,000 = $1.833333 per DL$ $480,000 Standard MOH DM DL Total MFG High Grade $ 638,000 (= $348,000 × $1.833333) $ 250,000 $ 348,000 $1,214,000 ÷ 320,000 units $3.8625 per unit MOH DM DL Total MFG $ 242,000 (= $132,000 × $1.833333) $ 228,000 $ 132,000 $ 602,000 ÷ 100,000 units $6.02 per unit 21 The Baize Company $403,200 Estimated MOH a. = PDOR = Estimated Activity b. = $19.20 per DLH 21,000 DLH Applied MOH = Actual Activity × PDOR 20,000 DLH × $19.20 = $384,000 MOH c. $378,000 $384,000 $6,000 Overapplied $6,000 to COGS -0- 22 1. Ballycanally Corporation DM Price AQ × AC 14,000 × $1.80 $25,200 Qty AQ × SC 14,000 × $1.75 $24,500 SQ × SC × $1.75 (6300)(2) $700 U AQ × SC 13,250 × $1.75 $23,187.50 SQ × SC 12,600 × $1.75 $22,050 $1137.50 U Rate 2. Efficiency DL AQ × AC 4,100 × $9.05 $37,105 $205 U AQ × SC 4,100 × $9.00 $36,900 SQ × SC (2000)(2) × $9.00 $36,000 $900 U 23 Ballycanally Corp. (p. 2) 3. Spending VOH Efficiency AQ × AC AQ × SC 27,750 × $1.22 $33,855 27,750 × $1.20 $33,300 SQ × SC (Applied) 28,000 × $1.20 $33,600 $300 F $555 U $255 U 4. FOH Spending Volume Actual Budget $155,500 $144,000 Applied (SQ × SC) 60,000 × $2.50 $150,000 $6,000 F $11,500 U $5,500 U 24 Barber Company Rate AQ * AP 34,500 * ? Eff AQ * SP 34,500 * ? SQ * SP 35,000 * ? ? = $6.40 $241,500 $220,800 $20,700 u $3,200 F $3,200 / 500 hours = $6.40 25 Beale Street Blues, Inc. DM Price Usage SQ × SC AQ × AC AQ × SC 25,000 × $2.60 25,000 × $2.50 $65,000 $62,500 (7800 units)(3lbs) $2,500 U 1 AQ × SC SQ × SC 23,100 × $2.50 23,400 × $2.50 $57,750 $58,500 DL $750 F Efficiency Rate 2 (7800 units)(5 hrs) AQ × AC AQ × AC SQ x SC 40,100 × $7.30 40,100 × $7.50 39,000 × $7.50 $292,730 $300,750 $292,500 3 $8020 F $8250 U $230 U 4 26 Beale Street Blues (p. 2) VOH Efficiency Spending Actual SQ × SC AQ × SC AQ × AC (7800)(5) 40,100 × $3.00 39,000 × $3.00 $120,300 $117,000 $130,000 $9,700 U $3,300U 5 FOH Volume Spending Actual Budgeted AQ × AC BQ × SC Applied SQ x SC (7800)(5) 40,000 × $4.00 $170,000 39,000 × $4.00 $160,000 $156,000 $10,000 U 6 $4,000 U 7 27 Bee-Cee’s Guitar Emp. (A) JAN JAN Dec. Jan. $100,000×20% $ 60,000×80% FEB Jan. Feb. $ 60,000×20% $ 80,000×80% MAR Feb. Mar. $ 80,000×20% $ 90,000×80% FEB MAR Total $20,000 48,000 $68,000 $12,000 64,000 $76,000 $16,000 72,000 $88,000 $232,000 28 Bee-Cee’s Guitar Emp. (B) JAN JAN Dec. Jan. $70,000×90% $42,000×10% FEB Jan. Feb. $42,000×90% $56,000×10% MAR Feb. Mar. $56,000×90% $63,000×10% FEB MAR Total $63,000 4,200 $67,200 $37,800 5,600 $43,400 $50,400 6,300 $56,700 $167,300 29 Bee-Go Company FG – Feb. FG – Jan. 16,500 15,650 1,650 16,450 15,600 FG – Mar. FG – Apr. 1,600 16,500 16,250 1,650 1,600 1,850 (10%×16,500) (10%×16,000) (10%×18,500) 16,000 18,500 Units Produced Jan. 15,650 Feb. 16,450 Mar. 16,250 Total 48,350 30 Bee-Kill Chemical (A) RM – Q2 RM – Q1 45,000 50,400 (46,000×4 lbs.) 189,400 184,000 60,000 (42,000×4 lbs.) 177,600 RM – Q4 RM – Q3 (50,000×4 lbs.) 186,800 168,000 46,800 200,000 166,800 50,400 60,000 46,800 57,600 (30%×168,000) (30%×184,000) (30%×156,000) (30%×192,000) RM – Q1 (2007) 57,600 (39,000×4 lbs.) (48,000×4 lbs.) 156,000 192,000 RM Purchased Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 189,400 177,600 186,800 166,800 720,600 × $4 $2,882,400 Total pounds of raw materials purchased Cost per pound of raw material Total cost of raw materials purchased 31 Bee-Kill Chemical (B) 2006 Units Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 46,000 42,000 50,000 48,000 DLH × 2.5 DLH per unit = 115,000 105,000 125,000 97,500 442,500 × $20 $8,850,000 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 DLH worked during 2006 DL cost per hour Cost of DLH worked during 2006 32 Bee-Kill Chemical (C) Production Information Quarter 1, 2006 46,000 Quarter 2 42,000 Quarter 3 50,000 Quarter 4 39,000 Total 177,000 1. Units Units Units Units Units Indirect material Indirect labor Utilities Total $2.25 1.50 1.00 $4.75 Fixed Costs per Quarter Per unit Per unit Per unit Per unit Supervisor salaries Factory depreciation Other Total $80,000 30,000 4,100 $114,100 Variable MOH by Qtr. Quarter 1, 2006 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total 2. Variable Costs $218,500 199,500 237,500 185,250 ( = 46,000 units × $4.75) ( = 42,000 units × $4.75) ( = 50,000 units × $4.75) ( = 39,000 units × $4.75) $840,750 Total MOH for 2006 Variable costs Fixed costs $ 840,750 456,400 Total mfg. overhead $1,297,150 ( = $114,100 × 4 Qtrs.) 33 Bee-Safe Company 2004 First quarter Second quarter Third quarter Fourth quarter 21,000 26,000 25,000 30,000 2005 × 130% = 27,300 33,800 32,500 39,000 132,600 × $40 $5,304,000 Unit sales during 2005 Selling price per unit Sales revenue during 2005 34 Belly Rub Productions BELLY RUB PRODUCTIONS Unit Product Cost Data Years 2001 through 2004 2001 Year 2002 2003 2004 Variable manufacturing costs: Direct materials………………………….. $6 $6 $7 $8 Direct labor……………………………… 3 4 4 5 Variable MOH…………………………… 2 2 3 4 Product cost using variable costing………… $11 $12 $14 $17 Add prorated fixed MOH cost……………… 5 6 7 8 Product cost using absorption costing……… $16 $18 $21 $25 BELLY RUB MANUFACTURING Absorption Costing Income Statement For Years 2001 through 2004 2001 2002 Year 2003 Sales………………………………… $200,000 $243,000 $390,000 $350,000 Cost of goods sold………………….. 128,000 158,000 258,000 242,000 Underapplied (overapplied) overhead 0 (12,000) 0 16,000 Gross margin………………………. 72,000 97,000 132,000 92,000 Variable selling and administrative... 24,000 27,000 52,000 50,000 Fixed selling and administrative…… 30,000 35,000 40,000 50,000 Total operating expenses…………… 54,000 62,000 92,000 100,000 Net income………………………… $18,000 $35,000 $40,000 2004 $ (8,000) 35 Belly Rub Productions (p. 2) BELLY RUB MANUFACTURING Variable Costing Income Statement For Years 2001 through 2004 2001 2002 $200,000 $243,000 $390,000 $350,000 88,000 106,000 172,000 164,000 Manufacturing contribution margin ……….. 112,000 137,000 218,000 186,000 Variable selling and administrative ……….. 24,000 27,000 52,000 50,000 Contribution margin ……………….………. 88,000 110,000 166,000 136,000 Fixed manufacturing overhead ……………. 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 Fixed selling and administrative…………… 30,000 35,000 40,000 50,000 Total fixed cost …………………………… 80,000 95,000 110,000 130,000 Net income ……………………………….. $ 8,000 $ 15,000 $ 56,000 $ 6,000 Sales ……………………………………….. Variable product cost ……………………. Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 Year 2003 Belly Rub Productions Schedule of Product Costs with Absorption Costing Years 2001 through 2004 Total Beginning Current Year Product Inventory Production Cost - 0 - + 8,000 units @ $16 $128,000 2,000 units @ $16 + 7,000 units @ $18 $158,000 5,000 units @ $18 + 8,000 units @ $21 $258,000 2,000 units @ $21 + 8,000 units @ $25 $242,000 Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2004 Belly Rub Productions Schedule of Product Costs using Variable Costing Years 2001 through 2004 Total Beginning Current Year Product Inventory Production Cost - 0 - + 8,000 units @ $11 $ 88,000 2,000 units @ $11 + 7,000 units @ $12 $106,000 5,000 units @ $12 + 8,000 units @ $14 $172,000 2,000 units @ $14 + 8,000 units @ $17 $164,000 36 Belly Rub Productions (p. 3) BELLY RUB PRODUCTIONS Schedule of Fixed Overhead Costs Included In Beginning and Ending Inventory Under Absorption Costing Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 Units in beginning inventory … Applied fixed MOH per unit … Equals ………………………. -0- 2,000 $ 5 $10,000 5,000 $ 6 $30,000 2,000 $ 7 $14,000 Units in ending inventory …… Fixed MOH per unit …………. Equals ………………………. 2,000 $ 5 $10,000 5,000 $ 6 $30,000 2,000 $ 7 $14,000 -0- Causes absorption costing NI to be ………………………… $10,000 Higher $20,000 Higher $16,000 Lower $14,000 Lower 37 Spend VOH AQ × AC Benton Company N/A Eff. $25,150 $1,760 U $1,070 U Spend SQ × SC SQ × SC (310) (9) × $8 $22,320 AQ × SC 3,010 × $8 $24,080 N/A Vol. N/A FOH Actual Budget $23,800 $24,300 N/A $500 F Spend TOTAL Applied SQ × SC (310) (9) × $9.00 $25,110 Budget BQ × SC 2,700 × $9 $24,300 $810 F Vol. Eff. $48,950 $47,430 $1760 U $570 U $810 F $1520 U $20,769 / $6.90 = 3010 DLH 310 units actual x 9 hrs. = 2790 hrs. $63 / 9 hrs. = $7 / hr. = DL cost per hr. $45,900 $8 + $9 = 2,700 budgeted DL hrs. 38 B.G. Wip Company Step 1 WIP DM CC 100% 60% 2,000 9,000 100% 1/3 7,700 3,300 Weighted Average Method FIFO Method Step 2 Step 2 FIFO Equivalent Units Wtd. Avg. Equivalent Units OUT EI 3300 × 100% DM CC 7,700 7,700 BI 3,300 3300 × 1/3 E.U. DM 11,000 2,000 × 0% -0- 2,000 × 40% 1,100 S&F 8,800 EI 800 5,700 3300 × 100% 5,700 3,300 1,100 3300 × 1/3 E.U. CC 9,000 7,600 39 Big Dog Foods Standard Allowed for Actual Output pounds Price AQ × AC Quantity / Usage AQ × SC SQ × SC (30)(800) × $0.20 24,000 × $0.20 $4,800 24,500 × $0.20 $4,900 24,500 × $0.19 $4,655 $245 F $100 U $145 F DIRECT MATERIALS – Ground Brown Rice 40 Big Dog Foods (p. 2) Standard Allowed for Actual Output pounds Price AQ × AC Quantity / Usage AQ × SC SQ × SC (30)(200) × $0.40 6,000 × $0.40 $2,400 5,900 × $0.40 $2,360 5,900 × $0.41 $2,419 $59 U $40 F $19 U DIRECT MATERIALS – Chicken Meal 41 Big Dog Foods (p. 3) Standard Allowed for Actual Output DLH Rate AQ × AC Efficiency AQ × SC SQ × SC (30)(8) × $15.00 240 × $15.00 $3,600 300 × $15.00 $4,500 300 × $16.00 $4,800 $300 U $900 U $1,200 U DIRECT LABOR 42 Bob’s Beef Boy DM WIP 0 0 Meat $54,000 $77,500 Lettuce $6,750 Tomatoes $7,500 Kaiser rolls $9,250 $77,500 66,400 FG 0 COGM $210,250 $210,250 $210,250 66,350 0 0 0 DL $66,400 COGS $210,250 $66,400 $210,250 0 MOH I/S Condiments $2,650 Paper $2,400 Utilities $22,500 Grill Depr. $7,000 Rent Cleaning $210,250 $25,000 $6,800 $66,350 Servers $53,000 Mgr. $41,000 Depr. Signs $3,250 Adv. $3,500 $478,800 $311,000 $66,350 $167,800 43 Bojangle Dance Shoes Absorption Costing Variable Costing Income Statement Income Statement For the Year Ended Dec. 31, 2002 For the Year Ended Dec. 31, 2002 Rev. $630,000 Rev. $630,000 COGS: Prime (252,000) VC: Prime (252,000) V.MOH (84,000) V.MOH (84,000) F.MOH (100,000) V.Sell (54,000) GM $194,000 CM $240,000 S&A: V.Sell (54,000) F.Sell (45,000) F.Sell (45,000) F.Adm (90,000) F.Adm (90,000) NI $5,000 FC: F.MOH (100,000) NI $5,000 44 Bosna Corporation Spend Eff AQ * AP AQ * SP $2,450,000 * .5% $12,500 $12,250 $250 u N/A SQ * SP $2,000,000 * .5% SQ * SP $10,000 $2,250 u $2,500 u If you are asked for a "variance" this is it 45 Bowly Company Bowly Company Variable Costing I/S For the Y/E Dec. 31, 2005 Bowly Company Absorption Costing I/S For the Y/E Dec. 31, 2005 Rev $100,000 = 5,000 × $20 Rev $100,000 = 5,000 × $20 - CoGS (60,000) = 5,000 × $12 - VC (50,000) = 5,000 × $10 GM $ 40,000 CM $ 50,000 - S&A (15,000) (10,000) - FC (30,000) (10,000) NI $ 15,000 NI $ 10,000 = 5,000 × $3 MOH S&A The difference in NI equals the change in FG Inventory times the fixed MOH per unit (1,000 × $5 = $5,000) 46 Brötchen Bakery DIRECT MATERIALS Standard Allowed for Actual Output Pounds Price AQ × AC Usage Qty purch = Qty used 30,000 × $2.20 $66,000 AQ × SC SQ × SC 30,000 × $2.00 $60,000 $6,000 U (1,450)(20) × $2.00 $58,000 $2,000 U $8,000 U DIRECT LABOR DLH Rate AQ × AC Efficiency AQ × SC 8,000 × $18.90 $151,200 SQ × SC 8,000 × $18.00 $144,000 $7,200 U (1,450)(5) × $18.00 $130,500 $13,500 U $20,700 U 47 Brötchen Bakery (p. 2) VARIABLE OVERHEAD DLH Spending Efficiency AQ × AC AQ × SC 8,000 × $1.375 $11,000 8,000 × $1.50 $12,000 $1,000 F SQ × SC $150,000 ÷ 100,000 DLH (1,450)(5) × $1.50 $10,875 $1,125 U SQ = Standard Allowed for Actual Output $125 U $300,000 ÷ 100,000 DLH FIXED OVERHEAD DLH Spending Volume Actual Budgeted AQ × SC 8,000 × $3.25 $26,000 8,333.33 × $3.00 $25,000 $1,000 U Applied SQ × SC (1,450)(5) × $3.00 $21,750 $3,250 U 100,000 DLH ÷ 12 months $4,250 U 48 Buffalo Broilers 1. PDOR = Est. MOH / Est. Activity $500,000 / 100,000 DLH = $5.00 per DLH $500,000 / $800,000 = $0.625 per DL$ $500,000 / 80,000 MH = $6.25 per MH 49 Buffalo Broilers (cont.) MOH (DLH) 2. Actual Applied MOH (DL$) Actual Applied .625 * $930,000 $5.00 * 120,000 $576,000 = $600,000 $576,000 $24,000 overapplied = $581,250 $5250 overapplied MOH (MH) Actual Applied $6.25 * 90,000 $576,000 = $562,500 3. $13,500 underapplied $576,000 / 120,000 DLH = $4.80 Actual MOH per Actual DLH 50 California Textbooks (A) TOTAL COSTS RELEVANT ITEMS Outside purchase of parts Direct materials Direct labor Variable overhead Fixed overhead that can be avoided not making Total relevant costs Difference in favor of making Make Buy $160,000 $10,000 $80,000 $40,000 $20,000 $150,000 $160,000 PER-UNIT COSTS Make Buy $16 $1 $8 $4 $2 $15 $10,000 $16 $1 Relevant Benefit so better to MAKE than BUY 51 California Textbooks (B) Rent revenue Contribution margin from other products Buying parts Net relevant costs Make $ --- Buy and leave facilities idle $ --- Buy and use facilities for other products $ --- Buy and rent $5,000 ---(150,000) ($150,000) ---(160,000) ($160,000) 19,000 (160,000) ($141,000) ---(160,000) ($155,000) Best choice is to buy textbook covers and use facilities for other products 52 Candlelight Candles Co. WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD E.U. WIP Units DM WIP - $ (Wtd. Avg.) CC 100% 40% BI 25,000 IN 510,000 Out 523,000 BI DM $42,650 CC $17,152 523,000 * $1.56 = $815,880 100% 80% EI 12,000 DM CC Out OUT 523,000 523,000 EI: (DM) 12000 * 100% 12,000 9,600 EI: (CC) 12000 * 80% IN DM $433,500 E.U. CC $339,690 532,600 535,000 Costs to Account For EI DM $10,680 = 12000 * 100% * $0.89 CC $ 6,432 = 12000 * 80% * $0.67 $17,112 DM BI IN Total CC $42,650 $17,152 $433,500 $339,690 $476,150 $356,842 $/EU DM I have chosen to round to 2 decimal places CC $476,150 / 535,000 = $0.89 $356,842 / 532,600 = $0.67 $1.56 53 Candlelight Candles Co. (p. 2) FIFO METHOD E.U. DM CC WIP Units DM CC 100% 40% BI: (DM) 25,000× 0% BI 25,000 Out 523,000 IN 510,000 BI: (CC) 25,000×60% Start & Finish EI 12,000 CC $ 17,152 CC $339,690 522,600 Costs to Account For DM $ 59,802 from BI 747,000 S&F 498,000 × $1.50 $816,552 BI CC Total $1.715 $3.421 $0.65 $1.50 $ per EU $42,650 DM ÷ (25,000×100%) $1.706 $17,150 CC ÷ (25,000× 40%) IN EI 9,600 Out 9,750 Finished CC 25,000×60%×$0.65 IN DM $433,500 12,000 510,000 WIP - $ (FIFO) DM $ 42,650 498,000 EI: (CC) 10,000× 40% E.U. BI 15,000 498,000 EI: (DM) 10,000×100% 100% 80% -0- $ per EU DM $10,200 = 12,000 × 100% × $0.85 $433,500 DM ÷ 510,000 E.U. CC $ 6,240 = 10,000 × 80% × $0.65 $339,690 CC ÷ 522,600 E.U. $0.85 $16,440 $773,190 Costs to Account For (Info we need to do problem) 54 Cannon Beach Sand Co. DM BI Purch WIP $ 30,000 BI $215,000 $205,000 FG $ 80,000 BI 215,000 $ 110,000 884,000 $ 874,000 COGS 350,000 EI $20,000 289,000 EI DL $884,000 EI $ 120,000 $ 50,000 COGS $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 874,000 $ 874,000 -0- -0- MOH IDM $ 15,000 Fact Mgr Sal 35,000 Fact Ins 14,000 Ptty Tax 6,000 IDL 90,000 Mach Rent 40,000 Fact Util 65,000 Fact Bldg Depr 24,000 I/S $ 289,000 COGS $ 874,000 Sales Comm 150,000 Admin Exp 300,000 Delivery Exp 100,000 Interest Exp 17,500 Loss on Sale of Equip 3,000 $ 1,700,000 Sales $ 255,500 NI BT $ 289,000 Inc. Tax $ 34,100 $ 221,400 NI AT -0- (to R/E) $ 221,400 -0- 55 Assets (aka: “Pete”) Cannon Beach (p. 2) CASH A/R Factory Assets Accum. Depr. Beg $ 37,000 $ 350,000 DL Cash from 1,707,220 Customers ((A/R)) Sale of Equip 40,000 35,000 Fact Mgr Beg $ 127,220 (Sales on Acct.) 1,700,000 $1,707,220 (to Cash) Beg $720,000 Purch of 119,200 Equip Beg $ 264,000 24,000 (Depr. Exp.) $49,000 Sale of Equip $ 6,000 90,000 IDL 150,000 Sales Comm End $ 120,000 End $790,200 End $ 282,000 17,500 Int Exp Short Term Investments 34,100 Tax Exp 743,400 A/P Beg $ 39,000 End $ 39,000 119,200 Purch of Equip End $245,020 Liabilities & Owners’ Equity (aka: “Re-Pete”) Notes Payable Beg A/P $ 350,000 (to Cash) End Common Stock Beg $ 250,000 $ 350,000 R/E Beg $ 240,720 221,400 (Net Income) $ 743,400 $ 38,500 Beg. 205,000 DM 15,000 IDM 14,000 Fact Ins 6,000 Ppty Taxes 40,000 Mach Rent 65,000 Fact Util 300,000 Admin Exp 100,000 Delivery Exp $ 40,100 End $ 250,000 End $ 462,120 End 56 Cannon Beach (p. 3) Cannon Beach Sand Company Balance Sheet As of December 31, 2005 Assets Liabilities & Owners’ Equity Cash $ A/R S/T Investmts Plant Assets Accum Depr DM WIP FG 245,020 120,000 39,000 790,200 (282,000) 20,000 50,000 120,000 Total $1,102,220 N/P A/P C/S R/E $ 350,000 40,100 250,000 462,120 Total $1,102,220 57 Cannon Beach (p. 4) Cannon Beach Sand Company Statement of Cash Flows (Indirect Method) For the Year-Ended December 31, 2005 Operating Activities Net Income $ 221,400 Depr. Exp ↓ A/R (source) ↑ A/P (source) ↓ DM (source) ↓ WIP (source) ↑ FG (use) Loss on Equip Sale + 24,000 + 7,220 + 1,600 + 10,000 + 30,000 - 10,000 + 3,000 Net Cash provided by Operating Activities Calculation of Free Cash Flows Cash from Operations Less: Capital Expenditures (net) $287,220 (79,200) Free Cash Flows $208,020 $ 287,220 Investing Activities Sale of Equipment Purch of Equipment $ 40,000 - 119,200 Net Cash used by Investing Activities $ (79,200) Net increase in cash $ 208,020 Beg. Cash 37,000 End Cash $ 245,020 Not specifically requested by problem; already calculated CF using Direct Method. 58 Carwash Company (A) Present 0 Investment Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 $(100,000) $ 40,000 $15,000 Savings Total $(60,000) $15,000 PV Factor × 1.0000 × 3.7908 NPV Calc. $(60,000) + $56,862 From PV of Annuity Table = $(3,138) < $0 59 Carwash Company (B) The higher the interest rate, the lower the Present Value Correct Answer: 12% Present 0 Investment YES, the investment should be made. Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 $4,000 $4,000 $5,000 $8,000 $(15,403) Savings Total $(15,403) $4,000 $4,000 $5,000 $8,000 PV Factor × 1.0000 × 0.8929 × 0.7972 × 0.7118 × 0.6355 NPV Calc. $(15,403) $3,571.60 $3,188.80 $3,559.00 $5084.00 ≈ $0 difference $15,403.40 60 Cass Company 1. DM $210,000 DL 140,000 VOH 2. Sales $500,000 Loss: COGS: 30,000 $380,000 3. Sales $500,000 Less: VC: $210,000 DL 140,000 VOH 30,000 2. FOH $50,000 ($430,000) GM 4. $ 70,000 DM $210,000 DL 140,000 VS&A ( 20,000) 30,000 FS & A ( 60,000) VOH VS & A 5. DM $20,000 Profit (400,000) CM $100,000 BE ($) = FC BE ($) = CM Ratio $110,000 $( 10,000) = $110,000 $100,000/$500,000 = $550,000 1/5 6. Operating Leverage = CM/NI = $100,000/10,000 = 10 61 Cattle Company (1997) Inventory Accounts Product Costs BI + In = EI + Out DM $96,000 Purch $202,000 $190,000 WIP $71,000 190,000 130,000 119,000 FG COGM $45,000 $445,000 $408,000 COGS $445,000 $82,000 $65,000 $108,000 COGS DL $130,000 $130,000 $408,000 $408,000 ACOGS 0 MOH I/S $15,000 104,000 $119,000 $408,000 $119,000 Period Costs Admin. $566,000 Rev. $135,000 -0$23,000 NI 62 Cattle Company 1998 Inventory Accounts Purch Product Costs DM BI + In = EI + Out WIP $108,000 $65,000 $229,000 235,000 $235,000 170,000 FG COGM $562,000 $82,000 $562,000 COGS $575,000 $69,000 176,000 $102,000 COGS DL $84,000 $575,000 $170,000 $575,000 ACOGS $170,000 I/S 0 $575,000 MOH Period Costs $812,000 Rev. Admin. $161,000 $18,000 $76,000 158,000 $176,000 0 NI $176,000 63 Chain Saw Company 1. Y= a + bx b = hi-low $ hi-low Activity b = $80,630 - $45,380 986 – 486 b = $70.50 per testing hour $80,630 = a + $70.50 (986) $80,630 = a + $69,513 a = $11,117 Cost Formula y = $11,170 + $70.50x 2. y = $11.17 + $70.50 (800) y= $11.17 + $56,400 y= $67,517 64 Chain Saw Company (cont.) CHAIN SAW COMPANY Regression Analysis SUMMARY OUTPUT J F M A M J J A S O N D Y = Costs X = Hours $54,235 640 $59,520 722 $45,380 486 $64,000 886 $59,235 634 $73,060 812 $81,625 927 $80,630 986 $75,105 958 $63,970 819 $67,350 856 $55,285 546 Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.915652697 R Square 0.838419862 Adjusted R Square 0.822261848 Standard Error 4677.027055 Observations 12 ANOVA df Regression Residual Total Intercept X = Hours Cost Function: 1 10 11 SS MS 1135045702 1135045702 218745820.7 21874582.07 1353791523 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat 17431.74361 6733.347046 2.588867542 61.49849834 8.537441076 7.203387736 F Significance F 51.88879487 2.91444E-05 P-value 0.027002373 2.91444E-05 Lower 95% Upper 95% 2428.90886 32434.57837 42.47589089 80.52110579 y = $61.50 x + $17,431.74 when x = 800 y = $66,631.74 65 CM Ratio = CM = Sales 1. Clair’s Toys 60% VC = 40% of sales $12,000 x .60 = $7,200 2. Sales $9,000 NO x .60 3. CM $5,400 FC (6,000) NI ($600) BE ($) = FC = $3,000 = $5,000 CM Ratio 4. = .60 Before Rev. $5,000 After $120,000 x .60 [12,000 x $10] Rev. $144,000 72,000 (VCU = $4) CM $72,000 CM $72,000 FC 18,000 FC (20,000) NI $54,000 NI $52,000 NO [18,000 X $8] (18,000 x $4 from “Before”) 66 The Costume Company $800,000 ÷ $8.00 = 100,000 expected (budgeted) DLH … 4 DLH per unit FIXED OVERHEAD WHERE: BQ = Budgeted Qty. × Std. Allowed Spending Actual FOH $802,000 Volume Budgeted FOH BQ × SP $800,000 $2,000 U Applied FOH SQ × SP (25,250)(4) × $8 $808,000 $8,000 F $6,000 F Flexible Budget Variance = $2,000 U 67 Cowboy Boots Co. Standard Allowed for Actual Output yards Price AQ × AC Quantity / Usage AQ × SC 10,000 × $8.00 10,000 × $9.00 $80,000 $90,000 SQ × SC $10,000 F 11,000 × $9.00 (7,000)(1.5) × $9.00 10,500 × $9.00 $94,500 $99,000 $4,500 U CAN’T! DIRECT MATERIALS DM Purchased ≠ DM Used 68 Cowboy Boots Co. (p.2) Standard Allowed for Actual Output DLH Rate AQ × AC Efficiency AQ × SC 3,800 × $15.50 3,800 × $15.00 $58,900 $57,000 $1,900 U SQ × SC (7,000)(0.5) × $15.00 3,500 × $15.00 $52,500 $4,500 U $6,400 U DIRECT LABOR 69 Cox Company Price AQ * AP 18,000 * $3.60 Quantity/ Usage AQ * SP SQ * SP SP = $3.40 18,000 * SP $61,200 $64,800 $3,600 u AQ * SP 15,000 * $3.40 $51,000 SQ * SP 16,000 * $3.40 $54,400 $3,400 F 70 The Cutters (A) Est. MOH PDOR = 780,000,000 = Est. Activity = 78,000 per DLH 10,000 DLH 78,000 per DLH × 80 DLH = 6,240,000 pesos applied to The Hunter 78,000 per DLH × 400 DLH = 31,200,000 pesos applied to The Carver The Hunter (pesos) Sales Cost: Direct materials Direct labor Mfg. overhead Gross profit 19,500,000 (4,500,000) (1,200,000) (6,240,000) 7,560,000 The Carver (pesos) 53,000,000 Sales Cost: Direct materials Direct labor Mfg. overhead Gross profit (10,000,000) ( 6,000,000) (31,200,000) 5,800,000 71 The Cutters (B) Use these rates to assign overhead to The Hunter and to The Carver Manufacturing Overhead Pool Cost Driver Allocation Base Application Rate Pool 1: 75,000,000 pesos 750,000 Number of parts 75,000,000 ÷ 750,000 = 100 pesos per part Pool 2: 100,000,000 pesos 25 Number of production runs 100,000,000 ÷ 25 = 4,000,000 pesos per production run Pool 3: 350,000,000 pesos 2,000 Number of machine hours 350,000,000 ÷ 2,000 = 175,000 pesos per machine hour Pool 4: 100,000,000 pesos 25,000 Number of components tested 100,000,000 ÷ 25,000 = 4,000 pesos per component tested Pool 5: 155,000,000 pesos 10,000 Number of direct labor hours 155,000,000 ÷ 10,000 = 15,500 pesos per direct labor hour 72 The Cutters (B) (p. 2) THE HUNTER Allocation Rate Activity Pool 1: 100 pesos per part 15,000 units × 3 parts per unit Pool 2: 4,000,000 pesos per production run Pool 3: 175,000 pesos per machine hour THE CARVER Allocation Rate Activity Cost (pesos) 4,500,000 Pool 1: 100 pesos per part 100,000 units × 1 part per unit 10,000,000 1 production run 4,000,000 Pool 2: 4,000,000 pesos per production run 1 production run 4,000,000 16 machine hours 2,800,000 Pool 3: 175,000 pesos per machine hour 48 machine hours 8,400,000 Pool 4: 4,000 1,000 pesos per component tested components tested 4,000,000 Pool 4: 4,000 100 pesos per component tested components tested Pool 5: 15,500 pesos per direct labor hour 1,240,000 Pool 5: 15,500 pesos per direct labor hour 80 direct labor hours Total mfg. overhead for 15,000 Hunters Manufacturing overhead per cutter Cost (pesos) 16,540,000 1,203 (Rounded) 400 direct labor hours 400,000 6,200,000 Total mfg. overhead for 100,000 Carvers 29,000,000 Manufacturing overhead per cutter 290 73 The Cutters (B) (p. 3) PROFIT PER ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING The Cutters (B) The Hunter (pesos) Sales Cost: Direct materials Direct labor Mfg. overhead Gross profit 19,500,000 (4,500,000) (1,200,000) (16,540,000) (2,740,000) The Carver (pesos) 53,000,000 Sales Cost: Direct materials Direct labor Mfg. overhead Gross profit (10,000,000) ( 6,000,000) (29,000,000) 8,000,000 PROFIT PER JOB-ORDER COSTING The Cutters (A) The Hunter (pesos) Sales Cost: Direct materials Direct labor Mfg. overhead Gross profit 19,500,000 (4,500,000) (1,200,000) (6,240,000) 7,560,000 The Carver (pesos) 53,000,000 Sales Cost: Direct materials Direct labor Mfg. overhead Gross profit (10,000,000) ( 6,000,000) (31,200,000) 5,800,000 74 Cutting Edge Skis WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD E.U. WIP Units DM 50% WIP - $ (Wtd. Avg.) CC 30% BI 200 IN 5000 BI Out 4800 DM $3000 CC $1,000 4800 * 30.014 = $144,067.20 40% 25% EI 400 CC OUT 4800 4800 EI: (DM) 400 * 40% 160 100 EI: (CC) 400 * 25% IN DM $74,000 CC DM Out E.U. 70,000 4900 4960 Costs to Account For EI DM $2,483.84 = 400 * 40% * $15.524 CC $1,449.00 = 400 * 25% * $14.490 $3,932.84 DM BI IN Total CC $3,000 $1,000 $74,000 $70,000 $77,000 $71,000 $/EU Shaping and Milling Dept. November 1997 (Round to 3 decimal places) DM CC $77,000 / 4960 = $15.524 $71,000 / 4900 = $14.490 $30.014 75 Cutting Edge Skis (p. 2) FIFO METHOD E.U. DM CC WIP Units DM CC 50% 30% BI: (DM) 200 × 50% BI 200 IN 5000 EI 400 100 BI: (CC) 200 × 70% Out 4800 140 Start & Finish 4,600 EI: (DM) 400 × 40% 40% 25% 160 EI: (CC) 400 × 25% 100 E.U. 4,860 WIP - $ (FIFO) BI DM $3,000 CC $1,000 $ 4,000.00 from BI CC $70,000 4,840 Costs to Account For Out 1,522.60 Finished DM 200×50%×$15.226 2,024.82 Finished CC 200×70%×$14.463 IN DM $74,000 4,600 136,569.40 S&F 4,600 × $29.689 DM BI CC Total $16.667 $46.667 $14.463 $29.689 $ per EU $3,000 DM ÷ (200×50%) $30 $1,000 CC ÷ (200×30%) $144,116.82 IN $ per EU EI DM $2,436.16 = 400 × 40% × $15.226 $74,000 DM ÷ 4,860 E.U. CC $1,446.30 = 400 × 25% × $14.463 $70,000 CC ÷ 4,840 E.U. $15.226 $3,882.46 $148,000 Costs to Account For (Info we need to do problem) 76 Deering Banjo Company CM MIX WTD. AVG. CM $700 $500 60% $300 $720 2000 $3000 40% $1200 $2000 $1500 $2720 SP VC Boston $1200 Deluxe $5000 1. BE (units) = FC = $3,000,000 CM per unit 2,000 units = WTD. AVG. SP 2,000 units BE $1500 60% Boston = 1200 Boston = 1200 Boston 40% Deluxe = 800 Deluxe Deluxe = 800 2000 units total @ BE 2. BE ($) = FC CM Ratio = $3,000,000 = $1500/$2720 $3,000,000 .55 = $5,440,000 BE($) -- OR --1200 x $1200 = $1,440,000 800 x $5000 = 4,000,000 $5,440,000 77 Duo Company 2. $4.00 (SP) Q=DLH Eff Rate $760,000 ÷ 190,000 AQ x AP 190,000 x $4.00 $760,000 $900,000 1,500,000 × 150/1000 1,200,000 x 150/1000 = AQ x SP 190,000 × $4.00 GIVEN = 180,000 SQ x SP $760,000 180,000 X $4.00 $720,000 $0 $40,000 U 1. FC $150,000 VC $720,000 $870,000 78 East Meets West (A) 1. BE (units) = BE ($) 2. = BE (units) = BE ($) = FC + NI = CM per Units FC + NI CMR = $20,000 ($10 - $6) = 5,000 units $20,000 ( $4 / $10) = $50,000 = 8,750 units = $87,500 FC + NI = $20,000 + $15,000 CM per Units $4 FC + NI CMR = $20,000 + $15,000 0.4 79 East Meets West (B) 1. SP(X) = FC + VC(X) + NI $10(X) = $20,000 + $6(X) + .15($10)(X) $10(X) = $20,000 + $6(X) + $1.50(X) $2.50(X) = $20,000 X= 8000 units * $10ea. = $80,000 Sales = FC + VC + NI Sales = $20,000 + .60(Sales) + .15(Sales) .25(Sales) = $20,000 Sales = $80,000 80 East Meets West (C) 1. BE(units) = FC + NI = $18,000 + $9,000 = $27,000 CM per unit $10.40 - $6.80 $3.60 = BE ($) = FC + NI CMR 7500 units = $18,000 + $9,000 = $27,000 $10.40 - $6.80 0.346 $10.40 = $78,000 81 East Meets West (D) 1. NIBT = BE(units) = BE ($) = NI AT 1 - TR = $8,400 0.7 = $12,000 NIBT FC + NI = $20,000 + $12,000 = CM per unit $4 FC + NI CMR = $20,000 + $12,000 = 0.4 8000 units $80,000 82 East Meets West (E) Current BE ($) = FC + NI = $20,000 + $12,000 = $80,000 CMR 0.4 New BE ($) = FC + NI = $27,500 + $12,000 = $79,000 0.5 CMR This seems better because EMW does not need earn as much revenue to achieve its target profit BUT! Current BE ($) = FC + NI = CMR $20,000 0.4 = $50,000 New BE ($) = FC + NI = CMR $27,500 0.5 = $55,000 Current MS Ratio = Actual Rev. – BE Rev. = $80,000 - $50,000 = .375 Actual Rev. $80,000 New MS Ratio = Actual Rev. – BE Rev. = $79,000 - $55,000 = .304 Actual Rev. MORE RISKY $79,000 83 Fast Company VARIABLE-COSTING INCOME STATEMENTS 2002 Sales $1,500,000 Less variable expenses: Variable cost of goods sold a (900,000) Variable selling and administrative b (37,500) Contribution margin $ 562,500 Less fixed expenses: Fixed overhead (150,000) Fixed selling and administrative (50,000) Net income $ 362,500 a 2002: $6.00 × 150,000 = $ 900,000 2003: $6.00 × 100,000 = $ 600,000 2004: $6.00 × 200,000 = $1,200,000 b $0.25 per unit × Units sold 2003 2004 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 (600,000) (25,000) $ 375,000 (1,200,000) (50,000) $ 750,000 (150,000) (50,000) $ 175,000 (150,000) (50,000) $ 550,000 $4.00 + $1.50 + $0.50 = $6.00 84 Fast Company (p. 2) ABSORPTION-COSTING INCOME STATEMENTS Sales Less cost of goods sold: Variable manufacturing expense a Fixed manufacturing expense b Gross margin Less selling and admin. expenses: Variable selling and admin.c Fixed selling and admin. Net income a 2002: $6.00 × 150,000 = $ 900,000 2003: $6.00 × 100,000 = $ 600,000 2004: $6.00 × 200,000 = $1,200,000 b 2002: $1.00 × 150,000 = $ 150,000 2003: $1.00 × 100,000 = $ 100,000 2004: $1.00 × 200,000 = $ 200,000 c 2002 2003 2004 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 (900,000) (150,000) $ 450,000 (600,000) (100,000) $ 300,000 (1,200,000) (200,000) $ 600,000 (37,500) (50,000) $ 362,500 (25,000) (50,000) $ 225,000 (50,000) (50,000) $ 500,000 FOH per unit = Est. FOH = Normal volume $150,000 150,000 = $1.00 per unit $0.25 per unit × Units sold $4.00 + $1.50 + $0.50 = $6.00 85 Fools Gold Jewelry Standard Allowed for Actual Output ounces Price AQ × AC Quantity / Usage AQ × SC 663 × $300 663 × $295 $198,900 $195,585 $3,315 U SQ × SC (1,300)(0.5) × $295 650 × $295 $191,750 $3,835 U $7,150 U DIRECT MATERIALS 86 Frodo Company There are two ways students can approach this problem. Costs Operating costs Depreciation (NOT RELEVANT) Resale of old Purchase of new _______ _______ Keep Old ($75,000) ($30,000) Buy New ($20,000) ($30,000) $ 2,000 ($40,000) ($105,000) ($88,000) Incremental Change in operating cost $11,000 × 5 years = Resale of old machine Cost of new machine (Cost) or Savings $17,000 savings! $ 55,000 $ 2,000 ($40,000) $ 17,000 87 Funk and Wagnall Relevant Opportunity 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Outlay Irrelevant Outlay Sunk X (1.) X (2.) X (3.) X (4.) X (5.) X (6.) X (7.) X (8.) X X (9.) X (10.) 88 Gee-Whiz Shoes Standard Allowed for Actual Output DLH Rate AQ × AC Efficiency AQ × SC 9,500 × $18.00 $171,000 9,500 × $18.20 $172,900 $1,900 U SQ × SC (20,000)(0.5) × $18.00 650 × $295 $180,000 $9,000 F $7,100 F DIRECT LABOR 89 Halo Products Company A. $200,000 Est. MOH PDOR = = 32,000 Est. Activity = $6.25 B. Applied MOH = PDOR * Actual Activity = 36,400 $6.25 * = $227,500 C. MOH Actual Applied $256,200 Underapplied $227,500 $28,700 D. $256,200 / 36,400 = $7.04 90 Hannibal Company WIP DM BI FG $6,520 $23,400 Purch $160,000 150,000 $40,000 150,000 100,000 326,000 308,950 326,000 76,978 $33,400 57,050 $7,498 DL $100,000 COGS $100,000 0 308,950 MOH IDL $20,000 Rent 21,000 Depr 30,000 Util . 5,978 308,950 0 I/S $308,950 76,978 Sales Sp;amoes $55,000 76,978 Sales Comm. 38,000 0 Admin. 61,000 $600,000 Sales Rev $137,050 NI 91 Hassett Company 1998 budget requires 20,000 handles for use in the production of pots. Costs to manufacture the handles is as follows: DM $.60 DL $.40 VOH $.10 FOH $.20 Total $1.30 R&M Steel Co. has offered to supply handles for $1.25 each. Should Hassett MAKE or BUY? MAKE! $1.10 < $1.25 DM, DL, VOH = relevant costs that change 92 The Hat Source 1. BE(units) = BE($) = 2. FC + NI CM per unit FC + NI CM Ratio = 12,500 units $30 - $18 $150,000 +$0 FC + NI CM Ratio FC + NI BE(units) = CM per unit BE($) = $150,000 + $0 = = = $375,000 40% $150,000 + $30,000 = = 15,000 units $30 - $18 $150,000 +$30,000 = = $450,000 40% 93 Herd Company Spend Eff N/A VOH AQ * AP AQ * SP Spend SQ * SP N/A SQ * SP $3.00 Volume FOH Actual Budgeted Budgeted 50,000 * $6,000 $300,000 SQ * SP Applied 42,000 $6.00 $252,000 $48,000 u 94 Herman Company VOH Efficiency Spending N/A SQ x SP AQ x AP AQ x SP 121,000 x $.50 $131,000 SQ x SP 115,000 x $.50 115,000 x $.50 $57,500 $60,500 $3,000U FOH Spending Actual N/A Volume Budgeted Budgeted $110,000 $110,000 Applied SQ x SP ($1) 115,000 $5,000 F TOTAL Spending $178,500 Efficiency Volume $179,500 $8000 U $172,500 $3,000U $5,000 F 95 Holland Company The cost of a single unit of product under the two costing methods would be: Absorption Variable Costing Costing $5.00 $5.00 DM, DL & Vbl MOH Fixed MOH ($15,000/5,000 units) Total cost per unit Absorption costing Sales (@ $15.00) Less COGS: Beg. Inv. (@ $8.00) COGM (@ $8.00) CGAS End. Inv. (@ $8.00) COGS Gross Margin Less S&A Net Income $3.00 $8.00 $5.00 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total $75,000 $60,000 $90,000 $225,000 0 40,000 40,000 0 40,000 35,000 26,000 $9,000 0 40,000 40,000 8,000 32,000 28,000 25,000 $3,000 8,000 40,000 48,000 0 48,000 42,000 27,000 $15,000 0 120,000 120,000 0 120,000 105,000 78,000 $27,000 96 Holland Company (p. 2) Variable costing Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Sales (@ $15.00) Less vbl. exp: Vbl COGS (@ $5.00) Vbl S&A (@ $1.00) Total vbl. exp. Contribution margin Less fixed exp: MOH S&A exp. Total fixed exp. Net income $75,000 $60,000 $90,000 $225,000 25,000 5,000 30,000 45,000 20,000 4,000 24,000 36,000 30,000 6,000 36,000 54,000 75,000 15,000 90,000 135,000 15,000 21,000 36,000 $9,000 15,000 21,000 36,000 $0 15,000 21,000 36,000 $18,000 45,000 63,000 108,000 $27,000 A reconciliation of the net income figures for the two methods over the three year period follows: Year 1 Variable costing NI Add: FOH cost deferred in inv. under absorp. costing (1,000 units x $3.00) Less: FOH cost released from inv. under absorption costing (1,000 x $3.00) Absorption costing NI $9,000 Year 2 $0 Year 3 $18,000 3,000 $9,000 $3,000 (3,000) $15,000 97 Home Quality Products 1. Prevention Costs: b. Seminar costs for “Vendor Day”. Appraisal Costs: c. Costs of conformance tests at Charlotte plant. e. Costs of inspection tests at the Raleigh packaging plant. Internal Failure Costs: a. Labor and materials costs of reworking a batch of steam-iron handles. External Failure Costs: d. Replacement cost of 1,000 steam-irons sold in the Pittsburgh are. 2. The cost of customer ill-will created by the sale of defective products has two components: (a) (b) The volume of future lost sales, The contribution margin on lost sales. Customer surveys and interviews with distributors and retailers can provide a way to estimate (a); (b) can be estimated using internal accounting information. 98 Houghton’s Limited 1. BE (units) = FC = $30,000 CM per unit BE ($) = 2. BE ($) 3. MS ($) FC CM ratio = MS Ratio = 2000 units = $70,000 $35-$20 = $30,000 $35-$20 $35 FC + NI CM ratio = ($30,000 X 12) + $510,000 = $2,030,000 $35-$20 $35 = Actual Rev. – BE Rev. = $2,030,000 – ($70,000 x 12) = $2,030,000 - $840,000 = $1,190,000 = Actual Rev. – BE Rev. Actual Rev. = $2,030,000 - $840,000 = 58.6% = $1,440,000 $2,030,000 4. Operating Income = BE (units) = FC + NI CM per unit NIAT = $864,000 I – TR = 1 - .4 = $360,000 + $1,440,000 = 120,000 units annually, 99 $35-$20 10,000 units monthly The Hour Record Distance traveled is the ‘score,’ determining who wins and who doesn’t, and seems to be best considered a financial measure. Net income or cash flow if you will. This is a historical measure; at any point in time this measure only tells you what has occurred in the past. Bicycle speed is the predictive of what ‘score’ will be achieved. Measures that do this can be both financial (expected sales in dollars) and nonfinancial (expected sales in units). Heart Rate is a measure of current effort, such as the amount (in units or dollars) of materials, labor and/or overhead being used in production. In general, with heart rate and with materials usage, lower is better. Again, this is a historical measure but is predictive to the degree that heart rate this minute will be the same as heart rate the next minute. Human body efficiency decreases over time, so heart rate will increase over time, but business efficiency should increase over time, and the corresponding efficiency measures should improve. Can a target (or budgeted) distance be useful in this scenario? Or at least knowledge of the last record set? If after 30 minutes the rider is less than halfway toward the old record, someone should determine if the record can realistically be equaled or broken. If the record is unrealistic, the rider might as well cut his or 100 her losses and save the energy for another task. Howdy Company A – machine hours 1. 2. 3. B – DL$ $602,000 / 70,000 = $8.60 / hr $735,000 / $420,000 = 1.75% 110 * $8.60 = $946.00 $680 * 1.75 = $1,190.00 DM $470 DL 290 MOH 946 DM 332 DL 680 MOH 1190 $2,202 $1,706 MOH 4. $1706 + $2202 = $3908 / 50 units = $78.16 MOH (65,000 * $8.60) $570,000 $946 + $1190 = $2,136 559,000 ($436,000 * 1.75) $750,000 $763,000 $11,000 $13,000 overapplied underapplied $4,000 $13,000 0 COGS $11,000 0 COGS $13,000 101 J.B. Goode Company 1. PDOR = Est. MOH = $135,000 = $13.50 per DLH Est. Activity Standard 10,000 [Applied MOH = Actual Activity × PDOR] 900 units × 10 DLH = 9000 DLH ×$13.50 $121,500 Applied MOH Custom [Applied MOH = Actual Activity × PDOR] 100 units × 10 DLH = 1000 DLH ×$13.50 $13,500 Applied MOH This part of the calculation is a little unusual because we are using actual MOH in the calculation rather than estimated MOH 102 J.B. Goode Company (p. 2) 2. STANDARD [Applied MOH = Actual Activity × PDOR] Depr. Maint. Purch. Insp. IDM Super. Supplies 3,000 9,000 1,500 400 900 400 900 × × × × × × × $10.00 $ 1.50 $11.00 $12.00 $15.00 $28.00 $ 3.00 = = = = = = = $30,000 13,500 16,500 4,800 13,500 11,200 2,700 $92,200 Applied MOH ÷ 900 Guitars = $102.45 each CUSTOM [Applied MOH = Actual Activity × PDOR] Depr. Maint. Purch. Insp. IDM Super. Supplies 1,000 1,000 500 600 100 600 100 × × × × × × × $10.00 $ 1.50 $11.00 $12.00 $15.00 $28.00 $ 3.00 = = = = = = = $10,000 1,500 5,500 7,200 1,500 16,800 300 $42,800 Applied MOH ÷ 100 Guitars = $428 each 103 J.B. Goode Company (p. 3) 3. Custom OLD WAY DM DL MOH TOTAL $375 $240 $135 $750 Custom NEW WAY DM DL MOH TOTAL $ 375 $ 240 $ 428 $1,043 NO ... $1,000 Revenue does not cover the manufacturing expense The single biggest reason for the higher overhead cost is the supervision required for the custom guitars. 104 Joe Slow R 1.__________ 2.__________ R R 3.__________ I 4.__________ R 5.__________ I 6.__________ R 7.__________ I 8.__________ R 9.__________ The cost of traveling the 250 miles to Finding Foodstore. The time he will spend on the road. The time he will spend visiting with Finding Foodstore executives. The amount of time already devoted to Finding Foodstore. The revenue potential from Finding Foodstore. The cost of his last visit to Finding Foodstore. The probability that his visit will result in new sales. The cost of lunch for himself if he visits Finding Foodstore. The cost of lunch he would buy for Finding Foodstore executives. 105 The John Company WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD DM WIP Units CC 100% 60% E.U. BI 5,000 DM Out IN 40,000 35,000 OUT 35,000 EI: (DM) 10,000 × 100% 10,000 CC 35,000 EI: (CC) 10,000 × 40% 100% 40% EI 10,000 E.U. 4,000 39,000 45,000 Costs to Account For DM WIP - $ (Wtd. Avg.) BI DM $5,050 CC $3,270 Out 35,000 × $2.42 = $84,700 BI IN Total CC $5,050 $3,270 $44,000 $48,600 $49,050 $51,870 $/EU IN DM $44,000 DM CC $48,600 CC $49,050 / 45,000 = $1.09 EI DM $10,900 = 10,000 × 100% × $1.09 CC = 10,000 × 40% × $1.33 5,320 $51,870 / 39,000 = $1.33 $16,220 $ 2.42 106 The John Company (p.2) FIFO METHOD E.U. DM WIP Units CC 100% 60% BI 5,000 Out IN 40,000 100% 40% DM 35,000 EI 10,000 BI: (DM) 5,000× 0% CC -0- BI: (CC) 5,000×40% 2,000 Start & Finish 30,000 EI: (DM) 10,000×100% 10,000 30,000 EI: (CC) 10,000× 40% 4,000 E.U. 40,000 WIP - $ (FIFO) BI DM $5,050 CC $3,270 CC $48,600 Costs per EU Out DM $ 8,320 from BI 2,700 Finished CC 5,000×40%×$1.35 IN DM $44,000 73,500 S&F 30,000 × $2.45 $84,520 BI Total $1.01 $3,270 CC ÷ (5,000× 60%) $1.09 $2.10 $1.35 $2.45 $ per EU DM $11,000 = 10,000 × 100% × $1.10 $44,000 DM ÷ 40,000 E.U. CC = 10,000 × 40% × $1.35 $48,600 CC ÷ 36,000 E.U. 5,400 CC $ per EU $5,050 DM ÷ (5,000×100%) IN EI 36,000 $1.10 $16,400 $100,920 Costs to Account For (Info we need to do problem) 107 Jolly Candies 1. BE(units) = 2. BE(units) = FC + NI CM per unit $400 + $300 = = 700 units $1 $400 + $0 FC + NI CM per unit = = 400 units $1 Rev (480 units × $4) - VC (480 units × $3) CM - FC NI NIAT 3. NIBT = $1,920 1,440 $ 480 400 $ 80 $300 = = $500 1 – 40% 1- TR BE(units) = 400 units × 120% = 480 units (volume 20% above breakeven volume) FC + NI CM per unit $400 + $500 = = 1,800 units $4.00 - $3.50 108 Jude Law & Associates If the new system is purchased, what will occur?? $180,000 10,000 (76,000) (90,000) 500 Labor cost savings on old system ($36,000 × 5 years) Sale of old system Cost of new system Labor cost of new system ($18,000 × 5 years) Higher residual value of new system $24,500 SAVINGS BY PURCHASING NEW SYSTEM 109 Judge Ely Jeans WIP DM FG $49,600 $29,500 98,400 95,600 118,400 $32,300 $37,600 COGM 95,600 340,400 326,000 340,400 COGS 139,200 $52,000 $62,400 DL COGS $118,400 $118,400 $326,000 $326,000 0 ACOGS 0 MOH I/S $326,000 $ 7,200 $7,200 44,800 60% * 36000 = 40% * $36,000 = 4,800 2,640 10,400 123,200 15,200 S&A 35,200 0 $14,400 4,000 $21,600 $139,200 $715,200 $139,200 15,300 166,740 492,740 $222,460 NI 110 Kaitlyn Korporation CASH Beg. Collections $15,000 $90,000 Borrow $32,000 End $12,000 $125,000 Disbursements 111 Kennedy Company Price AQ * AP 1,600 * AP Quantity AQ * SP AP = $3.45 $5,520 SQ * SP 1,600 * $3.60 $5,760 $240 F AQ * SP * $3.60 SQ * SP 1,450 * $3.60 112 Lands End Men’s Suits Price AQ × AC 10,000 × $5.00 $50,000 Qty/Usage AQ × SC 10,000 × $6.00 $60,000 SQ × SC Standard Allowed for Actual Output (in units) $10,000 F AQ × SC (2700)(4) × $6.00 $64,800 SQ × SC (2700)(3.5) × $6.00 $56,700 $8,100 U CAN’T! Actual Cost < Standard Cost = FAVORABLE Actual Quantity < Standard Quantity = FAVORABLE 113 Mango Motors Absorption Costing Variable Costing Income Statement Income Statement For the Year Ended Dec. 31, 1996 For the year Ended Dec. 31, 1996 Rev. $810,000 Rev. $810,000 COGS (540,000) VC (540,000) (60,000) GM S&A $210,000 (67,500) (67,500) CM FC (50,000) NI $92,500 $202,500 (60,000) (50,000) NI $92,500 114 Marie Manufacturing Company DM BI WIP BI $ 84,000 (a.) $844,000 $ 42,000 $844,000 Purch. $850,000 $820,000 EI $ 48,000 $765,000 FG BI $ 124,000 (d.) $2,420,000 $2,411,000 EI $ 133,000 $2,420,000 COGS EI $93,000 DL $820,000 $820,000 $2,411,000 $ 40,200 $2,370,800 (e.) $2,370,800 0 0 I/S MOH IDM $ 4,000 Supplies $ 6,200 Fact Depr $ 60,000 Security $ 12,000 Supplies $ 82,600 $2,370,800 Applied MOH = Actual Activity × PDOR 51,000 DLH × $15 = $ 4,000 Adm. Depr. $ 3,000 $765,000 (b.) Sales Sal. $120,000 Office Depr. $ 22,200 $2,520,000 Equip Dep $560,000 $724,800 Office Depr. $3,335,000 Sales $765,000 $815,000 (f.) $40,200 OverappliedMOH $40,200 0 PDOR = (c.) Estimated MOH Estimated Activity $750,000 = 50,000 DLH = $15 per DLH 115 McKay Mills 1. PDOR = Est. OH / Est. Activity = $1,335,000 / 1645 (500 + 410 + 735) PDOR = $811.55 per DLH 2. Actuals: Yarn 455 * $811.55 = $369,255.25 Fabric 420 * $811.55 = $340,851.00 Clothing 750 * $811.55 = $608,662.50 $1,318,768.75 MOH Actual Applied $1,372,000.00 $1,318,768.75 $53,231.25 underapplied 116 Mesa Verde Company MESA VERDE COMPANY Balance Sheet December 31, 2005 Assets Current Assets: Cash ………………………… Accounts receivable ………… Inventories ………………….. Total current assets ………… Noncurrent assets ……………. Total assets …………………… $ 10,250 46,000 86,250 Liabilities Current liabilities ..…………… Noncurrent liabilities ………… Total liabilities.……………….. $ 22,500 62,000 $142,500 280,000 $422,500 Where? How? Note 8 [Plug] Note 5 Note 4 Note 7 [Plug] (Given) Note 6 [Calc. = Total L + SE] $ 84,500 Note 9 Note 10 [Plug] Note 3 338,000 $422,500 (Given) (Given) Note 2 Note 2 [Calc.: Note 6] Stockholders’ Equity Common stock ..……………… Additional paid-in capital ……. Retained earnings .…………… Total stockholders’ equity …… Total liabilities and equity …… $150,000 60,000 128,000 117 SUPPORTING COMPUTATIONS Mesa Verde (p. 2) Note 1: Compute net income for 2005 Sales ………………….. Cost of goods sold …… Gross profit ………….. Operating expenses ….. Income before taxes …. Taxes expense ……….. Net income …………… $920,000 690,000 (75% of sales (100% - Gross profit margin ratio)) $230,000 (25% of sales (#) Gross profit margin ratio) 180,000 $ 50,000 20,000 (tax at 40% rate (#)) $ 30,000 Note 2: Compute Stockholders’ Equity Common stock ($15 par × 10,000 sh.) Additional paid-in capital (($21-$15)×10,000 sh.) Retained earnings, Dec. 31, 2004 Net income Retained earnings, Dec. 31, 2005 Total stockholders’ equity Note 3: Total equity Total Debt $150,000 (#) 60,000 (#) $210,000 (#) 98,000 (#) 30,000 128,000 $338,000 $338,0000 ÷ 4 (#) Shareholders’ equity to total debt $ 84,500 (#) — piece(s) of information provided in problem 118 SUPPORTING COMPUTATIONS Mesa Verde (p. 3) Precisely is “Avg.” Inv.., We will use as “End” (because it is all we have) Note 4: Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ (Avg.) Inventory 8 = $690,000 (from Note 1) ÷ Inventory Inventory = $86,250 8 = 360(#) ÷ 45(#) Days sales in inventory An alternative calculation for Inventory turnover “Ending” Note 5: Days sales in receivables = Receivables ÷ (Credit sales ÷ 360(#)) 18 days (#) = Receivables ÷ ($920,000(#)÷360) Receivables = $46,000 Note 6: Total assets = Total liabilies + Total equity = $338,000 (from Note 3) + $84,500 (from Note 3) = $422,500 Note 7: Total assets = Current assets + Noncurrent assets $422,500 = Current assets + $280,000 (#) Current assets = $142, 500 Note 8: Current assets = Cash + Receivables + Inventory Cash (plug) = Total assets – Receivables – Inventory = $142,500 - $46,000 (from Note 4) - $86,250 (from Note 4) = $10,250 (#) or (#) — piece(s) of information provided in problem 119 SUPPORTING COMPUTATIONS Mesa Verde (p. 4) Note 9: Acid-test ratio = (Cash + Accounts receivable) ÷ Current liabilities 2.5 (#) = ($10,250 + $46,000) ÷ Current liabilities Current liabilities = $22,500 Note 10: Total liabilities = Current liabilities + Noncurrent liabilities $84,500 (from Note 3) = $22,500 + Noncurrent liabilities Noncurrent liabilities = $62,000 (#) or (#) — piece(s) of information provided in problem 120 Millstone Company MILLSTONE COMPANY Balance Sheet December 31, 2004 Assets Current Assets: Cash ………………………… Accounts receivable ………… Inventories ………………….. Total current assets ………… Noncurrent assets ……………. Total assets …………………… $ 61,700 115,000 161,000 Liabilities Current liabilities ..…………… Noncurrent liabilities ………… Total liabilities.……………….. $276,000 63,080 $337,700 510,000 $847,700 Where? How? Note 7 Note 4 Note 3 Calculation: Cash+A/R+Inv. (Given) Calc: Note 8 $339,080 Note 6 Note 10 [Plug] Note 9 508,620 $847,700 (Given) (Given) Note 13 [Plug] Note 11 [ = Total assets] Stockholders’ Equity Common stock ..……………… Additional paid-in capital ……. Retained earnings .…………… Total stockholders’ equity …… Total liabilities and equity …… $100,000 150,000 258,620 121 SUPPORTING COMPUTATIONS Millstone (p. 2) Note 1: Compute net income for 2005 Sales ………………….. Cost of goods sold …… Gross profit ………….. Operating expenses ….. Income before taxes …. Taxes expense ……….. Net income …………… $1,840,000 (#) 1,288,000 (70% of sales (100% - Gross profit margin ratio)) $552,000 (30% of sales (#) Gross profit margin ratio) $ 92,000 (5% Net operating profit margin ratio (#)) Note 2: Compute Stockholders’ Equity Common stock ($15 par × 10,000 sh.) Additional paid-in capital (($21-$15)×10,000 sh.) $100,000 (#) 150,000 (#) Retained earnings, Dec. 31, 2004 Net income Retained earnings, Dec. 31, 2005 Total stockholders’ equity $166,620 92,000 Note 3: Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ (Avg.) Inventory 8 (#) = $1,288,000 (from Note 1) ÷ Inventory Inventory = $161,000 (#) — piece(s) of information provided in problem $250,000 (#) The Answer to Question #2 (Note 13) 258,620 [Plug: Note 12] $508,620 (Note 11) Precisely is “Avg.” Inv.., We will use as “End” (because it is all we have) 122 SUPPORTING COMPUTATIONS Millstone (p. 3) Note 4: Accounts receivable turnover = Sales ÷ Average accounts receivable 16 (#) = $1,840,000 ÷ Avg. A/R Accounts receivable = $115,000 Precisely is “Avg.” Inv.., We will use as “End” (because it is all we have) Note 5: Operating cash flow to income = Operating cash flow ÷ Net income 3 (#) = Operating cash flow ÷ $92,000 (Note 1) Operating cash flow = $276,000 Note 6: Cash flow to current liabilities ratio = Operating cash flow ÷ Current liabilities 1 (#) = $276,000 (Note 5) ÷ Current liabilities Current liabilities = $276,000 Note 7: Working capital = Current assets - Current liabilities = Cash + Accounts receivable + Inventories - Current liabilities $27,200 (#) = Cash + $115,000 (Note 4) + $161,000 (Note 3) - $276,000 (Note 6) Cash = $61,700 Note 8: Total assets = Cash + Accounts receivables + Inventories + Noncurrent assets = $61,700 (Note 7) + $115,000 (Note 4) + $161,000 (Note 3) + $510,000 (#) Total assets = $847,700 (#) — piece(s) of information provided in problem 123 SUPPORTING COMPUTATIONS Note 9: Millstone (p. 4) Total debt ratio = Total liabilities ÷ Total assets 0.4 (#) = Total liabilities ÷ $847,700 (Note 8) Total liabilities = $339,080 Note 10: Total liabilities = Current liabilities + Noncurrent liabilities $339,080 (Note 9) = $276,000 (Note 6) + Noncurrent liabilities Noncurrent liabilities = $63,080 Note 11: Total assets = Total liabilities + Total equity $847,700 (Note 8) = $339,080 (Note 9) + Total equity Total equity = $508,620 Note 12: Total equity = Common stock + Add’l paid-in capital + Ending retained earnings $508,620 (Note 11) = $100,000 (#) + $150,000 (#) + Ending R/E Ending retained earnings = $258,620 Note 13: End retained earnings = Begin retained earnings + Net income $258,620 (Note 12) = Begin retained earnings + $92,000 (Note 1) Begin retained earnings = $166,620 (#) — piece(s) of information provided in problem 124 Missouri Retailers (A) APR APR Feb Mar. Apr. $ 85,000×20% $ 95,000×30% $ 75,000×50% MAY Mar. Apr. May $ 95,000×20% $ 75,000×30% $ 85,000×50% JUN Apr. May Jun. $ 75,000×20% $ 85,000×30% $108,000×50% MAY JUN Total $17,000 28,500 37,500 $83,000 $19,000 22,500 42,500 $84,000 $15,000 25,500 54,000 $94,500 $261,500 125 Missouri Retailers (B) APR APR Mar. Apr. $50,000×70% $55,000×30% MAY Apr. May $55,000×70% $65,000×30% JUN May Jun. $65,000×70% $88,000×30% MAY JUN Total $35,000 16,500 $51,500 $38,500 19,500 $58,000 $45,500 26,400 $71,900 $181,400 126 Mizzou Company 1. Traditional Method PDOR = Estimated Activity ÷ Estimated Activity = $130,890 ÷ 1,720 = $76.10 per DLH Unit Product Cost: Direct Materials Direct Labor Mfg. Overhead Total Unit Cost 2. Miz $10.70 11.20 53.27 * $75.17 Zou $16.70 19.20 91.32 ** $127.22 * 0.7 DLH/unit × $76.10 = $53.27 ** 1.2 DLH/unit × $76.10 = $91.32 Activity-Based Costing: Activity Rates Activity Cost Pool Machine set-ups Purchase orders General factory Estimated MOH $13,570 91,520 25,800 Estimated Activity 230 setups 2,080 orders 1,720 DLH Activity Rates $59 per setup $44 per order $15 per DLH 127 Mizzou Company (p. 2) 3. (a) Activity-Based Costing: Applying MOH to Products MIZ Activity Rates Activities Machine set-ups $59 per setup Purchase orders $44 per order $15 per DLH General factory Total Overhead Cost 3. (b) Estimated Activity 100 setups 810 orders 280 DLH MOH $ 5,900 35,640 4,200 $45,740 Estimated Activity 130 setups 1,270 orders 1,440 DLH MOH $ 7,670 55,880 21,600 $85,150 Activity-Based Costing: MOH per Unit Number of units produced 400 units MOH per unit 3. (c) ZOU $114.35 per unit 1,200 units $70.96 per unit Activity-Based Costing: Unit Product Costs Unit Product Cost: Direct Materials Direct Labor Mfg. Overhead Total Unit Cost Miz $ 10.70 11.20 114.35 $136.25 Zou $16.70 19.20 79.96 $106.86 128 Moehrle Manufacturing Costs to manufacture: DM $45 DL $30 VOH $30 FOH $22 Total $127 A special order is received to produce monitors with a special logo that would increase production costs by $5.00 per monitor * *What is the minimum selling price Moehrle should accept for this order? $105 + $5 $110 minimum selling price for special order 129 Muleskinner Athletic Wear, Inc. Inventory Accounts Product Costs DM WIP $60,000 Purch $250,000 BI + In = EI + Out $240,000 $120,000 240,000 405,000 200,000 FG COGM $850,000 $850,000 $835,000 COGS $165,000 $115,000 $70,000 $150,000 COGS DL $405,000 $405,000 $835,000 $835,000 ACOGS -0MOH I/S $10,000 25,000 $835,000 100,000 Period Costs 35,000 30,000 Admin. $940,000 Rev. $110,000 $ 5,000 NI (LOSS!!) $200,000 $200,000 -0- 130 Narcissus Needles 1. Utilities $10,000 Depr. 15,000 Dupr. Sal. 30,000 Janitorial 6,000 Ins. 9,000 Total MOH Est. DLH PDOR $70,000 = 3,500 = Est. OH / Ect. Activity = $70,000 / 3,500 PDOR = $20 2. Apploied OH = PDOR = $20 Applied OH = * * Activity 3,600 DLH $72,000 3. Utilities $10,500 Depr. 15,000 Supr. Sal. 30,000 Janitorial 5,200 Ins. 8,500 Total MOH $69,200 MOH Actual $69,200 Applied $72,000 $2,800 Overapplied 131 Paradise Company RM (RM-lbs.) 40,000 WIP (RM-lbs.) 10,000 FG (RM-lbs.) 80,000 1,010,000 Purch. 1,000,000 50,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 10,000 1,000,000 50,000 132 Pirates, Inc. Rate AQ × AC 28,000 × $11.70 $327,600 Efficiency AQ × SC 28,000 × $12.00 $336,000 $8,400 F Std. Allowed for Actual Output (in units) SQ × SC (22,000)(1.25) × $12.00 $330,000 $6,000 U $2,400 F 133 Plentiful Printing, Inc. WIP DM BI Purch $15,000 BI 95,000 90,000 $3,000 $20,000 90,000 40,000 EI FG $20,000 COGM 180,000 185,000 $180,000 60,000 $15,000 COGS 8000 2000 3000 DL EI $13,000 COGS 2,500 * $16 $40,000 $40,000 $185,000 $2000 / 125 hrs = $16 /hr Direct 3000 Labor $182,000 $182,000 Rate 0 Adj. COGS 0 MOH Actual $57,000 I/S Applied Adj. COGS $182,000 $40,000 * 1.5 Selling 57,000 = $60,000 Admin 12,000 $285,000 Sales $34,000 NI 3000 3000 0 PDOR = Est OH / Est Activity = $600,000 / $400,000 = 1.5 per DL $ 134 Polaris Company DM BI $ 10,000 Purch $210,000 WIP $178,000 BI FG $ 42,000 BI $178,000 $ 12,000 $ 37,000 $520,000 $480,000 COGS $ 90,000 EI $ 34,000 $240,000 EI DL $520,000 EI $ 77,000 $ 30,000 COGS $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $480,000 -0- $472,000 $ 8,000 $472,000 Adj. COGS -0- MOH IDM $ 12,000 IDL $110,000 Depr. $ 40,000 Other $ 70,000 $232,000 I/S 30,000 * $8 COGS $472,000 Selling $ 54,000 Admin. $ 42,000 $600,000 Sales = $240,000 $ 8,000 $ 32,000 $ 8,000 NI -0- 135 Polaris Company (p. 2) [Stmt. of Cash Flows] CASH $600,000 $210,000 $ 90,000 $110,000 $ 70,000 $ 54,000 $ 42,000 $ 24,000 Accum. Depr. $ 40,000 136 Portland Pilots Association Portland Pilots Association Comparative Balance Sheets 31-Dec Assets Cash Accounts receivable Prepaid expenses Land Building Accumulated depreciation - building Equipment Accumulated depreciation -- equipment Total 2004 $67,200 $24,000 $4,800 $156,000 $192,000 ($13,200) $32,400 ($3,600) $459,600 2003 $40,800 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $0 $88,800 Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Accounts payable Bonds payable Common stock Retained earnings Total $70,800 $156,000 $60,000 $172,800 $459,600 $4,800 $0 $60,000 $24,000 $88,800 Change Increase/Decrease $26,400 Increase (12,000) Decrease 4,800 Increase 156,000 Increase 192,000 Increase (13,200) Increase 20,400 Increase (3,600) Increase $66,000 Increase 156,000 Increase 0 148,800 Increase 137 Portland Pilots Assoc. (p. 2) PORTLAND PILOTS COMPANY Statement of Cash Flows -- Indirect Method For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 Operating Activities Net income Adjustments to convert net income to a cash basis: Depreciation expense Loss on sale of equipment Decrease in accounts receivable Increase in prepaid expenses Increase in accounts payable Net cash provided by operating activities Investing Activities Purchase of building Purchase of equipment Sale of equipment Net cash used by investing activies Financing Activities Payment of cash dividends Net cash used by financing activities $166,800 $18,000 3,600 12,000 (4,800) 66,000 94,800 $261,600 ($192,000) (30,000) 4,800 (217,200) (18,000) (18,000) Net increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $26,400 40,800 $67,200 Noncash investing and financing activities Issuance of bonds payable to purchase land $156,000 138 Postmodern Products Standard Allowed for Actual Output feet Price AQ × AC Quantity / Usage AQ × SC SQ × SC (3,000)(5) × $3.00 45,000 × $3.00 $45,000 15,200 × $3.00 $45,600 15,200 × $3.15 $47,880 $2,280 U $600 U $2,880 U DIRECT MATERIALS ANSWERS: 1(a) = $3.15 1(b) = $2,280 U 1(c) = $600 U 139 Postmodern Products (p. 2) Standard Allowed for Actual Output DLH Rate AQ × AC Efficiency AQ × SC 5,400 × $11.50 $62,100 5,400 × $11.40 $61,560 $540 F SQ × SC (3,000)(1.75) × $11.50 5,250 × $11.50 $60,375 $1,725 U $1,185 U DIRECT LABOR ANSWERS: 2(a) = $11.50 2(b) = 5,250 2(c) = 1.75 140 P.W. Products Standard Allowed for Actual Output pounds Price AQ × AC Quantity / Usage AQ × SC SQ × SC 350,000 × $4.00 $1,400,000 350,000 × $4.12 $1,442,000 $42,000 U (12,000)(25) × $4.00 300,000 × $4.00 $1,200,000 304,000 × $4.00 $1,216,000 $16,000 U CAN’T! DIRECT MATERIALS DM Purchased ≠ DM Used 141 P.W. Products (p. 2) Standard Allowed for Actual Output DLH Rate AQ × AC Efficiency AQ × SC 95,400 × $10.00 $954,000 95,400 × $10.55 $1,006,470 $52,470 U SQ × SC (12,000)(8) × $10.00 96,000 × $10.00 $960,000 $6,000 F $46,470 U DIRECT LABOR 142 Rex Company Price Quantity AQ * AP 30,000 * $2.80 AQ * SP 30,000 * $3.00 SQ * SP 29,000 * $3.00 $84,000 $90,000 $87,000 $3,000 u $6,000 F $3,000 / 1,000 in Q = $3.00 $3,000 F 143 Rikki-Tikki-Tavi Taffy Rikky-Tikky-Tavi Taffy Comparative Balance Sheets 31-Dec Assets Current Assets: Cash Accounts receivable Inventory Prepaid expenses Total current assets Long-term investments Plant and equipment Less: Accumulated depreciation Net plant and equipment Total assets Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Current liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Total current liabilities Bonds payable Deferred income taxes Stockholders’ equity: Preferred stock Common stock Retained earnings Total stockholders’ equity Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity 2002 2001 $3,600 144,000 129,600 6,000 283,200 64,800 523,200 72,000 451,200 $799,200 $26,400 98,400 102,000 9,600 236,400 88,800 336,000 60,000 276,000 $601,200 ($22,800) $45,600 $27,600 ($3,600) $46,800 ($24,000) $187,200 $12,000 $175,200 $198,000 Decrease Increase Increase Decrease Increase Decrease Increase Increase Increase Increase $86,400 22,800 109,200 156,000 14,400 $72,000 $14,400 Increase 21,600 $1,200 Increase 93,600 $15,600 Increase 0 $156,000 Increase 12,000 $2,400 Increase 98,400 318,000 103,200 519,600 $799,200 114,000 ($15,600) Decrease 285,600 $32,400 Increase 96,000 $7,200 Increase 495,600 $24,000 Increase $601,200 $198,000 Increase 144 Rikki-Tikki-Tavi Taffy (p. 2) RIKKY-TIKKY-TAVI TAFFY Statement of Cash Flows -- Indirect Method For the Year Ended December 31, 2002 Operating Activities Net income Adjustments to convert net income to a cash basis: Depreciation expense Increase in accounts receivable Increase in inventory Decrease in prepaid expenses Increase in accounts payable Increase in accrued liabilities Gain on sale of investments Gain on sale of equipment Increase in deferred income taxes Net cash provided by operating activities $37,200 $33,600 (45,600) (27,600) 3,600 14,400 1,200 (12,000) (3,600) 2,400 Investing Activities Sale of investments Sale of equipment Purchase of plant and equipment Net cash used by investing activies $36,000 12,000 (217,200) Financing Activities Increase in bonds payable Increase in common stock Payment of cash dividends Net cash used by financing activities $156,000 16,800 (30,000) (33,600) $3,600 (169,200) 142,800 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents at end of year ($22,800) 26,400 $3,600 Noncash investing and financing activities Preferred stock converted to common stock $15,600 145 Robin Hood, Inc. $2,000,000 Estimated MOH a. = PDOR = = Estimated Activity b. $16.00 per MH 125,000 DLH Applied MOH = Actual Activity × PDOR 140,000 DLH × $16.00 = $2,240,000 MOH c. $2,400,000 Underapplied $2,240,000 $160,000 $160,000 to COGS -0- 146 DM Roley Poley WIP BI $49,000 (a.) BI PURCH. $319,700 (d.) $325,000 $753,660 $293,480 EI $160,080 $131,400 325,000 $126,100 FG BI $87,300 $753,660 763,660 EI $77,300 COGS EI $73,900 $763,660 DL $5,660 (f.) $769,320 $293,480 $293,480 $769,320 0 0 I/S MOH $769,320 IDL $22,700 SOLO SALARIES $85,000 DEPR. $31,000 920 x 29= 26,680 DLH ADU. PTY TAX $12,600 PTY TAX $5,400 FIRE INS. $1,960 FIRE INS. 26,680 x $600 $7,840 IDM $11,600 UTIL. DEPR. = $160,080 $44,000 COMM. $28,500 $36,000 ADMIN. $167,200 $44,000 UTIL. $9,000 RENT $8,700 DEPR. $17,400 MISC. $4,300 $165,740 Underapplied $5,660 (c.) MOH $5,660 0 PER UNIT PRIME COSTS (b.) DM $325,000 DL 293,480 $618,480 (e.) $753,660 / 920 = $819 R & ALLOW $1,281,700 Sales $36,100 $1,176,880 $104,820 X 40% = $41,928 (f.) $104,820 NI BT $62,892 NI AT 147 Rondini Magic Company Rondini Magic Company Comparative Balance Sheets December 31 Assets Cash Accounts receivable Inventories Prepaid expenses Land Building Accumulated depreciation – building Equipment Accumulated depreciation – equipment Total 2004 $ 64,800 81,600 64,800 4,800 54,000 240,000 (25,200) 231,600 (33,600) $ 682,800 2003 $ 44,400 31,200 -07,200 84,000 240,000 (13,200) 81,600 (12,000) $ 463,200 Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Bonds payable Common stock ($1 par) Retained earnings Total $ 27,600 12,000 132,000 264,000 247,200 $ 682,800 $ 48,000 -0180,000 72,000 163,200 $ 463,200 Change Increase/Decrease $ 20,400 Increase 50,400 Increase 64,800 Increase 2,400 Decrease 30,000 Decrease -012,000 Increase 150,000 Increase 21,600 Increase $ 20,400 Decrease 12,000 Increase 48,000 Decrease 192,000 Increase 84,000 Increase 148 Rondini Magic Co. (p. 2) RONDINI MAGIC COMPANY Statement of Cash Flows -- Indirect Method For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 Operating Activities Net income Adjustments to convert net income to a cash basis: Depreciation expense Increase in accounts receivable Increase in inventories Decrease in prepaid expenses Decrease in accounts payable Increase in accrued liabilities Loss on sale of equipment Net cash provided by operating activities $150,000 $39,600 (50,400) (64,800) 2,400 (20,400) 12,000 2,400 Investing Activities Sale of land Sale of equipment Purchase of equipment Net cash used by investing activies $30,000 40,800 (199,200) Financing Activities Redemption of bonds Sale of common stock Payment of cash dividends Net cash used by financing activities (12,000) 156,000 (66,000) Net increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents at end of year (79,200) $70,800 (128,400) 78,000 $20,400 44,400 $64,800 149 S & P Corporation 1. 2. BE(units) = BE($) = FC + NI CM per unit FC + NI CM Ratio $300,000 + $0 = = 60,000 units $10 - $5 $300,000 +$0 = = $600,000 50% 150 Sam Enterprises Cans Can-ettes Units produced per hour 3 1 Contribution margin per unit $ 3 $ 6 Contribution margin per hour (the resource constraint) $ 9 $ 6 Total contribution for 1,000 hours $9,000 $6,000 THE WINNER! 151 Sleepwell, Inc. DM $18,500 80,000 81,700 $16,800 FG WIP $12,000 $10,200 81,700 261,450 40,500 105,750 217,550 $216,450 $9,100 $23,500 COGS DL $40,500 $40,500 $217,550 217,550 0 0 I/S MOH $105,750 0 $105,750 $217,550 100,000 $400,000 $ 82,450 152 Sly-Like-A-Fox, Inc. SLY-LIKE-A-FOX, INC. Balance Sheet December 31, 2002 Assets Current Assets: Cash ………………………… Accounts receivable ………… Inventories ………………….. Current Assets ………………... Noncurrent assets ……………. Total assets …………………… $ 75,000 75,000 50,000 $200,000 $300,000 $500,000 Where? How? Note 10 [Plug] Note 4 Note 5 Note 7 [Plug] (Given) Note 6 [Calc. = Total L+E] Liabilities and Equity Current liabilities ..…………… Noncurrent liabilities ………… Total liabilities.……………….. $100,000 150,000 $250,000 Note 8 Note 9 [Plug] Note 3 Total equity ………………….. Total Liabilities and Equity ….. $250,000 $500,000 Note 2 [Calc.: Note 6] 153 SUPPORTING COMPUTATIONS Sly-Like-A-Fox (p. 2) Note 1: Compute net income for 2005 Sales ………………….. Cost of goods sold …… Gross profit ………….. Operating expenses ….. Net income …………… $1,000,000 500,000 (50% of sales (100% - Gross profit margin ratio)) $ 500,000 (50% of sales (#) Gross profit margin ratio) 450,000 $ 50,000 (With no information given about taxes, this is all we have.) Note 2: Return on end-of-year equity = Net income ÷ End of year equity 20% (#) = $50,000 (from Note 1) ÷ End of year equity Equity = $250,000 Note 3: Total debt to equity ratio = Total liabilities ÷ Stockholders’ equity 1 (#) = Total liabilities ÷ $250,000 (from Note 2) Total liabilities = $250,000 Note 4: Accounts receivable turnover = Sales ÷ Average accounts receivable 16 (#) = $1,000,000 (#) ($50,000(#) + End A/R) ÷ 2 Ending accounts receivable = $75,000 (#) or (#) — piece(s) of information provided in problem 154 SUPPORTING COMPUTATIONS Sly-Like-A-Fox (p. 3) Note 5: Days’ sales in inventory = (Inventory × 360) ÷ Cost of goods sold 36 (#) = (Inventory × 360) ÷ $500,000 (from Note 1) End Inventory = $50,000 Note 6: Total assets = Total liabilities + Total equity = $250,000 (from Note 3) + $250,000 (from Note 2) = $500,000 Note 7: Total assets = Current assets + Noncurrent assets $500,000 = Current assets + $300,000 (#) Current assets = $200,000 Note 8: Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities 2 (#) = $200,000 ÷ Current liabilities Current liabilities = $100,000 Note 9: Total liabilities = Current liabilities + Noncurrent liabilities $250,000 (from Note 3) = $100,000 + Noncurrent liabilities Noncurrent liabilities = $150,000 (This “formula” provided by problem information) Note 10: Current assets = Cash + Accounts receivable + Inventory $200,000 = Cash (plug) + $75,000 (from Note 4) + $50,000 (from Note 5) Cash = $75,000 155 (#) or (#) — piece(s) of information provided in problem Smith Company Price AQ × AC 36,000 × $8.35 $300,600 Qty AQ × SC 36,000 × $8.25 $297,000 $3,600 U SQ × SC Std. Allowed for Actual Output (Std. Amt. x Actual Units) AQ × SC 31,800 × $8.25 $262,350 SQ × SC (3200)(10) × $8.25 $264,000 $1,650 F CAN’T! 156 Smith Company (p. 2) Rate AQ × AC 11,520 × $9.80 $112,896 Efficiency AQ × SC 11,520 × $9.65 $111,168 $1,728 U SQ × SC (3200)(3.5) × $9.65 $108,080 $3,088 U $4,816 U TranslaTing Dr. Fessler’s “picTure” inTo Formulas: 1. AQ × (SC – AC) = Rate Variance 2. SC × (SQ – AQ) = Efficiency variance 157 SoMuch Stereos Absorption Costing Variable Costing Income Statement Income Statement For the Year Ended Feb. 28, 2000 For the Year Ended Feb. 28, 2000 Rev. Rev. $89,000 VC: DM (22,000) DL (14,000) $89,000 COGS: DM (22,000) DC (14,000) VOH (9,000) VOH (9,000) FOH (10,000) VSE (5,000) GM $34,000 CM $39,000 S&A: VSE (5,000) FC: FOH (10,000) FSE (16,000) FSE (16,000) FAE (14,000) FAE (14,000) NI ($1,000) NI ($1,000) 158 South Street Furniture Company South Street Furniture Company Variable Costing I/S For the Y/E Dec. 31, 2005 South Street Furniture Company Absorption Costing I/S For the Y/E Dec. 31, 2005 Rev $3,600,000 = 72,000 units × $20 - CoGS (248,000) (2,176,000) (12,000) $1,164,000 = BI 8,000 units × $31 per unit = 64,000 units × $34 per unit Underapplied MOH (2,000 @ $6) GM - S&A (216,000) (340,000) NI $ 608,000 Rev - VC CM = 72,000 units sold × $3 per unit Fixed - FC NI $ 3,600,000 = 72,000 units × $20 (208,000) = BI 8,000 units × $26 per unit (1,792,000) = 64,000 units × $28 per unit (216,000) = 72,000 units × $ 3 per unit $ 1,384,000 (480,000) MOH (340,000) S&A $ 564,000 The difference in NI : PDOR = $480,000 ÷ 80,000 normal production = $6.00 per unit FOH from BI FOH to EI Difference in NI $(40,000) 84,000 $ 44,000 = 8,000 units @ $5 per unit = 14,000 units @ $6 per unit 159 Southern Carpets 1. y = a + bx b = hi-lo $ hi-lo activity b = $390,700 - $180,000 4,980 – 2,180 = $210,700 2,800 b = $75.25 per machine hour $390,000 = a + $75.25 (4,980) $390,700 = a + $374,745 a = $15,955 Cost Formula y = $15,955 + $75.25x 2. y = $15,955 + $75.25 (3,500) y = $15,955 + $263,375 y = $279,330 160 Southern Carpets (cont.) SOUTHERN CARPETS Regression Analysis SUMMARY OUTPUT J F M A M J J A S O N D Y = Costs X = Hours $341,062 3,467 $346,471 4,426 $287,328 3,103 $262,828 3,625 $220,843 3,081 $390,700 4,980 $337,924 3,948 $180,000 2,180 $376,246 4,121 $295,041 4,762 $215,121 3,402 $275,343 2,469 Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.740754563 R Square 0.548717323 Adjusted R Square 0.503589056 Standard Error 46999.24973 Observations 12 ANOVA df Regression Residual Total Intercept X = Hours Cost Function: 1 10 11 SS MS 26858506459 26858506459 22089294751 2208929475 48947801211 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat 86152.88975 61152.29174 1.408825202 57.27371965 16.42500026 3.486984399 F Significance F 12.1590602 0.005852441 P-value 0.18921362 0.005852441 Lower 95% Upper 95% -50102.93094 222408.7104 20.6765321 93.87090721 y = $57.27 x + $86,152.89 when x = 3,500 when x = 4,000 y = $286,597.85 y = $315,232.89 161 Steinmueller Steins, Inc. WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD Step 1 DM 100% Step 5 CC 70% 100% WIP-Molding (units) 5,000 20,000 2,000 80% 23,000 DM CC Step 2 EU DM 23,000 2,000 2000*100% 2000*80% E.U. 25,000 WIP-Molding ($) $6,000 $7,000 23,000*$1.98 $13,000 $45,540 $18,000 $18,000 $36,000 CC out EI DM CC 23,000 DM CC $1,920 $1,632 $3,552 2000*100%*$.96 2000*80%*$1.02 1,600 24,600 Step 3 BI + IN = EI + Out Total Costs To Account For: BI IN $6,000 $18,000 $24,000 $7,000 $18,000 $25,000 Step 4 Compute E.U. Costs $24,000/25,000 =$.96 $25,000/24,600 =$1.01626 = $1.02 162 $1.98 Steinmueller Steins (p. 2) FIFO METHOD E.U. DM WIP Units CC 100% 70% BI 5,000 DM Out IN 20,000 23,000 BI: (DM) 5,000× 0% -0- BI: (CC) 5,000×30% 1,500 Start & Finish 100% 80% EI 2,000 CC 18,000 EI: (DM) 2,000×100% 18,000 2,000 EI: (CC) 2,000× 80% 1,600 E.U. 20,000 WIP - $ (FIFO) BI DM $6,000 CC $7,000 CC $18,000 Costs to Account For Out DM $ 13,000.00 from BI 1,279.50 Finished CC 5,000×30%×$0.853 IN DM $18,000 31,554.00 S&F 18,000 × $1.753 $45,833.50 BI Total $1.20 $7,000 CC ÷ (5,000× 70%) $2.00 $3.20 $0.853 $1.753 $ per EU DM $1,800.00 = 2,000 × 100% × $0.90 $18,000 DM ÷ 20,000 E.U. CC = 2,000 × 80% × $0.853 $18,000 CC ÷ 21,100 E.U. 1,364.80 CC $ per EU $6,000 DM ÷ (5,000×100%) IN EI 21,100 $0.90 $3,164.80 $49,000 Costs to Account For (Info we need to do problem) 163 Stetson Company Stetson Company Absorption Costing I/S For the Y/E Dec. 31, 2001 Rev $17,000 = 2,000 units × $8.50 - CoGS (- 0 -) (6,000) (4,000) $ 7,000 = BI ( - none - ) = 2,000 units × $3 per unit Underapplied MOH (4,000 @ $1) - S&A (1,000) (1,400) = 1,000 units sold × $0.50 per unit Fixed NI $ 4,600 GM Stetson Company Absorption Costing I/S For the Y/E Dec. 31, 2002 Rev $25,500 = 3,000 units × $8.50 - CoGS (9,000) (-0-) (9,100) $ 7,400 = BI 3,000 units × $3 per unit = - 0 - units × $3 per unit Underapplied MOH (9,100 @ $1) (1,500) (1,400) = 3,000 units sold × $0.50 per unit Fixed GM Normal volume is 10,000 units of production. Underapplied MOH = 10,000 – 6,000 actual production = 4,000 units - S&A NI $ 4,500 Normal volume is 10,000 units of production. Underapplied MOH = 10,000 – 900 actual production = 9,100 units 164 Stetson Company (p. 2) Stetson Company Variable Costing I/S For the Y/E Dec. 31, 2001 Rev - VC CM - FC NI $ 17,000 Stetson Company Variable Costing I/S For the Y/E Dec. 31, 2002 = 2,000 units × $8.50 (4,000) CoGS (2,000 units × $2.00 per unit) (1,000) S&A (2,000 units × $0.50 per unit) $ 12,000 (10,000) MOH (1,400) S&A $ CM NI The difference in NI 2001: Production > Sales Abs. NI is higher! - VC - FC 600 Units mfg. - units sold × FOH per unit Difference in NI Rev 4,000 $1.00 $ 4,000 $ 25,500 = 3,000 units × $8.50 (6,000) CoGS (3,000 units × $2 per unit (1,500) S&A (3,000 units × $0.50 per unit) $ 18,000 (10,000) MOH (1,400) S&A $ 6,600 The difference in NI 2002: Units mfg. - units sold × FOH per unit Difference in NI Sales > Production VC NI is higher! 2,100 $1.00 $2,100 165 Stiegl Corporation Spend Eff N/A AQ * AP 15,000 * AQ * SP 15,000 * $2.00 SQ * SP 12,000 * $2.00 $27,500 $30,000 $24,000 $2,500 F SQ * SP $6,000 u $3,500 u 166 Stone Monument Co. (A) 1. BE (units) = FC + NI = CMU BE ($) = FC + NI CMR 2. $6,000,000 6,000 units = $1,000 = $6,000,000 = $12,000,000 $2,000 - $1,000 $2,000 6,000 units BE = 20,000 units Normal capacity 30% 167 Stone Monument Co. (B) 1. BE (units) = FC + NI = CMU 2. BE ($) = FC + NI CMR $6,000,000 + $1,400,000 = 7,400 units $1,000 = $6,000,000 + $1,400,000 = $14,800,000 $2,000 - $1,000 $2,000 168 Stone Monument Co. (C) 1. SP (x) = VCU (x) + FC + NI $2,000 (x) = $1,000 (x) + $6,000,000 + (.25) ($2,000) (x) $2,000 x = $1,000 x + $6,000,000 + $500 x $500 x = $6,000,000 x 2. = 12,000 units TR = VC + FC + NI R = .5 R + $6,000,000 + .25R .25 R = $6,000,000 R = $24,000,000 169 Stone Monument Co. (D) 1. SP (x) = VCU (x) + FC + NI $2,000 (x) = $1,000 (x) + $6,000,000 + (.25) ($2,000) (x) $2,000 x = $1,000 x + $6,000,000 + $400 x $600 x = $6,000,000 x 2. x = 10,000 units 10,000 units $2,000 SP $20,000,000 170 Stone Monument Co. (E) SP (x) = VCU (x) + FC + NI SP (20,000) = $1,000 (20,000) + $6,000,000 + $21,000,000 SP = $47,000,000 20,000 SP = $2,350 171 Stone Monument Co. (F) 1. MS ($) = Actual Revenue - BE Revenue MS ($) = MS ($) = 2. $40,000,000 ($2,000 SP x 20,000 normal volume) $12,000,000 (from (A)) $28,000,000 MS Ratio = Actual Revenue - BE Revenue Actual Revenue MS Ratio = $40,000,000 - $12,000,000 $40,000,000 MS Ratio = 70% Quite Good!! 172 Stone Monument Co. (G) First, … NIAT $1,400,000 1- Tax Rate 1. BE (units) = FC + NI 1 - 0.30 = CMU 2. BE ($) = FC + NI CMR $2,000,000 = = NIBT = $6,000,000 + $2,000,000 = 8,000 units $1,000 = $6,000,000 + $2,000,000 = $16,000,000 $2,000 - $1,000 $2,000 173 Strange Fire, P.C. Variable Overhead Spending Actual VOH $54,000 $4,000 F Efficiency AQ × SC 2900 × $20 $58,000 N/A SQ × SC 2800 × $20 $56,000 $2,000 U 2,000 F Flexible Budget Variance = $2,000 F 174 Stuffing Company (A) Present 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $(60,000) Purchase Savings Total $(60,000) $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 PV Factor × 1.0000 × 0.9091 × 0.8264 × 0.7513 NPV Calc. $(60,000) $22,727.50 + $20,660.00 + $18,782.50 = $2,170 ≥ $0 ☺ use Annuity Table OR Purchase Savings PV Factor NPV Calc. + From PV Table $(60,000) × 1.0000 $(60,000) $25,000 per year for 3 years × 2.4869 $62,172.50 = $2,172.50 ☺ 175 Stuffing Company (B) •TRIAL & ERROR •THE HIGHER THE INTEREST RATE, THE LOWER THE PV We know 10% is TOO LOW (why, because it yields a positive NPV) So we try 11% … So we try 12% … So we try 13% … $25,000 × 2.4437 (11% for 3 yr. annuity) $61,092.50 vs. $(60,000) STILL TOO LOW $25,000 × 2.4018 (12% for 3 yr. annuity) $60,200 vs. $(60,000) Still A BIT too low $25,000 × 2.3612 (13% for 3 yr. annuity) $59,025 vs. $(60,000) Now A BIT too HIGH Closer to 12% than 13% 176 Stuffing Company (C) Payback Period = Original Investment ÷ Periodic Cash Flow Investment A: 2 years Investment B: 2 years $ 20,000 in Year 1 80,000 in Year 2 $100,000 Total $ 90,000 in Year 1 10,000 in Year 2 $100,000 Total Investment B BETTER because get money sooner Investment C: 3 years $100,000 ÷ $39,000 = 2.5641 years 177 Stuffing Company (D) Accounting Rate of Return (ARR) = Avg. NI ÷ Investment [ARR aka Simple Rate of Return] Avg. NI ARR = = Average NI Investment $80,000 5 yrs. = = $16,000 $100,000 $16,000 NI per year = 16% ARR 178 Stuffing Company (E) 1. 2. Profitability Index = PV of CF Investment Project 1: $567,270 ÷ $480,000 = 1.182 Project 2: $336,140 ÷ $270,000 = 1.245 Project 3: $379,760 ÷ $400,000 = 0.949 Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 NPV 1 2 3 PI 2 1 3 IRR 2 1 3 RANKING: 179 Sven’s Sweets Company DM BI Purch (for Cash) EI WIP $ 16,700 BI 185,000 $152,500 FG $ 18,400 BI 146,400 $ 24,600 370,000 $375,100 COGS 175,600 $22,800 54,800 EI DL $370,000 EI $ 19,500 $ 25,200 COGS $175,600 $175,600 $375,100 $375,100 -0- -0- MOH IDL $ 14,300 Fact. Repairs 12,600 Fact. Utilities 10,100 I/S Depr., Fact. 9,440 COGS Fact. Ins. 8360 Selling Exp. 114,900 Admin. Exp. 92,600 (Cash) Interest Exp. 5,150 $ 54,800 $ 54,800 -0- Inc. Tax (to R/E) $375,100 $680,000 Sales $ 92,250 NI BT $ 72,250 NI AT $ 20,000 $ 72,250 180 -0- Sven’s Sweets (p. 2) Assets (aka: “Pete”) CASH Beg $ 42,500 $ 14,300 Cash from Customers ((A/R)) 671,900 IDL 12,600 Repairs 10,100 Util. 8,360 Ins. 212,500 A/P 19,000 Plant Assets Beg $ 71,900 (Sales on Acct.) 680,000 Accum. Depr. Beg $724,000 Beg $ 278,400 9,440 (Depr. Exp.) $671,900 (to Cash) End $ 80,000 End $724,000 End $ 287,400 Tax Pay. 152,500 DM 175,600 DL 5,150 A/R (net) Int. Exp. End $ 104,290 Liabilities & Owners’ Equity (aka: “Re-Pete”) Notes Payable Beg Inc. Taxes Payable $ 100,000 Beg (to Cash) $ 5,000 A/P Beg 20,000 (Inc. Tax Exp.) $ 19,000 $ 40,000 $ 212,500 114,900 (Selling Exp.) 92,600 (Adm. Exp..) End $ 100,000 End Common Stock Beg $ 269,600 $ 6,000 End $ 35,000 R/E Beg $ 205,100 72,250 (Net Income) End $ 269,600 End $ 277,350 181 Sven’s Sweets (p. 3) Sven’s Sweets Company Sven’s Sweets Company Balance Sheet As of December 31, 2005 Statement of Cash Flows (Indirect Method) For the Year-Ended December 31, 2005 Assets Cash $ 104,290 A/R 80,000 Plant Assets 724,000 Accum Depr (287,840) DM 22,800 WIP 25,200 FG 19,500 Total Liabilities & Owners’ Equity $687,950 N/P IT/P A/P C/S R/E $ 100,000 6,000 35,000 269,600 277,350 Total $687,950 Net Income $ 72,250 Depr. Exp A/R IT/P A/P DM WIP FG + 9,440 - 8,100 + 1,000 - 5,000 - 6,100 - 6,800 + 5,100 Net Cash Inflows $ 61,790 Beg. Cash 42,500 End Cash $104,290 Not specifically requested by problem; already calculated CF using Direct Method. 182 Sweet Surrender, Inc. SWEET SURRENDER, INC. Balance Sheet December 31, 2003 Assets Current Assets: Cash ………………………… Accounts receivable ………… Inventories ………………….. Current Assets ………………... Noncurrent assets ……………. Total assets …………………… $ 85,000 125,000 75,000 $285,000 $495,000 $780,000 Where? How? (Given) Note 5 Note 4 [Calc.: Note 7] Note 8 [Plug] Note 6 [Calc. = Total L+E] Liabilities and Equity Current liabilities ..…………… Noncurrent liabilities ………… Total liabilities.……………….. $237,500 22,500 $260,000 Note 9 Note 10 [Plug] Note 3 Total equity ………………….. Total Liabilities and Equity ….. $520,000 $780,000 Note 2 [Calc.: Note 6] 183 SUPPORTING COMPUTATIONS Sweet Surrender (p. 2) Note 1: Compute net income for 2003 Sales ………………….. Cost of goods sold …… Gross profit ………….. Operating expenses ….. Income before taxes …. Taxes expense ……….. Net income …………… $3,000,000 1,800,000 $1,200,000 800,000 $ 400,000 140,000 $ 260,000 (= COGS + Gross profit) (#) (60% of sales (100% - Gross profit margin ratio)) (40% of sales (#) Gross profit margin ratio) (#) (Calculation) (tax at 35% rate (#)) Note 2: Return on end-of-year equity = Net income ÷ End of year equity 0.5 (#) = $260,000 (from Note 1) ÷ End of year equity Equity = $520,000 Note 3: Total debt to equity ratio = Total liabilities ÷ Stockholders’ equity 0.5 (#) = Total liabilities ÷ $520,000 (from Note 2) Total liabilities = $260,000 Note 4: Days’ sales in inventory = (Inventory × 360) ÷ Cost of goods sold 15 days (#) = (Inventory × 360) ÷ $1,800,000 (from Note 1) End Inventory = $75,000 Note 5: Days’ sales in receivables = (Accounts receivable × 360) ÷ Sales 15 days (#) = (Inventory × 360) ÷ $3,000,000 (from Note 1) End Accounts receivable = $125,000 (#) — piece(s) of information provided in problem 184 SUPPORTING COMPUTATIONS Sweet Surrender (p. 3) Note 6: Total assets = Total liabilities + Total equity = $260,000 (Note 3) + $520,000 (Note 2) = $780,000 Note 7: Current assets = Cash + Accounts receivable + Inventories Current assets = $85,000 (#) + $125,000 (Note 5) + $75,000 (Note 4) Current assets = $285,000 Note 8: Total assets = Current assets + Noncurrent assets $780,000 (Note 6) = $285,000 (Note 7) + Noncurrent assets (plug) Noncurrent assets = $495,000 Note 9: Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities 1.2 (#) = $285,000 (Note 7) ÷ Current liabilities Current liabilities = $237,500 Note 10: Total liabilities = Current liabilities + Noncurrent liabilities $260,000 (Note 3) = $237,500 (Note 9) + Noncurrent liabilities Noncurrent liabilities = $22,500 185 (#) or (#) — piece(s) of information provided in problem The Swizzle Manufacturing Co. DM BI Purch WIP 10,000 BI 185,000 $200,000 FG $15,000 BI 185,000 $30,000 793,200 $780,000 COGS 230,000 EI $25,000 385,200 EI DL 793,200 EI $43,200 $22,000 COGS (21,400 hrs) $230,000 $230,000 $780,000 200 $779,800 0 Adj. COGS $779,800 MOH Utilities 63,000 IDL 90,000 Maint. 54,000 Depr. 76,000 Rental 102,000 385,000 I/S COGS Est.OH 21,400 * $18 PDOR = Est Activity = $385,200 $ 200 $360,000 = 20,000 DLH $ 200 Utilities 779,800 1,200,000 Sales 7,000 S&A Salaries 110,000 Advertising 136,000 Depr. 19,000 Rental 18,000 = $18 per DLH 0 $130,200 NI 186 Swizzle (p. 2) The Swizzle Manufacturing Company Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured For the Year Ended December 31,1994 Direct material: Raw materials inventory, 1-1-94 $10,000 Add: Purchases of raw materials 200,000 Total materials available Deduct: Raw materials inventory, 12-31-94 $210,000 (25,000) Raw materials used in production $185,000 Direct Labor 230,000 Manufacturing overhead: Utilities...................................................................................... $63,000 Indirect Labor.............................................................................. 90,000 Maintenance................................................................................. 54,000 Depreciation................................................................................. 76,000 Building rent.............................................................................. 102,000 Actual overhead costs $385,000 Add: Overapplied overhead Manufacturing overhead applied to WIP Total manufacturing costs Add: Beginning work in process inventory 200 385,200 $800,200 15,000 $815,200 Deduct: Ending work in process inventory Cost of Goods Manufactured (22,000) $793,200 187 Swizzle (p. 3) The Swizzle Manufacturing Company Schedule of Cost of Goods Sold For the year ended December 31, 1994 Finished goods inventory, 1-1-94 Add: Cost of goods manufactured Goods available for sale Less: Ending finished goods inventory Cost of goods sold Deduct: Overapplied overhead Adjusted cost of goods sold $30,000 793,200 823,200 (43,200) $780,000 (200) $779,800 188 Swizzle (p. 4) The Swizzle Manufacturing Company Income Statement For the Year Ended December 31, 1994 Sales $1,200,000 Less: Cost of Goods Sold (779,800) Gross Margin $420,200 Less: Selling and administrative expenses: Utilities Net Income $ 7,000 Salaries 110,000 Advertising 136,000 Depreciation 19,000 Building rental 18,000 $290,000 $130,200 189 Tallyho Company $3,000,000 budgeted FOH ÷ 100,000 budgeted units = $30 per unit (SC) FIXED OVERHEAD Spending Volume Actual FOH Budgeted FOH BQ × SC $3,200,000 $3,000,000 $200,000 U Applied FOH SQ × SC 110,000 × $30 $3,300,000 $300,000 F $100,000 F 190 Thorp Company Rate Eff AQ * AP 2,000 * $5.00 AQ * SP 2,000 * $5.50 SQ * SP 1,727 *$5.50 $10,000 $11,000 $9,500 $1,000 F $1,500 u 191 Tigér Boats Bill Bird should accept the offer. $12,500 Selling price per boat (11,500) Variable cost per boat ($5,000 + $5,500 + $1,000) $ 1,000 Contribution per boat Fixed manufacturing overhead will not change and thus is not relevant. 192 Tillamook Cheese Co. …can sell just milk, or can process the milk further into cheese, ice cream and yogurt Product: Cheese Ice Cream Butter Sales value at split off (i.e., milk) $400,000 $500,000 $100,000 Sales value if processed further $450,000 $679,000 $110,000 Cost of further processing $ 17,000 $103,000 $ 14,000 Joint costs $150,000 Joint costs are allocated by the sales value at split off Raw Milk - Joint Costs $150,000 Relevant! $400,000 Cost $17,000 $450,000 Cheese :o) $500,000 $103,000 $679,000 Ice Cream :o) $100,000 $14,000 $110,000 Butter :o( Cost to produce butter from milk higher than the increased revenue $1,000,000 revenue from selling product just as milk 193 Tina’s Best Chocolate (A) Tina should process the cocoa powder further into an instant cocoa mix. $2,000 Selling price of Instant Cocoa (500) Selling price of Cocoa powder $1,500 Additional revenue from processing further (800) Additional cost of processing further $700 Additional profit per ¼ ton from processing further 194 Tina’s Best Chocolate (B) Contribution margin per case Machine hours required per case Cost per machine hour THE LIGHT THE DARK $1.00 $2.00 .02 MH $50.00 .05 MH $40.00 Tina’s best product is The Light 195 Toledo Torpedo Company Cost Comparison – Replacement of Machine, Including Relevant and Irrelevant Items FOUR YEARS TOGETHER Keep Replace Difference Sales Expenses: Variable Old machine (book value) Depreciation write-off -or- Lump-sum write-off Disposal value New machine (purchase price) Total expenses Operating income $400,000 $400,000 $ --- 320,000 224,000 96,000 40,000 ------$360,000 $40,000 --40,000* 4,000* 60,000 $320,000 $80,000 ----4,000 (60,000) $40,000 $40,000 * In a formal income statement, these two items would be combined as a "loss on disposal" of $36,000. RELEVANT Benefit (purchase new machine) 196 True Blue Corporation Variable Overhead Spending Actual VOH $1,600 $60 U Efficiency AQ × SC 400 × $3.85 $1,540 N/A SQ × SC 420 × $3.85 $1,617 $77 F $17 F Flexible Budget Variance = $17 F 197 Tub Company Rate Eff AQ * AP 2,200 * $8.40 AQ * SP 2,200 * $8.00 SQ * SP 2,000 * $8.00 $18,480 $17,600 $16,000 $880 u $1,600 u 198 Ward Company PART 2 PART 1 June April: May: June: ? ? $30,000 * 30% July May: June: July: ? $30,000 * 50% $50,000 * 30% August June: July: Aug: $30,000 * 15% $50,000 * 50% $70,000 * 30% June September July: $50,000 * 15% Aug: $70,000 * 50% Sept: $60,000 * 30% July August September July: Aug: Sept: Sept: $50,000 × 80% × 15% = $70,000 × 80% × 50% = $60,000 × 80% × 30% = $60,000 × 20% = $ 6,000 $28,000 $14,400 $12,000 $60,400 20% of sales collected as cash in month of sale 80% of sales are on account and collected later $7,500 $35,000 $18,000 $60,500 199 Whiskers Products, Inc. 2ND Quarter Cash Receipts April Feb: Mar: Apr: $55,000 $60,000 $50,000 * 20% * 30% * 50% May Mar: Apr: May: $60,000 $50,000 $60,000 * 20% * 30% * 50% $50,000 $60,000 $55,000 * 20% * 30% * 50% June Apr: May: June: Total: April $11,000 $18,000 $25,000 May June Total Quarter $54,000 $12,000 $15,000 $30,000 $57,000 $10,000 $18,000 $55,500 $27,500 $54,000 $57,000 $55,500 $166,500 200 Womack Company FG-Units 650 PRODUCTION: 10%*5000= 4,450 4,600 500 201 Young Products Young Products Sales budget For the First Quarter Units Unit price Sales 100,000 x $15.00 $1,500,000 Young Products Production Budget For the First Quarter Sales (in units) 100,000 Desired end. inv. 12,000 202 Young Products (cont.) Young Products Direct Materials For the First Quarter Units to be produced DM per unit (lbs) x Production needs (lbs) Desired end. inv. Total needs (lbs) Less: Beg. inv. (lbs) Materials to be purch. (lbs) Young Products 104,000 4 416,000 6,000 422,000 (4,000) 418,000 Direct Labor Budget For the First Quarter Units to be produced 104,000 Labor: Time per unit x 0.5 Total hours needed 52,000 203