Ji Kim PS3 May 7, 2010 Objective Describe the association between corticosterids/ immunosuppressions and PTDM Explain the treatments of PTDM Oral agents: biguanides, sulfonylureas, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones Insulin Introduction to Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes mellitus (DM)- a syndrome that is caused by a relative or absolute lack of insulin. Normoglycemia IFG or IGT (Pre-diabetes) DM FPG < 100 mg/dl FPG 100 – 125 mg/dl (IFG) FPG ≥ 126 mg/dl 2-h PG < 140 mg/dl 2-h PG 140 – 199 mg/dl (IGT) 2-h PG ≥ 200 mg/dl Symptoms of DM and random plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dl Glycated hemoglobin (A1C) is a form of hemoglobin used primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time. A1C goal <7% ADA guideline Insulin- made from beta cells of pancreatic islets of Langerhans PTDM incidence and risk factors In the 12 studies of kidney transplantation, incidence of PTDM estimates ranged from to 2 to 50%. Immunosuppression regimen explained 74% of the variability in the 12 months cumulative incidence (P =0.0004). (Victor M. Montori et al 2002) Risk factors Preexisting Nonmodifiable Age Gender Race/ethnicity Family history Potentially modifiable Obesity Physical inactivity Hepatitis C Transplant Associated Nonmodifiable Inherited and acquired defects in insulin sensitivity Potentially modifiable Weight gain Glucocorticoids Calcineurin inhibitors Sirolimus Kasiske BL et al. 2001 What is PTDM? PTDM has emerged as a major adverse effect of immunosuppressive drugs. Corticosteroids Affects glucose metabolism by increasing hepatic glucose production and by reducing peripheral tissue insulin sensitivity Related to the dose and the duration of therapy Calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine, tacrolimus ) Predominantly by impairimng beta cell insulin Tacrolimus is concentrated in the pancreas and it may inhibit pancreatic insulin secretion. mTOR inhibitor (sirolimus) Long-term mTOR inhibition impairs activation of IRS-1 and AKT and augments insulin resistance and β cell dysfunction Goldberg et al. 2007 & Pavlakis et al. 2008 PATIENT: JR 34 yo male with a PMH of severe aplastic anemia, status post unrelated donor stem cell transplant on July 2004 PMH: Chronic GVHD involving the mouth, eyes, liver, and skin Cellulitis of the foot Status post spelenectomy HTN Hyperlipidemia No hx of DM Admitted on April 13, 2010, for the lesion in the left foot with blisters Notable Medications Prior to admission Prednisone 20mg PO every other day Sirolimus 1mg PO every other day Tacrolimus 1mg PO two times a day Admission Zosyn 3.375g IV Q 6 h Levofloxacin 750mg/150ml Bag IV QPM LABS Prior to Admission 2/7/09 Glu level= 167 (↑ ) 2/28/10 Glu level= 191 (↑ ) 3/2/10 Glucose level= 168 (↑ ) Admission 4/13/10 Glucose level= 237 (↑ ) 4/14/10 Glucose level=180 (↑ ) Ht=5’6”, Wt=50kg, Scr=1.06 (4/14) IBW= 63.8kg, CrCL= 69 ml/min PTDM has been clearly associated with an elevated risk for serious infections, acute graft rejection, and even death. As diabetes has a negative impact on patient and graft outcome, the transplant practitioner must be cautious in screening and managing diabetes after transplantation. Let’s focus on the therapeutic management of PTDM!! Therapeutic management of DM Biguanides Generic name Total dose (trade) (mg/interval) MOA Comments Metformin (Glucophage) •↓ hepatic glucose output (Primary) •First line treatment in Type 2 patients •↓ insulin resistance in periphery (secondary) •Lactic acidosis (rare) 500-850mg BID/TID •↓ or delayed absorption of carbohydrates •Major CI is renal (Scr>1.4 females and Scr>1.5 males) •Iodinated IV radiocontrast dye Sulfonyureas Generic name (trade) Total dose (mg/interval) MOA Comments Glipizide (Glucotrol) 2.5-20mg QD/BID •↑ Insulin secretion from the Beta cells of pancreas •Hypoglycemia particularly with renal dysfunction Glyburide (Micronase/ Diabeta) 2.5-10mg QD/BID •↓ insulin resistance •Use cautiously in elderly and those with ↓ renal function 1-8mg QD •↓ hepatic glucose output Glimepiride (Amaryl) •Start at the low and end of the dosing range •Increase the dose every one or two weeks until maximum doses are achieved •DDI with Beta-blockers: ↑ hypoglycemic effect Meglitinides Generic name (trade) Total dose (mg/interval) MOA Comments Repaglinide (Prandin) Natgeglinide (Starlix) 0.5-4mg TID ↑ Insulin secretion from Beta cells of pancreas •Hypoglycemia particularly with renal dysfunction 60-120mg TID •Take only with meals. Skip dose if meal is skipped. (Good for patients who eat irregularly) •Major difference vs. Sulfonylureas: Short acting & target PPG levels • If no response from sulfonylurea, don’t switch to a meglitinide. Thiazolidinediones Generic name (trade) Total dose (mg/interval) MOA Comments Rosiglitazone (Avandia) 4-8mg QD/BID •↑ insulin sensitivity at the muscle by acting as an agonist on the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma which results in increased glucose uptake (Primary) •Indications for use include monotherapy, combined with metformin, sulfonuylureas, and insulin •↓ Hepatic glucose production (Secondary) •Can be used in renal failure 15-45mg QD Pioglitazone (Actos) •↓ insulin requirements and improve control •Slow onset (Onset at 3 weeks; max 4-8 wks) •No hypoglycemia •Weight gain • Use cautiously in pts with edema and heart failure •Monitor liver function test PTDM in Hospital setting Insulin treatment is generally preferred Superior predictability and rapid titratability Control hepatic glucose production Basal insulin preparation (intermediate/long-acting) between meals Bolus insulin (rapid/short-acting) to control postprandial elevations of blood glucose Use sliding scale insulin to “Start low and go slow” Fail PO agents -> add basal insulin -> add bolus insulin Inzucchi SE. et al. 2006 Oral agents can safely be used in medically stable patients Metformin is best AVOIDED due to contraindications Renal/hepatic impairement, HF, pending radiology studies involving IV contrast Sulfonylureas are most often used. Effective, low cost, average ↓blood glucose by 20%, ↓A1c 1.11.9% Shorter-acting meglitinides provide a reasonable inpatient alternative TZDs generally safe , but delayed onset of action (days to weeks), limiting their clinical utility Del Prato S. et al. 2006 Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) PROS: Not metabolized by the CYP3A4 system, lowering the risk for dangerous interactions with CNIs Baldwin and Duffin et al. (2004) ↓ A1c 8.1% to 6.7% (P=0.01) in 18 posttransplant pts with rosi and insulin/sulfonylurea Voltouch et al. (2005) 4 weeks rosiglitazone treatment (8mg/d) Improves insulin sensitivity Significant decline in fasting and 2 h plasma glucose (from 6.4 to 5.8 mmol/l, P = 0.01 and from 14.2 to 10.6 mmol/l, P = 0.03 CONS: Nissen SE et al. (2007) ↑ risk of MI and borderline increase in the risk of cardiovascular death CONTROVERSY? Back to the Case, JR Date Glucose Level (mg/dL) Treatments 4/16/10 266 (↑ ) • • 4/17/10 218-426 (↑ ↑) Start Insulin Sliding scale 4/20 /10 172 (↑ ) •Blood sugar elevated while patient is on prednisone Start Glipizide XL 5mg PO daily (4/16-4/20) Use Accu-check QAC, QHS •Switch to glyburide 5mg before breakfast when he is on prednisone 20mg (4/21-4/26) •Only use glyburide 2.5mg daily for the days when he is not on prednisone (4/22- 4/27) •Humalog sliding scale using 2 units for each increment of 50mg/dl of blood glucose greater than 150mg/dl AC and HS Glipizide XL vs. Glyburide Both 2nd generation sulfonyureas Glipizide XL Initial dose 5mg daily; increase by 5mg q 1-2 weeks Duration: 24 hours Absorption: Rapid and complete Glyburide Dose: 1.25-20mg/d QD or BID Onset of action: Serum insulin levels begin to increase 15-60 minutes after a single dose Duration: ≤24 hours Absorption: Significant within 1 hour Date Glucose Level (mg/dL) Treatments 4/25/10 268 (↑ ) Increase to glyburide 10mg after breakfast and 5mg before dinner every other day (4/25–4/29) Change prednisone 20mg daily Hold insulin sliding scale 4/27/10 60 (↓) Felt sweaty and shaky-> orange juice Hold glyburide Continue Humalog sliding scale (4/27- present) 5/1/10 312 (↑ ) 5/2/10 164 (↑ ) Switch to glimepiride 1mg PO every other day (5/1-5/2) Increase to glimepiride 2mg PO every other day (5/3 to 5/4) 5/3/10 332 (↑) 5/4/10 150 (↑) Increase to glimepiride 4mg PO every other day (5/4 to present) Glyburide vs. Glimepiride Glyburide 2nd generation of sulfonyureas Glimepiride 3rd generation of sulfonyureas Mild reduction in insulin resistance Less hypoglycemic effects Safe in patients with advanced kidney disease Dose: 1-4mg once daily; after a dose of 2mg once daily, increase in increments of 2mg at 1 to 2 week intervals Maximum dose 8mg once daily Glucose, POC (Whole Blood) Glucose, POC(Whole Blood) (mG/dL) 450 4/17 Initiate insulin 400 4/20 Switch to glyburide 350 5/1 Switch to Glimepiride 300 mG/dL 250 200 150 H 100 L 4/27 Hypoglycemia 50 15 Thu Apr 2010 22 Thu 1 May ROMERO, JOSE Alternative Immunosuppressive treatments? Both calcineurin inhibitors alter insulin secretion Effects of tacrolimus seem to be more profound and intense compared with the CsA-induced ones Tacrolimus specific binding protein, i.e. FKBP-12, is preferentially located in beta cells, leading to a strong concentration of the drug in these cells CsA specific binding site (ciclophiline) is preferentially located in the heart, the liver and kidneys. Higher incidence in tacrolimus Woodward RS, et al. (2003) 1. In the 6-month, open-label, randomized, prospective multicenter DIRECT study Tacrolimus and CsA were compared in 567 non-diabetic kidney graft recipents PTDM or new IFG occurred in 26% of CsA and 33.6% in tacrolimus (P=0.046) Heisel O, et al. (2004) 2. Meta-analysis of 56 prospective and randomised clinical trials 16.6% with tacrolimus vs. 9.8% with CsA, without any difference according to the transplanted organ FK/MTX vs. CsA/MTX as GVHD Yagasaki H. et al. 2009 Patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) given unrelated donor BMT 47 pairs matched exactly for recipient age & conditioning regimens 45 patients achieved engraftment in FK & 42 patient in CsA Results FK/MTX CsA/MTX P value Grade II-IV acute GVHD 28.9% 32.6% 0.558 Chronic GVHD 13.3% 36% 0.104 5-year survival 82.8% 49.5% 0.012 Sirolimus Sirolimus is a potent immunosuppresant 1. Johnson RW et al.(2001) and Kreis H et al. (2000) NODM rates were not reduced in sirolimus treated patients 2. Romagnoli J et al. (2006) Combination CsA and sirolimus has been associated with more NODM than CsA alone 3. Teutonico A et al. (2005) Decreases in insulin sensitivity, pancreatice cell function, and overall glucose tolerance have been demostrated, either after conversion from CsA to sirolimus or after tacrolimus elimination from a combined tacrolimus/sirolimus regimen Effect of corticosteroid-sparing regimen on PTDM Chronic high-dose steroid therapy was a major contributing factor to the development of PTDM. Boots et al. (2002) 62 patients treated with tacrolimus were prospectively randomized to stop Prednisone 10mg after day 7 posttransplantation (STOP) or to gradually taper steroids in 3-6months (TAP) Follow up of2.7 years Incidence of PTDM STOP 8% and TAP 30.3% (p=0.04) Back to the Case, JR JR is on prednisone, tacrolimus, and sirolimus since August 2004 City of Hope protocol for GVHD patients So many options: making the right choice for JR? May 5, 2010 Glu= 206 @13:23 (↑ ) JR is on glimepiride 4mg PO every other day, insulin sliding scale, prednisone, tacrolimus, sirolimus His blood sugar is still uncontrolled, continue following the same regimen? My recommendation If inadequate response to maximal dose (8mg), then combination therapy with TZDs may be considered. Insulin therapy Traditional basal-bolus insulin regimens, such as glargine/detemir insulin combined with rapid-acting, may be considered. Tailoring immunossupression Conversion to cyclosporine may be considered. Therapeutic lifestyle modifications Diet-limited intake of calories, carbohydrates, and saturated fats Exercise-aerobic activity, resistance training Conclusion PTDM results from impaired insulin secretion and peripheral insulin resistance, largely generated by chronic immunosuppression. In trasplanted patients, hyperglycemia is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease, serious infections, graft rejection, and even death. PTDM should be treated in a comprehensive and aggressive manner. THANK YOU!!! Any Questions???