Personality – the unique way in which each individual thinks, acts, and feels throughout life › Character – value judgments of a person’s moral and ethical behavior › Temperament – the enduring characteristics with which each person is born Personality should not be confused with character or temperament › Temperament is based on one’s biology, either through genetic influences, prenatal influences, or a combination of those influences, and forms the basis for personality to be built upon Both character and temperament are vital parts of personality › Every adult personality is a combination of temperaments and personal history of family, culture, and the time during which they grew up Personality is still a relatively young field and there are several different ways in which the characteristic behavior of human beings can be explained One reason no single explanation of personality exists is because personality is still difficult to measure precisely and scientifically There are 4 traditional perspectives in personality theory Psychodynamic perspective: focuses on the role of the unconscious mind in the development of personality and also greatly emphasizes the role of biological causes of personality differences › Behaviorist perspective: based on the theories of learning and focuses on the effect of the environment on behavior › Humanistic perspective: focuses on the role of each person’s conscious life experiences and choices in personality development › Trait perspective: differs from the other 3 in its basic goals › The psychoanalytic, behaviorist, and humanistic perspectives all seek to explain how personality forms Trait perspective focuses on the end result – the characteristics themselves There are some trait theorists that assume that traits are biologically determined, but others make no such assumption Understanding Freud’s cultural background helps us understand how he developed his ideas and theories of personality Born in the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1856, Freud’s family moved to Vienna when he was only 4 years old He lived there until 1938, when Germany occupied Austria, and Freud, of Jewish background, moved to England to escape the Nazis During this time period, Europe was in what is commonly known as the Victorian Age › The Victorian Age was a time of sexual repression › People growing up in this period were told by their church that sex should take place only in the context of marriage and then only to make babies › To enjoy sexual intercourse was considered a sin Men were understood to be unable to control their “animal” desires at times › A good Victorian husband would father several children with his wife and then turn to a mistress for sexual comfort, leaving his wife untouched Women, especially those of the upper class, were not supposed to have sexual urges › It’s no wonder that many of Freud’s patients were wealthy women with problems stemming from unfulfilled sexual desires or sexual repression Freud’s “obsession” with sexual explanations for abnormal behavior seems more understandable in light of his cultural background and that of his patients Freud came to believe that there were layers of consciousness in the mind › His belief in the influence of the unconscious mind on conscious behavior, published in The Psychopathology of Everyday Life in 1901, shocked the Victorian world Freud believed that the mind was divided into 3 parts The conscious mind: one’s current awareness The preconscious mind: contains memories, information, and events of which one can easily become aware › The unconscious mind – level of he mind in which thoughts, feelings, memories, and other information are kept that are not easily or voluntarily brought into consciousness › › While no one really disagreed with the idea of a conscious or preconscious mind, the unconscious mind was the real departure for the professional of Freud’s day Freud theorized that there is a part of the mind that remains hidden at all times, surfacing only in symbolic form in dreams and in behavior people engage in without knowing why they have done so › Even when a person makes a determined effort to bring a memory out of the unconscious mind, it will not appear directly, according to Freud › Freud believed that the unconscious mind was the most important determining factor in human behavior and personality Freud believed, based on observations of his patients, that personality itself could be divided into 3 parts, each existing at one or more levels of conscious awareness The way these 3 parts of the personality develop and interact with one another became the heart of his theory Id – part of the personality present at birth and completely unconscious › › › The id is the first and most primitive part of the personality It is completely unconscious Pleasure-seeking, amoral part of the personality that contains all of the basic biological drives: hunger, thirst, self-preservation, and sex Freud did believe that babies have sex drives, which shocked and outraged his colleagues and fellow Victorians By “sex drive” he really meant “pleasure drive,” the need to seek out pleasurable sensations › People do seem to be pleasure-seeking creatures, and even infants seek pleasure from sucking and chewing on anything they can get into their mouths › Thinking about what infants are like when they are just born provides a good picture of the id › › Infants are demanding, irrational, illogical, and impulsive They want their needs satisfied immediately, and they don’t care about anyone else’s needs or desires Freud called this need for satisfaction the pleasure principle – principle by which the id functions; the immediate satisfaction of needs without regard for the consequences › The pleasure principle can be summed up simply as “if it feels good, do it” A word of caution › The fact that infant behavior seems to fit Freud’s concept of the id is not proof that the id exists › It simply means that Freud came up with the concepts of the id to fit what he already knew about infants People normally try to satisfy an infant’s needs as quickly as possible › But as infants begin to grow, adults start denying them their every wish › Infants are fed when hungry, changed when wet, and tended to whenever they cry There will be things they cannot touch or hold, and they must learn to wait for certain things Freud would say that reality has hit, and the id simply cannot deal with the reality of having to wait or not getting what it wants › Worse still would be the possibility of punishment as a result of the id’s unrestrained actions According to Freud, to deal with reality, a second part of the personality develops Ego – part of the personality that develops out of a need to deal with reality, mostly conscious, rational, and logical The ego works on the reality principle – principle by which the satisfaction of the demands of the id only when negative consequences will not result This means that sometimes the ego decides to deny the id its desires because the consequences would be painful of too unpleasant Ex. An infant might reach out and take an object despite a parent telling them not to, but a toddler with the developing ego will avoid taking the object when the parent says, “No!” to avoid punishment › However, the toddler may go back for the object when the parent is not looking A simple way to state the reality principle of the ego is “if it feels good, do it, but only if you can get away with it” Superego – the part of the personality that acts as a moral center The superego is Freud’s third and final part of the personality The superego develops as a preschool-aged child learns the rules, customs, and expectations of society The superego contains the conscience – produces guilt or moral anxiety when they do wrong, or engage in an unacceptable behavior › It isn’t until the conscience develops that children have a sense of “right and wrong” Anyone who has ever watched cartoons has probably seen Freud’s 3 parts of personality in animated form › The id is usually a little devil Makes demands › The superego is the little angel Putting restrictions on the id’s demands › The ego is the person or animal caught in the middle, trying to decide what to do Has to come up with a plan that will quiet the id but satisfy the superego Sometimes the id or the superego does not get its way, resulting in a great deal of anxiety for the ego itself › This constant state of conflict is Freud’s view of how personality works › It’s only when the anxiety created by this conflict gets out of hand that disordered behavior arises Psychological defense mechanisms – unconscious distortions of a person’s perception of reality that reduce stress and anxiety › Defense mechanisms were mainly outlined and studied by Freud’s daughter, Anna Freud In order for the 3 parts of the personality to function, the constant conflict among them must be managed › Freud assumed that the defense mechanisms were one of the most important tools for dealing with the anxiety caused by this conflict Denial – refusal to recognize or acknowledge a threatening situation › Ex. Ben is an alcoholic who denies being an alcoholic › Ex. Elise, who was sexually abused as a child, cannot remember the abuse at all › Ex. “If I don’t have breakfast, I can have that piece of cake later on without hurting my diet.” Repression – “pushing” threatening or conflicting events or situations out of conscious memory Rationalization – making up acceptable excuses for unacceptable behavior Projection – placing one’s own unacceptable thoughts onto others, as if the thoughts belonged to them and not to oneself › Ex. Tina is attracted to her sister’s husband but denies this and believes the husband is attracted to her Reaction formation – forming an emotional reaction or attitude that is the opposite of one’s threatening or unacceptable actual thoughts › Ex. Matt is unconsciously attracted to Ben but outwardly voices an extreme hatred of homosexuals Displacement – expressing feelings that would be threatening if directed at the real target onto a less threatening substitute target › Regression – falling back on childlike patterns as a way of coping with stressful situations › Ex. 4 year old Jeff starts wetting his bed after his parents bring home a new baby › Ex. Mary really admires Suzy, the most popular girl in school, and tries to copy her behavior and dress Identification – trying to become like someone else to deal with one’s anxiety Compensation (substitution) – trying to make up for areas in which a lack is perceived by becoming superior in some other area › Ex. Sandra gets reprimanded by her boss and goes home to angrily pick a fight with her husband Ex. Reggie is not good at athletics, so he puts all of his energies into becoming an academic scholar Sublimation – turning socially unacceptable urges into socially acceptable behavior › Ex. Alan, who is very aggressive, becomes a professional hockey player For Freud, the 3 parts of the personality develop in a series of stages Because he focused heavily on the sex drive, he believed that the stages were determined by the developing sexuality of the child › Psychosexual stages – 5 stages of personality development proposed by Freud and tied to the sexual development of the child At each stage, a different erogenous zone, or area of the body that produces pleasurable feelings, becomes important and can become the source of conflicts Conflicts that are not fully resolved result in a “fixation” › Fixation – disorder in which the person does not fully resolve the conflict in a particular psychosexual stage, resulting in personality traits and behavior associated with that earlier stage › The child may grow into an adult but will still carry emotional and psychological “baggage” from that earlier fixated stage Oral stage – first stage occurring in the first year to year and a half of life in which the mouth is the erogenous zone and weaning is the primary conflict The oral stage is dominated by the id The conflict that can arise here, according to Freud, will be over weaning (taking the mother’s breast away from the child, who will now drink from a cup) › Weaning that occurs too soon or too late can result in too little or too much satisfaction of the child’s oral needs › Resulting in the activities and personality traits associated with an orally fixated adult personality Overeating, drinking too much, chain smoking, talking too much, nail biting, gum chewing, and a tendency to be either too dependent and optimistic (when the oral needs are overindulged) or too aggressive and pessimistic (when the oral needs are denied) Anal stage – second stage occurring from about 1 or 1 ½ years of age, in which the anus is the erogenous zone and toilet training is the source of conflict As a child becomes a toddler, Freud believed that the erogenous zone moves from the mouth to the anus › Because he also believed that children got a great deal of pleasure from both withholding and releasing their feces at will The main area of conflict here is toilet training, the demand that the child use the toilet at a particular time and in a particular way This invasion of reality is part of the process that stimulates the development of the ego during this stage Fixation at the anal stage, from toilet training that is too harsh can take on 2 forms › Anal expulsive personality › The child who rebels openly against the demands of the parents and other adults will refuse to go in the toilet, instead defecating where and when he/she feels like doing it This translates in the adult as a person who sees messiness as a statement of personal control and who is somewhat destructive and hostile (“slobs”) Anal retentive personality The child is terrified of making a mess and rebels passively – refusing to go at all or retaining feces – no mess no punishment As adults, they are stingy, stubborn, and excessively neat Phallic stage – third stage occurring from about 3-6 years of age, in which the child discovers sexual feelings As the child grows older, the erogenous zone shifts to the genitals › Children have discovered the differences between the sexes by now, and most have also engaged in normal self-stimulation of the genitals, or masturbation The awakening of sexual curiosity and interest in the genitals marks the beginning of the phallic stage Freud believed that when boys realized that little girls don’t have a penis, they developed a fear of losing their penis called castration anxiety › While girls developed penis envy because they were missing a penis › Fortunately, nearly all psychoanalysts have long since abandoned the concept of penis envy The conflict in the phallic stage centers on the awakening sexual feelings of the child › Freud essentially believed that boys develop both sexual attraction to their mothers and jealousy of their fathers during this stage, called the Oedipus complex › › The sexual attraction is not that of an adult male for a female but more of a sexual curiosity that becomes mixed up with the boy’s feelings of love and affection for his mother His jealousy of his father leads to feelings of anxiety and fears that his father, a powerful authority figure, might get angry and do something terrible To deal with this anxiety, 2 things must occur by the time the phallic stage ends › › Oedipus complex/Electra complex – situation occurring in the phallic stage in which a child develops a sexual attraction to the opposite-sex parent and jealousy of the same-sex parent The boy will repress his sexual feelings for his mother and identify with his father The boy tries to be like his father in every way, taking on the father’s behavior, mannerisms, values and moral beliefs as his own, so that Daddy won’t be able to get angry with the boy Girls go through a similar process called the Electra complex with their father as the target of their affections and their mother as the rival The result of identification is the development of the superego, the internalized moral values of the same-sex parent If things go wrong: if a child does not have a same-sex parent to identify with, or the opposite-sex parent encourages the sexual attraction, fixation can occur › Fixation in the phallic stage usually involves immature sexual attitudes as an adult People who are fixated, according to Freud, will often exhibit promiscuous sexual behavior and be very vain The vanity is seen as a cover-up for feelings of low self-worth arising from the failure to resolve the complex › The lack or moral sexual behavior stems from the failure of identification and the inadequate formation of the superego › Additionally, men with this fixation may be “mama’s boys” who never quite grow up › Women with this fixation may look for much older father figures to marry › Latency – fourth stage occurring during the school years, in which sexual feelings of the child are repressed while the child develops in other ways Remember that at the end of the phallic stage, sexual feelings for the opposite sex have been pushed into the unconscious In this stage, children grow and develop intellectually, physically, and socially but not sexually This is the age at which boys play with other boys and girls play with other girls › Boys have cooties and girls are yucky When puberty begins, the sexual feelings that were repressed surface again › Bodies develop and sexual urges are allowed into consciousness Sexual urges are no longer directed at parents › When kids are 3, parents are their whole world › When kids are 13, they want parents to walk 20 feet behind them in the mall so their friends won’t see them The focus of sexual curiosity and attraction will be other adolescents or celebrities of some sort Since Freud tied personality development to sexual development, the genital stage represented the final process in his personality theory › And as the entry into adult social and sexual behavior Psychoanalysis – Freud’s term for both the theory of personality and the therapy based on it At first Freud’s ideas were resisted and ridiculed, but eventually theorists altered the focus of psychoanalysis from biology and sexuality to the impact of the social environment At the same time, they retained many of Freud’s original concepts such as the id, ego, and superego, and defense mechanisms Neo-Freudians – followers of Freud who developed their own competing psychodynamic theories Disagreed with Freud about the nature of the unconscious mind Jung believed that the unconscious held much more than personal fears, urges, and memories › Personal unconscious – unconscious mind as described by Freud consisting of personal fears, urges, and memories › Collective unconscious – memories shared by all members of the human species According to Jung, the collective unconscious contains a kind of “species” or “racial” memory › Memories of ancient fears and themes that seem to occur in many folktales and cultures called archetypes 2 of the more well known archetypes › Anima/animus: the feminine side of man/the masculine side of woman › Shadow: the dark side of personality, called the “devil” in Western cultures Adler believed that the driving force behind all human behavior was the seeking of superiority, unlike Freud who believed it was sexual pleasure Believed that as children, all people develop feelings of inferiority when they compare themselves with the more powerful adults in their world › Focused on the defense mechanism of compensation, in which people try to overcome feelings of inferiority in one area of life by striving to be superior in another area › Adler also developed a theory that the birth order of a child affected personality Firstborn children with younger siblings feel inferior once those younger siblings get all the attention and often overcompensate by becoming overachievers › Middle children feel superior over the older child and also dominate younger siblings and tend to be competitive › Younger children are supposedly pampered and protected but feel inferior because they are not allowed the freedom and responsibility of older children › Although some researchers have found evidence to support this birth order theory, others criticize their research as biased and sloppy Disagreed with Freud over sex differences and strongly opposed his concept of penis envy Developed her own concept of “womb envy,” stating that men felt the need to compensate for their lack of childbearing ability by striving for success in other areas Horney focused on the child’s sense of basic anxiety – the anxiety created when a child is born into the bigger and more powerful world of older children and adults › People whose parents give them love, affection, and security overcome this anxiety › People with less secure upbringings develop neurotic personalities – personalities involving maladaptive ways of dealing with relationships Some children try to deal with their anxiety by moving toward people, becoming dependent and clingy Others move against people, becoming aggressive, demanding, and cruel Erikson was an art teacher who became a psychoanalyst by studying with Anna Freud (Sigmund Freud’s daughter) Emphasized that social relationships are important at every stage of life › We went over Erikson in chapter 8 Some of Freud’s concepts have remained useful and still form a basis for many modern personality theories The idea of defense mechanisms › Received some research support › Has remained useful in clinical psychology as a way of describing people’s defensive behavior and irrational thinking The concept of an unconscious mind also has some research support › Modern researchers have had to admit that there are influences on human behavior that exist outside of normal conscious awareness › Much of this research has been in the area of hypnosis and subliminal perception › Other researchers are looking into the concept of implicit memory and implicit learning FREUD DIDN’T DO ANY EXPERIMENTS OR RESEARCH!!! › His theory is based on his own observations of his patients’ memories of their childhoods and life experiences › He freely decided if what his patients told him was fantasy or fact, depending on how well those memories fit in with his developing theory of psychoanalysis › Ex. Many of Freud’s patients told him that they were sexually abused by fathers, brothers, and other close family members Freud was apparently unable to accept these memories as real and decided that they were fantasies, which he used to form the basis of the Oedipus/Electra complex FREUD BASED MUCH OF HIS DIAGNOSIS OF PATIENT’S PROBLEMS ON THE INTERPRETATIONS OF DREAMS AND RESULTS OF PATIENTS FREE-ASSOCIATION!!! › We know from our previous discussion of dreams during the chapter on consciousness that dreams are not very realistic… › These “sources” of information are often criticized as being too ambiguous and without scientific support for the validity of Freud’s interpretations › The very ambiguity of these sources of information allowed Freud to fit the patient’s words and recollections to his own preferred interpretation › Ambiguity of the sources also increased the possibility that Freud’s own suggestions and interpretations, if conveyed to the patient, might alter the actual memories, who would no doubt be in a very suggestible state of mind during therapy Another criticism is that Freud based his theory on a very limited demographic: sexually repressed and frustrated higher class Austrian women of the Victorian era Critics point out that basing his theory on observations of such a limited demographic promoted his emphasis on sexuality as the root of all problems in personality And a problem your text doesn’t point out: Freud had an addiction to cocaine › He even wrote a monograph, called “Über Coca,” about how great it was and how much he liked it which was published in a journal in July of 1884 › This paper was the first in which he shifted from scientific evidence toward his own personal opinions Most professionals today are very skeptical of Freud’s theories, but alas, his influence on the modern world cannot be ignored… Freudian concepts have had an impact on literature, movies, and even children’s cartoons People who have never taken a course in psychology are familiar with some of Freud’s most basic concepts, such as the defense mechanisms Freud was also one of the first theorists to emphasize the importance of childhood experiences on personality development › In spite of the fact he didn’t work with children › One can only wonder how Freud might have changed his theory in light of what is known about the workings of the human brain and the changes in society that exist today It has only been in the last several decades that people have had the necessary tools to examine the concepts of the unconscious mind A the time that Freud’s theory was shocking the Western world, the behaviorist and social cognitive theorists were also making an influence › Behaviorists use the principles of conditioning to explain actions and reactions of animals and humans › Social cognitive theorists emphasize the influence of social and cognitive factors on learning Both have a very different view of personality from psychodynamics Behaviorists view personality as nothing more than a set of learned responses or habits - sets of well-learned responses that have become automatic The very strictest traditional view of Watson and Skinner, everything a person or animal does is a response to some environmental stimulus that has been reinforced or strengthened by a reward in some way Think about how a traditional behaviorist might explain a shy personality Beginning in childhood, a person might be exposed to a parent with a rather harsh discipline style (stimulus) › Avoiding the attention of that parent would result in fewer punishments and scolding, so the avoidance response is negatively reinforced – the “bad thing” or punishment is avoided by keeping out of sight as quiet › Later, that child might generalize that avoidance response to other authority figures and adults, such as teachers › In this way, a pattern (habit) of shyness would develop › Social cognitive learning theorists – emphasize the importance of both the influences of other people’s behavior and of a person’s own expectancies of learning › They suggest that observational learning, modeling, and other cognitive learning techniques can lead to the formation of patterns of personality Albert Bandura (the guy that did the “BoBo Doll studies) has one of the more well-researched learning theories › Social cognitive view – behavior is governed not just by the influence of external stimuli and response patterns but also by cognitive processes such as anticipating, judging, and memory as well as learning though the imitation of models Bandura believes that 3 factors influence one another in determining the patterns of behavior that make up personality The environment, the behavior itself, and the individual’s personal or cognitive factors that the person brings into the situation from earlier experiences › These 3 factors each affect the other 2 in a reciprocal, or give-and-take, relationship › Reciprocal determinism – Bandura’s explanation of how the factors of environment, personal characteristics, and behavior can interact to determine future behavior › Environment Reinforcers Behavior Personal/Cognitive Factors Beliefs, expectancies, personal dispositions The environment includes the actual physical surroundings, the other people who may or may not be present, and the potential for reinforcement in those surroundings The intensity and frequency of the behavior will not only be influenced by the environment, but will also have an impact on that environment The person brings previously reinforced responses (personality in other words) and mental processes such as thinking and anticipating into the situation Example of how this works › Richard walks into a classroom filled with other students, but no teachers are present at this time This is the environment › Part of Richard’s personal characteristics include the desire to have attention from other people by talking loudly and telling jokes, which has been very rewarding to him in the past Past reinforcements are part of his cognitive processes, or expectancies of future rewards for his behavior › › › › › Also in the past, he has found that he gets more attention when an authority figure is not present His behavior will most likely be to start talking and telling jokes, which will continue if he gets the reaction he expects from his fellow students If the teacher walks in (the environment changes), his behavior will change If the other students don’t laugh, his behavior will change In the future Richard might be less likely to behave in the same way because his expectations for reward are different Cognitive element of his personal variables One of the more important personal variables that Bandura talks about is self-efficacy – a person’s expectancy of how effective his or her efforts to accomplish a goal will be in any particular circumstance A person’s sense of self-efficacy can be high or low depending on: What has happened in similar circumstances in the past (success or failure) › What other people tell them about their competence › Their own assessment of their abilities › Ex. Fiona has an opportunity to write a paper for extra credit in a class, she will be more likely to do so if her self-efficacy is high: › › › She has gotten good grades on such papers in the past Her teachers have told her that she writes well She knows she can write a good paper According to Bandura, people high in self-efficacy are more persistent and expect to succeed, whereas people low in selfefficacy expect to fail and tend to avoid challenges Julian Rotter devised a theory of personality based on the basic principle of motivation, derived from Thorndike’s law of effect › People are motivated to seek reinforcement and avoid punishment › If in the past, a certain way of responding led to a reinforcing or pleasurable consequence, that way of responding would become a pattern of responding, or part of the “personality” Rotter viewed personality as a relatively stable set of potential responses to various situations Concept of locus of control – the tendency for people to assume that they either have control or do not have control over events and consequences in their lives › Internal locus of control: people who assume that their own actions and decisions directly affect the consequences they experience High internal locus of control: high in achievement motivation (the will to succeed in any attempted task) › External locus of control: people who assume that their lives are more controlled by powerful others, luck, or fate High external locus of control: give up quickly or attribute events in their lives to external causes and fall into patterns of learned helplessness and depression Like Bandura, Rotter also believed that an interaction of factors would determine the behavioral patterns that become personality for an individual For Rotter there are 2 key factors that influence a person’s decision to act in any situation › Expectancy – a person’s subjective feeling that a particular behavior will lead to a reinforcing consequence (similar to Bandura’s concept of self-efficacy) › Reinforcement value - the value of the reinforcement expected by an individual for behaving in a certain way If a person has a high expectancy for success, the behavior will most likely occur › Expectancies are also based on past experiences with success and failure of a behavior Behaviorism has its limits in explaining personality › The classic behaviorism: views personality as only a conditioned set of responses Does not take mental processes or social influences into account when explaining learning and behavior Social cognitive view Does include social and mental processes and their influence on behavior › And, unlike psychoanalysis, the concepts can and have been scientifically tested › Most recent research has investigated how people’s expectancies can influence their control of their own negative moods Like if you expect something bad to happen if you perform a certain behavior, then you will be less likely to perform the behavior and avoid the negative outcome that may produce the negative mood › Also, you may be able to anticipate when something bad will happen and prepare yourself for it › The humanistic perspective arose in the mid-20th century as a backlash against psychoanalysis and behaviorism Humanistic perspective – the “third force” in psychology › Focuses on those aspects of personality that make people uniquely human Subjective feelings Freedom to choose one’s own destiny Self-actualizing tendency – the striving to fulfill one’s innate capacities and capabilities › Basically, trying to be all your genetics allows you to be Self-concept – the image of oneself that develops from interactions with important, significant people in one’s life Self – an individual’s awareness of his or her own personal characteristics and level of functioning As people try to be all they can be (selfactualization) they develop an image of themselves based on feed back from others (self-concept) that influences how they really view themselves (sense of self) Real self – one’s perceptions of actual characteristics, traits, and abilities › Forms the basis for striving for self-actualization › Primarily comes from those important, significant others in a person’s life, most often the parents Ideal self – one’s perception of whom one should be or would like to be When the real self and ideal self are very close or similar to each other, people feel competent and capable › › When there is a mismatch between the real self and the ideal self, anxiety and neurotic behavior can occur › More likely to occur if the real and ideal selves aren’t that far apart at the start When a person has a realistic view of the real self, and the ideal self is something that is actually attainable When a person’s view of self is distorted or the ideal self is impossible to attain It is primarily how the important people (who can be good or bad influences) in a person’s life react to the person that determines the degree of agreement between real and ideal selves Positive regard – warmth, affection, love, and respect that come from significant others in one’s life › Positive regard is vital to people’s ability to cope with stress and to strive to achieve self-actualization Unconditional positive regard – positive regard that is given without conditions or strings attached › Necessary for people to be able to explore fully all that they can achieve and become Conditional positive regard – positive regard that is given only when the person is doing what the providers of positive regard wish Ex. Karen & Sasha › Sasha is a freshman and is thinking about becoming a math teacher, a computer programmer, or an elementary school teacher Unconditional positive regard: Her parents have told her that her career choice is up to her and that they will love her no matter what › Karen is a freshman and already knows she is going to be a doctor Conditional positive regard: Her parents made it very clear to her as a child that they expected her to become a doctor, she believes if she tries to choose a different career, she will lose her parents’ love and respect For Rogers, the process of self-actualizing leads people to become a fully functioning person › Fully functioning person – a person who is in touch with their own feelings and abilities and are able to trust their innermost urges and intuitions › Through exploring your potentials and abilities you find out what you are good at and what you like › This leads you to find a match between your real self and your ideal self, which leads to Rogers’ idea of a fully functioning person To become a fully functioning person, a person needs unconditional positive regard › If you are not comfortable with exploring your options and your abilities because you are scared about losing the love of others, then you may never truly be in touch with your real self Differences between self-actualization and fully functioning (because they sound pretty similar) › › Self-actualization is a goal that people are always striving to reach Only a person who is fully functioning (in touch with their true self) is capable of reaching the goal of self-actualization So being fully functioning is a necessary step in the process of selfactualization So, you are constantly striving to be all you can be (selfactualization), even after you explore and become in touch with your true self › Ex. You explore several different fields during college and decide you want to be a scientific researcher This is a pretty close match between your real self and your ideal self because you are an inquisitive person and enjoy your selected field of interest, which allows you to be in touch with your self and fully functioning Now that you are fully functioning, you can strive to be all you can be (selfactualized) by conducting research experiments that contribute to humanities knowledge of certain concepts and phenomena You wouldn’t be able to do this if you had become a lawyer instead Some critics of the humanistic perspective of personality say it is too positive › Ignoring the more negative aspects of human nature › Ex. Would humanistic theory be able to explain the development of sociopathic or psychopathic personalities who have no conscience or moral nature? Or explain the motivation behind terrorism? Humanistic theory is also difficult to test scientifically › In fact there is little research to support this viewpoint › Thus, it can be considered more of a philosophical view of human behavior rather than a psychological explanation The greatest impact of the humanistic view › Development of therapies designed to promote self- growth and help people better understand themselves and others Trait theories – attempt to describe the characteristics that make up human personality in an effort to predict the future › Less concerned with how personality develops › More concerned with describing personality and using it to predict future behavior Trait – consistent, enduring way of thinking, feeling, or behaving › Trait theorists attempt to describe a personality in terms of a person’s traits One of the earliest attempts to list and describe the traits that make up personality Allport literally scanned the dictionary for words that could be traits and found about 18,000 › Then he eliminated synonyms resulting in 200 traits Allport believed that these traits were literally wired into the nervous system to guide one’s behavior across many different situations › And that each person’s “constellation” of traits was unique However, Allport had no scientific evidence of his theory › But, behavioral geneticists have found support for the heritability of personality traits Raymond Cattell attempted to create a more compact way of defining personality (Allports 200 traits were a bit much) Defined two types of traits › Surface traits – aspects of personality that can easily be seen by other people in the outward actions of a person › Source traits - the more basic traits that underlie the surface traits, forming the core of personality › Ex. Shyness, being quiet, and disliking crowds might all be surface traits related to the more basic source trait of introversion – a tendency to withdraw from excessive stimulation Cattell identified 16 source traits (even though he later determined that there may be as many as 23) He developed his The Sixteen Personality Factor (16PF) Questionnaire to assess individuals on these 16 source traits These 16 source traits are seen as trait dimensions, or continuums › In which there are 2 opposite traits at each end with a range of possible degrees for each trait measureable along the dimension Ex. Reserved/outgoing dimension › Andy is more reserved than Tina RESERVED OUTGOING After Catell, researchers attempted to reduce the number of trait dimensions to a more manageable number › Five-factor model or Big Five – model of personality traits that describes five basic trait dimensions › Several groups of researchers arrived at more or less the same five trait dimensions The Big Five represent the core description of human personality – the only dimensions necessary to understand what makes us tick Big Five (OCEAN) Openness – a person’s willingness to try new things and be open to new experiences › Conscientiousness – the care a person gives to organization and thoughtfulness of others; dependability, punctuality › Extraversion – one’s need to be with other people › Extraverts – people who are outgoing and sociable Introverts – people who prefer solitude and dislike being the center of attention Agreeableness – the emotional style of a person that may range from easygoing, friendly, and likeable to grumpy, crabby, and unpleasant › Neuroticism – degree of emotional instability › The Big Five Factor (OCEAN) High Scorer Characteristics Low Scorer Characteristics Opennes (O) Creative, artistic, curious, imaginative, nonconforming Conventional, down-toearth, uncreative Conscientiousness (C) Organized, reliable, neat, ambitious Unreliable, lazy, careless, negligent, spontaneous Extraversion (E) Talkative, optimistic, sociable, affectionate Reserved, comfortable being alone, stays in the background Agreeableness (A) Good-natured, trusting, helpful Rude, uncooperative, irritable, aggressive, competitive Neuroticism (N) Worrying, insecure, anxious, temperamental Calm, secure, relaxed, stable Costa & McCrae proposed that these five traits are not interdependent That knowing someone’s score on extraversion would not give any information about scores on the other four dimensions › Allows for a tremendous amount of variety in personality descriptions › More recently Michael C. Ashton and Kibeom Lee have extended the five factor model to include a 6th dimension 6th dimension: Honesty/Humility factor › H-factor High: sincere, honest, faithful, loyal, modest Avoid manipulating others, feel little temptation to break rules, not concerned with lavish wealth, feel no entitlement to higher social status Low: sly, deceitful, greedy, pretentious, hypocritical, boastful, pompous Flatter others to get what they want, inclined to break rules for personal gain, feel a strong sense of selfimportance Some theorists have cautioned that personality traits will not always be expressed in the same way across different situations Trait-situation interaction – the assumption that the particular circumstances of any given situation will influence the way in which a trait is expressed › Ex. An outgoing extravert might laugh, talk to strangers, and tell jokes at a party › That same person, if at a funeral, would still talk and be open, but the jokes and laughter would be less likely to occur (so environment/context matters) The five-factor model provides a dimensional approach to classifying personality structure › Which, today, is the widely accepted way of describing personality, as well as personality disorders (ex. Narcissistic Personality Disorder, NPD) Research, including cross-cultural studies, support the existence of the Big Five trait dimensions, which raises questions: Are child-rearing practices across all cultures similar enough to result in these five aspects of personality? › Or, could these five dimensions have a genetic component that transcends cultural differences? › Behavioral genetics – field of study devoted to discovering the genetic basis for personality differences › The study of just how much of an individual’s personality is due to inherited traits Animal breeders have known for a long time that selective breeding of certain animals with desirable traits can produce changes in physical characteristics as well as temperament › Temperament consists of the characteristics each person is born with and is, therefore, determined by biology to a high degree If the temperaments of animals can be influenced by manipulating patterns of genetic inheritance Then its only a small step to assume that at least those personality characteristics related to temperament in human beings may also be influenced by heredity But, those who study animals can control the mating of certain animals and the conditions under which those animals are raised Human researchers cannot ethically or practically develop that degree of control and must study the accidental “experiments” of nature and opportunity (i.e. studies that follow twins and adopted persons) The difference between monozygotic (identical) and dizygotic (fraternal) twins provides a way to study the genetics of personality Identical twins share 100% of their genetic material (having come from 1 fertilized egg and 1 sperm) › Fraternal twins share only about 50% of their genetic material, like any pair of siblings would By comparing identical twins to fraternal twins, especially when twins can be found who were not raised in the same environment, researchers can begin to find evidence of possible genetic influences on various personality traits The Minnesota twin study is the largest study of twins in the U.S. › Has revealed that identical twins are more similar than fraternal twins or unrelated people in intelligence, leadership abilities, the tendency to follow rules, and the tendency to uphold traditional cultural expectations (nurturance, empathy, assertiveness, and aggression) This similarity holds even if twins are raised in separate environments Correlation of Scores 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Identical twins Fraternal twins Studying adopted children and their adoptive and birth families › Studying unrelated siblings who are raised in the same environment and their unrelated parents should help discover the influence of environment › By comparing adopted children to their adoptive families and if possible their biological families can help uncover some of the shared and nonshared environmental and genetic influences on personality Adoption studies have confirmed what twin studies have shown: Genetic influences account for a great deal of personality development, regardless of shared or nonshared environments › Through adoption studies a genetic basis has been suggested for shyness and aggressiveness Several studies have found that the big five personality factors have nearly a 50% rate of heritability across several cultures Studies seem to indicate that variations in personality traits are about 25%-50% inherited › Which means that environmental influences apparently account for about 50% of the variation in personality traits as well The methods for measuring or assessing personality vary according to the theory of personality used to develop those methods However, most psychological professionals doing a personality assessment on a client take a more eclectic view of personality › Which is a way of choosing the parts of different theories that seem to best fit a particular situation, rather than using only one theory to explain a phenomenon › Looking at behavior from all four perspectives can often bring insights into a person’s behavior that would not easily come from taking only one perspective › Ex. Using the humanistic perspective could shed light onto reasons why a person behaves the way they do, while the trait perspective can help one understand the person’s current personality Many professionals will also use several types of assessment techniques Personality assessments differ in the purposes for which they are conducted › Sometimes a researcher may administer a personality test of some sort to participants in a research study so that the participants may be classified according to certain personality traits Like studying the reactive tendencies of individuals high and low in neuroticism › There are also tests available to people who simply want to learn more about their own personalities http://www.outofservice.com/bigfive/ › Clinical and counseling psychologists, psychiatrists, and other psychological professionals use these personality assessment tools in the diagnosis of disorders of personality Interview – method of personality assessment in which the professional asks questions of the client and allows the client to answer, either in a structured or unstructured fashion › Survey type process and is likely to flow naturally from the beginning dialog between the client and the psychologist Problems with interviews › Obviously, clients can lie, distort the truth, misremember, or give what they think is a socially acceptable answer instead of true information › Interviewers themselves can be biased, interpreting what the client says in light of their own belief systems or prejudices › Halo effect – tendency of an interviewer to allow positive characteristics of a client to influence the assessments of the client’s behavior and statements Involves the interviewers tendency to form a favorable or unfavorable impression of someone at the first meeting Psychoanalysts have a goal in dealing with clients that other personality theorists do not share: Uncovering the unconscious conflicts, desires, and urges that affect the client’s conscious behavior › No other theorist assigns such importance to the unconscious mind, so psychoanalysts use assessment methods that are meant to “get at” those unconscious, hidden emotions and events Projection – defense mechanism involving placing, or “projecting,” one’s own unacceptable thoughts onto others, as if the thoughts actually belonged to those others and not to oneself › What if a person could project unacceptable, unconscious thoughts onto some harmless, ambiguous stimulus, like a picture? › Ex. A cloud is an ambiguous stimulus, people can interpret a cloud as looking like different things, even though the real cloud is neither of those things, it is capable of being interpreted in more than one way Just like viewing a cloud, psychoanalysts show their clients ambiguous visual stimuli and ask the clients to tell them what they see › The hope is that the client will project those unconscious concerns and fears onto the visual stimulus, revealing them to the analyst These methods are called projective tests › Personality assessments that present ambiguous visual stimuli to the client and ask the client to respond with what ever comes to mind One of the more well-known projective tests is the Rorschach inkblot test, developed in 1921 by Hermann Rorschach › Uses 10 inkblots as the ambiguous stimuli › 5 in black on a white background and 5 in colored inks on a white background People being tested are asked to look at each inkblot and simply say whatever it might look like to them Using predetermined categories and responses commonly given by people to each picture, psychologists score responses on key factors › Such as reference to color, shape, figures seen in the blot, and response to the whole or details Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) › Uses 20 black and white pictures of people in ambiguous situations as the visual stimuli › Pictures are shown to a client who is then asked to tell a story about the person or people in the picture The story developed by the client is interpreted by the psychoanalyst, who looks for revealing statements and projection of the client’s own problems onto the people in the pictures Projective tests are by their nature very subjective › Interpreting client’s answers is almost an art › Certainly not a science and is not known for accuracy › Reliability is the tendency of a test to give the same score every time it is administered to the same person or group of people Validity is the ability of a test to measure what it is intended to measure Problems lie in the areas of reliability and validity › Projective tests, with no standard grading scales, have both low reliability and validity › Referring to concepts and impressions that are only valid within a particular person’s perception and may be influenced by biases, prejudice, and personal experiences Ex. A person’s answers to a Rorschach might be quite different from one day to the next, depending on the person’s mood and what scary movie might have been on TV the night before However, many practicing clinical psychologists and psychiatrists still use this type of testing › › Some believe that the latest versions of these tests and other like them still have practical use, especially when used as a starting point for diving deeper into a client’s issues However, more reliable and objective measures are available Behaviorists typically don’t want to “look into the mind.” › Because behaviorists assume that personality is merely habitually learned responses to stimuli in the environment, they prefer to watch and assess behavior as it occurs in the real world Direct observation – the professional observes the client engaged in ordinary, day-to-day behavior in either a clinical or natural setting › Ex. A therapist observes a child’s behavior in his classroom and recognizes that he only throws tantrums when he is asked to do something involving fine motor abilities (like drawing or writing). The therapist might conclude that the child has problems with fine motor skills and throws tantrums to avoid dong those tasks Rating scale – a numerical value is assigned to specific behavior that is listed in the scale › Ex. A therapist who is observing an aggressive child might assign lower numbers to less severe aggressive behaviors like taking another child’s toy and higher numbers to more severe behaviors such as physical assault on another child Frequency count – the frequency of a particular behavior is counted › Ex. A therapist observing a child with ADHD might count the number of times the child is caught day dreaming in class, speaking out of turn, or goes off-topic in class Rating scales and frequency counts are both used by educators to diagnose behavioral problems such as ADHD and aspects of personality such as social-skill level The observer effect: when a person’s behavior is affected by knowing he/she is being watched Observer bias: when the observer’s own personal thoughts and feelings affect the documenting of behavior Both observer effect and observer bias can be controlled for by having multiple observers and correlating their observations with each other As with any kind of observational method, there is no control over the external environment There is no guarantee that the target behavior will occur within the observation time › Like when a problem with your car never seems to show up when the mechanic is examining the car Personality inventory – paper and pencil or computerized test that consists of statements that require a specific, standardized response from the person taking the test › These questionnaires have a standard list of questions and only require certain specific answers, like “yes,” “no,” or “can’t decide” Personality inventories are more standardized, reliable, and objective than projective tests › Everyone gets the same list of questions (standardized) and there are no open-ended questions Ex. Cattell’s 16PF, Costa and McCrae Neuroticism/Extraversion/Openness Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) which is based on the five-factor model A common inventory is the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), it is based on Carl Jung’s ideas and looks at 4 personality dimensions › Sensing/intuition (S/I) Sensing includes people who prefer to rely on what they can see, hear, etc. through their physical senses, these individuals are very detail oriented and prefer to work only with known facts Intuition includes individuals who look for patterns and trust their hunches, these individuals are more willing to use metaphors, analogies, and look for possibilities › Thinking/feeling (T/F) Thinking includes individuals who prefer to use logic, analysis, and experiences that can be verified as facts Feeling includes individuals who tend to make decisions based on their personal values and emotional reaction › Introversion/Extraversion (I/E) Introversion includes individuals who are more solitary and avoid being the center or attention Extraversion includes individuals who are talkative, out going, and sociable › Perceiving/Judging (P/J) Perceiving includes individuals who are willing to adapt and modify decisions, be spontaneous, and who are naturally curious and tend to put off making a final decision until all the possibilities are covered Judging includes individuals who action-oriented, decisive, get-the-task-done-and-don’t-look-back type The 4 dimensions can differ for each individual, resulting in 16 (4x4) possible personality types: ISTJ, ISTP, ISFP, ISFJ, and so on Meyer-Briggs s often used to assess personality to help people know the kinds of careers they are best suited for Ex. A person who scored high on the extravert, sensing, thinking, and judging dimensions would be an ESTJ. › A typical description of this personality type would be a person who needs to analyze information and bring order to the outer world › These individuals are organizers, energetic in completing tasks, and practical and they also take their responsibilities seriously and expect others to do so as well › School administrators, for example, are often ESTJs By far the most common personality inventory is the Minnesota Multi-Phasic Personality Inventory, Version II, or MMPI-2 › Specifically tests for abnormal behavior patterns in personality › Consists of 567 statements such as “I am often very tense” or “I believe I am being plotted against” Individuals must answer “true,” “false,” or “cannot say.” › Includes 10 clinical scales and 8 validity scales, as well as numerous subscales › Each scale tests for a particular kind of behavior Behavior patterns include relatively mild personality problems such as excessive worrying and shyness as well as more serious disorders such as schizophrenia and depression Validity scales are built into any well-designed psychological inventory › They are intended to indicate whether or not a person taking the inventory is responding honestly › Responses to certain items on the test will indicated if people are trying to make themselves look better or worse than they are › Certain items are repeated throughout the test in a slightly different form, so that anyone trying to “fake” the test will have difficulty responding to those items consistently › Ex. If one of the statements is “I am always happy” and a person responds “true” there would be suspicion that the person is trying to look better that he or she really is. This item would be repeated later in a different form such as “I am never sad” The advantage of personality inventories over projective tests and interviews is that inventories are standardized › Everyone gets exactly the same questions and the answers are scored in exactly the same way › In fact, responses are often scored on computers Observer bias and bias of interpretation are not possible because this kind of assessment is objective rather than subjective The validity and reliability of personality inventories are generally recognized as being greatly superior to those of projective tests There are some problems though › The validity scales are a good check against cheating, but they are not perfect Some people are still able to fake their answers and respond in what they feel are the socially appropriate ways › Individual responses to specific questions may also vary because they may be interpreted in different ways by different individuals, and are likely to be subject to cultural differences › Another problem is human nature itself: some people may develop a habit of picking a particular answer rather than carefully considering the statement Others may simply grow tired of responding to all the statements and start picking answers at random