Corridor Advisory Committee Meeting #3 February 8, 2016 2 Parking Along the Corridors Presentation Organization I. Review of parking by corridor II. Current City Requirements III. Parking requirements comparison IV. MTC TOP 10 list V. How does the City of Santa Cruz manage parking now? VI. Phased implementation VII. Parking Benefits District toolbox VIII. Discussion What is Parking Demand for the Community? Thou shall not remove the parking in front of my door, I (parking) demand that space! 4 Rule #1: Think differently about parking Promote access Promote infill and mixed use development Promote alternative use of transportation Redevelop and reignite commercial activity Develop transit incentive programs Wide range of development Promote car sharing Utilize land optimally Promote transit oriented development Reduce existing blacktop Promote healthy living through walking and bicycling Cleaner stormwater Connected streets Implement TDM programs 5 6 Ocean Street by Zone 7 Water Street by Zone 8 Mission Street by Zone 9 Soquel Avenue by Zone 11 City Requirement Ratio Comparison Land Use (Per Unit) Santa Cruz Sunnyvale Santa Clara Fremont Milpitas Mountain View Medical Office (KSF) 5 5 3.33 5 4.44 6.6 Financial Institutions (KSF) 2.5+1.5 per teller machine 5.55 3.33 5.55 5.55 3.33 Office (KSF) 3.33 4.44 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 Industrial/Service (KSF) 2.5 2 0.66 1.6 0.66 4 Retail/Shopping Center (KSF) 4 5.55 5 4 5 4 Lodging (Room) 1 + 2 for managers 1+1 per employee 1 1 1 1+1 per employee Sit Down Restaurant (KSF) 8.33 13.3 15.1 14.5 16.8 18 Studio 1 Bed Unit 2 Bed Unit 3 Bed Unit 0.75 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.8 2.33 2.5 N/A 1.5 1.5 2.5 2.5 1.2 1.8 2.4 2.4 1.725 1.725 2.3 2.3 12 City Comparisons: Parking Spaces Required and Demand City/Area Beaverton, OR Bend, OR Chico, CA Corvallis, OR Hillsboro, OR Hood River, Or Kirkland, WA Monterey, CA Oxnard, CA Palo Alto, CA Redmond, WA Sacramento, CA Salem, OR San Antonio Precise Plan, Mountain View CA Santa Monica, CA Seattle WA Ventura, CA, (West) Minimum Requirement / 1,000 SF or Actual Occupied / Built Supply Actual Demand / 1,000 SF % Difference 4.15 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 1.54 2.50 2.14 1.70 2.50 4.10 2.00 3.15 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.6 1.2 2.0 1.2 1.0 1.9 2.7 1.6 2.0 55% 40% 43% 25% 45% 20% 21% 44% 42% 24% 34% 20% 35% 3.73 1.5 60% 2.80 2.50 2.87 1.8 1.8 1.3 36% 30% 56% 13 How does the City Manage Parking Now? Each site parked individually ITE/ULI shared parking allowed- with restrictions Minimum residential requirements Little flexibility in use and sharing parking Free on street parking Parking often drives use Reductions are available through limited TDM programs Can TDM be expanded? 14 Current Parking Reductions Reductions are currently missing the mark Reductions Bike Reduction- 10% Cooperative Parking- 10% Non-Auto Programs- 10% Reduction Small Units Reduction- varies Off-site Provisions Time Distance 18 Rule #2: Think Change Change in land use Change in connectivity Change in economic well-being Many case studies to show the success of areas after implementation: Change in parking Change in zoning requirements and management Pasadena Santa Barbara Santa Cruz Downtown Side Ave Some parking availability On-street parking spaces City Parking Lot Right size parking ¼ Mile walking distance Some parking availability On-street parking spaces Right size parking Corridor Ave No parking availability Private Parking Lot Large lot with extra private parking No parking availability 20 Metropolitan Transportation Commission of the Bay Area Ten Point Plan Reduce or eliminate unnecessary parking requirements Share parking Price on-street and off-street parking Adopt and on street availability target Manage parking availability through Promote alternative modes pricing and time limits Establish parking maximums Prevent spillover into the Adopt strategies for parking management neighborhoods Establish Parking Benefit Districts 21 What is a Parking Benefit District? Designated area for managing public and private parking in a localized geographic “neighborhood” where the parking need is more that 100 spaces. 22 Shared Parking Mixed use development Peak demands vary by use type Eliminate excessive pavement Private – Private agreements Lot size constraints Private – Public agreements Optimize use of parking On-street parking is shared by default Address spillover into neighborhoods Transition plan for on-street parking Use TMA to manage and broker 2 hour limits on the neighborhood streets for sharing during the daytime? 23 Parking Pricing Price all parking No free parking Start with on-street pay meters Manage pricing to manage demand 24 Neighborhood Parking Permits in residential neighborhoods for night time parking 2 hour time limit during day or with permit Street parking is for everyone 25 Unbundle parking Give the option to unbundle parking, BUT Where will people park if parking is unbundled? Manage it well 26 Parking Credits Large Lots Too much parking provided (exceed maximum) Share it, and get a credit …..or pay a penalty 27 Parking surplus opportunities City and or private developer purchase or lease land for parking supply Expand the programs of the PBD 28 What is a Transportation Management Agency? Parking and Travel Demand Management Strategies are dependent on a Management Structure and body/bodies to plan, fund and implement these strategies. Transportation Management Agencies (TMAs) are non-profit, member controlled organizations that provide transportation services for a particular area or facility. They are generally public-private partnerships consisting of employers with local government support. 29 Benefits of TMA’s provide Commute trip reduction programs Congestion reduction Commute financial incentives Efficient use of parking facilities Flextime support Transportation mode choice Guaranteed ride home services Reduce GHG Marketing and promotion Improved safety and capacity of roadways Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning Shared parking coordination Equity benefits – mobility choices, pay for what you use Monitoring 30 Phasing Plan: Phase 1 Use blended rates with more flexibility for multiple uses Promote collaboration between land owners for shared parking, combining sites for development, shared driveways, shared bike facilities 31 ULI, ITE and City of Santa Cruz Parking Land Use Category Metric ULI ITE Santa Cruz Residential Unit or KSF? 0.20 – 1.50 1.33 – 2.17 ? Office & General Work Space KSF 0.50 – 3.0 0.86 – 5.58 ? General Commercial KSF 4.0 – 4.5 1.33 – 5.58 ? Restaurant KSF 5 – 25 4.20 – 24.30 ? Hotel Guest Room 0.20 – 1.50 0.61 – 1.94 ? 32 Phasing Plan: Phase 2 Establish the Parking Benefit District Implement Tools 33 Phasing Plan: Parking Benefit Toolbox Implementation Phase 2 1. Establish a Parking Benefit District and TMA 2. All public parking has to be fee based 3. Allow a shortfall of parking on private lots, but provide the additional required spaces on public or other private lots 4. Establish public or quasi public lots at ¼ mile distances 5. Set minimums and maximums for parking provision 6. Group land uses in calculating parking requirements 7. Share parking 8. Unbundle parking as an option 9. Implement permit parking in the neighborhoods 34 Phasing Plan: Phase 2 ( continued) 10. Promote consolidation of lots 11. Promote public-private and private-private agreements 12. Require no on-site parking for smaller lots (2-4 spaces) 13. Require bigger lot developments to provide excess parking for credits 14. Implement TDM measures 15. Provide a management body (e.g. TMA) for implementation 16. Develop short term, medium, and long term development plans – note that this will change, but it paints the picture of what is required 17. Update the parking regulations to accommodate this approach to parking supply along the corridors 35 Phase 3 Obtain and improve shared parking facilities Use PBD funds or multi-modal improvements Monitor parking occupancy and pricing Monitor TDM Implementation Requirements Plan for future parking needs and management