Value-Added Overview Sapulpa Public Schools August 16, 2012 Our Mission The mission of Sapulpa Public Schools, in partnership with the community, is to provide a premier education to ensure that every student achieves success in a global society. Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Sapulpa Public Schools’ Self-Assessment 1 Roadie 5 Back-up Singer 10 Rock Star Copyright, 2011. Battelle for Kids. Learning Targets Understand why value-added analysis provides a more complete picture of school and teacher effectiveness. Understand how harnessing the power of two, achievement and progress, provides a more robust picture of school improvement. Develop a conceptual understanding of growth metrics Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. National Landscape “Education is no longer a pathway to opportunity and success. It is a prerequisite for success.” -President Barack Obama, March 2009 Copyright, 2011. Battelle for Kids. National Landscape No Child Left Behind (NCLB) has brought an increased focus on student achievement results for schools, school systems and specific groups of students within schools. Copyright, 2011. Battelle for Kids. National Landscape “With increased accountability, American schools and the people who work in them are being asked to do something new—to engage in systemic, continuous improvement in the quality of the educational experience of students and to subject themselves to the discipline of measuring their success by the metric of students’ academic performance.” -Richard Elmore, Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Achievement Copyright, 2011. Battelle for Kids. National Landscape Across the country, growth models are helping schools identify strengths, challenges and opportunities throughout the system. Growth analysis brings a new and critically important kind of diagnostic information to allow districts to be strategic and focused in their decision-making. Copyright, 2011. Battelle for Kids. National Landscape For the first time in the history of American education, the definition of “great” teachers is grounded in the students’ academic growth, not just student achievement. The difference is subtle but extremely important. Copyright, 2011. Battelle for Kids. Let’s Consider… What are some ways that we determine our effectiveness as teachers? Are some ways more insightful to our professional learning? Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Audience Share Teacher observation Parent feedback Student growth Student independence Classroom mgmt. Student feedback Student engagement Daily work Student productions-produce the language Labs Questions students ask All students involved Student attitudes Attendance Providing a healthy environment Teacher knowledge of students Analyze the data (achievement and benchmark) Scaffolding information/differentiated instruction Passion of the teacher Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Audience Share Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. The Right Measures All measures should inform practice and lead to improvement for students. Multiple measures should clarify, not confuse. Multiple measures are not necessarily “better.” Less is more, sometimes. Important to measure what is important. Copyright, 2011. Battelle for Kids. Using the Measures Correctly Don’t just admire the data. Harness the power of data for improvement, not judgment. Convert data to information. Respond to the data. Don’t react. Copyright, 2011. Battelle for Kids. What is value-added analysis? Value-added models measure the influence of schools or teachers on the academic growth rates of students. Value-added analysis compares the change in achievement of a group of students from one year to the next, to an expected amount of change, based on their prior achievement history and other potential influences. Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Stair Step Expectations In a perfect world: Students start at the same place. Students progress at the same pace. Achievement test scores are enough to show growth. Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Differentiated Reality In reality: Students start at different places. Students progress at different rates. We need more than scores on a single test to show a school’s effectiveness. Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Why use value-added analysis? Using value-added analysis, along with other data allows us to separate… what we think is happening from what is actually happening. Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. What do you see? Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Take a second look. Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Harnessing the Power of Data for Improvement To do this we need: The right questions The right data The knowledge to interpret these data The wisdom to respond (not react) and apply strategies for school improvement Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Setting the Stage: The Power of Two Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. The Power of Two Achievement plus Growth Measures = A Clearer Picture of Student Outcomes Achievement Measures a student’s performance at a point in time on a single test in a single subject Compares to a standard (e.g., proficiency) Important to post-secondary opportunities (GPA, ACT) Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. The Power of Two Achievement plus Growth Measures= A Clearer Picture of Student Outcomes Growth Measures the student’s progress between two points in time Uses student’s own prior performance to predict future performance May factor in student background characteristics Uses multiple data points (including student demographics) that relate to student performance to increase precision Measures the effect a district, school, grade-level, classroom or teacher has on growth of student Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. The Power of Two: Achievement & Progress How do value-added measures support what we know about schools? One Year’s Growth High Progress High Progress Low Achievement High Achievement • School A Progress • School H Standard • School K • School G • School D Low Progress Low Achievement • School J • School E • School C • School F • School B Low Progress High Achievement Achievement Test Results Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. The Power of Two: Achievement & Progress Leading Progress One Year’s Growth High Progress High Progress Low Achievement High Achievement • School A • School H Standard • School K • School G • School D Low Progress Low Achievement • School J • School E • School C • School F • School B Low Progress High Achievement Achievement Test Results Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. The Power of Two: Achievement & Progress Learning Progress One Year’s Growth High Progress High Progress Low Achievement High Achievement • School A • School H Standard • School K • School G • School D Low Progress Low Achievement • School J • School E • School C • School F • School B Low Progress High Achievement Achievement Test Results Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. The Power of Two: Achievement & Progress Losing Ground Progress One Year’s Growth High Progress High Progress Low Achievement High Achievement • School A • School H Standard • School K • School G • School D Low Progress Low Achievement • School J • School E • School C • School F • School B Low Progress High Achievement Achievement Test Results Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. The Power of Two: Achievement & Progress Lucky Progress One Year’s Growth High Progress High Progress Low Achievement High Achievement • School A • School H Standard • School K • School G • School D Low Progress Low Achievement • School J • School E • School C • School F • School B Low Progress High Achievement Achievement Test Results Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Pause and Reflect Where do you think your school is? Where would you like to be? What strategies can you embrace now to get there? Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Although it appears that Gardener B was more effective in attaining a taller tree, it does not tell the whole story. The gardeners’ oak trees are 4 years old. We need to find the starting height for each tree in order to more fairly evaluate each gardener’s performance during the past year. Both trees were much shorter last year. Oak Tree A grew by 14 inches and Oak Tree B grew by 20 inches. 72 in. Gardener A Gardener B 61 in. 52 in. 47 in. Oak A Oak A Age 4 ThisAge is 3analogous (Today) (1 year ago) to a Oak B Oak B Age 4 Age 3 Growth Simple Model (Today) (1 year ago) Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. A Conceptual Analogy Achievement Model Simple Growth Model Value-Added Model Copyright, 2011. Battelle for Kids. We begin by understanding what attributed to the growth of the gardeners’ trees. For the past year, the gardeners have been tending to their oak trees, trying to maximize the height of the trees. Each gardener used a variety of strategies to help their own trees grow. After one year of implementing their strategies, one of Gardener A’s tree grew to 61 inches tall and one of Gardener B’s trees grew to 72 inches tall. 72 in. Gardener B Gardener A 61 in. This is analogous to an Achievement Model Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. We still do not know how much of this growth was due to the strategies used by each gardener. We need a more accurate estimate. We examine all oaks in each respective area to find the average height increase for these trees. We also take into consideration the impact of three environmental factors: Rainfall, Soil Richness, and Temperature. Gardener B Gardener A Low High Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Now it’s time to use our data to make a more accurate prediction for the expected of oak Based on data forheight all oak trees in thetrees region: in this area. The average increase in oak tree height was 20 inches during the past year. However, each tree was exposed to different levels of rainfall, temperature and soil richness. Therefore, we must adjust the average height during the past year to compensate for these environmental factors. 74 in. 72 in. Gardener B Gardener A 61 in. 59 in. 22 in. 12 in. +52 in. +47 in. +20 Average +20 Average + 3 for Rainfall - 5 for Rainfall - 3 for Soil + 2 for Soil - 8 for Temp _________ +12 inches During the year + 5 for Temp _________ +22 inches During the year Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Finally, we compare the actual height of each tree to our prediction. Our predicted heights for tree A and B are 59 and 74 inches respectively. Oak tree A’s actual height of 61 inches is 2 inches more than we predicted. We attribute this above-average result to the effect of Gardener A. Oak tree B’s actual height of 72 inches is 2 inches less than we predicted. We attribute this below-average result to the effect of Gardener B. 74 in. -2 72 in. Gardener A +2 Gardener B 61 in. 59 in. Predicted Predicted Actual Actual This is analogous to a Value-Added Model Oak A Oak B Oak A Oak B Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Apply this method to all trees under each gardener’s care. This information can be used to calculate the height for each tree today if it were being cared for by an average gardener in this area. Now, who is the more effective gardener? Gardener B Gardener A Predicted Oak A Actual Oak A Predicted Oak B Actual Oak B Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. How Does This Analogy Relate to Value-Added in the Education Context? Oak Tree Analogy Value-added in Education What are we looking at? • Gardeners • • • • • What are we using to measure success? • Relative height improvement in inches • Relative improvement on standardized test scores Sample • Single oak tree • Groups of students Control factors • Rainfall • Soil richness • Temperature • Students’ prior test performance (usually most significant predictor) • Other demographic Districts Schools Grade levels Classrooms Programs and Interventions characteristics (grade level, gender, SWD, ELL status, IEP status, Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Reflection Why is it important to measure both achievement and progress? What are the challenges of identifying our most effective practices through a single lens of an achievement measure? How may the use of value added measures inform our efforts to identify and replicate our most effective practices? Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. The Value-Added Research Center (VARC) Model School Level Results Teacher Level Results Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Value-Added Color Scheme on Reports Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Which grade-level team should be prioritized? Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Value-Added Analysis: Actual minus Predicted Value-Added Above Prediction Value-Added At Prediction Value-Added Below Predicted Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Prior Data Points Used to Predict: Using the data from the Oklahoma Core Curriculum Test (OCCT), in reading and math… A prior reading achievement level can be predictive of reading achievement. e.g., 7th grade reading predicts 8th grade reading A prior math achievement level can be predictive of math achievement. It is also possible that a prior reading test can predict math and vice versa. Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Culture Matters For many of us, examining data can be very personal. The school value-added report may be the first time we look into the mirror and reflect upon the impact of our practices. A supportive and collaborative culture fosters using the data to improve our practices in a positive and productive manner. Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Closing Questions Think about your school’s culture. How would we assess our readiness to collaborate around our data for the purposes of improved practice? What are some ways that we can nurture a positive school culture for using value-added data to improve practice? Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. Check for Understanding Please complete the 3–2–1 Exit Ticket before leaving today. 3 Ways value-added data can improve your school and/or classroom. 2 Things you would like to further explore. 1 Takeaway you gleaned from this presentation. Copyright, 2012. Battelle for Kids. www.BattelleforKids.org http://twitter.com/BattelleforKids