Design of UAV Systems Lesson objective - to review Basic aerodynamics relationships ….the minimum level of fidelity required for pre-concept and conceptual design assessments of subsonic UAVs Expectations - You will understand how to apply the basics and to avoid unnecessary detail c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics 16-1 Design of UAV Systems Importance These are the fundamental aerodynamic relationships needed to define a subsonic air vehicle for a UAV system c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics 16-2 Forces and geometry Design of UAV Systems Side view Ai = Inlet area Svt = Exposed VT area V Swet = Total wetted area excluding inlet and nozzle area Swet-x = Wetted area of x L = lift horizon D = Drag = Flight path angle W = weight T = Thrust Sref = Wing reference area (both sides to CL) cg = center of gravity Anoz = Nozzle area Ct Cr = Root chord Swexp = Exposed wing area (both sides) Cmac = Mean aerodynamic chord c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics Sht = Exposed HT area Cr Cr 16-3 Design of UAV Systems Aerodynamic lift Lift (L) = ClqSref = ClqSref (16.1) where… Cl = lift curve slope (theoretrical = 2/rad; see RayAD Eq 12.6 for more exact formulation) = angle of attack Sref = aerodynamic reference area and… Dynamic pressure (q) = (/2)V^2 (16.2) where… = air density (lb-sec^2/ft^4) V = airspeed (ft/sec) For uncambered airfoils Cl = 0 at = 0 V c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics 16-4 Design of UAV Systems Aerodynamic drag Drag (D) = CdqSref (16.3) where… Cd = drag coefficient = Cdmin+Cdi = Cdmin+k[Cl-Clmin]^2 (16.4) and … For uncambered k = 1/[Ae] airfoil Cdmin = Cd0 A = Aspect ratio = b^2/Sref e = Oswold wing efficiency = f(,A) = sweep Cdmin = CfKd(Swet/Sref) = Cfe(Swet/Sref) (16.5) where… Cf = flat plate skin friction coefficient (See RayAD Fig 12.21) Kd 1.2 = Factor to account for non-friction drag items such as pressure and interference) Cfe = Equivalent skin friction coefficient (RayAD12.3) •These relationships are for “untrimmed” drag polars, good aerodynamic design will minimize trim drag impact (which we will ignore for now) c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics 16-5 Design of UAV Systems Oswold efficiency factor Source - Lee Nicolai, Conceptual Design Process, LM Aero c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics 16-6 Lift and drag - cont’d Design of UAV Systems Notional Lift Characteristics 1.4 Nominal Drag Characteristics (uncambered airfoil) Clmax 1.2 1.2 slope = Cl 1 Max slope = L/Dmax 1 0.8 0.8 Cdmin 0.6 0.6 High AR, low sweep 0.4 Lower AR and/or higher sweep 0.2 CL@ L/Dmax 0.4 0.2 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 CD Alpha (deg) • CL and Cdmin are approximately constant for lowto-medium subsonic speed range (below drag rise) • This simplifying assumption makes our aero analysis task really easy (and reasonably correct) c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics 16-7 Design of UAV Systems L/D max - another perspective Theoretical (L/D)max • If Cd = Cd0 + KCl^2 then D/L = Cd0/Cl + KCl) and (L/D) max will occur when d(D/L)/dCl = 0 or…. - Cd0/Cl^2 + K = 0 or Cd0 = KCl^2 = Cdi (L/D)max @ Minimum drag Cdmin = Cdi c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics 16-8 Design of UAV Systems L/D cont’d Since (L/D)max occurs when Cd = 2Cd0 ≈ 2Cfe(Swet/Sref) (16.6) then….. Cl = sqrt (AReCdo) (16.7) and…. (L/D)max = sqrt((e/Cfe)(b^2/Swet))/2 (16.8) For typical aircraft Cfe = .003 - .005 (Table 12.3), e ≈ 0.8, Kd = 1.2 (L/D)max ≈ 11.2-14.5sqrt (b^2/Swet) (16.9) Compare this to RayAD Figure 3.6 Airspeed at (L/D)max (aka LoDmax ) is calculated using equations 16.1 and 16.7 - At other conditions (where speed is given) q is calculated using Equation 16.2, Cl from16.1, Cd from 16.4 and 16.5 and L/D (aka LoD) from - L/D = Cl/Cd (16.10) c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics 16-9 Design of UAV Systems Example A subsonic UAV has the following characteristics W0/Sref = 40 psf AR = 20 = 0 deg Swet/Sref = 5 or b^2/Swet = 20/5 = 4 Cfe = .0035 From chart 16.6 at AR = 20 and = 0 deg, e ≈ 0.8 and Cd @ LoDmax ≈ 2Cfe(Swet/Sref) = .035 Cd0 = .0175 Cl @ LoDmax = sqrt (AReCdo) = 0.938 LoDmax = sqrt{[e/Cfe][AR/(Swet/Sref)]}/2 = 26.8 q @ LoDmax = (W0/Sref)/Cl = 42.6 psf EAS @ LoDmax = 112.2 KEAS c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics 16-10 Correction factors Design of UAV Systems (L/D)max For pre-concept studies, equations 16.1 - 16.5 will yield reasonable estimates of lift and drag • Nonetheless it is good practice to always compare estimates to data from similar aircraft and to apply appropriate correction factors • Our previous calculation LoDmax comparisons of LoDmax = 26.8 for AR 35 = 20, Swet/Sref = 5, for example, when compared 30 25 to parametric data from 20 other aircraft shows that Chart 16-10 15 estimate our estimate is consistent 10 with the parametric data 5 Manned aircraft Global Hawk (est) • If not we could correct the 0 estimate by putting a multiplier on Cdmin 0 2 4 Wetted AR = b^2/Swet 6 8 Manned aircraft data : LM Aero data handbook c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics 16-11 Design of UAV Systems More refined estimates For conceptual design studies, a component buildup method (see RayAD 13.5) will yield higher fidelity drag estimates and capture: • Reynolds number effects • Overall and for individual components • Form factor effects • Such as wing thickness • Interference drag effects • Miscellaneous drag contributions As we will see later, our pre-concept design spread sheet methods could also incorporate these higher fidelity methods with little additional work • They will be included at a later date A better approach for conceptual design, however, would be a combination of component build up for trade studies and Euler CFD for baseline analysis c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics 16-12 Design of UAV Systems Compressibility effects On subsonic UAVs we can ignore compressibility effects for lift and drag, but not for jet engine performance - The effects are estimated assuming a perfect gas, where specific heat ratio ( = 1.4) Pressure effect P/Pa = {1+[(-1)/2]M^2}^[/(-1)] = [1+0.2M^2]^3.5 (16.11) Temperature effect T/Ta = {1+[(-1)/2]M^2} = [1+0.2M^2] (16.12) where… P and T = Total (isentropic stagnation) pressure and temperature Pa and Ta = Static atmospheric pressure and temperature Example : M = 0.8; 36Kft (Pa = 472.6 psf; Ta = 390R) P/Pa = 1.52 or P = 720 psf (≈ 27Kft @ M=0) T/Ta = 1.13 or T = 440R = -19.8F (≈ 22Kft @ M=0) c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics 16-8 Design of UAV Systems c 2002 LM Corporation Aerodynamics Intermission 16-8