Joint Wireless Groups Architecture AdHoc 2005-07-01 Name Company

advertisement

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

Joint Wireless Groups Architecture AdHoc

Date: 2005-07-01

Name

Tom Siep

Company Address

CSR 2425 N. Central

Expressway, Suite

1000, Richardson,

TX 75080

Phone

+1 214 558

4358 email tom.siep@csr.com

Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.

Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE

Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.11.

Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf

>, including the statement

"IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair

< stuart.kerry@philips.com

> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at < patcom@ieee.org

>.

Submission Slide 1 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

Abstract

• Notes and slides from Ad Hoc meeting on

Architecture for 802 wireless standards held

17May05.

• Background slides are from 802.1

Architecture forum.

• Notes are on slide 9

• Output of meeting on slide 10

• NOTE : previous versions of slide 9 incorrectly had the number of “yes” votes as 13 instead of 3. Typo highlighted in RED

Submission Slide 2 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

Agenda for Ad Hoc Tuesday Evening

• PURPOSE: Brief ad hoc attendees and prepare for

Plenary meeting of 802.1 Architecture

• Consolidate 802.wireless community’s architecture issues

– Quality of Service

– Security

– Management

– Other?

• Determine if we, as the wireless 802 community, want to:

– Present a common set of issues

– Request formation of a TAG to address architecture issues

Submission Slide 3 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005

Last Name

Shusaku

Haixiang

Godfrey

Shinkichi

Lach

Hiertz

Lothar

O'Hara

Odman

Lusheng

Miller

Worstell

Falk

Buttar

Takashi

Keigo

McInnis

Njedjon

Callaway

Liu

Submission

Attendees (1 of 2) doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

First Name

Shimada

He

Tim

Ikeda

Hong-Yon

Guido R.

Skibov

Bob

Xiaoyu

Knut

Ji

Bob

Harry

Lars

Alistair

Aramaki

Aso

Mike

Eric

Ed

Email Address kodman@pulselink.net

lji@research.att.com

rrm@att.com

hworstell@att.com

lars.p.falk@-------.com

alistair.buttar@jp.panasonic.com

aramaki.takashi@jp.panasonic.com

aso.keigo@jp.panasonic.com

michael.d.mcinnis@boeing.com

eric.njedjon@francetelecom.com

ed.callaway@motorola.com

shusaku@ieee.org

haixiang@nortel.com

tim.godfrey@conerant.com

ikeda.shinkichi@jp.panasonic.com

hong-yon.lach@motorola.com

hiertz@ieee.org

lsr@comnets.--------.de

bob.ohara@cisco.com

xiaoyu.liu@samsung.com

Slide 4

WG

15

11

11

21

21

11

11

11

11

21

11

21

15

16

15

15

11

11

11

21

Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005

Last Name

Bahr

Zweis

Yongwon

Jin

Jeom

Song

Kim

Tan

Williams

Barber

Rajkumar

Kim

Henderson

Engwer

Zuniga

Chouiward

Decuir

Astrin

Kiernan

Hunter

Submission

Attendees (2 of 2) doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

First Name Email Address WG

Michael

Phillip

Ajay

Ronny (Yong-Ho)

G. Scott

Darwin

Juan Carlos

Gerald

Joe

Art

Michael

Johnny

Kwak

Lee

Soon Ik

Myungsun

Chang-Joo

Teik-Kheong

Brian

David michael.g.williams@nokia.com

pbarber@broadbandmobiletech.com

ajayrajkumar@lucent.com

ronnykim@lge.com

shenderson@rim.com

dengwer@nortel.com

j.c.zuniga@ieee.org

gerald.chouiward@crc.ca

joe@mcci.com

artastrin@aol.com

bahr@siemens.com

justjohnny@apple.com

yongwon@ige.com

jins978@ige.com

sijeon@etri.re.kr

mssong@etri.re.kr

cjkim@etri.re.kr

tktan@ieee.org

brian.kiernan@-----digital.com

hunter@timefactor.com

Slide 5

16

21

Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

11

11

21

21

22

22

22

22

11

11

11

22

15

11

21

16

21

21

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

Intent for 802.1 Arch Committee

• Improve alignment between WG projects and existing 802 architecture by:

– Identifying current problems, omissions, conflicts, ramifications, and their potential resolution

– Identifying potential refinements or changes to the architecture

– Providing a regular forum in which such discussion can take place, in a lower pressure environment than is possible during the core

Plenary cycle.

Submission Slide 6 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

Proposals for resolution

• Due diligence issues – need to fix 802 procedures

– TJ to propose to SEC that the rules for forwarding to SB &

RevCom be strengthened

– WGs should review projects against PAR/5C requirements during the development cycle

• Each WG:

– Prioritize issues

– Characterize the problem

– Propose approach to resolve, or identify as intractable

– Identify other groups (802 or external) that may be affected

Submission Slide 7 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

Pending 802.1 PARs

• Security

– This standard specifies unique per-device identifiers (DevID) and the management and cryptographic binding of a device to its identifiers, the relationship between an initially installed identity and subsequent locally significant identities, and interfaces and methods for use of DevIDs with existing and new provisioning and authentication protocols.

– See

11-05-xxxx-00-0000-Summary_of_PAR-5C_of_P802-1AL.ppt

• Management of RF

– This standard specifies protocols, procedures, and managed objects to support Radio Frequency (RF) management across IEEE 802 wireless Media Access Control (MAC) layers.

– See

11-05-xxxx-00-0000-Summary_of_PAR-5C_of_P802-1AM.ppt

Submission Slide 8 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

Discussions at Architecture Meeting

• ~60 people present (40 signed attendance sheet)

• Discussion turned initially to the 802.1AM PAR

– There was concern that 802.1 may not have the expertise to do the RF management task

– Question: Is management of an RF system fundamentally different than a wired system? Yes.

– Straw poll: “Do you favor approval of the 802.1AM PAR?” yes 3 ; no 20; reserve judgment 13

• Discussion then turned to what wireless groups need in common

– Straw poll: “Is a common language needed for wireless for communicating operational characteristics and status of dissimilar wireless systems?” yes 23; no 1; reserve judgement15

Submission Slide 9 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

Output from Wireless Architecture Ad Hoc

Discussions in Cairns

• Establish a joint wireless systems study group to address common 802 wireless issues consisting of representatives of the various wireless groups

– Focus on cooperation between wireless groups

– Might lead to formation of a TAG or WG or TGs within a WG or a standing committee

– Support coexistence or handoff efforts, not duplicating

– Investigate a common language for communicating operational characteristics and status of dissimilar wireless systems

• Action: representatives from all wireless groups to present the above request for approval

Submission Slide 10 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

BACKUP SLIDES:

802.15 Inputs to Arch Ad Hoc

Presented at Monterey

Submission Slide 11 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

Prioritized issues – 802.15

• Management

– LLC – acts as a block to passing additional

(e.g., QoS) parameters

– QoS

– (Signal) Power/channel management

• Bridging compatibility

– handling of multicasts, no clause 6 section for .1D

Submission Slide 12 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

LLC – acts as a block to passing additional

(e.g., QoS) parameters

• All 3 MAC need LLC support to requests to create/modify/terminate streams based on

QoS parameters

• Data needs to be able to be associated with a stream at the MAC SAP

• QoS changes need to be communicated to the higher layers

• Need to be able to inquire QoS characteristics of remote nodes

Submission Slide 13 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

QoS

• Block asynchronous data

– Need block size to plan and allocate resources

Submission Slide 14 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

(Signal) Power/channel management

• Need a way to pass (up and down) information that is important to wireless, for example

– Transmit power

– Regulatory domain

– Signal quality

– Coexistence information

– Other

• Must be extensible

Submission Slide 15 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

Bridging compatibility – handling of multicasts, no clause 6 section for .1D

• Compatibility with .1D

– 15.1a – Bridging is handled in BNEP, which maps to Ethernet.

– 15.3 – Annex A (normative) specifies compatibility

– 15.4 – Annex A (normative) specifies compatibility

• Multicasts

– 15.1a – does not do multicast

– 15.3 – Had multicast, being revised in current work

– 15.4 – Had broadcast, being revised to include multicast in current work

Submission Slide 16 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

Other Groups Affected

• LLC – acts as a block

 802.1 and 802.2

• QoS

 802.1 and 802.2

• (Signal) Power/channel management

 802.1 and 802.2

• Bridging compatibility – internal problem being worked

Submission Slide 17 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

May 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.1105-0623-00-0000

Work to be done by 802.15

• Form plans to solve issues

• Determine feasibility of plans

• Study proposal to use IETF model for

QoS – will it work for .15 TGs?

• Characterize management function needs

• Can’t do bridging 64 to 48 bit addresses

– are we OK with this?

Submission Slide 18 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio

Download