Largest community college system in Missouri serving an area of about 700 square miles; created by area voters in 1962
Four campuses, three education centers
Transfer, career and developmental programs
Non-credit continuing education courses
Various workforce development initiatives
A “League for Innovation” institution
26,000 credit students each semester
40,000 non-credit each year
31,000 workforce development students
130 credit programs
57 workforce development programs
1,800 faculty (420
)
3,500 employees
Issues and problems with old site
Developing a new brand identity for the institution
“One College”,
… but not a well defined identity on the web site
Site is difficult to navigate – and to find content – 16,000 pages with no standard navigation
Internal use content mixed in with other content
Pages did not follow best practices for web design
Most pages did not comply with our loosely defined college standards
Common to have over 2,000 broken links
Non-compliance with ADA requirements
Out-of-date and conflicting content
No unified appearance – brand identity was fragmented at best to almost non-existent
No workflow, editing or review process
Trying to represent the constant of the district-wide college while maintaining the uniqueness of each campus
Taking content from the existing 16,000 pages to distill the items of need to audiences
Meetings at each campus to introduce project and seek cooperation and support
2005 – Audience research conducted by contracted firm
• Current and prospective students – focus groups and online surveys
• Continuing Education and high school guidance counselors – focus groups
• Key administrators and faculty influencers – phone interviews
• Larger sample of faculty and staff – random, online survey
Registration
Hub for student news and communications
Access to all programs and classes
Class availability, times/room numbers, changes, grades
Do everything online:
• Pay for classes
• Get parking passes
• Get books
• “Not have to go to the campus”
Ervin Marketing Report, May 2006
84.7% - Registration
82.4% - Student Resources
81.8% - Class Schedules
77.9% - Blackboard
60.3% - College Catalog
29.9% - can’t find what they are looking for
Ervin Marketing Report, May 2006
The existing public website will be replaced in its entirety
The new website will focus on the needs of our external constituents and will incorporate the College’s new marketing, branding and image campaign
• Provide an informative, effective marketing tool
• Provide for the needs of current students
Align with the college strategic mission
To increase enrollment at the college
Simplify the experience for students
Management, faculty, staff and administrators given the ability to develop and update content to web-site
The contents of the new website will be developed by the outside vendor
A second vendor will take responsibility for building the initial Web site
The new web site will utilize the Serena
Collage web content management system to simplify the publishing process and enable a workflow driven web authoring environment
Rebrand the site to project STLCC as one college
Build a site that allows visitors to select a path based on personal needs
Create a new web content delivery system:
• Easy to update
• Reinforces web standards
• Provides a consistent user experience
• Flexible to respond to changing needs
Huge change in the culture of the way the website was maintained
Shifting responsibility from campus to
Community Relations and web coordinators
Web Authoring as a distributed responsibility
Identify person(s) responsible for web authorship
Taxonomy - (navigation, structure, organization)
• Ad Hoc Web Advisory Committee – played a big role
• Organized by function rather than content
Frequently accessed content on home page
• Without trying to include everything
‣ Automate consistency and standards through templates and required elements
‣ Rich text editing eliminates the need for
HTML or web editor experience
‣ Manage workflows with the combination of task management and a review/approval system
‣ Allow authorized users to easily add or update content “anytime, anywhere” through a browser
‣ Roll pages back to a previous version as needed
‣ Schedule content replacement or removal
SungardHE Banner (ERP) Self-Service
BlackBoard LMS
Home-grown applications
• Course Schedule
• Schedule of Late-Starting Courses
• Employee Directory
• Continuing Education Registration
• Student Application
• Sexual Harassment, FERPA, and Diversity Tutorials
New system – Windows Live student e-mail
‣ New website went live March 9, 2008:
‣ In order to have a go-live date, a “line” had to be drawn somewhere on what content would be part of the initial deployment
• We used the Ad Hoc Web Committee to develop basic guidelines for what was to be included for
Phase 1
• There are some whose content was left out that felt their content was too important to not be included
Representing a district-wide college (“One
College” brand) while presenting the uniqueness of each campus.
Underestimating timeline for content and technical development
Working with several different vendors
Focus can get sidetracked with input from concerned parties
New positions, new employees
Deploying new WCMS in conjunction with new site
Internal audiences – time it takes to communicate – delays caused by summer schedules
Managing expectations of new site –
Launched with 1,600 vs. 16,000 pages
“Phase 2” almost completed -
• Corrections and updates - Added over 1250 pages based on feedback and metrics analysis
• Development of interactive, more dynamic content
• WCMS contributor training
• Development of department and “academic discipline” pages
Implementation of enrollment management tools
• CRM
• Variable web content/print
Continue to add content that was not included in the first two phases that fit the objective of the new site
Revival of the Web Advisory Committee my.stlcc.edu
student portal- SharePoint
Blogs/Social networking
Continued focus on brand management
The overall goal of project of creating a usercentric website was achieved
The new website contributed to the goal of increase in enrollment
Phase I rolled out smoothly
National Council for Marketing and Public
Relations – Silver Award
The use of an outside consultant
• Provided confirmation and justification for taking on this huge project
• Justified funding for project
• Identified the need for dedicated positions
Active involvement of the faculty and staff
Use of outside vendors for web development
Good internal cooperation between technical and content
Integration of home grown apps successful
WCMS – edit, review and deploy functions went smoothly
Implementation of AP style
Setting a deadline and trying to stick to it forced us to make some tough decisions to meet that deadline
Outside vendor
• Web development team needed a lot of effort to get up to speed with our WCMS
• Vendor used for writing of content never really hit the mark
WCMS
• Issues integrating applications - vendor never got a handle on this
• User interface – edit function not as “friendly” as desirable – Many support calls from “occasional” user
• Task management is cumbersome and does not match our business processes
• Uncertain future of vendor support
• Required desktop settings not necessarily compatible with campus settings
In house team undermanned – made meeting deadlines very challenging
Content needs to be re-written in a more
“user friendly” style – easier to read
Better communication/feedback process with faculty and staff during development and subsequently
Faster implementation of additional/missing content
• Departments & academic disciplines
• Dynamic content
Hard coding of static information – outside vendor not familiar with internal resources for dynamic content
We had more hardware than was necessary –
ASP & ASP.NET integration with CMS not realized until after learning more about WCMS capability
Internal technical staff would have benefitted from earlier training
Identifying and training more content contributors earlier
The battle of the home page
• Next to the navigation, this was the biggest focus of discussion
• Too much ended up being included making the page very busy and, to many, unappealing
• Many links were represented by both buttons and text links
George Sackett
Web Content Supervisor gsackett@stlcc.edu
www.twitter.com/George gsackett@stlcc.edu
Presentation is available online at: http://www.stlcc.edu/presentations/