How Math Can Help You Choose the Right College Dr. Geoff Turner What Today’s Talk WON’T Do Sadly, I can’t tell you what your ideal college is. Nor can I provide an algorithm for finding your ideal college. (But then again, no one can.) Not how psychologists typically use math. What Today’s Talk Will (Hopefully) Do • Let you know how psychologists make decisions and think about how people make decisions (using math) • Suggest ideas to help you in your search for a college • Available on the web – web.simmons.edu/~turnerg/choice/choice.ppt Math in Psychology Statistical significance: A difference is not always a difference! Math in Psychology Statistical significance: A difference is not always a difference! Significant Differences Significant Differences 22.00 20.00 18.00 16.00 15.46 14.00 15.46 14.01 14.01 12.00 10.00 0 1 2 3 4 Significant Differences Significant Differences 22.00 20.00 18.00 16.00 15.46 14.00 15.46 14.01 14.01 12.00 10.00 0 1 2 3 4 Detecting Deception Do “lie detectors” really work? Polygraph Test It works! Polygraph Test Oops! How Psychologists Judge Differences The Mathematical Models æ æ öö ç 1 ç 2d x¢ d ¢y ÷÷ - Co ÷ ÷ H = P(“old”|Old) = Fç ç ÷÷ ç t ç d x¢ 2 + d ¢y 2 è øø è F = P(“old”|New)= F(- Co ) æ d¢2 - d¢ 2 ö ç x ÷ y RF =P(“remember”|New) = F(- Co )Fç + Cr ÷ ç d x¢ 2 + d ¢y 2 ÷ è ø æ æ öö ç 1 ç 2d x¢ d ¢y ÷÷ æ C ö - C o ÷ ÷F ç r ÷ RH = P(“remember”|Old) = Fç ç ÷÷ è t ø ç t ç d x¢ 2 + d ¢y 2 øø è è Choices, Choices 1. People don’t like choosing (deciding) 2. People have surprisingly little insight into their own thought processes. 3. People’s choices are remarkably inconsistent over time, even under apparently identical conditions. 4. Frequently, our choices are not optimal. They’re irrational. What’s for dinner? If offered the choice between beef and chicken, you might choose beef. Beef ≻ Chicken What’s for dinner? If offered the choice between chicken and fish, you might choose chicken. Chicken ≻ Fish What’s for dinner? If offered the choice between fish and beef, then, of course you would choose … Beef Fish ? Fish Beef ? What’s for dinner? How is this possible? • Beef ≻ Chicken • Chicken ≻ Fish • Fish ≻ Beef Problem with Decision Models Intransitivity (the paper, rock, scissors problem) The transitive property If a > b, and b > c, then a > c but… Back to Dinner 1 decision, but 2 dimensions • Beef ≻ Chicken (Taste) • Chicken ≻ Fish (Taste) • Fish ≻ Beef (Health) Two Dimensions 25 Beef Taste 20 Chicken 15 10 5 Fish 0 0 5 10 15 Health Transitivity Within Dimension 20 25 Same Potential Issue With College Choice • Simmons ≻ BU • BU ≻ Northeastern • Northeastern ≻ Simmons Most Real-World Decisions Are Like This What Can We Do? (besides flip a coin) Multi-Dimensional Scaling Discover relationships from comparisons: LA-NY > LA-Denver LA-Atlanta > Seattle-SF Multi-Dimensional Scaling QuickTime™ and a TIFF (LZW) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Repertory Grid (Kelly, 1955) • Gather a set of schools you think you might be interested in • Enumerate all possible triples # Schools 3 4 5 6 # Triples 1 3 6 10 Next • Split each triple based on “feel” or intuition whatever comes naturally. • Define the way members of the pair are similar (and why they make a pair) and how the third is different. • Example: BU, Simmons, Northeastern BU, NEU vs Simmons Large vs. Small Repertory Grid (Kelly, 1955) Construct a matrix of comparisons: BU Wheelock Simmons Harvard NEU Size: Large vs Small 1 Co-ed vs. women 0 0 1 0 0 Focus: Research vs Teaching 1 0 0 1 1 Faculty: Brilliant vs Ordinary 0 0 1 1 0 Good food vs. bad 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 Repertory Grid (Kelly, 1955) Construct a matrix of comparisons: BU Wheelock Simmons Harvard NEU Size: Large vs Small 1 0 0 1 1 Co-ed vs. women 0 0 1 0 0 Focus: Research vs Teaching 1 0 0 1 1 Faculty: Brilliant vs Ordinary 0 0 1 1 0 Good food vs. bad 0 0 1 1 1 Repertory Grid (Kelly, 1955) • Sort the Matrix by Element (School) putting similar together BU NEU Harvard Wheelock Simmons Size: Large vs Small 1 1 1 0 0 Co-ed vs. women 0 0 0 0 1 Focus: Research vs Teaching 1 1 1 0 0 Faculty: Brilliant vs Ordinary 0 0 1 0 1 Good food vs. bad 0 1 1 0 1 Repertory Grid (Kelly, 1955) • Sort the Matrix by Construct (Attribute) putting similar together BU NEU Harvard Wheelock Simmons Size: Large vs Small 1 1 1 0 0 Focus: Research vs Teaching 1 1 1 0 0 Co-ed vs. women 0 0 0 0 1 Faculty: Brilliant vs Ordinary 0 0 1 0 1 Good food vs. bad 0 1 1 0 1 Results BU NEU Harvard Wheelock Simmons Size: Large vs Small 1 1 1 0 0 Focus: Research vs Teaching 1 1 1 0 0 Co-Ed vs. Women 1 0 0 1 1 Faculty: Brilliant vs Ordinary 0 0 1 0 1 Good food vs bad 0 1 1 0 1 • BU and NEU are nearly identical; further examination may be necessary. • Size and Research are equated - should they be or is this a bias? Double counting this influence? • Which constructs are most important to you? What College Is Best For You? What College Is Best For You? Simmons!