Chapter 6 Learning © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Chapter Preview Classical Conditioning Operant Conditioning Observational Learning Factors That Affect Learning Learning and Health and Wellness © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Types of Learning Learning …a systematic, relatively permanent change in behavior that occurs through experience Behaviorism Associative Learning/Conditioning Observational Learning © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Types of Learning © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Classical Conditioning: Terminology helps to explain involuntary behavior unconditioned stimulus (UCS) unconditioned response (UCR) neutral stimulus (NS) conditioned stimulus (CS) conditioned response (CR) © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Classical Conditioning: Procedure acquisition UCS produces a UCR (reflex) neutral stimulus (NS) paired with a UCS after pairings, NS produces a CR the NS has become a CS contiguity – time between CS and UCS contingency – is CS regularly followed by the UCS? © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Classical Conditioning: Pavlov Unlearned/Reflexive UCS – meat powder UCR – dog salivates NS – sound of Pavlov’s bell (prior to pairings with meat powder) Learned CS – sound of Pavlov’s bell CR – dog salivates © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Classical Conditioning: Pavlov © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Classical Conditioning Generalization CRs may appear after various NS that are similar to the CS Discrimination CRs appear after the CS but not after other CSs discrimination generally learned by presenting other CSs without the UCS © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Classical Conditioning Extinction Spontaneous Recovery CR is weakened by presenting the CS without the UCS Pavlov rang the bell but did not present food, and the dog stopped salivating CR recurs after a time delay and without additional learning when Pavlov rang the bell the next day, the dog salivated Renewal recovery of the CR when organism is placed in novel context © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Classical Conditioning © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Classical Conditioning: Applications Phobias Watson and Rayner (1920) – Little Albert white rat (CS) paired with loud noise (UCS) Counterconditioning associate CS with new, incompatible CR CS paired with new UCS aversive conditioning © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Classical Conditioning: Applications placebo effect immune and endocrine responses taste aversion advertising drug habituation © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Operant Conditioning better at explaining voluntary behaviors the consequences of a behavior change the probability of that behavior’s occurrence © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Operant Conditioning Thorndike’s Law of Effect consequence strengthens or weakens a S – R connection B.F. Skinner expanded on Thorndike’s work shaping (reward approximations of the desired behavior) © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Reinforcement Reinforcement increases behavior. Positive Reinforcement behavior followed by rewarding consequence rewarding stimulus is “added” Negative Reinforcement behavior followed by rewarding consequence aversive (unpleasant) stimulus is “removed” © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Reinforcement © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Principles of Reinforcement Avoidance Reinforcement …by making a particular response, a negative stimulus can be avoided Learned Helplessness …an organism learns it has no control over negative outcomes © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Types of Reinforcers Primary Reinforcers innately satisfying Secondary Reinforcers become satisfying through experience repeated association with a pre-existing reinforcer token economy © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Schedules of Reinforcement Generalization stimulus “sets the occasion” for the response responding occurs to similar stimuli Discrimination stimuli signal when behavior will or will not be reinforced Extinction and Spontaneous Recovery behavior decreases when reinforcement stops © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Schedules of Reinforcement Continuous Reinforcement Partial Reinforcement fixed variable ratio interval © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Schedules of Reinforcement Fixed Ratio (FR) reinforcement follows a set # of behaviors Variable Ratio (VR) reinforcement follows an unpredictable # of behaviors (e.g., an average) © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Schedules of Reinforcement Fixed Interval (FI) reinforcement follows behavior that occurs after a set amount of time has elapsed Variable Interval (VI) reinforcement follows behavior that occurs after an unpredictable amount of time has elapsed © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Schedules of Reinforcement © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Punishment Punishment decreases behavior. Positive Punishment behavior followed by aversive consequence aversive (unpleasant) stimulus is “added” Negative Punishment behavior followed by aversive consequence rewarding stimulus is “removed” © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Punishment © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Comparing Operant Procedures © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Controversy Over Punishment corporal punishment used by 70-90% of parents in the U.S. correlational research studies problems associated with punishment why should parents avoid spanking? is physical punishment necessary? © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Operant Conditioning Timing of Consequences immediate versus delayed reinforcement immediate versus delayed punishment immediate versus delayed reinforcement and punishment Applied Behavior Analysis behavior modification © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Observational Learning learning that occurs when a person observes and imitates behavior (modeling) Albert Bandura – Social Cognitive Theory four processes - attention - retention - motor reproduction - reinforcement © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Observational Learning © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Cognitive Factors in Learning Do cognitions matter? Does learning involve more than environment-behavior connections? Purposive Behavior in Humans - goal directed - goal setting - self-regulation and self-monitoring © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Cognitive Factors in Learning expectancy learning - information value latent learning/implicit learning insight learning © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Other Factors in Learning Biological Constraints instinctive drift preparedness Cultural Influences Psychological Constraints mindset: fixed v. growth © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Learning and Health and Wellness Factors influencing degree of stress predictability of stressor control over stressor improvement of (reduction in) stressor outlets for frustration © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Chapter Summary Explain what learning is. Describe classical conditioning. Discuss operant conditioning. Understand observational learning. Discuss the role of cognition in learning. Identify biological, cultural, and psychological factors in learning. Describe how principles of learning apply to health and wellness. © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Chapter Summary Learning is a relatively permanent change in behavior that occurs through experience. Classical Conditioning association between two stimuli terminology: CS, CR, UCS, UCR generalization and discrimination extinction and spontaneous recovery phobias and counterconditioning © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Chapter Summary Operant Conditioning stimulus response consequence positive and negative reinforcement positive and negative punishment schedules of reinforcement Observational Learning attention, retention, motor reproduction, and reinforcement © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Chapter Summary Cognitive Factors in Learning purposive behavior insight learning Other Factors in Learning biological, cultural, psychological constraints Learning and Health and Wellness variables aggravating stress © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.