Achieving Diversity in the Legal Profession through the Educational Pipeline Prepared by the ABA Council For Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the Educational Pipeline Overview • The diversity pipeline: What is it? Why is it important? • Leaks and blockages along the pipeline • The numbers: Early education data Law school demographics Law school admission shut-out rates Bar passage rates American Bar Association Pipeline Council 2 Overview (continued) • Impact of the numbers on The legal profession The judiciary • Interventions – what works • What YOU can do • Resources American Bar Association Pipeline Council 3 What Is the Educational Pipeline? • The educational route to the legal profession for students • Encompasses early education (Pre-K to 12), • College (2-year and 4-year), and law school (including the bar exam) American Bar Association Pipeline Council 4 Why Is It Important? • A robust, diverse educational pipeline ensures continued diversity in the profession and judiciary • Visible diversity in the legal profession and judiciary supports the public’s trust and confidence and enhances perceptions of fairness in the legal system • The pipeline is the pathway to success in the profession American Bar Association Pipeline Council 5 Why Is It Important? (continued) • Lawyers occupy critical leadership positions and engage in policymaking impacting our communities • Lawyers account for: 100% Judges 50% U.S. Presidents 58% U.S. Senators 37% U.S. Representatives 40% Governors 11% Major CEO’s American Bar Association Pipeline Council (Data current as of 2012) 6 Why Is It Important? (continued) • The educational pipeline is the pathway to a successful career in the law • A law degree and legal experience open doors and create opportunities unlike many other professional credentials: “Always make the choice that brings you more choices” – choosing the legal profession leads to better options American Bar Association Pipeline Council 7 Critical Leaks Along the Pipeline • • • • Achievement gap Dropout and expulsion rates in early years Community college pipeline Disparities in law school admissions and academic support programs • Law school admission shut-out rate • Bar passage rates American Bar Association Pipeline Council 8 The Achievement Gap • The disparity in academic performance between groups of students • Achievement gap shows up in grades, standardized test scores, course selection, dropout rates, and college completion rates, among other success measures Source: Education Week http://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/achievement-gap American Bar Association Pipeline Council 9 The Achievement Gap (continued) • The promise of a quality education is an important civil and human right that has yet to be fully realized in the American public education system (see NAACP Fact Sheet- African Americans and Education). • We need to focus on the documented gaps in educational opportunity and achievement that separate low income students and students of color from others Source The Education Trust, http://www.edtrust.org/sites/edtrust.org/files/USA_0_0.pdf American Bar Association Pipeline Council 10 Achievement Gap (continued) Source: The Education Trust hhttp://www.edtrust.org/sites/edtrust.org/files/USA_0_0pdf 4th Grade Proficiency 2007 National Assessment 8th Grade Proficiency 2007 National Assessment High School Graduation Rates Public College Graduation Rates African American 14% 11% 59% 41% Asian 44% 49% 90% 64% Latino 17% 15% 61% 46% Native American 20% 17% 62% 38% White 41% 41% 91% 57% Group American Bar Association Pipeline Council 11 The Achievement Gap (continued) • In 2006–07, approximately 16 percent of all elementary and secondary public school students (or 7.7 million students) attended high-poverty schools including: Group % Attending High Poverty Schools African American 33% Latino 35% American Indian/ Alaska Native 25% Asian Pacific Islander 13% White 4% See US DOE, National Center for Education Statistics, http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp American Bar Association Pipeline Council 12 Achievement Gap (continued) • Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Students in High-Poverty Schools by Race/Ethnicity and Locale: School Year 2006–07 Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data, Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe Survey, 2006–07, American Bar Association Pipeline Council 13 The Achievement Gap (continued) • Data show that low-income students and students of color achieve at high levels when schools and school systems are organized to support student success Source: The Education Trust, Education Watch (April 2009) • Investment in early childhood development for disadvantaged children provides a high return to society through increased personal achievement and social productivity Source: www.heckmanequation.org American Bar Association Pipeline Council 14 Drop-Out Rates • Nationwide, 7,000 students drop out of school every day; only about 70 percent of students graduate from high school with a high school diploma. See U.S.DOE, ttp://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp • Two thousand high schools in the United States produce more than half of all dropouts. A recent study suggests that in the 50 largest cities, only 53 percent of students graduate on time. • Research shows that children of color attend “dropout factories” at significantly higher rates. See Comm. on Educ. and Labor, http://www.edlabor.house.gov/.../o5/high-school-dropoutcrisis-thr.shtml American Bar Association Pipeline Council 15 Drop-Out Rates (continued) 16 to 24 year olds by Race/Ethnicity Source: US DOE National Center for Education Statistics, Condition of Education, Indoator 20,NCES2009-081 Year Total- includes groups not White Latino shown separately 2000 10.9 6.9 27.8 2001 10.7 7.3 27.0 2002 10.5 6.5 25.7 2003 9.9 6.3 23.5 2004 10.3 6.8 23.8 2005 9.4 6.0 22.4 2006 9.3 5.8 22.1 2007 8.7 5.3 21.4 American Bar Association Pipeline Council 16 School to Prison Pipeline (STTP) What is the “School to Prison Pipeline”? Policies and practices pushing school children, in particular minority and low income students, out of the classroom and into the juvenile and criminal justice system See What is the School to Prison Pipeline? ACLU at http://www./ac;ui/prg/raciial-justice/what-school-prison-pipeline American Bar Association Pipeline Council 17 School to Prison Pipeline (continued) Factors Accounting for the STPP: • Inadequate resources in public schools • Zero-tolerance and other school discipline (increase in school suspensions from 1.7M in 1974 to 3.1M in 2000) • Increased reliance on police • Disciplinary alternative schools • Juvenile detention facilities • Barriers to re-entry into traditional schools American Bar Association Pipeline Council 18 School to Prison Pipeline (continued) Models for addressing the STPP: • School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBS) See http://www.dignityinschools.org/print/247 • Restorative Justice Practices See http://www.ousd.k12.ca.us/restorativejustice American Bar Association Pipeline Council 19 School to Prison Pipeline (continued) Proposed Federal Legislation to address STPP: • Annual reporting of disciplinary indicators • Mandatory technical assistance with disparate rates of exclusionary discipline • Federal funds to develop inclusive approaches to school discipline See Dismantling the School to Prison Pipeline, NAACP Legal Defense Fund (LDF) See LDF Testimony 12/10/12, US Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights http://www.naacpldf.org/case/school-prison-pipeline American Bar Association Pipeline Council 20 College Enrollments • Race and family income are highly correlated with whether a student immediately enrolls in college. • The immediate college enrollment rates of high school graduates from low and middle-income families trailed those of their peers from highincome families by more than 10 percentage points in each year between 1972 and 2007. Source: US DOE “The Condition of Education 2009” American Bar Association Pipeline Council 21 College Enrollments (continued) • In 2007, the enrollment rate gap between students from low and high-income families was 23 percentage points and the gap between students from middle and high-income families was 15 percentage points. • In 2007, the immediate college enrollment rate was 70 percent for white high school graduates and 61 percent for Latino high school graduates, compared with 56 percent for African American high school graduates. Source: US DOE, “The Condition of Education 2009” American Bar Association Pipeline Council 22 Law School Applicants: Interest In Law As Freshmen by Race/Ethnicity and Gender Source: LSAC 2013, Behind the Data, Freshman Survey American Bar Association Pipeline Council 23 2006 College Graduation Rates Source: The Education Trust, Education Watch National Report, April 2009 Group Graduation Rate African American Asian/Pacific Islander Latino American Indian/ Alaska Native Whites 41% 64% 46% 38% 57% American Bar Association Pipeline Council 24 Community College Pipeline • Two-year institutions are becoming more popular starting points for law school applicants • Students who begin undergraduate education at two-year colleges perform comparably to those who begin at four-year institutions in both law school admission success and first- year law school performance See LSAC Report: “From Two-Year Institutions to Law School” American Bar Association Pipeline Council 25 Community College Pipeline (continued) Community colleges have historically enrolled approximately half of all undergraduate students of color. Who is attending? • 7.7 million students enrolled • Average age: 28 years old • Whites: 54% • Hispanic: 16% • Black: 14% • Asian/Pacific Islander: 6% • Other/Unknown: 11% Source: Graphic Sociology at http://thesocietypages.org/graphicsociology/2012/07/23/demographics-of-communitycolleges-in-america/ American Bar Association Pipeline Council 26 Community College Pipeline (continued) Community colleges are an important access point for low-income and poorer students: • Between 1989-1990 and 2009-2010 community college graduations increased at a greater pace than initial enrollments • During the 2007-2008 period, community colleges enrolled 1.7M or 41% of all undergraduate students living in poverty • During 2007-2008 one in five community college students lived in poverty See Why Access Matters: The Community College Student Body at http://www.aacc.nche.edu/Publications/Briefs/Documents/PB_AccessMatters.pdf American Bar Association Pipeline Council 27 Community College Pipeline (continued) • Increasing law school recruitment efforts at twoyear colleges may positively impact the diversity of future applicant pools • More law school applicants, especially Hispanic/Latino applicants, are beginning their undergraduate education at more racially diverse two-year institutions • Given increased intuition, population shifts, and the current economic climate, trend is likely to continue See LSAC Report: “From Two-year Institutions to Law School” American Bar Association Pipeline Council 28 Issues Impacting Law School Disparities • • • • • • • • Admissions practices Shut-out rates Law school rankings Law school enrollment, tuition, debt Financial support (needs vs. merit based) Academic support and bar preparation programs Stereotype threat/Implicit bias Working within affirmative action limitations American Bar Association Pipeline Council 29 Admissions Practices Law school admissions criteria track key factors accounting for US News Rankings: LSAT GPA •No consideration is given to factors that account for the successful practice of law as outlined in studies by Marjorie Shultz and Sheldon Zedeck (Shultz & Zedeck, Identification, Development and Validation of Predictors for Successful Lawyering, 2009) American Bar Association Pipeline Council 30 Admissions Practices (continued) Shultz & Zedeck Factors: • Shultz & Zedeck identified 26 factors for effective lawyers and testing tools that supplement the LSAT • Testing tools are race neutral American Bar Association Pipeline Council 31 Shultz & Zedeck Factors (continued) • • • • • • • • • Analysis and Reasoning Creativity/Innovation Problem Solving Practical Judgment Providing Advice & Counsel and Building Relationships with Clients Fact Finding Researching the Law Speaking Writing American Bar Association Pipeline Council 32 Shultz & Zedeck Factors (continued) • • • • • • • Listening Influencing & Advocating Questioning & Interviewing Negotiation Skills Strategic Planning Organizing and Managing (Own) Work Organizing and Managing Others (Staff/Colleagues) • Evaluation, Development, and Mentoring • Developing Relationships in Legal Profession American Bar Association Pipeline Council 33 Shultz & Zedeck Factors (continued) • • • • • • • • Networking and Business Development Community Involvement and Service Integrity & Honesty Stress Management Passion & Engagement Diligence Self-Development Able to See the World Through the Eyes of Others American Bar Association Pipeline Council 34 Law School Demographics (See ABA/LSAC Guidebook) Group 2011 Census 2010 American Indian/Alaska Native .8% 0.9% Asian 7.1% 4.8% Black/African American 7.1% 12.6% Caucasian/White 75.5% 56.1% Hispanic/Latino 7.5% 16.3% Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander .3% 0.2% Two or More Races/Ethnicities 1.7% 2.9% NOTE: 2010 Census figures do not reflect 6.2% Other ... American Bar Association Pipeline Council 35 Law School Demographics (continued) (See LSAC Data re: Matriculants) Group Fall 2010 Fall 2011 American Indian/Alaska Native 0.4% 0.4% Asian 7.1% 7.7% Black/African American 7.2% 7.2% Caucasian/White 65.9% 60.5% Hispanic/Latino 6.1% 5.9% Puerto Rican 1.6% 1.8% Two or More Races/Ethnicities 3.8% 5.5% American Bar Association Pipeline Council 36 Law School Shut-Out Rates The numbers of student applicants who are not accepted at ANY law school Source: LSACNet.org, (See Data Volume Summaries by Ethnic and Gender Group and LSAT Technical Report 08-03). Includes all ABA-accredited schools. Applicant Group Total Applicants Mean LSAT Score Total Admitted Shut-Out Rate African American 95,870 142 38,240 60% Asian/Pacific islander 71,240 152 44,710 37% Hispanic/ Latino 73,880 145 39,490 47% Native American 6,960 148 4,060 42% Caucasian 571,300 153 392,630 31% American Bar Association Pipeline Council 37 Law School Rankings • US News & World Report Law School Rankings influence admissions policies • Rankings do not include diversity metrics • Rankings do not include factors accounting for successful practice of law (e.g. Shultz & Zedeck Factors for Effective Lawyering) American Bar Association Pipeline Council 38 Law School Rankings Methodology See http://www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/top-lawschools/articles/2013/03/11/methodology-best-law-schools-rankings Quality Assessment (40%): • Peer Assessment (0.25) • Assessment by lawyers/judges (.15) Selectivity (25%): • Median LSAT Score (.125) • Median undergrad GPA (.10) • Acceptance rate (.025) American Bar Association Pipeline Council 39 Law School Rankings Methodology (continued) Placement success (20%) • Employment rates (.04 at graduation and .14 at 9 mos. after) • Bar Passage (.02) Faculty Resources (15%): • Expenditures per student: Support services (.0975) Financial Aid (.015) • Student/faculty ratio (.03) • Library resources (.0075) American Bar Association Pipeline Council 40 US News Law School Diversity Index See http://www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/top-lawschools/articles/2013/03/11/methodology-law-school-diversity-index • To identify law schools where students are most likely to encounter classmates from a different race or ethnic group, US News has created a separate index based on total proportion of full and part time minority JD students (not including international students) and the mix of racial and ethnic groups on campus during the particular academic year • The Index ranges from 0.0 to 1.0 with 1.0 being a more diverse student population • Schools enrolling a large population of students from any one ethnic group won’t receive a high diversity index number, given the low likelihood that a student at that school will encounter students from different ethnic groups other than their own American Bar Association Pipeline Council 41 Law School Enrollment, Tuition, Debt • Applications dropped to 54,000 annually • First Year enrollment down to under 40,000 from 50,000 in 2010 • Average tuition has risen to $40,000/year from $23,000 in 2001 • Average debt per graduate risen to $125,000 in 2011 from $70,000 in 2001 • Jobs are scarce—especially for graduates from lower tiered schools See “The Lawyer Bubble” by Stephen J. Harper American Bar Association Pipeline Council 42 Financial Support • Law schools compete for admission of top students to improve law school rankings • Emphasis on merit-based scholarships to attract high-performing students (instead of needs-based scholarships to attract low income, underrepresented and diverse students) American Bar Association Pipeline Council 43 Academic Support and Bar Preparation Programs • Academic support has been a critical factor in increasing the performance of students from low socio-economic and diverse backgrounds • Many academic support programs have extended services to the entire student body to increase bar passage rates for accreditation and ranking purposes. This has often resulted in the dilution of services to students from low socio-economic and diverse backgrounds. American Bar Association Pipeline Council 44 Stereotype Threat/Implicit Bias • Understanding and addressing concepts of Stereotype Threat and Implicit Bias are critical to positive support, confidence and performance of diverse students throughout law school and bar exam preparation American Bar Association Pipeline Council 45 Stereotype Threat/Implicit Bias (continued) • Stereotype threat: negative expectations communicated to students (in particular minority/low income students) resulting in low performance See additional resources at http://reducingstereotypethreat.org/definition.html American Bar Association Pipeline Council 46 Stereotype Threat/Implicit Bias (continued) • Implicit biases are those that we carry without awareness or conscious direction. These biases are learned unconsciously through exposure to social stereotypes and attitudes. • Performance, or the perception of performance, is also impacted by the unconscious mental processes found in the minds of those with whom we interact American Bar Association Pipeline Council 47 Stereotype Threat/Implicit Bias (continued) • Implicit bias impacts classroom environment, curriculum, and ultimate performance of students See http://www.equaljusticesociety.org/law/implicitbias/ • Implicit Association Tests developed at Harvard, University of Virginia and University of Washington to measure unconscious bias. For Implicit Association Test (IAT) see https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/ American Bar Association Pipeline Council 48 Affirmative Action Limitations • State Propositions: • California: Proposition 209 http://law.onecle.com/california/constitution/article_1/31.html • Michigan: Proposal 2 http://www.civilrights.org/equalopportunity/michigan/proposal_text.html • Washington: Initiative 200 http://www.secstate.wa.gov/elections/initiatives/text/i200.pdf • Fisher v. Texas For SCOTUS decision see http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-345_l5gm.pdf For commentary pending SCOTUS decision see: http://www.lawyerscommittee.org/projects/educatoin/page?id=0003 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher_v._University_of_Texas American Bar Association Pipeline Council 49 2012 Bar Passage Data See National Committee of Bar Examiners http://www.ncbex.org/assets/media_files/BarExaminer/articles/2013/8201132012statistics.pdf 2012 TOTALS Total Minorities Passing Source: ABA Committee of Bar Examiners Taking Exam 82,920 55,253 % of Total Passing 67% Note: ABA and National Committee of Bar Examiners do not collect disaggregated demographic info for bar passage For an example of detailed demographic data see The State Bar of California site at: http://admissions.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/4/documents/gbx/JULY2012STATS.1 22112_R.pdf American Bar Association Pipeline Council 50 Impact of the Pipeline on the Legal Profession Source: ABA Lawyer Demographics Group Lawyer Data % (Source: ABA) Population Data (2010 Census) White Asian 88.1% 3.4% 56.1% 4.8% Black Hispanic Pacific Islander 4.8% 3.7% 12.6% 16.3% 0.2% Native American Other Minorities Two or More Races Need disaggregated data for API lawyers No data No data No data American Bar Association Pipeline Council 0.9% 6.2% 2.9% 51 Impact of the Pipeline on the Judiciary Source: ABA Standing Committee on Judicial Independence Group White Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic Native American Other Minorities Totals Judicial Demographics 87.8% 1.3% Longevity6.5% 3.5% .11% .77% 100% American Bar Association Pipeline Council Population 2010 Census 56.1% 5.0% 12.6% 16.3% 0.9% 9.1% 100% 52 Interventions – WHAT WORKS • Educational rigor, teaching critical thinking skills • Instilling student confidence • Setting goals • Exposure to role models • Longevity/continuity/stability of programs • Long-term investment, not short-term fixes • Data collection, program metrics American Bar Association Pipeline Council 53 What YOU Can Do Attorney participation in pipeline programs: • Mentoring • Role models • Speaker bureaus • Internships • Field trips • Mock trial programs • Law-themed schools American Bar Association Pipeline Council 54 What YOU Can Do Attorney support for pipeline programs: • Student scholarships for LSAT and bar prep courses • Support for law-themed school students: clothing for interviews and internships • Support for law-themed schools: supplies, trips, events American Bar Association Pipeline Council 55 Model ABA Programs • Judicial Clerkship Program http://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity/diversity_pipeline/ projects_initiatives/judicial_clerkship_program.html • Legal Opportunity Scholarship http://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity/diversity_pipeline/ projects_initiatives/legal_opportunity_scholarship.html • Judicial Intern Opportunity Program (JIOP) http://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/initiatives/good_ works/judicial_intern_opportunity_program.html American Bar Association Pipeline Council 56 Model School Programs • Legal Outreach http://legaloutreach.org/?page_id=2 • Thurgood Marshall http://www.thurgoodmarshallacademy.org/ • The Ronald H. Brown Center Prep Program for College Students http://www.stjohns.edu/academics/graduate/law/academics/center s/ronbrown/prepprogram • Thomas M. Cooley Law School http://www.cooley.edu/ • UCLA Law Fellows http://www.law.ucla.edu/current-students/getinvolved/outreach%20program/Pages/default.aspx American Bar Association Pipeline Council 57 Model School Programs (continued) • Marshall Brennan Constitutional Literacy http://www.wcl.american.edu/marshallbrennan • Street Law, Inc. http://www.streetlaw.org/en/home • Just the Beginning Foundation http://www.jtbf.org/ • For People of Color, Inc. http://forpeopleofcolor.org/ American Bar Association Pipeline Council 58 Model State and Local Bar Pipeline Programs • Bar Association of San Francisco (BASF) http://www.sfbar.org/diversity/index.aspx • The State Bar of California: California Law Academy Strategic Task Force (CLAS) – California Partnership Programs http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/gs/hs/cpagen.asp American Bar Association Pipeline Council 59 ABA Resources • ABA Council for Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the Educational Pipeline http://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity/diversity_pipeline.html • ABA Center for Racial and Ethnic Diversity http://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity.html • ABA Diversity Portals http://www.americanbar.org/portals/diversity.html American Bar Association Pipeline Council 60 ABA Resources (continued) • ABA Standing Committee on Judicial Independence http://www.americanbar.org/groups/justice_center/judicial_independence.ht ml • ABA Lawyer Demographics http://www.americanbar.org/resources_for_lawyers/profession_statistics.html • ABA Pipeline Diversity Directory http://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity/diversity_pipeline/reso urces/pipeline_diversity_directory.html American Bar Association Pipeline Council 61 Other Resources • Law School Admissions Council (LSAC) http://www.lsac.org/jd/diversity/minorities-in-legal-education.asp • Discover Law http://discoverlaw.org/ • The Association for Legal Career Professionals (NALP) http://www.nalp.org/fulltextofnalpprinciplesandstandards American Bar Association Pipeline Council 62 Reports and Publications • The Educational Pipeline to the Legal Profession: A Thought Paper http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/young _lawyers/thought_paper_resource_on_pipeline_diversity_for_pipelin e_council_website.authcheckdam.pdf • Diversity in the Legal Profession: The Next Steps http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/diversi ty/next_steps_2011.authcheckdam.pdf American Bar Association Pipeline Council 63 Reports and Publications (continued) • ABA Judicial Division Report from “Perceptions of Justice” Town Hall meetings http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/lawy ers_conference/2011_poj_writtenreport.authcheckdam.pdf (link) • ABA Publication on Diversity: • Verna Myers – Moving Diversity Forward: How to Go from WellMeaning to Well-Doing American Bar Association Pipeline Council 64 Reports and Publications (continued) • Add diversity publications from other ABA entities American Bar Association Pipeline Council 65