PRE-APPRAISAL SHEET
Project ID and Title:
__________________________________________________
Project Classification:
__________________________________________________
VAP Goal/Programme Area: __________________________________________________
Date:
__________________________________________________
Appraiser:
SECTION 1
A. Thrust:
B. Types of
development
intervention
C. Stage
D. Previous
Project(s)
E. Regionality
SECTION 2
F. Objective
A:_______________________________
B:_______________________________
C:_______________________________
a)
b)
c)
a)
b)
c)
THRUST, STAGE & REGIONALITY
Regionalism
Integration
Competitiveness
Policy initiatives
Establishment of institutional mechanisms
Human capacity building
1. Confidence building
(exchanging experiences and best practices)
2. Harmonization (agreeing to work in a multisystem environment)
3. Special assistance
(direct support, filing the development gaps)
4. Joint efforts (implementing regional activities)
5. Regional integration and expansion
(as an entity, expand activities)
a) Appropriate sequence of stages has been
passed
b) Sufficiently/Non-sufficiently supportive
a) The intervention can only be done regionally
b) The intervention is more effective to be
carried out collectively
c) The intervention benefits all Member
Countries
ASSESSMENT
Recommended
Funding
Please determine the presence
of typical corresponding
Objective, Outputs, Activities,
and apply scoring in Section 2.
(In case of mixed stages, please
mark the most dominant stage )
Score (10%)
A B C (WA)
Score (10%)
B C A (WA)
PROJECT DESIGN
How does the objective correspond to the Stage?
Strength:
SCORE
Weight (15%)
C A B (WA)
Weakness:
Proposed Revision:
G. Outputs
Will the critical outputs ensure the attainment of the objective?
Strength:
Weight (15%)
A B C (WA)
1/2
Weakness:
Proposed Revision:
H. Activities
Will the activities produce the above critical outputs?
Weight (15%)
B C A (WA)
Strength:
Weakness:
Proposed Revision:
I. Inputs
Are the proposed inputs sufficient to achieve the optimum
outputs?
Strength:
Weight (15%)
C A B (WA)
Weakness:
Proposed Revision:
J. Management
and
Implementation
Arrangement
Are the management and implementation arrangement realistically
set?
Weight (10%)
A B C (WA)
Strength:
Weakness:
Proposed Revision:
K. Success
Criteria
(qualitative
and/or
quantitative
measures of
the
achievement of
the output(s)
should be
mentioned)
Are the success criteria properly identified?
Weight (10%)
B C A (WA)
Strength:
Weakness:
Proposed Revision:
TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE:
DESCRIPTION:
Recommendation Option
Pass
Pass with revision
Reformulate
Fail
Threshold Range
>80
70-80
>50 - <70
<=50
2/2