Do’s and Don’ts for Corporate Finance case study write-ups Last Revised: March 5, 2012 Your case study write-ups are a major part of your assessment. We ask you to adhere to the following guidelines. First of all, a clear and concise presentation of your work is imperative. We will evaluate your write-ups based on content and the quality of your presentation, and we reserve the right to ignore those parts of your write-up that are not comprehensible. We limit the write ups to a maximum of four (4) DIN A4, 1.5 line spaced computer written pages in 12pt font size with a 2cm margin on the left, top, and bottom and a 3cm margin on the right (give yourself a chance to receive feedback). Please use font type "Times New Roman" only and note that reducing word spacing and character size or changing the font type in order to squeeze in more text is not acceptable and will lead to a reduced grade for your case. DO… aim for a concise, analytical style. analyse by example and by reference. o By example: "...there are circumstances where the plan resulted in zero payouts because of one significant event (a zero incentive payout in ’92 because of the loss of a single customer)..." o By reference: "The plan is quite complex and subject to change at any time (see the final note on Case Exhibit 6)." try to draw inferences from the numbers and exhibits given in the case. It is not enough simply to understand how the case spreadsheets have been created; you need to use them to illustrate and justify your analysis. o use your conceptual knowledge of finance, accounting, economics and other disciplines of management and apply it to the case. The point of this case course is to let you demonstrate your conceptual knowledge by applying it to a real life application. o Example: "Here the conditions for applying the internal rate of return-criterion are satisfied..." use the lectures, lecture notes, teaching notes and the textbooks (especially the assigned chapters) to enhance your conceptual knowledge and build a framework for analyzing the case. o Example: "Computing P/E-ratios for companies X and Z from exhibit 10 and comparing them with industry averages (exhibit 11) allows us to conclude that..." Example: If you read the lecture slides that show why the present value of future EVAs is equal to the NPV of a project, you stand much better chances to pick up what is right about EVA as a performance metric. give a clear structure to your spreadsheets. Spreadsheet printouts must be readable without access to the electronic version of the tables: o Assumptions should be declared as such and grouped together in one area, for example at the top or bottom of the sheet. o For key mathematical operations it is sometimes advisable to number the lines in a separate column and to use line-references (e. g., (3)=(1)*(2)). o Key results should be grouped together in the same way. For example, if you do a valuation, you should not have to search all over the spreadsheet to find the value of the company. provide a basis for your assumptions wherever possible. The statement "I use average yield of CCC-rated debt (15.2%, from exhibit 10), as a discount rate" is far superior to "I assume the cost of debt is 15%." put all your numerical analysis (spreadsheets) into tables in an appendix and number them. Then refer to them in your verbal exposition in the text. o Example: "On the basis of these assumptions we perform a DCF-analysis (see table 2)." put all discussions of assumptions in the text. Reading your verbal exposition should give the reader a clear understanding of the logical steps of your analysis and how you built your spreadsheets. The reader should be in a position to unambiguously recreate your tables. answer all the questions and structure your write-up along the questions. Write your text in English. DON’T… use the "chatty" approach to answering questions. make value judgements (such as: "this is the wrong approach") without saying why and/or suggesting a better one. For example: "Prime + 2% is not the right way to approximate cost of capital." Why not? What might be more suitable? make loose generalizations that may or may not be correct. For example, the statement "In today’s business environment, managers frequently do not stay in the same position for a long period of time." is too general and should be avoided. simply repeat data or exhibits that are given in the case. Use them by reference to justify your analysis or to emphasize a point that you are making. Assume the reader of your write-up is familiar with the case, you do not need to summarize it or fill your write-up with lengthy quotes. repeat passages from textbooks, teaching notes or lecture notes. Assume the reader is familiar with those, so you can just reference them. surrender to the temptation of producing endless pages of spreadsheet output in order to make your case write-up appear more analytical. All exhibits and tables you attach should have a clear purpose for your argument and be referenced in the text. write answers to questions that have not been asked. You do not need to restate the questions themselves (we know them!), but it should be clear which part of your text refers to which question. exceed the space limit. extend the page-limit by including verbal discussions and expositions in your exhibits. If your exhibits are mainly verbal, we will count them as text.