Contents Page Preface 3 Programme Introduction and Programme Design 4 Teaching Strategies 5 Contents of the Resource Package 6 Student Selection, Behavioral Characteristic of Students with High Potential in Sciences 7 Lesson 1 : Nature of Science 8 Lesson 2 : Causal Inference-Mill’s Method in Causal Reasoning 27 Lesson 3 : Testing a Hypothesis 59 Lesson 4 : Experimental Designs 82 Lesson 5 : Double-blind Design in Randomised Experimental Design 108 Lesson 6 : Critical Thinking in Engineering Process 130 Lesson 7 : Arguments in Science 146 Lesson 8 : Analogies in Science 158 Lesson 9 : Pseudoscience 184 Programme Evaluation 202 Student Questionnaire 203 Statistics of Student Questionnaire 204 Extract from Students’ Questionnaires 205 Links of the Interview Videos 206 Behavioral Checklist of Student with High Potential in Sciences 207 References & Recommended Book List 211 Preface It has been my great honour to serve as a consultant for the programme “Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context” and I applaud the achievement of the programme team in developing this resource package for teaching gifted students the methods of science. In the case of language learning, it is common that one could be a native speaker of a language without direct knowledge of many of its grammatical rules. Similarly, in science education, one could also learn how to practice science without receiving direct instruction on the underlying methods used in various scientific activities. Although many skills, including scientific reasoning, could be learned in a case-by-case (bottom-up) manner by following typical examples, this teaching method has many limitations, including the difficulty to transfer skills that are learned in one domain to another. In science education, these limitations could be overcome by the supplement of the top-down approach in which the underlying rules and principles of scientific reasoning are identified and made explicit to students in the learning process. This approach is followed in this resource package. Students may find the top-down approach difficult to follow because abstraction and generalization are required in understanding the rules and principles of scientific reasoning. This resource package has made very good use of well-chosen historical and daily life examples to illustrate various methods of science. It greatly reduces the level of difficulty in learning the subject, and so I believe that the package is a very useful and effective toolkit for teaching scientific methods. Besides focusing on the application of various scientific methods, the package also puts great emphasis on developing students’ awareness of their limitations. This can enhance their ability to think critically in scientific investigation. This ability is essential for the advancement of science because many great scientific discoveries and invention were results of critical but not mechanical applications of scientific methods. This package has therefore adopted a very sound approach that can enhance students’ ability to push the frontier of scientific knowledge forward. Dr Chan Ho Mun Associate Professor of Philosophy Department of Public and Social Administration City University of Hong Kong ( This resource package can be downloaded from http://resources.edb. gov.hk/gifted/Learning_&_Teaching_ResourcesII/ ) P2 P3 Programme Introduction Teaching Strategies The theme of this science pull-out programme is “Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context”. It aims to enhance students’ thinking skills through the learning of some science related topics. The designed activities provide junior secondary students opportunities to develop their critical thinking, problem-solving as well as decision making skills, which are deemed to be very important elements of an enrichment programme for the gifted students. Students are familiar with some of the topic contents related to scientific investigation. Unfamiliar topics such as analogy and pseudoscience are also included in the programme to provide challenges to the students. Furthermore, the learning content of such topics relates real life examples to the study, which may motivate the students to learn better. According to Gallagher(1985) the learning content, learning process and the learning environment of the basic curriculum need to be modified to match the characteristics and the needs of the gifted. Another expert in gifted education, VanTassel-Baska (1988) advocated that a gifted curriculum should attend to the content mastery and the learning process. Hence, gifted students should be taught with advanced content, higher order thinking and problem-solving skills. The teacher should act as a facilitator to motivate students to learn actively. The teacher may use effective questioning technique to promote thinking in science context. Open questions are useful in stimulating higher level thinking. Students need to be encouraged to justify their ideas, evaluate the reasoning of a claim and a conclusion. The teacher may use real life example to enhance problem-solving and decision making skills of students. Furthermore, the teacher should allow the students to have choice in doing the class work or assignment and note the learning styles of different gifted students. Finally but not the least, the teacher should maintain a warm classroom atmosphere so as to encourage more teacher-student as well as student-student interaction which is benefical to deep learning. Programme Design Many academics such as Joyce VanTassel-Baska advocated that key components of a science curriculum for the gifted students should 1. develop an understanding of scientific concepts; 2. develop scientific inquiry skills in collaborative settings; 3. let them learn significant content in science areas; 4. develop interdisciplinary connections; 5. develop investigations of real problems and 6. develop scientific habits of mind. In addition to the conceptual learning outcomes, thinking skills should also be introduced to gifted students. In this connection the programme “Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context” is thus designed to include many activities to provide chance for the students to enhance their problem solving, critical thinking and decision making skills. Students are required to test their hypotheses, analyze the data, evaluate the evidence and then draw conclusions. They also learn advanced science concepts and are required to solve interdisciplinary problems in science and statistics (double-blind design). P4 P5 Contents of the Resource Package Author Gifted Education Section, Curriculum Development Institute, Education Bureau Target Students S1-S2 Teaching mode Pull-out enrichment programme KLA Science Lessons 9 lessons (90 minutes each except Lesson 5 (180 min.)) Lesson 1: Nature of Science Lesson 2: Causal Inference-Mill’s Method in Causal Reasoning Lesson 3: Testing a Hypothesis Lesson 4: Experimental Designs Lesson 5: Double-blind Design in Randomised Experimental Design Lesson 6: Critical Thinking in Engineering Process Lesson 7: Arguments in Science Lesson 8: Analogies in Science Lesson 9: Pseudoscience Acknowledgments Pilot schools (2006-07) St. Paul’s Co-educational College (English version) Ms. Lau Oi Ha & Ms. Wong Pui Lan HKMLC Queen Maud Secondary School (Chinese version) Ms. Lo Sin Kei & Mr. Wong Ting Ho Mr. Kevin K.L. So (Engineer) (Contributing professional advice on Lesson 6) Fukien Secondary School (Chinese version) Mr. Chau Kwok Leung Dr. Chan Ho Mun (Programme Consultant)(Associate Professor of Philosophy, Department of Public and Social Administration, City Unversity of Hong Kong) P6 Student Selection Teachers are advised to use multiple methods channels such as classroom observation, behavioral checklist, parent/peer group/self recommendation, students’ products and assignments, awards in local and/or international science competitions to select students with high potential in science to take part in the school-based enrichment programme. A single test/indentification tool is not reliable in the indentfication of a scientifically gifted student. Behavioral Characteristics of Students with High Potential in Sciences (a) Persistent in learning science, high concentration, hard working and motivated; (b) Interested in science books and science related television programmes; (c) Enjoys solving problems in sciences; (d) Organises data or analyses an observed phenomenon to discover patterns or relationships; (e) Good at observing, exploring, questioning, investigating things in detail; (f) Understands scientific methods, able to formulate hypotheses and conduct experiments carefully; (g) Skillful in using laboratory equipments, able to improve on experiments; (h) Demonstrates creativity in invention and/or experimental designs; (i) Demonstrates task commitment in science projects(sticking with investigations in spite of difficulties or problems). P7 Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities Lesson 1 Nature of Science Level of Students: S.1-S.2 Suggested Lesson Time: 90 min. Learning Objectives: Students will: gain an understanding of the Nature of Science; be able to use induction in science reasoning. Materials for each group: Activity 1 Coloured tokens (red, yellow, blue, green, white) Opaque plastic bags for holding the tokens Activity 2 Red packets Ten-dollar bank notes Prior knowledge of students: Students should learn the basic scientific investigation method in S.1. The teacher can ask a few simple questions about scientific investigation and the nature of science to have a general idea of students’ knowledge on these topics. Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities: Lesson 1 Activity 1 (A game to model the nature of science) Time allocation Activity 2 (Red Packets Activity) 15 min 90 min. 35 min. Remarks The focus of Activity 1 is to let students experience what scientists do in scientific research and hence broaden students’ knowledge on the nature of science. The activity models the scientific process, including putting forward a hypothesis, carrying out experiments and getting results to see whether the data supports or does not support the hypothesis. The focus of Activity 2 is to motivate students to think about prediction based on induction (statistical induction); The teacher may ask students to comment on the use of this method in science. Activity 3, 4 and 5 40 min Activity 3 shows the students the structure of a logical argument (premise(s) and conclusion). Activity 4 & 5 are exercises on using induction in science reasoning. P8 P9 PowerPoint What is science? L e s s on 1 Nature of Science Activity 1: Material: coloured tokens, opaque plastic bags What do you know about scientific method? What are the steps involved in scientific investigation? Materials: Red packets & Ten-dollar bank notes Instruction: You are given some red packets. Each of you will take turns to open a red packet and then you are required to tell your classmates what is inside the red packet. Activity 1: Activity 2: Instruction: The class is divided into groups of 5 students. In each group 3 students would act as the team players while 2 students will act as observers, observer A and B. All the observer As and Bs will go outside the classroom when the teacher explains to the team players the rules of the game. Then all the observers will come back to the classroom and observe the team players to play the game. After 1 minute, the observers will be allowed to play the game. If the observers play wrongly, team players can only say the word “wrong” but they are not allowed to give further hints. Activity 1: The observers need to record their observations and hypotheses about the rules of the game. The time limit for the game with the participation of the observers is 2 minutes. Then the observers are required to present the rules of the game. Activity 1: What are your hypotheses? Do your data support your hypotheses? P 10 The focus on doing Activity 1 is to let you experience what scientists do in scientific research and hence broaden your knowledge on the nature of science. The activity models the scientific process, including putting forward a hypothesis, carrying out experiments and getting results to see whether the data supports or does not support the hypothesis. Activity 2: Activity 2: Do any of your red packets contain money? Predict the possibility that next red packet would contain money and explain your prediction. Induction The focus of Activity 2 is to stimulate you to think about prediction based on induction (statistical induction); Comment on the use of induction in science. Induction is the process of reasoning from particular facts or ideas to a general rule or law. In induction, scientists use separate observations to arrive at general principles. Activity 3 Activity 3 Q3.1. What is the colour of swans? __________________________________ Q3.2. Do you have any comments on the following arguments? __________________________________ P 11 All the swans in France are observed as white. All the swans in Germany are also observed as white. Then, all swans in the world are white in colour. Activity 3 Activity 3 Suggested Solution A =B C =B X (including A & C) =B In fact, the above statements are examples of logical statements. Try to present the above statements in Mathematical terms. Activity 4 Activity 3 Activity 3 The Structure of a Logical Argument involves a premise/premises and a conclusion. Arguments all follow a certain basic structure. They begin with one or more premises. Premises are facts and these facts are used as the starting point of an argument. Then a principle of logic is applied in order to come to a conclusion. Please write logical statements about the colour of swans: Activity 4 Activity 4 Dropping from a certain height above the ground, a ping pong ball bounces back to smaller heights and then finally stops bouncing. Dropping from a certain height above the ground a basket ball bounces back to smaller heights and then finally stops bouncing. Dropping from a certain height above the ground a football bounced back to smaller heights and then finally stops bouncing. Dropping from a certain height above the ground a tennis ball bounces back to smaller heights and then finally stops bouncing. Dropping from a certain height above the ground, all balls with properties of balls bounce back to smaller heights and then finally stop bouncing. All the swans in France are observed as white. All the swans in Germany are also observed as white. Then, all swans in the world are white in colour. Activity 5 (True or False) Remarks: The conclusion drawn by the method of “Induction by examples” may or may not be true. Once there is an exception, the conclusion can be overthrown. Using the example of the white swans Premise1: A (In France all the swans are observed as white) =B (All the swans are observed as white.) Premise2: C (In Germany all the swans are observed as white) =B (All the swans are observed as white) Activity 4 Logical connection-Hence Conclusion: X (including A & C) = B In the world (including France and Germany) all the swans are observed as white = All the swans are observed as white When a ping-pong ball, a basket ball, a football, a tennis ball are dropped from a certain height above the ground, they would fall on the ground, bounce back and finally stay on the ground. Try to write down some logical statements about the above phenomena. P 12 Activity 5 Your conclusion is based on some observations and experiments. Q4.1. Are the results of your experiments consistent without contradiction? ______________________________________________________ Q4.2. Suppose you are given a ball made of a certain material, X and required to carry out the same experiment as above, how would you comment on your previous conclusion if you got a contradictory result later? ______________________________________________________ ______________________ All living things are composed of basic units called cells. ( ) All black parents will give birth to black babies.( ) All jelly fish (more than 10,000 species in the sea) are toxic to humans.( ) All matters are made of particles called atoms. ( ) All headaches can be relieved by taking panadol. ( ) P 13 All swans are white. ( ) All plants possess chlorophyll. ( ) All fishes breathe with gills. ( ) All newborn mammals feed on mothers’ milk.( ) All snakes reproduce by laying eggs.( ) All swans are white. (F) All plants possess chlorophyll. (F) All fishes breathe with gills. (F) All newborn mammals feed on mothers’ milk. (T) All snakes reproduce by laying eggs. (F) All living things are composed of basic units called cells. (T) All black parents will give birth to black babies. (F) All jelly fish (more than 10,000 species in the sea) are toxic to humans. (F) All matters are made of particles called atoms. (T) All headaches can be relieved by taking panadol. (F) Teachers’ Reference Q5.1. Can you think of some other ways to enhance the validity of the conclusion drawn by the method “induction by examples”? ___________________________________ Suggested Solution: increase the number of targets during observations increase the range of targets a positive attitude towards contradictory examples Lesson 1 Nature of Science Learning Objectives Students will gain an understanding of the nature of science and scientific method; be able to use induction in science reasoning. Activity 1: A game to model the nature of science Material: coloured tokens Q5.2. What is the value of drawing conclusion by induction by examples? __________________________________ __________________________________ Suggested Solution: It is impossible to investigate all cases or examples to establish a scientific relationship / theory / principle. One of the advantages of using the method of induction by examples is that it is more practicable as long as the sampling method is appropriate. The law of conservation of energy in Physics is established by using the method of induction by examples. The class is divided into groups of 5 students. In each group, 3 students act as the team players while 2 students act as observers, observer A and B. All the observer As and Bs go outside the classroom when the teacher is explaining to the team players the rules of the game. Then all the observers come back to the classroom and observe the team players to play the game. After 1 minute the observers will be allowed to play the game. If the observers play wrongly, team players can only say the word “wrong” but they are not allowed to give further hints. The observers need to record down their observations and hypotheses. The time limit for the game with the observers is 2 minutes. Then the observers are required to present the rules of the game. The teacher may consider requesting observer As and Bs to do two different tasks, task 1 and task 2. Task 1: Guess the rules of the game (a more open guess). Task 2: Guess the rules of the game (Hints: guess the value sequence of the tokens, i.e. which token is most expensive, which one is the second expensive, etc.) Task 1 and 2 may be written in a word card. Observer As and Bs may not know the task of others. Rules of the game: Red, yellow, blue, green and white tokens are put inside an opaque plastic bag. Players take turns to pick out one token each time at random (without seeing the tokens from the bag) and then put the token on the table. When a more expensive token is newly picked out of the bag and put on the table, team players need to touch the pile of tokens. When a less expensive token is picked out of the bag, there is no need to touch the pile of tokens. When a token taken out of the bag has the same value as the preceding one, there is no need to touch the pile of tokens. P 14 P 15 Remarks: Activity 3: Observer As and Bs experience what scientists do in scientific research. First, they observe how the team players play the game and have their own hypothesis. They then play with the team players according to their own hypothesis (i.e. carry out experiments) and get feedback from the team players (get result). If they can play the game according to the rule, they are allowed to play the game continuously. Hence, the hypothesis is supported. Q3.1. What is the colour of swans? _____________________________________________________________________________ Activity 2: Students are given some red packets (only one red packet contains a 10-dollar bank note). Each of them needs to open the red packets one by one and tell their classmates what is inside the red packet. Ask students to predict the possibility that next red packet would contain lucky money after one student opens the red packet with a 10-dollar bank note. Q3.2. Do you have any comments on the following argument? All the swans in France are observed as white. All the swans in Germany are also observed as white. All the swans in Rome are also observed as white. Then, all swans in the world are white in colour. _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ In fact, the above statements are examples of logical statements. _____________________________________________________________________________ Try to present the above statements in Mathematical terms. Suggested Solution A=B C=B X (including A & C) = B _____________________________________________________________________________ The Structure of a Logical Argument involves a premise/premises and a conclusion. Remarks: Some students may say the chance is 50/50. Some may say it is most probably that the next red packet is empty. Others may say no one knows. The purpose of this activity is to motivate students to think about the use of generalisation in drawing a conclusion. The teacher may then discuss with the students the use of induction in science. The term statistical induction (activity 2) may also be mentioned. Arguments all follow a certain basic structure. They begin with one or more premises. Premises are facts and these facts are used as the starting point of an argument. Then a principle of logic is applied in order to come to a conclusion. What are your comments on predicting whether or not the next red packet would contain money? Induction is a process of reasoning from particular facts or ideas to a general rule or law. In induction scientists use separate observations to arrive at general principles. Please write down the logical statements about the colour of swans. Using the example of the white swans Premise1: A (In France all the swans are observed as white)=B (All the swans are observed as white.) Premise2: C (In Germany all the swans are observed as white)=B (All the swans are observed as white) Logical connection-Hence Conclusion: X (including A & C) = B In the world (including France and Germany) all the swans are observed as white = All the swans are observed as white P 16 P 17 Activity 4 When a ping-pong ball, a basket ball, a football, a tennis ball are dropped from a certain height above the ground, they fall on the ground, bounce back and finally stay on the ground. Try to write down some logical statements about the above phenomena. Dropping from a certain height above the ground, a ping pong ball bounces back to smaller heights and then finally stops bouncing. Dropping from a certain height above the ground, a basket ball bounces back to smaller heights and then finally stops bouncing. Dropping from a certain height above the ground, a football bounces back to smaller heights and then finally stops bouncing. Dropping from a certain height above the ground, a tennis ball bounces back to smaller heights and then finally stops bouncing. Dropping from a certain height above the ground, all balls with properties of balls bounce back to smaller heights and then finally stop bouncing. Your conclusion (logical statements) is based on some observations and experiments. Q4.1. Are the results of your experiments consistent without contradiction if you carry out the above experiments? ______________________________________________________________________________ Q4.2. Suppose that you are given a ball made of a certain material, X and required to carry out the same experiment as above, how would you comment on your previous conclusion if you get contradictory results later? ______________________________________________________________________________ Q5.1. Can you think of ways to enhance the validity of the conclusion drawn by the method “induction by examples”? ______________________________________________________________________________ Suggested Solution: a. Increase the number of targets during observation b. Increase the range of targets c. A positive attitude towards contradictory examples Q5.2. What is the value of drawing conclusion by induction by examples? Suggested Solution: It is impossible to investigate all cases or examples to establish a scientific relationship / theory / principle. One of the advantages of using the method of induction by examples is that it is more practicable as long as the sampling method is appropriate. The law of conservation of energy in Physics is established by using the method of induction by examples. Remarks: The conclusion drawn by the method of “induction by examples” may or may not be true. Once there is an exception, the conclusion can be overthrown. Activity 5 (True or False) Please put the correct answer (T=true; F=false) in the following brackets: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. All swans are white. All plants possess chlorophyll. All fishes breathe with gills. All newborn mammals feed on mothers’ milk. All snakes reproduce by laying eggs. All living things are composed of basic units called cells. All black parents will give birth to black babies. All jelly fish (more than 10,000 species in the sea) are toxic to humans. All matters are made of particles called atoms. All headaches can be relieved by taking panadol. P 18 ( F ( F ( F ( T ( F ( T ( F ( F ( T ( F ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) P 19 Further Reference on Activity 5 Item 1. All swans are white A Dutch explorer, Willem de Vlamingh, first reported to the world that he saw a black swan in Australia in 1697. Since then, throughout the world, seven species of swans have been identified. There are only two that are not pure white, the South American Black-necked Swan and the Australian Black Swan. Nowadays, Black Swans are common and numerous in Australia. Reference on Scientific Method The set of procedures by which scientists study the world is known as the scientific method. Scientific Method usually consists of: Observation Item 3. All fishes breathe with gills. Lung fish is an obligate air breather, possessing a swim bladder with alveolar tissue that serves as a rudimentary lung. Scientists use their senses (scientists concern with what they see, hear, feel, taste and smell) to study the world. They usually use tools (instruments) to extend their senses. Testing ideas Item 5. Most snakes are oviparous (laying shelled eggs); some are ovoviviparous (giving birth to well-formed young); very few are viviparous (giving birth to young with a primitive placenta for exchange of materials between embryonic and maternal bloodstreams). Item 7. All black parents will give birth to black babies. It was reported that a couple who were biracial themselves gave birth to two twin sisters. The couple’s mothers are both white and their fathers are black. One of the twin sisters was blonde and fair skinned while the other was black. Two eggs were fertilised at the same time in the mother’s womb and the mother gave birth to the two twin sisters. Scientists would test their ideas so as to construct a hypothesis to explain the observation. They may carry out experiments to test their hypotheses. When they do experiments, they would change the factor to be studied and keep other variables constant (fair test). Hypothesis Scientists may use induction or deduction to test their hypotheses. In induction scientists use separate observations to arrive at general principles. In deduction scientists arrive at a specific conclusion from general principles. Skin colour is determined by different genes working together. If a woman is of mixed race, her eggs usually contain a mixture of genes coding for both black and white skin. Similarly, a man of mixed race has a variety of genes in his sperm. When these eggs and sperm fuse together, they will create a baby of mixed race. If both the egg and sperm contain all white genes, the baby will be white. And if both contain just the versions necessary for black skin, the baby will be black. Item 8. All jelly fish are toxic to humans. There are more than 10,000 species of jellyfish in the sea. More than 100 species of the jellyfish are toxic to humans causing cutaneous rashes or cardiovascular/ respiratory collapse. (http://sky. prohosting.com/minogue2/sting/jellyfishsting-836.htm retrieved on 9 Nov. 06) Item 10. All headaches can be relieved by taking panadol. This is not true because there is individual difference regarding the response to a drug. P 20 P 21 Testing Hypothesis (II) Testing Hypothesis (I) Specific observations Specific observations It is observed that z copper, aluminium, gold and iron are metals; z all of them are at solid state under room temperature and pressure. It is observed that z copper, aluminium, gold and iron are metals; z all of them are at solid state under room temperature and pressure. Induction Induction General hypothesis General hypothesis All metals are at solid state under room temperature and pressure. All metals are at solid state under room temperature and pressure. Deduction Therefore general hypothesis is rejected. Specific Hypothesis General Hypothesis is accepted. Deduction Specific Hypothesis It is believed that all metals are at solid state under room temperature and pressure. ˜̇ʳ˼̆ʳ˵˸˿˼˸̉˸˷ʳ̇˻˴̇ʳ˴˿˿ʳ̀˸̇˴˿̆ʳ˴̅˸ʳ˴̇ʳsolid state under room temperature and pressure. Metal X has metallic properties Î Metal X should be at solid state under room temperature and pressure. Metal X has metallic properties Î Metal X should be at solid state under room temperature and pressure. Testing (e.g. controlled experiments) Specific Hypothesis is accepted. Specific Hypothesis is false Specific observations If metal X is at solid state under room temperature and pressure, Testing (e.g. controlled experiments) Specific observations If metal X is NOT at solid state under room temperature and pressure, Reference: Peter Castro & Michael E. Huber (2005) P 22 P 23 Students’ Worksheet The Structure of a Logical Argument involves a premise/premises and a conclusion. Arguments all follow a certain basic structure. They begin with one or more premises. Premises are facts and these facts are used as the starting point of an argument. Then a principle of logic is applied in order to come to a conclusion. Please write down the logical statements about the colour of swans: Lesson 1 Nature of Science Activity 1: Material: coloured tokens, opaque plastic bags Instruction: (a). The class is divided into groups of 5 students. In each group 3 students act as the team players while 2 students act as observers, observer A and B. (b). All the observer As and Bs will go outside the classroom when the teacher explains to the team players the rules of the game. Then all the observers will come back to the classroom and observe the team players to play the game. (c). After 1 minute the observers will be allowed to play the game. If the observers play wrongly, team players can only say the word “wrong” but they are not allowed to give further hints. (d). The observers need to record down their observations and hypotheses about the rule of the game. (e). The time limit for the game with the participation of the observers is 2 minutes. (f). Then the observers are required to present the rules of the game. Activity 2: You are given some red packets. Each of you needs to open the red packets one by one and tell your classmates what is inside the red packet. Activity 4 When a ping-pong ball, a basket ball, a football, a tennis ball are dropped from a certain height above the ground, they would fall on the ground and bounce back and finally stay on the ground. Try to write down some logical statements about the above phenomena. Your conclusion is based on some observation and experiments. Q2.1. Predict the possibility that the next red packet would contain lucky money and explain your view points. Q4.1. Are the results of your experiments consistent without contradiction? _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Activity 3 Q3.1. What is the colour of swans? Q4.2. Supposing that you were given a ball made of a certain material, X and required to carry out the same experiment as above, how would you comment on your previous conclusion if you get contradictory result later? _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Q3.2. Do you have any comments on the following argument? All the swans in France were observed as white. All the swans in Germany were also observed as white. Then, all swans in the world were white in colour. _____________________________________________________________________________ In fact, the above statements are examples of logical statements. Try to present the above statements in Mathematical terms. P 24 P 25 Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities Activity 5 (True or False) 1. All swans are white. ( 2. All plants possess chlorophyll. ( 3. All fishes breathe with gills. ( 4. All newborn mammals feed on mothers’ milk. ( 5. All snakes reproduce by laying eggs. ( 6. All living things are composed of basic units called cells. ( 7. All black parents will give birth to black babies. ( 8. All jelly fish (more than 10,000 species in the sea) are toxic to humans.( 9. All matters are made of particles called atoms. ( 10. All headaches can be relieved by taking panadol. ( ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Q5.1. Can you think of ways to enhance the validity of the conclusion drawn by the method “induction by examples”? Lesson 2 Causal Inference-Mill’s Method in Causal Reasoning Level of Students: S.1-S.2 Suggested Lesson Time: 90 min. Learning Objectives: Students will: gain an understanding of Mill’s Method in causal reasoning be able to use Mill’s Method to analyse and interpret observations for the purpose of drawing conclusions about the causal relationships they exhibit be able to understand the limitations of Mill’s Method in causal reasoning Materials and Apparatus for each group: Michael Faraday’s Experiment _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Q5.2. What is the value of drawing conclusion by induction by examples? copper coil ammeter A _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ammeter, 1 copper coil, 1 bar magnet, 1 iron bar, connecting wires Prior knowledge of students: Students should have the basic knowledge of scientific investigation learnt in S.1. The teacher can ask students a few simple questions on causal reasoning to understand how much they know on the topic. P 26 P 27 Suggested Learning and Teaching Time allocation Activities: Lesson 2 90 min. Causal Inference-Mill’s Method in causal reasoning Activity 1a & 1b (Method of Agreement) Activity 2 (Method of Difference) Activity 3 (Joint Method of Agreement and Difference) 20 min 20 min Remarks The students are divided into groups of 4-5 members. The team-mates are required to discuss the cases together and prepare a presentation. The teacher then discusses the findings with the students and comments on the use of Mill’s Method in causal reasoning. The focus of Activity 1a and 1b is to let students know the logic of using Method of Agreement (Mill’s method) in causal reasoning and its limitation: People will be blinded by apparent causal relationship but in fact there are real reasons other than that of observed. Cannot observe all possible cases The focus of the Michael Faraday’s Experiment is to let students know the logic of using Method of Difference (Mill’s method) in causal reasoning and its limitation: If there are more than one variable in the experimental design, the results obtained are not conclusive. Teacher may ask the following question to relate “fair test” to Method of Difference: “We usually use “fair test” in scientific investigation. Does the “fair test” idea match with Mill’s Method of Difference?” Suggested answer: Mill’s Method may include two or several experimental groups and one control group. In this sense it is similar to fair test experiments. The focus of Activity 3 is to let students know the logic of using Joint Method of Agreement and Difference in causal reasoning and its limitation: Should observe more cases to minimise the chance factor, otherwise cannot avoid co-incidence or unrelated situations 20 min P 28 Activity 4 (Method of Residues) 10 min. The focus of Activity 4 is to let students know the logic of using Method of Residues in causal reasoning and its limitation: Sometimes it is difficult to use the Method of Residue to find the causal relationship because the remaining factor found is a compound factor. As in the discovery of radium, Marie Curie first isolated Po (plutonium) and then found radium which contributed to the major difference in the observed radioactivity of the uranium sample. Activity 5 (Method of Concomitant Variation) 20 min. The focus of Activity 5 is to let students know the logic of using Method of Concomitant Variation in causal reasoning and its limitation: Two events have correlation but it is not necessary for them to have causal relationship. For instance, many overweight people would die at young ages. However, overweight is not a direct cause of early death. Many irrelevant factors would increase or decrease concomitantly. For instance, both the average rain falls per year and the birth rates in Hong Kong have been decreasing. It is unlikely that the amount of rainfall affects the birth rate. There is a limit to the degree of change in circumstance and effect. The circumstance must be the only cause for the effect. P 29 PowerPoint Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context Causes Lesson 2 Causal Inference – Mill’s Methods of causal reasoning Effects Inductive reasoning Task 1a: Task 1a: 1. Use flow charts / comparison tables / diagrams to illustrate how Dr. R arrived at his proposition that mosquitoes might be responsible for the transmission of the micro-organisms that cause disease X. 2. Use simple diagrams to show the logic of the causal relationship in case 1(a). Causal relationships among events Activity 1a Form 5 groups Disease X was recorded long time ago. People with disease X would have shaking chills at regular time intervals (usually at mid-day between 11 a.m. to 12 noon), followed by high fever lasting for 2 to 6 hours. The patients may also have symptoms like headaches, vomiting, delirium, anxiety and restlessness. It was also discovered that the blood of the infected patients contained a micro-organism that was a new species of parasite at that time. Study and discuss the given cases Group presentation In an uneventful afternoon, four students of school A suffered from severe diarrhea. All of them went to the hospital and the doctor naturally suspected that the symptom might be related to the food eaten by the students during lunch. Student Activity 1a Activity 1b Activity 1b Activity 1a Some doctors# also observed that people sleeping outdoors were more susceptible to get the disease than those sleeping indoors; A doctor (Dr. R) made a lot of efforts in the research of disease X. He observed that Disease X was widely spread in the following areas in 1895: people sleeping near a camp fire were less susceptible to get the disease. Activity 1a Activity 1a Place Natural Environment A Near a river B Inside a forest C Near the marshes D Paddy fields Dr. R also observed that there were a lot of mosquitoes in places A, B, C and D. He suggested that mosquitoes might be responsible for the transmission of the microorganisms that caused Disease X. Food items 1 pizza, orange juice, cookie, vegetable salad 2 hot dog, French fries, vegetable salad, iced tea 3 pizza, vegetable salad, coca cola, cheese cake 4 hamburger, orange juice, vegetable salad, cheese cake The doctor asked the students what they ate for lunch and their answers were as follows: Task 1b: Task 1b: 1. Use a table / diagram to show the logic of the possible cause of diarrhea among the students. 2. Do you know the name of this method of establishing causal relationship? 3. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? Task 1b: Case/event Circumstance Effect 1 B, C, D, A x 2 E, F, A, G x 3 B, A, H, I x 4 J, C, A, I x Conclusion: P 30 Mill’s Method of Agreement (求同法) A is the cause of x P 31 Task 1b: Activity 2 You may get the answer “vegetable salad” from the Method of Agreement. But the pathology tests showed that there were no bacteria causing diarrhea found in the vegetable salad. The actual cause why these four students suffered from diarrhea was that the forks they used to eat the vegetable salad were contaminated with bacteria. Micheal Faraday’s Electro-magnetic People will be blinded by apparent causal relationship but in fact there are real reasons other than that of observed. For instance, in the malaria case above people believed that the cause of malaria was marsh but the true reasons are that the parasites that cause malaria can be carried by mosquitoes that breed in water. Answer: Mill’s Method of Difference (求異法) 2. Place a bar magnet into the copper coil (no movement of the magnet) and observe the reading of the ammeter. Discovery of a ‘strange’ disease by Dr. Sun Simiao (孫思邈) 1. Activity 3 Design a table to record the results of the above experiment. 2. Suggest the cause of the change (if any) in Faraday’s Experiment. 3. Use a comparison table / diagram to show the logic of the discovery by Faraday. 4. Do you know the name of the method (in (3)) of establishing the causal relationship? No No Movement of iron What is the precaution of applying the method (in (4)) in causal reasoning? Yes Movement of the pointer of ammeter No No No Answer: Movement of magnet Yes Movement of the pointer of ammeter Yes He then noted that the disease was not found among the poor people who ate coarse rice. He concluded that the cause of the disease was related to the eating of polished rice. He then asked the patients to eat coarse rice instead of polished rice. Luckily, all the patients were cured within half a month. Task 2 Task 2 Task 3: 2. Suggest the cause of change (if any) in Faraday’s Experiment. 3. Use a comparison table / diagram to show the logic of the discovery by Faraday. 1. Case/event 1 2 All the famous doctors could not treat the diseases. Dr. Sun was invited to treat one of the patients. He went to the kitchen of one of the rich patients. The cook told him that his master did not like to eat too much meat and fish but he liked to eat polished rice (white rice which had been polished several times). Dr. Sun also paid visits to several rich patients who suffered from the same diseases. He found that these patients had the same habit of eating polished rice. 2. Do you know the name of the method (in (1)) of establishing the causal relationship? 3. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? Task 3: Use a table / diagram to show the logic of the discovery of the cause of the disease. 2. Do you know the name of the method (in (1)) of establishing the causal relationship? Circumstance A, B, C - B, C Effect x x Case Conditions Answer: Symptom W X Y (ate polished rice) leg edema, muscle pain, fatigue and tiredness Patient A (rich) (+ve gp) Yes No Yes Yes Patient B (rich) (+ve gp) No No Yes Yes C (poor) (-ve gp) Yes No No No D (poor) (-ve gp) No Yes No No Mill’s Joint Method of Agreement and Difference (求同求異並用法) Conclusion: A is the cause of x P 32 Answer: Answer: Conclusion: change of magnetic field causes generation of electricity. Their symptoms included leg edema, muscle pain, fatigue and tiredness. Task 3: 1. Use a table / diagram to show the logic of the discovery of the cause of the disease. Design a table to record the results of the above experiment. 1. It’s the movement of the magnet that causes the pointer of the ammeter moves. All of them got a strange disease at the same time. Task 2 Dr Sun Simiao (孫思邈) (AD 581-682) was a very famous doctor in Tang Dynasty. There were several rich people living in the capital of China, Changon. Repeat steps (3) and (4) by replacing the bar magnet with an iron bar. 4. Activity 3 Place a bar magnet into the copper coil and move the bar magnet forward and backward. Observe the reading of the ammeter. 3. Answer: If there are more than one variable in the experimental design, the results obtained are not conclusive. Activity 3 Assemble the above experimental set-up. S 5. Answer: Mill’s Method of Difference includes Experimental and Control groups. Activity 2 Task 2: 5. What is the precaution of applying the method (in(4) in the causal reasoning? Remarks: 1. N Task 2 4. Do you know the name of the method (in(3)) of establishing the casual relationship? Induction Experiment Activity 2 Task 2 P 33 Activity 5 Activity 4 Task 3: Activity 5 3. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? The Discovery of Radium by Marie Curie. We should consider and compare as many conditions and symptoms as possible among the +ve and –ve groups in order to minimise the chance factor. was the 5th leading cause of death, and accounted for at least Air pollution increases hospital admissions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Hong Kong Answer: In Hong Kong, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) 4% of all public hospital acute admissions in 2003. The prevalence of COPD among elderly Chinese (age ≥70 years) living in Hong Kong is estimated to be 9%. Previous studies have shown that pulmonary function and quality of life among patients with COPD were adversely affected by frequent exacerbations. Activity 4 Activity 4 In Marie Curie’s time a radioactive substance, uranium was Activity 5 One day when Marie Curie and his husband were doing research on discovered. When uranium compound was placed onto a some samples containing uranium, they discovered that the was carried out by the Department of Medicine and photographic plate covered with black paper, it produced radioactivity measured was far greater than that of uranium. They Therapeutics and the Department of Community and an impression analogous to that which light would make on began to suspect that the sample contained other radioactive active Family Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong. that plate. The impression is due to uranium rays that pollutants (sulphur dioxide [SO2], nitrogen dioxides [NO2], ozone [O3], particulates with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10μm [PM10] and 2.5μm [PM2.5]) and meteorological variables from January 2000 to December COPD in Hong Kong. 2004 were obtained from several government departments. work the couple isolated a very minute quantity of black power, it behaves like a conductor. Data of daily emergency hospital admissions to 15 major hospitals in Hong Kong for COPD and indices of air ambient air pollutants and the hospitalisation rate due to for the unknown radioactive substance. Finally, after 45 months’ hard can discharge an electroscope by making the air surrounds This study assessed the relationship between the levels of substances. Then they carried out numerous experiments to search traverse the paper. These same rays are like X-rays, which Activity 5 A study has just been published in the journal THORAX radium chloride in 1902. Activity 5 Task 4 Task 4 1.Show the logic (method) in the cause of the discovery of radium by Marie Curie. 1.Show the logic (method) in the cause of the discovery of radium by Marie Curie. Answer: Symbolically, the Method of residues can be represented as: A B C occur together with x y z B is known to be the cause of y C is known to be the cause of z Therefore A is the cause of x e.g. 1. Let A be Uranium and “a” be the radioactivity measured due to the effect of A 2. Let B be the unknown radioactive substance and “b” be the radioactivity measured due to the effect of B. 3. Since the radioactivity measured was higher than expected (a+b>a), then the source of the radioactivity must come from radioactive substance(s) other than A. 2. Do you know the name of the method (in (1)) of establishing causal relationship? 3. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? Task 4 Task 4 3. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? 2. Do you know the name of the method (in (1)) of establishing the causal relationship? Answer: Answer: The induction method is called Method of Residues. P 34 Only when it is clear that certain part of the phenomenon or observation is due to some recognized reason/factors, can the factor/reason that can account for the remaining part of the observation/phenomenon be confirmed. Sometimes it is difficult to use the Method of Residue to find the causal relationship because the remaining factor found is a compound factor. As in the discovery of radium, Marie Curie first isolated Po (plutonium) and then found radium which contributed to the major difference in the observed radioactivity of the uranium sample. Activity 5 Significant associations were found between hospital admissions for COPD with all 5 air pollutants. For every Adverse effects of ambient concentrations of air 10μg/m3 increase in SO2, NO2, O3, PM10 and PM2.5, there pollutants on hospitalization rates for COPD are was 0.7%, 2.6%, 3.4%, 2.4% and 3.1% increases in the evident, especially during the winter season in Hong rates of COPD hospitalizations respectively. O3 had the Kong. Measures to improve air quality are urgently strongest effect on COPD hospitalizations. The effect of SO2, needed. NO2, and O3 had a stronger effect on COPD admissions in the cold season (December to March) than during the warm season. (Press Release of CUHK 6 March 2007) Task 5 1. Task 5 Use one or two sentences to describe the findings 1. of the Chinese University of Hong Kong? 2. the Chinese University of Hong Kong? Please use a table/diagram to represent the logic in establishing the causal relationship. Do you Answer: Air Pollution Increases Hospital Admissions for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Hong Kong. know the name of the method (in (2)) of establishing such causal relationship? 3. Use one or two sentences to describe the findings of What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? P 35 Teachers’ Reference Task 5 Task 5 Case/event Circumstance Effect 1 A, B, C x 2 A+, D, E X+ 3 A-, F, G X- Concomitant Variation Learning Objectives Students will: gain an understanding of Mill’s Method in causal reasoning; be able to use Mill’s method to analyze and interpret observations for the purpose of drawing conclusions about the causal relationships they exhibit; be able to understand the limitations of Mill’s method in causal reasoning. Evidence:There is a direct correlation between the degree to which the cause occurred and the degree to which the effect occurred. Conclusion: A and x has a causal relationship. A is the cause of x. Suggested Lesson Time: 90 minutes Task 5 a) b) c) d) Make observations Two events have correlation but it is not necessary for them to have causal relationship. For instance, many overweight people would die at young ages. However, overweight is not a direct cause of early death. Many irrelevant factors would increase or decrease concomitantly. For instance, both of the average rain falls per year and the birth rates in Hong Kong have been decreasing. It is not likely that the amount of rainfall affects the birth rate. There is a limit to degree of change in circumstance and effect The circumstance must be the only cause for the effect Method of Difference 求異法 Joint method of Agreement and Difference 求同求異並用法 Method of Concomitant Variation 共變法 Lesson 2 Causal Inference-Mill’s Method in Causal Reasoning Analyse and interpret the observations Draw conclusions about the causal relationships Activity 1(a) Disease X was recorded long time ago. People with disease X have shaking chills at regular time intervals (usually at mid-day between 11 a.m. to 12 noon), followed by high fever lasting for 2 to 6 hours. The patients may also have other symptoms like headaches, vomiting, delirium, anxiety and restlessness. It was also discovered that the blood of the infected patients contained a micro-organism that was a new species of parasite at that time. Some doctors also observed that people sleeping outdoors were more susceptible to get the disease that those of sleeping indoors; people sleeping near a camp fire were less susceptible to get the disease. Method of Agreement 求同法 What are your comments on Mill‛s Methods of causal reasoning? Mill’s methods in caus al reas oning Method of Residues 剩餘法 Mill’s methods of causal reasoning Mill’s methods of causal reasoning Discovery or Proof ? Confirmation - as tools for confirming hypotheses - useful if we have already proposed several specific hypotheses about what may be the cause of an observed event - can’t be used to discover the cause of some observed event - can only be used to establish the correlation between the occurrences of distinct events P 36 A doctor (Dr. R) made a lot of efforts in researching Disease X. He observed that disease X was widely spread in the following areas in 1895: Place Natural Environment A Near a river B Inside a forest C Near the marshes D Paddy fields P 37 Dr. R also observed that there were a lot of mosquitoes in places A, B, C and D. He suggested that mosquitoes might be responsible for the transmission of the micro-organisms that caused Disease X. Task 1(a): 1. Use flow charts / comparison tables / diagrams to illustrate how Doctor R arrived at his proposition that mosquitoes might be responsible for the transmission of the micro-organisms that cause Diseased X. Place Circumstance Disease X A (Near a river) Water + mosquitoes + + plants P1, P2, P3 … + animals A1, A2, A3 … B (Inside a forest) Water + mosquitoes + + plants P1, P2, P3, P4 … + animals A1, A2, A3, A4 … C (Near the marshes) Water + mosquitoes + + plants P1, P2, P3, P4, P5 … + animals A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 … D (Paddy fields) Water + mosquitoes + + plants P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6 … + animals A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6 … => Either water or mosquitoes may be related to Disease X With reference to the observation of some doctors, it is more likely for mosquitoes to spread Disease X. Remarks: After years of hard work on researching Disease X, Dr. R discovered that mosquitoes were the carriers of the parasite, which caused Disease X and such a great discovery has led Dr. R to get the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1902. Disease X is Malaria and Dr. R was Ronald Ross. 2. Use simple diagrams to show the logic of the causal relationship in case 1(a). Event/Case Circumstance Effect 1 E, R, Y, Z e, r, y, z 2 E, P, Q, T e, p, q, t 3 E, H, J, K e, h, j, k 4 E, L, M, N e, l, m, n => E and e has a causal relationship P 38 Remarks: Mill’s Method of Agreement: investigation of the cases in which the effect occurred revealed only one prior circumstance that all of them shared. Activity 1(b) In an uneventful afternoon, four students of School A suffered from severe diarrhea. All of them went to the hospital and the doctor naturally suspected that the symptom might be related to the food eaten by the students during lunch. The doctor asked the students what they ate for lunch and their answers were as follows: Student 1 2 3 4 Food items pizza, orange juice, cookie, vegetable salad hot dog, French fries, vegetable salad, iced tea pizza, vegetable salad, coca cola, cheese cake hamburger, orange juice, vegetable salad, cheese cake Task 1(b) 1. Use a table / diagram to show the logic of the possible cause of diarrhea among the students. Case/event 1 2 3 4 Circumstance B, C, D, A E, F, A, G B, A, H, I J, C, A, I Effect x x x x Conclusion: A is the cause of x 2. Do you know the name of this method of establishing the causal relationship? Mill’s Method of Agreement (求同法) 3. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? You may get the answer “vegetable salad” from the method of agreement. But pathology tests showed that there were no bacteria causing diarrhea found in the vegetable salad. The actual cause why these four students suffered from diarrhea was that the forks they used to eat the vegetable salad were contaminated with bacteria. People will be blinded by apparent causal relationship but in fact there are real reasons other than that of observed. For instance, in the malaria case above, people believed that the cause of malaria was marsh but the true reasons are that the parasites that cause malaria can be carried by mosquitoes that breed in water. P 39 Activity 2: Michael Faraday’s Experiment 3. Use a comparison table / diagram to show the logic of the discovery by Faraday. Case/event 1 2 copper coil A ammeter 1. Assemble the above experimental set-up. Circumstance A, B, C - B, C Effect x - Conclusion:A is the cause of x 4. Do you know the name of the method (in (3)) of establishing the causal relationship? Mill’s Method of Difference (求異法) 2. Place a bar magnet into the copper coil (no movement of the magnet) and observe the reading of the ammeter. Remarks: Mill’s Method of Difference includes Experimental and Control groups. 3. Place a bar magnet into the copper coil and move the bar magnet forward and backward. Observe the reading of the ammeter. 5. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (4)) in the causal reasoning? If there are more than one variables in the experimental design, the results obtained are not conclusive. 4. Repeat steps (3) and (4) by replacing the bar magnet with an iron bar. Task 2: 1. Design a table to record the results of the above experiment. Movement of magnet Yes No Movement of the pointer of ammeter Yes No Movement of iron Yes No Movement of ammeter No No 2. Suggest the cause of change (if any) in Faraday’s Experiment. It’s the movement of the magnet that causes the pointer of the ammeter to move. Conclusion: Change of magnetic field causes generation of electricity. P 40 P 41 Activity 3 Dr. Sun Simiao (孫思邈) (AD 581-682) was a very famous doctor in Tang Dynasty. There were several rich people living in the capital of China, Changon. All of them were suffered from a strange disease at the same time and they all had similar symptoms, including leg edema, muscle pain, fatigue and tiredness. All the famous doctors could not treat the diseases. Dr. Sun was invited to treat one of the patients. He went to the kitchen of one of the rich patients. The cook told him that his master did not like to eat too much meat or fish but he liked to eat polished rice (white rice which had been polished several times). Dr. Sun also paid visits to several rich patients who suffered from the same diseases. He found that these patients had a similar habit of eating polished rice. He then noted that the diseases were not found among the poor people who ate coarse rice. He concluded that the cause of the disease was related to the eating of polished rice. He then asked the patients to eat coarse rice instead. Luckily, all the patients were cured within half a month. Task 3: 1. Use a table / diagram to show the logic of the discovery of the cause of the disease. Case Patient A (rich) (+ve gp) Patient B (rich) (+ve gp) C (poor) (-ve gp) D (poor) (-ve gp) Conditions Symptom Activity 4 THE DISCOVERY OF RADIUM by Marie Curie In Marie Curie’s time a radioactive substance, uranium was discovered. When uranium compound was placed onto a photographic plate covered with black paper, it produced an impression analogous to that which light would make on that plate. The impression is due to uranium rays that traverse the paper. One day when Marie Curie and his husband were doing research on some samples containing uranium, they discovered that the radioactivity measured was far greater than that of uranium. They began to suspect that the sample contained other radioactive active substances. Then they carried out numerous experiments to search for the unknown radioactive substance. Finally, after 45 months’ hard work the couple isolated a very minute quantity of black power, radium chloride in 1902. 1. Show the logic (method) in the cause of the discovery of radium by Marie Curie. Symbolically, the Method of residues can be represented as: A, B, C occur together with x, y, z B is known to be the cause of y C is known to be the cause of z Therefore, A is the cause of x. e.g. Let A be Uranium and “a” be the radioactivity measured due to the effect of A. Let B be the unknown radioactive substance and “b” be the radioactivity measured due to the effect of B. Since the radioactivity measured was higher than expected (a+b>a), then the source of the radioactivity must come from radioactive substance(s) other than A. W X Y (ate polished rice) Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No 2. Do you know the name of the method (in (1)) of establishing the causal relationship? The induction method is called Method of Residues. No Yes No No 3. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? leg edema, muscle pain, fatigue and tiredness 2. Do you know the name of the method (in (1)) of establishing the causal relationship? Mill’s Joint Method of Agreement and Difference (求同求異並用法) 3. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? We should consider and compare as many conditions and symptoms as possible among the +ve and –ve groups in order to minimise the chance factor. P 42 Sometimes it is difficult to use the Method of Residue to find the causal relationship because the remaining factor found is a compound factor. As in the discovery of radium, Marie Curie first isolated Po (plutonium) and then found radium which contributed to the major difference in the observed radioactivity of the uranium sample. P 43 Activity 5 2. Please use a table/diagram to represent the logic in establishing the causal relationship. Air Pollution Increases Hospital Admissions for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Hong Kong In Hong Kong, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) was the 5th leading cause of death, and accounted for at least 4% of all public hospital acute admissions in 2003. The prevalence of COPD among elderly Chinese (age ≥70 years) living in Hong Kong is estimated to be 9%. Previous studies have shown that pulmonary function and quality of life among patients with COPD were adversely affected by frequent exacerbations. A study has just been published in the journal THORAX and was carried out by the Department of Medicine and Therapeutics and the Department of Community and Family Medicine of the Chinese University of Hong Kong and. This study assessed the relationship between the levels of ambient air pollutants and the hospitalisation rate due to COPD in Hong Kong. Data of daily emergency hospital admissions to 15 major hospitals in Hong Kong for COPD and indices of air pollutants (sulphur dioxide [ SO2 ], nitrogen dioxides [NO2 ], ozone [ O3 ], particulates with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 μ m [PM10] and 2.5 μ m [PM2.5]) and meteorological variables from January 2000 to December 2004 were obtained from several government departments. Significant associations were found between hospital admissions for COPD with all 3 five air pollutants. For every 10mg/ m increase in SO2 ,NO2 , O3 , PM10 and PM2.5, there was 0.7%, 2.6%, 3.4%, 2.4% and 3.1% increases in the rates of COPD hospitalisation respectively. O3 had the strongest effect on COPD hospitalisation. The effect of SO2 ,NO2 and O3 had a stronger effect on COPD admissions in the cold season (December to March) than during the warm season. Adverse effects of ambient concentrations of air pollutants on hospitalisation rates for COPD are evident, especially during the winter in Hong Kong. Measures to improve air quality are urgently needed. Case/event 1 2 3 Circumstance A, B, C A+, D, E A-, F, G Effect x x+ x- Evidence: There is a direct correlation between the degree to which the cause occurred and the degree to which the effect occurred. Conclusion:A and x has a causal relationship A is the cause of x 3. The name of the above method in causal reasoning is called Method of Concomitant Variation. 4. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? (a). Two events have correlation but it is not necessary for them to have causal relationship. For instance, many overweight people would die at young ages. However, overweight is not a direct cause of early death. (b). Many irrelevant factors would increase or decrease concomitantly. For instance, both of the average rain falls per year and the birth rates in Hong Kong have been decreasing. It is not likely that the amount of rainfall affects the birth rate. (c). There is a limit to degree of change in circumstance and effect. (d). The circumstance must be the only cause for the effect. (Press Release of CUHK 6 March 2007) Task 5: 1. Use one or two sentences to describe the findings of the Chinese University of Hong Kong? Air Pollution Increases Hospital Admissions for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Hong Kong. P 44 P 45 Students’ Worksheet Task 1(a): 1. Use flow charts / comparison tables / diagrams to illustrate how Doctor R arrived at his proposition that mosquitoes might be responsible for the transmission of the micro-organisms that cause Diseased X. Lesson 2 Causal Inference Activity 1(a) Disease X was recorded long time ago. People with disease X would have shaking chills at regular time intervals (usually at mid-day between 11 a.m. to 12 noon), followed by high fever lasting for 2 to 6 hours. The patients may also have symptoms like headaches, vomiting, delirium, anxiety and restlessness. It was also discovered that the blood of the infected patients contained a microorganism that was a new species of parasite at that time. Some doctors also observed that people sleeping outdoors were more susceptible to get the disease that those sleeping indoors; people sleeping near a camp fire were less susceptible to get the disease. A doctor (Dr. R) made a lot of efforts in researching Disease X. He observed that Disease X was widely spread in the following areas in 1895: Place A B C D Natural Environment Near a river Inside a forest Near the marshes Paddy fields 2. Use simple diagrams to show the logic of the causal relationship in case 1(a). Dr. R also observed that there were a lot of mosquitoes in places A, B, C and D. He suggested that mosquitoes might be responsible for the transmission of the microorganisms that caused Disease X. P 46 P 47 Activity 1(b) In an uneventful afternoon, 4 students of school A suffered from severe diarrhea. All of them went to the hospital and the doctor naturally suspected that the symptom might be related to the food eaten by the students during lunch. The doctor asked the students what they had eaten for lunch and their answers were as follows: Student 1 2 3 4 Food items pizza, orange juice, cookie, vegetable salad hot dog, French fries, vegetable salad, iced tea pizza, vegetable salad, coca cola, cheese cake hamburger, orange juice, vegetable salad, cheese cake Task 1(b) 1. Use a table / diagram to show the logic of the possible cause of diarrhea among the students. Activity 2: Michael Faraday’s Experiment copper coil A ammeter 1. Assemble the above experimental set-up. 2. Place a bar magnet into the copper coil (no movement of the magnet) and observe the reading of the ammeter. 3. Place a bar magnet into the copper coil and move the bar magnet forward and backward. Observe the reading of the ammeter. 4. Repeat steps (3) and (4) by replacing the bar magnet with an iron bar. 2. Do you know the name of this method of establishing the causal relationship? Task 2: 1. Design a table to record the results of the above experiment. 2. Suggest the cause of change (if any) in Faraday’s Experiment. 3. Use a comparison table / diagram to show the logic of the discovery by Faraday. 3. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? 4. Do you know the name of the method (in (3)) of establishing the causal relationship? 5. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (4)) in the causal reasoning? P 48 P 49 Activity 3 2. Do you know the name of the method (in (1)) of establishing the causal relationship? Dr. Sun Simiao (孫思邈) (AD 581-682) was a very famous doctor in Tang Dynasty. There were several rich people living in the capital of China, Changon. All of them were suffered from a strange disease at the same time and they all had similar symptoms, including leg edema, muscle pain, fatigue and tiredness. All the famous doctors could not treat the diseases. 3. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? Dr. Sun was invited to treat one of the patients. He went to the kitchen of one of the rich patients. The cook told him that his master did not like to eat too much meat or fish but he liked to eat polished rice (white rice which had been polished several times). Dr. Sun also paid visits to several rich patients who suffered from the same diseases. He found that these patients had a similar habit of eating polished rice. He then noted that the diseases were not found among the poor people who ate coarse rice. He concluded that the cause of the disease was related to the eating of polished rice. He then asked the patients to eat coarse rice instead. Luckily, all the patients were cured within half a month. Task 3: 1. Use a table / diagram to show the logic of the discovery of the cause of the disease. P 50 P 51 Activity 5 Activity 4 THE DISCOVERY OF RADIUM by Marie Curie In Marie Curie’s time a radioactive substance, uranium was discovered. When uranium compound was placed upon a photographic plate covered with black paper, it produced on that plate an impression analogous to that which light would make. The impression is due to uranium rays that traverse the paper. These same rays can, like X-rays, discharge an electroscope, by making the air which surrounds it a conductor. One day when Marie Curie and his husband were doing research on some samples containing uranium, they discovered that the radioactivity measured was far greater than that of uranium. They began to suspect that the sample contained other radioactive active substances. They began to carry out numerous experiments to search for the unknown radioactive substance. Finally, after 45 months’ hard work the couple isolated very minute quantity of a black power, radium chloride in 1902. Task 4 1. Show the logic (method) in the cause of the discovery of radium by Marie Curie. 2. Do you know the name of the method (in (1)) of establishing causal relationship? 3. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? Air Pollution Increases Hospital Admissions for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Hong Kong In Hong Kong, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) was the 5th leading cause of death, and accounted for at least 4% of all public hospital acute admissions in 2003. The prevalence of COPD among elderly Chinese (age ≥70 years) living in Hong Kong is estimated to be 9%. Previous studies have shown that pulmonary function and quality of life among patients with COPD were adversely affected by frequent exacerbations. A study has just been published in the journal THORAX and was carried out by the Department of Medicine and Therapeutics and the Department of Community and Family Medicine of the Chinese University of Hong Kong and. This study assessed the relationship between the levels of ambient air pollutants and the hospitalisation rate due to COPD in Hong Kong. Data of daily emergency hospital admissions to 15 major hospitals in Hong Kong for COPD and indices of air pollutants (sulphur dioxide [ SO2 ], nitrogen dioxides [NO2 ], ozone [ O3 ], particulates with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 μ m [PM10] and 2.5 μ m [PM2.5]) and meteorological variables from January 2000 to December 2004 were obtained from several government departments. Significant associations were found between hospital admissions for COPD with all 3 five air pollutants. For every 10mg/ m increase in SO2 ,NO2 , O3 , PM10 and PM2.5, there was 0.7%, 2.6%, 3.4%, 2.4% and 3.1% increases in the rates of COPD hospitalisation respectively. O3 had the strongest effect on COPD hospitalisation. The effect of SO2 ,NO2 and O3 had a stronger effect on COPD admissions in the cold season (December to March) than during the warm season. Adverse effects of ambient concentrations of air pollutants on hospitalisation rates for COPD are evident, especially during the winter in Hong Kong. Measures to improve air quality are urgently needed. P 52 (Press Release of HKCU 6 March 2007) P 53 Task 5: Supplementary Notes 1. Use one or two sentences to describe the findings of the Chinese University of Hong Kong? Lesson 2 Causal Inference- Mill’s Methods of causal reasoning 1. Method of Agreement Case/event 1 2 3 2. Please use a table/diagram to represent the logic in establishing the causal relationship. Circumstance A, B, C A, D, E A, F, G Effect x x x Conclusion:A is the cause of x 2. Method of Difference Case/event 1 2 Circumstance A, B, C - B, C Effect x - Conclusion:A is the cause of x Remarks: Mill’s Method of Difference includes Experimental and Control groups 3. The name of the above method in causal reasoning is called _______________. 4. What is the precaution of applying the method (in (2)) in causal reasoning? 3. Joint Method of Agreement and Difference Positive group Negative group Comparison Case/event 1 2 3 1 2 3 Positive group Negative group Circumstance A, B, C A, D, E A, F, G - B, M - D, N - F, O If “A” is present, then “x” will occur. If “A” is absent, then “x” will not occur. Conclusion: A is the cause of x. P 54 P 55 Effect x x x - 4. Method of Residues Pattern of reasoning: Many elements of a complex effect are shown to result, by reliable causal beliefs, from several elements of a complex cause, whatever remains of the effect must then have been produced by whatever remains of the cause. Symbolically, the Method of Residues can be represented as: A, B, C occur together with x y z B is known to be the cause of y C is known to be the cause of z Therefore, A is the cause of x. e.g Let A be Uranium and “a” be the radioactivity measured due to the effect of A. Let B be the unknown radioactive substance and “b” be the radioactivity measured due to the effect of B. Since the radioactivity measured was higher than expected (a+b>a), then the source of the radioactivity must come from radioactive substance(s) other than A. 5. Limitations of using Mill’s five methods of causal reasoning to establish causal relationship in science? Mill’s Method of causal reasoning Method of Agreement 2.Cannot observe all possible cases Method of Difference If there are more than one variable in the experimental design, the results obtained are not conclusive. Joint Method of Agreement and Difference Should observe more cases to minimise the chance factor, otherwise cannot avoid co-incidence or unrelated situations Method of Residues Sometimes it is difficult to use the Method of Residue to find the causal relationship because the remaining factor found is a compound factor. As in the discovery of radium, Marie Curie first isolated Po (plutonium) and then found radium which contributed to the major difference in the observed radioactivity of the uranium sample. Method of Concomitant Variation 1. Two events have correlation but it is not necessary for them to have causal relationship. For instance, many overweight people would die at young ages. However, overweight is not a direct cause of early death. Method of Concomitant Variation Case/event 1 2 3 Circumstance A, B, C A+, D, E A-, F, G Effect x x+ x- Evidence: There is a direct correlation between the degree to which the cause occurred and the degree to which the effect occurred. Conclusion:A and x has a causal relationship. A is the cause of x. Limitations 1.People will be blinded by apparent causal relationship but in fact there are real reasons other than that of observed. 2. Many irrelevant factors would increase or decrease concomitantly. For instance, both the average rain falls per year and the birth rates in Hong Kong have been decreasing. It is unlikely that the amount of rainfall affects the birth rate. 3. There is a limit to degree of change in circumstance and effect. 4. The circumstance must be the only cause for the effect. P 56 P 57 Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities Lesson 3Testing a Hypothesis Student presentation: Actvity 1a Snapshots of Lesson 2 Causal Inference-Mill’s Methods Level of Students: S.1-S.2 Suggested Lesson Time: 90 min. Learning Objectives: Students will: have an understanding of how to test a hypothesis; be able to evaluate a hypothesis based on existent information/data. Materials and Apparatus for each group: A4 paper for drawing mind-map Bell-jar Candles (tall, medium, short) Gas lighter Students’ presentation on Activity 2 (Method of Difference) Teacher’s comment on Activity 1a & 1b (Method of Agreement) Prior knowledge of students: Students learnt basics of scientific investigation in S.1. The teacher can ask a few simple questions on how to test a hypothesis to get a general view on students’ knowledge on testing hypotheses. Students doing Activity 2: Michael Faraday’s experiment (Method of Difference) Students’ presentation on Activity 3 (Joint Method of Agreement & Difference) Students’ presentation on Activity 5 Method of Concomitant Variation) Students’ presentation on Activity 4 (Method of Residues) P 58 Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities: Lesson 3 Testing a Hypothesis Time Remarks allocation Approx. The students are divided into groups of 4-5 members 90 min. to carry out the activities. Activity 1 (Ignaz Semmelweis’ Discovery to the cause of Childbed Fever) 30 min. (a). The focus of this activity is to let students rediscover the cause of Childbed Fever by Doctor Ignaz Semmelweis in 1840s and let them go through his process of testing hypotheses based on existent information/data. (b). The criteria that can be used in making judgments about the reliability of a hypothesis to a scientific explanation include: • Relevance • Testability & falsifiability • Compatibility with known science concepts/laws/ principles • Good Predictive Power • Simplicity (the “Occam’s razor” principle) P 59 Activity 2 (Candle experiment) 40 min. (a). The focus of this activity is to let students use P-O-E method (Predict-Observe-Explain) to do a scientific investigation first. PowerPoint Activity 1 Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context (b). Then the students are further required to suggest a hypothesis to explain the observation. Part I of Ignaz Semmelweis’ Discovery to the cause of Childbed Fever Lesson 3 Testing a Hypothesis (c). They also need to list the steps to test their hypothesis. Activity 3 (Logic of testing a hypothesis) 20 min. The focus of this activity is to let students understand type 1 and type 2 hypotheses and their contribution to hypothesis testing. Ignaz Semmelweis was a doctor who worked in an Italian Year Hospital in 1840s. He noticed that many women died Death rate of maternity patients after child birth in the first ward shortly after childbirth in the ward (first ward) he and his colleagues were working. He called this phenomenon as “childbed fever” (產褥熱). He observed that the death rate due to childbed fever in the first ward was higher than that of the second ward Death rate of maternity patients after child birth in the second ward 2.3% 1844 8.2% 1845 6.8% 2.0% 1846 11.4% 2.7% attended only by midwifery students (Ignaz Semmelweis and other doctors did not help with the delivery of maternity patients in this ward) in the hospital for 3 consecutive years. The death rates of the maternity patients in the first and second ward of the hospital were as follows: (Reference: Carl G. Hempel (1966)) There were some hypotheses suggested to Hypothesis I: Atmospheric Change Hypothesis explain the above observations. You will be divided into groups of 4-5 students. Each group will be required to discuss the possibility of the different hypotheses. You are required to write down your discussion result in the form of a mind map. You may get further information on each hypothesis from the teacher after completion of the mind map. P 60 P 61 The cause of the higher rate of childbed fever is due to atmospheric-cosmic changes (大氣變化). Task 1: Hypothesis 2: Crowdedness Hypothesis What other information do you need to know before you agree or disagree with this hypothesis? Write down your discussion result with the aid of a mind map. The cause of the higher rate of childbed fever is due to crowdedness in the first ward. Task 2 (Your teacher will give you further information after you have completed task 1) Part III of Ignaz Semmelweis’ Discovery to the Cause of Childbed Fever Testing of his own Hypothesis: Semmelweis thought that it was the cadaveric matter in the corpse that entered the blood of professor Kolletschka infecting him with childbed fever. cadaveric matterscalpel blood of professor Kolletschka childbed feverdeath Can this hypothesis be used to explain Semmelweis’ findings? Semmlweis then instituted a strict policy in the first ward. Semmlweis, his colleagues and medical students used chlorinated lime (bleaching powder) to wash their hands prior to attending patients. The death rate of maternity patients dropped from 18.3% to 1.3% in 1848 and was even lower than that of the second ward (death rate: 1.33%). We call the cadaveric matter ‘bacteria’ nowadays. Explain your answer. Hypothesis 4: “Position In Delivery” Hypothesis Hypothesis 3: “Rude Manner In Examination” Hypothesis Activity 2: Activity 2: Reference: Learning from TIMSS (2006) The cause of the higher rate of childbed fever in the first ward was due to the rude manner of medical students when they examined the pregnant mothers between deliveries. The cause of the higher rate of childbed fever in the first ward was due to the supine position (lying flat on the back, face upwards) of pregnant mothers in delivery. Procedure: (a)Light up three candles of different lengths (tall, medium, short). (b)Predict the going out sequence of the candle flame when the three burning candles are covered with a bell jar as shown in the diagram below: (c) Cover the three burning candles with a bell jar. (d) Observe what happens and write down the results. Part II of Ignaz Semmelweis’ Discovery to the cause of Childbed Fever Group Discussion One colleague of Semmelweis, professor Kolletschka cut his own finger with a scalpel by accident when he was performing an autopsy. Such accidents happened quite often among doctors between deliveries. Professor Kolletschka developed symptoms similar to childbed fever later and died. P 62 a. If you were Semmelweis, what would you think? (any causal relationship between the accident and Professor Kolletschka’s death) b. Can you suggest a hypothesis to explain his death? c. What evidence was needed to support the hypothesis in (b)? Activity 2: Suggest a hypothesis to explain the above observation. Write down the steps to test your hypothesis. Then carry out the experiment if possible and see whether your hypothesis is right or wrong. If it is wrong, you need to think of a new hypothesis and test it again. P 63 Illustration of Type I Hypothesis Write down the logic of testing a hypothesis (Home Assignment). Implication: People would be infected with virus X if they talk to each other. Observation / Result: It is found that it is not the case that people became infected with virus X after talking to each other. Observation: The streets are wet. Conclusion: Therefore, dogs urinated. The flame of the tallest candle would go out first, then the medium size and finally the shortest one. The reason is that burning of the candles would produce carbon dioxide and the heat evolved would heat up carbon dioxide that rise upwards due to smaller density. The accumulation of a large amount of carbon dioxide at the top of the bell jar would put out the candle flame of the tallest candle first. Activity 3 Hypothesis: If dogs urinates in the street, then the streets are wet. Remarks: Remarks 1: The above argument does not prove that dogs urinated. It might be the case but might be some naughty boy did so. Remarks 2: Type 2 pattern of reasoning affirms the consequent implication. If the observation in Type 2 Hypothesis occurs, the hypothesis will be supported. However, the arguments in type 2 are not deductively valid. Type 1 Hypothesis Suggested answers: We can test scientific hypotheses by considering their implications and then use experiments or observation to test those implications. Let H be the hypothesis and I be the implication. P 64 If H is right, then I would happen. (If H, then I) I is not observed. (Not I ) So H is not right. (So, not H) If H is right, then I would happen. (If H, then I) I is observed. (I ) So H is right. (So, H) The observation and experiment in Type 1 Hypothesis refute the hypothesis. Deduction is widely used in scientific reasoning. Hypothesis: Virus X would infect people through air transmission Illustration of Type 2 Hypothesis Activity 3 Type 2 Hypothesis P 65 Scientists always put up a hypothesis, deduce implications from the hypothesis, test the implications by experiments and find out whether the experimental result confirms or refutes the hypothesis. Due to the reason as exemplified by illustration of Type 2 Hypothesis scientists can never be 100 percent certain that a scientific hypothesis is true. Scientific conclusions are always tentative and open to revision or correction. However, scientific conclusions can be affirmed with a high degree of confidence by means of carefully controlled experiments. Teachers’ Reference Year Lesson 3 Testing a Hypothesis Learning Objectives Students will: have an understanding of how to test for a hypothesis; be able to evaluate a hypothesis based on existent information/data. Focus ideas: It is difficult to prove the truth of a scientific hypothesis but it is possible to compare the distinct hypotheses involved in rival explanations of the same event. The criteria that can be used in making judgments about the reliability of a hypothesis to a scientific explanation include: • Relevance • Testability • Compatibility with known science concepts/laws/principles • Good Predictive Power • Simplicity Activity 1 Part I of Ignaz Semmelweis’ Discovery to the cause of Childbed Fever Ignaz Semmelweis was a doctor who worked in an Italian Hospital in 1840s. He noticed that many women died shortly after labouring in the ward (first ward) he and his colleagues were working. He called this phenomenon as “childbed fever” (產褥熱). He observed that the death rate due to childbed fever in the first ward was higher than that of the second ward attended only by midwifery students (Ignaz Semmelweis and other doctors did not help with the delivery of maternity patients in this ward) in the hospital for 3 consecutive years. The death rates of the maternity patients in the first and second ward of the hospital were as follows: Death rate of maternity patients after child birth in the first ward 1844 8.2% 1845 6.8% 1846 11.4% (Reference: Carl G. Hempel (1966)) Death rate of maternity patients after child birth in the second ward 2.3% 2.0% 2.7% There were some hypotheses suggested to explain the above observations. You will be divided into groups of 4-5 students. Each group will be required to discuss the possibility of the different hypotheses. You are required to write down your discussion result in the form of a mind map. You may get further information on each hypothesis from the teacher after completion of the mind map. Hypothesis I: Atmospheric Change Hypothesis The cause of the higher rate of childbed fever is due to atmospheric-cosmic changes (大氣變化). Task 1: What other information do you need to know before you agree or disagree on this hypothesis? Write down your discussion result with the aid of a mind map. Task 2 (Your teacher will give you further information after you have completed task 1) [Further information from teacher: It was found that there were no cases of childbed fever in nearby hospitals.] (a). Can this hypothesis be used to explain Semmelweis’ findings? (b). Explain your answer. Hypothesis 2: Crowdedness Hypothesis The cause of the higher rate of childbed fever is due to crowdedness in the first ward. Task 1: What other information do you need to know before you agree or disagree on this hypothesis? Write down your discussion result with the aid of a mind map. P 66 P 67 Task 2 (Your teacher will give you further information after you have completed task 1) [Further information from teacher: Actually, the second ward was more crowded than the first ward since many pregnant mothers were afraid to stay in the first ward due to the higher death rate.] Task 2 (Your teacher will give you further information after you have completed task 1) [Further information from teacher: It was found that the rate of death due to childbed fever in the first ward was still high when the pregnant mothers lay on one’s side in delivery.] (a). Can this hypothesis be used to explain Semmelweis’ findings? (b). Explain your answer. (a). Can this hypothesis be used to explain Semmelweis’ findings? (b). Explain your answer. Hypothesis 3: “Rude Manner In Examination” Hypothesis The cause of the higher rate of childbed fever in the first ward was due to the rude manner of medical students when they examined the pregnant mothers between deliveries. Part II of Ignaz Semmelweis’ Discovery to the cause of Childbed Fever Task 1: What other information do you need to know before you agree or disagree on this hypothesis? Write down your discussion result with the aid of a mind map. A colleague of Semmelweis, Professor Kolletschka cut his own finger with a scalpel by accident when he was performing an autopsy. Such accidents happened quite often among doctors during deliveries. Professor Kolletschka developed symptoms similar to childbed fever later and died. Group Discussion Task 2 (Your teacher will give you further information after you have completed task 1) [Further information from teacher: (i) It was found that the wound due to the rude manner in the examination between deliveries was usually less serious when compared with the wound due to the labouring process. (ii) When the number of medical students was cut to a half, it was found that the death rate due to childbed fever in the first ward dropped initially but it eventually increased as high as before. (a) If you were Semmelweis, what would you think? (any causal relationship between the accident and Professor Kolletschka’s death) (a). Can this hypothesis be used to explain Semmelweis’ findings? (b). Explain your answer. Semmelweis thought that it was the cadaveric matter in the corpse that entered the blood of Professor Kolletschka infecting him with childbed fever. Hypothesis 4: “Position In Delivery” Hypothesis The cause of the higher rate of childbed fever in the first ward was due to the supine position (lying flat on the back, face upwards) of pregnant mothers in deliveries. cadaveric matterscalpel feverdeath Task 1: What other information do you need to know before you agree or disagree on this hypothesis? Write down your discussion result with the aid of a mind map. P 68 (b) Can you suggest a hypothesis to explain his death? (c)What evidence was needed to support the cause in (b)? Part III of Ignaz Semmelweis’ Discovery to the cause of Childbed Fever blood of professor Kolletschka childbed Testing of his own Hypothesis: Semmlweis then instituted a strict policy in the first ward. Semmlweis, his colleagues and medical students used chlorinated lime water to wash their hands prior to attending patients. The death rate of maternity patients dropped from 18.3% to 1.3% in 1848 and was even lower than that of the second ward (death rate: 1.33%). We call the cadaveric matter ‘bacteria’ nowadays. P 69 Activity 2: (reference: Learning from TIMSS (2006)) Procedure: (a). Light up three candles of different lengths (tall, medium, short). (b). Predict the going out sequence of the candle flame when the three burning candles are covered with a bell jar as shown in the diagram below: Activity 3 Write down the logic of testing a hypothesis (Home Assignment). Suggested answers: Testing the Hypotheses We can test scientific hypotheses by considering their implications and then use experiments or observation to test those implications. Let H be the hypothesis and I be the implication. Type 1 Hypothesis 1. If H is right, then I would happen. (If H, then I) 2. I is not observed. (Not I ) 3. So H is not right. (So, not H) (c). Cover the three burning candles with a bell jar. (d). Observe what happens and write down the results. Remarks: The flame of the tallest candle would go out first, then the medium size and finally the shortest one. The reason is that burning of the candles would produce carbon dioxide and the heat evolved would heat up carbon dioxide that rises upwards due to smaller density. The accumulation of a large amount of carbon dioxide at the top of the bell jar would put out the candle flame of the tallest candle first. (e). Suggest a hypothesis to explain the above observation. Write down the steps to test your hypothesis. Then carry out the experiment if possible and see whether your hypothesis is right or wrong. If it is wrong, you need to think of a new hypothesis and test it again. P 70 The observation and experiment in Type 1 Hypothesis refute the hypothesis. Deduction is widely used in scientific reasoning. Illustration of Type I Hypothesis Hypothesis: Virus X would infect people through air transmission. Implication: People would be infected with virus X if they talk to each other. It is found that it is not the case that people became infected with virus X after talking to each other. Type 2 Hypothesis 1. If H is right, then I would happen. (If H, then I) 2. I is observed. (I ) 3. So H is right. (So, H) P 71 Type 2 pattern of reasoning affirms the consequent arguments. The observation and experiment in Type 2 Hypothesis confirm with the hypothesis H. However, the arguments in type 2 are not deductively valid. Illustration of Type 2 Hypothesis If dogs urinate in the street, then the streets are wet. The streets are wet. Therefore, dogs urinated. The above argument does not prove that dogs urinated. It might be the case but might be some naughty boy did so. Scientists always put up a hypothesis, deduce implications from the hypothesis, test the implications by experiments and find out whether the experimental result confirms or refutes the hypothesis. Due to the reason as exemplified by illustration of Type 2 Hypothesis scientists can never be 100 percent certain that a scientific hypothesis is true. Scientific conclusions are always tentative and open to revision or correction. However, scientific conclusions can be affirmed with a high degree of confidence by means of carefully controlled experiments. Students’ Worksheet Lesson 3Testing a Hypothesis Activity 1 Part I of Ignaz Semmelweis’ Discovery to the cause of Childbed Fever Ignaz Semmelweis was a doctor who worked in an Italian Hospital in 1840s. He noticed that many women died shortly after childbirth in the ward (first ward) he and his colleagues were working. He called this phenomenon as “childbed fever” (產褥熱). He observed that the death rate due to childbed fever in the first ward was higher than that of the second ward attended only by midwifery students (Ignaz Semmelweis and other doctors did not help with the delivery of maternity patients in this ward) in the hospital for 3 consecutive years. The death rates of the maternity patients in the first and second ward of the hospital were as follows: Year Death rate of maternity patients after child birth in the first ward 1844 1845 1846 8.2% 6.8% 11.4% (Reference: Carl G. Hempel (1966)) Death rate of maternity patients after child birth in the second ward 2.3% 2.0% 2.7% There were some hypotheses suggested to explain the above observations. You will be divided into groups of 4-5 students. Each group will be required to discuss the possibility of the different hypotheses. You are required to write down your discussion result in the form of a mind map. You may get further information on each hypothesis from the teacher after completion of the mind map. Hypothesis I: Atmospheric Change Hypothesis The cause of the higher rate of childbed fever is due to atmospheric-cosmic changes (大氣變化). P 72 P 73 Task 1: What other information do you need to know before you agree or disagree on this hypothesis? Write down your discussion result with the aid of a mind map. Hypothesis 2: Crowdedness Hypothesis The cause of the higher rate of childbed fever is due to crowdedness in the first ward. Task 1: What other information do you need to know before you agree or disagree on this hypothesis? Write down your discussion result with the aid of a mind map. Task 2 (Your teacher will give you further information after you have completed task 1) (a). Can this hypothesis be used to explain Semmelweis’ findings? (b). Explain your answer. P 74 Task 2 (Your teacher will give you further information after you have completed task 1) (a). Can this hypothesis be used to explain Semmelweis’ findings? (a). Explain your answer. P 75 Hypothesis 3: “Rude Manner In Examination” Hypothesis The cause of the higher rate of childbed fever in the first ward was due to the rude manner of medical students when they examined the pregnant mothers between deliveries. Task 1: What other information do you need to know before you agree or disagree at this hypothesis? Write down your discussion result with the aid of a mind map. Task 2 (Your teacher will give you further information after you have completed task 1) (a). Can this hypothesis be used to explain Semmelweis’ findings? (b). Explain your answer. P 76 Hypothesis 4: “Position In Delivery” Hypothesis The cause of the higher rate of childbed fever in the first ward was due to the supine position (lying flat on the back, face upwards) of pregnant mothers in delivery. Task 1: What other information do you need to know before you agree or disagree at this hypothesis? Write down your discussion result with the aid of a mind map. Task 2 (Your teacher will give you further information after you have completed task 1) (a). Can this hypothesis be used to explain Semmelweis’ findings? (b). Explain your answer. P 77 Part II of Ignaz Semmelweis’ Discovery to the cause of Childbed Fever One colleague of Semmelweis, professor Kolletschka cut his own finger with a scalpel by accident when he was performing an autopsy. Such accidents happened quite often among doctors between deliveries. Professor Kolletschka developed symptoms similar to childbed fever later and died. Group Discussion Activity 2: (reference: Learning from TIMSS (2006)) Procedure: (a). Light up three candles of different lengths (tall, medium, short). (b). Predict the going out sequence of the candle flame when the three burning candles are covered with a bell jar as shown in the diagram below: (a) If you were Semmelweis, what would you think? (any causal relationship between the accident and professor Kolletschka’s death) (b) Can you suggest a hypothesis to explain his death? (c)What evidence was needed to support the hypothesis in (b)? (c). Cover the three burning candles with a bell jar. (d). Observe what happens and write down the results. Part III of Ignaz Semmelweis’ Discovery to the cause of Childbed Fever (Teacher will discuss the final part of the story with the students) (e). Suggest a hypothesis to explain the above observation. Write down the steps to test your hypothesis. Then carry out the experiment if possible and see whether your hypothesis is right or wrong. If it is wrong, you need to think of a new hypothesis and test it again. P 78 P 79 Student Products Activity 3 Write down the logic of testing a hypothesis. Mind Map of the “Atmospheric Change”Hypothesis Ignaz Semmelweis’ Discovery to the cause of Childbed Fever Mind Map of the “Rude Manner in Examination” Hypothesis Mind Map of the “Crowdedness” Hypothesis Mind Map of the “Position in Delivery” Hypothesis P 80 P 81 Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities Lesson 4Experimental Designs Level of Students: S.1-S.2 Learning Objectives Students will: have an understanding of the 3 types of causal experiments, Randomized Design, Prospective Design and Retrospective Design commonly used in scientific researches; be able to identify the type of experimental design being used in the establishment of causal links; be able to know the pros and cons of the 3 types of causal experiments. Focus ideas: There are 3 types of causal experiments, Randomized Design, Prospective Design and Retrospective Design commonly used in scientific researches. Each of them has pros and cons. We need to be careful when we come across many “research findings” in the media (e.g. newspaper and the internet). We should be critical about their experimental designs and interpret the “research findings” with great care. Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities: Lesson 4 Experimental Designs Time Remarks allocation Approx. 90 min. Activity 1 25 min. (Randomized Experimental Design) (a). The focus of this activity is to enhance students’ understanding of the Randomized Experimental Design including the advantages and disadvantages (including the fact that if a scientist wants to study the effect of a certain poison on humans, he/ she is not allowed to choose an experimental and control group at random from a large population) of the design. (b). Students need to be reminded about the importance of selecting samples at random from a large population, otherwise the results obtained may not be conclusive. Activity 2 30 min. (Prospective Experimental Design) (a). The focus of this activity is to let students understand the application of Prospective Experimental Design in scientific research and the pros and cons of the design. (b). A good prospective design can strongly indicate a causal link though not as strongly as can a randomized design. Activity 3 20 min. (Retrospective Experimental Design) (a).The focus of this activity is to let students understand the application of Retrospective Experimental Design in scientific research and the pros and cons of the design. (b). Students should note that even the best retrospective studies provide only weak evidence for a causal link because other potential causal factors may influence the experimental and control group (extremely difficult to control). Since students may come across many research findings concerning humans in their daily life, activities resembling clinical studies are used in this lesson to enhance students’ motivation to learn. Suggested Lesson Time: 90 min. Prior knowledge of students: Students should have learnt the design of a simple investigation involving dependent variable, independent variables and control variables. They also know the validity of an experimental design depends on the construction of a fair test. The teacher may ask the students a few related questions to check their understanding on such concepts. Exercise P 82 The students are divided into groups of 4-5 members to carry out the activities. 15 min. P 83 PowerPoint Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context Activity 1 Lesson 4 Experimental Design 1. A scientist, Dr. Chan, wants to design an experiment to investigate the following topic: The effect of taking a nap (a short sleep during the day) on longevity Activity 2: Randomised Experimental Design can provide strong evidence to support an hypothesis because other possible causal factors are controlled in the experimental design. every day) and those who seldom eat fruits (eating fruits less than three times a week). The former became the experimental group and the latter became the control group. He found that the number of students in the experimental group outnumbered the number of students in the control group. He then pared down the size of the experimental group so that the numbers of students in the experimental and control group were the same. Task : He then sent another questionnaire to them to gather information from them on their frequency of getting cold in the following 6 months. What are the advantages of this kind of experimental design (Randomised Experimental Design) in scientific investigation? 4. Please comment on the difficulties Dr Chan may face if he carries out his research according to your design. Expensive and time-consuming (for years) to carry out the experiment; Must involve a large number of subjects for the experiment in order to have statistically significant results; Must keep other variables constant (fair test) but in reality it is difficult to control. P 84 1. Use a flow chart to illustrate the above experimental design. 2. The experimental design in (1) is called Prospective Experimental Design. What are its special features? 3. What are the advantages of Prospective Experimental Design over Randomised Experimental Design? 4. What are the limitations of this kind of experimental design? 5. The experimental design in (1) is called Prospective Experimental Design. What are the special features of the Prospective Experimental Design? Remarks: Dr. Chan wanted to investigate the link between eating fruits and immunity from cold. He selected 5000 students randomly from 500 secondary schools in Hong Kong. Then he sent questionnaires to these students to collect information about their eating habits. He divided them into 2 groups: those who eat fruits regularly (eating fruits Activity 2: Please comment on the difficulties Dr Chan may face if he carries out his research according to your design. 3. Please design an experiment to study this research topic using a control group and an experimental group. (Use a flow chart / mind map to show your experimental design). Activity 1 2. 5. What are the advantages of this kind of experimental design (Randomised Experimental Design) in Scientific Investigation? If a scientist wants to study the effect of a certain poison on humans, he/she is not allowed to choose an experimental and control group at random from a large population. P 85 The subjects who have been exposed to the suspected cause (eating fruits regularly in (1)) are selected for the experimental group while the subjects of the control group who have not been exposed to the suspected cause (eating fruits less often) are selected for the control group. 6. What are the advantages of Prospective Experimental Design over Randomised Experimental Design? 7. What are the limitations of this kind of experimental design? Easier and less expensive to carry out the study/experiment May avoid ethical objections Can pool data from very large group of subjects thus increasing the accuracy of the experimental result The selection process of experimental and control group usually focuses on one single causal factor, hence it is possible that other factors will come into play at the very early stage of the selection process (i.e. the selected subjects having the suspected cause already affected by other factor(s)). 3. What would the result of Dr. X’s be if acupuncture treatment can prolong the life span of patients with last stage liver cancer? 4. What are the pros and cons of Retrospective Experimental Design? (i) The advantages of retrospective experimental design are that it is quick and inexpensive. We only need to analyse the data of past research/study carefully. We may look for the percentage difference (life span) between the experimental and control group. If there is a higher and significant % of patients who can still live after 1 year in the experimental group than that of the control group, the study may support the causal link between acupuncture and (ii) The disadvantages of retrospective experimental design are as follows: Can only provide weak evidence for a causal link because there may be other potential causal factors which are difficult to control in this kind of experimental design (these potential causal factors other than the one to be tested for may automatically be built in the experimental and control group). Furthermore, retrospective experimental design cannot estimate the level of difference of the effect being studied. prolonging of life span of patients with last stage liver cancer. Reference: Stephen S. Carey (1998) Retrospective Design. Another Design involves the collection of data prior to the setting of the objectives and design of the research. The data can be abstracted from past studies or researches. This kind of design is called Retrospective Design. Retrospective Design: to find the Cause and Effect from past data and researches. Key terms: Suspected Cause (independent variable) Suspected Effect (dependent variable) Experimental group: a group of subjects chosen from the population with the suspected effect (or with improvement after treatment) Control group: a group of subjects chosen from the population without the suspected effect (or without improvement after treatment) Inhalation of air with high oxygen concentration enhances memory Exercise: Activity 3 Task : P 86 1. What would the result of Dr. X’s study be if acupuncture treatment can prolong the life span of patients with last stage liver cancer? 2. What are the pros and cons of Retrospective Experimental Design? Read the following news and answer the questions: Question: 1. 2. Name the experimental design used by company X. Comment on the experimental result and judge the reliability of the research findings. P 87 A Japanese electric appliance company X conducted a research and claimed that inhalation of air with high oxygen concentration can enhance memory. 80 students were divided into 2 groups. They were required to take a test on English vocabulary. Then the experimental group of students inhaled air of high concentration of oxygen while the control group breathed ordinary air. Both groups of students were allowed to have some revision before taking the same vocabulary test again. It was found that the experimental group could memorise the vocabulary items 15% more than that of the control group. Teachers’ Reference Activity 1 Lesson 4Experimental Designs A scientist, Dr. Chan, wants to design an experiment to investigate the following topic: Learning Objectives The effect of taking a nap (a short sleep during the day) on longevity Students will: 1. Please design an experiment to study this research topic using a control group and an experimental group. (Use a flow chart / mind map to show your experimental design). have an understanding of the 3 types of causal experiments commonly used in scientific researches, Randomised Design, Prospective Design and Retrospective Design; be able to identify the type of experimental design being used in the establishment of causal links; be able to know the pros and cons of the 3 types of causal experiments. Note: The subjects of this study / experiment will be selected and randomly divided into two groups prior to administering the suspected causal agent (sleep). Suggested Lesson Time: 90 min. P 88 P 89 2. Please comment on the difficulties Dr Chan may face if he carries out his research according to your design. Teachers’ Reference Randomised Experiemental Design Expensive and time-consuming (for years) to carry out the experiment; Must involve a large number of subjects for the experiment in order to have statistically significant results Must keep other variables constant (fair test) but in reality it is difficult to control. Whole population e.g. Humans/animals/plants Remarks: If a scientist wants to study the effect of a certain poison on humans, he/she is not allowed to choose an experimental and control group at random from a large population. Select some samples at random as experiment targets 3. What are the advantages of this kind of experimental design (Randomised Experimental Design) in scientific investigation? Randomised Experimental Design can provide strong evidence to support an hypothesis because other possible causal factors are controlled in the experimental design. Control Group Experimental Group (suspected cause) suspected cause No Contact with the suspected cause Have contact with the suspected cause Activity 2: Dr. Chan wanted to investigate the link between eating fruits and immunity from cold. He selected 5000 students randomly from 500 secondary schools in Hong Kong. Then he sent questionnaires to these students to collect information about their eating habits. He divided them into 2 groups: those who eat fruits regularly (eating fruits every day) and those who seldom eat fruits (eating fruits less than three times a week). The former became the experimental group and the latter became the control group. He found that the number of students in the experimental group outnumbered the number of students in the control group. He then pared down the size of the experimental group so that the numbers of students in the experimental and control group were the same. He then sent another questionnaire to them to gather information from them on their frequency of getting cold in the following 6 months. Check Result Credit: Stephens S. Carev. A Beginner’s Guide to Scientific Method (1998) P 90 Check Result P 91 2. The experimental design in (1) is called Prospective Experimental Design. What are its special features? Task 1. Use a flow chart to illustrate the above experimental design The subjects who have been exposed to the suspected cause (eating fruits regularly in (1)) are selected for the experimental group while the subjects of the control group who have not been exposed to the suspected cause (eating fruits less often) are selected for the control group. Prospective Experimental Design Whole Population e.g. Humans/animals/plants The others have contact with the suspected cause. As targets for Preliminary Experimental Group Some members have no contact with the suspected cause. 3. What are the advantages of Prospective Experimental Design over Randomised Experimental Design? Credit: Stephen S. Carev. A Beginner’s Guide to Scientific Method (1998) As targets for Preliminary Control Group Easier and less expensive to carry out the study/experiment; May avoid ethical objections; Can pool data from very large group of subjects, thus increasing the accuracy of the experimental result. 4. What are the limitations of this kind of experimental design? The selection process of experimental and control group usually focuses on one single causal factor, hence it is possible that other factors will come into play at the very early stage of the selection process (i.e. the selected subjects having the suspected cause already affected by other factor(s)). Adjustment e.g. Pare down the size of the larger group by randomly excluding subjects from it. As Final Experimental Group As Final Control Group Check Result Check Result P 92 P 93 Activity 3 Another Design involves the collection of data prior to the setting of the objectives of the research and the design of the research. The data can be abstracted from past studies or researches. This kind of design is called Retrospective Design. Retrospective Experimental Design Whole population e.g. Humans/animals/plants Retrospective Design: to find the Cause and Effect from past data and researches. Key terms: Suspected Cause (independent variable) Suspected Effect (dependent variable) Experimental group: a group of subjects chosen from the population with the suspected effect (or with improvement after treatment) Control group: a group of subjects chosen from the population without the suspected effect (or without improvement after treatment) Targets without Suspected Cause Targets with Suspected Cause Study the records of past Research/Study that may have connection with the Suspected Cause. Look to the past the Experimental Method/ Treatment Look to the past the Experimental Method/ Treatment Compare the data to see whether there are differences of potential causal factors Provide data/ information to the new Research / Study Credit: Stephen S. Carev. A Beginner’s Guide to Scientific Method (1998) P 94 P 95 Dr. X wants to use Retrospective Design to carry out a research on the relationship between acupuncture and the prolonging of life span of patients with last stage liver cancer. The following flow chart shows his experimental design: Suspected CauseΚacupuncture Suspected effect: prolonging of life span of patients with last stage liver cancer Retrospective Design Population Research on the effect of acupuncture on the prolonging of life span of patients with last stage of liver cancer Patients with acupuncture treatment Patients without acupuncture treatment (suspected cause) 1. What would the result of Dr. X’s study be if acupuncture treatment can prolong the life span of patients with last stage liver cancer? We may look for the percentage difference (life span) between the experimental and control group. If there is a higher and significant percentage of patients who can still live after 1 year in the experimental group than that of the control group, the study may support the causal link between acupuncture and prolonging of life span of patients with last stage liver cancer. 2. What are the pros and cons of Retrospective Experimental Design? The advantages of retrospective experimental design are that it is quick and inexpensive. We only need to analyse the data of past research/study carefully. retrospection retrospection Task: ᡖጊڂ The disadvantages of retrospective experimental design are as follows: It can only provide weak evidence for a causal link because there may be other potential causal factors which are difficult to control in this kind of experimental design (these potential causal factors other than the one to be tested for may automatically be built in the experimental and control group). Furthermore, retrospective experimental design cannot estimate the level of difference of the effect being studied. Reference: Stephen S. Carey (1998) Experimental group Control group % of patients still alive % of patients still alive after 1 year after 1 year P 96 P 97 Exercise: Students’ Worksheet Read the following news and answer the questions: Lesson 4Experimental Designs Inhalation of air with high oxygen concentration enhances memory A Japanese electric appliance Company X conducted a research and claimed that inhalation of air with high oxygen concentration can enhance memory. 80 students were divided into 2 groups. They were required to take a test on English vocabulary. Then the experimental group of students inhaled air of high concentration of oxygen while the control group breathed ordinary air. Both groups of students were allowed to have some revision before taking the same vocabulary test again. It was found that the experimental group could memorise the vocabulary items 15% more than that of the control group. Activity 1 A scientist, Dr. Chan, wants to design an experiment to investigate the following topic: The effect of taking a nap (a short sleep during the day) on longevity 1. Please design an experiment to study this research topic using a control group and an experimental group. (Use a flow chart / mind map to show your experimental design). 1. Name the experimental design used by Company X. 2. Comment on the experimental result and judge the reliability of the research findings. P 98 P 99 2. Please comment on the difficulties Dr Chan may face if he carries out his research according to your design. Task: 1. Use a flow chart to illustrate the above experimental design. 3. What are the advantages of this kind of experimental design (Randomised Experimental Design) in scientific investigation? Activity 2: Dr. Chan wanted to investigate the link between eating fruits and immunity from cold. He selected 5000 students randomly from 500 secondary schools in Hong Kong. Then he sent questionnaires to these students to collect information about their eating habits. He divided them into 2 groups: those who eat fruits regularly (eating fruits every day) and those who seldom eat fruits (eating fruits less than three times a week). The former became the experimental group and the latter became the control group. He found that the number of students in the experimental group outnumbered the number of students in the control group. He then pared down the size of the experimental group so that the numbers of students in the experimental and control group were the same. He then sent another questionnaire to them to collect information from them on their frequency of getting cold in the following 6 months. P 100 P 101 2. The experimental design in (1) is called Prospective Experimental Design. What are the special features? Activity 3 Another Design involves the collection of data prior to the setting of the objectives and the design of the research. The data can be abstracted from past studies or researches. This kind of design is called Retrospective Design. Retrospective Design: to find the Cause and Effect from past data and researches. 3. What are the advantages of Prospective Experimental Design over Randomised Experimental Design? Key terms: Suspected Cause (independent variable) Suspected Effect (dependent variable) Experimental group: a group of subjects chosen from the population with the suspected effect (or with improvement after treatment) Control group: a group of subjects chosen from the population without the suspected effect (or without improvement after treatment) 4. What are the limitations of this kind of experimental design? P 102 P 103 Dr. X wants to use Retrospective Design to carry out a research on the relationship between acupuncture and the prolonging of life span of patients with last stage liver cancer. The following flow chart shows his experimental design: Retrospective Experimental Design Whole population e.g. Humans/animals/plants Targets without Suspected Cause Targets with Suspected Cause Study the records of past Research/Study that may have connection with the Suspected Cause. Suspected CauseΚacupuncture Suspected effect: prolonging of life span of patients with last stage liver cancer Retrospective Design Population Research on the effect of acupuncture on the prolonging of life span of patients with last stage of liver cancer Look to the past the Experimental Method/ Treatment Look to the past the Experimental Method/ Treatment retrospection retrospection Patients with acupuncture treatment (suspected cause) Patients without acupuncture treatment ᡖጊڂ Compare the data to see whether there are differences of potential causal factors Experimental group Control group Provide data/ information to the new Research / Study % of patients still alive % of patients still alive after 1 year after 1 year Credit: Stephen S. Carev. A Beginner’s Guide to Scientific Method (1998) P 104 P 105 Task: Exercise: 1. What would the result of Dr. X’s study be if acupuncture treatment can prolong the life span of patients with last stage liver cancer? Read the following news and answer the questions: Inhalation of air with high oxygen concentration enhances memory A Japanese electric appliance Company X conducted a research and claimed that inhalation of air with high oxygen concentration can enhance memory. 80 students were divided into 2 groups. They were required to take a test on English vocabulary. Then the experimental group of students inhaled air of high concentration of oxygen while the control group breathed ordinary air. Both groups of students were allowed to have some revision before taking the same vocabulary test again. It was found that the experimental group could memorise the vocabulary items 15% more than that of the control group. 2. What are the pros and cons of Retrospective Experimental Design? 1. Name the experimental design used by Company X. 2. Comment on the experimental result and judge the reliability of the research findings. P 106 P 107 Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities PowerPoint Lesson 5 Double-blind Design in Randomized Experimental Design Level of Students: S.1-S.2 Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context Lesson 5 Learning Objectives Activity 1 Students will: understand the rationale of using Double-blind Design, including the use of placebo in Randomised Experimental Design; be able to evaluate an experimental design using a placebo. DoubleDouble-blind Design in Randomised Experimental Design To study the effect of coffee on humans’ humans’ concentration power 2 1 Suggested Lesson Time: 90 min.x 2 = 180 min. Prior knowledge of students: Students learnt the Randomised Experimental Design in the last lesson. The teacher may ask the students a few related questions to check their understanding on such concepts. Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities: Lesson 5 Double-blind Design in Randomised Experimental Design Activity 1 (Randomised Experimental Design) Class Discussion of Experimental Result Time allocation Approx. 180 min. (2 periods) 90 min. (1st period) Materials and apparatus • 1 packet of coffee A Remarks • 1 packet of coffee B • Enough hot water (at 800C ) for about 45 paper cups (half full) The students are divided into groups of 4-5 members to carry out the activities. (a). The focus of this activity is to let students experience an experimental design with a placebo so that they can understand what a double-blind design is. (b). The teacher must keep the students from knowing that coffee B is decaffeinated coffee until the end of the second counting experiment. (c). It is better to obtain class data of several classes for better comparison. 90 min. (a). The focus of the discussion is on the validity (2nd period) of the experimental design and students are required to comment on the validity of method, ways of data treatment and whether the class data can provide conclusive evidence to support the hypothesis that coffee may enhance the concentration power of humans. (b). Students are also required to suggest ways to improve the experimental design. (c). Students should know the rationale of using double-blind design in scientific researches. • 1 bottle of coffee creamer Hypothesis: • 50 spoons • 1 bag of red rice (net weight: 1.5 kg) Coffee may enhance the concentration power of humans. • 1 bag of white rice (net weight: 2 kg) • 45 Petri dishes • 45 Heat resistant paper cups 3 4 Procedure: a) The class is randomly divided into three groups(A, B and C), each each of which consisting of roughly the same number of students. Group A: coffee A + coffee creamer [Drink A] b) Each of you will be given a Petri dish containing wellwell-mixed red and white rice in the ratio 2:1 (approx.). c) Each of you is required to pick out the red rice from the white rice by hand at constant speed. d) Each of you is required to record down the number of red rice picked up in five minutes. e) Record down the total no. of red rice picked up by the different groups of students in five minutes. f) Then each group will be given drinks according to their group number immediately after step (e): (e): (3 spoonful of coffee A + 2 spoonful of coffee creamer + half cup of hot water (800C) + stirring) Group B: coffee B + coffee creamer [Drink B] (3 spoonful of coffee B + 2 spoonful of coffee creamer + half cup of hot water (800C) + stirring) Group C: water + coffee creamer [Drink C] (2 spoonful of coffee creamer + half cup of hot water (800C) + stirring) 6 5 P 108 P 109 Procedure: Result Group A (Taken Drink A) (g) Thirty minutes after taking the drink each of you will be required to repeat steps (b), (c), (d) and (e). First counting experiment before taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes Student 8 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 13 Result Group B (Taken Drink B) Student 9 10 First counting experiment before taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes Student 15 P 110 Second counting experiment after taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes 16 Task: 1. Why was the experiment repeated? (i.e. why do we need to do the first counting experiment and then do the second experiment? ) 12 First counting experiment before taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes 1 2 3 4 5 6 Task: 11 14 Result Group C (Taken Drink C) Second counting experiment after taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes 1 2 3 4 5 6 Second counting experiment after taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes 2. Why was the second experiment carried out 30 minutes after taking the drink? 17 18 P 111 Task: Discussion of Experimental Results Task: 4.Compare the results of group A, B and C obtained from (3). Does the result obtained support the hypothesis that coffee may enhance the concentration power of humans? Please explain your answers. 3. Pool the group and class data after the experiment. You may need to do some calculation in order to obtain more conclusive result. Show the details of your treatment of the class data. Average of Percentage Increase of Mean (Class 2A and 2C) a) Standard deviation indicates how spread out a set of data is, that is, whether the data are relatively close together and clustered around the mean or spread out. b) Referring to the standard deviation difference of Class 2A, 2B and 2C the difference in standard deviation of Class 2B is the greatest for Drink A and Drink B, which makes the data collected in class 2B not so trustworthy. However, the differences in standard deviation of class 2A and 2C are reasonable. Hence, the result of Class 2B was discarded but the results of Class 2A and 2C are combined to see whether there is any significant evidence for drawing a conclusion. Class data obtained from 2A, 2B, 2C Compare the results and try to draw a conclusion. Control Drink A Drink B 16.6% 22% 39.3% If set 0, (slightly greater than 5.4 that of the Control) 24 P 112 22% 39.3% If set 0, 5.4 22.7 Drink B is decaffeinated coffee • • It contains nearly no caffeine (only 0.1% caffeine). It was supposed to be used as a placebo. 22.7 27 28 A DoubleDouble-blind Study A DoubleDouble-blind Study 23 16.6% (much greater than that of the Control and of the “Drink A” group) 22 21 Drink B 26 Average of Percentage Increase of Mean (Class 2A and 2C) The following data of the above experiment was obtained from 3 classes (105 Secondary 2 students) of a school. Drink A 25 20 19 Control • A double-blind study, relatively easy to achieve in drug studies, belongs to the category of Randomised Experimental Design. Two similar groups of people (experimental and control) act as targets of the study. The experimental group is given an actual treatment (e.g. an investigational drug) while the control group is given a placebo (may be a sugar pill), which has identical appearance (e.g. colour, taste, size) as the investigational drug. • A placebo is a preparation which is pharmacologically inert but which may have a medical effect solely on the power of suggestion, a response known as the placebo effect. • Furthermore, people are randomly assigned to the control or experimental group and given random numbers by a study co-ordinator, who also encodes the investigative drug and the placebo with matching random numbers. Neither the experimental subjects (both the control and experimental group) nor the researchers monitoring the outcome of the study know who is receiving which treatment (the investigative drug or the placebo), until the study is over and the random code is broken. Such an arrangement would prevent the subjects from biasing the result by knowing which group they are in. 30 29 P 113 • • Teachers’ Reference Average of Percentage Increase of Mean (Class 2A and 2C) A DoubleDouble-blind Study If later it is found that results from the experimental group is better than that of the control group, the treatment or the drug given to the experimental group is assumed to have an effect. Control Drink A Drink B 16.6% 22% 39.3% If set 0, 5.4 (slightly greater than that of the Control) 22.7 (much greater than that of the Control and of the “Drink A” group) Drank coffee during the experiment Drank decaffeinated (only 0.1% caffeine) coffee during the experiment Finally, the same experiment (study) need to be replicated on a large group of subjects in order that more significant conclusion can be drawn about the effect of the investigative drug. Lesson 5 Learning Objectives Implication: The result obtained from the Control, Drink A Group and Drink B Group is not conclusive ((a) The result of Drink A group is only slightly greater than that of the Control (not a significant difference); (b) The placebo effect of Drink B Group should not be so great when compared with Drink A Group and the Control). 31 Double-blind design in randomised experimental design 32 Students will: understand the rationale of using Double-blind Design, including the use of placebo in Randomised Experimental Design; be able to evaluate an experimental design using a placebo. Focus ideas: The double-blinded method is commonly used in scientific researches because it can prevent research findings from being influenced by the placebo effect and the bias of the scientists. Blinded research is an important tool in many research domains such as medicine and forensic science. Discussion Questions 1) Is the experimental design a double-blind design? Explain your answer. 2) Is the experimental design a valid design? Explain your answer. 3) If the experimental design is not a valid one, suggest ways to improve the experimental design? 1) Is the experimental design a double-blind design? Explain your answer. The experimental design is a single-blind, not a double-blind because the teacher knows the details of the drink and which group of students would take which drink. 33 34 3) If the experimental design is not a valid one, suggest ways to improve the experimental design? 2) Is the experimental design a valid design? Explain your answer. Ways to improve the experimental design may be as follows: Judging from the Percentage Increase (Mean) of Drink A, B and the Control of Class 2A and 2C the experimental design is not a valid design. Possible reasons may be as follows: • • • • • Key terms related to double-blinded method: Experimental group Control group (taking a placebo) Randomisation Replication Suggested answers: • • The sample size is too small; The suggested method is not a valid method to measure the concentration power of humans; Some students may drink coffee during lunch or breakfast and hence may interfere with the experimental result Some students are more skillful at doing such task requiring good motor skills; The effect of coffee is not significant because the “dose” is not enough. • • • • 35 P 114 To increase the sample size (invite more classes to do the experiment); To use another method to measure the concentration power of the experimental subjects, e.g. Use photographic memory method (eidetic imagery, in which a person memorises details of a complex scene at a glance) to measure the concentration power of the experimental subjects Scattered numerals would appear for up to two-thirds of a second in the computer screen and were then masked by white squares. Each student is required to write down the numerals on a worksheet according to their previous location within a fifth of a second. The same procedure with 10 different sets of numerals repeats for 10 times and the students would check the answers after the activity. The percent accuracy of each student is counted and then the sum, the mean, percentage increase, standard deviation are collected for comparison among the three groups of students drinking the control, 36 drink A and drink B.as before. A double-blind study, which is relatively easy to achieve in drug studies, belongs to the category of Randomised Experimental Design. Two similar groups of people (experimental and control) are studied. The experimental group is given an actual treatment (e.g. an investigational drug) while the control group is given a placebo (may be a sugar pill), which has identical appearance (e.g. colour, taste, size) as the investigational drug. A placebo is a preparation, which is pharmacologically inert, may have a medical effect solely on the power of suggestion and such a response is known as the placebo effect. People are randomly assigned to the control or experimental group and given random numbers by a study co-ordinator, who also encodes the investigative drug and the placebo with matching random numbers. Neither the experiment subjects (both the control and experimental group) nor the researchers monitoring the outcome of the study know the treatment both groups are receiving (the investigative drug or the placebo), until the study is over and the random code is broken. Such an arrangement would prevent the subjects from biasing the result by knowing which group they are in. P 115 If later it is found that the results from the experimental group is better than that of the control group, the treatment or the drug given to the experimental group is assumed to have an effect. Finally, the same experiment (study) needs to be replicated on a large group of subjects so that a more significant conclusion can be drawn about the effect of the investigative drug. Suggested Lesson Time: 90 min.x 2 = 180 min. Activity 1 Objective: To study the effect of coffee on humans’ concentration power. Hypothesis: Coffee may enhance the concentration power of humans. Materials and apparatuses 1 packet of coffee (coffee A) 1 packet of decaffeinated coffee (coffee B) Enough hot water (at 800C ) for about 45 paper cups (half full) 1 bottle of coffee creamer 50 spoons 1 bag of red rice (net weight: 1.5 kg) 1 bag of white rice (net weight: 2 kg) 45 Petri dishes 45 Heat resistant paper cups Teachers should note that some students may be sensitive or allergic to coffee. Such students are not advised to join the coffee drinking group and they may join the control group instead. Procedure: (a) The class is randomly divided into three groups (A, B and C), each of which consisting of roughly the same number of students. (b) Each of you will be given a Petri dish containing well-mixed red and white rice in the ratio 2:1 (approx.). (c) Each of you is required to pick out the red rice from the white rice by hand at constant speed. (d) Each of you is required to record down the number of red rice picked up in five minutes. (e) Record down the total no. of red rice picked up by the different groups of students in five minutes. (f) Then each group will be given drinks according to their group number immediately after step (e): Group A: coffee A + coffee creamer [Drink A] (3 spoonful of coffee A + 2 spoonful of coffee creamer + half cup of hot water (80℃) + stirring) Group B: coffee B + coffee creamer [Drink B] (3 spoonful of coffee B + 2 spoonful of coffee creamer + half cup of hot water (80℃) + stirring) Group C: water + coffee creamer [Drink C] (2 spoonful of coffee creamer + half cup of hot water (80℃) + stirring) Remarks for preparation of drinks: The white rice and the red rice would be mixed thoroughly according to the ratio 2:1 Each Petri dish is filled 1/3 full with the mixture of white and red rice. Coffee A is blended soluble coffee containing no glucose syrups. Coffee creamer contains glucose syrups to add flavour to the coffee. (g). Thirty minutes after taking the drink each of you will be required to repeat steps (b), (c), (d) and (e). Remarks: If the students are required to prepare the drinks themselves, the teacher needs to show the students what a full spoonful of coffee is so as to keep the amount of coffee being added to each paper cup the same for group A and B. Safety Precautions: It is better to carry out the drinking experiments in a clean classroom and students should wash their hands before doing the drinking experiment. P 116 P 117 Result Group B (Taken Drink B) Student Group A (Taken Drink A) Student First counting experiment before taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Second counting experiment after taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes First counting experiment before taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Sum Mean Sum Mean P 118 P 119 Second counting experiment after taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes Task: Group C (Taken Drink C) Student First counting experiment before taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Second counting experiment after taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes 1. Why was the experiment repeated? (i.e. why do we need do the first counting experiment and then do the second experiment? ) To minimse the practice effect. 2. Why was the second experiment carried out 30 minutes after taking the drink? It generally takes 15 or more minutes for caffeine to take effect. 3. Pool the group and class data after the experiment. You may need to do some calculation in order to obtain a more conclusive result. Show the details of your treatment of the class data. Each group of students may calculate Mean, Standard Deviation of the counts before and after the experiment % increase of the Mean of each group the difference between the Standard Deviation before and after the experiment of each group 4. Compare the results of group A, B and C obtained from (3). Does the result obtained support the hypothesis that coffee may enhance the concentration power of humans? Please explain your answers. Sum Mean Teacher’s note: If coffee (active ingredient is caffeine) may enhance the concentration power of humans and the experimental design of this activity could really show the effect, there should be valid evidence obtained from the experimental result. If it is so, then the group of students taken coffee (group A) would perform better than the control group (group C) and group B (taken the placebo) students taken the placebo, decaffeinated coffee B (may contain 0.1% caffeine) may perform better than the Control Group showing that a placebo may have an effect based solely on the power of suggestion. Students are required to evaluate whether there is a valid evidence to support the hypothesis by examining the design of the experiment, the collected data (measurement), the way the results are presented, the interpretation of the results. P 120 P 121 Finally, the students should also consider the reliability of the experimental result before drawing the conclusion. If the experimental design is valid, the group taken coffee (with caffeine) is expected to pick out most red rice due to higher concentration power; the group taken decaffeinated coffee (may contain 0.1% caffeine) may also perform better than the control group (though may not be better than the group taken coffee) due to the placebo effect. DON’T tell group B students they are drinking decaffeinated coffee in the course of the experiment. Tell them they are drinking another brand of coffee. The purpose of adding coffee creamer is to make it easier for students to drink the coffee. Some research has shown that drinking coffee will take about 15 minutes to achieve 75% of its maximum effects and one hour to reach its maximum effect. In this experiment the students are required to do the second counting experiment 30 minutes after taking the drink. Students’ Worksheet Lesson 5 Double-blind design in Randomised Experimental Design Activity 1 Objective: To study the effect of coffee on humans’ concentration power. Hypothesis: Coffee may enhance the concentration power of humans. Materials and Apparatuses 1 packet of coffee A 1 packet of coffee B Enough hot water (at 80℃ ) for about 45 paper cups (half full) 1 bottle of coffee creamer 50 spoons 1 bag of red rice (net weight: 1.5 kg) 1 bag of white rice (net weight: 2 kg) 45 Petri dishes 45 Heat resistant paper cups Remarks for preparation of drinks: The white rice and the red rice would be mixed thoroughly according to the ratio 2:1 Each Petri dish is filled 1/3 full with the mixture of white and red rice. Procedures: (a) The class is divided into three groups (A, B and C), each of which consisting of roughly the same number of students. (b) Each of you will be given a Petri dish containing well-mixed red and white rice with the ratio 2:1 (approx.). (c) Each of you is required to pick out the red rice from the white rice by hand at constant speed. (d) Each of you is required to record down the number of red rice picked up in five minutes. (e) Record down the total no. of red rice picked up by the different groups of students in five minutes. P 122 P 123 (f) Then each group will be given drinks according to their group number immediately after step (e): Group A: coffee A + coffee creamer [Drink A] (3 spoonful of coffee A + 2 spoonful of coffee creamer + half cup of hot water (80℃) + stirring) Group B: coffee B + coffee creamer [Drink B] (3 spoonful of coffee B + 2 spoonful of coffee creamer + half cup of hot water (80℃) + stirring) Group C: water + coffee creamer [Drink C] (2 spoonful of coffee creamer + half cup of hot water (80℃) + stirring) (g). Thirty minutes after taking the drink each of you will be required to repeat steps (b), (c), (d) and (e). Result Group A (Taken Drink A) Student First counting experiment before taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Sum Mean P 124 P 125 Second counting experiment after taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes Group C (Taken Drink C) Group B (Taken Drink B) Student First counting experiment before taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Second counting experiment after taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes Student First counting experiment before taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Sum Mean Sum Mean P 126 P 127 Second counting experiment after taking the drink: No. of red rice picked up from a mixture of red and white rice in 5 minutes Task: 1. Why was the experiment repeated? (i.e. why do we need do the first counting experiment and then do the second experiment? ) 4. Compare the results of Group A, B and C obtained from (3). Does the result obtained support the hypothesis that coffee may enhance the concentration power of humans? Please explain your answer. 2. Why was the second experiment carried out immediately after taking the drink? 3. Pool the group and class data after the experiment. You may need to do some calculation in order to obtain more conclusive result. Show the details of your treatment of the class data. P 128 P 129 Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities Activity 3 Redesign the bridge 15 min. The focus of Activity 3 is to let students consolidate what they learn from engineering principles, which in turn enhancing their critical thinking skills. Activity 4 Bridge Building Contest 35 min. The focus of Activity 4 is to encourage students to actively participate in the lesson and let them apply critical thinking skills learned in the Engineering Process. Activity 5 Professional’s judgment 10 min. The focus on doing Activity 5 is to broaden students’ horizon through the expert’s comment on their bridge designs-students need to answer critical questions from the expert and defend their design. Lesson 6 - Critical Thinking in Engineering Process Level of Students: S.1-S.2 Suggested Lesson Time: 90 min Learning Objectives: Students will: understand the steps suggested by Isidro-Cloudas and Cassis, Glenn in engineering process; be able to enhance their critical thinking skills through the bridge building process. Materials and Apparatus for each group: 80 drinking straws, 1 sticky tape, 10 paper clips, 1 pair of scissors, 1 roll of strings, some A4 papers. Prior knowledge of students: The teacher can ask a few simple questions about the science related to bridges to have a general view on students’ knowledge on bridge design. Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities: Lesson 6 (approx. 90 min.) Introduction to the different types of bridges Time allocation Remarks 10 min. The focus is to let students know the different types of bridges, including beam, arch, truss, cable-stayed and suspension bridges prior to further activities. Activity 1 Draft a design 10 min. The focus of Activity 1 is to motivate students to think about the steps to solve the problem. Activity 2 Introduction to engineering process suggested by IsidroCloudas and Cassis, Glenn in engineering process 10 min. The focus is to let students learn the steps involved in the Engineering Process. P 130 P 131 PowerPoint What factor(s) should you consider when you build an arch bridge? Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context Lesson 6 Introduction to the different types of bridges beam bridge bridge arch bridge Critical Thinking in Engineering Process suspension Why are there different types of bridges? Beam Bridge The major difference between the three types of bridges is the distance that they can cover in a single span. Span is the difference between two supports. Each of the different types of bridges holds weight in different ways. What happens to the bridge when a load is put on the bridge? A beam bridge is basically a rigid horizontal structure that rest on two supports, one located at each end of the bridge as shown in Figure (a). A simple beam bridge is flat across and supported by two ends. What factor(s) should you consider when you build a beam bridge? When the load pushes down on the beam the top edge is pushed together or compressed, while the bottom of the beam is stretched or is under tension. The beam must be strong enough so that it can support its own weight together with the added weight of the traffic crossing it. What happens to the bridge when a load is put on the bridge? Arch Bridge An arch bridge is composed of a curved structure with abutments on each end. The weight of the load is carried outward along the curve of the arch to the abutments at each end of the arch. The abutments also keep the end of the bridge from spreading outward. Suspension Bridge The arch bridge is always under compression because the weight of the deck is pushed outward along the curve of the arch towards the abutments. The rise in the form of the curved arch causes the vertical load to have a horizontal thrust. What happens to the bridge when a load is put on the bridge? The suspension bridge literally suspends the roadbed from huge cables, which extends from one end of the bridge to the other. The cables are attached to two tall towers and are secured at each end by anchorages. What factor(s) should you consider when you build a suspension bridge? The cable carries the weight on a suspended bridge to the anchorages that are imbedded in solid rock or massive concrete blocks. The cables are spread over a large area in order to evenly distribute the load inside the anchorages to prevent the cables from breaking free. The anchorages help to stabilise the bridge. Therefore, the tower must be embedded to the earth firmly. In such a way, the cables transfer the forces to the towers which carry the forces directly into the earth where they are firmly imbedded. Scenario Activity 1 The class is divided into groups of 4 or 5. You are required to design and build a bridge made of drinking straws. The bridge will cross a gap of 50cm. The width of the bridge must not be less than 20cm. The total mass of the bridge must not exceed 50 g. The strength of the bridges would be tested by hanging loads from the middle of the bridges. Draft a design Activity 1 Activity 2 Now, you have 10 minutes to discuss with your group members to design the bridge. Draft the steps you come across. Also, sketch a picture of the bridge you intend to build. Introduction to the steps suggested by Isidro-Cloudas and Cassis, Glenn in engineering process P 132 P 133 Activity 2 Activity 2 The steps involved in Engineering Process are written on 6 cardboards. You are required to design a bridge. Arrange the cardboards in correct order. Try to answer the following questions. Activity 2 Identify the Problem Determine the Constraints Brainstorm the preliminary design and choose the best design Analysis of Design Design Refinement Implementation Plan Activity 2 Identify the Problem Design Refinement Answer Once both the problem(s) or task have been determined and the constraints have been identified, the group needs to think of as many ways as possible to solve the problem. Even though all of the ideas may not be good ones, they may inspire another idea that may lead to a solution to the problem(s). Once all reasonable ideas are listed and the sketches are drawn, the group should choose the best two or three ideas for further development. The rough sketches should be converted to scaled or measured drawings. Analysis of Design P 134 The designs are studied based on their merit in relationship to strength, cost, market appeal, and manufacturability. A decision should be made at this point on which design to use or rather to begin a new design. Answer Each design team should attempt to rectify the problems by making improvements in the design. Implementation Plan Once the final design has been approved, it must be translated from an idea on paper to the real thing. Activity 3 Activity 3 Redesign the bridge Materials provided 80 drinking straws, 1 sticky tape, 10 paper clips, 1 pair of scissors, 1 roll of strings, some A4 papers. Points can be earned by the following rules. The drawing is neat and legible. The three spatial views are labelled. The bridge span is at least 30 cm long. The roadbed is at least 5 cm wide. The distance between the bridge supports is at least 10 cm apart. Activity 3 Activity 3 According to steps of Engineering Process, draw a completed design of the bridge you intend to build. THREE spatial views of the bridge should be included. You may consider the materials provided and the following rubrics to draw the diagram: Activity 3 Activity 3 Constraints are the limitations that must be considered before you begin designing your bridge. Activity 2 Brainstorm the preliminary design and choose the best design Answer Determine the Constraints Answer Answer Before you start, the problem or task that is going to be undertaken must be known. Activity 2 Question: What is/are the task(s) performed in each step of Engineering Process? Activity 2 Answer Activity 2 Activity 2 Answer: Question: What is the sequence of Engineering Process to design the bridge? Activity 2 Question: Compare the steps you drafted with the Engineering Process. Discuss among yourselves which steps you need to reconsider. P 135 Question: What are the constraints when you build a bridge? Teachers’ Reference Activity 3 Activity 4 Answers: Weight, length and width of the bridge, materials and other requirements of the bridge itself. Bridge Building Contest Lesson 6 - Critical Thinking in Engineering Process Learning Objectives Students will: understand the steps suggested by Isidro-Cloudas and Cassis, Glenn in engineering process; be able to enhance their critical thinking skills through the bridge building process. Activity 4 Activity 4 Build a bridge according to your completed design. You may change your design if there is a serious problem in your design. You may refer to the rubrics to build the bridge. The strength of the bridges would be tested by hanging loads from the middle of the bridges until it begins to buckle. At the end of this activity, you are going to evaluate the designs of different groups and choose a. b. the most cost-effective design (materials used vs strength) the strongest bridge design Activity 4 Activity 5 Points can be earned by the following rules. The team adhered to the design. The model is neatly done. The model is built with materials supplied. The bridge span is at least 30 cm long. The roadbed is at least 5 cm wide. The distance between the bridge supports is at least 10 cm apart. Professional’s judgment Suggested Lesson Time: 90 minutes Introduction to the different types of bridges There are three different types of bridges, beam bridge, suspension bridge and arch bridge. Q: Why are there different types of bridges? A: The major difference between the three types of bridges is the distance that they can cover in a single span. Span is the difference between two supports. Each of the different types of bridges holds weight in different ways. Major types of bridges Beam Bridge A beam bridge is basically a rigid horizontal structure that rests on two supports, one located at each end of the bridge as shown below. A simple beam bridge is flat and supported at two ends. Activity 5 An expert or professional is invited to give you comments so that you know which aspects of the bridge design need improvements. P 136 P 137 Q: What happens to the bridge when a load is put on the bridge? A: When the load pushes down on the beam, the top edge is pushed together or compressed, while the bottom of the beam is stretched or is under tension as shown below. Q: What factor(s) should you consider when you build an arch bridge? A: The arch bridge is always under compression because the weight of the deck is pushed outward along the curve of the arch towards the abutments. The rise in the form of the curved arch causes the vertical load to have a horizontal thrust. Suspension Bridge The suspended bridge literally suspends the roadbed from huge cables, which extend from one end of the bridge to the other. The cables are attached to two tall towers and are secured at each end by anchorages. Q: What factor(s) should you consider when you build a beam bridge? A: The beam must be strong enough so that it can support its own weight and the added weight of the traffic crossing it. Arch Bridge An arch bridge is composed of a curved structure with abutments on each end. Q: What happens to the bridge when a load is put on the bridge? A: The cable carries the weight on a suspended bridge to the anchorages that are imbedded in solid rock or massive concrete blocks. The cables are spread over a large area in order to evenly distribute the load inside the anchorages to prevent the cables from breaking free. Q: What factor(s) should you consider when you build a suspension bridge? A: The anchorages help to stabilise the bridge. Therefore, the tower must be embedded to the earth firmly. In such a way, the cables transfer the forces to the towers which carry the forces directly into the earth where they are firmly imbedded. Scenario Q: What happens to the bridge when a load is put on the bridge? A: The weight of the load is carried outward along the curve of the arch towards the abutments at each end of the arch. The abutments keep the end of the bridge from spreading outward. The class is divided into groups of 4 or 5. You are required to design and build a bridge by drinking straws. The bridge will cross a gap of 50 cm. The width of the bridge must not less than 20 cm. The total mass of the bridge must not exceed 50 g. The strength of the bridges would be tested by hanging loads from the middle of the bridges. Activity 1 Draft a design Now, you have 10 minutes to discuss with your group members on how to design the bridge. Draft the steps you come across. Also, sketch a picture of the bridge you intend to build. P 138 P 139 Activity 2 Introduction to the steps suggested by Isidro-Cloudas and Cassis, Glenn in engineering process The Engineering Process for the steps in designing a bridge is written on 6 cardboards. Arrange the cardboards in correct order. Try to answer the following questions. Q: What is the sequence of Engineering Process to design the bridge? A: 1. Identify the Problem 2. Determine the Constraints 3. Brainstorm the preliminary design and choose the best design 4. Analysis of Design 5. Design Refinement 6. Implementation Plan Q: What is/are the task(s) performed in each step of Engineering Process? A: 1. Identify the Problem(s) Before you start, the problem(s) or task(s) that are going to be undertaken must be known. 2. Determine the Constraints Constraints are the limitations that must be considered before you begin designing your bridge. 3. Brainstorm the preliminary design and choose the best design Once both the problem or task has been determined and the constraints have been identified, each group needs to think as many ways as possible to solve the problem. Even though all of the ideas may not be the good ones, they may inspire another ideas that may lead to a solution to the problem. Once all reasonable ideas are listed and the sketches are drawn, each group should choose the best two or three ideas for further development. The rough sketches should be converted to the scaled or measured drawings. 5. Design Refinement Each design team should attempt to rectify the problems by making improvements in the design. 6. Implementation Plan Once the final design has been approved, it must be translated from an idea on paper to the real thing. Remark: The original plan may be changed if there is a serious problem. Activity 3 Redesign the bridge According to steps of Engineering Process, draw a completed design of the bridge you intend to build. THREE spatial views of the bridge should be included. You may consider the materials provided and the following rubrics to draw the diagram. Materials provided 80 drinking straws, 1 sticky tape, 10 paper clips, 1 pair of scissors, 1 roll of strings, some A4 papers. Points can be earned by the following rules. The drawing is neat and legible. The three spatial views are labled. The bridge span is at least 30 cm long. The roadbed is at least 5 cm wide. The distance between the bridge supports is at least 10 cm apart. Q: Compare the steps you drafted with the Engineering Process. Discuss with what steps you need to consider again? Q: What are the constraints when you build a bridge? A: Weight, Length of the bridge, materials, requirements of the bridge itself such as the width of the bridge 4. Analysis of Design The designs are studied based on their merit in relationship to strength, cost, market appeal, and manufacturability. A decision should be made at this point on which design to use or rather to begin a new design. P 140 P 141 Activity 4 Bridge Building Contest Students’ Worksheet Build a bridge according to your completed design, you may change your design if there is a serious problem in your design. You may refer to the rubrics to build the bridge. The strength of the bridges would be tested by hanging loads from the middle of the bridges until it begins to buckle. Lesson 6 - Critical Thinking in Engineering Process 1. There are three different types of bridges, name them. Why are there different types of bridges? At the end of this activity, you are going to evaluate the designs of different groups and choose a. the most cost-effective design (materials used vs strength) b. the strongest bridge design Points can be earned by the following rules. The team adhered to the design. The model is neatly done. The model is built with materials supplied. The bridge span is at least 30 cm long. The roadbed is at least 5 cm wide. The distance between the bridge supports is at least 10 cm apart. 2. What happens to the bridge when a load is put on each type of bridge? Activity 5 Professional’s judgment An expert or professional is invited to give you comments so that you know which aspects need improvements or how to improve your design. Reference reading for building bridge http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/2001/5/01.05.04.x.html#d Activity 1 The class is divided into groups of 4 or 5. You are required to design and build a bridge by drinking straws. The bridge will cross a gap of 50 cm. The width of the bridge must not less than 20 cm. The total mass of the bridge must not exceed 50 g. The strength of the bridges would be tested by hanging loads from the middle of the bridges. Now, you have 10 minutes to discuss with your group members on how to design the bridge. Draft the steps you come across. Also, sketch a picture of the bridge you intend to build. P 142 P 143 Activity 2 Activity 4 The Engineering Process for the steps in designing a bridge is written on 6 cardboards. Arrange the cardboards in correct order. Try to answer the following questions. Materials : 80 drinking straws, 1 sticky tape, 10 paper clips, 1 pair of scissors, 1 roll of strings, some A4 papers. What is the sequence of Engineering Process in designing a bridge? What is/are the task(s) performed in each step of Engineering Process? Build a bridge according to your completed design. You may change your design if there is a serious problem in your design. You may refer to the rubrics to build the bridge. The strength of the bridges would be tested by hanging loads from the middle of the bridges until it begins to buckle. At the end of this activity, you are going to evaluate the designs of different groups and choose a. the most cost-effective design (materials used vs strength) b. the strongest bridge design Points can be earned by the following rules for the Model The team adhered to the design. The model is neatly done. The model is built with materials supplied. The bridge span is at least 30 cm long. The roadbed is at least 5 cm wide. The distance between the bridge supports is at least 10 cm apart. Activity 3 According to the steps of Engineering Process, draw a completed design of the bridge you intend to build. THREE spatial views of the bridge should be included. You may consider the materials provided and the rubrics to draw the diagram: Materials provided in building bridge 80 drinking straws, 1 sticky tape, 10 paper clips, 1 pair of scissors, 1 roll of strings, some A4 papers. Points can be earned by the following rules for the Bridge Design : The drawing is neat and legible. The three views are labelled. The bridge span is at least 30 cm long. The roadbed is at least 5 cm wide. The distance between the bridge supports is at least 10 cm apart. P 144 P 145 Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities PowerPoint Lesson 7 - Arguments in Science Level of Students: S.1-S.2 Suggested Lesson Time: 90 min Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context Lesson 7 Learning Objectives: Activity 1 Arguments in Science Students will be able to: understand the components of an argument; identify claims and evidences of arguments; decide which arguments has more supportive evidence. Use the resource listed below to search evidence for and against ‘genetically modified (GM) food being safe for humans to eat’. Take your side according to the evidence drawn. You will be required to present your argument to your group. http://www.beep.ac.uk/content/392.0.html Prior knowledge of students: Students learnt the basics of scientific investigation in S.1. The teacher can ask a few simple questions on arguments in science to have a general view on students’ knowledge on the topic. Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities: Lesson 7 (approx. 90 min.) Activity 1 Time Remarks allocation 20 min The focus of Activity 1 is to give an opportunity for students to construct the arguments. Activity 2 10 min The focus of Activity 2 is to improve students’ skills in relating evidence and claim. Activity 3 60 min The focus of Activity 3 is to improve students’ skills in deciding which argument has more supportive evidence. Activity 1 Activity 1 Question: What kind of evidence can be used to support an argument? Answer: Data, survey result, research result, facts, truth, legal documents, professional knowledge, common sense recognised by public. Activity 1 Question: Does all evidence support one point of view only? Answer: No. Evidence can be used to support any related arguments. Activity 1 Question: Are your arguments easily overthrown by your group members? Answer: It is because the problems in arguments are not in the evidence, but always in the proof of the evidence. In order to have a strong argument, the following points should be considered. P 146 P 147 a. b. c. Is there enough evidence to support you? Is the evidence credible or convincing? Is the evidence valid or correct? Teachers’ Reference Activity 1 Activity 2 Question: What are the components of an argument? Answers: ARGUMENT = CLAIM + EVIDENCE Claim is a thesis in an argument. Argument or claim should be supported by evidence. You may work in pairs to identify each of the following claims in worksheet A as in favour or against GM crops. Label them as for or against respectively. In addition, you should consider each of the following claims from the perspectives concerning with human health, environment or economics (label them as HH, ENT, ECON respectively). Lesson 7 - Arguments in Science Learning Objectives Students will be able to: understand the components of an argument; identify claims and evidences of arguments; decide which arguments has more supportive evidence. Suggested Lesson Time: 90 minutes Activity 1 Activity 3 Activity 2 Cut up worksheet A and B. Select evidence from worksheet B to support the relevant claim. There will be more than one piece of evidence for most of the arguments. Scenario The class would be divided into 3 groups - supporters and opponents of GM crops as well as the adjudicators. The group in support of GM crops will present their claims and the corresponding evidences first. Then the opposition group may challenge the claims and the evidences. The supporter group can rebut. Then the whole process will go through once more with the opposition group. The adjudicators would comment on the performance of the supporter group and the opposition group, and finally decide whether they would be supporters or opponents of GM crops. Use the resource listed below to search evidence for and against ‘genetically modified (GM) foods being safe for humans to eat’. Take your side according to the evidence drawn. You will be required to present your argument to your group. http://www.beep.ac.uk/content/392.0.html Q: What kind of evidence can be used to support an argument? A: Data, survey result, research result, facts, truth, legal documents, professional knowledge, common sense recognised by public Q: Does all evidence support one point of view only? A: No, evidence can be used to support any related arguments. Q: Are your arguments easily overthrown by your group members? A: Yes. It is because the problems in arguments are not in the evidence, but always in the proof of the evidence. Activity 3 Activity 3 Instructions Pick up your role (group of supporters, opponents and adjudicators) in debate. Discuss with your group members to produce an agreed list. You may find some evidence not shown in worksheet B. Each group of supporters or opponents, will have 15 minutes to present their claims and 5 minutes to rebut. Adjudicators rate debaters’ performance according to the following rubrics. You will have 15 minutes to explain your rating and state the decision at the end of the debate. Rate the evidence using a scale from 1 to 5. 1 2 3 4 5 very weak weak adequate strong very strong need more evidence P 148 In order to have a strong argument, the following points should be considered. a. Is there enough evidence to support you? b. Is the evidence credible or convincing? c. Is the evidence valid or correct? Q: What are the components of an argument? A: ARGUMENT = CLAIM + EVIDENCE Claim is a thesis in an argument. Adequate evidence P 149 Argument or claim should be supported by evidence. Remarks: More information about GM food can be obtained from http://www.food. gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/gmbooklet.pdf. Activity 2 (a) You may work in pairs to identify each of the following claims in worksheet A as in favour or against GM crops, label them as for or against respectively. (b) In addition, you should consider each of the following claims from the perspectives concerning with human health, environment or economics. Label them as HH, ENT, ECON respectively. (c) Cut up worksheet A and B. Select evidence from worksheet B to support the relevant claim. There will be more than one piece of evidence for most of the arguments. Answers Claims 1. GM food is likely to cause human health problems. 2. GM food is safe for humans. 3. GM foods will improve human health. 4. The risk to the ecosystem is unclear so the precautionary principle should be used and GM banned until far more research is carried out. 5. Introduced genes will cause serious damage to food chains and the ecosystem. 6. GM will benefit the environment as less herbicide and insecticide need to be used on GM plants. 7. We have an obligation to use GM to increase food supply and nutrition in poorer countries. 8. Farmers will be able to make more money and sell cheaper food, therefore they should be allowed to use GM. P 150 for/ Type against against HH for HH for HH against ENT Evidence 9. GM technology gives too much control over the food supply against ECON to a few large multinational companies and should be publicly funded. 10. GM has risks and benefits. Careful regulation is needed against ENT/ otherwise the environment will bear all risks and GM ECON companies gain all the benefits. Credit: Angela Melamed, The Nuffield Foundation (2005) Activity 3 The class would be divided into 3 groups - supporters and opponents of GM crops as well as the adjudicators. The group in support of GM crops will present their claims and the corresponding evidences first. Then the opposition group may challenge the claims and the evidences. The supporter group can rebut. Then the whole process will go through once more with the opposition group. The adjudicators would comment on the performance of the supporter group and the opposition group and finally decide whether they would be supporters or opponents of GM crops. Instructions Pick up your role (group of supporters, opponents and adjudicators) in debate. Discuss with your group members to produce an agreed list. You may find some evidence not shown in worksheet B. against ENT Each group of supporters or opponents will have 15 minutes to present their claims and 5 minutes to rebut. Adjudicators rate debaters’ performance according to the following rubrics. You will have 15 minutes to explain your rating and state the decision at the end of the debate. for Rate the evidence using a scale from 1 to 5. for for ENT HH/ ECON ECON 1 Very weak Need more evidence 2 Weak 3 Adequate P 151 4 Strong 5 Very strong Adequate evidence Answers Alternative topic for debate Claims 1. GM food is likely to cause human health problems. 2. GM food is safe for humans. 3. GM food will improve human health. 4. The risk to the ecosystem is unclear so the precautionary principle should be used and GM banned until far more research is carried out. 5. Introduced genes will cause serious damage to food chains and the ecosystem. 6. GM will benefit the environment as less herbicide and insecticide need to be used on GM plants. 7. We have an obligation to use GM to increase food supply and nutrition in poorer countries. 8. Farmers will be able to make more money and sell cheaper food, therefore they should be allowed to use GM. 9. GM technology gives too much control over the food supply to a few large multinational companies and should be publicly funded. 10. GM has risks and benefits. Careful regulation is needed otherwise the environment will bear all risks and GM companies gain all the benefits. for/ against against for for against Type HH HH HH ENT against ENT for ENT for for HH/ A, D, N, U ECON ECON F, G, I, U against ECON K, R, T, Y against ENT/ F, K, P, T, ECON U, V, X Credit: Angela Melamed, The Nuffield Foundation (2005) Evidence C, L A, B, M A, D, N, U E, H, K, Q, S, V, X, Z E, Q, V, X, Z I, W Background Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in scientific experimentation. The testing is conducted inside universities, pharmaceutical companies and farms. Areas of conducting animal testing cover genetics, developmental biology, behavioural studies, organ transplantation, drug testing and cosmetics testing etc. Debate: Is it morally acceptable to experiment on animals for human purposes? The class can be divided into 3 groups. Each group should have supporters, opponents as well as the adjudicators. According to your standpoint, supporters and opponents should work together to list out all your supporting claims and evidences before conducting debate. Adjudicators summarize what you hear in the debate and make your decision. You have 10 minutes to prepare the list. Hints: You may consider the following aspects. Do humans have justifying testing? Are humans superior to animals or equals? Is it wrong to believe that animals have rights? Does animal testing have little to no impact on the environment? Are alternatives to animal testing inadequate? Are the sources of animals used in laboratories appropriate? The above information is retrieved from the following website on 10 th Oct 2008. http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Debate:Animal_Experimentation#Is_it_morally_ acceptable_to_experiment_on_animals_for_human_purposes.3F Remarks: More information about animal testing can be obtained from http://www. aph.gov.au/senate/committee/history/animalwelfare_ctte/animal_experimentation/ index.htm P 152 P 153 Students’ Worksheet Lesson 7 Arguments in Science Activity 1 Use the resource listed below to search evidence for and against ‘genetically modified (GM) food being safe for humans to eat’. Take your side according to the evidence drawn. You will be required to present your argument to your group. http://www.beep.ac.uk/content/392.0.html (a) What kind of evidence can be used to support an argument? (b) Does all evidence support one point of view only? (c) How can you prevent your argument from easily overthrown by your group members? (d) What are the components of an argument? (b) In addition, you should consider each of the following claims from the perspectives concerning with human health, environment or economics. Label them as HH, ENT, ECON respectively. (c) Cut up worksheet A and B. Select evidence from worksheet B to support the relevant claim. There will be more than one piece of evidence for most of the arguments. Activity 3 The class would be divided into 3 groups - supporters and opponents of GM crops as well as the adjudicators. The group in support of GM crops will present their claims and the corresponding evidences first. Then the opposition group may challenge the claims and the evidences. The supporter group can rebut. Then the whole process will go through once more with the opposition group. The adjudicators would comment on the performance of the supporter group and the opposition group and finally decide whether they would be supporters or opponents of GM crops. Instructions Pick up your role (group of supporters, opponents and adjudicators) in debate. Discuss with your group members to produce an agreed list. You may find some evidence not shown in worksheet B. Each group of supporters or opponents will have 15 minutes to present their claims and evidences, and 5 minutes to rebut. Adjudicators rate debaters’ performance according to the following table. You will have 10 minutes to explain your rating and make your decision at the end of the debate. Rate the evidence using a scale from 1 to 5. 1 2 3 very weak weak adequate need more evidence Activity 2 (a) You may work in pairs to identify each of the following claims in worksheet A as in favour or against GM crops. Label them as for or against respectively. P 154 P 155 4 strong 5 very strong adequate evidence Worksheet A Worksheet B Claims For / Against Type 1. GM food is likely to cause human health problems. 2. GM food is safe for humans. 3. GM food will improve human health. 4. The risk to the ecosystem is unclear so the precautionary principle should be used and GM banned until far more research is carried out. 5. Introduced genes will cause serious damage to food chains and the ecosystem. 6. GM will benefit the environment as less herbicide and insecticide need to be used on GM plants. 7. We have an obligation to use GM to increase food supply and nutrition in poorer countries. 8. Farmers will be able to make more money and sell cheaper food, therefore they should be allowed to use GM. 9. GM technology gives too much control over the food supply to a few large multinational companies and should be publicly funded. 10. GM has risks and benefits. Careful regulation is needed otherwise the environment will bear all risks and GM companies gain all the benefits. Evidences A. No evidence of harm to human health from eating GM food exists B. In the US more than half of all soya and maize is GM C. Rats fed on potatoes which had been genetically modified to contain a plant toxin became ill D. GM rice has been developed to contain vitamin A E. Laboratory studies showed that Monarch butterflies had a lower survival rate when fed on GM plants F. Yields of GM cotton containing insecticide are greater than yields of non-GM cotton in the same conditions G. The cost of insecticide is the main expense for cotton farmers H. Insects gradually become resistant to most widely used insecticides I. Fields with GM plants that are herbicide resistant need less frequent herbicide spraying J. In the UK extensive trials have shown that herbicide-tolerant maize causes less damage to the environment than normal maize K. Trials for food safety of GM crops are usually carried out by the companies that have developed them, not by an independent body L. There is some evidence that GM food may be allergenic to some sensitive people M. Cows fed on GM soya and maize showed no GM genes in their milk N. It will be possible to develop GM plants that give better yields in arid or poor soil O. GM companies have decided not to market any GM crops in the UK at present P. Farmers will be able to spray fields with herbicide more often without damage to their crops Q. Plant pollen can travel large distances R. Almost no research has been done on developing GM plants that give better yields in arid or salty soil S. It is unclear whether wild plants which have crossed with GM crops will have an advantage or a disadvantage in the wild T. Large multinational companies have been given patents on many plant genes U. The GM variety of many crops gives an increased yield V. In the UK trials of GM crops showed that growing herbicide tolerant grapes and beet reduces the number of butterflies and bees in the area W. Insecticide spray always affects the areas surrounding the crops and runs off into rivers causing further damage X. The interdependence of all species of living organisms in an ecosystem means that the results of changes in one species may have unpredictable consequences Y. GM companies have been buying seed producing firms in Europe and in India Z. It is known that genes can spread from crops to related wild plants Type Credit: Angela Melamed, The Nuffield Foundation (2005) (Worksheet A and B) P 156 P 157 Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities Lesson 8Analogies in Science Level of Students: S.1-S.2 Learning Objectives: Students will be able to understand analogy in inference and its limitation; apply analogy to infer special property from a particular object to another particular object; be able to appreciate how analogy contributes to the development of science. Activity 3 15 min. (Data of two solar system objects, the Earth and the Mars) Activity 4 15 min. (Illustration of science concepts with analogy) Activity 5 15 min. Supplementary activities: Suggested Lesson Time: 90 min. Prior knowledge of students: S.1 students learnt the particle model at the end of the second term. The teacher may ask the students a few related questions to check their understanding on the particle model. Then the teacher may introduce to the students the use of analogy in sicence. 15 min. The focus of this activity is on the application of analogy on scientific prediction (a) The focus of this activity is on the use of analogy to illustrate difficult science concepts (b) There may be limits to analogy The focus of this activity is on the contribution of analogy in science and the limits to analogy. (a) The focus of this activity is to let students appreciate the wonder of analogies leading to scientific discoveries or inventions. (b) Students are reminded that analogies are used in many clinical researches and the final success on humans depends on probability. Focus Ideas: If two things or objects, A and B have some similar properties, and A has other special attribute, property W, we can possibly infer that B also has the attribute, property W. Analogy is an inference from a particular object to another particular object. For instance, a camera is compared to an eye. Scientific analogies make people think creatively leading to many discoveries and inventions. Analogies also help with the development, evaluation and exposition of scientific theories, models and concepts. However, there are limitations to analogies because analogies may create misconceptions to scientific concepts. Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities: Lesson 8 Analogies in Science Activity 1 (A4 Paper Experiment) Activity 2 (The story of doctor Sun Simiao) Time allocation Approx. 90 min. 15 min. 15 min. Remarks The students are divided into groups of 4-5 members to carry out the activities. This activity aims to motivate students to learn the concept of analogy (a). The focus of this activity is to let students appreciate how analogy helps to solve medical problems in the past; (b). This activity also introduces to students the related logic of analogy and the relationship among analogy, induction and deduction in science. P 158 P 159 PowerPoint Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context Lesson 8 Analogies in Science Activity 1 Activity 2 You are given a piece of A4 paper and two paper clips. Try to fold the piece of paper to support the weight of as many books as you can (i.e. the pile of books are placed on the folded paper). Long time ago a patient suffered from a disease making him unable to urinate. His belly was swelling more and more and he was in great pain. His doctor, Sun Simiao (孫思邈 AD 581-682) thought that his urinary tract must have been blocked. He could not think of the treatment right away and was very frustrated because his patient might die soon. Why do you fold the piece of paper in such way (any related science concepts or principles)? This cylindrical paper roll acts like a pillar (an example of analogy) and can support heavy weights, too. What can a scallion do? Activity 2 He then saw a boy playing music with a roasted scallion (烤熟的蔥管) by blowing air through it. It made him think of the idea to save the patient’s life! What was Dr Sun’s treatment? The piece of paper is folded to a ring-shaped structure. In what way(s) are urinary tracts and scallions in common? What can a scallion do? Hair band Shape? string pen The ring-shaped paper roll acts like a pillar (an example of analogy) and can support heavy weights. Property /function? The piece of paper is folded to a cylindrical shaped structure. P 160 P 161 straw shoelace Vine basket Dr Sun then saw a boy playing music with a roasted scallion (烤熟的蔥管) by blowing air through it. It made him think of the idea that he could insert such a tube (by cutting one end of the tube small and sharp) into the urinary tract of the patient and the urine can be sucked out by mouth. Finally he really did so and the patient was saved. Discussion questions: Activity 3 Urinary tracts and scallions are similar. Dr. Sun used analogy to find a solution to the problem of his patient. Below is the data of two solar system objects, the Earth and the Mars: Surface temperature Analogy Analogy Average density Object A and object B are similar in having properties X1, X2, X3, …… If two things or objects, A and B have some similar properties, and A has other special attribute, property W, we can possibly infer that B also has the attribute, property W. Analogy is an inference from a particular object to another particular object. Object A has property W. It is most likely that Object B also has the property W. Relationship among analogy, induction and deduction in science Analogy Generalisation A: X1, X2, X3, ……; W B: X1, X2, X3, …… Therefore, B may have property W. Deduction Induction Special attribute A (particular facts or ideas) Analogy Special attribute B (particular facts or ideas) (reference: 《類比》王溢然,張耀久(2001)) P 162 Average 17 degree Celsius 5500 kg/m 3 -93 to -3 degree Celsius Special features Earth Mars (火星) Shape spherical spherical Moon one moon 2 moons Orbital period 1 earth year (remarks: Neptune-164 earth year; Uranus-84 earth year) Components of the Atmosphere 78% nitrogen 21 % oxygen 1 % argon, water vapour, carbon dioxide, other inert gases 95.3 % Carbon dioxide 2.7 % nitrogen 1.6% argon trace amounts of oxygen, carbon monoxide and water vapour Water Abundant amount of water In 2007 scientists discovered that the south pole of Mars was covered by dry ice and cold water. Methane Released as metabolites of living organisms The presence of methane was detected in 2003. 3900 kg/m 3 Surface gravity 1.00 (Earth = 1.00) 0.38 Atmospheric pressure 1.0 (Earth = 1.00) 0.007 Discussion questions: 1. What are the similar properties between the Earth and Mars? 2. It is a very distinctive property of the Earth that there are living creatures on the Earth. Do you have great confidence to use Analogy to argue that there would also be living things on Mars? Please explain your answer. P 163 1.9 earth year Hydraulic analogy to explain electric circuit Task 1 1. Fill in the blanks: Wires ( ) Potential ( ) Voltage (potential difference) ( Current ( ) Resistor ( ) Wires Electrical Potential Voltage ) Electric current Light bulb Pump Reference website (analogy model): http://www.ac.www.edu/~vawter/PhysicsNet/Topics/DCCurrent/WaterFlowAnalog.html 2. What are the limits to the above hydraulic analogy? Paddle Water pressure Water pipes Difference in pressure between two points Water current (b) Analogy leads to inventions The importance of analogy in logic is that it helps with divergent thinking and enhances creativity. Many inventions were due to analogical thinking. For instance, it was found that bats could fly freely without hitting any obstacles in the dark. The discovery of radars was through the analogy to the sound wave detecting system of bats. Dry cell (c) Analogy provides logical foundation Activity 5 We may ask the following questions ourselves: for modeling experiments Analogy is commonly used in simulation, which in turn has been a very important process in scientific research. For instance, scientists and engineers usually use wind tunnels to carry out investigations on aircrafts. 1. Name the contribution of analogy in science. In the hydraulic analogy model water would leak out if there is a hole in the water pipe. Electric charge would not “leak out” if there is a hole in the wires. The pump of the above hydraulic analogy model does not need energy to work with. 2. What are the limits to analogy? Wind tunnel 1. Name the contribution of analogy in science. 1. Name the contribution of analogy in science. (a)Analogy helps with the development of new concepts and hypotheses in science Though the fact that a conclusion inferred from analogy may be right is due to probability, analogy is still an important method to form new concepts especially during the initial stage of concept or theory development. In science many important theories started with some hypotheses formulated by analogies and then supported by empirically evidence. P 164 However, new knowledge generated through analogy must be compared with prior knowledge in order to have a strong analogical argument. The inferred properties/ relationship between 2 objects using analogy method may or may not be true and it all depends on probability. In general, the relevance of the similarities is important. Moreover, the number of relevant similarities also matters. The greater the number of relevant and fundamental properties between the 2 objects, the stronger the analogical relationship between the two objects. Furthermore, if there are incompatibility between the inferred properties and the properties of the analogue, the strength of the analogical inference is weak. 2. What are the limits to analogy? (a) Analogy helps explain science concepts well but can create misconceptions. An analogy is sometimes valid for understanding part of a scientific process but it may not be able to be applied to the process as a whole. Credit: NASA (b) The reliability of the conclusion drawn from analogy depends on empirical evidence. P 165 1. Search for examples of analogies leading to scientific discoveries or inventions. Supplementary activities: Alexander Graham Bell used analogies to invent telephones. Bell’s idea for the telephone was sparked by the human ear structure. 1. Search for examples of analogies leading to scientific discoveries or inventions. Scientists tried to use lines to represent lines of force surrounding a bar magnet. The legend that Archimedes (c. 287-212 BC) used analogy to uncover a fraud against King Hieron II of Syracuse using his principle of buoyancy. Teachers’ Reference Lesson 8Analogies in Science Learning Objectives: Students will be able to understand analogy in inference and its limitation; apply analogy to infer special property from a particular object to another particular object; be able to appreciate how analogy contributes to the development of science. Suggested Lesson Time: about 90 min. 2. Challenging Problem Discussion Question: According to a press release dated on 4 June 2008, a leading microbiologist Professor Yuen Kwok-yung, the University of Hong Kong, discovered ways to increase the survival rate of mice infected with H5N1. In the research mice were first given 1000 times lethal dose of H5N1. (a) What is the analogy reasoning of carrying out the clinical trial? (b) Please comment on the chance of success of the clinical trial. Then after 48 hours one group of mice were given the antiviral drug, zanamivir while another group of mice was given the antiviral drug zanamivir and two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, celecoxib and mesalazine. It was found that the survival rate of mice infected with lethal doses of the bird flu virus, H5N1 could increase from 13.3 per cent (zanamivir alone) to 53.3 per cent (i.e. fourfold). Clinical trials with these three drugs would be carried out later to investigate the effect on human infected with H5N1. Focus Ideas: If two things or objects, A and B have some similar properties, and A has other special attribute, property W, we can possibly infer that B also has the attribute, property W. Analogy is an inference from a particular object to another particular object. For instance, a camera is compared to an eye. Scientific analogies make people think creatively leading to many discoveries and inventions. Analogies also help with the development, evaluation and exposition of scientific theories, models and concepts. However, there are limitations to analogies because analogies may create misconceptions to science concepts. Activity 1 You are given a piece of A4 paper and two paper clips. Try to fold the piece of paper to support the weight of as many books as you can (i.e. the pile of books are placed on the folded paper). Why do you fold the piece of paper in such way (any related science concepts or principles)? (b) Please comment on the chance of success of the clinical trial. (a) What is the analogy reasoning of carrying out the clinical trial? The experimental data shows that although the drug cocktail works in mice, the treatment may not work on infected human. Mice and human share many biological similarities but there are still a lot of biological differences. It is uncertain that the drug cocktail works on infected human. Mice have many similarities to humans. Mice infected with H5N1 survive better with the new treatment (“drug cocktail”). Human infected with H5N1 may survive better with the new treatment (“drug cocktail”), too. P 166 Note: Students may roll the paper to a cylinder-shaped or a ring-shaped struture and use the paper clips to fix the shape. Both structures can support the weight of several books by adjusting the centre of mass along the middle line of the cylinder or the ring. Such structures are similar to pillars commonly used in buildings (an example of analogy) to support heavy weights. P 167 Activity 2 Long time ago a patient suffered from a disease making him unable to urinate. His belly was swelling more and more and he was in great pain. His doctor, Sun Simiao ( AD 581-682) thought that his urinary tract must have been blocked. He could not think of the treatment right away and was very frustrated because his patient might die soon. Relationship among Analogy, Induction and Deduction in Science Generalization He then saw a boy playing music with a roasted scallion (烤熟的蔥管) by blowing air through it. It made him think of the idea that he could insert such a tube (by cutting one end of the tube small and sharp) into the urinary tract of the patient and the urine can be sucked out by mouth. Finally he really did so and the patient was saved. Induction Discussion questions: In what way(s) are urinary tracts and scallions similar? Then use a diagram to show how (the logic of thinking) Dr. Sun arrived at his solution to the problem of his patient. Note: Analogy If two things or objects, A and B have some similar properties, and A has other special attribute, property W, we can possibly infer that B also has the attribute, property W. Analogy is an inference from a particular object to another particular object. Object A and object B are similar in having properties X1, X2, X3, …… Object A has property W. It is most likely that Object B also has the property W. A: X1, X2, X3, ……; W B: X1, X2, X3, …… Therefore, B may have property W. P 168 Special Attribute A Deduction Analogy Special Attribute B (particular facts or ideas) (particular facts or ideas) reference:《類比》王溢然,張耀久(2001) Activity 3 Below is the data of two solar system objects, the Earth and the Mars: Special Features Earth Mars (火星) Shape spherical spherical Moon one moon 2 moons Orbital Period 1 earth year 1.9 earth year (remarks: Neptune-164 earth year, Uranus-84 earth year) Surface temperature Average 17 degree Celsius Average density 5500kg/m3 3900kg/m3 Surface gravity 1.00 (Earth = 1.00) 0.38 P 169 Atmospheric pressure Components of the Atmosphere 1.0 (Earth = 1.00) 78% nitrogen 21 % oxygen 1 % argon, water vapour, carbon dioxide, other inert gases Water Abundant amount of water Methane Released as metabolites of living organisms 0.007 95.3 % Carbon dioxide 2.7 % nitrogen 1.6% argon trace amounts of oxygen, carbon monoxide and water vapour In 2007 scientists discovered that the south pole of Mars was covered by dry ice and cold water. The presence of methane was detected in 2003. Discussion questions: 1. What are the similar properties between the Earth and Mars? 2. It is a very distinctive property of the Earth that there are living creatures on the Earth. Do you have great confidence to use Analogy to argue that there would also be living things on Mars? Please explain your answer. P 170 P 171 The analogical relationship is represented by the symbol Task 4 1. Fill in the blanks: Wires (water pipes) Potential (water pressure) Voltage (potential difference) (difference in pressure between two points) Current (quantity of water flowing through over time) Resistor (all pipes have resistance) 2. What are the limits to the above hydraulic analogy? We may ask the following questions ourselves: In the hydraulic analogy model water would leak out if there is a hole in the water pipe. Electric charge would not “leak out” if there is a hole in the wires. The pump of the above hydraulic analogy model does not need energy to work with. (b) Analogy leads to inventions The importance of analogy in logic is that it helps with divergent thinking and enhances creativity. Many inventions were due to analogical thinking. For instance, it was found that bats could fly freely without hitting any obstacles in the dark. The discovery of radars was through the analogy to the sound wave detecting system of bats. (c) Analogy provides logical foundation for modeling experiments Analogy is commonly used in simulation, which in turn has been a very important process in scientific research. For instance, scientists and engineers usually use wind tunnels to carry out investigations on aircrafts. 2. What are the limits to analogy? Activity 5 1. Name the contribution of analogy in science. (a) Analogy helps explain science concepts well but can create misconceptions. An analogy is sometimes valid for understanding part of a science process but it may not be able to be applied to the process as a whole. Note: Contribution of Analogy in Science (b) The reliability of the conclusion drawn from analogy depends on empirical evidence. (a) Analogy helps with the development of new concepts and hypotheses in science Though the fact that a conclusion inferred from analogy may be right is due to probability, analogy is still an important method to form new concepts especially during the initial stage of concept or theory development. In science, many important theories started with some hypotheses formulated by analogies and then supported by empirically evidence. However, new knowledge generated through analogy must be compared with prior knowledge in order to have a strong analogical argument. The inferred properties/ relationship between 2 objects using analogy method may or may not be true and it all depends on probability. In general, the relevance of the similarities is important. Moreover, the number of relevant similarities also matters. The greater the number of relevant and fundamental properties between the 2 objects, the stronger the analogical relationship between the two objects. Furthermore, if there are incompatibility between the inferred properties and the properties of the analogue, the strength of the analogical inference is weak. P 172 P 173 Supplementary activities: Human infected with H5N1 may survive better with the new treatment (“drug cocktail”), too. 1. Search for examples of analogies leading to scientific discoveries or inventions. Notes: Alexander Graham Bell used analogies to invent telephones. Bell’s idea for the telephone was sparked by the human ear structure. Scientists tried to use lines to represent lines of force surrounding a bar magnet. The legend that Archimedes (c. 287-212 BC) used analogy to uncover a fraud against King Hieron II of Syracuse using his principle of buoyancy. (reference: http://www.juliantrubin.com/bigten/archimedesprinciple.html) (b) Please comment on the chance of success of the clinical trial. Though the experimental data shows that the drug cocktail works in mice, the treatment may not work on infected human. Mice and human share many biological similarities but there are still a lot of biological differences. It is uncertain that the drug cocktail works on infected human. 2. Challenging Problem According to a press release dated on 4 June 2008 a leading microbiologist, Professor Yuen Kwok-yung, the University of Hong Kong, discovered ways to increase the survival rate of mice infected with H5N1. In the research mice were first given 1000 times lethal dose of H5N1. Then after 48 hours one group of mice were given the antiviral drug, zanamivir while another group of mice was given the antiviral drug zanamivir and two non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents, celecoxib and mesalazine. It was found that the survival rate of mice infected with lethal doses of the bird flu virus, H5N1 could increase from 13.3 per cent (zanamivir alone) to 53.3 per cent (i.e. fourfold). Clinical trials with these three drugs would be carried out later to investigate the effect on human infected with H5N1. Discussion Question: (a) What is the analogy reasoning of carrying out the clinical trial? Suggested answer: Mice have many similarities to humans. Mice infected with H5N1 survive better with the new treatment (“drug cocktail”). P 174 P 175 Students’ Worksheet Lesson 8 Activity 3 Below are the data of two solar system objects, the Earth and the Mars: Analogies in Science Activity 1 You are given a piece of A4 paper and two paper clips. Try to fold the piece of paper to support the weight of as many books as you can (i.e. the pile of books are placed on the folded paper). Why do you fold the piece of paper in such way (any related science concepts or principles)? Activity 2 Long time ago a patient suffered from a disease making him unable to urinate. His belly was swelling more and more and he was in great pain. His doctor, Sun Simiao (孫思邈 AD 581-682) thought that his urinary tract must have been blocked. He could not think of the treatment right away and was very frustrated because his patient might die soon. He then saw a boy playing music with a roasted scallion (烤熟的蔥管) by blowing air through it. It made him think of the idea that he could insert such a tube (by cutting one end of the tube small and sharp) into the urinary tract of the patient and the urine can be sucked out by the mouth. Finally he really did so and the patient was saved. Discussion questions: In what way(s) are urinary tracts and scallions similar? Then use a diagram to show how (the logic of thinking) Dr. Sun arrived at his solution to the problem of his patient. P 176 Special features Earth Mars: Shape Moon Orbital period spherical one moon 1 earth year Surface temperature Average density Average 17 degree Celsius spherical 2 moons 1.9 earth year (remarks: Neptune-164 earth year; Uranus-84 earth year) -93 to -3 degree Celsius 3900 kg/ 3 Surface gravity Atmospheric pressure Components of the Atmosphere 5500 kg/ m 1.00 (Earth = 1.00) 1.0 (Earth = 1.00) 78% nitrogen 21 % oxygen 1 % argon, water vapour, carbon dioxide, other inert gases Water Abundant amount of water Methane Released as metabolites of living organisms P 177 m3 0.38 0.007 95.3 % Carbon dioxide 2.7 % nitrogen 1.6% argon trace amounts of oxygen, carbon monoxide and water vapour In 2007 scientists discovered that the south pole of Mars was covered by dry ice and cold water. The presence of methane was detected in 2003. Discussion questions: 1. What are the similar properties between the Earth and Mars? 2. It is a very distinctive property of the Earth that there are living creatures on the Earth. Do you have great confidence to use Analogy to argue that there would also be living things on Mars? Please explain your answer. P 178 P 179 Voltage (potential difference) ( ) Current ( ) Resistor ( ) Reference website (analogy model): http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~vawter/PhysicsNet/ Topics/DC-Current/WaterFlowAnalog.html 2. What are the limits to analogy? 2. What are the limits to the above hydraulic analogy? Supplementary activities: 1. Search for examples of analogies leading to scientific discoveries or inventions. Activity 5 1. Name the contribution of analogy in science. P 180 P 181 2. Challenging Problem According to a press release dated on 4 June 2008 a leading microbiologist, Professor Yuen Kwok-yung, the University of Hong Kong, discovered ways to increase the survival rate of mice infected with H5N1. Snapshots of Lesson 8 In the research mice were first given 1000 times lethal dose of H5N1. Then after 48 hours one group of mice were given the antiviral drug, zanamivir while another group of mice was given the antiviral drug zanamivir and two non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents, celecoxib and mesalazine. It was found that the survival rate of mice infected with lethal doses of the bird flu virus, H5N1 could increase from 13.3 per cent (zanamivir alone) to 53.3 per cent (i.e. fourfold). Clinical trials with these three drugs would be carried out later to investigate the effect on human infected with H5N1. Discussion Question: (a) What is the analogy reasoning of carrying out the clinical trial? (b) Please comment on the chance of success of the clinical trial. P 182 P 183 Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities Suggested Learning and Teaching Activities: Lesson 9 Pseudoscience Lesson 9Pseudoscience Level of Students: S.1-S.2 Activity 1 (The Fifth Great Invention of China) Learning Objectives: Students will be able to distinguish between science and pseudoscience; identify flaws in pseudoscience. Activity 2 (SUPER Water) Time allocation Approx. 90 min. 20 min. Suggested Lesson Time: 1 period (about 90 min.) Focus Ideas: It is important to be able to distinguish between science and pseudoscience. Pseudoscience lacks the criteria of evidence, the design of meaningful experiments, the weighing of possibilities, the testing of hypotheses, the establishment of theories, the many aspects of scientific methods that make it possible to draw reliable conclusions about the physical universe. From time to time people are bombarded by the mass media of news and claims of pseudoscience. People need a scientific habit of mind to distinguish between true science and pseudoscience. Prior knowledge of students: Students often come across advertisements on topics like healthy foods and weight reduction programmes. Many claims of such advertisements involve science terminology. The teacher may ask the students a few related questions to check their understanding on the reliability of such claims. P 184 P 185 Remarks The students are divided into groups of 4-5 members to carry out the activities. (a). The focus of this activity is to let students know how people can be cheated by pseudoscience; (b). Students are motivated to think deeply on the characteristics of pseudoscience. (a). Students are required to act out the different roles (customers, salesmen, scientists, representatives of the Consumer Council) so as to have a better understanding of pseudoscience; (b). Students should be able to distinguish between science and pseudoscience after the lesson. PowerPoint Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context Lesson 9 Activity 1 Read the following news: Pseudoscience The Fifth Great Invention of China Activity 1 Activity 1 A man from China called Wong Hung Shing claimed that he discovered the technology to convert water to fuel oil on 7 November 1983. He first prepared a chief formulation that contained a small amount of alkyne (a compound that can be burned) and then he added this chief formulation to a large amount of water (ratio: 1/100,000 volume/volume). A water-based fuel was claimed to be created that could be a substitute for petrol and the cost was very cheap. He said that the water-based fuel could be produced very easily by a simple machine. One tonne of the chief formulation could be produced in 20 minutes and one tonne of the chief formulation could in turn produce 10 tonnes or more of the water-based fuel. The mass media reported Wong’s invention and he demonstrated his technology to some famous scientists in China. Some presidents of the universities and senior government officials believed his invention doubt. Some mass media claimed Wong’s invention as the Fifth Great Invention of China. Discussion questions: 1) 2) 3) 1. What was Wong’s invention? What was Wong’s invention? What were the evidences (or what seemed to be the evidences) that supported Wong’s invention? Were the evidences you read from the news sufficient to make you believe in Wong’s invention? If not, what other evidences or information you would like to get hold of before A very cheap water-based fuel produced by adding small amount of alkyne to large amount of water in the ratio 1:100,000 (V/V). 2. 1. Were the evidences you read from the news sufficient to make you believe in Wong’s invention? If not, what other evidences or information you would like to get hold of before you can believe in Wong’s invention? What were the evidences (or what seemed to be the evidences) that supported Wong’s invention? a. He demonstrated his technology to some famous scientists in China. [It did not tell whether those famous scientists believed his invention or not] b. Some presidents of the universities and senior government officials believed in his invention without a doubt. [The newspaper only told us that there were some people of high rank believed in Wong’s invention but there were also some or many people who did not believe in Wong’s invention] c. Some mass media claimed Wong’s invention as the Fifth Great Invention of China. [We do not know the credibility of the mass media] a. Background of the “inventor” including his qualifications and career; b. His experimental procedure and exact formulation; c. Can we repeat his experiment? d. Can his invention be tested by famous universities, the government or accredited organisations? e. Any theoretical backup to his invention? Can we use existent scientific concepts, theories, principles or laws to explain the mechanism of his invention? Background of Wong Hung Shing Commercial Interests / Corruptions / Flaws? Wong was born in China and received 4-year’s schooling. He had been a carpenter, soldier and a bus driver before he invented the waterbased fuel. Wong’s invention was widely reported in the mass media. He flew to many places like Beijing, Shanghai to demonstrate his invention. He was then appointed the head of the newly established Energy Institute of Hei Long Jiang (黑龍江). In 1987 he was commissioned RMB$600,000 (人民幣) to produce the water-based fuel at He Bei (河北). However, more and more people became skeptical about his invention as time went by. He was finally caught in 1987 and sentenced to 10-year imprisonment. Activity 2 Reflection questions: Read the following advertisement found in a newspaper: 1. Can you suggest some reasons why people believed in Wong’s invention? 2. How do we know that Wong’s “invention” is not real science? Explain your answer. you can believe in Wong’s invention? P 186 P 187 SUPER Company has a water filter that can convert tap water to SUPER WATER. SUPER Water can change ordinary water to smaller water clusters. These water clusters can pass easily through ion channels of cells. Hence, water can be absorbed faster than ordinary water molecules to keep our skin moist. The pH of the SUPER WATER is 9.5. Alkaline water can prevent people from constipation and long-term diarrhea. S UP E R Water P s eudos cience Pseudoscience SUPER Water False a set of beliefs about the world incorrectly thought to be scientific a certain method, theory, or practice that claims to be scientific but fails to adhere to the basic requirements of the scientific method. knowledge more likely to be driven by ideological, cultural, or commercial goals. The dissolved oxygen content of SUPER WATER is also greater than that of ordinary tap water. The higher dissolved oxygen content can improve health because it can increase the metabolic rate of cells and hence enhancing the immunity of the body. Characteristics of Pseudoscience Characteristics of Pseudoscience SUPER Water Change water into smaller water molecule clusters SUPER WATER Filter was invented by an expert of water science, Dr. Kwun Lee. He is the chairman of International Research Laboratory on Water Science since 2001. SUPER Water Alkaline water The SUPER WATER filter has been accredited by NSF. The cost of the SUPER WATER Filter was HK$6,000. The filter core needs to be changed every year and the cost is HK$500. No concrete research findings from other scientists in the following days support the claim or theory Claim not supported by scientific research Accredited by NSF Higher dissolved oxygen content Contradict with existent science knowledge, theories, principles, laws… The findings are usually for commercial use - selling questionable products for big profits Results not reproduced or verified Unclear experimental procedure Task 1: 1.Do you believe the claim? Suppose you are Customers - a customer, explain whether you believe the claim of SUPER Water filter or not. -a salesman of the SUPER company, how will you promote the SUPER Water filter to your customers? -a scientist, tell people with scientific evidences or sound reasons whether you support the claim of SUPER Water filter or not. -a representative from the Consumer Council, give advice to the consumers on the claim of SUPER Company on SUPER water. Scientists Salesman of the SUPER COMPANY Representatives from the Consumer Council P 188 The company uses a lot of scientific terms (water clusters, ion channels, cells, pH, dissolved oxygen content, metabolic rate, immunity) to describe the special feature and function of its filter. The use of such scientific terms may make people think that the claim is scientific. However, how true the claim is needs further evidence or research findings from other scientists. Now there is no further information provided by the company. P 189 The company told us that the product was invented by an expert of water science and the product has been accredited by an international organization NSF. We may check more information about the credibility of Dr Kwun Lee and the International Research Laboratory on Water Science by searching the internet. If Dr Kwun Lee has little or no research publication in high standard journals or the scale of the International Research Laboratory on Water Science is very small (say only one chairman and no other staff), the evidence of the claim would be weak. Will the accreditation of NSF affect your decision to believe the claim of SUPER WATER Filter? (Remarks: NSF stands for U.S. National Sanitation Foundation Standard) The accreditation of NSF is irrelevant to the claim of the product. Accreditation by NSF only shows that the production of the product matches a set of regulations set out by the NSF. However, NSF is NOT an organisation that is responsible to test or verify the claim of the product. Science Pseudoscience The claim is testable and supported by scientific research recorded in high standard scientific journals. The claim is not testable and there is no support from scientific research recorded in high standard scientific journals The finding does not usually contradict existing scientific knowledge, theories, principles and laws. The findings usually contradict existing scientific knowledge, theories, principles and laws. The claim is not vague and the experimental procedure is clearly written and the result can be reproduced by other scientists. The claim uses vague language and the result cannot be reproduced or verified. The exact procedure of the experiment is not clearly provided . Other people cannot figure out what has been done and how it was done. Teachers’ Reference Lesson 9Pseudoscience Learning Objectives: Students will be able to distinguish between science and pseudoscience; identify flaws in pseudoscience. Suggested Lesson Time: 1 period (about 90 min.) Focus Ideas: Science Pseudoscience As time goes by, more research findings from other scientists give more evidences to support the claim or the theory. No concrete research findings from other scientists in the following days support the claim or the theory. Pseudoscience explains away or ignores falsifying evidence. The product of the application of the science must be tested thoroughly before marketing. The findings are usually for selling commercial products with big profits. Examples of Pseudoscience Astrology Reasons that Astrology is not considered as real science are as follows: Astrological interpretations and prediction are not based on science theories, principles or laws but from astrological theories. Astrologers do not conduct carefully controlled experiments to test astrological theories. Astrologers use vague language to explain and predict things as well as to explain away wrong prediction. Some personality descriptions are very general and fit nearly everyone. It is important to be able to distinguish between science and pseudoscience. Pseudoscience lacks the criteria of evidence, the design of meaningful experiments, the weighing of possibilities, the testing of hypotheses, the establishment of theories, the many aspects of scientific methods that make it possible to draw reliable conclusions about the physical universe. From time to time people are bombarded by the mass media of news and claims of pseudoscience. People need a scientific habit of mind to distinguish between true science and pseudoscience. Activity 1 Read the following news: The Fifth Great Invention of China A man called Wong Hung Shing claimed that he discovered the technology to convert water to fuel oil on 7 November, 1983 in China. He first prepared a chief formulation that contained a small amount of alkyne (a compound that can be burned) and then he added this chief formulation to a large amount of water (ratio: 1/100,000 volume/ volume). A water-based fuel was claimed to be created that could be a substitute for petrol and the cost was very cheap. He said that the water-based fuel could be produced very easily by a simple machine. One tonne of the chief formulation could be produced in 20 minutes and one tonne of the chief formulation could in turn produce 10 tonnes or more of the water-based fuel. Reference: Gregory Bassham, et al., Critical Thinking: A Students’ Introduction, 3rd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2008) 《選擇》月刊第357期(「神奇」水機健康 聲稱備受質疑) The mass media reported Wong’s invention and he demonstrated his technology to some famous scientists in China. Some presidents of the universities and senior P 190 P 191 government officials believed his invention without doubt. Some mass media claimed Wong’s invention as the Fifth Great Invention of China. For or against existent Science Concepts, Theories, Principles and Laws His invention is against the law of conservation of energy. Discussion questions: Commercial Interests / Corruptions / Flaws? Wong’s invention was widely reported in the mass media. He flew to many places like Beijing, Shanghai to demonstrate his invention. He was then appointed the head of the newly established Energy Institute of Hei Long Jiang (黑龍江). In 1987 he was commissioned 600,000 Ren Min Bi (人民幣) to produce the water-based fuel at He Bei (河北). However, more and more people became skeptical about his invention as time went by. He was finally caught in 1987 and sentenced to 10-year’s imprisonment. 1. What was Wong’s invention? [A very cheap water-based fuel produced by adding small amount of alkyne to large amount of water in the ratio 1:100,000 (V/V).] 2. What were the evidences (or what seemed to be the evidences) that supported Wong’s invention? a. He demonstrated his technology to some famous scientists in China. [It did not tell whether those famous scientists believed his invention or not] b. Some presidents of the universities and senior government officials believed his invention without doubt. [The newspaper only told us that there were some people of high rank believed in Wong’s invention but there were also some or many people who did not believe in Wong’s invention] c. Some mass media claimed Wong’s invention as the Fifth Great Invention of China.[We do not know the credibility of the mass media] Reflection questions: 1. Can you suggest some reasons why people believed in Wong’s invention? 2. How do we know that Wong’s “invention” is not real science? Explain your answer. 3. Were the evidences you read from the news sufficient to make you believe in Wong’s invention? If not, what other evidences or information you would like to get hold of before you can believe in Wong’s invention? a. Background of the “inventor” including his qualifications and career; b. His experimental procedure and exact formulation; c. Can we repeat his experiment? d. Can his invention be tested by famous universities, the government or accredited organisations? e. Any theoretical backup to his invention? Can we use existent science concepts, theories, principles or laws to explain the mechanism of his invention? Background of Wong Hung Shing Wong was born in China and received 4-year’s schooling. He had been a carpenter, soldier and a bus driver before he invented the water-based fuel. P 192 P 193 Activity 2 Read the following advertisement found in a newspaper: SUPER Water SUPER Company has a water filter that can convert tap water to SUPER WATER. SUPER Water can change ordinary water to smaller water clusters. These water clusters can pass easily through ion channels of cells. Hence, water can be absorbed faster than ordinary water molecules to keep our skin moist. The pH of the SUPER WATER is 9.5. Alkaline water can prevent people from constipation and long-term diarrhea. The dissolved oxygen content of SUPER WATER is also greater than that or dinary tap water. The higher dissolved oxygen content can improve health because it can increase the metabolic rate of cells and hence enhancing the immunity of the body. SUPER WATER Filter was invented by Dr. Kwun Lee who was an expert of water science and he is the chairman of International Research Laboratory on Water Science since 2001. The SUPER WATER filter has been accredited by NSF. The cost of the SUPER WATER Filter was HK$6,000. The filter core needs to be changed every year and the cost is HK$500. Task: 1. Do you believe the claim? Suppose you are - a customer, explain whether you believe the claim of SUPER Water filter or not. - a salesman of the SUPER company, how will you promote the SUPER Water filter to your customers? - a scientist, tell people with scientific evidences or sound reasons whether you support the claim of SUPER Water filter or not. - a representative from the Consumer Council, give advice to the consumers on the claim of SUPER Company on SUPER water. Teacher Notes: (a) The company uses a lot of scientific terms (water clusters, ion channels, cells, pH, dissolved oxygen content, metabolic rate, immunity) to describe the special feature and function of its filter. The use of such scientific terms may make people think that the claim is scientific. However, how true the claim is needs further evidence or research findings from other scientists. Now there is no further information provided by the company. P 194 (b) The company told us that the product was invented by an expert of water science and the product has been accredited by an international organisation NSF. We may check more information about the credibility of Dr Kwun Lee and the International Research Laboratory on Water Science by searching the internet. If Dr Kwun Lee has little or no research publication in high standard journals or the scale of the International Research Laboratory on Water Science is very small (say only one chairman and no other staff) the evidence of the claim would be weak. (c) Will the accreditation of NSF affect your decision to believe the claim of SUPER WATER Filter? (Remarks: NSF stands for U.S. National Sanitation Foundation Standard) This question aims to let students see how relevant the accreditation of NSF to support the claim of the product. Accreditation by NSF only shows that the production of the product matches a set of regulations set out by the NSF. However, NSF is NOT an organisation that is responsible to test or verify the claim of the product. 2. Compare science and pseudoscience. Science 1. The claim is testable and supported by scientific research recorded in high standard scientific journals. Pseudoscience The claim is not testable and there is no support from scientific research recorded in high standard scientific journals. 2. The finding does not usually contradict existing science knowledge, theories, principles and laws. The findings usually contradict existing scientific knowledge, theories, principles and laws. 3. The claim is not vague and the experimental The claim uses vague language and the result procedure is clearly written and the result can cannot be reproduced or verified. The exact be reproduced by other scientists. procedure of the experiment is not clearly provided. Other people cannot figure out what has been done and how it was done. 4. As time goes by, more research findings from other scientists give more evidence to support the claim or the theory. No concrete research findings from other scientists in the following days support the claim or the theory. Pseudoscience explains away or ignores falsifying evidence. 5. The product of the application of the science The findings are usually for selling must be tested thoroughly before marketing. commercial products with big profits. P 195 Examples of Pseudoscience Students’ Worksheet Astrology Lesson 9Pseudoscience Reasons that Astrology is not considered as real science are as follows: a. Astrological interpretations and prediction are not based on scientific theories, principles or laws but from astrological theories. b. Astrologers do not conduct carefully controlled experiments to test astrological theories. c. Astrologers use vague language to explain and predict things as well as to explain away wrong prediction. Some personality descriptions are very general and fit nearly everyone. Reference: Gregory Bassham, et al., Critical Thinking: A Students’ Introduction, 3rd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2008) 《選擇》月刊第357期(「神奇」水機健康聲稱備受質疑) Activity 1 Read the following news: The Fifth Great Invention of China A man in China called Wong Hung Shing claimed that he discovered the technology to convert water to fuel oil on 7 November, 1983. He first prepared a chief formulation that contained a small amount of alkyne (a compound that can be burned) and then he added this chief formulation to a large amount of water (ratio: 1/100,000 volume/ volume). A water-based fuel was claimed to be created that could be a substitute for petrol and the cost was very cheap. He said that the water-based fuel could be produced very easily by a simple machine. One tonne of the chief formulation could be produced in 20 minutes and one tonne of the chief formulation could in turn produce 10 tonnes or more of the water-based fuel. The mass media reported Wong’s invention and he demonstrated his technology to some famous scientists in China. Some presidents of the universities and senior government officials believed in his invention without doubt. Some mass media claimed Wong’s invention as the Fifth Great Invention of China. Discussion questions: 1. What was Wong’s invention? 2. What were the evidences (or what seemed to be the evidences) that supported Wong’s invention? P 196 P 197 3. Were the evidences you read from the news sufficient to make you believe in Wong’s invention? If not, what other evidences or information you would like to get hold of before you can believe in Wong’s invention? Activity 2 Read the following advertisement found in a newspaper: SUPER Water SUPER Company has a water filter that can convert tap water to SUPER WATER. SUPER Water can change ordinary water to smaller water clusters. These water clusters can pass easily through ion channels of cells. Hence, water can be absorbed faster than ordinary water molecules to keep our skin moist. The pH of the SUPER WATER is 9.5. Alkaline water can prevent people from constipation and long-term diarrhea. The dissolved oxygen content of SUPER WATER is also greater than that of ordinary tap water. The higher dissolved oxygen content can improve health because it can increase the metabolic rate of cells and hence enhancing the immunity of the body. SUPER WATER Filter was invented by Dr. Kwun Lee who was an expert of water science and he is the chairman of International Research Laboratory on Water Science since 2001. The SUPER WATER filter has been accredited by NSF. The cost of the SUPER WATER Filter was HK$6,000. The filter core needs to be changed every year and the cost is HK$500. Task: 1. Do you believe the claim? Suppose you are - a customer, explain whether you believe the claim of SUPER Water filter or not. - a salesman of the SUPER company, how will you promote the SUPER Water filter to your customers? - a scientist, tell people with scientific evidences or sound reasons whether you support the claim of SUPER Water filter or not. - a representative from the Consumer Council, give advice to the consumers on the claim of SUPER Company on SUPER water. 2. Compare science and pseudoscience. P 198 P 199 Snapshots of Lesson 9 and Student Products Students were required to do role play for the Activity 2 (SUPER Water) • Group Presentationby a Salesman of the SUPER Company Student Presentation • Group Presentationviews of Customers on SUPER Water • Group Presentationviews of a representative of the Consumer Council on SUPER Water • Group Presentationviews of Scientists on SUPER Water P 200 P 201 Programme Evaluation This programme was evaluated through classroom observation, student questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. It was observed that the student participants were actively involved in the classroom activities and they were motivated to learn. The teachers could act as good facilitators to help students accomplish the different tasks aimed to enhance students’ thinking skills. The learning environment was warm and all the students were encouraged to express their views. The students enjoyed the lessons very much. The student questionnaires reviewed that the students were interested in this programme and they believed that they could apply the knowledge learned to solve their daily life problems. Feedback from the interviews was very positive and encouraging. The students said that their critical thinking skills were enhanced and the teachers appreciated very much that their students could learn critical thinking skills through this programme. Finally, Dr. Chan Ho-mun, the programme consultant mentioned that the programme design was very good because the topic content could enhance higher order thinking skills and interdisciplinary learning, which in turn would benefit students’ learning in the university. To conclude, this programme can benefit the learning needs of the scientifically gifted because it provides advanced learning content, focuses on the learning process and students’ product and puts emphasis on the learning environment. “Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context” Pilot school: St Paul’s Co-educational College (2006-2007) Student Questionnaire Date:_____________ The purpose of this questionnaire is to collect your opinions and feedback to improve the course content and the teaching methodology so that the learning needs of the highly able students can be catered. Put a tick in an appropriate box (i.e.) to indicate the degree of your agreement with each of the following statements. Your answers are completely anonymous. Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. I like this course. 2. This course was more interesting compared with the traditional lesson. 3. We were free to choose the ways (e.g. by text, drawing or other methods) we like to finish assignments. 4. We had enough time to participate in discussions during the course. 5. I learned the critical thinking skills from this course. 6. My teacher encouraged me to express my own ideas 7. We were required to solve the problem on our own. 8. My critical thinking skill is improved upon completion of this course. 9. I actively participated in this course. 10. On the whole, I was satisfied with the course contents and activities in this course. State the reasons why you like/ dislike this course. What are your suggestions about this course? Thank you P 202 P 203 “Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science Context” Pilot school: St Paul’s Co-educational College (2006-2007) Extract from Students’ Questionnaires conducted on 27/ 6 / 07 State the reasons why you like/ dislike this course. 1. Useful. 2. This course is interesting compared with the normal class and I find it useful. 3. I can learn more knowledge. 4. Interesting. We can cooperate with different classmates and share our opinions during discussion. 5. Novel questions. We can understand science more. 6. Relaxed. 7. Very interesting and interactive teaching in the classroom. We are free to express our own opinions. 8. Because it is interesting. 9. I like it because I can learn science knowledge which cannot be learnt from normal lessons. 10. I like it because it is interactive and fun. Very different from classes at school. 11. Interactive, interesting. 12. It is useful for science lessons. 13. I learn much from this course. My classmates are highly capable. 14. The course is interactive. I have a chance to discuss with others. 15. I can apply the knowledge to solve the daily problems. 16. The course is fruitful. 17. The activities are creative and interesting. What are your suggestions about this course? 1. The lesson is too short so that some concepts cannot be fully explained. 2. If the lesson is longer, students can explain some other science questions to their classmates. 3. The teaching approach of this course can be applied to the normal lessons. 4. Try to arrange this course in another time (but not after school). The only reason that I don’t like the course is that I’m under the impression that it occupied my personal time. P 204 P 205 Links of the Interview Videos Behavioral Checklist of Students with High Potential in Sciences Name of Student:_________________________ Class:_______ Interview with Dr. Chan Ho Mun http://resources.edb.gov.hk/gifted/tr/thinking_skills/ (Programme evaluation) Interview with Students http://resources.edb.gov.hk/gifted/tr/thinking_skills/ (Programme evaluation) Item Behavioral Checklist Never Sometimes Frequently Almost Always 1 Show intense interest in science even during the pre-school years and have science hobbies (e.g. enjoy reading science books, fiction, magazines, TV programmes; active participation in the science club and science competitions; pay frequent visits to science museums; enjoy collecting plant & animal specimens like a collector, taking walks in nature and carry out special science projects of their own at home) 2 Very knowledgeable in science information besides textbook knowledge (e.g. science tricks and science in everyday life) 3 Want to know how things work / why things happen and find satisfaction in thinking about and discussing scientific affairs 4 Have a critical mind – would use combinations of evidence and science theories and principles to question other people’s conclusions (including their teacher’s) P 206 Age:____ Please give a “tick” against those options that best describe the characteristics of the student. Interview with Teachers http://resources.edb.gov.hk/gifted/tr/thinking_skills/ (Programme evaluation) Sex:_______ P 207 Item Behavioral Checklist Never Sometimes Frequently Almost Always 5 Understand abstract science concepts at an earlier age and can make good connections between facts and concepts learned 6 Be able to use more extensive science vocabulary than their peers 7 Willing to pass up entertainment such as games and TV programmes in favour of scientific pursuits 8 Prefer science related careers 9 Be self-motivated in learning science and like to challenge self to try different strategies to solve science problems and persist until the problem is solved (willing to spend long periods working alone) 10 11 12 Creative in science, daydreamers, like to solve mental puzzles, and are able to brainstorm many methods to solve a problem and be able to make priorities for the methods Good at carrying out scientific investigation - be able to create a new or clearer definition of the problem, devise new and more efficient or effective methods to solve a science problem, able to formulate hypotheses and conduct experiments carefully. With good laboratory skills and be able to improvise for experiments. Item Behavioral Checklist Never Sometimes 13 Good at numerical analysis, measurement and data analysis - be able to apply concepts of reliability and validity in analysing the experimental result 14 Be able to evaluate own experimental design, suggest modifications to experimental design and make appropriate conclusion 15 Won school / inter-school / international awards in science competitions and demonstrate high quality work (such as creativity and higher order thinking skills) in science projects/assignments at school 16 Usually have better-than-average ability in Mathematics; many are also good at mathematics and chess Frequently Almost Always Remarks: (1) School science teachers may fill out the checklist for students and compare the number of items with ticks in the Frequently and/or Almost Always columns. Then, those students who have more ticks in the Almost Always column should be strongly recommended for the school-based gifted programmes. (2) Teachers are advised to use multiple methods and channels (such as classroom observation, parent/peer group/self recommendation, students’ products and assignments, awards in local and/or international science competitions, etc.) to select students with higher potential in science to school-based programmes for the scientifically gifted students. A single test/identification tool is not reliable in the identification of a scientifically gifted student. (3) Teachers should not neglect those underachievers with high potential in science. Many studies show that a challenging curriculum may reverse the underachievement of the gifted underachievers. P 208 P 209 References: References: McGinnis, J.R. & Stefanich, G.P. (2007). Special Needs and Talents in Science Learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (eds.) Handbook of Research on Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers. Website of Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, UK (Identifying gifted pupils: Science) (retrieved from http://www.qca.org.uk/qca_2184.aspx on 3 October 2007) Feldhusen, J.F., Hoover, S.M.H. & Sayler, M.F. (1991). Identification and Educating Gifted Students in Secondary Level. Australia: Hawker Brownlow Education. Fliegler, L.A. (1961). Curriculum Planning for the gifted. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Angela Melamed (2005) Resources for Science for Public Understanding (T9.6/ Genetic Engineering/Chapter 7/page 1), http://www.scpub.org Benny H. W. Yung (2006) Learning from TIMSS: Implications for Teaching and Learning Science at the Junior Secondary Level. Hong Kong: Education Bureau. Gregory Bassham, William Irwin, Henry Nardone & James M. Wallace (2008) Critical Thinking: A Student’s Introduction (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Peter Castro & Michael E. Huber (2005) Marine Biology (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Richard Gott & Sandra Duggan (2007) Understanding and Using Scientific Evidence. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Stephen S. Carey (1998) A Beginner’s Guide To Scientific Method(2nd ed.). California: Wadsworth Publishing Company. 方子華、陳浩文、盧傑雄、陳晧崴、楊國榮、余錦波 (2005) 《批判思考》 ,新加坡:McGraw-Hill Education (Asia)。 王溢然、張耀久 (2001) 《類比》,台灣:凡異出版社。 香港消費者委員會:《選擇》(第357期(「神奇」水機健康聲稱備受質疑)) ,香港:消費者委員會,2006年7月 。(https://choice.yp.com.hk/consumer_ council/ch/html/main.aspx) Recommended Book List: Anne Thomson (2006) Critical Reasoning: A Practical Introduction. London: Routledge. Linda Elder & Richard Paul (2007) The Thinker’s Guide to Analytic Thinking. California: The Foundation for Critical Thinking. Richard Paul & Linda Elder (2006) A Miniature Guide for Students and Faculty to Scientific Thinking. California: The Foundation for Critical Thinking. 岳燕寧 (2001) 《歸納與演繹》,台灣:凡異出版社。 P 210 P 211