File

advertisement

2-1

CHAPTER TWO

S

TRATEGY AND

T

ACTICS OF

D

ISTRIBUTIVE

B

ARGAINING

INB 350 Lecture

By: Ms. Adina Malik (ALK)

T HE D ISTRIBUTIVE B ARGAINING

 Distributive Bargaining occurs when the goals of one party are in fundamental and direct conflict with the goals of the other party.

 It is also called Competitive , or Win-Lose Bargaining

 Both parties want to Maximize the Value obtained in a single deal.

2-2

T

HE

D

ISTRIBUTIVE

B

ARGAINING

S

ITUATION

 Conflicting Goals

 Resources are fixed and limited

 Time is limited

 Relationship is not important

 Maximizing one’s own share of resources is the goal

 A conflict situation

 Every party has to use this strategy during claiming value stage

2-3

T

HE

D

ISTRIBUTIVE

B

ARGAINING

S

ITUATION

Things to know:

Target point (aspiration point, optimal goal, preferred price)

Walk-away (bottom line, resistance point, reservation price)

Asking price (seller)

Initial offer (buyer)

2-4

T HE D ISTRIBUTIVE B ARGAINING

S ITUATION

Mr. Rahim (Buyer) wants to buy a 55 inch LED TV. His target price is TK. 135,000. His resistance point , the price beyond which Mr. Rahim won’t go, is TK. 150,000. So TK. 150,000 is the reservation point or bottom line –the most he will pay as a buyer and the least amount for which the seller will settle for.

Now Mr. Helal (The Seller) is selling a 55 inch LED TV and his asking price is TK. 145,000, which is also known as initial offer .

2-5

T HE D ISTRIBUTIVE B ARGAINING

S ITUATION

Party A - Helal- Seller

Walkaway Point Target Point Asking Price

TK 145,000

Initial Offer Target Point Walkaway Point

TK 135,000 TK 150,000

Party B – Rahim- Buyer

2-6

T HE D ISTRIBUTIVE B ARGAINING

S ITUATION

 Deciding Initial Offer of the Buyer (Rahim):

 Mr. Rahim cannot open negotiation at his target point

(135,000 TK). He has to make lower initial offer to make room for making concession.

 If Rahim open negotiation at his target point afterward when he has to make concessions then he will move more closer to the resistant point.

 However if the buyer (Rahim) makes the first offer too low (TK 100,000) the seller might break off negotiation believing the buyer is not interested* .

2-7

T HE D ISTRIBUTIVE B ARGAINING

S ITUATION

Party B – Rahim- Buyer Party A - Helal- Seller

R- Initial P

130,000 133,000

R- Target Point

135,000 140,000

H- Initial P

145,000

R- Res. P

150,000

2-8

T HE D ISTRIBUTIVE B ARGAINING

S ITUATION

Both parties have starting, target and resistance points.

 Starting points* are disclosed in the opening statement. (133,000 – Mr. Rahim)

 Target points are usually learned or inferred as negotiations proceeds, however , it is not usually disclosed at first.

 Reservation points should always be kept secret.

( 150,000 – Mr. Rahim)

2-9

T HE D ISTRIBUTIVE B ARGAINING

S ITUATION

Party A - Helal- Seller

Party B – Rahim- Buyer

H- Res P inferred

R- Initial P

Public

R- Target Point

Private

H- Target P inferred

H- Asking P public

R- Res. P private

Tk.

130,000

Tk.

133,000

Tk.

135,000

Tk.

140,000

Tk.

145,000

Tk.

150,000

2-10

T HE D ISTRIBUTIVE B ARGAINING

S ITUATION : B ARGAINING R ANGE

 The spread between the resistance points (150-130) called the Bargaining Range/Settlement Range/Zone of

Potential Agreement.

 If the buyer’s resistance point is above the seller then there is a positive bargaining range (130 - 150)

 If the seller’s resistance point is above the buyer then there is a negative bargaining range (130-125)

*This thing can be resolved only if one or both parties are persuaded to change their resistance points

2-11

T HE R OLE OF A LTERNATIVES TO A

N EGOTIATED A GREEMENT

 Alternatives give the negotiator power to walk away from the negotiation: BATNA

If alternatives are attractive, negotiators can:

Set their goals higher

Make fewer concessions

If there are no attractive alternatives:

Negotiators have much less bargaining power

 Negotiators need to have clear understanding of their BATNA.

Good bargainers always try to improve their alternatives. BATNA clarifies what the negotiators will do if the agreement is not reached

2-12

T HE R OLE OF A LTERNATIVES TO A

N EGOTIATED A GREEMENT

Party B – Rahim- Buyer

Party A - Helal- Seller

H- Res P inferred

R- Initial P

Public

R- Target Point

Private

H- Target P inferred

H- Initial P public

R- Res. P private

130,000 133,000 135,000

H- Alternative

Private

134,000

140,000 145,000

R- Alternative

Private

142,000

150,000

2-13

S ETTLEMENT P OINTS

 The fundamental process of distributive bargaining is to reach a settlement within a positivebargainingrange .

 The agreement should be the best possible result both the parties could get - both the parties should be satisfied with the outcome.

 Both parties should belief that the settlement is the best they can get (although it might be less desirable than their preference).

2-14

B ARGAINING M IX

 In almost all negotiations, agreement is necessary on several issues:

 Price

 Closing Date* of the sale

 Other items related to the agreement

 The package of issues for negotiation is the bargaining mix.

Each item in the mix has its own starting, target and resistance points.

2-15

F UNDAMENTAL S TRATEGIES

1.

2.

3.

4.

The prime objective of distributive bargaining is to maximize the value of the current deal.

There are four fundamental strategies:

Push for settlement near opponent’s resistance point

Get the other party to change their resistance point

If settlement range is negative, either:

Get the other side to change their resistance point

Modify your own resistance point

Convince the other party that the settlement is the best possible

2-16

K EYS TO THE S TRATEGIES

The keys to implementing any of the four strategies are:

 Discovering the other party’s resistance point

 Information is the life force of negotiation

 Influencing the other party’s resistance point

The value the other attaches to a particular outcome

The cost the other attaches to delay or difficulty in negotiation

The cost the other attaches to having the negotiation aborted

2-17

T ACTICAL T ASKS OF N EGOTIATORS

Tactics:

 Assess the other party’s target, resistance point, and the costs of terminating negotiation

Manage the other party’s impressions

Modify the other party’s perceptions

Manipulate the actual costs of delay or termination

2-18

T ACTICAL T ASKS OF N EGOTIATORS

Assess the other party’s target, resistance point, and the costs of terminating negotiation

 Indirect Assessment: Determining what information an individual likely used to set target and resistance points and how he or she interpreted this information.

 Direct Assessment: Opponent reveals the accurate information when pushed to the absolute limit and in need of a quick settlement (time shortage).

2-19

T ACTICAL T ASKS OF N EGOTIATORS

Manage the Other Party’s Impressions

 Important Tactical Taskconceal and control information (target and resistance points) sent to other party.

 Screening activities are more important at the beginning of the negotiation, and direct action is more useful later on.

 Screen your behavior:

 Say and do as little as possible. ‘Silence is golden.’

 Direct action to alter impressions:

Present facts that enhance one’s position

Negotiators should justify their case through selective presentation - presenting facts necessary to support their cases.

2-20

D

IRECT ACTION TO

A

LTER

I

MPRESSIONS

 Displaying emotional reaction to facts, proposals, and possible outcome is another form of direct action-

 A loud, angry outburst or an eager response; disappointment or enthusiasm-> important issue

 Casual acceptance; boredom or indifference-> trivial issue or unimportant

Presentation of Information

 Elaborate-> important

 Concise-> trivial

2-21

P

OSITIONS

T

AKEN

D

URING

N

EGOTIATIONS

 At the beginning of the negotiation each party takes a position.

 Changes in position will occur as new information concerning the other’s intention, the value of outcomes, concessions, and likely zone for settlement will come fore.

 Opening offer

 Where will you start?

 Too Low

 Too High

 Modest

2-22

P OSITIONS T AKEN

D URING N EGOTIATIONS

Opening stance

 What is your attitude?

Competitive? Moderate?

A reasonable bargaining position is usually coupled with a friendly stance

An exaggerated bargaining position is usually coupled with a tougher more competitive stance

2-23

P OSITIONS T AKEN

D URING N EGOTIATIONS

 Final offer (making a commitment)

 “This is all I can do” or ‘’This is as far as I can go’’

2-24

C OMMITMENT

 Commitment is an agreement or pledge to do something in the future.

 It removes ambiguity about the actor’s intended course of action.

 However it also limits the option and sometimes interpreted as threat to other party.

2-25

C

OMMITMENTS

:

T

ACTICAL

C

ONSIDERATIONS

Establishing a commitment

Three properties: A high degree of Finality , a high degree of

Specificity & a clear statement of Consequences . For example:

We need a raise or there will be trouble (less powerful)

We must have 10% raise in our salary or we will go for strike from next month (more powerful)

2-26

S UMMARY

Strategies for Distributive Negotiation

:

Stg-1: Assess your BATNA and improve it

Stg-2: Determine your reservation point but do not reveal it.

Stg-3: Research other party’s BATNA and estimate their reservation point

Stg-4: Set high Aspiration: but do not pursue lowball/highball tactics

*Unrealistically low/high estimate (bid)

2-27

S UMMARY

Stg-5: Make the first offer

 if you are prepared and have sufficient information make the first offer because it act an anchor point.

Stg-6: Appear to norm of fairness

Stg-7: Plan your concessions

Stg-8: Try not to exceed your reservation point

2-28

Download