differentiation refers to the myriad variations among people based on selected social characteristics
e.g., age, sex, race, educational attainment, occupational status, etc.
Early sociologists like Durkheim saw social differentiation as a master process of modernization
modernization: the transformation from traditional to complex, modern society
Conditions that promote differentiation also promote deviance
They also likely boost the degree and range of social stratification by increasing the # of criteria for comparing people
2
Structural theories
emphasize the relationship of deviance to certain structural conditions within a society
focus on epidemiology , or the distribution of deviance in time and place
are typically macro-level and are considered general theories
e.g., functionalism and conflict theory
Process/Interaction theories
describe the processes by which individuals come to commit deviant acts
focus on etiology , or the origins and development of deviance
are typically micro-level theories
e.g., labeling theory, control theory, and learning or socialization theories
3
Ch. 3, Howard S. Becker
moral entrepreneurs are people who seek to influence a group to adopt or maintain a norm
they may create “moral panics” around perceived urgent problems, e.g.,
drinking alcohol or sexual psychopathy
moral entrepreneurs can be divided into:
rule creators
rule enforcers
5
The 18 th Amendment of the US Constitution (ratified in
1919), along with the Volstead Act, established
Prohibition (of "intoxicating liquors,“ except those used for religious purposes) in the US.
Demand for liquor continued, with the following results:
criminalization of producers, suppliers, transporters and consumers
police, courts and prisons were overwhelmed with new cases
organized crime increased in power
corruption extended among law enforcement officials
The amendment was repealed in 1933 by ratification of the 21 st Amendment, the only instance in US history of repeal of a constitutional amendment
6
Rule creators: “moral crusaders,” fervent, righteous, often self-righteous
Mission is to promote their sense of morality - thereby defining and combating deviance - for the presumed good of others
Chief concern is the ends - persuasion of others - not the means by which persuasion is achieved
Successful moral crusades are generally dominated by those in the upper social strata of society
They must build public awareness of a problem, and have power, public support, and a clear and acceptable solution to the problem
tend to have “strange bedfellows,” e.g.,
overlap & cooperation among Temperance, Abolitionist, Women’s
Rights, and anti-Child Labor movements in the late-19 th , early 20 th centuries
alliance formation among conservative Christian activists and Feminists in antitrafficking campaigns
7
Successful crusades produce new sets of rules & enforcement agents/agencies, thus institutionalizing the crusade
Rule enforcers, e.g., police, are compelled by two drives:
the need to justify their own role
the need to win respect in interactions
They are in a bind: if they show too much effectiveness one might say they are not needed, and if they show too little effectiveness one might say they are failing
Rule enforcers just feel the need to enforce the rule because that is their job; they are not really concerned with the content of the rule
As rules are changed, something that was once acceptable may now be punished and vice versa
Such officials tend to take a pessimistic view of human nature due to constant exposure to willful deviance
8
a good deal of enforcement activity is devoted not to the actual enforcement of rules, but to coercing respect from the people the enforcer deals with
people may be labeled deviant not due to breaking a rule but showing disrespect
9
Whether a person who commits a deviant act is in fact labeled a deviant depends on things besides his actual behavior:
whether official feels pressure at the time to justify his/her position
whether respect is shown to enforcer
whether the “fix is in”
amateurs tend to be caught, convicted, and labeled deviant much more than professionals (who know the “fixer”)
whether the kind of act committed is high on enforcer’s priority list
10
Ch. 7, Emile Durkheim
Crime is present in all societies of all types
Its form changes
acts thus characterized are not the same everywhere but everywhere and always there have been people whose behavior draws punishment
Crime is not only inevitable, it is necessary
- an integral part of all healthy societies
12
Crime consists of an act that offends certain very strong collective sentiments
It is not the intrinsic quality of a given act that makes it a crime, but the definition which the “collective conscience” of society gives it
13
Where crime exists, collective sentiments are sufficiently flexible to take on a new form, and crime sometimes helps determine the form they will take
Socrates’ crime, independence of thought, provided a service not only to humanity but to his country, preparing the ground for a new morality & faith in
Athens, since traditions were no longer in harmony with current conditions
his violation was a crime, but it was useful as a prelude to necessary reforms
14
Crime must no longer be conceived as an evil to be suppressed
Instead, we should attempt to discern its
“social function,” the purpose it serves for society
15
Ch. 8, Kai T. Erikson
communities: collectivities of people who share a common sphere of experience, which gives members a sense of belonging to a special
“kind” and living in a special “place”
communities are “boundary-maintaining”: each community has a specific territory in the world, occupying a defined region of geographical and cultural space
both dimensions of group space – geographical & cultural – set the community apart and provide a point of reference for members
17
Q: How do people know about boundaries and how do they convey it to future generations?
A: By participating in the confrontations which occur when persons venture out to the edges of the group are met by policing agents whose job it is to guard the cultural integrity of the community
18
Confrontations - criminal trials, excommunication hearings, courts-martial, psychiatric case conferences act as boundary-maintaining devices in that they demonstrate where the line is drawn b/w behavior that is acceptable in the community and behavior that is not
Each time the community moves to censure some act of deviation and convenes a formal ceremony to deal with the responsible offender, it sharpens the authority of the violated norm and restates group boundaries
Still, community boundaries are never fixed but are subject to change - as the nature & location of confrontations change
19
Deviant behavior, by marking the outer edges of group life, provides a framework within which members develop a sense of their own cultural identity
“…the agencies built by society for preventing deviance are often so poorly equipped for the task that we might well ask why this is regarded as their ‘real’ function in the first place” (98)
20
The community’s decision to bring deviant sanctions against a member is a “rite of transition,” moving the person out of an ordinary place in society into a special deviant position
commitment ceremonies: highly public & dramatic events set up to judge whether or not someone is deviant, mark this change of status
the criminal trial is the most obvious example
importantly, in our culture, they are almost irreversible, and might be called “self-fulfilling prophecies”
21
Two separate yet often competing currents are found in any society:
forces which promote a high degree of conformity among people of community so they know what to expect from one another
forces which encourage a certain degree of diversity so that people can be deployed across the range of group space to survey its potential, measure its capacity, and patrol its boundaries for deviants
Deviance is a natural product of group differentiation and contributes to the survival of the culture as a whole
22