July 2001
doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/356r0
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: [Comment Resolution for D0.92 of 802.15.1 Draft Standard]
Date Submitted: [10 July 2001]
Source: [Tom Siep] Company: []
Address: []
Voice:[(972) 496-0766], FAX: [], E-Mail:[tom.siep@ieee.org]
Re: [WPAN-802.15.1 LB11 Comment Resolution Results]
Abstract: [This presentation represents the results of the deliberations of the Ballot Resolution Committee for
comments received in Letter Ballot 11]
Purpose: [Inform the WG]
Notice:
This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion
and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject
to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or
withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and
may be made publicly available by P802.15.
Submission
Slide 1
Tom Siep
July 2001
doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/356r0
LB11 Comment Resolution
• LB11 was a Recirculation Ballot
• The Recirculation Ballot Review process considers:
– Changes made to the Draft D0.9.2 since the last ballot.
• The “must” to “shall” modification
• Minor editorial changes
– Unresolved negative comments from the previous ballot
• All comments were resolved in LB10. Resolutions were either:
– Accepted
– Declined
• One voter was unsatisfied with the disposition of his comments,
but a decline letter was sent and that resolved the outstanding
comments
Submission
Slide 2
Tom Siep
July 2001
doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/356r0
LB 11 Comment Analysis
•
•
•
•
13 New comments
3 Carried forward from LB10
44 Carried forward from LB8
No comments on changes made from LB10 to LB11
were made
Submission
Slide 3
Tom Siep
July 2001
doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/356r0
Consideration of LB11 Comments
• The BRC considered all comments lodged against
the draft
– 48 were editorial and would not prevent the proper
implementation of interoperable systems
– 12 were technical but have been considered and declined
before
– All declines were re-considered and previous decisions were
confirmed
– There were no new never-before-seen technical comments
Submission
Slide 4
Tom Siep
July 2001
doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/356r0
Going Forward
MOTION: The Working Group instructs the Chair of 802.15 to
submit Draft D0.9.2 to the SEC for review to forward the Draft to
Sponsor Ballot.
Moved: Tom Siep
Second: Michael Camp
Vote:
For:
Against:
Abstain:
NOTE: All comments from LB10 that were declined and not withdrawn will be
forwarded with the draft in document
01310r4aP802-15_WG-LB11-Comment-Form.pdf
Submission
Slide 5
Tom Siep