AP® Human Geography Workshop Population Dynamics in the Rural Midwest: Causes and Consequences Tim Strauss Department of Geography University of Northern Iowa 89th Annual Meeting of the National Council for Geographic Education Kansas City, Missouri, October 22, 2004 Overview Introduction Population Trends Possible Causes Consequences/Implications Conclusion Introduction: The “Layers” of Geography Human and physical geography. Systematic and regional geography. Systematic Culture Language Religion Demographics Economic systems Political systems Topography Climate etc., etc., etc. Regional Geography can be seen as a complex interaction of different “layers” Introduction World Regional – regional focus and organization Human Geography – organized by sub-discipline/ layer Layers often addressed separately Importance of interaction across layers Introduction, population, migration, culture, language, religion, agriculture, urban, political, etc. Requires integrated analysis, multidisciplinary approach Today, using population change as an example Focus on Midwest/Iowa Population Trends Population Growth by State in the 1990s Population Change, 1990-2000 Increase 20% or more Source: Office of Social and Economic Trend Analysis, Iowa State University Population Change, 1990-2000 Increase 10% or more Source: Office of Social and Economic Trend Analysis, Iowa State University Population Change, 1990-2000 Increase 5% or more Source: Office of Social and Economic Trend Analysis, Iowa State University Population Change, 1990-2000 Nationwide + 13.2% + 0.5% + 8.5% + 12.4% + 9.6% + 6.9% + 8.4% + 8.5% + 5.4% + 4.7% + 8.6% + 9.7% + 9.3% Source: Office of Social and Economic Trend Analysis, Iowa State University Population Trends Population Growth by State in the 1990s Population Growth by State in the 20th Century Population Change, 1900-2000 Increase 500% or more Source: Office of Social and Economic Trend Analysis, Iowa State University Population Change, 1900-2000 Increase 100% or more Source: Office of Social and Economic Trend Analysis, Iowa State University Population Change, 1900-2000 Increase 50% or more Source: Office of Social and Economic Trend Analysis, Iowa State University Population Trends Population Growth by State in the 1990s Population Growth by State in the 20th Century Statewide Population Growth in Iowa Projected Population in Iowa 3.5 Millions 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 1900 20 40 60 80 2000 2020 Projections by Woods & Poole Economics, Inc., 2004 Source: Office of Social and Economic Trend Analysis, Iowa State University Population Trends Population Growth by State in the 1990s Population Growth by State in the 20th Century Statewide Population Growth in Iowa County-level Changes in Population metropolitan vs. non-metropolitan trends Population Change, 1990-2000 One dot = 10 persons Increased Decreased 1 dot = 10 persons Blue = Increase Pink = Decrease Source: Office of Social and Economic Trend Analysis, Iowa State University Most counties experienced their peak population decades ago ISU Census Services metropolitan vs. non-metropolitan pattern The trend is expected to continue Population Trends Population Growth by State in the 1990s Population Growth by State in the 20th Century Statewide Population Growth in Iowa County-level Changes in Population Components of Demographic Change Birth Rates and Death Rates In- vs. Out-Migration Births and Deaths Iowa Thousands 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1940 1950 1960 Births 1970 1980 1990 2000 Deaths ISU Census Services Natural Change, 1990–2000 More births than deaths More deaths than births ISU Census Services http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/censr-9.pdf Net Migration in Iowa 1910s 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 0 -150,000 -100,000 -180,000 -250,000 -180,000 -60,000 -280,000 +49,000 ISU Census Services http://www.seta.iastate.edu/population/ publications/migration_inout_iowa_95002.pdf Migration largely follows expected patterns - Gravity model - nearby states, large states - South/West vs. East/North http://www.seta.iastate.edu/population/publications /ia_inout_migrant_age_charx_9500.pdf 1 dot = 2 persons 1 dot = 2 persons http://www.seta.iastate.edu/population/publications /ia_inout_migrant_age_charx_9500.pdf Possible Causes Trends in Agriculture Declining percentage of workforce in farming Consolidation - Fewer, larger farms Iowa Farm Numbers and Size 108000 345.0 106000 340.0 335.0 104000 325.0 100000 320.0 98000 315.0 96000 310.0 94000 305.0 92000 300.0 19 88 19 89 19 90 19 91 19 92 19 93 19 94 19 95 19 96 19 97 Farms 102000 Year Acres 330.0 Farms Acres/Farm d Mark Drabenstott 1998 This Little Piggy Went To Market: Will The New Pork Industry Call the Heartland Home? Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (http://www.kc.frb.org/publicat/econrev/pdf/3q98drab.pdf) Mark Drabenstott 1998 This Little Piggy Went To Market: Will The New Pork Industry Call the Heartland Home? Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (http://www.kc.frb.org/publicat/econrev/pdf/3q98drab.pdf) Possible Causes Trends in Agriculture Migration Preferences Young adult/student preferences Employment opportunities, incomes, cultural amenities, climate “Co-location” issue Metropolitan orientation of college-educated couples http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/p20-549.pdf Human Geography class: Number of students selecting each state as their most preferred (“Y”) or least preferred (“N”) to live in after graduation Human Geography class: Student responses regarding whether they would like to leave Iowa (=1) or stay in Iowa (=5) after graduation, by home town of the student http://www.seta.iastate.edu/population/publications /ia_in_out_mirrant_ed_attain_charx_9500.pdf Per Capita Income Iowa Thousands $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 1970 1975 1980 U.S 1985 1990 1995 2000 Iowa ISU Census Services Per Capita Income, 1998 Iowa = $24,745 Higher than the state average Lower than the state average ISU Census Services Consequences/Implications Demographic Profile Age Consequences/Implications Demographic Profile Retail Trade Patterns Central Place Theory Settlement Pattern - but is the pattern static? Actual Settlement Pattern in Iowa Southwest Iowa, 1934 Grocery Stores Hospitals Legal Advice Discussed in Berry 1988 Market Centers and Retail Location: Theory and Applications Long history of retail trade studies in Iowa As expected, more retail sales in more populated counties - but what if we do per capita comparisons? Data from the Iowa State Extension Retail Trade Analysis Program Pull Factor = town (or county) per capita retail sales / state per capita retail sales http://www.seta.iastate.edu/retail/publications/seta_retail_guide.pdf Data from the Iowa State Extension Retail Trade Analysis Program Data from the Iowa State Extension Retail Trade Analysis Program Data from the Iowa State Extension Retail Trade Analysis Program Data from the Iowa State Extension Retail Trade Analysis Program Data from the Iowa State Extension Retail Trade Analysis Program Iowa County Taxable Retail Sales Per Capita, FY2003 OSCEOLA LYON DICKINSON EMMET O'BRIEN SIOUX $6,899 CLAY PALO ALTO $6,733 $12,009 $5,371 MITCHELL WINNESHIEK ALLAMAKEE HOWARD $6,006 $2,637 $5,051 $5,453 $4,972 $13,885 $8,331 $4,533 WORTH WINNEBAGO KOSSUTH $6,553 HANCOCK CERRO GORDO FLOYD $7,088 $6,176 CHICKASAW $5,587 $12,134 $5,837 $5,690 FAYETTE BUENA VISTA POCAHONTAS HUMBOLDT CHEROKEE PLYMOUTH WRIGHT BREMER FRANKLIN BUTLER $6,628 $7,514 $4,112 $6,414 $5,914 $5,017 $3,743 $6,175 $6,048 BLACK HAWK WEBSTER SAC IDA HARDIN HAMILTON CALHOUN CLAYTON $5,331 $4,710 DELAWARE BUCHANAN DUBUQUE GRUNDY $10,942 $5,246 $5,410 $10,739 $11,064 $5,624 $4,896 $3,380 $10,977 $5,445 $7,814 $4,713 JACKSON WOODBURY BENTON TAMA CRAWFORD MONONA GREENE CARROLL BOONE STORY JONES MARSHALL LINN $7,335 $14,111 $6,155 $5,750 $10,035 $5,891 $6,049 $9,096 $8,806 $5,136 $5,063 CEDAR HARRISON SHELBY AUDUBON GUTHRIE JASPER POLK DALLAS POWESHIEK $6,385 $10,517 $11,440 $3,951 $5,606 $4,422 $4,831 $7,234 $16,050 $8,859 POTTAWATTAMIE $9,865 MILLS Sales Per Capita Less than $5000 $5000 to $7500 $7500 to $9778 More than $9778 CASS ADAIR MADISON WARREN MARION JOHNSON IOWA MAHASKA KEOKUK MONTGOMERY ADAMS UNION CLARKE LUCAS MONROE WAPELLO JEFFERSON MUSCATINE $8,418 WASHINGTON $7,210 $5,933 $5,087 $4,749 $6,842 $6,796 $2,808 $5,875 $4,431 LOUISA $2,104 HENRY DES MOINES $3,206 $6,194 $5,166 $8,825 $6,102 $4,018 $4,823 $8,458 $9,204$6,265 $10,714 VAN BUREN APPANOOSE FREMONT DAVIS PAGE TAYLOR RINGGOLD WAYNE DECATUR $6,690 $5,026 $3,255 $7,497 $3,337 $3,421 $5,836 $4,616 $2,864 LEE $7,360 State Sales Per Capita = $9,778 Iowa State Extension Retail Trade Analysis Program $5,159 CLINTON $7,726 SCOTT $12,855 Iowa County Taxable Retail Sales Pull Factors, FY2003 OSCEOLA LYON 0.51 0.46 DICKINSON 1.42 O'BRIEN SIOUX CLAY 0.85 PALO ALTO 0.55 1.23 0.69 0.71 EMMET WORTH KOSSUTH WINNEBAGO 0.61 0.27 0.67 HANCOCK CERRO GORDO 0.57 MITCHELL 0.52 1.24 WINNESHIEK ALLAMAKEE HOWARD 0.56 0.72 FLOYD CHICKASAW 0.60 0.58 0.63 FAYETTE CHEROKEE PLYMOUTH 0.77 0.68 0.62 BUENA VISTA POCAHONTAS HUMBOLDT WRIGHT 0.66 0.42 0.60 0.51 HAMILTON HARDIN IDA WOODBURY CALHOUN 0.58 0.50 1.13 0.35 1.12 CLAYTON BLACK HAWK BUCHANAN DELAWARE DUBUQUE 1.12 0.54 0.55 1.10 0.63 BUTLER 0.38 WEBSTER SAC 0.55 BREMER FRANKLIN GRUNDY 0.80 0.48 0.56 MONONA CARROLL GREENE 0.59 1.03 0.60 0.62 0.52 BOONE MARSHALL STORY 0.90 0.93 JACKSON BENTON TAMA CRAWFORD 0.48 JONES 0.63 LINN 0.75 1.44 0.53 CLINTON CEDAR GUTHRIE DALLAS POLK JASPER POWESHIEK IOWA 0.57 0.45 0.49 0.74 1.64 0.91 0.65 1.08 SHELBY HARRISON 0.40 AUDUBON JOHNSON 0.45 1.17 MUSCATINE CASS POTTAWATTAMIE Pull Factors 0 to 0.50 0.50 to 1.00 1.00 to 2.00 MADISON MONTGOMERY ADAMS UNION MARION WARREN 0.74 0.61 0.52 0.49 1.01 MILLS ADAIR CLARKE MAHASKA MONROE 0.33 0.63 0.53 0.90 0.62 0.41 0.49 FREMONT PAGE TAYLOR RINGGOLD DECATUR WAYNE 0.68 0.51 0.33 0.77 0.34 0.35 Iowa State Extension Retail Trade Analysis Program KEOKUK 0.70 0.70 LUCAS 0.53 APPANOOSE 0.60 0.29 0.60 WAPELLO 0.86 WASHINGTON JEFFERSON LOUISA HENRY 0.22 0.94 0.64 1.10 0.47 0.29 0.75 0.86 DAVIS DES MOINES VAN BUREN LEE 0.79 SCOTT 1.31 Iowa County Taxable Retail Sales Surplus or Leakage, FY2003 OSCEOLA LYON -$29 -$23 $45 O'BRIEN SIOUX CLAY -$2 WORTH KOSSUTH WINNEBAGO -$17 -$42 -$18 HANCOCK CERRO GORDO PALO ALTO -$27 $42 -$15 -$35 EMMET DICKINSON -$33 MITCHELL WINNESHIEK ALLAMAKEE HOWARD -$26 -$35 $81 -$30 -$25 FLOYD CHICKASAW -$44 -$46 FAYETTE CHEROKEE PLYMOUTH BUENA VISTA POCAHONTAS HUMBOLDT -$19 -$25 -$63 WRIGHT BREMER FRANKLIN -$22 -$36 -$35 -$32 -$63 -$75 BUTLER BLACK HAWK WEBSTER SAC IDA WOODBURY CALHOUN $82 -$18 -$28 -$46 $135 HARDIN HAMILTON CRAWFORD CARROLL -$29 $33 -$27 GREENE -$53 -$19 -$70 BOONE MARSHALL STORY -$17 -$87 -$98 -$11 CLAYTON BUCHANAN DELAWARE DUBUQUE -$45 $93 -$52 $182 -$58 GRUNDY JACKSON BENTON TAMA MONONA -$49 JONES -$53 -$37 $406 -$25 LINN CLINTON CEDAR SHELBY HARRISON -$68 AUDUBON GUTHRIE JASPER POLK DALLAS -$30 -$19 -$37 -$149 $1,310 -$38 POWESHIEK IOWA -$54 -$5 JOHNSON -$86 -$58 MUSCATINE CASS POTTAWATTAMIE $59 Surplus or Leakage -$250 million to -$50 million -$50 million to -$10 million -$10 million to $0 $0 and above (surplus) MILLS -$9 MONTGOMERY MADISON ADAIR MARION MAHASKA KEOKUK ADAMS -$87 -$24 -$10 FREMONT RINGGOLD TAYLOR -$11 -$46 -$26 $13 Iowa State Extension Retail Trade Analysis Program $2 CLARKE LUCAS MONROE -$31 -$38 -$27 DECATUR WAYNE APPANOOSE WAPELLO $20 DAVIS -$46 WASHINGTON -$18 -$62 -$212 -$95 -$45 -$46 -$52 UNION PAGE WARREN -$51 JEFFERSON $3 VAN BUREN -$22 -$20 -$29 -$16 -$34 LOUISA -$71 HENRY -$47 $52 DES MOINES LEE -$48 -$57 SCOTT $425 Iowa County Taxable Retail Sales Surplus or Leakage as a % of Potential Sales, FY2003 OSCEOLA LYON EMMET DICKINSON KOSSUTH WORTH WINNEBAGO MITCHELL WINNESHIEK ALLAMAKEE HOWARD -20% -67% -33% -39% -17% -22% -14% -34% 17% -31% -38% -14% -13% 25% -33% -46% 24% -2% -30% O'BRIEN SIOUX CLAY HANCOCK CERRO GORDO PALO ALTO FLOYD CHICKASAW FAYETTE CLAYTON -30% -38% -25% -34% -30% -39% -53% -18% -14% -48% CHEROKEE BUENA VISTA POCAHONTASHUMBOLDT PLYMOUTH -30% WRIGHT FRANKLIN BREMER BUTLER BLACK HAWK BUCHANAN WEBSTER DELAWARE DUBUQUE 15% -35% -31% 11% 13% -29% -34% -55% 23% -37% -12% -54% -16% -33% -16% -36% 17% -35% -23% 19% -22% -35% -12% -3% -13% -52% -52% -29% -39% -40% -32% 27% -10% -31% -3% -4% 26% -12% 7% -8% -28% -46% -52% -30% -23% -59% -30% -73% -65% -26% -30% 14% -36% -50% -42% 7% 2% -27% 13% -17% -36% -53% 6% -44% -47% -27% -29% -61% -15% SAC IDA WOODBURY HARDIN HAMILTON CALHOUN GRUNDY CRAWFORD MONONA GREENE CARROLL BOONE JACKSON BENTON TAMA JONES MARSHALL STORY LINN CLINTON CEDAR HARRISON SHELBY AUDUBON GUTHRIE JASPER POLK DALLAS POWESHIEK IOWA JOHNSON SCOTT MUSCATINE POTTAWATTAMIE CASS ADAIR MADISON WARREN MARION MAHASKA KEOKUK WASHINGTON LOUISA MILLS MONTGOMERY ADAMS UNION CLARKE LUCAS MONROE WAPELLO JEFFERSON HENRY DES MOINES Surplus or Leakage, % -80% to -40% -40$ to -20% -20% to 0% 0% and above FREMONT PAGE TAYLOR RINGGOLD DECATUR WAYNE APPANOOSE DAVIS VAN BUREN LEE Iowa State Extension Retail Trade Analysis Program Consequences/Implications Demographic Profile Retail Trade Patterns School Consolidation Certified and Projected K-12 Enrollment*, Iowa 600 Thousands 500 400 300 200 100 0 1995 1997 1999 2000 Certified * Includes only public schools 2002 2004 Projected ISU Census Services School Consolidation Decline in number of school districts Early 1900s: 12,000 (schoolhouses) By 1932: 4,875 By 1996: 501 Now: 367 Proposal to merge districts with a high school having <200 students 147 such districts in Iowa Concerns about access to advanced math, science, and other classes Waterloo/Cedar Falls Courier, 10/2/04 (www.wcfcourier.com) Quad-City Times (www.qctimes.com) Change in Population 17 Years of Age or Younger, 1990–2000 Increase Decrease ISU Census Services Consequences/Implications Demographic Profile Retail Trade Patterns School Consolidation Political Balance Effect on urban/rural issues in state-level politics National-level shifts in the political balance State-level shifts in the political balance: Iowa Senate State-level shifts in the political balance: Iowa House Consequences/Implications Demographic Profile Retail Trade Patterns School Consolidation Political Balance County Consolidation County Consolidation County boundaries same since 1871 Designed for one-day round trip from farm to courthouse Brookings Institution recommended county consolidation Suggested 25 instead of 99 counties Des Moines Register, 3/21/1999 (www.dmregister.com) 1900: Polk County population (82,624) exceeds that of 7 smallest counties (74,977) Data from the Des Moines Register, 3/21/1999 (www.dmregister.com) 1930: Polk County population (172,837) exceeds that of 14 smallest counties (163,721) Data from the Des Moines Register, 3/21/1999 (www.dmregister.com) 1998: Polk County population (359,826) exceeds that of 37 smallest counties (354,519) Data from the Des Moines Register, 3/21/1999 (www.dmregister.com) County Consolidation Brookings Institution study was done in 1933 Since then, 64 counties have lost population, 35 have gained Consolidation is not a popular idea Community identity and vitality Political balance Des Moines Register, 3/21/1999 (www.dmregister.com) Consequences/Implications Demographic Profile Retail Trade Patterns School Consolidation Political Balance County Consolidation Patterns of Religious Affiliation Iowa is more Methodist, more Lutheran, less Catholic, and less Baptist than the US as a whole. - Iowa is normally split between Lutheran and Methodist regions on maps of US religious affiliation Data and Graph: James F. Fryman UNI Geography Dept. Denominational group by metropolitan vs. non-metropolitan location e.g., historically, Methodists more rural than US population as a whole Zelinsky, Wilbur 1961, An Approach to the Religious Geography of the United States: Patterns of Church Membership in 1952, Annals of the AAG. Generally, growth in numbers of churches in metropolitan areas, declines in rural areas Data and Map: James F. Fryman UNI Geography Dept. Methodists have a largely rural spatial distribution in Iowa American Religion Data Archive (www.thearda.com) Roman Catholics: increase in affiliation, 1950-1990 - Effect of metro vs. non-metro and regional (e.g., NE Iowa) orientation? - Effect of in-migration? Methodists: decline in affiliation, 1950-1990 - Effect of rural orientation? What processes are involved? Data and Graph: James F. Fryman UNI Geography Dept. Conclusions The above trends cannot be considered in isolation from each other Relevance to APHG curriculum Links across sections of the course outline Cause-and-effect relationships Synthesis Process-oriented analysis Changes in patterns over time Scale