Diamond Module Prototypes for the ATLAS SLHC Pixel Detector Marko Mikuž University of Ljubljana & J. Stefan Institute PIXEL 2008 Workshop Fermilab, September 23-26 2008 Diamond tracker upgrade proposal Collaboration Bonn Carleton CERN Ljubljana Ohio State Toronto Submitted May’07 Updated Dec’07 Approved by ATLAS EB Mar’08 EDMS: ATU-RD-MN-0012 Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 2 R&D proposal goals Prove radiation tolerance of CVD diamond pixel prototypes) Industrialize bump bonding to diamond sensors (make 10 modules) Optimisation of front-end electronics Lightweight mechanical support – since minimal cooling required Financial resources sought to make 10 parts: Diamond sensors Bump-bonding contracts 200 FE-I3 + 25 MCC’s Module support prototypes Three year beam-test program (2008-2010) Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 3 Diamond as sensor material Property Diamond Silicon Band gap [eV] 5.5 1.12 Breakdown field [V/cm] 107 3x105 Intrinsic resistivity @ R.T. [Ω cm] > 1011 2.3x105 Intrinsic carrier density [cm-3] < 103 1.5x1010 Electron mobility [cm2/Vs] 1900 1350 Hole mobility [cm2/Vs] 2300 480 0.9(e)-1.4(h)x 107 0.82x 107 3.52 2.33 6 14 Dielectric constant - ε 5.7 11.9 Displacement energy [eV/atom] 43 13-20 Radiation hard Thermal conductivity [W/m.K] ~2000 150 Heat spreader Energy to create e-h pair [eV] 13 3.61 Radiation length [cm] 12.2 9.36 Spec. Ionization Loss [MeV/cm] 6.07 3.21 Aver. Signal Created / 100 μm [e0] 3602 8892 Aver. Signal Created / 0.1 X0 [e0] 4401 8323 Saturation velocity [cm/s] Density [g/cm3] Atomic number - Z Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Low leakage Low capacitance Low signal Marko Mikuž 4 Diamond sensor types - pCVD • Polycrystalline Chemical Vapour Deposition (pCVD) – – – – Grown in μ-wave reactors on non-diamond substrate Exist in Φ = 12 cm wafers, >2 mm thick Small grains merging with growth Grind off substrate side to improve quality → ~500-700 μm thick detectors – Base-line diamond material for pixel sensor Surface view of growth side Photo HK@OSU Side view Test dots on 1 cm grid Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 Photograph courtesy of E6 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 5 Diamond sensor types - scCVD • Single Crystal Chemical Vapour Deposition (scCVD) – Grown on HTHP diamond substrate – Exist in ~ 1 cm2 pieces, max 1.4 cm x 1.4 cm, thickness > 1 mm – A true single crystal Fall-forward for B-layer upgrade (single chips, wafers ?) After heavy irradiations expect similar properties to pCVD Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 6 Signal from pCVD diamonds • No processing: put electrodes on, apply electric field • Trapping on grain boundaries and in bulk – much like in heavily irradiated silicon • Parameterized with Charge Collection Distance, defined by Q col mean not most probable e 36 0 μm • CCD = average distance e-h pairs move apart • Coincides with mean free path in infinite (t ≫ CCD) detector d Qcol Qcreated t d d e d h distance e - h move apart t - detector t hickness Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop CCD measured on recent 1.4 mm thick pCVD wafer CCD of recent 0.5 mm thick pCVD detectors CCD @ 2 V/ mm Marko Mikuž 7 Radiation Damage - Basics Radiation induced effect Leakage current Space charge Diamond small & decreases ~ none Charge trapping Yes Operational consequence none Silicon Operational consequence I/V = αΦ Heating α ~ 4x10-17 A/cm ΔNeff ≈ -βΦ Thermal runaway β ~ 0.15 cm-1 Increase of full depletion voltage Charge loss 1/τeff = βΦ Charge loss Polarization β ~ 5-7x10-16 cm2/ns Polarization none Charge trapping the only relevant radiation damage effect Egap in diamond 5 times larger than in Si NIEL scaling questionable a priori Many processes freeze out Typical emission times order of months Like Si at 300/5 = 60 K – Boltzmann factor Lazarus effect ? Time dependent behaviour 1 eff N t (1 Pt ) t vth t A rich source of effects and (experimental) surprises ! Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 8 W. de Boer et al. In Si most damage scales with NIEL NIEL in C at high E an order of magnitude smaller than in Si NIEL violation observed for n vs. p damage in diamonds phys. stat. sol. (a) 204, No. 9 (2007)3009 Radiation damage parameterization and NIEL For mean free path in infinite detector expect 1 1 k CCD CCD0 With CCD0 initial trapping on grain boundaries, k a damage constant Larger CCD0 performs better (larger collected charge) at any fluence Can turn 1/ CCD0 into effective “initial” fluence, expect CCD0 ~ ∞ for SC Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 9 Diamond irradiations in 2007-08 Fresh data on irradiations available – analysis mostly still preliminary Done in context of RD-42 50 μm strip detectors (pixels !) read out by VA chip – S/N the measured parameter – calibrate noise to get charge Procedure: test-beam → irradiation → testbeam … scCVD (4) and pCVD (2) with PS 24 GeV protons up to 6x1015 p/cm2 (in 3 steps); k ~ 10-18 μm-1cm-2, ~same as old pCVD proton data pCVD (2) with reactor neutrons up to 1.3x1016 neq/cm2 (in 6 steps); k ~ 3-5x10-18 μm-1cm-2, discrepancy between source and test-beam pCVD with PSI 200 MeV pions up to 6x1014 π/cm2; k consistent with ~1-3x10-18 μm-1cm-2 Re-measured pCVD at 1.8x1016 p/cm2 result consistent with previous measurements KEK 70 MeV Pion vs. proton looks roughly consistent with NIEL, neutron damage appears high Radiation homogenizes diamond – bulk damage starts to dominate, k appears universal Analysis ongoing, k have large uncertainties, too early (and not easy) to draw hard sLHC implications Need pion data to at least 1015 p/cm2, preferably on SC (more sensitive) Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 10 Diamond Pixel Modules modules built with ATLAS pixel chips @ OSU, IZM and Bonn Module after bump bonding 1 full (16 chip) pCVD module Test beam at DESY and CERN Irradiated complete module to 1x1014 p/cm2 SPS test beam 2007 Irradiated to 7x1014 p/cm2 SPS test beam 2008 Analysis in progress C-sensor in carrier Complete module under test Pattern with In bumps 1 single-chip scCVD module CERN SPS test beam Irradiated complete module to 1 and 7 x1014 p/cm2 SPS test beam 2007, 2008 Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 scCVD diamond PIXEL 2008 Workshop scCVD module Marko Mikuž 11 pCVD full module Tests show no change of threshold and noise from bare chip to module – low sensor C & I Data from DESY test beam plagued by multiple scattering Noise 137 e, Threshold: mean 1450 e, spread 25 e, overdrive 800 e, reproduced in test beams Many properties (e.g. resolution, time-walk) scale with S/N and S/T Silicon telescope resolution 7 mm (CERN) → 37 mm (DESY) Efficiency of 97.5 % a strict lower limit because of scattered tracks Data from 2006 CERN SPS test beam not fully analyzed yet CERN Preliminary residual 18 mm, unfolding telescope contribution of 11 mm yields 14 mm, consistent with digital 50/√12 = 14.4 Analysis code ported from Bonn Push towards complete analysis of SPS data of un-irradiated and irradiated module Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Noise = 137 e Thr = 1450 e DESY = 18 mm Full module Bare chip Diamond pCVD Pixel Module – Results Eff = 97.5 % Marko Mikuž 12 Benefit of low C and I on pixel operation Diamond pixel sensor has ~3 x smaller C than planar Si (ε, d) Diamond has no Ileak Both effects combine into superior noise performance even in a non-optimized FE Lower noise Lower threshold Less overdrive (time-walk) Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 13 Analysis (M. Mathes PhD, Bonn) of SPS test beam data exhibits excellent module performance Cluster signal nice Landau Efficiency 99.98 %, excluding 6/800 problematic electronic channels Unfolded track resolution using η-algorithm from TOT exhibits ≈ 8.9 mm Charge sharing shows most of charge collected at high voltage on single pixel – optimal for performance after (heavy) irradiation 100 V 400 V = 8.9 mm TOT - η Track distribution Track resolution scCVD single chip module Cluster signal Diamond scCVD Pixel Module – Results Long side binary Data of irradiated (7x1014 p) module Preliminary analysis A. La Rosa, H. Pernegger Very sensitive to calibration ! Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 14 Strawman 2008 of ATLAS ID inner part @ sLHC Pixel layer 1: stave about 60 cm long at r ~ 3cm Radiation for 3000 fb-1 NIEL ~ 1.5 x 1016 cm-2 > 90 % from (π, K, p) 5-10 % from n About 0.12 (x2 ?) m2 of sensor in the innermost layer Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 15 Any technology fit for layer 1 ? Not really with current FE Peak Q @ ~ 900V 25000 Collected Charge Q [e-] 20000 Casse NIM A n-on-p FZ p irr .Casse IEEE07 n-on-p FZ n irr Affolder n-on-p FZ p irr Diamond 3D 2E ~150V, 210 um 3D 3E ~150V, 210 um 3D 4E ~150V, 210 um H. Sadrozinski, SLAC 6/08 2nd 15000 1rst Pixel Layer Pixel Layer 3D 4E 11800 3E 10600 2E 8600e 10000 5000 Signal required with present Pixel ASIC (= 2 x In-time threshold): Planar Si 7600e p/cm2 p/cm2 Diamond 4600e 0 0.0E+00 Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 5.0E+15 1.0E+16 Fluence [neq/cm2] PIXEL 2008 Workshop 1.5E+16 Marko Mikuž 16 Sensors - Diamond Detectors Ltd All results shown obtained with their sensors (RD42 has research contract with DDL) Outstanding purchase orders for three ATLAS pixel sensors First part cut from fully characterised wafer Suspect this had low as-grown collection distance ( 200μm) DDL will thin to improve CCD If resulting collection distance > 275μm we will accept (RD42 deal) Element6/DDL growing new wafers to satisfy other orders Delivery of pixel sensors expected by end of the year ATLAS upgrade project has resources to place orders for three more Waiting to see Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 17 Sensors - Alternative Suppliers Large wafer growth and processing capability Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 18 Thermo-mechanical considerations Have brain-stormed a number of options to thin readout layers Exploit thermal path through sensors to evacuate heat Allow modules to run at 30° - 40° Have started with “simple” analytical calculations Exploring FEA capabilities with TRIUMF engineer Plan to mock-up one or more solution(s) suggested by simulations Less than 2% X0 for a double layer of sensors looks feasible Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 19 Summary Good progress on all fronts, despite late start with ATLAS approval in March’08 Goals for 2009 Understanding of radiation hardness (RD42) Building pixel modules Test-beam data on strip and pixel modules Securing sensor supply (RD42) Start-up of thermo-mechanical studies Build & test 3-5 additional modules with FE-I3 Build & test assemblies with I4 prototype Diamonds are an option to be seriously considered for inner pixel layer at sLHC ! Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 20 Backup slides Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 21 Backup – Charge collected in pCVD diamonds • Electrodes stripped off and reapplied at will – Test dot → strip → pixel on same diamond • 90Sr source data well separated from pedestal <Qcol> = 11300 e <QMP> ~ 9000 e 99% of events above 4000 e FWHM/MP ~ 1 (~ 0.5 for Si) – Consequence of large non-homogeneity of pCVD material Qcol measured @ 0.8 V/μm Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 22 Charge collected in scCVD diamonds • CCD = thickness at E > 0.1 V/μm – Collect all created charge – “CCD” hardly makes sense FWHM/MP ~ 1/3 – scCVD material homogenous – Can measure diamond bulk properties with TCT scCVD measured in Ljubljana ~ same CCD as pCVD Current e-injection with α-particles Transient time Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 23 Single crystal irradiation results Single Crystal CVD (scCVD) Diamond irradiated to 1.5x1015p/cm2 PH distributions look narrow before and after irradiation In-time thresholds are ∼ threshold (1500e) + overdrive (800e) PH distributions after irradiation → η > 99%. Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 24 Going edgeless scCVD module pattern scCVD single-chip module is edgeless – patterning right up to the edge Data exist on performance – needs to be analyzed Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 25 Diamonds in ATLAS BCM – 16 1x1 cm2 diamond pad detectors, TOT readout Test beam performance at end of readout chain exhibits median/noise ~ 11:1 Noise performance in ATLAS consistent with previous experience Pixel BCM-stations Noise rate vs. thr2 Beam pipe Eff vs. thr Fermilab, September 23-26, 2008 PIXEL 2008 Workshop Marko Mikuž 26