Employer Expectations for Legal Research Skills Elaine M. Egan, Manager Information Center Shearman & Sterling February 18, 2014 Challenges 3/6/2014 Development of countless electronic content resources Unprecedented pressure to run a law firm like a business Complex global markets Higher levels of service, efficiency, and cost containment 2 Effective Approach to Legal Research – the basics ASK QUESTIONS - understand your assignment Ask about specific resources (not all sources are equal) If you must GOOGLE 10 minute rule Validate results Valid sources effective, legally binding or able to withstand objection Yahoo Finance 2/14/14 Close: 79.23 Volume: 7,001.100 Bloomberg 2/14/14 3/6/2014 Close: 79.23 Volume: 7.003 3 Business Acumen and Knowledge Management 3/6/2014 Understanding of the financial, accounting, marketing and operational functions of an organization Understand your client and their industry Organizations generate value from their intellectual and knowledge-based assets Share Innovate Reuse Collaborate Learn 4 Efficiency Legal Project Management Project management approach 3/6/2014 the process and activity of planning, organizing, motivating, and controlling resources to achieve specific outcomes Scope Deadlines Project team Costs 5 FFF Faculty Webcast - Employer Expectations for Legal Research Skills Faculty Update Lexis Advance® New Enhancements Guest Speakers Sally Wise, Library Director, University of Miami School of Law Elaine Egan, Manager, Department of Information & Knowledge Services, Shearman & Sterling Julie Jones, Branch Librarian, United States Courts Library, Second Circuit Agenda • AALL Principles & Standards for Research Competencies • Employer Expectations - Large Law Firm perspective • Employer Expectations – Federal Court perspective • LexisNexis Law Schools- “prepare to practice” resources • Q&A LexisNexis® Think Like a Lawyer Resources • On Demand Learning tools - Law School You Tube channel - Reference pieces • Rebooting Legal Research in a Digital Age, by Steve Lastres • Professional Research Certification • Cost Effective Research classes • Think Like a Lawyer (TLAL) Microsite LexisNexis® Faculty Home page – www.lexisnexis.com/lawschool Think Like a Lawyer – www.lexisnexis.com/tlal Think Like a Lawyer – www.lexisnexis.com/tlal QUESTIONS Employer Expectations for Legal Research Skills: Working in the Federal Courts Julie M. Jones U.S. Courts Library, Second Circuit Hartford, CT julie_jones@ca2.uscourts.gov Primary Tasks of Law Clerks • • • • • • Critical thinking Case law research Statutory and rule based research Jury instructions Sentencing Drafting court memoranda and opinions Case Law • Advanced search techniques – Boolean queries – Field/Segment searching • Leverage the full power of Westlaw Next and Lexis Advance filters • Finesse Keycite and Shepard results Statutes and Rules • Advanced filtering of citations to statutes and use of annotated codes • Federal Rules of Civil & Criminal Procedure • Local Court Rules • Judge Rules Jury Instructions • Sand’s Modern Federal Jury Instructions preferred in the Second Circuit • What is the difference between Sand’s or O’Malley’s and pattern jury instructions? • How current are pattern jury instructions? Federal Sentencing Guidelines • What are they? • How are sentences calculated? • What about crack cocaine? Format: Print or Online? • Content matters, not form Questions? Thank you! AALL PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS FOR LEGAL RESEARCH COMPETENCY Promoting the AALL Principles and Standards for Legal Research Competency Task Force Sally Wise, University of Miami School of Law Mary Jenkins, Hamilton County Law Library Catherine Lemann, Alaska Supreme Court Librarian, Retired Gail Partin, Dickinson School of Law, Pennsylvania State University Linda-Jean Schneider, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP Jean Wenger, Cook County Law Library AALL Principles And Standards For Legal Research Competency will provide value to the legal profession Value to the Legal Profession • To foster best practices in law school curriculum development and design; • To inform law firm planning, training, evaluation, and articulation of core competencies; • To encourage bar admission committee evaluation of applicants' research skills; • To inspire continuing education program development; and, • To impact law school accreditation standards review. The Principles I. A successful legal researcher possesses foundational knowledge of the legal system and legal information sources. II. A successful legal researcher gathers information through effective and efficient research strategies. III. A successful legal researcher critically evaluates information. IV. A successful legal researcher applies information effectively to resolve a specific issue or need. V. A successful legal researcher distinguishes between ethical and unethical uses of information, and understands the legal issues associated with the discovery, use, or application of information. Hierarchy of the PSLRC Principles Standards Competencies The Concern Where can I find the USC? I need to look up a regulation. The Response Principle I: A successful legal researcher possesses foundational knowledge of the legal system and legal information sources Standard B: An information-literate legal professional understands the similarities, differences, and interrelationships among and between United States federal, state, and local legal systems. Competency 3: Identifies appropriate resources to locate the legislative, regulatory, and judicial law produced by the respective government bodies. The Concern Where are those state bankruptcy filings? The Response Principle II: A successful legal researcher gathers information through effective and efficient research strategies. Standard A: An information-literate legal professional selects appropriate research sources. Competency 2: Recognizes the authority or authorities governing particular legal issues. The Concern There has to be a better way to filter these research results! The Response Principle II: A successful legal researcher gathers information through effective and efficient research strategies. Standard C: An information-literate legal professional confirms and validates research results, incorporating existing work product and expertise. Competency 4: Understands when to stop the research process. The Concern The Response Principle IV: A successful legal researcher gathers information through effective and efficient research strategies. Standard A: An information-literate legal professional synthesizes research problems in an analytical approach to legal research. Competency 1: Synthesizes legal doctrine by examining cases similar, but not identical, to cases that are the current focus of research, in order to articulate how courts should apply current authoritative and relevant case law. AALL – Research Instruction Caucus AALL Special Committee - Fostering Legal Research as a Subject Specialty Boulder Statement : 2009 & 2010 Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) Value to the Legal Profession • To foster best practices in law school curriculum development and design; • To inform law firm planning, training, evaluation, and articulation of core competencies; • To encourage bar admission committee evaluation of applicants' research skills; • To inspire continuing education program development; and, • To impact law school accreditation standards review. PSLRC in instruction & assessment Instruction Assessment Law Schools ABA Learning Outcome Standard Law Firms Bar Exam CLE Providers Performance Evaluation SelfAssessment Standard 302 - Learning Outcomes (coming soon) A law school shall establish learning outcomes that shall, at a minimum, include competency in the following: (b) Legal analysis and reasoning, legal research, problem solving, and written and oral communication in the legal context; Research questions on the Bar Exam! Bar exam questions • Characteristics of primary law • Characteristics of secondary legal information • Primary legal sources • Secondary legal sources • Relative weight of authority • Statutory construction • Citation verification • Application of ethics rules to research • Documenting research strategies • Efficiency and cost • Evaluation of sources Lawyer performance evaluation Does the associate consider costs to the client and the firm when completing research assignments? (Principle III, Standard B.) Is the associate able to resolve all questions posed and provide sufficient support for conclusions reached? (Principle IV, Standard C.) Your feedback • AALL Legal Research Competency webpage at http://www.aallnet.org/mainmenu/Advocacy/legalresearchcompetency • Share Your ideas • Connect • Learn • Read • Outreach • What’s New