Using Social Change Communication to Promote Child

advertisement

African leadership for child survival

16-18 January 2013

Addis Adeba

Ethiopie

Rocio BERZAL

C4D Specialist Niger

1

Promoting social and behaviour change for Child survival

Setting the basis - (from 2006 to mid-2008)

• Research LANCET, pilot design, secure resources (HR and financial)

• Identify & develop coordination mechanisms (national and local)

1.

Social & Behaviour change communication

• IPC / community workers + participatory communication for individual change

(proximity and traditional media, cinema, theatre, community radios…)

• Community empowerment / participation for collective change (community learning, community-led design, implementation and M&E of action plans)

2.

Social Mobilization

• Creation of partnership and networks (trad. chiefs, women, youth)

• Media campaigns

3.

Advocacy

• Local (imams, traditional chiefs) and national levels (partners)

Community empowerment

From Collective learning…

Introduce approach, build trust

…To Collective action:

Participatory community assessment

Village plan of action

Meetings to discuss the progress

Annual celebration of champions

Community advocates

Community assesment

Promotion KFP

ACTION

Scaling up: communities, agents of change

ANALYSIS

• Celebration of progress

• Certification «communauté Modèle»

SITAN

DIFFUSION

CONTACT

• Amplication horizontale et verticale

PLAN

PLAN

Community plan of action

DIFFUSION

ACTION

Community self- diagnosis

SITAN

ANALYSIS

CONTACT

Identify acteurs

Establish trust relationships

Using stimulus guiding dialogue

• Facilitators/ volunteers

• Supervisors (NGO)

• Step 1

• Identification of problem

Step 7

Sharing responsabilitie s (relais, village chief and religious

• Step 2

• Involving leaders and participants

Catalyseurs

• Traditional Mass media/ actors of change

• Community Dialogue

• Step 3

• Clarification perceptions

Training

• Etape 4

• Expression of individuals and collectifs needs

(census/ cartographie)

• Modern Mass media

Step 5

• Evaluation current situation

• Vision

• Establish’ objectifs

• Reaching consensus about activities

Step 6

Analyse and action plan

Step 8

Social

Mobilisation

• Collective action

Step 9

Implementatio n activities

Step 10

Community based monitoring system

Step 11

Participatory assessment

Step 12

Recognition of model families and villages

Changements individuels

• Individual Changes

Social Influence, personal advocacy

• Competencies

• Ideation : Knowledge, Self-

Confidence, Risk Perception, subjective Norms, self Image,

Emotions, Self-efficiency,

• Intentions

• Behavior

• Social Changes

• Leadership

• Level and equity of participation

• Information equity

Societal impact

• Collective Selfefficiency

• Ownership

• Social Cohesion

• Social norms

Analyse data on KFP and community interaction with health system

Community-based monitoring form allows gathering data on KFP adoption and sharing /discussing indicators with health workers at village level.

The purpose of the village action plan is outline different actions to help the practices adoption.

A problem of supply/resource issues could be outlined in the action plan to stress this issue and find solutions, included advocacy actions.

Monitoring tool.pptx

SCALING UP

FROM 140,000 TO 2 MILLION FAMILIES

Communes

5

Total pop.

140,331

Children 0-5

28,766

Scaling up in 5 regions with 6 NGOs (from mid-2009)

Communes

30

Total pop.

1,076,159

Children 0-5

183,859

Scaling up through other programme entry doors (from mid 2011)

WASH, EDUCATION, CASH TRANSFER

Communes

15 (WASH/HEALTH)

8 (CASH TRANSFER)

4 (EDUCATION)

Total pop.

600,000

280,000

120,000

Children 0-5

120,000

56,000

24,000

Results accelerated in individual

& social change

(INS Survey and LASDEL study in 2012)

• Individual behaviour changes are supported and accelerated

Practices

Early breastfeeding initiation (within 1 hour after delivery)

Exclusive breastfeeding

Vitamine A (one dose received in the past months)

Women hand washing with soap

Mothers using ORS treatment

Intervention zones

88.7%

77.4%

86.8%

78.9%

58.3%

Control zones

76.5%

53.7%

79.1%

76.2%

29.1%

• Social change: increased participation, sense of ownership, change of social norms (EBF, assisted delivery..), the community enters in a dynamic of change (various initiatives related to hygiene, education..)

Empirical evidences

Public sanitation days

Building of public garbage bins

“Social cohesion”: The village had created a

“food bank,” solidarity system organized to invest in nutrition activities

Young leaders

Organization of transportation of pregnant women to the health centers

Husbands more supportive of health facility attendance

The “community cart” gives community members access to health services

Model leaders

You can see the change by looking at the health of our children. I think I can convince the others. When women saw my baby recently they all commented on how healthy my baby looked”.

KFP

A

mbassadors

Local media trained in KFP becomes spokespersons and organizes public broadcasts with population

Volunteers create demand for products and health services among the population

Volunteers generate knowledge and information about care-seeking and monitor behaviours

Volunteers assist the health staff of the health center by holding communication sessions for patients

Approaches for scaling up in 2013: consolidating gains and increasing impact

Increasing alliances to scale –up coverage focused on ICCM, nutrition and social safety nets:

• MDG Initiative at level of 8 health districts supported by EU

• Modelling a community-based nutrition program to reduce and prevent chronic malnutrition

• Safety nets: Cash transfer + KFP in 1,000 villages

• Alliance with WFP in 1200 CRENAMs and 29 Health Districts

• Alliance with UNFPA, Mens involvement initiative « Schools for husbands » in 1 region

Evidence: Almost 60,000 children’s lives saved in 2009!

Proportion of child lives saved in 2009, by intervention or risk factor reduction (List JHU team)

Careseeking for malaria

9%

Vit A supp.

9%

Careseeking for pneumonia

8%

ORS + Zinc

5%

Reduction in nutrition

19% Measles vaccine

5%

19% lives saved

Others

(<2% each)

11%

ITN ownership

25%

Hib vaccine

4%

Changes in BF practices 3%

TT in preg 2%

Bibliography

• LANCET series 2003, 2004

• Proposal for Spanish Government : Fomentar la incorporacion de practicas familiares a fin de promover la supervivencia del niño en Niger, Unicef Niger, 2008

• KAP study on KFP, KONE Mariatou, Niger, juillet 2008

• EDSN MICS III 2006, EDSN MICS IV 2012. INS NIGER

• Narrative of an Action Research project in Communication for Social and Behavior

Change, in five municipalities of Maradi and Zinder, Niger. Manuela Varrasso

• Enquête quantitative sur les Pratiques Familiales Essentiels. INS, Niger. Avril 2012.

• La promotion des Pratiques Familiales Essentiels au Niger, LASDEL-Avril 2012.

• Figueroa M.E., Lawrence Kincaid D., Rani M., Lewis G., Communication for Social

Change: An Integrated Model for Measuring the Process and Its Outcomes,

Communication for Social Change Working Paper Series I, The Rockefeller Foundation and Johns Hopkins University Center for Communication Programs, New York, 2002

• LANCET. Reduction in child mortality in Niger: a Countdown to 2015 country case study

Agbessi Amouzou, Oumarou Habi, Khaled Bensaïd, and the Niger Countdown Case

Study Working Group

• Qualitative research to identify solutions to local barriers to care-seeking and treatment for diarrhoea , malaria and pneumonia in Niger. Juliet Bedford, 2012

• Review/analysis of UNICEF Community-Led Total Sanitation and Essential Family

Practices Communication for Development Interventions in Niger. Karen Greiner 2012

22

Many thanks

Download