Table of Contents - "S_300_349.doc"__
S-300.
S-301.
S-302.
S-303.
S-304.
S-305.
S-306.
book
S-307.
S-308.
S-309:
S-310:
S-311:
S-312:
S-313:
S-314:
S-315:
S-316:
S-317:
S-318:
S-319:
S-320:
S-321:
S-322:
S-323.
S-324.
S-325.
S-326.
S-327.
S-328.
S-329.
S-330.
S-331.
S-332.
S-333.
S-334.
S-335.
S-336.
S-337.
S-338.
S-339.
S-340.
S-341.
S-342.
from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding misc. correspondences from supporters & detractors
from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding crystal growth in space
from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UIC-MPL research prior to UNITEL
from Andrew Potter upon receiving the promotional edition of the Aero book
from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an essay on UFOs by Gary Voss of TAP-TEN
from Larry Maurer of UNITEL reporting he received the books
from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail to Yosharini Minami regarding the Aero
from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding afterthoughts on the promotional Aero edition
from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the "Holo-1" Quantum Computer book
from Lori Cordini regarding Carol Rutz' unfortunate experiences with "Black Ops" programs
from Andrew Potter regarding a virus that appeared to target UNITEL
from Andrew Potter forwarding an e-mail from Larry Maurer that "the rest of the world has
caught up to UNITEL"
from Andrew Potter regarding complex quantum computer simulations
from Andrew Potter regarding proposed change in UNITEL marketing strategies
from Jack Sarfatti regarding the physical Hyperspace and the quantum-Mental Multiverse
from "Adam" regarding 'psychoactive' materials in UFOs
from Bruce Maccabee regarding UFO science and origins
from John Schnurer (JNL Labs) regarding quantum-based "theories"
from Jack Sarfatti regarding his archive of previously-lost UFO-physics documents
from T. Akin rgarding Quantum Theories of Gravity
from John Schnurer (of JNL Labs) regarding the Aspen Effect
from Bob King regarding "Timeline of Secret Government Projects" essay at Cassiopaea site
from Jack Sarfatti regarding Zero-Point Fluctuation Geodesic Motion
from Wayne Mitchell regarding "Project Ghost"
from John Schnurer regarding the Apsen Effect
from Mark Solis regarding "speeds" of light
from Andrew Potter forwarding physics discussion between Larry Maurer & Edward Halerewicz
from Andrew Potter forwarding correspondence from Larry Maurer on writing UNITEL's
HOLO-1 and "Flying Colors" books
from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding dark energy and gravity waves
from Dr. Max Tegmark regarding his Scientific American "Parallel Universes" article
from Andrew Potter regarding new photonic crystals bend light to ANY frequency
from Andrew Potter forwarding correspondence from Larry Maurer (UNITEL) regarding roomtemperature superconductors
from Tom Bearden regarding the Aharnov-Anandan and Berry phases
from Dr. Velimir Abamovic regarding 'Time' in physical and biological systems
from Andrew Potter forwarding Edward Halerewicz, Jr.'s comments about UNITEL's book
from Andrew Potter forwarding Q&A between Ed Halerewitcz, Jr. and Larry Maurer
from Dr. Velimir Abramovic regarding his "snail" & web addresses
from Andrew Potter regarding Internet rumors on UNITEL
from Tom Skeggs regarding the "basics" of the Montauk Project
from NIDS regarding UNITEL's proposals
from Dr. Reginald Jaynes regarding adding <link> from his website
from Thomas Skeggs regarding remote-viewing Montauk
from Edward Halerewicz, Jr. regarding UNITEL, Bob Lazar, Edward Teller, Andrei Sakharov
492
S-343.
S-344.
S-345.
S-346.
S-347.
S-348.
from Thomas Skeggs just "touching bases"
from Thomas Skeggs regarding writing a book about his Montauk-related research
from Thoams Skeggs regarding the Montauk Project and MK-ULTRA
from Thomas Skeggs regarding time-travel experiments in former missile silos
from Thomas Skeggs regarding remote-viewing Plattsburgh AFB
from Thomas Skeggs regarding "shielding" remote-viewing
S-300. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding misc. correspondences from supporters &
detractors
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: Is this guy for real?
Date : Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:33:52 -0700
> To: time02112@scientist.com
> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> Subject: Is this guy for real?
>
> Gary:
>
> This guy Sarfatti is really bordering on a Libel suit. Where does he get off dedicating himself to
bad mouth us? Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black! I just do not understand him. How can
we that bad, being called morons, crackpots, etc., when we have patents (especially our Japanese
patent that took 8 years because they are much more thorough in their patent scrutiny), along with
our esteemed associates, subcontractors/manufacturers (certainly UIC is one of the most respected
world-class organizations) and on and on? Is he working for the Taliban or our large established
corporate competition? Throughout this whole ordeal of Sarfatti's rantings the past few years,
Sarfatti has not come up with one iota of proof of what part of our proposed aerospace propulsion
design that he finds fault with. I really do not think he is bright enough to understand our design.
He only wants to be one of the naysayers in hopes that we will be wrong which will make him
appear to be the guy to go to for getting approval for any new designs. How sick is this fellow?!
>
> I know he has contacted Dr. Terence Barrett, Dr. Sivananthanon, and several others to put them on
the spot and bad mouth us. I've threatened to sue him before and he agreed to cease his meandering
dark comments against us so I did not pursue the law suit. Now, I am going to be so upset if he
convinces our publishers to not publish our book. Oh brother!
>
> Anyway, thought I would bring this matter to your attention. Please let me know what you think
as I want to send you one of the promotion books. This is so depressing Gary. Too many people
have put in so much work for us over the last 20 years or so and they do not deserve such illmannered treatment. I sure hope there are enough individuals that support our theory and design to
email or write Sarfatti to let him know a piece of their mind!
>
> Regards,
>Larry Maurer
>>
>> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 16:48:24 -0700
>> From: Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com>
493
>> Subject: RE: American Antigravity Photon Confirmation {New Cover Photo from Wired
Magazine?}
>>
To:
Alan
Parker
<cmdrparker@hotmail.com>,
Brother
Blue
<brotherblue93@hotmail.com>, "DarkEditor@aol. com" <DarkEditor@aol.com>, Ron
Pandolfi
<pandolfi@zzapp.org>,
Puthoff@aol.com,
WeeklyFiles@filersfiles.com,
UriGeller@compuserve.com, yokatta@oxy.edu, wcri@erols.com, zyzygyz@yahoo.com,
vadim@belrus.kuban.ru, foresight@foresight.org, office@faraday.ru, lmaurer@unitelnw.com,
cadler@mindspring.com, Gary Voss <time02112@scientist.com> Cc: "Amara@Kurzweilai.
Net" <amara@kurzweilai.net>, "Alw@Peaceinspace. Com" <alw@peaceinspace.com>,
"Awret@Erols. Com" <awret@erols.com>, APOLLINAIR <APOLLINAIR@aol.com>,
Brumac <brumac@compuserve.com>, Congressman Dana <Dana@mail.house.gov>, Daniel
Sheehan <info@peaceinspace.com>, David Crockett Williams <gear2000@lightspeed.net>,
David Gladstone <d1494@wt.net>, "Decker@Ufomag. Com" <decker@ufomag.com>,
Edgarmitchell <edgarmitchell@email.msn.com>, Eldon A Byrd <trans-universal@juno.com>,
Eric Davis <tachyondavis@hotmail.com>, Fernando Loup <feghcrl@lusitania-cs.pt>, "Gary
G. Ford" <swimp@shaw.ca>, Foggy Writer <CloudRider@aol.com>, Frank Lauria
<baycitymedia@email.msn.com>, GeorgeWeis <GeorgeWeis@aol.com>, Glen Lindenstadt
<GlenL@Pacbell.net>,
Henryward
<hpw9@pacbell.net>,
Henry
Monteith
<henrym@roswell.net>, Ibison <ibison@earthtech.org>, JagdishM <JagdishM@aol.com>,
Jeffrey Mishlove <info@intuition.org>, Jfwoodward <jfwoodward@juno.com>, John Dering
<JDering@sara.com>,
Kim
Burrafato
<lensman@stardrive.org>,
Klaskey
<klaskey@gmu.edu>, Koen J Van Vlaenderen <nl88494@nl.ibm.com>, Mata Hari Von
Brownie <rosin@west.net>, Michael Sarfatti <mike@hia.com>, Michael Nisgore
<nisgore@hotmail.com>,
Mike
Coyle
<vericomm@idiom.com>,
MindForms
<MindForms@aol.com>, Mike Rossman <mrossman@igc.org>, Nicole Tedesco
<nicole@tedesco.name>,
Paul
Zielinski
<pzielins@ix.netcom.com>,
Robbins
<robbins@math.sfsu.edu>, Russell Targ <radiant@pacbell.net>, Saul Paul Sirag
<sirag@mindspring.com>, "Skrippner@Saybrook. Edu" <skrippner@saybrook.edu>, Stan
Tenen <meru1@well.com>, Steve New Wolff <swolff@inter-the-gateway.com>, Steven
Greer <drsgreer@cseti.org>, Tim Ventura <tventura6@attbi.com>, Timdeeg2002
<timdeeg2002@yahoo.de>, UFO Files <WeeklyFiles@filersfiles.com>, "Vecker@Ufomag.
Com" <vecker@ufomag.com>, "Visions@Ntlworld. Com" <visions@ntlworld.com>, Wcri
<wcri@erols.com>, Wes Thomas <west@sonic.net>, Yokatta <yokatta@oxy.edu>
>> Reply-to: sarfatti@well.com
>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
>> Importance: Normal
>> X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>>
>> This is all Crackpot Cargo Cult Pseudo-Science Flim-Flam Flap-Doodle for technical
morons by morons. The blind leading the gullible down the primrose path to disaster.
>>
>>> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:45:21 -0700
>>>
>>> To: Gary Voss
>>> T.A.P.-T.E.N. Research
>>> <vosstech@yahoo.com>
>>> Email Replies To: <Time02112@scientist.com>
>>> From: "Xtreme Xpeditions Team" <Director@XtremeXpeditions.net>
>>> Subject: Xpeditions Magazine - Travel Edition
>>>
494
>>> ******** "Have you written a book and need a publisher?" *************
>>>E-mail Carol Adler at Dandelion Publishing: cadler@mindspring.com
>>>
>>>Best Wishes
>>>
>>> ---Jerry & Kathy Wills
>>> Editors, Xpeditions Magazine
>>> (Somewhere in America...)
>>> Thanks :)
>>> [Xtreme List Administrator]
>>>
>>> "If you or someone you know has information about any ancient site and would like
us to investigate it, please contact us (e-mail) with the details or call 602 243 9092. All
correspondence is strictly confidential." http://www.xpeditionsmagazine.com
>>>
>>> ************You may find the following of "Newsworthy" Great Interest!
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tapten/message/1791
>>>
>>> Check out the new "Lifter" Photo at our online "Photos" section!
>>> Doug Starfield & Friend Clive, (Reporter for Wired Magazine] posing in front of "The
Lifter" (Special Thanks To "Tim Ventura" and "Larry Maurer" for submitting this jpg!)
>>> Posted: 14-Jul-2002 by vosstech - Resolution: 480 x 360
>>> Thumbnail: 2 KB | Screen Size: 56 KB | Full Size: 124 KB
>>>
>>> Note: You will need to select the feature "Show All" on the top of the photo album's
front page in order to view all thumbnail photos on a single page.
http://photos.groups.yahoo.com/group/tapten/lst
>>>>
>>>> Latest News Flash on the "Lifter" -->>>> This has yet to be released to the General Public!!
>>>>
>>>> To: lmaurer@unitelnw.com
>>>> Subject: Future Mission Objectives & New Developments...
>>>> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 02:40:30 -0500
>>>>
>>>> "Hello Again Larry!
>>>>
>>>> Just plugging in to get updated on what's ahead for UNITEL and what your latest
interests are focused on pertaining to future developments & mission objectives.
>>>>
>>>> Lots of exciting things happening within TAP-TEN, you should take a look at
this website, Larry! [UNITEL is mentioned there.] I think you will have many
questions after you had a moment to absorb the videos & data files."
>>>>
>>>>*American Antigravity Website: http://www.americanantigravity.com
>>>>
>>>>> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>>>>> To: time02112@scientist.com
>>>>> Subject: Fwd: Wired Magazine Interview
>>>>> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:48:45 -0700
495
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Gary:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am forwarding you an email from Tim Ventura of a photo of our VP Doug
Starfield and the Wired magazine writer Mac, who they are writing a story that
includes UNITEL.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am getting 20 promo copies of our Aerospace Propulsion book we are
talking to McGraw-Hill, Barnes & Noble. I will send you a copy if you like. Stay
tuned, my friend! Harold McGee, Austin, TX is trying to buy a machine shop to
construct and test our various prototypes that fits right in with what you mention
herein. Talk to you soon!"
>>>>>
>>>>> ---Larry
>>>>> *UNITEL Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> UNITEL Inc. is a technology development company that owns a generic
patent with ten (10) claims both in the U.S. (No. 4,817,102, March 28, 1989) and in
Japan (No.1,864,717, August 8, 1994), with patents approved but not yet received in
Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Korea, Luxembourg, the Netherlands,
Sweden and the United Kingdom (No. 89906639.3, September 11, 1990) on a
system with multiple applications. This generic quantum electronics system design
applications include computing and aerospace propulsion. UNITEL is prepared to
build a prototype quantum computer system entitled HOLO-1. HOLO-1 uses a
specially-designed crystal laser lens to store, retrieve, and process data using light
instead of electricity. http://www.unitelnw.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **********From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>>>>>> To: time02112@scientist.com
>>>>>> Subject: Fwd: "Wired Magazine Interview"
>>>>>> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:48:45 -0700
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Tim Ventura" <tventura6@attbi.com>
>>>>>> To: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>>>>>> Subject: Wired Magazine Interview
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:09:29 -0700
>>>>>> X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Larry:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't give you a guarantee that it will make the article, but Doug
Starfield was here today with myself and the reporter from Wired Magazine he
did a really good overview of the UNITEL idea, so the reporter should be
definitely briefed on your project & goals.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've attached a photo of Doug & Clive posing in front of the Lifter if
this makes the magazine, then you are completely set."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks;
>>>>>>
496
>>>>>> --Tim Ventura
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- In tapten@y..., "Tom" <ftadefy@h...> wrote:
>>>>>>> Research into Lifters has been carried out in France for some time
at the JPN by Jean-Louis Naudin. http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/lifters.htm and
dozens of locations around the world. http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/lfreplog.htm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---->>>>>>> From: vosstech
>>>>>>> To: tapten@y...
>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 5:05 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: [tapten] Re: ....... American Antigravity Photon
Confirmation ........
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is indeed truly amazing work, and I implore you all to take a
look at the video's and data on Tim Ventura's American Antigravity website!
WoW! I can't wait to get the funding resources to start building these here in
San Diego! of course we will invite those who are involved to join us &
assist us with our joint projects when we are ready.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for sharing with us Bill, let's be sure to email Tim an
invite to join our group and share more with us here at our message boards
to discuss his ideas with us.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---T12 of TAP-TEN
>>>>>>> American Antigravity Website:
>>>>>>> http://www.americanantigravity.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --- In tapten@y..., Bill Butler <worldspaceman@y...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Great Work Tim...!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks Man, Bill@WST
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To: space-elevator@y...
>>>>>>>>> From: "tventura6" <tventura6@a...>
>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 02:20:57 -0000
>>>>>>>>> Subject: [space-elevator] American Antigravity >>>>>>>>> http://www.americanantigravity.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
###################################################
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear Group >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm a new member involved with Biefeld-Brown and other
electromagnetic propulsion research, and I manage the website
http://www.americanantigravity.com
>>>>>>>>>
497
>>>>>>>>>> The website covers in detail Lifter technology and several
other areas of EM Propulsion, including:
>>>>>>>>>> - Lifter technology (video, photos, explanations)
>>>>>>>>>> - Lifter tech complete plans and parts guides
>>>>>>>>>> - The Hutchinson Effect
>>>>>>>>>> - Mark Tomion's StarDrive
>>>>>>>>>> - Hovertech's Ion-Containment Device
>>>>>>>>>> - UNITEL NW's MQT StarDrive Device
>>>>>>>>>> - Deseversky's 1950's Ionocraft Tests
>>>>>>>>>> - Applied Electrogravitics Beamship Tests
>>>>>>>>>> - Prof. Fran De Aquino's System-G Gravity-Shield
>>>>>>>>>> - Betavoltaic Isotopic Power-Cell Devices
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tim Ventura
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.americanantigravity.com
S-301. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding crystal growth in space
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: CNN.com - Space crew grows crystals, could be real gas - July 9, 2002
Date : Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:19:06 -0700
Attachment : 53d7b4.jpg (1k), 53d83c.jpg (1k), 53d845.jpg (16k), 53d85b.jpg (7k), 53d86a.jpg (5k),
53d878.jpg (1k), 53d883.jpg (1k), 53d88e.jpg (2k), 53d89a.jpg (5k), 53d8a7.jpg (6k), 53d8b5.jpg (7k),
53d8c5.jpg (78k), 53d8f3.jpg (1k)
Mark:
Thanks. We have been aware of the crystal growth in space where conditions are extremely optimal to
MBE grow our patented lens. Especially before we found UIC MP Labs that were the only labs capable
of MBE growth of the II-VI compound lens as all other labs are set up for III-V compound crystals. We
had considered the NASA space labs but was very expensive and exotic if we were lucky enough to get
them to grow the crystals. Fortunately, with the assistance from Mike DeBruzzi at EPI MBE Equipment
Mfrs., we found Siva and UIC MP Labs. Siva is an expert on II-VI compounds and their applications to
various devices (which was done for USN and US Army Labs as well for heat-seeking, night-vision
equipment).
It would be cool to get NASA and/or Russians to grow the very large doped RF transparent glass
crystallite II-VI compound lens of our design which was also suggested by Mike DeBruzzi for the last
layer to be MBE grown to ensure chromaticity (lasing). Lets find out!
Best,
Larry
At 06:27 AM 7/16/02 -0700, you wrote:
498
<http://cnn.space.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailT
oID=2104441964>
CNN.com - Space crew grows crystals, could be real gas - July 9, 2002
>
>
>http://cnn.space.savethis.clickability.com/st/saveThisPopupApp?clickMap=saveFrom
ET&partnerID=2018&etMailToID=2104441964>53d89a.jpg
>
>http://cnn.space.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=forward&etMailTo
ID=2104441964&partnerID=2018>53d8a7.jpg
S-302. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UIC-MPL research prior to UNITEL
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: HgCdTe => CdTe:Te
Date : Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:42:32 -0700
At 08:55 PM 7/15/02 -0400, you wrote:
>
> Then we need to update/modify that figure before I put out the next batch. If you get any
questions regarding that, tell them whatever.
>
> I liked it because it emphasized the challenging interrelationships between R&D in this
new materials science field. I'm hoping it will answer some of the questions as to "why are
they taking so long"?
>
> E-mail me what I should substitute in those boxes (i.e., change 'Army Labs' to 'UIC MPL',
etc.)
>
> I haven't gotten anything from Sarfatti for a long time now. I guess he is still on the
warpath, though. I don't know how much influence someone like him can wield, but I think
your book can stand on its own. But then I know nothing about the publisher business. It
would seem to me that Jack has made more than his share of enemies, though, so it shouldn't
be too hard to find somebody who's equally tired of his tirades and antics.
>
>> From: Larry Maurer
>> To: "Stealth Skater"
>> Subject: Re: HgCdTe -or- CdTe:Te ???
>> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 10:09:48 -0700
>>
>> Mark:
>>
>> No, we are working with UIC Physics Labs. No, we do not use mercury.
>>
>> At 06:49 PM 7/12/02 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>>> Larry -499
>>>
>>> Check that old document/drawing (looks like a Powerpoint >>slide) on
>>Research & Development. That's the one I just re-did and sent it to you as a
48K MS-Word document.
>>>
>>> All through the documents you consistently mention CdTe:Te. But in that
drawing, at the top it says "High Operation Temperature / IF FPA's / based on
HgCdTe". Was the mercury compound a predecessor? If it's no longer used and
has been superceded by the cadmium stuff, let me know so I can update that
drawing.
>>>
>>> Also on the same one, in the middle it says the "University of Illionois at
Chicago Army Research Lab / Northrop-Grumman". Is this something different
or has it been replaced by the UIC Microphysics Lab?
>>>
>>>-- Mark
Mark:
It's UIC that sent me the material or actually the documents was given to me along with other related
material at UIC when I visited them a couple of years ago. Screw that Safarti guy anyway. Full steam
ahead, aye Mark? Lots going on with films, new interested investors wanting to back Harold McGee's
machine shop in Austin Texas, Tap-Ten machine shop in San Diego, Tim Ventura's Lifter, and so forth.
Can't wait to push the books! I will be sending you the HOLO-1 document soon.
Best,
L.
S-303. from Andrew Potter upon receiving the promotional edition of the Aero book
From : Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Holy Shit! Talk about a bombshell document!
Date : Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:42:26 -0400
Stealth,
I haven't had time to read the entire book yet, but just from glancing through it (especially the
intro/conclusion, etc) this fucking blows me away. I noticed you put in memos from Boeing and Rolls
Royce. Publishers should be lining up at UNITEL's door after they see this.
Anyhow, a magnificent work. I'll keep you posted if I find any errors while I'm reading the book.
Amazing! Keep up the good work, man!
-Andrew
500
S-304. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an essay on UFOs by Gary Voss of TAP-TEN
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: Speculative Engineering [More Power for the course.]
Date : Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:47:47 -0700
>
> X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404)
> From: "Gary Voss" <time02112@scientist.com>
> To: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:15:19 -0500
> Subject: Speculative Engineering, [More Power for the course.]
> X-Originating-Ip: 172.171.5.87
> X-Originating-Server: ws1-3.us4.outblaze.com
> X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>
> I have added some highlights here taken from:
> "How to Build a Flying Saucer After So Many Amateurs Have Failed: An essay in
Speculative Engineering by T. B. P. "
>
> I trust you will find many familiar descriptions that correlate to our ideas.
>
> ---T12
>
>> At the end of the nineteenth century, the most distinguished scientists and
engineers declared that no known combination of materials and locomotion could be
assembled into a practical flying machine. Fifty years later another generation of
distinguished scientists and engineers declared that it was technologically infeasible
for a rocket ship to reach the moon. Nevertheless, men were getting off the ground
and out into space even while these words were uttered.
>>
>>In the last half of the twentieth century, when technology is advancing faster than
reports can reach the public, it is fashionable to hold the pronouncements of
yesterday's experts to ridicule. But there is something anomalous about the
consistency with which eminent authorities fail to recognize technological advances
even while they are being made. You must bear in mind that these men are not given
to making public pronouncements in haste; their conclusions are reached after
exhaustive calculations and proofs, and they are better informed about their subject
than anyone else alive. But by and large, revolutionary advances in technology do not
contribute to the advantage of established experts, so they tend to believe that the
challenge cannot possibly be realized.
>>
>> The UFO phenomenon is a perversity in the annals of revolutionary engineering.
On the one hand, public authorities deny the existence of flying saucers and prove
their existence to be impossible. This is just as we should expect from established
experts. But on the other hand, people who believe that flying saucers exist have
produced findings that only tend to prove that UFOs are technologically infeasible by
any known combination of materials and locomotion.
>>
501
>> The next problem facing us is that the momentum imparted to the centrifugal
spoke is carries it all around the cycle with little loss of velocity. The amount of
concentrated centrifugal force carrying the engine in the desired direction is too low
to be practical. Momentum is half the product of mass multiplied by velocity squared.
Therefore, what we need is a spoke that has a tremendous velocity with minimal
mass. They don't make spokes like that for bicycle wheels. A search through the
engineers' catalog however, turns up just the kind of centrifuge we need. An electron
has no mass at rest (you cannot find a smaller minimum mass than that); all it's mass
is inherent in its velocity. So we build an electron raceway in the shape of a doughnut
in which we can accelerate an electron to a speed close to that of light. As the speed
of light is approached, the energy of acceleration is converted to a momentum
approaching infinity. As it happens, an electron accelerator answering our need was
developed by the Unive …
>>
>> We can visualize the operation of the Mark I from what is known about particle
accelerators. To begin with, high energy electrons ionize the air surrounding them.
This causes the betatrons to glow like an annular neon tube.
>>
>> The peculiar property of microwaves heating all material containing the water
molecule means that any animal luckless enough to be nearby may be cooked from
the inside out; vegetation will be scorched where a saucer lands; and any rocks
containing water of crystallization will be blasted. Every housewife with a microwave
knows all this; only hard-headed scientists and soft-headed true believers are
completely dumbfounded.
>>
>> UFOnauts would be cooked by their own engines, too, if they left the flight deck
without shielding. This probably explains why a pair of UFOnauts, in a widely
published photograph, wear reflective plastic jumpsuits. Mounting the betatrons
outboard on a disc is an efficient way to get them away from the crew's compartment,
and the plating of the hull shields the interior. At high accelerations, increasing
amounts of power are transformed into radiation, making the centrifugal drive
inefficient in strong gravitational fields. The most practical employment of this
engineering is for large spacecraft, never intended to land. The flying saucers we see
are very likely scouting craft sent from mother ships moored in orbit. For brief
periods of operation, the heavy fuel consumption of the Mark I can be tolerated, along
with radiation leakage - especially when the planet being scouted is not your own.
>>
>> Examples:
>>
>> Mark I - Electronic centrifuges mounted around a fixed disc, outboard. Mark II Electronic centrifuges mounted outboard around a rotating disc. Mark III - Electronic
centrifuges mounted outboard around a rotating disc, period of cycles tuned to
harmonize with ley lines, for jet assist. Mark IV - Particle centrifuge tuned to modify
time coordinates by faster than light travel. Mark V - No centrifuge. Solid state coils
and crystal harmonics transforms ambient field directly for dematerialization and
rematerialization at destinations in time and space.
>>
>> Essentially, a large rotating disk has a smaller rotating disc on one side of the
main driving axle. The two wheels are geared together so that a weight mounted on
the rim of the smaller wheel is always at the outside of the larger wheel during the
same length of arc of each revolution, and always next to the main axle during the
502
opposite arc. What happens is that the velocity of the weight is amplified by harmonic
coincidence with the large rotor during one half of its period of revolution, and
diminished during the other half cycle. This concentrates momentum in the same
quarter continually, to rectify the centrifuge. The result is identical to my Hyperspace
Drive, but has the beauty of continuously rotating motion. Now, if the D. drive is
made with a huge main rotor, - like about thirty feet in diameter - there is enough
room to mount a series of smaller wheels around the rim, set in gimbals >> for
attitude control, and Mr. D. himself has himself a model T Flying Saucer requiring no
license from the AEC.
>>
>> In 1975, Professor E. L., Head of the Department of Electrical Engineering at the
Imperial College of Science and Technology in London, England, invented another
approach to harnessing the centrifugal force of a gyroscope to power an antigravity
engine - well, he almost invented it, but he did not have the sense to hold onto success
when he grasped it. Professor L. is world-renowned for his most creative solutions to
the problems of magnetic-levitation-propulsion systems, and the fruit of his brain is
operating today in Germany and Japan, his railway trains float in the air while
traveling at over three hundred miles per hour. If anyone can present the world with a
proven anti gravity engine, it must be the professor.
>>
>> L. satisfied himself that the precessional force causing a gyroscope to wobble had
no reaction. This is a clear violation of N.'s Third Law of Motion as 'generally
conceived'. L. figured that if he could engage the precessional acceleration while the
gyroscope wobbled in one direction and release the precession while it wobble in
other directions, he would be able to demonstrate to a forum of colleagues and critics
at the college a rectified centrifuge that worked as a proper antigravity engine. His
insight was sound but he did not work it out right. All he succeeded in demonstrating
was a 'separation between action and reaction,' and his engine did nothing but
oscillate violently. Unfortunately, neither L. or his critics were looking for a temporal
separation between action and reaction, so the loophole he proved in N.'s Third Law
was not noticed. Everyone was looking for action without reaction, so no one saw
anything at all. Innumerable other inventors have constructed engines essentially
identical to L.'s …
>>
>> Another invention described is U.S. Patent disclosure number 3,653,269, granted
to R. F., a retired chemical engineer in Louisiana. F. mounted his gyroscopes around
the rim of a large rotor disc, like a two cylinder flying saucer. Every time the rotor
turns a half cycle, the precessional twist of the gyros in reaction generates a powerful
force. During the half cycle when F.'s gyros were twisting in the other direction, his
clutch grabbed and transmitted the power to the driving wheels. During the other half
cycle, the gyros twisted freely. F. claims his machine traveled four miles per hour
until it flew to pieces from centrifugal forces. After examining the patents, I agreed
that it looked like it would work, and it certainly would fly to pieces because the
bearing mounts were not nearly strong enough to contain the powerful twisting forces
his machine generated. F.'s design, however, cannot be included among antigravity
engines because it would not operate off the ground. He never claimed it would, and
F. a …
>>
>> What L. needed was another rotary component, like the D. drive, geared to his
engine's oscillations so that they would always be turned to drive in the same
direction. As it happens, an Italian by the name of Todeschini recently secured a
503
patent on this idea, and his working model is said to be attracting the interest of
European engineers.
>>
>> When the final rectifying device is added to the essential L. design, all the moving
parts generate the vectors of a vortex, and the velocity generated is the axial thrust of
the vortex. Therefore I call inventions based on this design the Vortex Drive.
>>
>> By replacing the Hyperspace modules of the Mark I Flying Saucer with Vortex
modules, still retaining the essential betatron as the centrifuge, performance is
improved for the Mark II. To begin with, drive is generated only when the main rotor
is revolving, so the saucer can be parked with the motor running. This eliminates the
agonizing doubt we all suffered when the Lunar Landers were about to blast off to
rejoin the command capsule: Will the engine start? This would explain why the ring
of lights around the rim of a saucer is said to begin to revolve immediately prior to lift
off. A precessional drive affords a wider range of control, and the responses are more
stable than a direct centrifuge. But the most interesting improvement is the result of
the 'structure' of the electromagnetic field generated by the Vortex drive. By
amplifying and diminishing certain vectors harmonically, the Mark III flying saucer
can ride the electromagnetic current of the Earth's electromagnetic field like the jet
stream. And thi …
>>
>> The flying saucer consumes fuel at a rate that cannot be supplied by all the wells
in Arabia. Therefore we have to assume that UFO engineers must have developed a
practical atomic fusion reactor. But once the Mark III is perfected, another fuel
supply becomes attainable, and no other is so practical for flying saucer. The Moray
Valve converts the Mark III into a Mark IV Flying Saucer by extending its
operational capabilities through 'time' as well as space. The Moray Valve, you see,
functions by changing the direction of flow of energy in the Sun's gravitational field.
It is the velocity of energy that determines motion, and motion determines the flow of
time.
>>
>> Dr. M. R., President of the University for Social Research, published a paper
describing the discoveries of Dr. P. A. Biefeld, astronomer and physicist at the
California Institute for Advanced Studies, and his assistant, T. B.. In 1923 Biefeld
discovered that a heavily charged electrical condensor moved toward its positive pole
when suspended in a gravitational field. He assigned B. to study the effect as a
research project. A series of experiments showed B. that the most efficient shape for a
field propelled condensor was a disc with a central dome. In 1926 T. published his
paper describing all the construction features and flight characteristics of a flying
saucer, conforming to the testimony of the first flight witnessed over Mount Rainer
twenty-one years later and corroborated by thousands of witnesses since. (The
Biefeld-Brown Effect explains why a Mark III rides the electromagnetic jet stream.)
>>
>> We may speculate that flying saucers spotted from time to time may not only
include visitors from other planets and travelers through time, but also fledglings
from an unknown number of cuckoo's nests in secret experimental plants all over the
world. The space program at Cape Canaveral may be nothing more than a
supercolossal theatre orchestrated by Cecil B. Demille to reassure Americans that
they are still 'numero uno' after Russia beat our atomic ace by putting Sputnik into
orbit. We need not doubt that the Apollo spaceships got to the Moon, but we may
wonder if Neil Armstrong was the first man to land there. The real space program
504
may have been conducted in secret as a spin-off from the Manhattan Project since the
end of World War II, and Apollo 13 may have been picked up by a sag wagon to
make sure our team scored a home run every time they went to bat. The exploration
of space is the most dangerous enterprise ever taken on by a living species. Don't you
ever wonder why the Russians are losing men in spac …
>>
>> The following article was published as a two part series in the February and
March issues of "The UFO Enigma". This is the newsletter of the UFO Study Group
of Greater St. Louis, Inc.
>>
>> http://www.theorderoftime.com/science/sciences/articles/saucer.html
S-305. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL reporting he received the books
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: Australian lasers violate second law of thermodynamics ...
Date : Mon, 22 Jul 2002 19:03:01 -0700
GOT 'EM!! LOOKS GREAT!
Did you send a copy to Barnes & Noble? Just checking. Don't want to send two! I noticed you have
"Star Shots Studio" listed for promo books. Sure we couldn't buy the publishing equipment to mass
produce books for sale? Of course we need a marketing group. I am receiving orders for books already!
we are contacting University of Washington and Oregon State U. Have any schools, universities and/or
colleges around your location?
S-306. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail to Yosharini Minami regarding the
Aero book
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: Re: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics Aero Promotion Book
Date : Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:05:53 -0700
>> ----- Original Message ---->>> From: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>>> To: <y-minami@pq.jp.nec.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:59 PM
>>> Subject: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics Aero Promotion Book
>>>
>>> Yoshinari:
>>>
>>> Please email me your current mailing address to send you a copy of our book
that I mentioned to you about earlier. I think you will be impressed. We have
contacted Barnes & Noble, Morris and other publishers to publish our book. We
505
have 45 promo copies of our aero book and we will hopefully sell enough copies
to build our prototype from the profits. All looks great! as soon as you give me
the current address I will send you a book. It has some of your brilliant material
from one of your JBIS publications that I asked you for permission about adding
to our book earlier. We want to have the book published in Japanese also.
>>>
>>> We are very proud of the book and it will also give you credit for your
valuable and important input on MQT. It is only for promotion purposes only and
we are sending the book to you for your review and following input. We think
you will enjoy the book very much!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Larry
>At 05:13 PM 7/23/02 +0900, you wrote:
>> Dear Larry,
>>
>> I am very glad to hear that you published the book. I look forward to receiving the
book soon. My summer vacation is from Aug.3 to Aug.12.
>>
>> mailing address:
>>
>> Yoshinari Minami
>> NEC Patent Service, Ltd.
>> 5-11, Shibaura 4-Chome, Minato-Ku, Tokyo 108-0023, JAPAN
> To: y-minami@pq.jp.nec.com
> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> Subject: Re: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics Aero Promotion Book
>
> Yoshinari:
>
> Thank you. I too am very ecstatic and overjoyed with the way the book is put together by Mark
McWilliams with the few resources and equipment he had at his disposal. Of course there are a few
minor changes that need to be made, but that can easily be taken care of in the final publication by
the professional book publisher. The book has several color illustrations and pictures in it so that it
is eye-appealing; especially the cover which is very exciting and colorful to catch the eye of a book
browser.
>
> We are willing to offer you copies of the book at a reduced rate so that perhaps you could assist us
in marketing the book in Japan. Perhaps it might be easier if you could oversee the translation of the
book into Japanese so that the scientific wording is correct in the translation process. We think that
many people, scientific institutions, schools, colleges and universities in Japan and America will
want to order our books for students and researchers. This is an excellent way for us to acquire
money to build and test our prototypes, Yoshinari. At any rate, you can make some extra money for
yourself by marketing the book in Japan. Perhaps you could also promote our book on Japanese TV
shows if you like. So far, virtually everyone I have shown the book to has really expressed their
opinion that they like the book and everyone wants a book to have for themselves. The main thing I
want to express is that all the profits made from selling our books are to go directly into constructing
506
and testing prototypes. Because of the situation of the economy, this is the only way we have to be
able to build our prototypes.
>
> I will be sending you a book tomorrow via airmail. You should receive it about the time you
return from your vacation. I hope you have an enjoyable vacation, Yoshinari. Please let me know by
e-mail when you receive the book.
>
> Regards,
> Larry
S-307. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding afterthoughts on the promotional Aero edition
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: hints and tidbits
Date : Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:30:31 -0700
At 06:57 AM 7/23/02 -0400, you wrote:
>
> I forgot ... I did send out one other copy to Andrew Potter in Cincinnati.
>
> Take this with a grain of salt because I'm no salesman or marketing expert. I'm inclined to
think you'd sell more to the average person on-the-street through a mall bookstore than at a
college campus where the kids are inundated with technical books anyway and look to party - not ready more. But here you'd have to rely on the advice of those in-the-know.
>
> My limited role -- similar to what I did in the photo/recording studio -- was to take an
amateur with great talent to the next (semi-pro) level. In your case it was taking your great
manuscript and transforming it into a pseudo-book. It would be better received by your peers
as well as people in the publishing industry (which isn't fair as they should judge by content
and not appearances). I'm hoping Paul is impressed enough to redouble his efforts to
promote your concepts with those down his way. I don't know if those researchers working
in private think tanks could use this to convince their supervisors to looking at your stuff
more seriously. In the end it wouldn't surprise me if you didn't get stuck with having to get
an "agent" to promote this to publishers and distributors.
>
> Feel free to change anything in the book. Afterall, it's your book. I just put stuff in -"publisher", "copyright statements", etc. -- to make it look like a real book. I didn't know the
exact titles of your other books and films so I just "winged it" (your expression). I sent you
the complete set of MS-Word files on CD that were used to make the different sections.
They were split up because I noticed that with "background saving" turned 'ON', MS-Word
takes forever to allow changes to a certain large .doc file. Your's are large because of all the
images. (If it were one large document, you'd need a supercomputer to edit it.)
>
> Usually the page numbers are set automatically within each file starting with whatever
number I gave it. In certain sections I used "section breaks" rather than "page breaks" to let
me hardcode page numbers. (For example, this was done in the beginning to let me use page
number "iii", "iv", "v", etc.) Note that some of the Figures use text boxes (sometimes
invisible) to conceal stray lines, hard-to-read captions, etc. I tried to print these off and scan
507
them back in so I could eliminate any embedded text boxes. But frequently the details on the
original figures were so minute and fine that re-scanning them was in effect making a "copy
of a copy" and I suffered a generation loss in quality. So I left the things in there. I doubt
they would convert properly if someone blindly transformed the MS-Word file into Adobe
.pdf format. You would have to print-off/scan-in at that point.
>
> Notice the special 90-lb paper that I used. Actually that ream is a few years old. They
make the same weight paper with a shinier glossier surface now, maybe for the new laser
photocopiers. What I noticed is that it increases smudges and smears if the copying isn't
perfect. On the top or bottom of the package is a label with a little red arrow. You should
always put the paper the supply tray with that side pointed up. When you print "duplex" -i.e., front and back -- I found that regardless of what the copier promises about automatic
duplexing, it's more apt to jam. The heat causes this paper to curl longitudinally. I have
found it better to print one side at-a-time, then take those copies and fold them counter to the
furl, then turn them upside down in the supply tray to use for printing on the backside. Of
course this is done at the expense of a lot more manual effort and consumes a great deal of
time. And the copiers still jam and occasionally … …
>
> For some reason these copiers at times will grab two sheets but only print on one. So
instead of having 25 copies of one page, you really only have 24. I have to collate all the
pages by hand, all 160 pages/book x 25 books! That takes an entire evening, but it will catch
pages that weren't printed. And my spiral comb binder can only punch 5 pages max. at-atime. So I have to hand separate small bunches of pages from any given stack to punch and
place in a pile for later comb inserting. I'm not going to discuss lamination of front and back
covers here.
>
> It will take the greater part of a weekend to make 25 copies. A professional establishment
can probably make 1,000 copies in 3 hours. Plus their ink doesn't smear (as compared to a
laser toner cartidge). The downside is the initial cost as they have to make master plates for
each page. The actual paper cost is negligible. I mention this as I don't want to get into the
mass publishing business (unless someone buys me some of this professional equipment).
That's why I was advocating using these limited copies to stir interest and hopefully attract
backers to promote them on a grandeur scale (as well as to cause financiers like "Felix" to
take a second look at your patents and proposals). Used in this role, these limited copies will
be a "force multiplier" (like an AWACS is in air combat, allowing a small fighter force to do
the job of a much larger one).
>
> You are the final judge of course, but I think you might want to add some more stuff to
some of the skimpier chapters. But it's your call ... they could be okay as it now stands. I
sent what I feel is the corrected equations for pages 95 and 96 yesterday along with an
updated CD containing the MS-Word code. Before you print these off en masse, you
probably want to get someone like Yoshi or Hal to go over the equations. Plus that one
paragraph at the end of page 96 referencing "T2-star" just hangs there. Where is the equation
for T2-star? Why even mention it? It serves no purpose. Little things like that which others
might pick up on.
>
> Maybe you can add things to this book which will cross-reference all of the books. For
instance, if the reader wants to learn more about the history of the CdTe crystallites and
different attempts to grow them, that is contained in the HOLO-1 book.
>
508
> Hopefully I can do the same pseudo-publication thing with "Flying Colors". The readers
shouldn't need to be as well-versed in quantum physics to appreciate that story. Between the
two of them -- one high-tech and the other a real-life X-files -- I think you're off to a great
start to interim surviving on your feet without a day job and while waiting for funding.
>
> -- :Later,
> -- Mark
Mark:
Thanks for your hard work and sending a book to Andy. Now I am wondering what price is fair to sell
the book at and about what price we should figure in for the publisher for each book. At first I thought
$20 per book to publish and sell them for $59.95. Now I am wondering if that figure is too high?
Perhaps $49.95? $39.95? Is the $20 per book to publish to high? Too low? What do you think?
I was told by David Carter yesterday when I gave him his book as he is an investor into UNITEL and
works for Intel here in Portland area at the management level and wants a copy of HOLO-1 to show
upper management at R&D to hopefully get their attention to invest. I told him that we are putting
together an equally good copy of HOLO-1 as our aerospace book.
Dave went on to say that we should get Michael to do a book review on Art Bell and that we should
instantly sell as many as 60,000 books overnight. Tim Ventura has been on the Art Bell radio show
twice and he says the last time he got 30,000 hits within one hour after he was on the Art Bell show.
Now, even Tim wants to promote UNITEL with his lifter (which works from the Biefield-BrownTownsend effect that Mike Miller simply describes the effect of how it is related to our design in that
electrons "chase" holes or positrons) which he has an article in Wired magazine and has several TV and
radio shows he is invited to. We could be there with him to promote our book. We will do the same as
in all adds; "allow 6 to 8 weeks for delivery". That would give us plenty of time to get the books
published, etc. We will have an add-up on our web site soon to sell the books. We need to get a Visa
and/or American Express card accounts so that we can take on orders for our books. Any input on that?
I am going to get together with Mike soon to finalize "Flying Colors". Mike just had an interview and
an article done on him and UNITEL on Mike's local neighborhood newsletter "Blachly-Lane Journal". I
will send you a copy when I get some copies for myself. In it he talks about our sightings. The time is
ripe for our book! I smell "No.1 Best Seller" if done right! Lets take a crack at it aye? We can mix in a
lot from our current aero prop book and the forthcoming HOLO-1 book as well. We 3 should have done
this years ago!!!
Best,
Larry
S-308. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the HOLO-1 Quantum Computer book
From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: miscellaneous thoughts
Date : Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:47:48 -0700
509
Hi Mark:
I have been sending the books off to key people and book publishers to get orders up and running. The
main thing is our book is on its way to Tokyo as we write. I hope we make it big in Japan as Scientific
American magazine won't even know what hit them! That way, we will have much money to create our
own illustrations, build prototypes, etc.
Have a request from Dave Carter, a UNITEL investor that works for Intel who wants a copy of HOLO-1
to show management at Intel R&D Corp. Div. I am thinking of a HOLO-1 book that can have much
illustrations and other related materials contained within the book so that it will be large enough to be
considered worthy enough for people to buy the book HOLO-1. I mean I have tons of quantum, NMR,
photon and all other related versions such as "Spin" storage & retrieval of information.
Should we give it a go Cholo?! :-) I know you are probably tired and need a break but at least we have
food for thought here, Mark! I have also been thinking of finishing up Flying Colors and the medical
book too! All of these of course can also be translated into Japanese and published in Japan. The more
irons we have in the fire, the more of a chance we have to make money so that we can build our
prototypes; the ultimate "Showstopper"!!
All of these fickle investors can continue to sit on their butts and watch us dump our profits into building
our prototypes; and upon successful working prototypes, they can all just "read 'em and weep"!!. Lord
O'Lightning, Mark! I can't wait for that glorious day!! Can you imagine? Think of how we shall
accelerate transportation, medicine, computers, etc. into the "Starfleet" mode of operandi!! Of course
you know how many sudden friends and fellow workers will pop up and say "I always believed in you
that you would make it someday". SCREW THAT!! You will have a place "on the bus" (sort of
speaking) because of your hard and dedication. It's people like you, Andy Moore, and others that have
helped us get to where we are today. Everybody else can take a flying leap!
See inserts below for my response:
> Larry :
>
> (1) Pertaining to the "notes_x" attachments I sent you yesterday, the "notes_2" applies to
the next batch of books you'll receive Monday or Tuesday. I saw some Figures which
needed "cleaned-up" in the first batch and did so in the second batch. Those touch-ups
weren't made to the batch you just received. (But the "notes_1" text-boxes were made to
both the first and second batches.)
>
> (2) At some pint in time you have to get the book copyrighted. Legally, whenever you
create something it is automatically copyrighted. However, to pursue copyright infringement
damages in a court of law, it is nearly impossible without a certificate-of-copyright
registration with the U.S. Copyright Office. The forms are in .pdf format and downloadable.
You have to send in $30 with the forms and a copy of the book. They don't want a CD or
tape or other electronic media. But the forms are so damn complicated! And it takes 5 to 9
months before you're hear from them, and even then that answer might be they need more
information. It's almost less of a headache to find an attorney who has done copyright
registrations. He'll charge you through-the-nose but knows the ropes. Of course, a publisher
has their own in-house attorneys that can do this.
>
510
> (3) One drawback to making a retail version of a MQT simulation computer game is that
you have to do a lot of research and programming up-front before selling the disc. What if
new technologies or discoveries are made 3 months after you sell the first edition?
No comprendo, Senor!! We are just going to go for it with Andy at the helm of the game design,
implementation, marketing, etc. (if you know what I mean Captain!!).
> If you had this available as an on-line simulation, then changes could be made daily if
needed. Users would log onto to your server with a credit-card and be billed for each Meg of
bandwidth. That might be the way to go, although I'm not an expert in on-line computer
gaming.
>
True, but I am leaving that up to Mr. A to deal with as it is his "little pork chop" and he can
deal with it as I am dealing with book sales and marketing.
>
>
> Also you could add a second option. Instead of just MQTing around the universe, how
about simulating RIFE and orgone effects on the human physiology. Sort of like a "Sim
City" game except this is on the effects of biomagnetics on the human body. There are
several Yahoo! groups devoted to this. You could attract devotees from the medical
community where the MQT stuff would attract from the aerospace and physics crowd. And
being on-line, you could update daily. Perhaps have a section where you "plug" usersubmitted models into the overall simulation. I could see where a mix of game-players and
pseudo-researchers would be using the on-line version.
Sounds good. However, I will leave that up to Mr. A: i.e,."He grew it, He'll chew it!" Better yet; "He
baked it; He can sell it!"
> (4) I'm sure you've given thought to sending investing companies a copy, such as RollsRoyce, Honda, NEC, etc. I don't know if the Nigerians are an option or not. I'd hate for you
to send out the few copies you have to those who find it interesting but whose hands are tied
and nothing will ever come of it in the way of grants.
No way, Jose!! Not in a million-zillion years!!! Those pesky Nigerians are probably more trustworthy
than RR, Boeing, IBM, Honda, etc. at this point in the game. Somebodies running scared at the SEC
State of Oregon, Boeing, IBM, Intel and so forth! One successful prototype and its all over baby blue!!!
Vini-Vidi-Vicci, Mark!! Their days are numbered my friend! Just like the 8-track, slide-rule, black &
white TV, we are coming for them! Whom does the bell toll for"? It tolls for thee (powers that beoil/rocket boys) McGee!!
Best,
Larry
S-309. from Lori Cordini regarding Carol Rutz' unfortunate experiences with "Black Ops"
programs
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 12:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Lori Cordini" <loricordini@yahoo.com> | This is Spam | Add to Address Book
Subject: Re: [SO] Operation Paperclip update & expose
511
To: "stealthskaters" <stealthskaters@yahoo.com>
A very good read: "A Nation Betrayed". A true story by someone who for a lifetime was used and
abused by the "black ops programs" of the 1950s. Written by Carol Rutz. An honest and strong woman
who is recovering from the torture and the pain. My story is peanuts compared to what this lady went
through. Her courage is admirable!
-lori
S-310. from Andrew Potter regarding a virus that seemed to target UNITEL
From : Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : The Full Story
Date : Mon, 07 Oct 2002 02:16:40 -0400
--- stealthskaters <stealthskaters@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Janes Defence reporter Nick Cook's expose on 'Operation Paperclip' and the capture of
Nazi "Wonder Weapon" scientists to work for the U.S. in exchange for protection from War
Crimes trials. It shows how some of the SS politics "tagged along" with the new science and
found its way into today's Black Budget and anti-gravity flight research. =>
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/interviews/int2002-09-05.htm
>
> Also an excellent history of and current progress in understanding the Casimir force and its
theoretical promises of allowing the ZPE/QVF field to be tapped into for over-unity energy
=> http://physicsweb.org/article/world/15/9/6 .
>
> For future reference, I added both of these links to my site at
http://www.stealthskater.com/Science.htm . (I also have them in MS-Word format and
can make those available as downloadable .doc files if anyone needs that.)
Mark,
Thankyou for giving me Larry's number. This isn't over yet but I think it will be soon. Here was the
message I first received:
> Return-Path: <"B.G."@email.lviv.ua>
> Received: from cliff.msbb.uc.edu (cliff.edw2.uc.edu [10.23.1.159])
> by email.msbb.uc.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id XAA21016
> for <potterae@email.uc.edu>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 23:04:21 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from innovations.dsinw.com (IDENT:root@ns.dsinw.com [207.149.40.194])
> by cliff.msbb.uc.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id UAA16213
> for <potterae@email.uc.edu>; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 20:10:12 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from mauser (14-105.021.popsite.net [66.217.132.105])
> by innovations.dsinw.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g942XIZ19325;
> Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:33:18 -0700
512
> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:33:18 -0700
> Message-Id: <200210040233.g942XIZ19325@innovations.dsinw.com>
> From: "B.G."@email.lviv.ua>
> Subject: AW: Splitting Electrons
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------9D3NM9IJ9V4ZP4"
> X-UIDL: 1c6e8ba1fbd91667ae23c4b6e355cb04
>
> Dear Larry,
>
> I have very good news. Yesterday, the head of our department (Dr. R.) forwarded me a call
for proposals from the Strategic Research Center. He asked me to make proposals. I will do.
>
> The following infos are confidential so please do not forward to anyone this mail. We will
have a meeting with Sir Roger Penrose discussing the results of the coming AIAA/NASA
BPP meeting. You may remember that my Fibonacci Flying Wing has the exact geometry of
the non-periodic Penrose Tiling Pattern. It is linked to quasi-crystals.
>
> Now imagine the wing enclosed in a plasma. Then produce some plasma crystals in a nonneutral plasma (e.g. with your device). One can imagine a Macroscopic state of coherence
where all particles act as being one. This would lead to a Macroscopic cold neutrino
scattering accompanied with some dramatic effects. There is a paper by Prof. Aharonov and
Prof. Casher on anomalous neutrino scattering from crystals. You (UNITEL) and me have
very similar ideas.
>
> Now we have funds to make things real. So I kindly ask you to send a proposal. You
should state one copy to me when sending the proposal to Dr. H. R. This is important.
>
> Best regards,
> "B.G."
I first searched for information on the virus, and found this page:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.bugbear@mm.html
This is the most important paragraph in that page:
"It then uses its own SMTP engine to send itself to all email addresses that it finds. The worm also
can construct addresses for the "From:" field using information that it harvests from the infected
computer. For example, the worm may find the addresses a@a.com, b@b.com, and c@c.com. The
worm could create an email message addressed to a@a.com and spoof the "From:" address, so that it
appears to come from c@b.com. The spoofed address can also be a valid email address that the
worm finds on the system."
But I wouldn't know this until later. Then my friend Will Lambeth and I searched for information on
"B.G.". This is some of the info we found:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics/messages/394
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics/messages/1130
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/lfreplog2.htm
513
"B.G." graduated from the University of Berlin with a degree in Physics.
Next I e-mailed Larry. Here was his response:
>
> Andrew; FYI
>
> If "B.G." is playing some kind of vindictive shithead games (he is Turkish Islamic in
Germany) because I kind of went over his head by contacting Dr. E. W., Director, research, RR,
London, UK, I am going to have his head on a platter! Why did he send out this bad virus to all
these people? Why would he jeopardize his position at RR in doing so by involving Dr. R. I
mean if I find out from Dr. Williams that Dr. R. is one of "B.G."'s cronies or the man retired or is
dead.... "B.G."'s ass is mine!!! I will make certain he is fired or worse.
>
> I sincerely hope that the virus is just a circumstance but why did "B.G." send the email to you
and several others connected with UNITEL and ask not to forward it (maybe he knew that the
email was infected and felt bad about forwarding it).... I had a hard time sleeping last night
thinking about this virus thing because before I heard from you I was thinking that Paul Kirsch
and Doug Starfield are of the Jewish persuasion. Doesn't make sense unless he meant ill will to
UNITEL and its people. I am emailing Dr. W. to get his opinion. I shall be in touch with you to
let you know what I can find out as I am going to get to the bottom of this. Let me know your
thoughts, Andrew. I am baffled until I hear more from "B.G." and others.
>
> Regards,
> Larry
>>
>> To: "B.G."@email.lviv.ua
>> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>> Subject: UNITEL, Inc.
>>
>> "B.G.":
>>
>> What is going on? Why did you send this very bad virus to all of these people concerning
UNITEL? Please explain as this is a very serious situation. Is Dr. R. aware of this email
message you sent out? I am not sure of which way you want us to contact Dr. R. with our
proposal; his email or regular mail address? Please let me know which way to send it to him.
I would appreciate it. Does your Dept. have our original project proposal that was shelved on
file? Could we reactivate that since it was voted on and passed by RR's technical team (when
we received 7 out of 8 rating)?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Larry Maurer
Shortly afterward the UNITEL website went down.
Then I started analyzing "B.G."'s supposed e-mail address. I visited the http://email.lviv.ua e-mail
domain. It's a Ukranian domain. But the login only has 10 characters and "B.G."'s address has 15. So
the account cannot exist. After this I tried to send a reply to the account ("B.G.") and got a "User
Unknown" message.
514
After that I started looking at the header of the message. The first strange thing I noticed was the
Message-Id. (The originating machine) You can see this is http://innovations.dsinw.com. That's
"Direct Source Internet North West" -- a company based out of Portland.
Next, I compared the e-mail header above to other e-mails sent to me from Larry. Take this one for
instance:
> Return-Path: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> Received: from cliff.msbb.uc.edu (cliff.edw2.uc.edu [10.23.1.159])
> by email.msbb.uc.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA29566
> for <potterae@email.uc.edu>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:02:22 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from innovations.dsinw.com (IDENT:root@ns.dsinw.com [207.149.40.194])
> by cliff.msbb.uc.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id JAA29330
> for <potterae@email.uc.edu>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:09:20 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from mauser.unitelnw.com (09-042.021.popsite.net [66.217.131.42])
> by innovations.dsinw.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8HFnPU14621
> for <potterae@email.uc.edu>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:49:25 -0700
> Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020917085853.02320c30@mail.unitelnw.com>
> X-Sender: lmaurer@unitelnw.com@mail.unitelnw.com
> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:58:56 -0700
> To: potterae@email.uc.edu
> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> Subject: Fwd: RGB laser & charge related paper
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
> X-IMAPbase: 1032293201 1
> X-UIDL: 0a49a561fc96a9a15c97cc3fbb35bbc4
> Status: RO
> X-Status:
> X-Keywords:
> X-UID: 1
The machine mauser is the same, and the IP address is also identical. This means it came from the same
machine/Internet connection.
Next I did a full trace on the e-mail, requesting logs from StarNet -- the ISP used to send the message.
(The logs haven't been sent yet.)
Finally, after re-reading the virus description Saturday, I knew this must have been an accident done by
the virus itself. S I asked you for his number and called him Sunday.
Larry said that he has anti-virus and firewall installed and that he doesn't think his machine could have
done it. But I think the anti-virus must have been out-of-date or not in use because of what happened.
Anyhow, so that's what I've been doing the last few days -Andrew
At 12:36 AM 10/6/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>>From: Andrew Potter
515
>>To: stealthskaters@hotmail.com
>>Subject: Virus Pt. 2
>>Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 00:06:12 -0400
>>
>>I need Larry's number. This virus came from his machine. It was smart enough to
fool us. And it sent out confidential information and infected just about every
UNITEL person. Would you happen to have his number? Thx> telephone: (503) 232-2740
S-311. from Andrew Potter forwarding an e-mail that "the rest of the world is catching up to
UNITEL"
From : Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: Great Website on Quantum Chromodynamics
Date : Fri, 25 Oct 2002 05:36:35 -0400
> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 05:34:26 -0400
> To: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> From: Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
> Subject: Great Website on Quantum Chromodynamics
>
> Larry,
>
found
this
series
of
realplayer
lectures
on
quantum
chromodynamics:
http://wlap.physics.lsa.umich.edu/cern/lectures/academ/2000/webber/ . They have good quality
video/audio, like taking a college course for free.
> -Andrew
> At 08:58 AM 9/17/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>>
>> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:52:04 -0700
>> To: Mike Miller
>> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>> Subject: Fwd: RGB laser & charge related paper
>>
>> Please be advised that the rest of the world has caught up to us. Let's hope they don't pass
us... Hopefully, we will have the necessary funding soon to construct our prototype and
literally produce the Yang-Mills potent EM wells described herein (with QCD interactions).
>>
>>> Cohen M. "Clifford Residues and Charge Quantization."
<http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0207107>http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0207107
>>> X-Originating-IP: [65.168.107.205]
>>> From: "Edward Halerewicz, Jr." <hal_warp@hotmail.com>
>>> To: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
516
>>> Subject: RGB laser & charge related paper
>>> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 15:03:56 -0500
>>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
>>> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Sep 2002 20:06:21.0254 (UTC)
FILETIME=[868EDE60:01C25DBC]
>>> X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
>>>
>>> Larry,
>>>
>>> I recently came upon a quantization paper that I thought you might find very
interesting:
>>>
>>> Cohen M. "Clifford Residues and Charge Quantization."
<http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0207107>http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0207107
>>>
>>> After briefly scanning the link that you provided of your patent, the references
therein help me to get a better grasp of how the laser works. The 1/3 charge appears to
be related to the work of Yang and Mills, I suspect now the 1/3 charge is "color" charge
of quantum chromodynamics, and hence is carried by the Yang-Mills field. As I read
the above paper I came across several terms you use for your design, such as fiber
bundles for example. Its a technical paper however *if* you are all ready familiar with
these concepts it shouldn't be to difficult to grasp.
>>>
>>> Relevant Points:
>>>
>>> *The Yang-Mills field cycles by a period similar to the one for the coherent white
light.
>>> *The propagation of the field rotates (as your laser).
>>> *Increasing the energy of the field creates a contraction in spacetime (similar to
rotating naked singularity concept)
>>> *He finds a relation between this period and electrical charge quantization, this
leads to the Fine Structure Constant and may help how you simulate an electron.
Although the massive over charge of the hull may still be a problem.
>>> *And lastly increasing the amount of energy in the vacuum would increase the
magnetic strength of the field.
>>>
>>> I originally looked at the paper because I thought it may be quantum gravity
related. However as I read it you can see I found several concepts which I thought you
may find interesting.
>>>
>>> -Edward Halerewicz, Jr.
>>> Warp Drive Today
>>> http://da_theoretical1.tripod.com
>>> Web Master: ATPG
>>> http://galileo.spaceports.com/~atpg2
S-312. from Andrew Potter regarding complex quantum computer calculations
517
From : Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Proof of concept with $0.00
Date : Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:42:33 -0500
Mark,
It looks like that link you sent me on "Virtual Proteins" may be a hit. I'd looked at this stuff before, even
used SETI@Home, etc., but I've never thought of applying it to UNITEL. It seems as though one can
create quantum models with computers that accurately reflect nature no matter what your preconceptions may be. Thus we may be able to create a model of HOLO-1 or the spaceship that proves
the design with enough accuracy to woo investors. I'm not going to do much or any programming with
it though. I've suggested making it open source. Or perhaps they'll make enough money with their book
to commercially fund the development.
"Flying Colors" interests me as well. I've read through the first bit of it (the first chapter, the foreward,
etc.) and it didn't seem like the best writing. But it was effective anyways. Nano-engineering is
interesting. I suppose that may work if you could engineer it atom-by-atom. But - it'd probably be
faster just to make sure you used a process whereby the atoms were aligned.
It seems like if we could MQT to a distant world we should be able to withstand their environment.
Don't know though - maybe that's why the Greys haven't taken us over yet eh? ;) Hell, we can
withstand outerspace itself without a spacesuit for a couple minutes. Seems like landing (on an EarthLike world) shouldn't be much different from exploring a new continent.
-Andrew
> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:25:42 -0500
> To: Lhaymo@aol.com,lmaurer@unitelnw.com
> From: Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
> Subject: Re: UNITEL
>
> Larry,
>
> Here's an article I found on Google on quantum simulations:
http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~pdh1001/thesis/node9.html
>
> "Quantum-mechanical calculations stand out because they are by design ab initio i.e. from firstprinciples, calculations. They do not depend upon any external parameters except the atomic
numbers of the constituent atoms to be modeled and cannot therefore be biased by preconceptions
about the final result. Such calculations are reliable and can be used with confidence to predict the
behaviour of nature."
>
> "The computational demands of exact calculations grow exponentially with the size of the system
being studied..."
>
> You may want to get in contact with some of these people (who worked on Folding@Home):
http://folding.stanford.edu/about.html
>
>or perhaps someone from SETI@Home: http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/
>
518
> also if you decide to make it an open-source software, this may be a good site:
http://sourceforge.net/
>
> Personally I don't have any experience with this kind of thing, but good luck>
> -Andrew
>
>At 06:18 PM 10/27/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>
>> Good idea. How do we go about it?
>>
>> At 09:58 PM 10/21/02 -0400, you wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps you could use distributed computing to save money with your prototype
experiment. Or you could create one mean simulation of the spaceship or HOLO-1.
S-313. from Andrew Potter regarding proposed change in UNITEL's marketing strategies
From : Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: Strategies
Date : Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:58:23 -0500
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:57:52 -0500
> To: lmaurer@unitelnw.com
> From: Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
> Subject: Strategies
>
> Larry,
> Mark and I both think UNITEL may benefit from a radical new strategy. We think that creating a
computer simulation of either HOLO-1, the spaceship or processes involved could sway investors
and those "sitting on the fence". This strategy (in theory) doesn't have to cost anything (if done with
volunteers and distributed computing technology), and while you're doing this you can begin
constructing the prototype. We think that this way UNITEL will transition from a design company
to an experimental company, and eventually to a company with products for the consumer.
According to Mithral Cosm:
>
> "The kit should allow a first-year programmer to take an application and make it into a clientserver application in a weekend."
>
> We can use RadVC to do the front-end of the application. It emulates VB in Visual C++. Once
we have the design, we can put in the math for the quantum mechanical, etc, simulations (the hard
part). Then finally we'd put in the networking code, and test it. I could help some.
>
> Mark sent this:
>> X-Originating-IP: [129.71.200.88]
>> From: "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
519
>> To: potterae@email.uc.edu
>> Subject: soliciting prospective publishers
>> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:54:24 -0500
>>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:
28
Oct
2002
16:54:25.0207
(UTC)
FILETIME=[ABCF0C70:01C27EA2]
>> X-IMAPbase: 1035842351 1
>>X-Status:
>> X-Keywords:
>>
>> This guy wants to publish a book but is in the same situation that Larry is in. He
chose
to
solicit
prospective
publishers
at
http://www.stargatechronicles.com/book.html . Don't know if this approach would work at UNITEL's
site.
S-314. from Jack Sarfatti regarding physical Hyperspace vs. the quantum-mental Multiverse
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:37:30 -0800
From: "Jack Sarfatti" <sarfatti@well.com> | This is Spam | Add to Address Book
Subject: RE: [UFO_HOTLINE_BULLETI] just what is this new "magic" science ?
To: "stealthskaters" <stealthskaters@yahoo.com>, UFO_HOTLINE_BULLETI@yahoogroups.com
From my new book (sequel to "A Beautiful Mind" :-)) see http://www.1stbooks.com search author "Jack
Sarfatti"
Herbert Gold “It’s Jack Sarfatti against the World and he’s indomitable. One of his soaring
theories is that things which have not happened yet can cause events in the present …
Already in his possession are the theorems, formula, algebra and poetry for it …. And
citations from Faust.” Bohemia, Where Art, Angt, Love and Strong Coffee Meet, p. 15
(Simon & Schuster, 1993)
Frederick “You are talking about the nonsensical ravings of a lunatic mind.” (Mell Brooks,
"Young Frankenstein")
"A Lunatic Mind? Diary of a Mad Physicist" Episode 3 in Space-Time and Beyond - The
Series
Bell’s locality inequality is that micro-quantum reality must either be nonlocal or nonobjective or both in order to preserve statistical signal locality consistent with the retarded
causality postulate of no effects after causes and no faster than light influences. Bohm’s
hidden variable theory is objective nonlocal. Many worlds “multiverse” theory can be made
local but non-objective in the sense of not being counter-factual definite. That is, anything
that can happen does happen in a parallel quantum wave universe.
This is Murray Gell-Mann’s position in “The Quark and the Jaguar”. You can think of the
many quantum wave worlds of the qubit multiverse as valleys separated by mountains on a
520
thought-like mindscape or landscape. The many quantum wave “qubit” worlds of David
Deutsch’s “multiverse” should not be confounded with the parallel brane worlds of
hyperspace described by Stephen Hawking in “The Universe in a Nutshell”. The rock-like
geometrodynamic brane worlds of hyperspace get their marching orders from the qubit
mental worlds of the multiverse. The multiverse “pilot wave” and the hyperspace brane
worlds (or super hidden variable) together form the post-Bohmian “Super Cosmos”
Most of the big shot mainstream theoretical physics pundits are confused here by Niels
Bohr’s Copenhagen Fairy Tale of The Smoky Dragon and, therefore, do not make the
illuminating distinction because they are unfamiliar with Bohm’s deep ideas. A good
example of this is in the Tuesday, October 29, 2002 Science New York Times “A New View
Of Our Universe: A Self-Reproducing Cosmos” by Dennis Overby. The pictures in that
article are for the material geometrodynamic brane inflated bubbles not the quantum
computing giant pilot wave “wave function of the universe” that David Deutsch is really
talking about in his book “The Fabric of Reality.”
Our visible universe is only a relatively tiny patch ~ 30 billion light years across on a brane
bubble trillions of light years across. However, because of the locally variable zero point
cosmological field in my new theory, we can expect Star Gate Time Travel Machines that
connect different parts of our bubble that are outside each other’s speed of light horizons.
These Star Gates can even connect different bubbles in this Super Cosmos (cosmic mindwave included) allowing trade between different advanced civilizations anywhere-when. This
is the best of all possible scenarios that I call the “Pangloss Alternative” (Voltaire’s
“Candide”). Direct back-action of the rock-like brane worlds on their mental Multiverse pilot
wave landscape awakens consciousness in the Multiverse and this is the “Mind of God” in
Hawking’s sense at the end of “A Brief History of Time”.
S-315. from "Adam" regarding possible psychoactive materials in UFOs
From: RISKER2459@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:46:51 EST
Subject: Re: [SO] just what is this "magic" Science ?!
To: stealthskaters@yahoo.com
I like your work there. Very interesting. I like the idea of these crafts (whatever we may call them)
being "psycho-active" as you put it. That's always been one of my personal favorite explanations, in a
way. Perhaps you'd like to discuss some of your ideas.
What do you think about the possibility that crafts are just that -- psychic materializations from a
higher plane of existence? Maybe not even a higher plane -- just a different one or even this one. This
might sound loony to you, but I've done research on various topics and what struck me most was
research into astral projection. Now this IS leading somewhere, so bear with me . . .
According to most astral projectors, they claim that when "traveling" into the astral realm, that one
appears as a point of light to the permanent "residents" of the astral realm. There are various levels of
the astral realm, some being completely random and subject to our manipulation while others are more
permanent in nature and more closely related to our physical world.
521
I guess it can be thought of this way, my idea. If part of our consciousness or sub-conscious travels
into this astral realm (which is theoretically a different dimension or level of existence), it appears as a
point of light or whatever we might decide it to appear as. Not only that but in that dream realm, it's
exactly that. A dream world. For us, if an astral traveler is skilled, they can weave intricate
environments and do other such things that are otherwise impossible in our physical realm. What if our
physical world is kind of like an astral realm for other beings from other realms of existence?
What I mean is that there are tons of sightings of strange lights and shapes moving around with
impossible maneuvers and mind-boggling speed (in terms of our physical realm), But if these are just
visitors from another realm, who says they are subject to our physical laws (just like an astral traveler is
not subject to physical laws in the astral realm)? These beings might be able to do things in our reality
that seem impossible to us. But that is only because we cannot do such things ourselves.
Imagine what a resident in the astral realm (assuming that there are beings that occupy that realm)
thinks seeing a point of light flying around in their world, speaking to them, doing different tasks, or
materializing into different forms. They would be baffled I assume. It's just sort of my analogy for what
might be the case with some of these mysterious lights and craft. It seems in many cases that UFOs,
aliens, etc. all exhibit out of the ordinary capabilities. So who's to say that our physical laws apply to
them?
And maybe the Government knows this and that's why they don't even bother trying to explain it
scientifically or mechanically. Because perhaps it DOES exceed our physical laws and comprehension.
Perhaps the only way to investigate it thoroughly is to travel to these different levels of existence.
Maybe we just aren't on a plane of existence that would allow us to understand what-the-hell is going
on!
I'd be interested in hearing some more of your ideas. Nothing is better than sharing ideas. I don't
need facts; conjecture is good enough for me -- haha. It's rather fun to take various approaches to things.
For me, wondering is more fun that knowing.
-Adam
S-316. from Bruce Maccabee regarding UFO science and origins
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:42:08 -0500
From: "bruce maccabee" <brumac@compuserve.com> | This is Spam | Add to Address Book
Subject: [SO] just what is this "magic" science ?!
To: "stealthskaters" <stealthskaters@yahoo.com>
>
> The Bentwaters and Puerto Rico reports of UFOs "exploding" or "combining" into entirely
different objects continue to haunt me. More than mere "morphing", as multiple objects were
created from just one. I used to think they tunneled into some "extra" dimension and others
came out to take their place. But I'm not so sure anymore if they are somehow "organic" or
consciously-manipulated "thought-into-matter". Just because our science doesn't understand
how such a thing could be possible doesn't mean some advanced substance could not be
"psycho-active" (for lack of a better term). The only "proof" I offer to this postulation is the
same statement repeated many times by world-class researchers about an "impossible-to522
comprehend alien science". I'm just grasping at straws here -- who am I to offer a solution to
what confounds the sum total of all Earthly science -- and bringing it to the readers' attention
for discussion.
The bottom line is we don't know what-the-heck. is going on. We don't know enough to understand what
they do. Understanding means the possibility for control. We are scared because we don't know enough
to be in control. Because we are scared we try to live while ignoring "it" (UFOs/AFI's/OI's).
Everyone wants control (afraid to relinquish control because one doesn't know what could happen part
of self-preservation). To admit that UFOs/AFIs/OIs are real and messing around in our lives is
tantamount to admitting we have no control over the really 'big" things in life that effect everyone. We
knew this anyway, as far as natural/unintelligent phenomena are concerned, such as hurricanes,
earthquakes, etc. But the admission that OIs are traveling around doing their thing injects another
element of uncertainty into life, and uncertainty means loss of control.
AFI - alien flying craft
OI - Other Intelligence
S-317. from John Schnurer (JNL Labs) regarding quantum-based "theories"
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 14:49:12 -0500 (EST)
From: "John Schnurer" <herman@antioch-college.edu>
To: "stealthskaters" <stealthskaters@yahoo.com>, "Schnurer" <herman@antioch-college.edu>
CC: newelectrogravity@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [newelectrogravity] "physical" Hyperspace vs. the "mental-quantum" Multiverse
Dear StealthSkater,
Quantum Theory is just that: Theory. This is NOT law or rule. In general, the main thing quantum
theory can do for the user is the following:
QT MAY permit the user to predict the position and-or physical locations and some aspect of behavior
of subatomic particles and-or-some atoms in SOME cases.... SOME of the time.... and ONLY if certain
rigid parameters and conditions are adhered to.
Many people think cosmological theory, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics and the related
mathematical theories are fact and/or Law. This is simply not true.
Further, many post and texts have been derived from reading the work of others and-or are the product
of education and-or parroting and I use the term "education". Very, very loosely in this context
education for and from Internet and lay press and pseudo-science popular press. The readers and
purveyors of this Urban/sub-Urban, electronic mail and graphics semi-education frequently use words,
terms and theories that have been at the best misrepresented, are frequently out of context and searches
for the background of same on Google and similar engines locates more of the same electronicinformation-Urban-Legend malrepresented vapor-truth.
It is not a bad idea to ask some of the posters to define the terms they are using and supply references of
and for the source or sources of the statements.
523
If you dig into the science and become able to understand it, you will usually find the truth is far, far
more interesting and powerful than the Internet-Press/Pseudo-Science is or can be if for no other reason
than the information can become the beginning of further work.
AND the 'further work' and advances may come from you. The primary advances of the sciences for the
greater majority come from:
(A)
Individuals and-or small groups
(B)
those who are NOT in the given field
(C)
big-tech does not equal big cost
Many of the "often posting" and expert-sounding have not done their own background learning.
JH
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, stealthskaters wrote:
> Being a physics layperson, I was always confused about Hawking's "Wave Function of the
Universe", the Multiverse, "Hyperspace" described by 10/11-dimensional superstring and Mbrane theories, and in general how the "mental-quantum aspects" can govern/influence physicalor-time events. I received an e-mail from Dr. Jack Sarfatti that offered an explanation. Its
applicability to so-called "StarGate" machines may be why UFO-like technology is so
formidable to our science:
>
>> "… This is Murray Gell-Mann's position in "The Quark and the Jaguar". You can
think of the many quantum wave worlds of the qubit Multiverse as valleys separated by
mountains on a thought-like mindscape or landscape. The many quantum wave "qubit"
worlds of David Deutsch's "Multiverse" should not be confounded with the parallel
brane worlds of hyperspace described by Stephen Hawking in "The Universe in a
Nutshell". The rock-like geometrodynamic brane worlds of hyperspace get their
marching orders from the qubit mental worlds of the Multiverse. The Multiverse "pilot
wave" and the hyperspace brane worlds (or super hidden variable) together form the
post-Bohmian "Super Cosmos" …"
S-318. from Jack Sarfatti regarding his archive of previously-lost UFO documents
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 10:22:47 -0800
From: "Jack Sarfatti" <sarfatti@well.com> | This is Spam | Add to Address Book
Subject: RE: http://www.usafa.af.mil/dfp/physsurf/ link to Stardrive
To: "Gary S. Bekkum" <garysbekkum@hotmail.com>
CC: "SarfattiScienceSeminar@YahooGroups. com" <SarfattiScienceSeminar@yahoogroups.com>,
"ItalianPhysicsCenter" <ItalianPhysicsCenter@YahooGroups.com>
-----Original Message----> From: Gary S. Bekkum [mailto:garysbekkum@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 10:50 AM
> To: sarfatti@well.com
> Subject: http://www.usafa.af.mil/dfp/physsurf/ link to Stardrive
>
524
> http://www.usafa.af.mil/dfp/physsurf/
Yes, I know. Thanks.
I have cleaned up http://stardrive.org/title.shtml for faster loading and also added some new links and
fixed the kaput ISSO link from Joe’s disaster.
My gr-qc paper “The Macro-Quantum Vacuum” http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0211011 should be public
later today or by tomorrow.
I am # 5 in the pipeline judging from this AM up to 0211006. The request for password is temporary –
time for author (e.g. me in this case) to make changes etc. Part of the process.
Unless this paper is shot down for some stupid error I do not yet see, it is the dawn of a new day for
“metric engineering” of stargates and warp drive and the whole UFO enigma veiled in a fog of
disinformation and misinformation.
Part of the archive of lost documents from 70’s & 80’s I found on Oct 26, 2002 will be in
http://stardrive.org/Jack/coverSTB.jpg .
The current status of series
http://www.1stbooks.com .
of
books
I
am
writing
can
be
checked
on
database
I will be doing at least 2 books per year judging from current backlog of information including a
“journal” commenting on important e-print papers in Physics that I am doing with Saul-Paul Sirag as
part of the ISEP Theoretical Physics Group.
Now working on Episode 3 of Space-Time and Beyond – The Series, “Cargo Cult: The New Physics
Good, Bad and Bogus.
S-319. from T. Atkin regarding quantum theories of gravity
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:57:31 -0800 (PST)
From: "T. Akin." <wram_tech@yahoo.com> | This is Spam | Add to Address Book
Subject: Fwd: gravity through the deBroglie matter wave frequency
To: stealthskaters@yahoo.com
> Forwarded Message [ Save to my Yahoo! Briefcase | Download File ]
> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 21:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "T. Akin." <wram_tech@yahoo.com>
> Subject: gravity through the deBroglie matter wave frequency
> To: wram_tech@yahoo.com
>
> http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/images/sourceof.txt
> Forwarded Message [ Save to my Yahoo! Briefcase | Download File ]
> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 21:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "T. Akin." <wram_tech@yahoo.com>
525
> Subject: Superconductivity can alter the 'debroglie matter wave'
> To: wram_tech@yahoo.com
>
> http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapterc.html
>
> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 21:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "T. Akin." <wram_tech@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Anamation of 'deBroglie matter wave'
> To: wram_tech@yahoo.com
>
> http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/Waves.html
>
> Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 11:04:26 -0800 (PST)
> From: "T. Akin." <wram_tech@yahoo.com> | This is Spam | Add to Address Book
> Subject: Some understanding of the ' deBroglie matter wave '
> To: stealthskaters@yahoo.com
>
> http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapter7.html
S-320. from John Schnurer (JNL Labs) regarding the Aspden Effect
From : John Schnurer <herman@antioch-college.edu>
To : stealthskaters <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: [jlnlabs] The Aspen Effect has been tested, and it is for real! (fwd)
Date : Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:32:44 -0500 (EST)
Dear StealthSkater,
Below is an example of possible science, posted in good faith, I am sure, and my general rejoinder.
Please let me know what you think. And, for what it is worth, I have corresponded with Sarfatti off-andon for years. To my thinking, he espouses what I call "Word Salad".
Let me know if this is of interest to you. If not I will send you no more educationals.
JH
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------> Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:44:05 -0500 (EST)
> From: John Schnurer <herman@antioch-college.edu>
> To: sveinutne <utne@msoft.no>
> Cc: jlnlabs@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [jlnlabs] The Aspen Effect has been tested, and it is for real!
>
> Dear SV.,
>
526
> With regard to the Aspden Effect and his text, which is referenced by way of the URL you
supplied, there is no specific detail of the motor and its construction and the power supply
and its construction and the voltage, current and-or waveform and-or power used during the
tests.
>
> Can you please let us know the specific details of:
>
> (A) Motor:
>
> The motor and its construction
>
> (B) Power Supply:
>
> The power supply and its construction
>
> (C) Power Use:
>
> The power, voltage, current and-or waveform and-or power usage and usage compared
with RPM
>
> These are key and non trivial aspects of the experiment. To simply say or write as Aspden
has:
>
>
"......with the motor drawing a little extra input power ....."
>
"......the bearing housings feel cool ......"
>
"......Two machines of different rotor size and composition ..."
>
"......would run for two or three minutes drawing its necessary drive power from the
supply ......."
>
>
This does not give enough information to make solid conclusion.
>
> Further, this statement below indicates Aspden may not have acquired a solid
understanding of the specific aspect of the background of "Quantum Sciences" he is citing.
>
> ".......That quantum jitter, by the way, is the so-called 'Zitterbewegung' that underlies
Heisenberg's Principle of Uncertainty in quantum theory, by which neither position nor
momentum are certain, but multiply the two together and you get a definite quantum of
angular momentum h/2&pi;, where h is Planck's constant of action. ......"
>
> I find great enjoyment in the Study of The History and Ethics of Science and Technology.
>
> Below you will find some of the History and Ethics of Science and Technology of one
aspect of the Quantum Sciences.
>
>The expression: "Heisenberg's Principle of Uncertainty" comes from the popular press and
is Not what Heisenberg even called his Theory. Heisenberg used the word "Principle" in the
text of his theory. The Theory is still a theory. It is not at present a theory which has valid
527
basis and has been largely kept "alive" by press. The word Heisenberg used, by the way, is
Indeterminacy. Werner Heisenberg Principle of Indeterminacy.
>
> This theory is based on a THOUGHT EXPERIMENT and the experiment is a reflection on
Heisenberg's knowledge of the level of experimental physics at that time and the only way
He could think of to perform a measure that would support his theory.
>
> He demonstrated this by simple thought experiments of the following type: if we try to
locate the exact position of an electron we must use rays with very short wavelengths such as
gamma rays. But by so illuminating it the electron's momentum will be changed by its
interaction with the energetic gamma rays. Alternatively a lower-energy wave can be used
that will not disturb the momentum of the electron so much but, as lower energy implies
longer wavelength, such radiation will lack the precision to provide the exact location of the
electron.
>
> Basically this is a Mathematical Theory, based on a Thought Experiment, based on the
background knowledge of a Mathematician's understanding of experimental physics as He
understood it in 1927 and before. Not a law of physics.
>
> I am not, per se, agreeing or disagreeing with Aspden. I am reserving any such until there
is better information. I will say, however, I am not in love with his text that is intended to
describe the reason his "effect" obtains.
>
> I am excited about the possibility there is verification of an effect. But there is not enough
information in the Aspden account and I hope the new investigators can supply such.
>
> JH
>
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, sveinutne wrote:
>
>> LECTURE NO. 30
>> The Aspden Effect
>> Copyright © Harold Aspden, 2002
>> http://www.energyscience.co.uk/le/Le30/le30.html
>>
>> I wonder if Harold Aspden has written more about this effect, as he has promised
to do? I have some friends in Norway that tested the Aspen Effect, and they can
confirm it is for real. They could stop the rotor for a minute and start it again and use
only 1/3 the energy as they did the first time. They repeated this more then 20 times,
with different stop times, and got a nice curve dependent on how quickly they
stopped the wheel, how long it rested and how quickly they started it again.
>>
>> They will write a report on this as soon as they get time for it. I have also been
told that a person from Japan did a lot of testing on the Aspden effect and tested
different material. One interesting discovery was that more dens material seams to
lose their virtual inertia more slowly the lighter masses. The differences was not
great, only 1% or 2 %. But a wheel that was perfectly balanced made of copper from
528
0 to 180 degrees of the wheel and aluminum the rest was spinning perfect in the start,
but started to vibrate when is was loosing its virtual inertia uneven.
>>
>> If some of you have any links to the Japanese report or to any other report on the
Aspen effect, I would like to know about it.
>>
>> Regards
>> Svein
>
> Messages archives at :
>
> http://www.egroups.com/group/jlnlabs/
>
> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to jlnlabs-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
> JLN Labs web site at: http://go.to/jlnlabs
>
S-321. from Bob King regarding the "Timeline of Secret Government Projects" essay at the
Cassiopaea site
From : bob king <bobking@xtra.co.nz>
Reply-To : bob king <bobking@xtra.co.nz>
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: "Timeline of Secret (US) Government Projects"
Date : Tue, 5 Nov 2002 11:15:04 +1300
Hi ya Stealth,
> Tell me what you think of http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/timeline.htm .
I think the writer has some clues as to what has been going on but doesn't know half the whole story
(I don't either). Some of what he has written is to me not completely correct. But whatever it does give
some idea of what has been going on in secret over the years. I would dispute the article on the Van
Allen belts amongst others. There is much more left unsaid or unknown to the writer than what he has
written.
I noted on the news the other day that NASA is trying to prove that they actually landed men on the
Moon!! I wonder why they have to prove something which they have stated as factual unless there are
many grave doubts about the issue.
> It seems to emphasize the great deal of mind-tampering research that was done by
Montauk-Phoenix and other predecessors of HAARP, and in that regard parallels the writings
of
Martin
Cannon
who
was
convinced
that
much
of
UFO-type
sightings/encounters/abductions were memory-implants.
Agreed, if only we could get the whole story! We never will, not in our lifetimes anyway.
529
Regards,
Bob
S-322. from Jack Sarfatti regarding Zero-Point Geodesic Motion
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 13:32:58 -0800
From: "ISEP Theoretical Physics Group" <sarfatti@pacbell.net> | This is Spam | Add to Address Book
Subject: zero point fluctuation geodesic motion?
To: tdesiato@ucsd.edu
If you mean only in the LIF where the Levi-Civita Christoffer symmetric connection coefficients vanish,
then of course.
Change your "In an inertial reference frame
d^2x^nu/dtau^2 = 0"
which I interpreted globally as in the HRP model to "In a LOCAL inertial reference frame,
d^2x^nu/dtau^2 = 0"
and that is consistent with GR EEP.
However, you only do mean value here. You also have to compute the root mean square fluctuation
<E^2>^1/2 in your nuucsd.edu wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> Please don't confuse what I wrote with Dr. Haisch's model. I am not speakingabout SED or their
findings. I agree they do not include anything to breakthe symmetry of the vacuum state.
>
> I am talking about QED and the zero-point EM field from P. W. Milonni's book on the Quantum
Vacuum. By definition and derivation of the ZPF in QED we get that the expectation values of the
field <E> and <B> are zero. (Ch. 2)
>
One has to make sure that is still the case in a curved spacetime in an LNIF frame. For example,
Unruh effect in which a uniformly accelerating observer in global flat spacetime sees a thermal photon
field, then use EEP on that. <E> = 0 still for thermal fields of course. But we are really interested in
<E^2> effects.
My point about HRP is that they do not show any connection of <E^2zpf> to any general relativity
quantity like guv, therefore in no sense can they claim origin of inertia from EM ZPE in any sense
consistent with GR as in Wheeler & Ciufolini's "Gravitation and Inertia" for example.
In contrast, I have such a connection
http://stardrive.org/Jack/Lambda1.pdf
530
for
the
e+-e-
zero
point
PV
in
>
>Take the relativistic Lagrangian of a "free" uncharged particle, theequation of motion is, (B.
Felsager, Pgs. 304, 305)
>
>d^2x^nu/dtau^2 = -L^nu_ab*(dx^a/dtau)(dx^b/dtau) where L^nu_ab is the Chrstoffel field.
>
>In an inertial reference frame,
>
>d^2x^nu/dtau^2 = 0
>
>Surely you recognize this from MTW as well.
>
>Likewise, the equation of motion for the acceleration on a charged particledue to the Lorentz
force, in inertial coordinates is, (B. Felsager, pgs.304, 305)
>
>d^2x^nu/dtau^2 = (q/m)*F^nu_a*(dx^a/dtau)
>
The more interesting equation in the LIF is
d^2x^[<nu^2> - <nu>^2]^1/2/dtau^2 = (q/m)*<F^nu_a*^2>^1/2(dx^a/dtau) =/= 0 ?????
This is not "geodesic".
>
> So in a zero-point field F^nu_a = 0, and the equations are identical. Thisholds true in any
gravitational field which can be approximated as a local inertial reference frame.
>
Yes, OK for mean value only (Eherenfest's theorem).
>
> d^2x^nu/dtau^2 = 0
>
> It doesn't matter whose model you use, it is by definition the same thing. How you go about
breaking the symmetry is a different issue entirely. In our QED model we do it by altering the
spectral energy density of the vacuum state using a superposition of fields. If you want to modify
your virtual off mass-shell positronium or BEC, what else would you use to do it? It's the only
tool we have short of trapping a star in a Dyson Sphere. :0)
>
You lost me. What do you mean "altering the spectral energy density of the vacuum" on what basis?
My virtual off mass-shell positronium BEC (no "or") has a coherent phase variation, or modulation, that
IS Einstein's guv for a given LNIF!
Note that the phase variation is eliminated in an LIF via a gauge transformation that is equivalent to a
local tetrad ransformation.
I mean in an LNIF at P
guv = nuv + (Lp^2/2)[argPsi,u,v + argPsi,v,u]
531
where nuv = Minkowski space metric.
The local tetrad map from LNIF(P) to LIF(P) is a phase (or local gauge transformation)
ArgPsi(P) -> ArgPsi(P)' = ArgPsi(P) + Chi(P)
such that argPsi,u,v(P)' + argPsi,v,u(P)' = 0
This is the formalization of EEP as a local gauge transformation inside the paradigm of my new theory
of Einstein's geometrodynamics as an emergent "More is different" (Sakharov-Anderson) collective
phenonmenon out of the Psi coherence of the PV Dirac e+-e- zero point vacuum fluctuations.
This is a very elegant beautiful result that I am able to derive Einstein's Equivalence Principle (EEP) in
so simple a fashion as a local gauge transformation on the coherence of the vacuum polarization e+-ezero point fluctuations.
I don't need no damn random transverse polarized electromagnetic zero point fluctuations to derive
gravity and inertia as Einstein meant it! The latter is simply noise not signal!
>
>
> FYI: My reference is Geometry, Particles, and Fields by Bjorn Felsager, Springer-verlag, NY,
1998.
>
> It's a very well written book!
>
I have that book.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 10:40 AM, ...ucsd.edu wrote:
>
>> Hi Jack,
>>
>> A while back you wrote...
>>>
>>> Jack: Time-like geodesic motion is for a test particle in free float without any electrical
force. Any electromagnetic force on a charged test particle pulls that particle off a time-like
geodesic (in 4-dim spacetime) on to a time-like non-geodesic.
>>>
>>> An electric charge in an EM field is on a time-like non-geodesic. (Forget KaluzaKlein 5-dim spacetime for now).
>>>
>> I realized the error. However, I'm not sure you realize that the geodesic equation of motion
for a particle in a gravitational field is "identical" to the equation for the average motion of a
charged particle in the zero-point electromagnetic field (ZPF) F_ab = 0.
>>
>>d^2x^mu/dtau^2 = 0
>>
532
>> Therefore, any average drift caused by Zitterbewegung motion is in fact equal to geodesic
motion, because by definition the ZPF is 0 in QED. They are observationally indistinguishable.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>
> No, what you say is obviously wrong! It makes no sense at all. Here is why.
>
> The equation for motion of a test charge in the Haisch theory, for example assumes globally flat
spacetime with random EM fields of the SED theory of e.g. Trevor Marshall. There is no source
mass M to bend space-time hence no non-trivial curved geodesic structure other than the trivial
globally flat one.
>
> Your above equation uses only ordinary derivatives not covariant derivatives whose connection
coefficients have the curvature information.
>
> Haisch et-al have completely failed IMO to show any connection between EM ZPE of SED and
Einstein's connection field. The latter depends on sources (i.e. on Tuv for spin 1 and spin 1/2
fields). They fail to understand that their implicit tuv(ZPE spin 1) is a /\ guv term in Einstein's
field equation and it is 122 powers of 10 too big and once more it anti-gravitates. Their whole
program is wrong. Seriously wrong.
S-323. from Wayne Mitchell regarding "Project Ghost"
From : "Wayne Mitchell" <wmkm@mindspring.com>
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: Project "Ghost"
Date : Mon, 24 Jun 2002 06:39:25 -0700
>> From: "Wayne Mitchell"
>> To: kram@stealthskater.com
>> Subject: Q:
>> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 21:47:48 -0700
>>
>> Stealthskater,
>> Have you ever heard of "Project Ghost" and do you know what it is?
>>
>> --Wayne
----- Original Message ----> From: Stealth Skater
> To: wmkm@mindspring.com
> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:34 AM
> Subject: Project "Ghost"
>
> Sorry, Wayne, but I never heard of it. What topic/subject is it connected with (i.e., UFOs,
Montauk/P-X, remote-viewing, military technology)? With that information I can quiz some
sources ...
533
Military. Especially worked on in the 80s and was considered to be used in the Gulf War.
S-324. from John Schnurer regarding the Aspen Effect
From : John Schnurer <herman@antioch-college.edu>
To : stealthskaters <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: [jlnlabs] The Aspen Effect has been tested, and it is for real! (fwd)
Date : Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:32:44 -0500 (EST)
Dear StealthSkater,
Below is an example of possible science -- posted in good faith I am sure -- and my general
rejoinder.
Please let me know what you think. And, for what it is worth, I have corresponded with Sarfatti offand-on for years. To my thinking, he espouses what I call "Word Salad".
Let me know if this is of interest to you. If not, I will send you no more educationals.
JH
---------- Forwarded message ---------> Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:44:05 -0500 (EST)
> From: John Schnurer <herman@antioch-college.edu>
> To: sveinutne <utne@msoft.no>
> CC: jlnlabs@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [jlnlabs] The Aspen Effect has been tested, and it is for real!
>
>Dear SV.,
>
> With regard to the Aspden Effect and his text, which is referenced by way of the URL you
supplied, there is no specific detail of the motor and its construction and the power supply and its
construction and the voltage, current and-or waveform and-or power used during the tests.
>
> Can you please let us know the specific details of:
>
> (A)
Motor:
>
> The motor and its construction
>
> (B)
Power Supply:
>
> The power supply and its construction
>
> (C)
Power Use:
>
> The power, voltage, current and-or waveform and-or power useage and useage compared with
RPM
534
>
>
> These are key and non trivial aspects of the experiment. To simply say or write as Aspden has:
>
> "......with the motor drawing a little extra input power ....."
> "......the bearing housings feel cool ......"
> "......Two machines of different rotor size and composition ..."
> "......would run for two or three minutes drawing its necessary drive power from the supply
......."
>
> This does not give enough information to make solid conclusion.
>
> Further, this statement below indicates Aspden may not have acquired a solid understanding of
the specific aspect of the background of "Quantum Sciences" he is citing.
>
> ".......That quantum jitter, by the way, is the so-called 'Zitterbewegung' that underlies
Heisenberg's Principle of Uncertainty in quantum theory, by which neither position nor
momentum are certain, but multiply the two together and you get a definite quantum of angular
momentum h/2&pi;, where h is Planck's constant of action. ......"
>
> I find great enjoyment in the Study of The History and Ethics of Science and Technology.
>
> Below you will find some of the History and Ethics of Science and Technology of one aspect of
the Quantum Sciences.
>
> The expression: "Heisenberg's Principle of Uncertainty" comes from the popular press and is not
what Heisenberg even called his Theory. Heisenberg used the word "Principle" in the text of his
theory. The Theory is still a theory. It is not at present a theory which has valid basis and has
been largely kept "alive" by press. The word Heisenberg used, by the way, is Indeterminacy.
Werner Heisenberg Principle of Indeterminacy.
>
> This theory is based on a THOUGHT EXPERIMENT and the experiment is a reflection on
Heisenberg's knowledge of the level of experimental physics at that time and the only way He
could think of to perform a measure that would support his theory.
>
> He demonstrated this by simple thought experiments of the following type: if we try to locate
the exact position of an electron we must use rays with very short wavelengths such as gamma
rays. But by so illuminating it the electron's momentum will be changed by its interaction with the
energetic gamma rays. Alternatively a lower-energy wave can be used that will not disturb the
momentum of the electron so much but, as lower energy implies longer wavelength, such
radiation will lack the precision to provide the exact location of the electron.
>
> Basically this is a Mathematical Theory, based on a Thought Experiment, based on the
background knowledge of a Mathematician's understanding of experimental physics as He
understood it in 1927 and before. Not a law of physics.
>
> I am not, per se, agreeing or disagreeing with Aspden. I am reserving any such until there is
better information. I will say, however, I am not in love with his text that is intended to describe
the reason his "effect" obtains.
>
535
> I am excited about the possibility there is verification of an effect. But there is not enough
information in the Aspden account and I hope the new investigators can supply such.
>
> JH
>
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, sveinutne wrote:
>>
>> LECTURE NO. 30
>> The Aspden Effect
>> Copyright © Harold Aspden, 2002
>> http://www.energyscience.co.uk/le/Le30/le30.html
>>
>> I wonder if Harold Aspden has written more about this effect, as he has promised to do? I
have some friends in Norway that tested the Aspen Effect, and they can confirm it is for real.
They could stop the rotor for a minute and start it again and use only 1/3 the energy as they did
the first time. They repeated this more then 20 times, with different stop times, and got a nice
curve dependent on how quickly they stopped the wheel, how long it rested and how quickly
they started it again. They will write a report on this as soon as they get time for it. I have also
been told that a person from Japan did a lot of testing on the Aspden effect and tested different
material. One interesting discovery was that more dens material seams to lose their virtual
inertia more slowly the lighter masses. The differences was not great, only 1% or 2 %. But a
wheel that was perfectly balanced made of copper from 0 to 180 degrees of the wheel and
aluminum the rest was spinning perfect in the start, but started to vibrate when is was loosing
its virtual inertia uneven.
>>
>> If some of you have any links to the Japanese report or to any other report on the Aspen
effect, I would like to know about it.
>
>> Regards
>> Svein
S-325. from Mark Solis regarding "speeds" of light
From : Mark Solis <masolis_52@yahoo.com>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com, KRAM@stealthskaters.com
Subject : "Speeds Of Light"
Date : Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:36:53 -0800 (PST)
Dear Sir(s),
Here's a little something I did in college around 20-or-so years ago, just sort of "out of the blue":
Given: A rank n
... v in R(n)
... h in R(1)
... s in R(1)
...
Av = hv
536
...
<Av,v> = <hv,v>
...
s = h<v,v>
...
s = hv^2
... Let E = s
...
m=h
...
c=v
Equations of the same form have the same properties and can be derived identically.
Hence: (1) Energy is a "real" quantity.
...
(2) Mass is an "eigenvalue."
...
(3) Light velocity is an "eigenvector."
...
(4) dim (Eigenspace) of "c" is n.
Conclusion: Light velocity has NUMEROUS values between which it can jump under criteria unknown
at this time.
See work published in "Gallilean Electrodynamics" on the variability of "c" with time. The above work
may well represent what happens as "c" drops ever lower, oscillating as it goes.
Today's Trick Question: What is happening at the "Schwarzchild Radius" of black holes? Are black
holes OSCILLATING??? (First posed publicly at ISDC '94 in Toronto, Ontario, as part of a paper
presented, "Lightspeed: Fact Or Fallacy?" Copies are available from Archives International of Canada,
Ltd., Toronto, Ontario.
Yours truly,
Mark A. Solis
masolis_52@yahoo.com
Beyond The Cutting Edge (Page being rebuilt):
http://www.geocities.com/your_neighbor_2000/ <Click> on "Superluminal Physics"
Superluminal Particles (Same As Above):
http://www.geocities.com/your_neighbor_2000/Super_1.html
The StarDrive Technology Page of Mark A. Solis:
http://www.geocities.com/your_neighbor_2000/StarDrive.html
<Click> on "RAMBO Drive"
Mars Aerial Surveyor:
http://www.geocities.com/your_neighbor_2000/MAS_Mars.html
Mark A. Solis On Yahoo!: http://www.geocities.com/masolis_52/
537
Songs By Mark A. Solis
http://www.geocities.com/masolis_52/z_songs.html
-ORhttp://www.geocities.com/ms3/masolis_52/
John Hutchison's Web Page:
http://www.geocities.com/john_hutchison_2000/main.html
S-326. from Andrew Potter forwarding physics discussion between Larry Maurer & Edward
Halerewicz
From : Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: Re: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
Date : Fri, 13 Dec 2002 01:51:58 -0500
>
> From: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer1101@hotmail.com>
> To: potterae@email.uc.edu
> CC: y-minami@pq.jp.nec.com
> Subject: Fwd: Re: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 22:58:10 +0000
>,X-OriginalArrivalTime:
12
Dec
2002
22:58:10.0450
(UTC)
FILETIME=[F1419720:01C2A231]
>
> Andrew:
>
> Thanks for the information on the quantum effects done with a standard high school lab proving
4X speed of light! here is some interesting info concerning a discussion of the ZPE with Ed and
Yoshinari below:
>
>
>
> Larry
>
>> From: "Edward Halerewicz, Jr." <hal_warp@hotmail.com>
>> To: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer1101@hotmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
>> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:58:17 -0600
>>
>> Larry,
>>
>> Yes, I received the CC. As for ZPE, it can be related to electromagnetic energy but it is
not the same. The electromagnetic Zero Point Force ("Zero Point" comes from the fact that
there is still "quantum energy" even if there is zero classical electromagnetic energy) exist as
non-thermal energy associated with the vacuum of space as required by Quantum Field
Theory (QFT).
538
As I understand, you have had some contact with Hal Puthoff. If you want an expert opinion
on it, I suggest that you ask him. As for a box perspective, it would depend on the box. I
doubt any box is capable of blocking all frequencies and is a reasonable assumption from the
laws of Thermodynamics. I would assume that this refers to the Casimir Effect where 2
metallic plates can block certain frequencies and "press" the plates together. There is a certain
requirement for distance and alignment of the plates. There is no closed box, so the prior logic
doesn't hold up. But that can be seen as blocking certain frequencies at that presses the plates
together (as an attachment, I included a gif from NASA's Warp Drive When site which
describes this).
From the Yoshinari question, I suspect this question arises from assuming Classical laws and
not taking into account QFT. A simpler analogy is that virtual particles create the
electromagnetic fields associated with ZPE. It is not the motion of electrons! The Casimir
Force is actually a variation of the Van Der Waals Force. Which again indicates a variance
from the Classical theory, so the two aren't the same. And it is probably of equal weight as
you suggest that particles can "tunnel" from this ZPE as it is a dispersion of wave functions
which creates virtual particles do to QFT which acts to creates the ZPE.
>
> Edward
>
>
> ----- Original Message ---->> From: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer1101@hotmail.com>
>> To: <hal_warp@hotmail.com>
539
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 7:36 PM
>> Subject: Re: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
>>
>> Hi Ed:
>>
>> Thanks for replying and for your understanding and patience. Did you get the email
reply I CC'd you to Yoshinari? We finally cashed your check. These banks today are sure
getting to be fickle ever since the 9/11 incident. I am pretty excited about Yoshinari
translating our book into Japanese and working with his publisher friend to market our
book in Japan. I know a lot of rock&roll bands, for instance, that weren't popular in the
U.S. until they were a big hit in Japan. Yoshinari says that there hasn't been any technical
books produced and/or offered on the book market lately which gives us a chance to spark
some interest.
>>
>> Is ZPE the same as electromagnetic wave or not? Some professor states that if electromagnetic field does not exist inside the box, then the zero point fluctuation also does not
exist inside the box. I think that the zero point fluctuation is not related to electromagnetic
field (or wave). Is it my misunderstanding?
>>
>> What is your opinion on Yoshinari's question, Ed? I gave him my two cents worth
stating that I believe the EM waves interact with the ZPE as in our case with the GVP for
E X M as an electron "borrows" energy from the ZPE in order to tunnel. In a sense, I
perceive the ZPE as a sea of tremendous energy that exists on Planckian levels that if the
proper EM wavepacket is produced can interact like a "lock and key" that can tap into the
energy to obtain the necessary "extra" energy required for a particle to tunnel.
>>
>> I have been working on a scale model of the larger, main body "cigar-shaped" vehicle
(12 ft. dia. x 178 ft. long at 1:20 scale). The metallic spray paint I am using is impressive
as it is bright and shiny metallic just like the Niobium-Tin we will be using. That is one
important aspect of our design is that bright shiny metals "perfectly reflect 4-D spacetime
upon itself like an optical mirror. The biexcitonic charged laser plasma is in the full color
spectrum which is also important for any chemo-electro energy reactions (like
photosynthesis) to take place. That along with the all important "capped-cone" fiber
bundle topology with 1/3-fractional charged vehicle produces this required integrity
pattern of the overall EM wavepacket of our ship to interact with the ZPE to perform
MQT, etc.
>>
>> Can't wait to create the film with the model to illustrate various technical aspects of our
design. You have to admit that not many others have a model of their proposed spaceship
design like we have. We will be adding .avi film clips of the model to add to our CD
ROM disc that you will receive in the mail soon. I might send you your disc first as this
book business sure is a real hair puller since we have to go from MS-Word to Adobe pdf
and re-size it all for the book. In order to get our price, we have to print 100 books.
Getting the money together looks good. But if not, we will just do 5-or-so at a time to get
started. We can burn you your disc right away and send it to you while we are screwing
around with resizing, final hard copy editing etc.
You are going to be impressed, Ed, with the book. It certainly is worth the wait, I
guarantee it! It is chock full of facts and contains absolutely nothing about any UFO
material, jargon, etc. -- [just] pure facts that have been mostly proven by real devices.
>>
540
>> Regards,
>>
>> Larry
>>
>>> From: "Edward Halerewicz, Jr." <hal_warp@hotmail.com>
>>> To: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer1101@hotmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
>>> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:32:59 -0600
>>>
>>> Well, I don't know what to say bout the check. But at least it go through
eventually. I look forward to seeing the book as I am curious to how you solve certain
problems. As for my message in the Alcuiberre Warp Drive club, the model I've been
working on might involve some of the same equations you may be working with. But
it's not the same idea. For example, the laser I mentioned is just to cool the atoms. It's
not a projected exciton beam as your design is.
>>> Basically I was just trying to collapse a region in front of a BEC and expand a
region behind it so it would look more like Alcuiberre's Warp Drive. So in essence, I
was just trying to create a model of a warp drive, similar to the superluminal phonon
paper I made mention of before. My problems were that I don't know if I can create a
stable expanded region, so an acoustic analog is likely the best simulation I can create
if possible.
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ---->>>> From: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer1101@hotmail.com>
>>>> To: <hal_warp@hotmail.com>
>>>> Cc: <murdic1@bellsouth.net>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 1:27 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello Ed:
>>>>
>>>> Finally was successful in cashing check. I don't know what to think about
these banks anymore. Ever since the 9/11 incident, they have been so conservative,
it is disgusting. Anyway, we have to deal with it.
>>>>
>>>> I only have to say is that what we have to offer is well worth the extra time
and effort we have to take to make the book right. You know as well as I do, Ed, if
we have any egg on our face at all (meaning any glitches or mistakes, however
minor they may be) as it will only hurt us and we will not achieve our goals of
ushering into society such a powerful flight technology.
>>>>
>>>> I appreciate your patience, Ed. If you only knew what ordeal we have been
through just to export our book from Word into Adobe pdf in order to publish. At
any rate, Ed, I am proud to sa, (through blood sweat and tears) vini vidi vicci, we
are ready to pass the baton to you with the book and CD ROM with Miller standing
541
ever so patiently to discuss quantum physics with any qualified Ph.D-level physicist
any minute detail of our design.
>>>>
>>>> I am about 50% finished with my scale model of the larger stretched, cigarshaped version of our design. I am overjoyed that my mold of the stern section
came out as I had planned (along with the metallic paint that represents the bright
shiny Niobium metal that perfectly reflects 4-D spacetime upon itself!). I can't wait
until we film the model with dubbing real people and background in a tech review
of the ship.
>>>>
>>>> If the creek don't rise and the earth still stands, Ed, you should receive your
book in the next few days.
>>>>
>>>> Larry
>>>>
>>>>> From: "Edward Halerewicz, Jr." <hal_warp@hotmail.com>
>>>>> To: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer1101@hotmail.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
>>>>> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 15:49:44 -0600
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for keeping me updated on your progress.
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ---->>>>>> From: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer1101@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>To: <hal_warp@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 8:14 PM
>>>>>>Subject: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just wanted to let you know that we are working as hard as we can
to get you your book and disc. I am trying to get a better price from our
publisher and try to get them to work with us on the larger picture. I don't
mind not making a profit from getting you your copy. But the price break
we can work with is at 100 copies. We applied for an account with them to
do so whereby we will be billed next month for the 100 copies. If we are
turned down, then so be it. I will send you your book and then we will have
to gather 20-or-so book buyers at a time. I don't want to sell our book at a
higher price to make it worth our efforts just to lower the price back down
to the same price we quoted as. Hopefully they will work with us so we
can maintain the price quote we want to sell the book for so everyone gets
treated fairly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We appreciate your patience, Ed, and you will get your book and
disc soon. Our associate in Japan -- Yoshinari Minami -- has a close friend
that is owner of one of the largest book publisher/distributors in Japan and
he says that he is excited about marketing our book in Japan. I mentioned
this to our publisher, so hopefully it will help things out a little with our
account application. We have had nothing but praise for our promo-book
and we are very confident that we will be successful at selling our books all
542
over the World. You know it will take a little effort on the publisher and
marketing people to get started fresh at selling our books.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway, I just wanted to drop you a line to update you on our
progress. I am looking forward to having you provide a link to our book!
We are also getting our quantum computer book "HOLO-1" up and running
for printing and marketing next (hopefully before Christmas)!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Talk to you soon....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Larry Maurer
>>>>>> UNITEL, Inc.
S-327.
from Andrew Potter forwarding correspondence from Larry Maurer on writing
UNITEL's HOLO-1 and "Flying Colors" books
From : Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: Re: How bout them Bearcats ;)
Date : Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:59:49 -0500
>> From: Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
>> To: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer1101@hotmail.com>
>> Subject: How bout them Bearcats ;)
>> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:01:32 -0500
>>
>> Larry,
>>
>> Just to be sure, the PDF does work that I uploaded? It wasn't corrupted or anything?
If so, are you going to use this for web publishing and/or for your book? Let me know
if you need any more help.
>>
>>-Andrew >
> Hi Andrew:
>
> I have been thinking about asking our mutual pal Mr. McWilliams if he would like to take up this
new edition and print up 50-or-so if we offered to pay him $10 per book. I mean the covers are
pretty much the same. But we need to have them "perfect bound" rather than the plastic spiral and
all.
>
> What do you think? Forgive-and-forget and move on is what I am thinking. I believe that we are
all wanting the same ends to our means. And that is to get the damn ship built so we can get off this
rock and seek the unknown and explore, etc. I was never one to have carried a grudge or whatever if
you know what I mean. I know Mark really tried to do his best and he did a good job. It's just a
shame that we can't see eye-to-eye and so forth.... Oh well, touchy feely things are not the ideal
these days of desperation and do-or-die thanks to our current state of the economy.
>
543
> Next on the agenda is to get the HOLO-1 book up-and-running to market along with the aero
propulsion book. It's a crying shame that we have such a well thought-out design and ready to build
QC where all we get is the fact that we are "competition". I just received several contacts with Sun
Microsystems, EMC, Dell Computers, Fujitsu and more to try to get them to buy our product or
whatever, to build and test the damn prototype at UIC with Dr. Ted Williams (Nobel Laureate for
Christ sake!). I mean what is wrong with this picture? For a measly $5 mil, you would think that
one of these orgs would spring for an obvious killer ROI in the $billion range!
>
> I couldn't believe it when my family rep (my Aunt Merlyn's husband's brother-in-law) Jim
Richeson called me and said he talked to a company rep at Fujitsu. They asked him what the
running speed was for our QC and how fast could it print! hee hee! Sounds just like the big-shot
guffawer Tech rep at IBM I talked to a while back. They don't even have an inkling of an idea of
what we have to offer. They are obviously living in a never-neverland dream world where they
think they know it all and that no one could ever outdo any of their products. Nor do they have even
a hint of what the Israeli's did with their QC when they cracked the Bletchly Park code in 12
milliseconds (which has been officially "quelled" by our Federal government because the news of
such a device would "cause panic and upset the populace").
>
> Well here we sit, Andrew, selling yet another book. Only this time it's quantum computers and our
much thought-over and regaled "HOLO-1". Should be a hit with the college crowd. Hopefully we
can sell enough books to build and test our QC. We shall see.
>
> I have started work again on the Flying Colors book. Should go along quite nicely with the other
books. Only we will present the story behind it all which basically entails our sightings which were
reported along with several other police reports, etc. Should make "John Q. Public" a little
enlightened to the fact that we have a real full-blown starship on our hands and wake the populace
up to the fact that "Star Trek" is really happening in our lifetimes! Who knows, though. May be a
flop because no one cares because it isn't IBM or Boeing or NASA. Only time will tell. My God, I
just wish we could just build something, dammit! I don't care if it is financed by the Cali cartel.
Who cares where the money comes from? As long as we can show the naysayers that our design
works once and for all!
>
> Best,
> L.
S-328. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding dark energy and gravity waves
From : Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net>
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: reprint conversion -- the original "Zeta Reticuli Incident" article
Date : Sun, 20 Apr 2003 20:16:41 -0700
"It's not enough to be right in Physics. One must be right for the right reasons." I think Max
Tegmark wrote that.
Turner, Distinguished Professor of Physics at the University of Chicago, writes:
"Dark energy is one of the deepest and most exciting puzzles in all of Science. It is likely that a crazy
new idea is needed to explain cosmic speedup and resolve the cosmological constant problem. (That
544
does not mean that every crazy idea is a solution.) The payoff will be well worth the effort. We will
gain new insights into the nature of matter, space, and time and shed light on our cosmic destiny."
Alan Guth invented "inflation" in 1980. You need a scalar quantum field the "inflaton" on classical
curved spacetime in the FRW metric assuming isotropy and homogeneity on large scale ~ 1024 meters
min. A small piece of the unstable vacuum is blown up to our early Universe 13.7 billion years ago in
an ultrashort fraction of a second as the inflaton decays. Any initial space curvature in 3D is flattened
out.
The initial zero point vacuum micro-quantum fluctuations of the decaying inflaton are stretched out
to large scale to form the density perturbations from which ordinary matter as we know it forms. Real
on-mass shell matter forms from the decay energy of the inflaton forming the post-inflation vacuum
bubble with perhaps an infinity of Level I parallel universes in Max Tegmark's sense in May 2003
Scientific American assuming simply connected not doughnut global topology.
The COBE and newer WMAP NASA space probes measure these seeds amped up quantum zero
point fluctuations in a snapshot taken when our Universe is 380,000 years old from the Big Bang. We
cannot see further into the early universe with microwaves. We can see closer to the Big Bang than
380,000 years with neutrinos and gravity waves if there are any of the latter. We should know soon with
new space experiments LISA and LIGO coming on line if we do not have more Shuttle disasters.
The key cosmological parameter in Einstein's theory is Omega Zero -- a dimensionless pure number
equal to the coarse grained large scale average mean energy density of all "stuff" relative to a critical
density given by Einstein's classical 1915 General Theory of Relativity. No one of any importance in
Physics today takes alternative gravity theories like the one Hal Puthoff has been playing with (for
maybe 20 years now without compelling results, seriously). Only a few UFO Cargo Cult Kooks (some
with U.S. Military Intelligence backgrounds) take Hal's approach seriously. This is not to say BTW that
UFOs are not real evidence for dark energy being used by an advanced civilization not from our planet
and not from our time. The use of dark energy for space and time travel with warp drive and star gates
will be called "metric engineering" -- a term invented apparently by Hal Puthoff. So not everything he
did was in vain. :-)
A spatially flat universe means Omega Zero = 1. There seems to be a discrepancy between Michael
Turner the theorist and Saul Permutter the experimentalist on the actual numbers. I heard both speak at
APS Philadelphia in April 2003. Turner says Omega Dark Energy is ~ 2/3 (0.66). But Perlmutter and
NASA
URL
say
Omega
Dark
Energy
~
3/4
(0.73
on
NASA
URL
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm/mr_content.html). Omega Ordinary Matter is ~ 0.04. The rest is
"dark matter". See Perlmutter's detailed article in same issue p. 57 with Omega Dark Energy ~ 0.7. But
the errors are only supposed to be at most .02 at least for NASA WMAP. I suppose the Type IA
supernova errors are larger and that is why the numbers wobble so much depending on which Pundit is
talking. ;-)
Now to Turner's discussion of the theory. What he says on dark energy is essentially the same in its
starting point that is as in my 2 books Destiny Matrix and Space-Time and Beyond II at
http://www.1stbooks.com and in http://qedcorp.com/APS/ of unfinished works in progress. The basic
starting physics is in John Peacock's Cosmological Physics pp 25-26.
Energy density is the source of gravity in Newton's 17th Century theory. Einstein's 20th Century
theory adds 3x pressure to this. The ratio of pressure to energy density is called w or "dubya". The
"equation of state" of stuff relates pressure to energy density. For ordinary matter when v/c << 1 where
v is average speed of an atom in a gas, for example, w << 1 so that Einstein's pressure correction to the
545
creation of gravity is ignorable. For black body random thermal radiation, w = +1/3. Dubya or w
determines how the density of stuff changes in the expanding space of our visible Universe with cosmic
scale factor R(t) with t as a convenient (but arbitrary) measure of cosmic time.
This tech part may be skipped. I have to do it more carefully later using one of James Edgar Felten's
pedagogical papers:
Indeed, the large-scale geometry of our spatially flat universe is simply cast in Riemann's 19 th
Century language used by Einstein in 1915, still used today is, for example, in a convenient choice of
cosmic time t
ds^2 = c^2dt^2 - R(t)^2[dr^2 + r^2(dtheta^2 + sin^2theta dphi^2)]
using high school spherical polar coordinates. The initial universe is a flat "plane" (actually a 3 space
unless we invoke world holography so that it really is Euclid's plane - again only on large scale > 1024
meters!) with initial distance between 2 "galaxies" as R(t --> Big Bang) normalize so that R(now) = 1.]
The variation of density of this or that stuff scale as R(t)^-3(1 + w).
Ordinary non-relativistic matter density with w~0 then scales as common sense would suggest R(t)^3. Not so for thermal radiation density that scales as R(t)^-3(4/3) = R(t)^-4. This last result shows that
you cannot trust common sense in Physics. All good physicists have long ago lost their common sense!
Einstein alluded to "common sense" as mere superstitious childhood prejudice. Fundamentalists,
crackpots, Luddites, and illiterates generally -- whether in science or religion or politics -- find that hard
to digest. It is a good litmus test. ;-)
OK, so now let's quickly cut to the chase with ZERO POINT VACUUM ENERGY! This is, after
all, what you have all been waiting for. ;-)
The best discussion of this is in Peacock op cit p.26 who uses Heisenberg's micro-quantum
uncertainty principle plus classical "covariance" (i.e., form invariance of the LOCAL laws of physics
under any relevant physical group G of frame of reference transformations) plus Einstein's LOCAL
"principle of equivalence", i.e. it is possible to find a non-rotating time-like geodesic Local Inertial
Frame or "LIF" such that so long as the local curvature is not exploding in a space-time singularity, the
local phenomena and laws of physics are approximately "flat" like in Special Relativity.
This remark is restricted at 2 ends -- the large and the small. First, the scale of measurement must be
small compared to scale of radius curvature. This is no problem at Earth's surface where scale of radius
of curvature of the source mass of Earth is ~ 1AU ~ 1013cm. Second, we can ignore quantum gravity
quantum zero point vacuum fluctuations in the geometry of space-time.
What happens if there are torsion fields and non-metricity fields from additional hyperspace
dimensions requires additional study. Einstein's theory assumes both of the latter are zero. In any case,
covariance + local equivalence of gravity to acceleration imply that w = -1 for any renormalizable
quantum field on a classical curved space-time background of any spin (i.e. spins 0, 1/2, 1, 3/2 but I am
not sure about 2).
At this point, Turner seems to make an error of detail when he says that "the virtual pairs that fill the
vacuum have negative pressure". Peter Milonni's book on the quantum vacuum (if I remember
correctly) has spin-1 virtual photons with negative zero point pressure and spin-1/2 Dirac virtual
electron-positron pairs with positive zero point pressure since they have negative zero point energy
546
density from the Pauli exclusion principle Fermi-Dirac statistics that requires anticommutators for
fermion creation and destruction second quantized field operators. Therefore, although w = -1 for the
zero point virtual quanta inside the vacuum for all spins up to 3/2 and maybe even 2, the sign of zero
point energy density cannot be assumed positive in all cases. What happens for SU(2) weak force
bosons and SU(3) strong force boson (gluons) is not obvious. One also has to see what the weak and
strong charges do to the lepto-quarks - even to the electron with now additional weak charge.
Einstein's gravity source, in all the above cases, is still of course
energy density + 3 pressure
which for any zero point fluctuation of any quantum field is
- 2 (energy density)
This implies that the zero point fluctuations of any quantum field with positive energy density will
ANTI-GRAVITATE like the now observed "dark energy". But if it walks like a duck ... is it a duck?
There are some deep problems here.
Turner writes: "Something that is very elastic (that is negative pressure ...) has gravity that repels,
rather than attracts." At this point, I remind you that Kip Thorne showed in 1986 under prodding from
Carl Sagan that you need negative pressure "exotic matter" to keep wormholes open for fast space travel
and even for time travel to the past. A few years later, Alcubierre showed you need the same negative
pressure exotic matter to make a weightless warp drive in which stuff inside the ship does not feel noninertial "g-forces". No need for pressure suits even when that saucer makes a high speed sudden
reversal of direction for example! Observed flying saucers show (according to Bruce Cornet) a "reverse
Doppler shift" which is consistent with a dark energy based "vacuum propeller" (Roger Coolidge's
term).
The next idea is to distinguish real "on mass shell" stuff outside the vacuum from virtual "off mass
shell" stuff inside the vacuum. This is a micro-quantum distinction beyond common sense only made
thinkable by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. So what we need for both dark energy and dark matter
is the idea of virtual stuff forming the /\zpf net residual zero point field of all spins in a new kind of
"Macro-quantum vacuum" with a "condensate" that is not at all part of Turner's thinking in the Physics
Today Op Ed. It's because Turner is not thinking "vacuum condensate" here that he repeats the lament
of the current conventional wisdom of the Pundits that "Quantum vacuum energy is equivalent to
Einstein's infamous cosmological constant."
That is true. But then
"Even the best quantum 'mechanics' have failed to produce a sensible prediction for /\zpf" p. 11
Not true. Here is my counter example
/\zpf = Lp^-2[1 - Lp^3|<0|e+e-|0>|^2]
/\zpf = 0 in equilibrium as in G.E. Volovik's "The Universe in a Helium Droplet" (Oxford, 2003)
/\zpf > 0 is dark energy exotic vacuum with strong short range anti-gravity
547
/\zpf < 0 is dark matter exotic vacuum with strong short range gravity e.g. cores of charged
elementary particles like the electron.
Note that Einstein's source energy density + 3 pressure is simply, in the case of exotic vacua, ~
/\zpf.
For details see my books at
http://www.1stbooks.com and http://qedcorp.com/APS/
This leads Professor Turner to his "blunder" :-)
"Even though repulsive gravity sounds like fun, dark energy -- as far as we know -- can't be bottled up to
create an object with antigravity."
Look at the flying saucers. The Truth is Out There. I shall make it so. :-)
to be continued
S-329. from Dr. Max Tegmark regarding his Scientific American "Parallel Universes" article
Subject: Re: great easy-reading article! ... and now some "fun" reading for
From: Max Tegmark <max@hep.upenn.edu
Date: Tue, April 29, 2003 8:00 pm
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Cc: max@higgs.hep.upenn.edu
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your message and the encouraging words. I'm particularly glad to hear them, since
this is one of my first cracks at writing less technical articles.
>
What I did find -- not surprisingly -- is that the people who indeed know what is going on in
these "black" worlds never write about it on the Internet …
Indeed. In my opinion, there's a lot of prejudice in the physics community towards writing about
things seen as too philosophical. Thanks also for the link - I'll check it out when I've caught up with
my backlog.
Best wishes,
;-)
/////
(OO)
|"|
|------oooO---------Oooo------|
| Prof. Max Tegmark
|
| Dept. of Physics
|
| Univ. of Pennsylvania
|
| Philadelphia, PA 19104-6396 |
| www.hep.upenn.edu/~max/ |
548
|_____________________________|
| | Oooo.
.oooO ( )
( ) )/
\ ( (_/
\_)
S-330. from Andrew Potter regarding new photonic crystals bend light to ANY frequency
Subject: Fwd: Re: Fwd: new photonic crystals bend light to ANY frequency
From: Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu> Add to Address Book
Date: Sat, May 24, 2003 12:58 am
To: kram@stealthskater.com
>X-Originating-IP: [216.26.7.15]
>X-Originating-Email: [lmaurer1101@hotmail.com]
>From: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer1101@hotmail.com>
>To: potterae@email.uc.edu
>Subject: Re: Fwd: new photonic crystals bend light to ANY frequency !
>Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 22:35:52 +0000
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 May 2003 22:35:52.0307 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[AA94AC30:01C3217B]
>
>Yes Andrew, I just received the same article from Bob Drake yesterday. Notice the use of sound
through the crystal, etc. to produce Terhertz frequencies which would be handy for WiFi and FSO
systems with HOLO-1 as the driver. Again we would be using both RF and light as a telecom source
that wouldn't break down and is unhackable with quantum HOLO-1 language! Look out IBM and
here comes UNITEL hardware!
>
>Larry
>>>
>>>"Alchemy with light shocks physicists"
>>>19:00 21 May 03
>>>Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition
>>>
>>>Claims of "unexpected and stunning new physical phenomena" are rare in the abstract of a
reputable scientific paper. But the latest report by photonics crystal pioneer John Joannopoulos
and his group at MIT, soon to be published in Physical Review Letters, does not disappoint.
>>>
>>>The researchers document the ultimate control over light: a way to shift the frequency of
light beams to any desired colour with near 100 percent efficiency. "The degree of control over
light really is quite shocking," comments photonics expert Eli Yablonovitch at the University of
California, Los Angeles.
>>>
>>>If the effect can be harnessed, it will revolutionise a range of fields - turning heat into light,
for example, or prized terahertz rays. Right now, the only way to shift the frequency of a light
beam involves sending an extremely intense light pulse -- with a power of many megawatts or
even gigawatts -- along next to it.
>>>
549
>>>This interacts with the first beam and alters its frequency. But the technique is expensive,
requires high-power equipment and is generally pretty inefficient. But when Joannopoulos and
his colleagues Evan Reed and Marin Soljacic investigated what happens when shock waves pass
through a device called a photonic crystal, they discovered a completely unexpected effect.
>>>
>>>Hall of Mirrors
>>>
>>>Photonic crystals -- which are made by sandwiching together layers of material that bend
light in different ways -- can be designed to reflect some frequencies while ..."
>>>
>>>... rest of article at http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m14354.html
>>>
or http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993750 .
S-331. from Andrew Potter forwarding correspondence from Larry Maurer (UNITEL) regarding
room-temperature superconductors
Subject: Room Temperature SuperConductors
From: Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
Date: Tue, May 27, 2003 9:31 pm
To: lmaurer1101@hotmail.com
Cc: kram@stealthskater.com
Larry,
I was listening to Michio Kaku on the radio last night. He said that the invention of room-temperature
superconductors alone would bring with them a technological revolution unlike any other. Have you
guys got good ideas on how room-temp superconductors work? Any more information on how you plan
to accomplish this? I read this in a previous e-mail where you wrote:
> "Anyway, as you know our system is a high-temperature superconducting system that
needs to be proven of course, but we have been collecting data from various experiments
involving working electronics devices.
>
> The Semiconducting Diode Elements or SDEs provide energy to the diamond coated
layered structure of niobium-tin-titanium that is stored within the layers and released at the
surface. The SDes do not 'deflect" EM radiation per se but the cloud of electrons at the
surface does deflect and/or screen out EM radiation.
>
> The key to our system we believe, lies in the close-hexagonal packed "honeycomb" lattice
of flux zones which naturally occur in niobium which is a natural Type II superconductor.
The production of fluxons in this honeycomb lattice structure we also propose is the key to
the physical interaction with the Josephson Junction that we will set up. I believe it was
Gerald Feinberg that stated that outer space could be considered a "potential barrier" aka
Josephson Junction. There is much information to be derived from the net concerning
fluxons, Niobium, and Josephson Junction.
>
> I have much information to send you on the subject but I have a problem with sending it as
an attachment because of the volume of information with JPGs so we are uploading it to a
web link on the internet in the next day
550
or so.
>
> The honeycomb lattice is indeed the high-temperature superconductor key as I understand
it. I found an article stating the universe was virtually a CHP lattice structure on the scale of
10 X -75 which seems to make sense however I haven't seen any further mention or proof of
it. I am pretty excited about the "whitelight" Chirp-pulsed Amplified CPA laser 3-frequency
spectral staggered mode clipping point which adds to the efficiency of CPA laser system that
truly compares to the pixel RGB lens that basically does the same effect.
I view the 720 degree rotation of the projected beam kind of like pistons firing; red, green
then blue to achieve bottom dead center and then repeat the firing order; red, green then blue
for top dead center and the completion of one full cycle at one ellipse per cycle. This not only
applies to the 3-mode spectral staggering but also is the same for a hadron string whereby we
produce higher degrees of symmetry through RF pinning mechanisms in the beam.
All in all, it's a beautiful quantum system that should produce the desired effects in the beam
for the ship to projected beam interaction in a unitary fashion that will produce the
surrounding fluxons to allow our vehicle to jump or tunnel which is a finite value as I see it.
It may not be instantaneous but the use of the quantum interaction should allow our vehicle
with payload to traverse vast distances of spacetime at velocities less than or nearly equal to
the speed-of-light but in a much shorter time."
--Andrew
S-332. from Tom Bearden regarding the Aharnov-Anandan and Berry phases
Subject: Fwd: RE: Time & Tesla ; also Dr. Jack & 'dark energy'/UFOs
From: "A.J. Craddock" <craddock@west.net>
Date: Tue, May 27, 2003 7:37 pm
To: "kram-stealthskater.com" <kram@stealthskater.com>
>-----Original Message---->From: A.J. Craddock [mailto:craddock@west.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 2:45 PM
>To: Tom Bearden
>Subject: Fwd: Time & Tesla ; also Dr. Jack & 'dark energy'/UFOs
>
>>
> >Hi Tom ->>
> > Before I get to the main subject of this e-mail, I understand that you graduated from
Georgia Tech. I got my MS in chemical engineering from West Virginia University. Back
then most of what I was doing was solving heat/mass/momentum models on the IBM
360/370. I frequently used IBM's CSMP and Lehigh University's LEANS-III software to
solve sets of differential equations (particularly those involving process-control, from
regulating temperature and product purity to air-to-air missile "pursuit curves").
>>
551
> > One of my closest friends as well as an advisor to my thesis was Larry R. Padgett, also a
Georgia Tech grad who was completing his PhD chem.eng. studies at WVU while working at
their computer center. Larry had worked at Union Carbide's South Charleston (WV) Tech
Center before getting layed-off. (I actually went to work there in 1974.) I'm guessing that
puts him at Georgia Tech in the mid-60's. Don't know if you ever ran across him.
>>
> > And I also learned about the high regard of Georgia Tech from a contract bid the DoD
gave to them in the late 70's to develop a means to thwart monopulse radar SAMs. (Since the
jamming electronics couldn't be developed to switch fast enough to the transmitter, they
developed a towed decoy which I think is still in use today. It must be used on nonmanuevering jets like bombers ... maybe it provides ECM/ECCM protection for the entire
airborne squadron much likes theAEGIS ships do for a carrier battle group.)
>>
> > Both you and Larry Maurer have taken your licks from the mainstreamers whose maththeories seem to be in vogue. Dr. "Ark" seems not able to resist a good mathematical
challenge; and Dr. Jack has been a perrenial thorn in UNITEL's side (as well as many other
people from what I gather). Actually there was one physicist who wrote me that he
considered Sarfatti to be a brilliant guy as long as he stayed within his realms of competence,
but frequently in this reviewer's opinion Jack would propose things which were absolutely
loony to the mainstream community. (But often "loony" things do become workable)
>>
> > Time will tell who is right. My guess is not any one theory will be entirely correct, but a
new theory will be built that will yield these other theories when appropriate assumptions are
made. At any rate, the latest from Dr. Jack, supposedly a paper he wrote for NOVA
(although
it
is
too
complex
for
them
to
present
on
tv)
=>
http://qedcorp.com/APS/Ukraine.doc . At his Yahoo! site, he recently said that he agreed
"qualitatively" with some remote-viewing info Puthoff had done and with the data Eric Davis
presented at the MUFON conference; but he did not agree with their theoretical explanations.
>>
> > Down in the guts of this lengthy document were things like this: "The key trick of metric
engineering is to set up a Josephson weak link between a real superconductor with local
order parameter and the vacuum order parameter . Ray Chiao from UCB has a somewhat
similar idea in his "gravity radio". The virtual off-mass-shell superconducting vacuum and
the real on-mass-shell superconductor beat together in the nonlinear term in the above BIT
FROM IT Landau-Ginzburg equation (5.8). Start from a non-exotic vacuum with zero
weight and use magnetic flux and Berry phase differences to pump up dark energy and dark
matter regions. The key Josephson weak link interference term for the induced exotic
vacuum zero point energy density is ..."
>>
> > Second is something I got off a KeelyNet post. An interesting bio of Tesla at =>
http://solair.eunet.yu/~velimir/works/teslaint.htm and a COMPLETELY different view of
TIME (5 different "types" of time) at => http://solair.eunet.yu/~velimir/
-andhttp://solair.eunet.yu/~velimir/works/exptime.htm . Some of this latter supports what Chica
Bruce said in her book about Tesla's EM fields influencing time. The math seems too
simplistic (compared to Sarfatti's, Puthoff's, Tegmark's etc.) and the concept smacks heavily
of meta-physics. But if "Time" is more biological than merely another dimension, maybe
that's explains the worldwide moratorium on atomic weapons testing. (The author is Prof. Dr
Velimir Abramovic bio => http://solair.eunet.yu/~velimir/ ).
>>
>>
552
> > As usual, I'm pretty much dumbfounded with all the theories and still waiting for
somebody to float something in the air (aren't we all!). That's something I can appreciate -who cares about the competing theories at that point! (BTW, I did archive some of
UNITEL's
stuff
from
the
old
website
at
http://www.stealthskater.com/UNITEL_background.htm along with supporting essays
from Puthoff, etc.)
>>
> >Best Wishes -> >-- Mark McWilliams
Thanks, Mark! Enjoyed your comments.
Interesting that you mentioned the Berry phase (a further generalization of the Aharonov-Bohm
effect). The Berry phase is even further generalized by the later Aharonov-Anandan geometric phase.
Whenever the magnetic field B is localized, then the AB effect results wherein outside the
localization zone there appears an uncurled A-potential. That is EXCESS ENERGY (from the second
curvature of spacetime there due to the change in energy density of the space). If one also extracts
energy from that now-activated external environment (outside the B-localization zone), one does indeed
obtain excess energy.
Furthermore, if a system produces that activated environment and uses means to receive extra energy
from it, rigorously that makes the resulting system a nonequilibrium steady state (NESS) dissipative
system. In the thermodynamics of such systems, they are permitted to do any of 5 magic things: (1)
self-order, (2) self-oscillate or self-rotate, (3) output more energy than the operator inputs (the excess is
freely received from the active environment), (4) power itself and its load simultaneously (all the energy
input is freely received from the external active environment, analogously to a windmill in a wind), and
(5) exhibit negative entropy. Such a system is theoretically permitted to exhibit negative entropy with
the entropy further decreasing toward negative infinity as time passes (Evans and Rondoni, "Comments
on the Entropy of Nonequilibrium Steady States," J. Stat. Phys., 109(3-4), Nov. 2002, p. 895-920.) The
authors were so taken aback by this that they posited that no real system could exhibit such entropy.
Actually every charge in the Universe already exhibits that exact form of negative entropy as we
essentially showed in our solution to the problem of the source charge and its associated fields.
Increasingly the Second Law of Thermodynamics is being falsified to greater-and-greater magnitude
levels and for greater lengths of time. The latest paper by Wang et al. [G. M. Wang, E. M. Sevick, Emil
Mittag, Debra J. Searles, and Denis J. Evans, "Experimental Demonstration of Violations of the Second
Law of Thermodynamics for Small Systems and Short Time Scales," Phys. Rev. Lett., 89(5), 29 July
2002, 050601] experimentally proves such violation from statistical fluctuation alone where the
violation (reactions run backwards) is for a cubic micron level and for up to 2 seconds. In water, e.g., a
cubic micron has some 30 billion ions and molecules. So in a situation where the "reactions run
backwards" for 30 billion ions etc., that is not a trivial thing for the chemistry! It presages a profound
impact on chemistry etc.
e.g., This justifies my earlier assumption of the formation of little "reversal zones" in electrolyte
solutions where reactions are reversed. Using that as a given, by examining the case when like charges
attract and unlike charges repel (reversal of the normal law of attraction and repulsion of charges), then
one gets a number of new nuclear reactions. The coulomb barrier (the only thing making high energy
necessary for transmutation anyway; the standard method is to use sheer brute energy and momentum to
drive the charge against a like charge so closely that each enters the strong force region of the other.
553
With the Coulomb barrier suddenly and momentarily a coulomb attractor, they attract in there
automatically! Remember, this is a negative entropy zone, proven experimentally now by Wang et al.
So e.g. take two D+ ions in such a temporary zone. Some of them (statistically) will attract together
into a quasi-nucleus of Helium-4. As we already know from hot fusion, most of the quasi-nuclei formed
will then decay by quasi-fission, just separating again. However, hot fusion also knows and proves that
some of them will be deeper into the strong force region and so will go ahead and "tighten" into a full
nucleus of He4 (which is an alpha particle). In cold fusion, using deuterated electrolyte to increase that
probability, guess what one of the standard anomalous products is? Alpha particles!
We also wrote several other reactions that would occur, and that fitted the results of the cold fusion
experiments exactly. Absolutely no one was interested in hearing about "reversal zones" etc. (which I
called "time reversal zones"). There is a mechanism that actually generates the flow of time (I
uncovered that in 1972 while at Georgia Tech and finishing my MS in nuclear engineering). The
mechanism is engineerable, and the cold fusion process is one way of engineering it to get time-reversal
locally. That is not time travel; the rest of the electrolyte outside the reversal zone goes on in forward
time. Only the entities in the "reversal zone" now proven by experimental test of the fluctuation
theorem, will be temporarily time-reversed. And that can temporarily reverse the law of attraction and
repulsion of fundamental particles.
I also explained the mysterious activation of Geiger counter readings in the China Lake electrolyte
experiments, in the absence of nuclear radiation.
So anyway, I devoted one chapter of my book Energy from the Vacuum to cold fusion.
The greatest sleeping revolution in physics, chemistry, electrodynamics, and electrodynamics is
Michael Leyton's hierarchies of symmetry [Michael Leyton, A Generative Theory of Shape, SpringerVerlag, Berlin, 2001]. I've fitted it to my proposed solution to the source charge problem, and it
generates all the symmetries and asymmetries and their levels, exactly. Leyton extended Klein
geometry (which is a subset of Leyton's object-oriented geometry) and group-theoretic methods. The
new, extended geometry and extended group theoretic methods produce the hierarchies of symmetry. In
conventional theory, a broken symmetry at one level lowers the overall symmetry, and the information
of that level of symmetry that was broken is lost. In Leyton's geometry, a broken symmetry at one level
also generates a new symmetry at a higher level, with a layer overlaying the lower level symmetries and
asymmetries so that all the information is retained. That of course is a negative entropy operation.
Leyton in fact has introduced us to the self-organizing universe.
That also solves the main problem of thermodynamics: its asymmetry. e.g., if the second law were
accurate, then once one starts with some ordered and available energy, in the subsequent interactions the
entropy can only remain the same or increase. Now that is not true; the entropy can also decrease and
there is an actual negative entropy mechanism that consumes entropy at one level and produces
available ordered energy at the next higher level. Note that energy is conserved; entropy ultimately
refers to energy that is unavailable and often disordered as well, whereas negative entropy refers to the
regaining of control and availability of the energy. Leyton has shown there are processes which do
consume positive entropy and produce negative entropy -- i.e., change the appropriate form of the
energy.
The source charge is a ubiquitous example. It consumes the positive entropy of its absorbed virtual
photon flux of the vacuum (the photons in the virtual photon gas of the vacuum, that it continually
absorbs). These photons once absorbed just become a little delta in the unitary (integrated) mass of the
charged particle, by E/(c^2) = delta m. Successive delta m's from such absorption eventually raise the
554
delta m (integrated) or "mass-energy excitation" to enough mass-energy to make an observable photon.
Whereupon the excited mass decays by emitting an observable photon (organized available energy).
That is precisely how the static source charge continuously emits real observable photons, to create
and continuously replenish its "static fields" and potentials, spreading at the speed of light from the
formation of the charge. And without any OBSERVABLE energy input. Classical Maxwell-Heaviside
EM and electrical engineering assume that the vacuum is inert (no virtual photon gas, no virtual energy
absorbed by the source charge) and the spacetime is flat (which means that even the mass of the source
charge could not exist, nor could its fields and potentials, since these assume a change in the energy
density of space.).
So the electrical engineering departments are unwittingly guilty of teaching an EM model that
assumes the complete violation of the conservation of energy law, and that also assumes conditions that
require the vanishing of both the source charge and its associated EM fields and potentials. In short, the
EE model is an oxymoron, implicitly assuming its own self-contradiction.
Once a higher group symmetry electrodynamics model is employed, however, then the virtual
photon gas and the active vacuum and the curvature of spacetime can exist. Conservation of energy is
saved, but a new means of energy conservation between the virtual state and the observable state then
exists. That requires of course a broken symmetry as discovered by Lee and Yang and proven by Wu et
al. in 1957. The broken symmetry means that "something virtual has become observable", to quote Lee.
And indeed it has. Via a negative entropy process, where the unity of the mass of the virtual particle
results in the coherent integration of absorbed virtual (subquantal) EM energy into re-emitted real
observable EM energy (real observable photons).
Now you can see why the lowly charge already is a perfect example of the startling NESS capability
shown theoretically by Evans and Rondoni.
I've been working on the thermodynamics of legitimate over-unity systems for about 6 months now,
and have about two or three more months to go. But the thermodynamics is solid.
Hope things go well with you and all your projects.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
S-333. from Dr. Velimir Abamovic regarding 'Time' in physical and biological systems
Subject: RE: Comprehension and control Time in Physical and biological systems
From: "Velimir Abramovic" <velimir@EUnet.yu>
Date: Wed, May 28, 2003 1:31 am
To: <kram@stealthskater.com>
Dear Mark,
Thank you for the interest and understanding. At the moment I am working on reconceptualization of
the fundamentals of complete Physics.
555
By the way, Tesla has developed the original method of so called 'mechanical analogies in
Electromagnetics'; that means, literally:
1. EM wavelength = hand of the classical mechanical leverage;
2. amplitude = load (or 'Force');
3. frequency = ratio of the leverage hands (works as the ratio between 'EM leverage' and outer EM
fields, just like ratio of the Archimedes concentric wheels Diameters; D 1/ D n... )
4. Tesla Coil System (Primary, Secondary, Extra-Coil, etc.) = Archimedes concentric Wheels;
5. Frequency Summa = Summa of the equal leverage hands - resonance condition ;
6. Modulation = distribution of the effect (or Force) in referent time span, given by time influence of
corresponding outer and inner EM fields that could be natural or artificial;
7. Standing waves (also Solitons) = leverage with two standing points, balancing independently of
Force or loading, in fact it holds as Force equal to loading; hand length of such leverage is zero
and that's why energy usually can not be transported by standing waves...
But Tesla invented Non-Hertzian waves. That means using induction as the way of instantaneous
transmission of standing wave form, emitting wave-length equalized to the magnitude of the
transmission distance, the effect was phantastic. Transmission time was zero and the standing wave
became pilot-wave for all the higher and lower harmonics and was able to convey energy contents;
If we look deeper, we find that "energy concept" can be analyzed to the time and space elements, so that
matter appears as 'quantized space'.
I would say that before any serious experimental work we should conceive a new theory of Time, since
Time is the basic natural Law of Continuity.
Ether undoubtedly exists: matter and space are inseparable and must have common constructive unit,
and it is -- according to my opinion -- Etheric Diameter.
I would be very grateful to you for every material or "diary notes and discussions" that lead to new
mentality in Science.
Very best wishes,
Velimir Abramovic
S-334. from Andrew Potter forwarding Edward Halerewicz, Jr.'s comments about UNITEL's
book
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:51:24 -0800
To: potterae@email.uc.edu
From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
Subject: Fwd: an interview with Larry D. Maurer
556
To: 4th.d@engineer.com
From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
Subject: an interview with Larry D. Maurer
To: starman@unitelnw.com
From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
Subject: Fwd: Re: : an interview with Larry D. Maurer
>> I wanted to read through "Quantum Electromagnetic Laser Propulsion" thoroughly in
order to give technical comments. However since I have been asked my opinion from the
ESAA group and by Andrew Potter (whom you are familiar), I'll give my present
impressions on it.
>>
>> Executive Notes:
>> While some of the ideas discussed are plausible (e.g. RF-produced excitons), a majority
appear to be based on conjecture and not solid fact.
>
> Our patent is based on mechanical stress modulation by RF waves of production excitonic gasses via
the piezoelectrec properties in our II-VI semiconducting compound lens. This curved EM emitting laser
lens is truly the first of its kind. That's for sure.
>
>> This puts you immanently onto shaky ground and anyone qualified enough to listen will
just stop there. Your house of cards will just collapse as far as the scientific community is
concerned (reputation is everything in Physics, it's better to have no theory than one with
holes as it damages your credibility and prevents you from being taken seriously). Recall
how I stated the "star flight handbook" was incorrect as the author assumed a direct
connection between EM and gravitation when there is not.
>
> We have the article where Dr. Raymond Chiao talks about the interchangeability between a charged
(spherical) object (such as our ship) with the EM energy produced from electrical emitters being
effectively interchangeable from one to the other (charge-gravity).
>
>>Well, by making similar assumptions about how a craft can tunnel through spacetime, you
are running into the same problem: assumption. You need to back up those claims with solid
proof. You would need to prove that matter doesn't have exponential energies near the
Planck length and not simply assume it (if you assume things, at least state it!). Also I took a
look at the Silver Tear PDF. Why the heck do you call the "grays" and some other bizarre
name real aliens for??? I'm sure everyone has an idea of grays (they are the modern
equivalent of the "green Martians" from H.G. Wells days) via the "X-files" and Stephen
Spielberg's "Close Encounters of the Third Kind". But please, say based on folklore or
science fiction. Real aliens??? I have a huge problem with that. The only confirmed
extraterrestrial organism was the "Mars Rock". Don't go outside established scientific fact. I
can not stress that enough. I will now comment things chronologically as they appear in the
PDF document:
>
> That document is separate material that relates to the technology we represent. Our design is patented,
for one thing. And we have manufacturers who can produce the equipment and materials to construct
our ship.
>>
>> Preface:
557
>>In the preface you refer to "man-made singularities". This would refer to black holes. None have
yet been created by man (although particle physics sometimes refers to singularities), so that's a
problem. You say the idea of QMT is being "accepted by many" but not by who; so that has the
same credibility as a late-night infomercial. "The only feasible means of interstellar is QMT" -- that
is presumptuous. Only the good Lord would know that, perhaps stating it as the candidate would be
better. You later state that "interstellar travel will never be possible without QMT". You can't show
that. The Thorne and Morris wormhole is an example of just such of an alternative. You should
word it differently. The rest of the preface is good. I find, however, the Introduction unnecessarily
comes off as a sales pitch.
>>
>> Chap 1: Paragraph One -- classically the Total Energy is mv^2/2+V and not just "energy" as in
the paragraph. This is done a lot in the book. And I can tell you that physicists hate these things.
And up front I can tell you that most wouldn't like your book because of these errors which do you
more harm than good. Rather than go point-to-point, I'll just comment on the really 'bad' and what
could be improved.
>>
>> I have problems with Yoshinari Minami's interpretation of hyperspace, but I'll come back to that.
As for 1/137 leading up to the beam interacting with the ZPF, I disagree with "according to G. 't
Hooft, this would occur as symmetry breaking at energies beginning at 174 GeV". At this range,
QED breaks down; thus 1/137 is no longer valid.
>>
> Through pinning of intermediate vector bosons in the beam, we hope to produce the monopole effects
in the projected beam structure. We can accomplish this with an FEL Fox-Li wiggler field control of the
rotating index of refraction within the beam. Through the pinning structure in the beam, we force the
structure of the beam to renormalize in higher dimensions. This has to be proven. But we are using the
latest in laser technology. The chirp pulsed amplification give us the power to work with. I say the
scientific evidence is more than supportive of our design. We just have to build real equipment of our
patented design to test for these effects.
>>
>> Chap 3: Page 57 -- "Niobium-diamond reflects spacetime". Maybe electromagnetic
energy, perhaps even vacuum energy … but not space-time. To reflect space-time, you
would have to assume it's electromagnetic in nature and that it reflects vacuum energy as you
are left to assume without proof. You seem to indicate that the GVP would displace the
parallel displacement vectors in space-time away from the ship but make no mention of how
this is accomplished. Here again, the reader is left to deal with assertion and no real physics
to deal with.
>
> I disagree as it is imperative that our system operate in the visible spectrum where there is abundant
energy. This has everything to do with Physics just as geometry-topology does.
>>
>> Chap 5: The plasma laser. It starts off as a BEC -- meaning the phonons and excitons are
governed by SU(2)XU(1) symmetry. Then through some miracle, you expect the reader to
believe it can form SU(3) symmetry. This is really an assertion; you don't say how it's done
other than a build-up of "bucking waves". There is no data that suggest BECs can make such
a transformation. So you have to let the reader know that at such-and-such temperature, you
believe QED will break down forming the plasma laser through exciton carriers.
>
558
> Again the pinning structure of the beam causes the higher dimensional interaction through the rotating,
three-phase, pulsed charged wavepackets that renormalize to SU(2)XU(1) symmetry. I will pit Michael
Miller against any qualified physicist to explain this in more detail.
>>
>>Chap 7: I assume the QMT equations have been copied from Minami's paper. The
problem is that it's assuming space-time to be a semi-classical quantum foam. This
description of spacetime is based on assuming the Planck length is where known physics
goes out the window. But there is no proof that spacetime acts in this way. Secondly, there is
superstring theory. This does more than attempt to quantize space-time and would describe
hyperspace, so the behavior of the equations within extra dimensions should be considered.
But they are not.
>
> We have not included the specific complicated math supporting our claims as it is written for the lay
person basically.
>>
>> The field equation propagating in sting theory would appear to be complex in 4dimensional spacetime. So I doubt the linearity of time within extra dimensions (without
proof anyway). Further, in string theory only bosons (energy) should propagate into extra
dimensions. The properties of fermions would be disrupted by going into extra dimensions.
The case in which they wouldn't be is in supersymmetric theories. But since only certain
classes of fermions would be destroyed and others would not, it's very problematic. Lastly, it
is assumed that once the ship has been entangled, its classical energy would be preserved to
tunnel. However, that would assume that classical energy doesn't vary near the Planck
length.
>>
>> It is also said the ship can travel anywhere in spacetime instantaneously. But this is not
explained either. There is some mention of time variance in hyperspace but no mention of
getting from the Earth-to-Andromeda in one jump. So you have this all built on a house-ofcards which can collapse it very easily. If things work as you assume, it's not a problem. But
you're simply assuming a lot of things. You really don't know what's going on and there are
other theories which state bad things would happen.
>
> It is our design to produce quantum effects with our ship-to-hole pair to produce boson effects on a
massive scale. We do need to prove ourselves and we believe we have enough evidence to take the risk
of research into the testing of prototypes. I think if you would check out my scale model of the larger
cigar-shaped vehicle design, you may start to understand the superb design it really is.
>>
>> General Comments: Well, the paper is certainly interesting. But as I mentioned, left as it
is will do you more harm than good. Assuming a QED to QCD transformation, the laser
propulsion system would to be plausible. But again there's no hard physics for it. Having the
ship entangle to become a large particle seems conceivable from what I understand. But in
the book you don't allude to how N particles of the ship can be described by a single wave
function. You need to demonstrate how the "electron cloud" could simulate a BEC. There is
also mention of the diode skin producing gravity waves through semiconductor states. To
me, this implies "gravitational control". But Chiao has proposed something similar (I
suppose you could mean this but I doubt it).
>>However, what I really take this to mean is the surface waves of the electrons on the skin;
so I would see this as a source of confusion. My biggest problem is tunneling through
"hyperspace". It's too simple applying Planckian physics to space-time. You're assuming
559
nothing else is going on in hyperspace which I find doubtful as it ignores other physics and
what may happen in extra dimensions. There are also problems in the text with labeling
equations which was distracting along with the blue highlighted links. You can tell it was
written in Word. The concept of the monopole and its affects and interaction with ZPF were
mostly accurate as well as description of fiber bundles, etc.
>>
>> Lastly, I would comment on the camouflaging space-time concept. One possible
reinterpretation for you is the following. Say the ZPF acts as the space-time metric and
entanglement of particles with the ZPF would cause frames of reference to be established. If
you then modified the entanglement of the vacuum, it could cause an entangled body to take
on new space-time coordinates (this is pure speculation on my part) and that may cause the
camouflaging. But that's going off on a tangent. However, such camouflaging would cause
energy to be redistributed in space-time. Thus to the rest of space-time, a camouflaged ship
could appear as exotic energy and the ship could be moving within a wormhole-like state.
>
>Yes, that's it, Ed. Now think of the fluxons in the shape of the GVP EM wavepacket surrounding
ship and field to cause this entanglement. I appreciate your comments. I have a few questions that I've
answered Marshall Barnes below for your review below:
>>
>> Dear Mr. Barnes:
>>
>> Thanks for your valued interest in our propulsion project and your correspondence. The
"attractive force I was referring to" was the projected charged particle laser plasma focused in front
of the ship.
>>>
>>> OK, for the record, what does the charged particle laser plasma do for the propulsion
process?
>> It produces a very strong attraction to the oppositely charged vehicle with "strings" attached!
The projected laser plasma is a quantum connection to the paraboloidically curved II-VI
semiconducting compound doped crystallite laser lens that provides the path of parallel transport
for a high-temperature superconducting system with (monopole) string-like effects. You can
certainly get a lot more efficiency out of pulling power than pushing power using laser and
electromagnetic quantum technology. Remember Aki Tomita and Dr. Raymond Chiao produced
monopole effects with RF waveguides and optical fibers in 1986. We can produce the same
monopole effect now with lasers similar to a free-space optics (FSO) system which is an optical
fiber system without the fiber.
>>
>> The close-adhering cloud of electrons is of opposite (attractive) charge on the vehicle's hull.
>>>
>>> OK, what is the source of the close adhering cloud of electrons and is it the opposite
charge of the hull or the laser plasma?
>>
>> The computer-controlled system of high-volume charged semiconducting diode elements
(SDEs) has been proven to produce a gravity-charge exchanging charge on the hull surface to
interact with the highly-conductive oppositely charged field. Vast amounts of energy can be stored
in the magnetic fields within the ship's layered Niobium-Tin doped superlattice hull structure and
released as a modulated charge on the hull's exterior surface. This surface charge will be as
560
effective as a 10-foot thick lead wall and highly interactive with the projected field and space-time.
This equipment is available along with very high-speed computer control equipment and software.
>>
>> The table-top lasers that use the same design (chirp pulsed amplification) at the Univ. of
Michigan which produced 109 Gauss of a magnetic attraction instilled on the projected laser beam.
Ours will be much more powerful and be in the neighborhood of a small Kerr-Schwartzchild black
hole because the beam is both rotating and charged. Now that's POWER!
>>>
>>> My question here is your definition of "small". The reason being is that I could assume
that you mean like a so-called "mini-black hole" or something that would be about the size of
your craft. Or you could mean a (relatively speaking) "small" black hole compared to the large
ones that they've found in space which are light-years across. Though it sounds fantastic,
scientists have produced magnetic fields on Earth that were larger than the Earth's magnetic
field. So I know size is a comparative thing.
>>>
>>> Also, what is it about the laser which is comparable to a black hole? Is it that it is simply
charged and rotating? Or is it that the laser produces a Einstein-Rosen bridge effect and
thereby producing the means for tunneling through space-time?
>>
>> That is it is a natural type II superconducting system with Niobium-Tin hull that has the closehexagonal packed (CHP) flux lattice structure of controlled fluxons that interact with the
Josephson's Junction to transfer the pair (the massively-charged rotating end-point of the projected
laser plasma draws the ship through the tunnel-like (or tube-like) structure and the oppositelycharged ship with particle-like commutative properties. The effects proven by existing laser
technology with the pinning of intermediate vector bosons to form the higher dimensional
superconducting pathway have already been built. Free Electron Laser Fox-Li Wiggler field to
form a magnetic bottle effect to trap and accelerate particle via the Wake Field effect. The
modulated dynamical effects from controlling these processes produces adiabatic pressure inside
the vacuum tube like projected laser plasma that pulls the ship along the projected tube-like field.
The pair will act like a gigantic boson and tunnel across the barrier of space to the desired
destination. This is the only way to travel that is much faster than traveling at the velocity-of-light
in a conventional manner.
>>
>> Of course all of these effects have to be proven by the construction and testing of our
prototypes. A good deal of our factual material and supporting evidence is well proven technology
such as the World record breaking Berkeley Lab's electromagnet is made out of the same material
as our hull; niobium-tin; the properties of which for instance; spherical niobium producing
observable fractional 1/3 charge. Of course, their magnet was cooled to prevent quenching.
However, through the wonderful properties of these same materials in the capped-cone shape of
our ship with controlled (gravity) surface charge, we are producing a high-temperature
Macroscopically observable superconducting state (MOSS).
>>
>> You might want to do a PC search on "fluxons, quantum tunneling, and the Josephson's
Junction" to get a jist of what we are talking about. There is much information to be found on the
Net to prove what I am talking about. We are certainly talking about some very powerful energies
we are working with in our design. It will be exciting to turn on the first full sized prototype of
that bad machine one day soon. Can't wait!
>>
>> On top of fooling Mother Nature into thinking that we are one gigantic Electron-hole pair
(exciton) and the fluxons interacting with a Josephson Junction.
561
>>>
>>> OK, in regular English here, I believe you're describing the tunneling process. Correct?
>>
>> That is correct. And we are saying the WKB Approx. rules that say it is zero for Macro
tunneling. I mean check out fluxons, Niobium, and tunneling to see what I am saying here. This is
the only way that would possibly be feasible or have half-a-chance at working to get us to a
habitable planet within our lifetime. It would take 110 years to even get to the nearest star
traveling in a spaceship at the SOL.
>>
>>We have a lot to prove and we are more than ready. We have been ready to build and test
prototypes for a while now. We have been successful with some major heavy hitter aerospace
firms to acquire complete backing. But the economy has kept us from getting out of the paper
stage into building prototypes to test. We certainly have the quality manufacturers ready to build
our stuff. No one can refute that.
>>
>> To traverse space, we will pass as a boson! Needs proving. But that's the jixt of it, Marshall.
>>
>> How far are you from proving it?
>>
>> We are I would say 2-to-5 years depending on the amount of funding. In fact, I am certain
enough to say they can shoot me if the ship doesn't work. I mean it will at least fly. Flat out!
S-335. from Andrew Potter forwarding Q&A between Ed Halerewitcz, Jr. and Larry Maurer
From : Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Fwd: Some Answers.....
Date : Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:22:41 -0600
> X-Sender: lmaurer@unitelnw.com@mail.unitelnw.com
> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 19:05:08 -0800
> To: potterae@email.uc.edu
> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>
> Subject: Some Answers.....
>
> Andrew:
>
> Check out the following information I dug up to somewhat prove our design. Of course, all of
our claims have to be proven by actually building and testing our prototypes.
>
>> Ed: some answers to your comments. I have so much more to send please give me
some time to produce further supportive evidence as it were.
>>
>> "An electric field surrounding a charged body is analogous in almost every respect to a
gravitational field surrounding a massive body. Both fields (electric & magnetic) cause
other objects within them to move.; gravity attracts massive objects whereas the electron
fields can do both -- repel or attract other objects" ("The Electrification of Thunderstorms",
562
Earle R. Williams, Scientific American magazine, Vol. 259, No. 5, November 1988, pg.
91). "Unlike the wave reflected from water and glass, however, the wave reflected from a
metal surface has almost the full intensity of the incoming wave (apart from small energy
losses due to the friction of vibrating electrons in the surface). This is why white metals
like Niobium are so shiny. They reflect almost all visible light regardless of its frequency"
("How Light Interacts With Living Matter", Victor Weiskopf, Scientific American
magazine, Vol. 219, No. 3, September 1968, pg. 71)
>>
>> There is also mention of the diode skin producing gravity waves through semiconductor
states. To me, this implies gravitational control. But Chiao has proposed something similar
(I suppose you could mean this, but I doubt it). However, what I really take this to mean is
the surface waves of the electrons on the skin so I would see this as a source of confusion.
>>
>>> Edward Halerewicz, Jr.
>> Warp Drive Today
>> http://da_theoretical1.tripod.com
>> Web Master: ATPG
>> http://galileo.spaceports.com/~atpg2
>>>>
>>>> From : Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
>>>> To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
>>>> Subject : Fwd: Re: Curious as to what your opinion is of UNITEL spacecraft
design
>>>> Date : Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:43:45 -0500
>>>>
>>>> Mark,
>>>>
>>>> Do you mind telling me how I sent an e-mail to Edward Halerewicz, Jr. and got
one back from Larry Maurer? And an old e-mail that he sent me before at that?
>>>>
>>>> -Andrew
>>>>>
>>>>> Return-Path: <hal_warp@hotmail.com>
>>>>> Received: from cliff.msbb.uc.edu (cliff.edw2.uc.edu [10.23.1.159]) by
email.msbb.uc.edu
(8.9.2/8.9.2)
with
ESMTP
id
SAA15388
for
<potterae@email.uc.edu>; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:34:00 -0500 (EST)
>>>>> Received: from hotmail.com (oe65.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.16.200]) by
cliff.msbb.uc.edu
(8.9.2/8.9.2)
with
SMTP
id
PAA06998
for
<potterae@email.uc.edu>; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:33:47 -0500 (EST)
>>>>> Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:25:22 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [65.168.106.16]
>>>>> From: "Edward Halerewicz, Jr." <hal_warp@hotmail.com>
>>>>> To: "Andrew Potter" <potterae@email.uc.edu>
>>>>> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20030112170936.00acba10@email.uc.edu>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Curious as to what your opinion is of UNITEL spacecraft
design
>>>>> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:21:44 -0600
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, I'm curious as how it is that you know of me and why my opinion is
important. As for the book, I have only received the E-book. I have posted my
563
initial comments from briefly reading it at the following URL:
http://da_theoretical1.tripod.com/unitelbook.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I have not shown to any colleagues. As Einstein once put it: "I never met a
real physicist before." But a colleague that I know who has had communications
with UNITEL and read the link had the same general opinion that I did.
>>>>>
>>>>> The book is interesting but it doesn't prove the design would work. So I
can't accept any of the claims as facts. I would say the ideas presented are within
the realm of possibility. But the ideas are in no way proven. The laser propulsion
systems does seem possible if (and a big IF) BECs can propagate QCD affects
within a QED vacuum. However ,"Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling" I had a
problem with -- one -- the use of hyperspace.
>>>>>
>>>>> According to string theory, only bosons should be able to propagate
through extra dimensions, not fermions, this is called brane jumping. Even in
string theory if certain fermions can pass into certain branes, it wouldn't mean that
all would. Also, hyperspace shouldn't have a time frame which propagate linearly
as seen from our dimension -- at least according to existing theory -- but through
complex space. However, if the "ship" can phase itself out of space-time, it would
appear as exotic matter and in the fashion could behave as a wormhole.
>>>>>
>>>>> So it's interesting. It's based on real science and not fill-in-the-blank
science like Star Trek. But nothing really constable as proof. For that, they would
have to get their "Protoype 1-A" up and working. If that does affect the ZPF, then
it would prove the concept. I have yet to fully look at everything and give a reply
to Larry, but those are my thoughts at the moment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Edward Halerewicz, Jr.
>>>>>
>>>>>----- Original Message ---->>>>>> From: "Andrew Potter" <potterae@email.uc.edu>
>>>>>> To: <hal_warp@hotmail.com>
>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 4:13 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Curious as to what your opinion is of UNITEL spacecraft
design
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Edward,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been following the company UNITEL for a while. Larry has
informed me that you bought the Aerospace book from him (Quantum
Electromagnetic Laser Propulsion). I'm wondering what you think of this?
Have you shown the book to any colleagues in theoretical physics? It seems to
"ring true" and make sa lot of sense to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> -Andrew Potter
564
S-336. from Dr. Velimir Abramovic regarding his "snail-mail" & web addresses
From: "Velimir Abramovic" <velimir@EUnet.yu>
Date: Thu, May 29, 2003 1:09 am
To: <kram@stealthskater.com>
> From: kram@stealthskater.com [mailto:kram@stealthskater.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 7:21 AM
> To: velimir@EUnet.yu
> Subject: mailing address
>
>Dear Dr. Abramovic:
>
I have converted my website's html pages to MS-Word .doc files and used embedded
hyperlinks/bookmarks to make a large Word-based folder function as an Internet site. That's
why I call it a "Site-on-a-CD". The only drawback is that it is a "snapshot"; meaning what I
put on the CD today may not be what resided on my site 6 months ago or a year from now.
>
>
Be that as it may, it's the best I can do to preserve what I have accumulated over-theyears. And it will serve as a backup in case my site ever goes away. I've sent these to
laypeople and scientists alike. It does save downloading-and-saving time. I'd be flattered if
they were copied and redistributed. They're *free* and represent my small contribution to
something potentially greater for humankind.
>
> I'll send you one. If the following address is not correct, please e-mail me back:
>
> Dr Velimir Abramovic
> INSTITUTE FOR THE SCIENCE OF TIME
> Kosmajskih partizana 42
> 11 460 Barajevo (Lisovic)
> SERBIA and MONTENEGRO
> EUROPE
>
>
There is also a large "diary" of e-mails on the CD that I have accumulated over-theyears. I don't advertise it to the general public because of privacy matters but it's also
accessible (for the time-being) at http://www.stealthskater.com/Email_Diary.htm . It's way
too LARGE for anyone to print-off.
>
>
And there is a 45-minute .mpg file of a collection of eye-witness UFO
testimonies/reports from around-the-world. I can only store those at my website as zipped
files or else my bandwidth allocations would be rapidly consumed.
>
>Have a good day, my friend.
>-- Mark
Dear Mark,
Yes, the snail-mail address is correct.
Please note that from today my permanent web address is scienceoftime.org and e-address is:
office@scienceoftime.org
565
I am very eager to read your file. Do you have any chats over time-problem?
For the Science of New civilization in best will.
velimir
S-337. from Andrew Potter regarding Internet rumors on UNITEL
Subject: From the Pleiades....with love
From: Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
Date: Thu, May 29, 2003 1:27 am
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Mark,
Well, the mystery just gets deeper and deeper. I dug up these e-mails on Project GreenGlow.
You may have seen them. It's fairly obvious that the sighting wasn't UNITEL's only "inspiration"
for this craft.
-Andrew
>
> www.unitelnw.com/xtg <===check when site comes back up.
>
> Hope we can now demystify a lot of things. We also remember that the guys from UNITEL
claim to have contact to the "Pleiadian" and consider the option that these humans might be visitors
from our own future or maybe could be ourselves.
>
> We also remember the thesis of Illobrand von Ludwiger (Zen master and the world-leading
expert in the unified field theory of Burkhard Heim and also speaker at the University of Sussex,
Forcefield Propulsion Workshop). He mentioned the option that humans from the Future could
have given us something to study and learn from it. But for what purpose? And would these
future guys tell us that they are from the Future or would it be better to tell us some nonsense?
>
> We also remember that Illobrand von Ludwiger (DaimlerChrysler's leading gravity physicists)
was in touch with Prof. Moravec (I recently mentioned him when discussing my coming meeting
with Prof. Penrose) who worked at the Daimler-Benz (now DaimlerChrysler) Future Technology
Research Center which is located in Berlin. They have a second lab in Palo Alto. The guys here
are working on neural networks and artificial intelligence.
>
> Presently I am working on my PhD thesis at the Institute of Bionics and Evolution Technology
which is mainly sponsored by the DaimlerChrysler Future Technology Research Center in Berlin.
Prof. Rechenberg is the guru of so-called "evolution algorithm" and knows the head of the research
center who is a part time professor at TU Berlin. What was his name?
>
> I suggest we concentrate on the scientific aspects as the philosophical and mystical aspects would
cause tremendous confusion at this stage of discussions.
>
566
> Remember what Prof. Penrose (Sir Roger) is thinking about artificial intelligence. He thinks it is
possible but with a different way than considered today. So will we build bioroboters in the distant
future?
>
> Best regards,
> "B.G."
>
> See: http://www.figu.org or http://www.billymeier.com for info on Pleiadean aliens.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------>
> "On page 57 there are some new books quoted. Maybe one of us has read one or more of them.
Here we go:
>
> 1. Beyond the Science Wars: The Missing Discourse about Science and Society.
> 2. Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means.
> 3. Einstein in Love: A Scientific Romance.
> 4. Einstein: The Formative Years, 1879-1909
> 5. Light Science: Physics and the Visual Arts
> 6. Bose-Einstein Condensation of Excitons and Biexcitons and Coherent Nonlinear Optics with
Excitons
> 7. Dynamics of Galaxies
> 8. Statistical Mechanics: A Short Treatise
> 9. Modern Introductory Physics
>
> I stopped at 6 first as you talked about optical devices. What is mentioned in book 6 is also close
to the design of UNITEL."
>
>
On
Amazon.com:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail//books/0521580994/reviews/qid=1054183863/sr=11-1/ref=sr_11_1/102-4941995-6914555
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
> "In this context I also thought about the work of Larry Maurer and Michaeal Miller at UNITEL.
They also couple the color forces with sound. They also talk about free quarks and magnetic
monopoles. Can we learn from them? Please remember that UNITEL is working on a design
which is based on "cosmic technology acquisition". They do not like to publicly mention the stuff
with Pleiadians etc. But it doesn't wonder me that Dr. Terence W. Barrett (at the time working in
the Technology Acquisition of Boeing Defense) was highly interested. Personally, I am much
interested in the electronic part of the technology which helps to resist high temperatures:
http://www.unitelnw.com/aerospc/smart.htm
>
> However, you are just talking about black holes. In this context, I should quote from the book of
Prof. Kussner which I will upload as soon as possible.
>
> We probably need to find the analogy between electrodynamics and gravitation to solve the
problem with "black holes" and "neutron stars" which are a mind production according to Prof.
Kussner.
>
> Best regards,
567
> "B.G."
>
>----------------------------->
> "From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@u...>
> Date: Thu Mar 1, 2001 7:01 pm
> Subject: Re: [antigrav] Fw: Future Spacecraft Propulsion Systems
>
> At 11:10 AM 3/1/01 EST, you wrote:
>In a message dated 2/21/01 1:11:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, lmaurer@u... writes:
>>
>>Hi Larry,
>>
>>To where are you referring exactly?
>
> Hello Ed:
>
> Thank you for your interest in our projects.
>
> Any habitable planet that will allow us to settle there without disrupting the locals. Earth is
already overpopulated and if mankind is to continue, we must find new land & frontier. In what
few discussions we have had, the Pleides would be our first "direction". If you would like to see the
Earth at night shots at http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthlights2_dmsp_big.jpg
you will know just how populated Earth is!
>
>> While your site contains many concepts in line with the theories of Tom Bearden, the exact
manifestation of your interstellar craft seems wholly original (congratulations, by the way, I've
found your site most fascinating). If you are allowed, can you tell us about the source of your
inspiration?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ed Scanlan
>
> I posted an attachment "Sightings" on February 26 that gave the complete blow-by-blow
description of how we got started on our aerospace propulsion. It has been nearly 20 years since we
were accosted by the vehicles of the design that we advanced today. We do not have any idea of
where these ships came from or why or who they were. After several years of scrutinizing what we
saw, we have international patents and several top aerospace designers working with us. It is really
a project killer to even bring the sightings up but the quantum MQT potential is so tremendously
powerful in scope, we have a strong inkling the ships actually tunneled back in time. Sort of
completing a "loop" in time I can only conjecture. Either that or somewhere we have picked up
some alien admirers that wanted to give us this gift (which seems more like a nemesis sometimes).
>
>Hopefully we will be able to construct and test prototypes soon. Please stay tuned and we will
have better news to give. I can resend the sightings document (to be viewed with jeff03.jpg on our
website posting at www.unitelnw.com/xtg. I can also send you our prototype desciption
document that focuses on the WKB Approximation (being zero for macro) with math provided by
Yoshinari Minami. Let me know....
>
568
> Regards,
> Larry Maurer- UNITEL"
>
> --------------------------------->
"> Larry Maurer wrote:
>>
>> In quantum chromodynamics (QCD) the colors red, green, & blue are used for labeling
purposes of quarks, etc. We use the minimum of 3 separate RGB EM frequencies to produce
true EM wavepackets in our beam as per Dr. Chiao description.
>>
>>Consider the EM tranmission bandwidth of the earth's atmoosphere. Least attenuated is the
optical spectrum. Call this red-green-blue, or Roy G. Biv. After some milleniums we have
learned to see this. Blue most recently. There are no references to the color blue, except in
relatively modern texts. To suggest the physics of a space drive based on this anthropomorphic
principle is historically accurate. Lo and behold, we are God's image, the center of the
universe. One knows better. Funky thing: I hear we look 'grey' to them."
>
> ------------------------------------> "B.G."
>
> BTW, Larry Maurer from UNITEL (www.unitelnw.com) agreed with the thesis of hollow
planets. He told us that his UNITEL craft could tunnel through the Earth's crust and reach the inner
world. IMO, such a thesis becomes more and more consistent than everything existent on the
cosmology market.
>
> Today, I also found some of my copies of Foundations of Physics papers:
>
> 1. Unification of Gravitation and Electromagnetism by M. W. Evans, 26(9), pp. 1243, 1996
>
> 2. Hypercomplex Quantum Mechanics by L. P. Horwitz, 26(6), pp. 851, 1996
>
> 3. Global Effects in Quaternionic Quantum Field Theory by S. P. Brumby, G. C. Joshi, 26(12),
pp.. 1591, 1996
>
> 4. Nonlocal Forces of Inertia in Cosmoloy by Andre K. T. Assis and Peter Graneau, 26(2), pp.
271, 1996
>
> 5. Book Review by James F. Woodward: Where Does the Weirdness Go? by David Lindley,
Basic Books, 1996. Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point by Huw Price, Oxford University Press,
1966
> --> 1. Revolution, Relativity, and Reality
> 2. Where Does the Weirdness Go?
> 3....26(7), pp. 955, 1996
>
> 6. Book Review by James F. Woodward: Time: Towards a Consistent Theory. C. K. Raju,
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994 26(12), pp. 1725, 1996
>
> More from this papers later. But who can tell us more about Peter Graneau and James F.
Woodward who is told to be a very promising candidate for antigravity in the Edwards AFB papers
569
also quoted by Rob Chambers. I also have all public reports. Would not wonder about the content
of the classified reports.
>
> Let me remind you that the head of the Edwards AFB research Dr. Mead was former antigrav
member. I catched his addres from a private list of Mrs. Froning and Larry Maurer. They are all
cooperating.
>
> So where are the applications?
>
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, "B.G." wrote:
>>
>> Are (plasma) suns Einstein-Rosen bridges?
>>
>> What is better than killing time? Killing inconsistencies which means nothing other than
searching for truth.
>>
>> I thought about the non-fiction novel "Hollow Earth" authored by Prof. Rudy Rucker who
also described the inner sun as a Einstein-Rosen bridge. In this novel, the heroes (including
Edgar Allan Poe) left the inner world through the inner sun. They used a living metallic (nanoengineered) flying saucer as a vessel. Is Jack on the right track with the idea of living
machines? It is not in contrast to the comments of sufi John Bennett who was a friend of
Patrick Flanagan. I wonder who was not a friend of Patrick.:-)
>>
>> However, advanced vehicles could come from the inner world through the inner sun and
from the Outer World through the Sun of the planetary system.
S-338 - from Tom Skeggs regarding the "basics" of the Montauk Project
To: "Stealth Skater"
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
Subject: your new website ; my backup CD
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 06:27:55 -0400
> Hi Tom !
>
>
I'll be happy to. Your previous 'Star Chamber' site was very thought-provoking. I've
always maintained that the remote-viewing method was the only practical way to travel
through space. You don't need life-support and you don't put the auto-immune system up
against alien ecosystems/bacteria/viruses for which it would take generations to mutate and
adapt.
>
>
Your concept seems similar to what the legendary Montauk Project purported to have
achieved. Of course with that so much dis-info and outright fiction was added it's nearly
impossible to extract the truths. There was a 'Bryan' fellow at Tap-Ten that knew you quite
well and passed this along to me as he was trying to get UNITEL funded. (We were mutual
supporters of the UNITEL effort.)
>
570
> I have sent back-up copies of my website on CD to people around the world. Fortunately
I haven't been swamped by requests so I have done this all for free. Cost is just that of a CD
+ postage. I just sent some to Bearden, Puthoff, and Tegmark. Also on the CD is a rather
large collection of e-mails that should be illuminating, not only to the various theories but
also to the frequently combative nature of their proponents. If you send me a snail-mail
address I'll be happy to send you a copy.
>
>Bye for now -> -- Mark
Thanks for posting my link.
Currently work has stopped on the FTA because I suffered a bad fall at work, so I'm unable to do
much on the FTA. But I have been writing a new paper to finish off my research into spontaneous
teleportation. I hope to publish it within the next week or so.
Your assumption regarding the Montauk Project is correct. It's a special place for me and a great
deal of disinformation has been the written about it. The original writers didn't add much credibility to
the story. Having a keen interest in electronic engineering, I can usually see through all the disinfo and
get to grips with the overall concept of the technology which was being used. ERV sessions have been
useful but sometimes very disturbing!
One book called The Montauk Files by K.B Wells, Jr. is very informative. I must go now
All the best
Tom
S-339. from NIDS regarding UNITEL's proposals
From: "Colm Kelleher" <nids@anv.net> Add to Address Book
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Thu, June 5, 2003 11:08 am
Subject: Re: patented propulsion breakthrough had its roots in a 1981 Eugene, Oregon UFO
"demonstration"
Thanks for contacting NIDS.
This is the response from one of two reviewers -- both physicists who examined your submission.
The second reviewer concurred. "I see it as techno-babble where they string together concepts, any one
of which is a 100-year project even if right. Example: 'We'll make a tractor beam by generating an
isolated magnetic charge by use of a Bose Einstein condensate.' None of which they can hope to
accomplish in several lifetimes and probably wouldn't work anyway. But they worked in a Star Trek
phrase: a buzzword in magnetics that's just an idea and a fashionable field of research that takes the best
of the labs to do on a microscopic scale for tiny bits of a second, all in one sentence. Then go to the next
sentence........"
Given these 2 independent reviews, our organization cannot go forward. Thanks for contacting NIDS.
571
Colm Kelleher
NIDS
----- Original Message ----> From: <kram@stealthskater.com>
> To: <nids@anv.net>
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 5:40 AM
> Subject: patented propulsion breakthrough had its roots in a 1981 Eugene, Oregon UFO
"demonstration"
>
UNITEL received a generic patent for a unique supercrystalline laser lens which they
hope will bring quantum tunneling to the real Macroscopic world opening up applications in
quantum computing, interstellar travel, and cellular regeneration & repair. Their problems
have been as much in the theoretical side as in the materials sciences arena (where only a
handful of labs are equipped to do molecular beam epitaxy on Type II semiconductor
materials).
>
>
In their zeal to create, engineers do not often exhibit or practice the "purest" science. In
UNITEL's case, their theories were often dismissed by "professional" physicists because of
what appeared to be misused concepts. Although most of these cutting-edge physical effects
are well-documented (e.g., Lamb Shift), they are rarely used in combination with one another
as in the UNITEL proposals. As such the UNITEL designs still rest largely "on paper"
awaiting $10MM funding to start the ~2-year construction of the 5-foot diameter, 1molecule thick laser lens at the University of Chicago's MicroPhysics Lab (formerly operated
for the US Army by Northrop-Grumman).
>
>
But some progress has been made as new experiments have validated several of
UNITEL's central premises:
>
> (1) http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Extreme_Light.doc <= the Scientific
American article on "Extreme Light" which explains UNITEL's proposal to use "Chirp Pulse
Amplification" of lasers to create a plasma field that will induce gravitation and possibly
"fold" space .
>
> (2) http://da_theoretical1.tripod.com/unitelbook.html <= a critical review of UNITEL's
"Quantum Electromagnetic Laser Propulsion" book by physicist Ed Halerewicz, Jr. which
explains the complicated process in simple terms as a 'tractor beam in reverse'. Sample
excerpt: "The UNITEL craft projects a monochromatic beam of light which has a magnetic
charge. This attracts the spacecraft and propels it forward. The beam is actually a 'white' laser
powered by a high-energy superconducting state, similar in nature to a Bose-Einstein
condensation. The magnetic charge of the beam is then derived through the color force. It is
also proposed that interstellar travel may be possible by treating spacetime as a potential
well. Through an entangled electron field surrounding the spacecraft they hope to make it
appear as a 'giant electron' and have it tunnel through spacetime. In short they propose a
revolutionary new form of technology based upon some obscure but tested notions in
physics."
>
> (3) http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/UNITEL_7.doc <= a consultant
physicist's simplified mathematical analysis of some core UNITEL concepts regarding
monopoles, Bose-Einstein Condensates, and magnetic fields. [note: as in any mathematical
572
derivation, assuming the math is correct the witnessed results are only as good as the
assumptions made in the model. No matter how elegant the theory, the jury is still out on
room-temperature superconductors, Higgs particles, and Kaluza-Klein "extra" dimensions.]
>
> and maybe most importantly .
>
> (4) http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/UNITEL_8.doc <= the 1981 Eugene, Oregon
UFO incident that started it all. Excerpted from their book-in-progress, "Flying Colors"
describes the event that was witnessed by thousands of citizens and police officers and
started engineer Larry Maurer and physics sage Michael Miller on a decade-long quest to
replicate what they feel certain was deliberately "demonstrated" for them. They don't know
why it was done for them. Nor do they understand the purpose of the strange maneuvers they
witnessed. While acknowledging he's heard of the other disc-shaped objects that are so
predominant in UFO folklore (e.g., Lazar's "Sport Model", the Tremonton-Utah saucer, etc.),
Maurer has consistently only talked about the cigar-shaped ("mothership") and orbiting
teardrop-shaped craft they personally witnessed. He has never offered any opinion as to the
nature of these other craft so often reported. Neither Maurer nor Miller have seen other UFOs
before-or-since.
>
>
This also explains why their design concepts have been rigorously critiqued. They are
essentially back-engineering from an observation-demonstration and are sorting through all
known-and- postulated physics (no matter how obscure) to arrive at a model which fits what
they saw perform. (Not unlike cosmological models that attempt to reconcile all astronomical
discoveries with appropriate lab experiments.)
>
>
Other companies have similar notions concerning laser-based "gravitational wave"
propulsion
systems.
Check
out
Transdimensional
Technologies
(http://www.tdimension.com) of Huntsville, AL. They sell military-oriented products and
have some partnerships with NASA. One of their research projects is an "Asymmetric
Gravitational Wave Propulsion System" (http://www.tdimension.com/projects.html).
UNITEL's Maurer contacted them to see if they would be interested in adapting their
technologies for use in a "hover mode" in the UNITEL craft. But he was adamant that
UNITEL's revolutionary RF-activated superlattice laser was a quantum leap up over any
others including Transdimensional's dye-based laser, and the UNITEL laser would be used
for all sub-lightspeed and hyperspatial travel.
>
>
Additional UNITEL-related documents/e-mails/magazine articles are stored at
http://www.stealthskater.com/UNITEL_background.htm along with Word-versions of
UNITEL's previous website (while it's being reconstructed).
S-340. from Dr. Reginald Jaynes regarding adding <link> from his website
From : "Reginald Jaynes" <dr_jaynes@hotmail.com>
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Hi, New link
Date : Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:15:32 -0400
Things have been very busy for me lately. I finally got time to update my web page so I was able to
add a link to your page.
573
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~reginald/
talk to you later,
-Reggie.
S-341. from Thomas Skeggs regarding remote-viewing Montauk
From : "Thomas Skeggs"
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : Re: Wells book; exotic matter
Date : Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:52:32 +0000
> Hi Tom,
>
> I already have a copy of the Wells book. He paid "lip service" to the SkyBooks crowd by
inferring that he wouldn't be surprised if the alien connection were not true although he didn't
uncover any of that during his investigations. The stuff about the gun bunkers etc. was very
believable and down-to-earth. The other stuff about having the Montauk Indian spiritwoman "guide" him was not so believable. I don't have much problem with remote-viewing
but I do have problems giving credibility to ghosts & spirits. But that's because I was trained
as a chemist and then chemical engineer. I try to keep an open mind.
>
> The Montauk books by SkyBooks (mostly written now by "Peter Moon" - real name Vince
B.) got wilder to the point of absolute unbelievability, causing doubt among many as to was
any of it true. Someone told me what was done at Montauk was to experiment programming
"moles" that would infiltrate a society and then carry out pre-programmed instructions upon
receipt of a coded transmission. The actual Montauk "StarGate" stuff happened at
Plattsburgh Air Force Base according to this same person. How far they got is still up in the
air. Chica Bruce told me the Philadelphia Experiment movie was financed by a European
(German???) company who was a big fan of Montauk. In her book -- the Philadelahia
Experiment Murder (Phil Schneider) -- at least she learned from Moon's mistakes and put
disclaimers at the beginning of every chapter.
>
> You can read more about these guys in my e-mail "diary" at
http://www.stealthskater.com/Email_Diary.htm. If you ever do change your mind about
the CD, let me know. I don't mind the expense if it's going to someone responsible. I just
don't want all the work to go down the tubes if I die and the site shortly follows. Send me an
alternate address if you wish and let the owner of that address forward it to you.
>
> Even though I majored in chemical engineering -- and made most of my living as an IBM
mainframe programmer -- I built my share of electronics projects during the glory days of
Heathkit. I put together oscilloscopes and signal generators. After a while I figured why
they did things a certain way and began drilling and etching my own circuit boards and
publishing hobbyist articles.
>
> One of my hobbies is roller-skating. I met one of my fiances at a rink and we started a
model-photography/music-recording studio. My day job paid the bills for the entreprenurial
studio. I got a lot of my model from the acquaintenaces I made at the skating rinks. Like
574
electronics, all this was SELF-TAUGHT employing trial-and-(Much!)error. Eventually I got
up to speed and published some of this effort (see http://www.stealthskater.com/SSS.htm).
I was most proud of the sets I created by hand. ALl permanently background-lit and I'm not
a carpenter/handyman! I tried to make them as versatile as possible because I was limited by
available floor space. Most of my investment went for lumber and wiring -- NOT for
camera-related equipment.
>
> "Willoughby" was the last name of Bryan who said he knew you. Bryan was on UNITEL's
board as he was convincing them he could get them funds to build their prototype laser lens.
It turned out that Bryan was doing a lot of bs-ing and I think UNITEL kicked him out for
that. But UNITEL is not "angel" either when it comes to the song-and-dance "spin" act.
Some of Bryan's far-out correspondences are also in the e-mail "diary". Also was a remakr
by famed Area-51 "Intercepter" Tom Mahood (civil engineer turned physicist) who told me
'exotic matter' is not as far off as most peope think it is. Don't know where he got that from
although he's pretty good friends with Puthoff.
>
>Have a good weekend, Tom!
>
> -- Mark
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your e-mail. It's taken a bit of time to reply cause of work and stuff.
I hope to set up a P.O.Box address later in the year so you can send a copy of the CD.
Just a note on Montauk. When I remote-viewed that location, I mainly visited the bunkers, and there
does appear to be some expansion work carried out sometime, with extra stairways and passage ways.
When I remote -view, I also sense a general feel of the place. This what makes it special for me.
The mood changes so quickly there. From building to building and even on different days.
Sometimes it feels fantastic, warm, and friendly. Other times it feels cold, depressing, even sinister.
One part outside the one bunker was some long grass and a chain link fence. I kept hearing a buzzing
sound. I kept thinking the radar was still active. But it may be to do with grasshoppers or crickets in the
long grass. Much of the RV work I did was carried out last August.
To me, Montauk carried out mind-control experiments. The place has the right "feel" to it.
As for time-travel, I keep an open mind. But I have found little RV data yet on such experiments.
Just a few flashes of personnel. I just been unable to get clear audio-visual RV data from that time
period.
The overall scan of the U.S. for time-travel seems to indicate possible tests have been carried out.
But they usually end up going "tits up" and people have been hurt. Some badly. I have had difficulty
pinning down the actually locations.
The Russians have been running tests at Black Box near St Petersburg. Block 2 Level 3. I am
unable -- and unwilling -- to RV that site. It's too dangerous and I just can't go there. I just sense that
such tests have been conducted at that location. But something tells me to stay away. So I do.
I must go now. All the best.
575
Tom
S-342. from Edward Halerewicz, Jr. regarding UNITEL, Bob Lazar, Edward Teller, Andrei
Sakharov
From: "Edward Halerewicz, Jr." <halgravity@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, June 19, 2003 4:04 pm
To: kram@stealthskater.com
For starters, I would appreciate if my file wasn't publicly released before it's actually posted by the
"Journal". If it's publicly released, it's one thing. I would hate for conspiracy theorists to well theorize.
Yes, I'm aware of submillimeter test for extra dimensions. I doubt they will find any. It is also
believed that they may reveal themselves in particle accelerators in the future. It's possible … but I
would be surprised if they actually do find anything. And yes- I am familiar with Larry's tale of the
"ship" and discussions with the Eugene Police.
As for bubble universes, I doubt that any such thing was observed. However they are possible in
theory. Micho Kaku's Book Hyperspace explains such a thing. They even made a few appearances on
the sci-fi television series "Andromeda" (the only sci-fi show I know which references string theory).
As for reviewers rejecting things ay easy mistakes, I don't really see a problem with that. If they
goofed on easy things, they probably really messed up on the harder things. This is standard procedure
really for review articles in scientific journals. But since they gave some supportive nuggets, I generally
let it go by to see if there was anything of merit.
Hmmm … [Bieglow's] NIDS "National Institute for Discovery Science?"
somewhat suspect myself.
I find that group
I'll bite on the Lazar issue. I've had read his story and am convinced it is fraudulent. He says things
like "gravitons are the currently accepted theory of gravitation." [SSS note: Lazar said of the 2 main
theories -- quantum gravitons and electromagnetic waves -- most mainstreamers regard
'gravitons' as the leading cause of gravity] BS! Gravitons have never be accepted or proven; it's just
a hunch.
I could go on-and-on. He also mentions working at EG&G. That company -- at least in the past -has been responsible for recording atomic blasts. Isn't it interesting he "reverted" back to photography?
Chances are that if he heard a story, it was likely him helping to film that low-yield atomic blast which
he claims is how he got his job.
He also claims to have a degree in MHD which involves complex differential calculus. Yet he
couldn't solve simple differential equations. Stating that Element-115 is orange is just wrong. The
Periodic Table shows that 115 should be a whitish-silver color -- not orange. (LLNL also put out a paper
where a Russian group is hoping to create 115; see the last page of:
http://www.llnl.gov/str/JanFeb02/pdfs/01_02.3.pdf).
He also talks like how most people think a physicist sound like. But they really don't. It is really
clear that he was never a physicist and never had a background in it.
576
And when Dr. Teller said on tape "if you ask me that question again, I will just sit and remain
silent", now that's how real physicist acts! Even if he did witness alien technology, he still should be
familiar with Newtonian mechanics. Which he is clearly not.
As for GCT Inc., I am aware of that group and recently they've been rejected in competition for the
X-Prize. They have not really done anything to show there concept will work -- just how they think
things should work. As far as I can tell, their design seems to be just getting into orbit. Although I
found some background material on a 'David Hudson' -- a farmer who discovered a superconducting
state of matter (ORMEs as you call them) -- sounds like it could be legit. But I have no way to
collaborate it.
It would not be strange of Kaku to look into magnetism as it can be related to gravitation in General
Relativity by an effect known as "gravitomagnetism" which is responsible for bodies rotating the fabric
of spacetime by "frame-dragging."
As for Sakharov, he had only one over-hyped 5-page paper on "quantum gravitation" (much of his
work focused on nuclear theory for obvious reasons) in which he suggested gravitation is simply a
collection of quantum forces similar to how atoms can form intermolecular forces. His idea -- while
interesting -- moved physics very little and there hasn't been much improvement on his concept.
And as for the Russian claims for stable 114, 116, 118, it would be great if they are true. But the
conference papers listed by the Russian Institute don't seem to indicate such a paper. So I am not sure if
the reporting is correct.
In general, I keep an open mind towards things which can be scientifically tested or verified. I don't
go for the Lazar or mind-control hoopla. It all seems bogus to me.
-- Edward Halerewicz, Jr.
Truss Technician/Independent Researcher
http://da_theoretical1.tripod.com/index.htm
S-343. from Thomas Skeggs just "touching bases"
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
Date: Thu, June 26, 2003 6:26 pm
To: kram@stealthskater.com
> Subject: latest from Barnes on debunking Al Bielek's Montauk claims
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 06:57:05 -0400 (EDT)
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> The result of a 5-year investigation by noted P-X researcher Marshall Barnes and two
others into Al Bielek's claims regarding the Montauk Project have been posted at =>
http://www.bielek-debunked.com/ . I archived the 3 most important documents at =>
http://www.stealthskater.com/PX.htm#Bielek (item 16). This seems to corroborate what
both you and I have come to believe, namely that some covert agency took advantage of a
decommissioned Air Force Base (with built-in security) to test mind-control experiments on
577
subjects (both willing and unwitting). The actual Montauk "stargate"/time-travel stuff
appears to have happened elsewhere (Plattsburgh AFB???).
>
> Announcement of Barnes' revelations was also posted at => http://www.pxarchive.de . I
also archived some of its more important essays at Item #17 on the same (above) page.
>
> A physicist has sort of come to UNITEL's aid in mathematically validating at least some of
their claims. Check out http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/UNITEL_7.doc and
.../UNITEL_9.doc . They evolved over 20+ years from the 1981 Eugene, Oregon UFO
encounter-"demonstration" highlighted in ... /UNITEL_8.doc . At least Maurer honestly
feels that they were deliberately chosen for behold this technology but that's not apparent in
the autobiography (rather communicated to me by e-mail). When I asked the guys out at
Robert Bigelow's NIDS (at the "Sherman" ranch in Utah), one responded by saying
something about light strings being currently "fashionable" in physics circles but it would
take them (UNITEL) 100 years to get it working (if it can be made to work).
>
> I actually desktop-published 90 copies of UNITEL's QELP book myself using my own
home equipment and sent them to them (see http://www.stealthskater.com/Book.htm).
While I don't appreciate the meaning behind a lot of the concepts (and equations), my
chemical-engineering background lets me spot obvious grammatical mistakes in scientific
terminology. Plus I may have inherited some writing & photography abilities from my father,
who was in photo-reconnaissance in WWII and a newspaper editor afterwards.
>
> Your aerospace prototype seems to use some of the same electro-grav concepts Stan Deyo
wrote about in his books. I've seen mention of vehicles utilizing capacitors before. I archived
some of his stuff at => http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/WorldReports_1.doc
(do a 'Find' on "Deyo" to rapidly scroll to it).
>
> You seem to be pretty sophisticated and comfortable with remote-viewing. Have you ever
thought about relating your experiences, either at a website or a published book? I -- for one - would be eager to hear about them. I find you very credible. If you think it would detract
from your other investigations (the aerospace demonstrator or the Star Chamber), you could
always publish it under an alias. I have noticed that some of the quantum physicists have r-v
capabilities (e.g., Pitkanen of Helsinki, Finland). How much of this has 'influenced' (pardon
the pun) their theoretical developments is anyone's guess.
>
> There must be "obstacles" that can be put up to defend against remote-viewing. I've heard
about the Soviet's psychotronic alarms. And I've heard where the ETs (grays) can project
false images for an rv-er. Lyn Buchanon (a co-worker of Joe McMoneagle's) was supposed
to have "fried" a laptop computer by "influencing" a quantum event that escalated into a
disaster. It must be a lot easier said-than-done to remote-view something like Montauk or the
Philadelphia Experiment to check the truth. Else we wouldn't be having all these debates over
the accuracy and credibility of reputed whistle-blowers.
>
> I don't know how closely "intuitive communications" is to remote-viewing. See the claims
of former Elint Sgt. Dan Sherman and his role in "Project Preserve Destiny" at
http://www.stealthskater.com/Sherman.htm .
>
> Have you ever heard of "lucid dreaming"? It's the ability to influence your dreams anyway-you-want and -- in effect -- live out all your fantasies (noble or perverse) in a very
realistic dream world. A few companies sell gadgets that purport to help novices attain (or
578
recognize) the conditions to begin "lucidating". I may archive a couple of the more
interesting essays to my site in the near future. There is even a yGroup (possibly more)
dedicated to this phenomenon.
>
> PLEASE keep me posted on any further updates or thoughts on the 'Star Chamber'. I'm
really interested in that!
> Best Regards -> -- Mark
I read this e-mail and the last one. Sorry I have been unable to reply lately I've been trying to catch
up on some work on the FTA. And a new doc I'm writing on teleportation. I hope to reply over the
weekend.
All the best
Tom
P.S. It was only this afternoon I was thinking about writing a book on the FTA, time-travel, and
teleportation as a means to raise funds and pay-off loans. It's something I'm currently thinking over.
S-344. from Thomas Skeggs regarding writing a book about his Montauk-related research
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
Date: Sat, June 28, 2003 10:53 am
To: <kram@stealthskater.com>
Hello Mark
Like you said in your e-mail, the FTA and Star Chamber are totally different systems so I must keep
them separate. Yet some of the systems are compatible. I yhink I will look at what papers I have and
see what I can incorporate into a book. I am writing up a paper with a lot equations in it. But this paper
can be changed into a Chapter.
I'm also planning to get a second-hand laptop computer so I can set up shop anywhere and write
some whenever I get the chance.
I have been writing an e-mail. It's a bit long and relates to Montauk. I could edit it and incorporate
into a chapter on the Montauk. I have found some website with some excellent colour photos of
Montauk. I could seek permission to put them in the book.
Tom
S-345. from Thomas Skeggs regarding the Montauk Project and MK-ULTRA
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
Date: Sat, June 28, 2003 11:02 am
579
To: <kram@stealthskater.com>
Regarding the Montauk Project, it does look like Preston Nichols may have been more of a victim of
the Pandora Project than MK-ULTRA. The latter was a vast program which ran for many years. But
the Pandora Project appears to be experimenting with the effects of RF radiation on the human body and
to control the human body by electrical means.
I just cannot remember the chronology of the projects to see if it fits within the right time frame.
The Pandora Project involved the CIA, ARPA, the State department, the Navy and the Army. Other
projects include TUMS, MUTS, and Bazar. Mind-control research carried at Montauk may have been a
spin-off project which may still remain classified to this day.
I found 2 useful mind-control links: "The ESP of Espionage" by Tim Rifat published at Nexus
(http://www.nexusmagazine.com/ESPionage.html.) This site has some photos from TV docs on
mind-control. They contain some images of key players involved in mind-control research
(http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/tvlist.htm).
Dr Armen Victorian's book Mind Controller makes several references to electroportation or
synthetic teleportation. One project may have been carried out by the Office of the Chief of Naval
Research (OCNR), Arlington, Virginia, Project Code 441k708-04 'Electroportation:
Theory of Basic Mechanisms - Progress: the quantitive theory successfully describes
reversible electrical breakdown of a bilayer membrane due to large electrical pulse and
passive charging with the retention of the charge due to small pulse'. This description
seems more to do with chemistry and the OCNR also carried out extensive testing into the
effects of EM radiation on DNA.
I lost most of my notes in a virus attack last year. But I think SRI or SAIC also conducted research
into electroportation.
Some research I carried out was on the emission of photons. One Scientist (Dr. Fritz-Albert Popp)
suggested that the atoms which make up the human body emits photons. These photons may make up
biophysical field which Russians scientists claim surround all livings things. They also believe that
remote viewers can project this biophysical field to another location and collect information-remote
viewing.
Popp also discovered that people suffering from illness would emit more brighter photons where
healthy people would emit weak photons at constant rate. Popp believes the emission of photons from
the DNA are quantum coherent. British remote-viewer Tim Rifat believes that the DNA may act like
psychotronic batteries capable of storing up biophysical energy.
I believe that DNA can store vast amounts of energy in the form of biophotons due to the
superconducting-like properties of DNA. Ordinary people emit these biophotons at a constant rate. But
people with PSI abilities are capable of storing vast amounts of energy and then releasing at will to
remote-view or -influence objects at a distance. Or even teleport!
During my experiments, I discovered the best results occurred every 80 days. And I couldn't think
why.
580
Recently I discovered by re-reading the work by Popp, etc. that the emissions of biophotons follow a
certain biological rhythms at 7, 14, 32, 80 and 270 days. I generally now experience a window of
opportunity where RV and DMILS are greatly improved. This window appears to last for 7-14 days.
(The last window is active -- starting on the 20th June). The downside is that it's very difficult to
switch off and you can sense a great deal more of the World around. Sometimes it's difficult to focus
and concentrate for long periods.
The windows appear to tie in with the Spring & Autumn equinoxes and the Summer and Winter
solstices. There has been some recent articles in Nexus Magazine on how the human body is in sync
with the geo-electric and magnetic fields and how the HAARP project may disrupt these rhythms. Some
remote-viewers report they their ability to remote-view dramatically increased by using sync-toSchumann [Resonance] techniques.
In the book The Montauk Files, the author mentions the work of R.E Masters who researched the
work of Dr Raymond Wheeler who complied data on cycles or rhythms natural disasters and wars.
Some Russian research points to using electron excitation to boost the power of the biophysical field
by using Tesla coils, powerful magnetic fields, ionizers, crystals, or special ELF transmitters. The
damaging or influencing of electronic equipment and computers is quite easy. Russians scientists have
recorded an increase in ionization around PSI adapts and the objects they are influencing But recorded
little ionization in the space between the PSI adapts and the objects.
You know that computers or electrical circuits with IC chips are prone to damage by static
electricity. It does not take much effort for a PSI adapt to burn out circuits or computers. A serious
situation can develop in an alarm situation where a powerful PSI adapt can induce spontaneous
combustion within electrical equipment causing short circuits and fires to break out. This alarm
situation is the result of fear and anger when combined with a highly charged-up PSI adapt.
The RV data I collected does suggest a possible serious incident where sporadic fires broke out
around the base. In bricked areas (especially in the brick up areas), there is fire and flood damage. The
Montauk Project was not brought to end by a big black hairy monster. It appears an experiment got out
of control and fires broke out around the base. Actually the bunkers are an ideal location due to all the
steel used in their construction.
This leads to another book that I read which may shed some more light of the what was going on
Montauk.
It's called UFOs: Psychic Close Encounters by Albert Budden who examines a number of UFO and
abduction cases in Britain. Budden describes in his book various geophysical effects and global
electromagnetic pollution. One important relative to Montauk is that Budden discovered a possible link
that a high number of UFOs and abductions occur within electromagnetic hotspots and found some
cases where cases occur between 2-or-more transmitter masts.
He also believes that the geology and topology of the terrain plays a part. I disagree with his
findings that UFOs and aliens are just hallucinations. The connection with Montauk is that the interior
of the bunkers may have been a purposely-made EM hotspot. Where a hot spot existed between the
exterior omni-directional antenna and the below-ground Delta-T antenna. This is where the psychic sat
in the chair.
581
My view of the Delta-T antenna is that Preston got the dimensions wrong. A 300-ft antenna would
require a much large underground cavern to house and would have been a major civil engineering
project which would not have gone un-noticed. My belief is that it was much smaller and could have
been housed in one the bunker's now sealed up magazines. The magazine could have been expanded to
house it (explaining the odd colored rocks on the shore). Preston describes the Delta-T antenna being
surrounded by cables connected to a white noise generator. Within it were 2 Helmholtz coils. The
antenna being made of a ferrous material because he said it was magnetic. And that a "portal" would
open up inside the antenna.
One important feature overlooked may actually be the chamber which houses the Delta-T antenna.
This was in my 'Star Chamber' design. It used an internal chamber that I described as a Helmholtz
Resonator. These resonators have a resonance frequency which is proportional to their internal
dimensions. If you subject the interior to periodic oscillation say by using white noise generators or EM
radiation, the chamber will resonant at a specific frequency and produce standing waves which boost the
resonant frequency.
The actual idea for me comes from a very usual location. From ancient Egyptian in the form of the
Gaza pyramids. The internal chambers within the pyramids may act like solid-state psychotronic
amplifiers.
In a new branch of Archaeology known as "acoustic archaeology", researchers have found that many
chambers at prehistoric sites (like the pyramids and in British long barrows) act like Hemholtz
resonators. They also believe that some chambers resonant frequencies lay within the ELF band and
may affect the mind, inducing trance-like states or altered states of consciousness. (See Stone Age
Soundtracks by Paul Devereux -- also a new book is due out soon on Gaza pyramids acting as
psychotronic amplifier). I wrote an unpublished paper on this subject but it was lost following the virus
attack on my computer.
Another special feature of this type of technology may involve magnetic shielding. The vast bulk of
the Gaza pyramids actually alters and weakens the Earth's geomagnetic field inside the pyramids.
And according to Ha; Puthoff who conducted extensive research into remote-viewing, he found
remote-viewing improved when the Earth geomagnetic field was at its weakest. The Delta-T antenna
may have acted like a 3-D magnetic shield which blocked out the Earth's geomagnetic field.
The use of a white noise generator may have applied to produce stochastic resonance which is used
when a modulated signal is too weak to be heard or otherwise detected. Weak signals are covered by
background noise. Using stochastic resonance is where the background noise is added to the weak
signal to boost to detectable levels. So the chamber and Delta-T antenna may have been designed to
boost the ELF modulations produced by the exterior UHF transmitter by using stochastic resonance and
the resonant frequency (standing waves) of the chamber to boost the ELF modulations.
Also by housing the antenna outside, the EM radiation passes through a mass. The speed of the EM
waves actually slow down. The mass of the bunkers would have slowed the EM waves down by
considerable amount. My experiments with low-powered 433-MHz transmitters may cause electron
excitation resulting in the emission of photons. The psychic would have been exposed to several
megawatts of EM radiation. But located underground the surrounding environment would have been
emitting a lot of biophotons. Think of it as a giant size electronic orgone accumulator. Orgone and
biophysical energy (i.e., biophotons) are all one of the same form of energy. And orgone accumulators
consist of layers of steel, wood, or fiberglass.
582
The last note on Montauk is that chair is not the handiwork of aliens but more likely the CIA.
In my notes, I came across a reference to a chair capable of reading the thoughts of anyone who sat
in it. But sadly, details have been lost following the virus attack.
The summary: mind-control experiments occurred at Montauk and there may have been a serious
incident involving fires breaking out around the base. Time-travel may have been discovered here. But
your contact believes it was packed up and shipped to Plattsburgh. Workers on the base may have been
exposed to high levels of EM radiation and Biophotonic energy which could in theory affect their
memories and their minds.
Teleportation may be result of some complex quantum interactions occurring within the Delta-T
antenna. Like Larmor precession which effects the nuclei of atoms and causes them to line up with a
magnetic field. This may result in the formation of magnetic bridges to form connecting up 2 different
locations on two different space-time sheets when applied to Pitkanen's TGD theory.
I did feature a small section on Pitkanen's TGD theory on a paper I published on my old
starchamberproject.org website last December. But I have not yet had the time to read all of work and
to see how my theories relate to Pitkanen's.
I was planning to write another e-mail on some recent lucid dreams I have experienced recently.
Sometimes I experience more during a window of opportunity. Some of the lucid dreams include
information relating to Montauk. I think I should start writing it up as chapter for the book.
--Tom
S-346. from Thomas Skeggs regarding time-travel experiments in former missile silos
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
Date: Sat, June 28, 2003 7:39 pm
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Hello Mark,
Last week, I did a bit of RV work on Plattsburgh. I was disappointed that I could not find much
there relating to Montauk or time-travel.
But when I was remote-viewing the site, I saw a F-111 fighter-bomber take-off. I have just
completed a search on the Internet. FB-111 bombers were based at Plattsburgh. My attention kept
being drawn to a hanger where a forklift was unloading wooden crates. To me, it looked like a storage
area. Check out the plan of the base at http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/facility/plattsburgh.htm.
Some the equipment may have been stored here. Looking at another website, something really caught
my eye.
During 1961 and 1962, the physical appearance of the area surrounding Plattsburgh AFB underwent
changes as construction began on 12 "Atlas F" missile sites. The sites were built within a 50-mile radius
of the base and were completed in 1963 at an average cost of $3 million each. The missile silos were
built inside gigantic holes 174 feet deep and 54 feet wide into solid rock. Approximately 8,000 cubic
yards of concrete and tons of structural steel were used in each hole to create a blast-proof underground
583
silo, protected by massive overhead doors for the 81-foot missiles. A single underground blockhouse
containing launch consoles and personnel quarters was constructed at each site. This abstract was taken
from http://www.philippecolin.net/380thBW.html.
Some time-travel experiments may have been conducted in an abandoned missile silo somewhere in
the Plattsburgh area. The Atlas missiles were removed in 1965 and may have been replaced by
Minuteman missiles. But to conduct experiments, they would only require one silo. And security was
very strict around such missile sites.
I kept doing some RV work and searched the Net for any other useful material. RV data is not
always correct. But it can produce some useful pointers.
--Tom
S-347. from Thomas Skeggs regarding remote-viewing Plattsburgh AFB
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
Date: Mon, June 30, 2003 8:01 pm
To: kram@stealthskater.com
> Subject: you blew me away!
> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 21:16:29 -0400 (EDT)
>
> Hi Tom!
>
> You are rapidly becoming the most amazing fellow I've come across regarding all these
topics. The stuff regarding Nichols &amp; Montauk is so down-to-earth believable and
makes sense out of some of his claims. For as popular as the Montauk legends are, you could
write a book just on that alone! I'm frequently guilty of over-enthusiasm and speak when I
should keep quiet. I don't want to "steal any thunder" from your research efforts. Please tell
me what I can and cannot excerpt from your e-mails to pass on to others. I've been out-ofwork myself (corporate downsizing) and have accumulated bills from my now-defunct photo
studio. So I don't want to accidentally infringe on your (or anybody else's) efforts to possibly
pay off some debts.
>
> I obviously was wrong on the Plattsburgh thing. I'm also guilty of being a "sucker" for
things which sound good and I picked that off an message board post where a supposed exmilitary guy said to look at Plattsburgh rather than Montauk. For all I know, the agencies are
letting my site stay up because I'm a "useful fool" for inadvertently passing on dis-info (the
same attributes have been given to Linda Moulton Howe, Richard Boylan, and even the late
Major Donald Keyhoe).
>
> There is this 'Bob King' guy who lives in New Zealand and claims to have been told the
true nature of the P-X during WWII.
You can see Bob's e-mails to me at
http://www.stealthskater.com/Email_Diary.htm.
>
> Until you get an address (or use a friend's), if you want to see UNITEL's book let me know
and I can post it in sections at my site. From there, you can download it. That method will
work for all other things essays in the meantime.
584
>
> I've only had Internet access since 2000. I was primarily an IBM 360/370 mainframe
programmer for most of my career. When I got laid-off, I was doing contract work but they
didn't allow contractors Internet access. Finally I was able to save up enough money to
purchase a home PC in December '99. Then slowly, I've been teaching myself the skills to
become Internet-savvy. I wasn't expecting all the mis- and dis-info, however. I guess I'm too
trusting a person.
>
> I'll read your Montauk e-mail more in length later. I just wanted to express my amazement
and wonderment at your accumulated information/knowledge/deductions.
>
> Have a good weekend!
>-- Mark
Hello Mark,
Thanks for the last e-mail. One problem that came to light last night [29th June 2003] when
checking maps of the U.S. You stated in your e-mail, that time-travel experiments may have been
conducted at Plattsburgh AFB. So I remote-viewed Plattsburgh AFB at that time period and saw
wooden crates being unloading and a F-111 bomber take-off.
That post maybe half true. Equipment may have been shipped to Plattsburgh following the closure
of Montauk in 1981. The equipment may have been held there until a new home could be found to
house it. A missile silo would be an excellent choice to conduct any time travel-like e.g., teleportation)
experiments.
A list of missile silo coordinates in the U.S. can be found at:
http://www.siloworld.com/COORDINATES/LOCAL.htm. At this website is virtual tour of a Atlas
missile silo: http://www.atlasicbm.com/tour.html.
I have saved this best bit for last. Recently since the June 20, I have been experiencing some
disturbing dreams. I find myself as someone else in a church who is very distressed and full of fear,
anger, and confusion. This person appears to be a "troubled" teenager who is approached by a priest
who tries to discover the cause of the teenager‘s pain and distress.
The teenager could not explain nor understand the way he felt. He only wanted to known the cause
of why he felt so sad and why he was hurting so much. The priest told the teenager: “To answer your
question, one must seek the truth. The truth is not a unique concept which resides with the minds of
man. The truth is all around us. To seek the truth, one must live the truth“.
This is all I can recall from memory, I have written down, and quite painful for me to recall all. You
are asking yourself what has a troubled teenager, a church, and priest has to do with Montauk? Such
dreams are archetypal. They are a product of the subconscious mind.
When we dream, we can tap into the Transpsychic realm (i.e., the dwelling place of the Collective
Unconsciousness). Searching the Net last night, my dream was broken. The church, the priest, and the
teenager who seeks the truth -- it’s all to do with a place called Rome. Not the Rome in Italy but the
Rome Air Development Center (also known as Air Force Research Laboratory). This is where SAGE
radar was developed.
The Rome Air Development Center is located at Griffiss AFB and lies about 100-150 miles
Southwest of Plattsburgh AFB. Also Southwest of Plattsburgh is Hancock Field which housed a SAGE
585
Radar site. It's right next to Syracuse International Airport. Syracuse was the home for the 21 st North
American Aerospace Defense Command. In 1983, the base was due to begin closure where in 1984 a
caretaker force would take over. The SAGE network was been closed down in 1983-84 across the
whole Country as it was being replaced by a more up-to-date system.
Also what caught my eye: Syracuse housed a recruiting squadron for the USAF which cover the
entire New York County. Close to Rome Center are the Universities of Cornell and Rochester. I know
that Rochester conducted some tests involving drugs as part of MK-ULTRA project in the 1960s.
(Looking at a map of SAGE sites, there are 1-or-2 unlisted SAGE sites along the Canadian border. You
never know … a SAGE site may lie within close range of a missile silo - say a mile or so.) Check out
this page at the official Rome Air Development Center website: http://www.if.afrl.af.mil/History/rlbrief-history.html.
This area around Plattsburgh and Rome seems to open up whole new line of research possibilities
regarding mind-control and other related experiments. What about EDOM and RHIC technologies
which were conducted just across the border in Canada under the close supervision of Dr Solandt (who
was chairman of the Canadian Defence Research Board)?.
Dr Solandt was the boss of Wilbert Smith who ran "Project Magnet" (i.e., UFO research) and I think
Project Second Storey too. RHIC was developed by a Spanish scientist who moved to Yale. Snd some
writers believed RHIC was apart of MK-ULTRA or Pandora. EDOM could remove memories can
create the effect of "missing time".
Thinking about your last e-mail, I find the actual task of writing a complete book quite daunting.
Why not compile a book with articles written by different writers on a range of subjects? I could rewrite these e-mails into one article on the Montauk Project. And the Star Chamber and other writers
could produce other articles. And you act as editor.
Well, must go now
--Tom
S-348. from Thomas Skeggs regarding "shielding" remote-viewing
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
Date: Thu, July 3, 2003 6:07 pm
To: kram@stealthskater.com
> Subject: make a plan
> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 06:54:55 -0400 (EDT)
>
> Hi Tom ->
> Your revelations only astound me more.
>
> One question that has been on my mind for awhile is what advantages does the Star Chamber offer
over remote-viewing? In theory, I thought a seasoned RVer could go anywhere in the Universe at
any time. There appears to be reliability problems with what he is "viewing", however. Maybe one
of Tegmark's "alternate universes" or a past quantum history (Hawking). Is the Star Chamber
586
intended for the "normal" person without RV capabilities? Can it make the experience more
"credible" as far as reporting accuracy goes?
>
> A guy named 'Bob Dratch' claims to also have been involved in the Montauk Project as an
engineer. He was marketing something called a "God Box" which seems to have been a lucid dream
maker. I still think "traveling" via consciousness-engineering is the ultimate way to go. But there
could be inherent dangers in that it could be exploited as the ultimate "drug" (e.g., see the movie
"Brainstorm").
>
> The one problem that sticks out with collecting articles by other authors to assemble into one book
is you're going to have to reimburse them for their contribution. If you do all the observing yourself,
then you rightfully keep all the rewards. It sounds like it might be physically taxing to do some of
this. After such an experience, can you remember all of the details? Do you ever use a "monitor" to
guide you or record your observations?
>
> When I first thought about you writing a book, it was in reference to the Star Chamber or FTA.
But your RV expertise has opened up an entirely new front. Books could be written just on one
subject as viewed by you. You might be able to get away with incorporating the findings of others
by summarizing their essays and appropriately referencing them (as opposed to quoting them
verbatim). But that would take a lot of research, viewing for a single subject, especially one as
complicated as Montauk or UFOs. You could always make essays available as downloadable "ebooks" for a fee. That would save you the hassles of dealing with a publisher and surrendering a lot
of your profits. But you need a competent programmer to design a "Pay-Pal" website. And I don't
have those skills. Dan Sherman ended up buying a small publishing company with his military
severance pay to publish his book on "Project Preserve Destiny" and "intuitive communications"
(perhaps a cousin to remote-viewing). But you may be like me and most others who are not in such
enviable situations.
>
> Sooner-or-later someone will ask why can't RV -- in the hands of a capable and disciplined user -reveal all pertinent secrets about something. With all the RVers out there, legends such as Roswell
and Bentwaters should have be explained or dismissed by now. Furthermore, why can't an RVer
provide answers as to what happened to someone's insurance policy or help locate missing children?
McMoneagle said that his RV experiences tended to be more accurate involving places housing
"high energy" (like atomic reactors). Can RVing be deliberate deceived or manipulated by a hostile
power (e.g., the Russians or even ETs)? Are there any real-life dangers to RVing (e.g., you seem
unwilling to view certain areas ... why? what can happen?)
>
> It sounds to me as if an RVer can pick up bits-and-pieces of "snapshots" of something. But it
would take too MANY sessions to view an entire scenario like Montauk. And that's assuming each
one is 100% "correct". Ergo incorporate other sources like books and web resources. Right or
wrong?
>
> But I'll help you any way that you see fit. Perhaps if you establish goals and work backwards from
them, you can better zoom-in on the scope of your book-writing efforts. It's easy to get
overwhelmed by letting your ambitions get carried away. Then you end up shooting yourself in the
foot by making something too grandiose and only doing a halfway-job on some of the topics (which
is what happened in UNITEL's book).
>
> Keep me informed ...
> -- Mark
587
Hello Mark
The request for info on the use of Faraday cages on remote viewing-appears mixed. Tim Rifat
claimed to have built one and it improved his remote-viewing. One American remote-viewer said it did
not and, I think, reduced his ability. Robert Monroe conducted an experiment where he built a Faraday
cage and connected up to a 50kv generator. He then sat in it and tried to "astral travel" as he called it.
He found the experience quite unsettling. He stated that he may have discovered a “ghost-catcher”.
Monroe also developed the Controlled Holistic Environmental Chamber (CHEC) Unit. The CHEC
was a soundproof, vibration proof Faraday cage-like unit used at the Monroe Institute. The remoteviewer would sit inside the unit and have various hemi-sync sounds pumped into it. This would help the
remote-viewer enter into an altered state of consciousness. Sounds very much like the "God Box".
I have read that some installations use pairs of Tesla coils tuned 180 degrees out-of-phase with each
other. It's claimed to jam or prevent remote-viewers gaining access to the installations. The 'Star
Chamber' does indeed act like a Faraday Cage. But my original designed (stated in the paper Tempus
Codex) tries to use the Casimir Effect. All I did with the concept was to take 2 metal plates and bend
them into a 3-D shape capable of completely shielding the interior from the outside.
My first idea was to subject the interior to EM radiation by using 2 antennas to generate interfere. In
the same way you produce a hologram. But because the operator is completely cut off from the exterior,
this hologram can be projected to a distance location.
Since then, I made some modifications. In fact, I carried some tests in March 2002. I came up with
an idea to see if I could transmit a 3-D biophysical hologram of myself to a distance location. In
remote-viewing, you simply project you "biophysical field" to another location. It's invisible to other
people. I tried to make mine tangible and visible to other people at a distance location.
It took me months to work out that the laser treatment may have played a key role because laser light
is quantum coherent. And so are biophotons. The photons from the laser light may have stored within
my DNA which acts like a superconductor. When I applied directed attention, this may have produced a
result. But the results are somewhat confusing and I now put the experience down to "lucid dreaming".
This is going to sound real odd but what I recall is dream-like. I visited a building several times.
The last time, this woman gave some small device to hold. This device then gave me an electric shock.
This woman then told me this is real and that I’m upsetting people and I must not return. I complained.
And the boss who was in the room said to me that I was unsettling his staff.
I think what I experienced was a very realistic lucid dream and I don't take this event too seriously.
In March 2002, I also carried out some transbilocation test in California. In 2001 when I first set up
the 433 MHz transmitter, I made the mistake that I had teleported to a location north of Los Angeles. In
March 2002m I worked it may have been transbilocation instead. Some on the Internet believed that I
was from Los Angeles. But I have never been there by conventional means.
In August 2002, I switched my attention to the New York area following a request to seek out Dr. D.
Anderson of the Time Travel Research Center. My RV logs regarding my RV excursions have either
been lost or destroyed. My recent logs are incomplete. Other remote-viewers would be appalled at my
record keeping. So if I am going to use RV data, I must keep accurate record and publish it as an
appendix in my future book.
588
You made a valid point about the accuracy of RV data. Some may claim if remote-viewing is that
good, then why can’t they track down Bin Laden? Senior officers won’t commit troops to engage in a
military attack based on the intelligence gathered by some nutty dreamers who believe that can locate
his point. Military commanders appear to be skeptical of remote-viewing. They think the info is
gathered by New Age hippies grazing into a crystal ball.
But the actual procedures taught by companies like PSI Tech are quite technical. One problem with
remote-viewing is what you see is like a burst of images followed by a stream of shorter images. It's
like watching a movie trailer. There is little continuity or logical sequence of events. (Have you seen
the movie "Minority Report" when Anderson posts the images on the glass screen?). What I get are
short segments of film-like images -- some with sound and some without. And usually it's difficult to
find out where you are because of the short segments.
When you are looking for missing children, the remote-viewer is blind to the location. They may
pick up the images of a missing child (say within a house). But sometimes it's difficult to pin-point their
position. Especially if you don’t know the area. They need to be close to a landmark which stands out
so you can pin-point position with accuracy.
I may have to cut down on the number of e-mails I send you because I wish to focus my efforts on
carrying out research into my book. But I will keep in torch and up-to-date. The book is progressing
steadily.
You asked permission to send copies of my e-mails to after people. You can do this. I just don't like
the idea of posting them on the various forum-like boards for now because I have noticed a few errors
which need correcting. Or the critics will rip the messages to bits with sarcastic comments.
The e-book idea sounds good. I could seek out a publisher who specializes in New Age sciencerelated books. You could proof read the draft and I could write extracts for your website.
All the best.
Tom
<= previous E-mails 250-299
next E-mails 350-399 =>
if on the Internet, press <BACK> on your browser to return
to the previous page (or go to www.stealthskater.com)
else if accessing these files from the CD in a MS-Word session, simply <CLOSE>
this file's window-session; the previous window-session should still remain 'active'
589