Chapter 9: Scientific Literacy and the New Progressivism Chapter Goals: 1. Clarify what is meant by scientific literacy. 2. Relate scientific literacy to other educational goals. 3. Summarize the development of the concept of scientific literacy from the 1960’s through the 1980’s. Historic Overview 1960’s & 1970’s—the emphasis on keeping up with the Soviet’s diminishes and more focus is given to providing an equitable education environment to American’s regardless of race, gender, physical handicap, economic status The call is for science for an “enlightened citizenry” not an “educational elite” o Therefore science should be relevant to a wide range of students Provide for differences in ability/student interest Provide for student choice in course selection Provide individualized instruction These ideas of student interest/social relevance were like those of the progressive education movement of the 1950’s that had been condemned 1970’s “scientific literacy” and “new progressivism” becomes the watchword in science education Scientific Literacy 1958--First used by Paul DeHart Hurd of Stanford University o Said scientific literacy was an understanding of science and its application to social experience because of the growing influence of science in the field of technology, and its impact on values, politics and economic problems 1963—Robert Carlton, NSTA—Asks scientists and science educators what scientific literacy means. o Most said greater content knowledge in a broad range of scientific fields o Few spoke of the relationship between science and society o Howard Meyerhoff said scientific literacy implied not “omniscience” but “sufficient knowledge” to understand reports given of new discoveries 1965—Koelsche identifies principles and vocabulary o 175 scientific principles and 693 vocabulary words that were most common in newspapers and magazines o These lists should be taught to provide knowledge of a “desirable subject matter” 1967—Milton Pella examines 100 science education articles to determine what is meant by scientific literacy 1. Interrelations between science and society (67 times) 2. Ethics of science (58 times) 3. Nature of science (51 times) 4. Conceptual knowledge (26 times) 5. Science and technology (21 times) 6. Science in the humanities (21 times) Pella said the new science curricula failed to include adequate mention of social applications, technology, and science in the humanities. 1974—Norman Smith, NASA aerospace researcher defines scientific literacy as “an understanding of the events around us, the ability to verify the truth of claims made by lay persons and the popular media about science, and the ability to evaluate the relevance and importance of scientific developments and projects in relation to the needs of society.” To most people, the idea of scientific literacy meant a broad and functional understanding of science. Science should be understood as an important social force that people could use to answer questions in their daily lives, not simply as a set of abstract principles familiar only to experts. Hurd suggests that scientific literacy meant understanding the coherence of science and society 1971—NSTA identifies scientific literacy as the most important goal for science education for the 1970’s. o They said a scientifically literate person understands the interrelationships between science, technology, and other factors in society including social and economic development o Reaffirmation of progressive education principles Science-Technology-Society Theme 1971—James Gallagher proposes an STS (science-technology-society) theme of science education. Said that understanding the interrelations of science, technology, and society are as important as understanding the concepts and processes of science. 1982—NSTA links STS and scientific literacy o Incorporates a humanistic education, value oriented, relevant to personal life, society, and environmental concerns Humanistic View 1. did not omit human factor when teaching science 2. included connection between science and humanities 3. used humane teaching methods (student choice, meaningful experience) Values Education—key component of STS approach o important so students could make informed decisions regarding critical issues that affected their lives (nuclear holocaust, polluted water and atmosphere, lead poisoning, energy conservation, and soil erosion) Environmental Education o Part of STS approach but also separate subject o Environmental education efforts were characterized by a lack of organization, vague, and they disregarded curricular guidelines Organization of Science 1982—Hofstein & Yager argued that we should organize science curriculum around social issues rather than concepts of disciplines – very controversial They argued content should be selected not because of its disciplinary value but because of its utility in dealing with real-world problems. Said the issues approach would appeal to a wider audience of students than discipline-centered approach. Widely disputed that this way of organization would be counter productive to scientific literacy because it focused on temporary societal issues rather than skills for dealing with technological problems of the future Opponents Kromhout and Good said it wasn’t bad to use socially relevant problems to motivate students to study science, but it is not ok to use current (temporary) societal issues as fundamental organizers for science curriculum – this perpetuates our country’s widespread flight from science.