Diamond Pixel Modules for the High Luminosity ATLAS Inner Detector Upgrade Marko Mikuž University of Ljubljana & J. Stefan Institute ATLAS Tracker Upgrade Workshop Valencia 12-14 December 2007 Diamond as sensor material Property Diamond Silicon Band gap [eV] 5.5 1.12 Breakdown field [V/cm] 107 3x105 Intrinsic resistivity @ R.T. [Ω cm] > 1011 2.3x105 Intrinsic carrier density [cm-3] < 103 1.5x1010 Electron mobility [cm2/Vs] 1900 1350 Hole mobility [cm2/Vs] 2300 480 0.9(e)-1.4(h)x 107 0.82x 107 3.52 2.33 6 14 Dielectric constant - ε 5.7 11.9 Displacement energy [eV/atom] 43 13-20 Radiation hard Thermal conductivity [W/m.K] 2000 150 Heat spreader Energy to create e-h pair [eV] 13 3.61 Radiation length [cm] 12.2 9.36 Spec. Ionization Loss [MeV/cm] 4.69 3.21 Aver. Signal Created / 100 μm [e0] 3602 8892 Aver. Signal Created / 0.1 X0 [e0] 4401 8323 Saturation velocity [cm/s] Density [g/cm3] Atomic number - Z Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Low leakage Low capacitance Low signal Marko Mikuž 2 Diamond sensor types - pCVD • Polycrystalline Chemical Vapour Deposition (pCVD) – – – – Grown in μ-wave reactors on non-diamond substrate Exist in Φ = 12 cm wafers, >2 mm thick Small grains merging with growth Grind off substrate side to improve quality → ~500 μm detectors – Base-line diamond material for pixel sensor All photographs courtesy of Element Six Surface view of growth side Side view Test dots on 1 cm grid Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Marko Mikuž 3 Diamond sensor types - scCVD • Single Crystal Chemical Vapour Deposition (scCVD) – – – – Grown on diamond substrate RD-42 has research contract with E6 to develop this material Exist in ~ 1 cm2 pieces, max 1.4 cm x 1.4 cm, thickness > 1 mm A true single crystal Not in time for B-layer replacement Fall-forward for B-layer upgrade (single chips, wafers ?) After heavy irradiations expect similar properties to pCVD Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Marko Mikuž 4 Signal from pCVD diamonds • No processing: put electrodes on, apply electric field • Trapping on grain boundaries and in bulk – much like in heavily irradiated silicon • Parameterized with Charge Collection Distance, defined by Qcol CCD mean not most probable e 36 0 μm • CCD = average distance e-h pairs move apart • Coincides with mean free path in infinite (t ≫ CCD) detector d t d d e d h distance e - h move apart Qcol Qcreated CCD measured on recent 1.4 mm thick pCVD wafer t - detector t hickness Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Marko Mikuž 5 Charge collected in pCVD diamonds • Electrodes stripped off and reapplied at will – Test dot → strip → pixel on same diamond • 90Sr source data well separated from pedestal <Qcol> = 11300 e <QMP> ~ 9000 e 99% of events above 4000 e FWHM/MP ~ 1 (~ 0.5 for Si) – Consequence of large non-homogeneity of pCVD material Qcol measured @ 0.8 V/μm Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Marko Mikuž 6 Charge collected in scCVD diamonds • CCD = thickness at E > 0.1 V/μm – Collect all created charge – “CCD” hardly makes sense FWHM/MP ~ 1/3 – scCVD material homogenous – Can measure diamond bulk properties with TCT scCVD measured in Ljubljana ~ same CCD as pCVD Current e-injection with α-particles Transient time Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Marko Mikuž 7 Radiation Damage - Basics Radiation induced effect Leakage current Operational consequence Diamond small & none decreases Space charge Charge trapping ~ none Operational consequence I/V = αΦ Heating α ~ 4x10-17 A/cm ΔNeff ≈ -βΦ Thermal runaway β ~ 0.15 cm-1 Increase of full depletion voltage Charge loss 1/τeff = βΦ Charge loss Polarization β ~ 5-7x10-16 cm2/ns Polarization none Yes Silicon Charge trapping the only relevant radiation damage effect Egap in diamond 5 times larger than in Si NIEL scaling questionable a priori Many processes freeze out Typical emission times order of months Like Si at 300/5 = 60 K – Boltzmann factor Lazarus effect ? Time dependent behaviour 1 eff N t (1 Pt ) t vth t A rich source of effects and (experimental) surprises ! Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Marko Mikuž 8 Radiation Damage - Diamond Data Done in context of RD-42 50 mm strip detectors (pixels !) read out by VA chip – S/N the measured parameter – calibrate noise to get charge Two 500 mm thick detectors, CCD0 ~150 mm Irradiated to 1.0 and 2.2x1015 p/cm2 at PS Two 500 mm thick detectors, CCD0 190 & 215 mm Irradiated to 6 and 18x1015 p/cm2 Fully evaluated in test beam S/N loss 57 → 49 → 47 (mean); 41 → 35 → 35 (MP) Resolution improvement 11.5 → 9.1 → 7.4 mm FWHM narrows: 54 → 41 → 36 ( FWHM/m 0.95→0.84→0.77) Source evaluation of S/N relative to before irradiation Highest fluence point evaluated also at 2 V/ mm (1000 V) 25 % of original signal retained → 33% at 2 V/ mm Test beam data taken, not fully analyzed yet 1 V/ mm 2 V/ mm Radiation homogenizes diamond – bulk damage starts to dominate Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Marko Mikuž 9 Radiation damage parameterization and NIEL W. de Boer et al. arXiv:0705.0171v1 In Si most damage scales with NIEL NIEL in C at high E an order of magnitude smaller than in Si NIEL scaling not established for diamonds For mean free path in infinite detector expect 1 1 k CCD CCD0 With CCD0 initial trapping on grain boundaries, k a damage constant Diamond with larger CCD0 degrades faster … but still performs better at any fluence Fresh data of irradiations available – analysis still preliminary scCVD with PS 24 GeV protons up to 2x1015 p/cm2 ; k~10-18 μm-1cm-2, ~same as old pCVD proton data pCVD with reactor neutrons up to 8x1015 neq/cm2; k~5x10-18 μm-1cm-2 pCVD with PSI 200 MeV pions up to 6x10 14 π/cm2 ; k consistent with ~2x10-18 μm-1cm-2 Looks roughly consistent with NIEL, neutron damage appears high – but no NIEL available for 1 MeV n on C ! Analysis ongoing, k have large uncertainties, too early to draw hard sLHC implications Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Marko Mikuž 10 Diamond Pixel Modules 3 modules built with ATLAS pixel chips @ OSU, IZM and Bonn 1 full (16 chip) pCVD module Test beam at DESY and CERN Irradiated to 5x1014 p/cm2 SPS test beam in August & October Module after bump bonding C-sensor in carrier Complete module under test 1 single-chip scCVD module CERN SPS test beam Irradiated to 5x1014 p/cm2 SPS test beam in August & October Pattern with In bumps 1 single-chip pCVD module Irradiated to 2x1015 p/cm2 Electronics heavily damaged Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 scCVD diamond ATLAS Upgrade Workshop scCVD module Marko Mikuž 11 pCVD full module Tests show no change of threshold and noise from bare chip to module – low sensor C & I Data from DESY test beam plagued by multiple scattering Noise 137 e, Threshold: mean 1450 e, spread 25 e, reproduced in test beams Many properties (e.g. resolution, time-walk) scale with S/N and S/T Silicon telescope resolution 7 mm (CERN) → 37 mm (DESY) Efficiency of 97.5 % a strict lower limit because of scattered tracks Data from last year’s CERN SPS test beam not fully analyzed yet CERN preliminary Preliminary residual 18 mm, unfolding telescope contribution of 11 mm yields 14 mm, consistent with digital 50/√12 = 14.4 Efforts to port the analysis code from Bonn Push towards complete analysis of SPS data of un-irradiated and irradiated module Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Noise = 137 e Thr = 1450 e = 18 mm Full module Bare chip Diamond pCVD Pixel Module – Results DESY Eff = 97.5 % Marko Mikuž 12 scCVD single chip module Preliminary analysis (M. Mathes, Bonn) of SPS test beam data exhibits excellent performance of the module Cluster signal nice Landau Preliminary efficiency 99.98 %, excluding 6/800 problematic electronic channels Residuals show pixel edge with ≈ 7 mm Cluster signal Track distribution Diamond scCVD Pixel Module – Results Eff = 99.98 % Charge sharing shows most of charge collected on single pixel – optimal for performance after (heavy) irradiation edge = 7 mm Looking forward to data of irradiated module ! Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Marko Mikuž 13 Diamonds in ATLAS BCM – 16 1x1 cm2 diamond pad detectors, TOT readout Test beam performance at end of readout chain exhibits median/noise ~ 11:1 Pixel BCM-stations Noise rate vs. thr2 Beam pipe Eff vs. thr Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Marko Mikuž 14 Diamond Sensors for Pixel sLHC Upgrade Move forward on two fronts Better understanding of sensor material – ongoing in RD-42 Radiation hardness – statistics, pions, neutrons, NIEL, trapping characterization etc. Material growth and processing optimization Search for suppliers alternative to Diamond Detectors Limited scCVD enlargement (larger samples ?, fusion ?) Build up experience with (irradiated) modules – ATLAS upgrade proposal (Carleton, CERN, Bonn, JSI, OSU, Toronto) Paramount to any upgrade proposal is to demonstrate experience with complete modules under realistic conditions, not bits and pieces Solve production issues – bump bonding on wafer level Get interest of material supplier(s) Gain experience with modules after irradiations Engineer a light(er) mass support structure of diamond detector layer(s) ? x 1016 represents a quantum leap in challenge Current electronics not suitable for tests much above 1015 Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Marko Mikuž 15 Backup – going edgeless scCVD module pattern scCVD single-chip module is edgeless – patterning right up to the edge Data exist on performance – needs to be analyzed Valencia, December 12-14, 2007 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Marko Mikuž 16