Children’s Science Congress DR LALIT SHARMA MEMBER NATIONAL ACADEMIC CORE COMMITTEE (CSC 2014, 2015) What is CSC? A program of NCSTC, DST, Govt. of India Team of 2 to 5 children From age group of 10 to 17 years Guided by teachers, any expert Undertake project work using methods of science On a local problem under a focal and sub-theme Project evaluated for innovativeness, simplicity and practicality CSC project Innovative, simple, practical and inexpensive Outcome of a team work Based on exploration of everyday life situations Survey/observation/experimentation/combination of all Analysis based on scientific methodology with definite output Attempt to take on a problem related to society, locally Definite follow-up plans Children’s Science Congress Common Evaluation Criteria Originality of the idea (10 / 5) This covers originality (uniqueness / novelty) of the idea that attempts to answer specific question related to focal theme Relevance of the project (10 / 5) How relevant the project is to focal theme and sub-theme Understanding of the issue (15 / 15) Refers to extent of knowledge in relation to the project idea Data collection and analysis (15 / 15) Systematic data collection using relevant tools (interviews / questionnaire) Sufficient sample size Analysis includes tabulation, categorization, application of simple statistics Experimentation / validation (10 / 10) Conducting of experiments / field study and validating by methods of science Experiment should be simple, self-developed, inexpensive Interpretation and problem solving attempt (10 / 15) Extent to which proposed hypothesis and local issue have been addressed through the project Team work (10 / 5) Work division, cooperation, sharing among and beyond team members Background correction (10 /-) Weightage given to those from difficult geographical situation, have poor infrastructure and limited facilities Oral presentation / written report (10 / 10) Evaluated separately Proper presentation, interaction, use of aids Proper documentation, orderly, neatly Follow up and action plan (- /10) Has the message community? been conveyed to How it has been communicated? Is it going to be continued involving more people? Any action plan suggested? Improvement over previous level (- / 10) To encourage for continuous involvement At National Level Parameters Attributes ORAL PRESENTATION Originality of idea and concept 05 Relevance of the project to the theme 05 Understanding of the issue 05 Data collection and analysis 10 Experimentation / validation 10 Interpretation and problem solving attempt 05 Presentation 10 At National Level Parameters Attributes WRITTEN REPORT Data collection / analysis, representation 15 Methodology / experimental design 15 Discussion / conclusion 10 POSTER Layout 05 Logical framework 05 Project Work: A local problem / issue identified Work carried out in a well-marked local or geographical area Observations recorded in a log book Project could either be survey / observation / experimentation / combination Data collected are subjected to analysis Conclusions are drawn after proper analysis of data Inferences are made Solutions to the problem are suggested Action plan for follow up devised Use of living objects, harmful and inflammable substances is restricted Documented as a report and presented orally at district, state and national levels Written Report : Report to be handwritten in any scheduled language on A-4 size (21 cm x 31 cm or 8.3” x 11.8”) plain paper Word limit is 2500 (lower group) and 3500 (upper group) Elements of written report : Cover page, Abstract, Form-A, Index, Introduction, Aims and Objectives, Hypothesis, Work plan, Methodology, Observations, Results, Data analysis, Conclusion, Inference, Solution, Future plan, Acknowledgements, References and Appendix Log book is a must, reflects team work, to be submitted along with report COVER PAGE 22nd Children’s Science Congress (CSC-2014) Focal Theme: Understanding Weather and Climate Title of the Project (Should be informative, specific, concise and self-explanatory) Names and addresses of Team Leader Other Members Guide Teacher District State (To be written in English or Hindi ONLY) ABSTRACT One of the most important elements of a scientific report Word limit is 250 words (one A-4 size page) Summary of the report / work done including – question investigated – the methods used – the principal results and – conclusions Wording should be clear and precise (Abstract in English is mandatory) REGISTRATION FORM - A District __________ Particulars of the Team Leader: Name Date of Birth Std/Class Residential address School address Title of the project: Language used: Particulars of other team members: Name Residential address Sex State __________ Sex Rural/Urban Sub-theme: Std/Class Date of Birth Name and address of the Guide: Name and signature of the Head of the Institution/ District Coordinator INDEX Contents page to have separate sections for subject matter (all the components of the report) figures (include titles given to chart (piechart), or graph, or photograph, or illustration or map) and tables (include titles or headings of your observation, result or data analysis tables ) INDEX S. No. 01 02 list of figures – S. No. 01 02 03 list of tables – S. No. 01 02 03 Topic Introduction Aims and objectives Title Graph showing variation in temperatures Pie-chart showing distribution of land forms Photograph showing collection of fossils Title Temperatures recorded during one month period Varieties of butterfly species observed Electric power consumption in homes Page No. 01 02 Page No. 09 11 13 Page No. 12 14 16 INTRODUCTION At the top Title of the Project should be mentioned Title should be informative, specific, concise, understandable and self-explanatory The introduction should have Relevant background information Need statement focusing on the overall issue, problem, or core / research question One or two but not more than three paragraphs AIMS & OBJECTIVES Should define very specifically Why this project has been selected? How this problem / issue would be addressed? Keeping in mind that there is Limited time period and Limited localized geographical area Avoid repeating introduction HYPOTHESIS In one or two statements, hypothesis should give an idea, based on known facts that has not yet been proven, about the problem selected WORK PLAN Define work plan, in schematic form or as a flow chart, preferably with time schedules It might get deviated from schedule due to unforeseen circumstances, but having such a guideline always help METHODOLOGY After work plan, decide upon method of research in proposed work; survey/observation/ experimentation Survey Involves using questionnaire for data collection Questions should be specific and in logical order On an average 20 relevant questions should be asked Sample size of 50 – 100 people should be included in the study Include a copy of questionnaire METHODOLOGY Observations Though a part of survey work, may or may not have questionnaire Recording of observations during field studies are included in this type of methodology METHODOLOGY Experimentation Done with own hands, either in the laboratory or at home or in the field Design of the experiment with proper controls, number of readings, set of conditions, parameters, mathematical formula to be included Detail experimental procedure, analytical techniques also to be included OBSERVATIONS This part contains all the observations or data collected related to survey, observation, and / or experimentation, ONLY RESULTS Results are the presentation of data collected during survey, observation and / or experimentation Presentation could either be in the form of charts, graphs, maps, figures or tables etc Should be simple to understand Results only describe and not interpret findings DATA ANALYSIS Data presented under the results are analyzed, using principles of mathematics Here only analysis part is shown CONCLUSION After project completion, final opinion is derived, based on the data analysis, is what forms the conclusion INFERENCE Inference, in fact, is the truthfulness of the opinion formed based on the outcome of the project Check-point for hypothesis– accepted / rejected SOLUTION Since the problem selected is socially relevant, this part will highlight how the findings influence or have an impact on the society at large FUTURE PLANS For taking the work further, from where it has been concluded, future plans provide stepwise guidelines It shows that the problem undertaken is openended It ascertains continuity of efforts, gives sense of commitment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS An expression of gratefulness or thankfulness for the help received from different quarters; family and friends, any motivator, elders / seniors / peers, experts or resource persons, even a librarian, farm workers, people interviewed, laboratory assistants, photographer, anyone for that matter A true reflection of team work REFERENCES All the resource material like books, newspaper articles / clippings, or internet, or even personal interview are to be mentioned References, under each section, are given in alphabetical order REFERENCES For books Name of the author(s)/editor(s) starting with surname Title of the book (underlined) Edition (if available) Page numbers referred Publisher Place and Year of publication REFERENCES For articles Name of the author(s) starting with surname Year of publication (within brackets) Title of the article (in italics) Title of the book / magazine / newspaper (underlined) Edition (for books, if available) Issue and volume numbers (for magazines) Page numbers referred Publisher Place and Year of publication Or internet source starting with www.website referred REFERENCES For personal interviews Name of the person(s) interviewed Date with month and year and Place of the interview APPENDIX All the letters, certificates issued by the concerned authorities and / or survey sheets (filled up questionnaire) are to be attached at the end of the report Each such document should bear a number, viz., appendix 1, appendix 2, and so on LOG BOOK This is one of the most important but neglected written documents It is the mirror reflecting activity Provides all the answers related to the project Covers minute to minute recordings, mentioned on daily basis, successes and failures, contacts and impressions Oral Presentation: Time limit is 8 minutes followed by interaction for 2 minutes Maximum of four charts or posters (55 cm x 70 cm) / LCD projector can be used Loud enough with clear diction EXPECTATIONS FROM EVALUATORS CHILD SCIENTISTS ARE FROM 10-17 YEARS AGE GROUP, WHO NEEDS ENCOURAGEMENT UNDERSTAND THEIR CAPABILITIES & CAPACITIES AND PROVIDE CONSTRUCTIVE INPUTS & POSITIVE FEEDBACK APPRECIATE & VALUE EFFORTS, INNOVATIVENESS & CONFIDENCE THEY SHOULD RETURN INTELLECTUALLY RICH MOTIVATED & EVALUATE SUBJECT MATTER, SCIENTIFIC CONTENT & NOT GADGETS, MODELS OR ORATORY SKILL AVOID UNWARRANTED COMMENTS, COMPARISON WITH SENIORS, DISTRACTION DURING PRESENTATION INTERACT, BUT DO NOT TEST WHAT THEY DO NOT KNOW RATHER HELP IN BRINGING OUT WHAT THEY KNOW Than’Q drlalitsharma9@gmail.com 93 222 64 173