Hipertensión Arterial en el paciente Diabético Consideraciones en el Manejo Clínico Carlos Chiurchiu cchiurchiu@hospitalprivadosa.com.ar Servicio de Nefrología y Programa de Trasplantes Renales Hospital Privado - Centro Médico de Córdoba 21-11-2008 1 PREVALENCIA DE HIPERTENSIÓN EN INDIOS LATINOAMERICANOS 30.0 27.0 Tobas: población urbana Aymara: población rural Yanomamo: población de la foresta/selva 15.0 6.4 0.0 0 Tobas (Argentina) Aymara (Chile) Yanomamo (Brasil) Mancilha J et al. J Hum Hypertens 1989 Perez F et al. Rev Med Chil 1999 Bianchi M et al. XIII Latin American Congress of Nephrology and Hypertension 2004 2 Edad e Hipertensión Arterial en Argentina > 140/90 3 Prevalence of hypertension in newly presenting type 2 diabetic patients p=0.001 70 5.0 61 % 60 50 % 39 % 40 30 Rate of CV events before 2.5 diagnosis of diabetes (%) 0 < 160/90 160/90 20 10 0 < 160/90 160/90 Hypertension in Diabetic Study J Hyperten 11:309–317 1993 Rol del riñón en el mantenimiento de la HTA crónica Hall J. Hypertension 2003 5 Increased renal sodium reabsorption and hypertension in obesity < 6 g salt/day (2,3 g / Na o 100 mmol/ Na) Hall J. Hypertension. 2003 6 Objetivos de Presión Arterial en el paciente Diabético 7 INDICATIONS FOR INITIAL TREATMENT AND GOALS FOR ADULT HYPERTENSIVE DIABETIC PATIENTS Systolic Goal (mmHg) Diastolic < 130 < 80 Behavioral therapy alone (maximum 3 months) then add pharmacologic treatment 130-139 80-89 Behavioral therapy + pharmacologic treatment 140 90 American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care 2008 8 The risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in diabetes is strongly associated with blood pressure UKPDS (36): BMJ 2000;321:412-419 9 Rate of major cardiovascular events according to Diastolic Blood Pressure DBP Goal < 90 Rate/1000 person/year 25 – < 85 25 – < 80 20 – 15 – 20 – P <0.5 for trend 15 – 10 – 10 – 5 – 5 – 0 – 0 – All patients n: 18790 P <0.005 for trend Diabetic HOT Study: Lancet 1998 n: 1501 10 CASO CLINICO I •Mujer de 19 años, estudiante de medicina (cursillo) •Diabética tipo 1 (5 años de diagnóstico) •Sobrepeso (BMI: 27.5), sedentaria, come salado •F de Ojos: normal •Insulinoterapia (Hb glic: 8.2%) •PA: 135/85 (idem en 2 consultas previas) refiere PA domiciliaria de 110/70 no usa hipotensores •Creatinina: 0.45 mg/dl •Albuminuria: 14 mg/g •K: 4.8 mEq/l 11 La PA nocturna predice el desarrollo de microalbuminuria en DBT tipo 1 normotensos 12 - 530 type 1 diabetes - Normotensive - 86%: Normoalbum. 3 mmHg diferencia PA Idem Hb glicosilada The Lancet 1997 13 ¿Qué pueden aportar las medidas higiénico-dietéticas para lograr los objetivos de Presión Arterial en el paciente Diabético ? 14 Beneficios en la PA con dieta Hiposódica y alto contenido de Frutas y Vegetales (K+) Sodio: Alta: 150 mmol/d Media: 100 mmol/d Baja: 50 mmol/d Sacks F, et al. N Engl J Med 2001 15 Rol atribuible al sobrepeso y obesidad en los factores de riesgo y eventos cardiovasculares: Framingham Study Wilson P, et al. Arch Intern Med 2002 16 Influence of Weight Reduction on Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials A net weight reduction of 5.1 kg Neter J, et al. Hypertension 2003 17 ¿ 130 / 80 ? 18 The decrease in risk for each 10 mm Hg reduction of SBP for macro and microvascular complications UKPDS (36): BMJ 2000;321:412-419 19 Isquemia Miocárdica e HTA Prospective Studies Collaboration, Lancet 2002 20 Stroke e HTA Prospective Studies Collaboration, Lancet 2002 21 MAP (mmHg) 95 98 101 104 107 110 113 116 119 0 r = 0.69; p < 0.05 GFR (ml/min/year) -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 130/85 140/90 Diabetes Parving et al., Br Med J, 1989 Viberti et al., JAMA, 1993 Hebert et al., Kidney Int, 1994 Lebovitz et al., Kidney Int, 1994 Bakris et al., Kidney Int, 1996 Bakris et al., Hypertension, 1997 Untreated HTN Non-diabetes Klahr et al., N Engl J Med, 1993 Maschio et al., N Engl J Med, 1996 GISEN Group, Lancet, 1997 Bakris et al., Am J Kidney Dis, 2000 22 CASO CLINICO II Varón 58 años, comerciante Diabético tipo 2 (>15 años de diagnóstico) Obeso (BMI: 31), fumador, come salado F de Ojos: RD (no prolif.) HVI Edemas en tobillos ++ PA: 155/95 Creatinina: 1.35 mg/dl (MDRD: 58 ml/min) Albuminuria: 200 mg/g K: 5.0 mEq/l LDL: 160 mg/dl Hb glicosilada: 9.1 % Med: Amlodipina 10 mg/d, ADO, AAS, Atorvastatina 10 23 ¿Qué beneficios aportaría reducir la PA a este paciente? 24 EFFECTS OF CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKADE IN OLDER PATIENTS WITH DIABETES AND SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION Syst-Eur trial (Post-hoc analysis) 492 patients 60 years or older Placebo vs Nitrendipine 2 years follow up Initial BP: 175 / 85 BP fall: Placebo 14 / 3 BP fall: Nitrendipine 22 / 7 Tuomilheto J, et al. N Engl J Med 1999 25 ¿ Todos los hipotensores le darían iguales beneficios? 26 ACE inhibitors versus dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in diabetic patients 12 Nisoldipine Amlodipine 16 9 12 % 6 % 8 Fosinopril Enalapril 3 4 0 0 ABCD trial FACET trial 470 Hipertensive patients 5 years follow up MI: secondary end point 380 Hipertensive patients 3.5 years follow up Combined End Point: MI, stroke, angina 27 DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF 21 MONTHS OF CCBs THERAPY IN TYPE 2 DIABETICS WITH NEPHROPATHY Nifedipine (n = 10) Diltiazem (n = 11) 10 0 DSBP DDBP 100 D 24 h proteinuira 0 -10 -100 -20 -200 -30 -300 -40 -400 -50 -500 Smith et al., Kidney Int, 1998 28 CAPPP study: ACE inhibitor therapy associated with reduction in endpoints : Diabetic vs Total population Hansson L , et al. Lancet 1999 29 EFFECTS ON RAMIPRIL ON CARDIOVASCULAR AND MICROVASCULAR OUTCOMES IN 3.577 PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES ENROLLED IN THE HOPE STUDY THE MICRO-HOPE STUDY - age > 55 years - no clinical proteinuria - previous cardiovascular event or at least one other cardiovascular risk factor HOPE Study Investigators, Lancet, 2002 30 THE MICROHOPE STUDY Clinical outcomes for Ramipril and placebo group Relative Risk (95% CI) Primary outcomes Combined Myocardial infarction Stroke Cardiovascular death Secondary outcomes Total mortality Revascularization Overt nephropathy - 50% - 25% 0 25% HOPE Study Investigators, Lancet, 2002 31 THE DREAM STUDY - 5269 participants without cardiovascular disease - Impaired fasting glucose levels or impaired glucose tolerance - Treatment: ramipril (up to 15 mg per day) or placebo - Follow up: 3 years (median) - Baseline BP: 136/83 (both groups) DREAM Trial Group, NEJM 2006 32 ATENOLOL AND CAPTOPRIL IN REDUCING RISK OF MACRO AND MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS: UKPDS 39 - 1148 hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients Myocardial infarction, sudden death, stroke, peripheral vascular disease and renal failure -Less tight BP control: 154/87 -Captopril: 144/83 -Atenolol: 143/81 UKPDS (39) BMJ, 1998 33 Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): Inclusion criteria - Diabetes (both types) - Hypertension SBP: 160 - 200 mmHg and/or DBP: 95 - 115 mmHg - Left ventricular hypertrophy Design - Randomized, double blind Treatment - Losartan (50 - 100 mg/day) n = 586 - Atenolol (50 - 100 mg/day) n = 609 Follow-up - 4.7 ± 1.1 years Main end point - Combined cardiovascular mortality, stroke, miocardial infarction Lindholm et al., Lancet, 2002 34 Blood pressure and metabolic control were comparable in the two treatment groups throughout the whole study period Lingholm et al., Lancet, 2002 35 THE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE TREATMENT TO PREVENT (ALLHAT) n = 33,357 AND LIPID-LOWERING HEART ATTACK TRIAL Patients Age > 55 years At least 1 risk factor Design Randomized, double blind Treatment* Chlortalidone 12,5 – 25 mg/day Amlodipine 2,5 – 10 mg/day Lisinopril 10 – 40 mg/day Follow-up 4 – 8 years Primary end-point Major (fatal and non fatal) cardiovascular events * The doxazosin arm was prematurely interrupted because of the significantly worse outcome as compared to the diuretic arm ALLHAT Group, JAMA 200236 ALLHAT Study: Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Diabetes Mellitus Normoglycemia Coronary Heart Disease Coronary Heart Disease All-Cause Mortality All-Cause Mortality Combined CHD Combined CHD Stroke Stroke Heart Failure Heart Failure Combined CVD Combined CVD ESRD ESRD Favors Lisinopril 0.5 Favors Chlortalidone 1 2 Favors Lisinopril 0.5 Favors Chlortalidone 1 2 Whelton P et al., Arch Intern Med. 2005 37 THE ALLHAT STUDY 150 Mean Systolic Blood Pressure * mmHg 145 * 140 * * * * * 135 Lisinopril Chlorthalidone * p < 0.0001 130 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years Throughout the whole study period, systolic blood pressure was significantly lower (2 mmHg) with chlorthalidone than with lisinopril ALLHAT Group, JAMA 2002 38 Número de drogas usadas por paciente para lograr los objetivos de PA en diversos estudios 39 Asociar IECAs con ARAII Beneficios sobre la PA? Beneficios en el riesgo CV ? Beneficios en la nefropatía ? 40 41 CANDESARTAN AND LISINOPRIL MICROALBUMINURIA (CALM) STUDY Adjusted risk reduction (at 24 weeks) in SBP, DBP, and urinary A/C ratio in 197 type 2 diabetics with hypertension and microalbuminuria D SBP D DBP (mmHg) (mmHg) D urinary A/C ratio (%) mg/day Candesartan 16 n = 66 Lisinopril n = 64 20 Combination 16 + 20 n = 67 1 10 20 30 40 50 1 10 20 30 40 50 1 10 20 30 40 50 60 Mogensen et al., Br Med J, 2000 42 ADDITIVE EFFECT OF ACE INHIBITION AND ANGIOTENSIN II RECEPTOR BLOCKADE mmHg - Crossover study -Type 1 DM Blood Pressure 150 100 -Overt nephropathy 50 -Treatment: 0 Placebo Placebo 1000 mg/24 hs Valsartan Combination Albuminuria Benazepril 20 mg/day Valsartan 80 mg/day Benazepril 500 Combination (full doses) 0 Jacobsen et. al. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003 Placebo Benazepril Valsartan Combination 43 Comparison between the cardiovascular risk reduction between tight glucose control vs tight BP control Stroke DM death Any diabetic endpoint Microvascular Complications 0 -10 -20 % * -30 * -40 -50 * Tight glucose control * * p<0.05 Tight BP control UKPDS 38. BMJ, 1998 44