2012 Sustainability Reporting
of the World’s Largest Food Processing Companies
Pacific Sustainability Index Scores:
A benchmarking tool for online sustainability reporƟng
Ajinomoto, Archer Daniels Midland,
Associated British Foods BRF Brasil
Olam International, Saputo, Smithfield
Foods, Tyson Foods, Unilever, and
Wilmar
International
The Roberts Environmental Center has been
the foremost analyst of corporate sustainability
reporting for over a decade. We analyze
corporate online disclosure using our Pacific
Sustainability Index (PSI) and publish the results
online.
Contents
Topics
Company Rankings
Lead Analyst’s Commentary
PSI Overview
PSI Scoring in a Nutshell
Sector Performance
Visual Cluster Analysis
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Environmental Intent Scores Ranking
Environmental Reporting Scores Ranking
Environmental Performance Scores
Ranking
Social Intent Scores Ranking
Social Reporting Scores Ranking
Social Performance Scores Ranking
Human Rights Reporting Element
Performance by Country
Relationship Between PSI Scores and
Financial Variables
Explicit numerical goals Reported
Topics Showing Performance
Improvement over Previous Year Data
Topics in which Performance was Better
than Sector Average
Commentaries alphabetically listed by
company name
Appendix: PSI Questionnaire
Page
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
The goal of corporate report analysis
conducted by the Roberts Environmental
Center is to acquaint students with
environmental and social issues facing the
world’s industries, and the ways in which
industry approaches and resolves these issues.
The data presented in this report were
collected by students at the Roberts
Environmental Center:
15
16
17
18
19
20
Lead Analyst
Hilary Haskell
Simone Berkovitz
23
28
Sustainability Management Analyst
Katherine Recinos
35
37
Environmental Analyst
Samuel Kahr
130
Questions should be addressed to:
Social and Human Rights Analyst
Isabel Lane
Dr. J. Emil Morhardt, Director
(emorhardt@cmc.edu, 909-621-8190)
Special Project Manager
Lucas Van Houten
Elgeritte Adidjaja, Research Fellow
(eadidjaja@cmc.edu, 909-621-8698)
Media/Public Relation
Quinn Chasan
Sierra Gibson
Jacob Shimkus
Roberts Environmental Center
Claremont McKenna College
925 N. Mills Ave.
Claremont, CA 91711-5916
USA
Copyright 2013 © by J. Emil Morhardt. All rights
reserved.
www.roberts.cmc.edu
2
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Company Rankings
Danone Group
61.86
Campbell Soup Co.
A+
AB+
B+
B+
B+
B+
B+
B+
B+
B
B
BBBBC+
C
C
C
C
CCCD+
D
D
D
DF
50.95
Smith�ield Foods
50.94
Ajinomoto
50.93
H.J. Heinz Company
49.56
Nestlé
48.88
Kellogg
48.55
Golden Agri
47.18
ConAgra Foods
46.64
Hershey
45.04
Kraft Foods
43.03
Hormel Foods
41.52
Tyson Foods
39.27
Associated British
38.39
General Mills
37.30
Grupo Bimbo
36.76
Wilmar International
32.30
Dean Foods
31.88
Bunge
31.19
Archer Daniels
30.63
Corn Products Inc.
25.81
Kerry Group
24.88
Olam International
23.24
J. M. Smuckers
20.08
Saputo
Company Name
Danone Group
Campbell Soup Co.
Unilever
Smithfield Foods
Ajinomoto
H.J. Heinz Company
Nestlé
Kellogg
Golden Agri-Resources
ConAgra Foods
Hershey
Kraft Foods
Hormel Foods Corporation
Tyson Foods
Associated British Foods
General Mills
Grupo Bimbo
Wilmar International
Dean Foods
Bunge
Archer Daniels Midland
Corn Products Inc.
Kerry Group
Olam International
J. M. Smuckers
Saputo
Hillshire Brands.
McCormick & Co
BRF-Brasil Foods
JBS
Cou
France
United States
Netherlands
United States
Japan
United States
Switzerland
United States
Singapore
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United Kingdom
United States
Mexico
Singapore
United States
Bermuda
United States
United States
Ireland
Singapore
United States
Canada
United States
United States
Brazil
Brazi l
15.30
Hillshire Brands.
15.18
McCormick & Co
14.41
BRF-Brasil Foods
JBS
Grade
51.59
Unilever
12.49
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
6.09
20
40
60
80
100
3
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Lead Analyst’s
Commentary
Simone Berkovitz ‘14
C
orporate social and
environmental
responsibility is extremely
important for companies in
the food processing sector
due to direct health impacts on consumers
and the environmental impacts from
production and sourcing. According to our
2012 Pacific Sustainability Index (PSI)
Scoring, the food processing sector overall
was very competitive, with many of the
companies receiving similar scores. The top
scoring companies were Danone Group and
Campbell Soup Co. due to clear, detailed,
and comprehensive reporting. While the
lowest scoring companies BRF-Brasil Foods
and JBS failed to demonstrate a
commitment to environmental and social
responsibility. The top reported
environmental topics included
environmental vision statements, energy
usage, green food purchasing, and
sustainable agriculture. The top reported
social topics included occupational health
and safety, access to health care for
employees, and community development.
Green food purchasing is an extremely
important topic in the food processing
sector. “Green food purchasing” is defined
by food purchased that comes from organic
sources or sustainable farms or sustainable
fisheries. Green food purchasing is both an
environmental and health concern. Almost
all of the reports addressed nutrition,
health, and green issues, in which green
food purchasing initiatives fell under both
categories. Danone names health and
nature as its top strategic priorities, under
www.roberts.cmc.edu
4
which several green food purchasing
initiatives are outlined. For example, the
“sustainable milk program” includes local
organic milk as well as farm assessments in
order to ensure health and environmental
benefits. Campbell Soup Co. recently
developed organic, and all-natural products
in order to promote health and wellness as
well as better environmental practices.
Similarly, top scoring company, Unilever
outlines green food purchasing practices as
part of their “Sustainable Living Plan” which
includes both health and environmental
impact initiatives. Across the food
processing sector, companies have
recognized the importance of green food
purchasing due to a rise in consumer
demand for these products.
In conjunction with green food
purchasing, sustainable agriculture and food
sourcing are critical issues in the food
processing sector. In particular, one of the
biggest environmental concerns is sourcing
of palm oil. Palm oil is an edible vegetable
oil derived from the fruit of oil palms, found
mostly in the tropics of Africa, Southeast
Asia, and parts of Brazil. The use of palm oil
in the food processing industry has risen in
the past years due to its use as a
replacement for trans fats. However, palm
oil production poses a significant
environmental threat due to widespread
deforestation. Specifically in parts of
Indonesia, natural forests are being
removed in order to make space for oilpalm monoculture and as a result the
Sumatran Orangutan has become critically
endangered. Due to these serious
environmental concerns many companies
that use palm oil have reported changing
their practices to be more sustainable. For
example, Nestle’s report details a
commitment to use traceable sustainable
palm oil in order to minimize deforestation.
Nestle emphasizes a commitment to
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
sustainability across the supply chain for
both agricultural commodities and
packaging products.
When sourcing raw materials, food
processing companies directly impact the
local communities and often indigenous
populations. Local communities can be both
positively and negatively affected by the
food processing sector. Communities often
benefit from the increased agricultural
exports, but can also be hurt by
externalities such as deforestation or toxic
waste. 52% of the companies we scored
discussed local community development
initiatives and 20% of companies mentioned
measures regarding indigenous people.
Companies reported a wide range of
development initiatives both company
sponsored and in partnership with local
NGOs, such as access to drinking water,
educational programs, farmer capacity
building, entrepreneurship development,
reforestation, and more. Additionally,
several companies discussed working to
protect the rights of indigenous people,
violations, and actions taken to avoid future
violations. It is apparent across the sector
that corporations recognize their impact on
local communities and are taking steps to
internalize negative externalities.
One of the most pressing
environmental issues in the food processing
sector is waste management. Most
companies presented data on waste and
discussed recycling efforts. 37% of
companies we scored presented “Zero
Waste” policies and initiatives in order to
demonstrate a commitment to waste
management and recycling. “Zero Waste”
means the routine manufacturing waste is
recycled or converted to energy, instead of
taken to a landfill. One notable “Zero
Waste” initiative was Hershey’s waste-toenergy food waste incinerators, which not
only decrease waste taken to landfills, but
www.roberts.cmc.edu
5
also provide a valuable energy source,
reducing fossil fuel reliance. ConAgra
reported similar approaches, along with a
partnership with a local hunger NGO
where food was donated instead of going to
waste.
Overall, the food processing sector has
shown great improvement in both social
and environmental responsibility. CSR
reports are significantly longer and more
detailed than in previous years. Driven by
rising social and environmental standards
and consumer demand, corporations have
recognized the necessity to change their
practices.
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
The Pacific Sustainability Index (PSI) Overview
The PSI Scoring System
What do the Score Means?
The Paci�ic Sustainability Index (PSI) uses a systematic
questionnaire to analyze the quality of the overall industry
corporate sustainability reporting (CSR), as well as the
individual companies' CSRs. Sample companies are the
largest corporations listed by the current Forbes list. This
report provides a summary �indings of CSR analyses
conducted by a team of undergraduate students of the
Claremont Colleges--mostly of Claremont McKenna College
of which Roberts Environmental Center was founded--for
a semester-long research--typically a four month period.
The assigned team pre-selected the topics for current
analysis from the preliminary review of the downloaded
reports, based on the topic's prevalence to the sector and
relevance to the current issues faced by the industry.
We normalize all the scores to the potential maximum
score. Scores of subsets of the overall score are also
normalized to their potential maxima. The letter grades
(A+, A, A-, B+, etc.), however, are normalized to the highest
scoring company analyzed in the report. Grades of
individual companies in the report might be different from
grades posted online on the Roberts Environmental
Center's website, since the normalization of scores of an
individual company online is not limited to the companies
analyzed in the sector report, but also includes other
companies of the same sector irrespective of the year of
analysis.
Scores and Ranks
We offer the opportunity for all companies/institutions
analyzed in this report to give answers to the PSI
questionnaire we are using, as long as the source of
information provided are publicly available online. Our
analysts would go through the website analyzing the same
questionnaire, irrespective of the response, and merge the
results. After scoring is �inalized, we issue a draft report
and make it available for companies’ review. We
encourage all companies to provide feedback and should it
put out additional new online materials within the
publication timeline, we will incorporate the new
information into our analysis. We will use the contact
information speci�ied online or provided in the report for
these purposes, however, if the contact information is not
provided, we will write a letter to the Public Relation Staff
of the company requesting a review our report prior to
publication. When response is not received in the time,
usually within four weeks, we will publish the results
without company’s review.
Companies with scores in the highest 4% get an A+ and
any in the bottom 4% get an F. We assign these by dividing
the maximum PSI score obtained in the sector into 12
equal parts then rounding fractional score up or down.
This means that A+ and F are under-represented
compared to the other grades. The same technique applies
to the separate categories of environmental and social
scores. Thus, we grade on the curve. We assume that the
highest score obtained in the sector and any scores near it
represent the state-of-the-art for that sector and deserve
an A+.
Methodology
The team downloads revelant English languages web
pages from the main corporate website for the �irst month
of analysis and convert them into a PDF format, then a
survey of topics for inclusion in the questionnaire is
underway. Data exclusively and independently available
outside the main corporate website are omitted to keep
transparancy score only to include innate information
provided by the company. Although we aim to be
objective in our analysis, our analysts are encouraged to
expressed their subjective view of what they see in the
report, allowing creativity to permeate in the individual
analyzes of companies and the industry-wide reporting of
topics.
The Roberts Environmental Center
The Roberts Environmental Center is an environmental research institute at Claremont McKenna College (CMC). Its
mission is to provide students of all the Claremont Colleges with a comprehensive and realistic understanding of today’s
environmental issues and the ways in which they are being and can be resolved--beyond the con�ines of traditional
academic disciplines and curriculum--and to identify, publicize, and encourage policies and practices that achieve
economic and social goals in the most environmentally benign and protective manner. The Center is partially funded by
an endowment from George R. Roberts (Founding Partner of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Co. and CMC alumnus), other
grants and gifts, and is staffed by faculty and students from the Claremont Colleges.
www.roberts.cmc.edu
6
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
PSI Scoring in a Nutshell
Types of Information
3. Performance
Our analysis of sustainability reporting are divided into
environmental and social categories—the latter including
human rights—and into three types of information: 1)
intent, 2) reporting, and 3) performance.
1. Intent
The “Intent” topics are each worth two points; one point
for a discussion of intentions, vision, or plans, and one
point for evidence of specific actions taken to implement
them.
For each “Reporting” topic, two performance points are
available.
For quantitative topics, one point is given for
improvement from the previous reporting period, and
one point for better performance than the sector average
(based on the data used for this sector report normalized
by revenue).
For qualitative topics, we give one point for any
indication of improvement from previous reporting
periods, and one point for perspective.
2. Reporting
The “Reporting” topics are each worth five points and are
either quantitative (for which we expect numerical data)
or qualitative (for which we don’t).
For quantitative topics, one point is available for a
discussion, one point for putting the information into
perspective (i.e. awards, industry standards, competitor
performance, etc., or if the raw data are normalized by
dividing by revenue, number of employees, number of
widgets produced, etc.), one point for the presence of an
explicit numerical goal, one point for numerical data from
a single year, and one point for similar data from a
previous year.
The “human rights” topics are scored differently, with five
“reporting” points; 2.5 points for formally adopting a
policy or standard and 2.5 points for a description of
monitoring measures. In addition, there are two
“performance” points; one point for evidence of actions to
reinforce policy and one point for a quantitative
indication of compliance.
For qualitative topics, there are three criteria summed up
to five points: 1.67 points for discussion, 1.67 points for
initiatives or actions, and 1.67 points for perspective.
Distribution of Scores by Topics
Social,
Human Rights
16%
Environmental
, Intent
22%
Social,
Qualitative
11%
Social,
Quantitative
10%
Environmental
, Quantitative
20%
Social, Intent
19%
www.roberts.cmc.edu
7
Environmental
, Qualitative
2%
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Danone Group
Campbell Soup Co.
Unilever
Smithfield Foods
Ajinomoto
H.J. Heinz Company
Nestlé
Kellogg
Golden Agri-Resources
ConAgra Foods
Hershey
Kraft Foods
Hormel Foods Corporation
Tyson Foods
Associated British Foods
General Mills
Grupo Bimbo
Wilmar International
Dean Foods
Bunge
Archer Daniels Midland
Corn Products Inc.
Kerry Group
Olam International
J. M. Smuckers
Saputo
Hillshire Brands.
McCormick & Co
BRF-Brasil Foods
JBS
-5
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
Sector Performance
E n v ir o n m e n ta l
S o c ia l
O v e r a ll
Each vertical-line—sorted by the companies with the highest to lowest overall PSI scores—illustrates
the range of the total environmental and social score of each company, divided right in the center with a
tick-mark, which is also the PSI overall score. The longer the line, shows the larger discrepancies
between the amount of the environmental or social topics reported.
Discriptive Statistics of
the Overall Environmental, Social, and PSI Scores
Environmental Score
Social Score
Overall Score
Maximum Score
56.67
67.05
61.86
Minimum Score
9.17
1.97
6.09
Standard Deviation
14.54
16.11
14.39
Average Score (mean)
33.85
37.61
35.73
www.roberts.cmc.edu
8
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Visual Cluster Analysis
Visual cluster analysis multivariate data of the sort produced by the PSI are difficult to summarize. Here we have
created radar diagrams of the performance of each company analyzed in the sector by its environmental and social
intent, reporting, and performance sorted by company ranking. Maximum scores will match the outer sides of the
hexagon, which total up to 100 percent. A proportional spider-web shape suggests a balance of reporting in all areas.
EI = Environmental Intent, ER = Environmental Reporting, EP = Environmental Performance
SI = Social Intent, SR = Social Reporting, SP = Social Performance
ER
EI
ER
EP
EI
ER
EP
EI
ER
EP
ER
EI
EP
EI
EP
-1E
-1E
-1E
-1E
-1E
+2 6
+2 6
+2 6
+2 6
+2 6
3
3
3
3
SI
SP
SI
SP
SR
SP
SR
Danone Group
EP
EI
-1E
EP
EI
+2 6
EP
SP
SR
ER
EI
EI
+2 6
3
SI
SP
SI
SP
SR
Golden AgriResources
ER
EI
EP
-1E
SR
Kellogg
EP
EI
3
SP
ER
EP
EP
SR
Nestlé
ER
+2 6
SI
SR
H.J. Heinz
Company
Ajinomoto
-1E
3
SI
SR
EI
+2 6
3
SP
SP
ER
-1E
+2 6
3
SI
Smithfield Foods
ER
-1E
SI
SP
SR
Unilever
ER
3
SI
SR
Campbell Soup
Co.
ER
EI
SI
ConAgra Foods
ER
EP
ER
EI
EP
EI
EP
-1E
-1E
-1E
-1E
-1E
+2 6
+2 6
+2 6
+2 6
+2 6
3
3
SI
SP
SP
SR
SP
EP
EI
-1E
EP
EI
+2 6
EP
SP
SR
ER
EI
EP
EI
EI
3
SP
SI
SP
SR
Dean Foods
ER
EP
+2 6
SI
SR
Wilmar
International
ER
EP
-1E
3
SP
SR
Grupo Bimbo
EI
+2 6
SI
SR
General Mills
EP
-1E
3
SI
Associated British
Foods
ER
EI
+2 6
3
SP
SP
ER
-1E
+2 6
3
SI
SR
Tyson Foods
ER
-1E
SI
SP
SR
Hormel Foods
Corporation
ER
3
SI
SR
Kraft Foods
ER
3
SI
SR
Hershey
EI
3
SI
Bunge
ER
EP
EI
ER
EP
EI
EP
-1E
-1E
-1E
-1E
-1E
+2 6
+2 6
+2 6
+2 6
+2 6
3
3
SI
SP
SP
SR
SP
EP
EI
SP
EI
SP
SR
Olam International
ER
EP
SI
SR
Kerry Group
ER
3
SI
SR
Corn Products Inc.
ER
3
SI
SR
Archer Daniels
Midland
EI
3
SI
J. M. Smuckers
ER
EP
EI
ER
EP
EI
EP
-1E
-1E
-1E
-1E
-1E
+2 6
+2 6
+2 6
+2 6
+2 6
3
3
3
3
SI
SP
SR
Hillshire Brands.
www.roberts.cmc.edu
SI
SP
SI
SP
SR
Saputo
SR
McCormick & Co
9
3
SI
SP
SR
SI
SP
SR
BRF-Brasil Foods
JBS
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Percentage of Companies Addressing Environmental Topics
Biodiversity
0.31
0.41
Climate change/global warming
0.52
(total)Energy used
0.09
Environmental accounting
0.24
Environmental education
0.29
Environmental expenses and investments
0.36
Environmental impediments and challenges
0.41
Environmental management structure
0.43
Environmental management system
0.52
Environmental policy statement
0.60
Environmental visionary statement
0.17
(environmental)Fines
0.37
Food Waste
0.47
Genetically modified food
0.77
Green food purchasing
0.33
Green purchasing
0.20
Green transportation initiatives
0.50
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
0.33
Locally grown organic food
0.33
0.24
(environmental)Notices of violation
0.50
Reforestation
0.43
Renewable energy used
0.38
Report contact person
0.43
Stakeholder consultation
0.19
Waste (hazardous) produced
0.03
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0.12
Waste (office) recycled
0.47
Waste (solid) disposed of
0.48
Waste recycled: solid waste
0.52
Water used
0.37
Zero Waste Policy
0%
www.roberts.cmc.edu
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
10
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Percentage of Companies
Addressing Social and Human Rights Topics
Access to health care for employees
0.53
Anti-corruption practices
0.34
Bribery
0.34
0.41
Code of conduct or business ethics
0.52
Community development
0.41
Community education
0.24
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
Effective abolition of child labor
0.36
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
0.36
0.34
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
0.22
Emergency preparedness program
0.24
Employee satisfaction surveys
0.41
Employee training for career development
0.24
Employee turnover rate
0.43
Employee volunteerism
0.10
Employment for individuals w ith disabilities
0.31
Fair compensation of employees
0.36
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
0.09
Health and safety citations
0.07
Health and safety fines
0.33
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
0.20
Indigenous people
0.40
Lost w orkday case rate
0.52
Occupational health and safety protection
0.31
Political contributions
0.21
Reasonable w orking hours
0.43
Recordable incident/accident rate
0.40
Sexual harassment
0.40
Social community investment
0.21
Social impediments and challenges
0.34
Social policy statement
0.45
Social visionary statement
/Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance
supplier management
Sustainable agriculture
0.47
0.80
0.26
Third-party validation
0.28
Women in management
Workforce profile: age
0.12
0.22
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0.26
Workforce profile: gender
0%
www.roberts.cmc.edu
11
10%
20% 30% 40%
50% 60% 70% 80%
90% 100%
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Intent Rankings
Danone Group
General Mills
81.25
H.J. Heinz Company
78.13
Campbell Soup Co.
78.13
ConAgra Foods
78.13
Hershey
78.13
Associated British
71.88
Kellogg
71.88
Golden Agri
68.75
Kraft Foods
68.75
Smith�ield Foods
68.75
Unilever
Nestlé
62.50
Wilmar
68.75
62.50
Dean Foods
59.38
Archer Daniels
56.25
Bunge
50.00
Grupo Bimbo
50.00
J. M. Smuckers
50.00
Olam International
50.00
Tyson Foods
46.88
Corn Products Inc.
43.75
Kerry Group
Hormel Foods
Saputo
25.00
JBS
Grade
A+
AAAAAAB+
B+
B
B
B
B
BBBBC+
C+
C+
C+
C
C
C
CD
DDDF
81.25
Ajinomoto
43.75
40.63
Company Name
Danone Group
General Mills
H.J. Heinz Company
Ajinomoto
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Hershey
Associated British Foods
Kellogg
Golden Agri-Resources
Kraft Foods
Smithfield Foods
Unilever
Nestlé
Wilmar International
Dean Foods
Archer Daniels Midland
Bunge
Grupo Bimbo
J. M. Smuckers
Olam International
Tyson Foods
Corn Products Inc.
Kerry Group
Hormel Foods Corporation
Saputo
JB S
McCormick & Co
BRF-Brasil Foods
Hillshire Brands.
Count
France
United States
United States
Japan
United States
United States
United States
United Kingdom
United States
Singapore
United States
United States
Netherlands
Switzerland
Singapore
United States
United States
Bermuda
Mexico
United States
Singapore
United States
United States
Ireland
United States
Canada
Brazi l
United States
Brazil
United States
18.75
McCormick & Co
18.75
BRF-Brasil Foods
Hillshire Brands.
93.75
15.63
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
9.38
20
40
60
80
12
100
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Reporting Rankings
Ajinomoto
57.08
Smith�ield Foods
55.42
Danone Group
51.25
Campbell Soup Co.
H.J. Heinz Company
A++
A+
A
A
A
AAAB+
B+
B+
B
B
B
BC+
C+
C+
C
D+
D+
D+
D
D
DDDDDD-
49.17
Nestlé
45.83
Hershey
44.58
Kellogg
44.58
ConAgra Foods
44.17
General Mills
44.17
Hormel Foods
41.25
Dean Foods
40.00
Golden Agri-Resources
38.75
Associated British Foods
37.92
Bunge
35.42
Grupo Bimbo
31.67
Unilever
30.42
Kraft Foods
28.75
Tyson Foods
27.92
Archer Daniels Midland
20.00
J. M. Smuckers
17.92
Wilmar International
17.92
Hillshire Brands.
15.42
Olam International
14.17
Saputo
11.67
Corn Products Inc.
11.25
McCormick & Co
10.00
BRF-Brasil Foods
Company Name
Ajinomoto
Smithfield Foods
Danone Group
Campbell Soup Co.
H.J. Heinz Company
Nestlé
Hershey
Kellogg
ConAgra Foods
General Mills
Hormel Foods Corporation
Dean Foods
Golden Agri-Resources
Associated British Foods
Bunge
Grupo Bimbo
Unilever
Kraft Foods
Tyson Foods
Archer Daniels Midland
J. M. Smuckers
Wilmar International
Hillshire Brands.
Olam International
Saputo
Corn Products Inc.
McCormick & Co
BRF-Brasil Foods
JB S
Kerry Group
Country
Japan
United States
France
United States
United States
Switzerland
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
Singapore
United Kingdom
Bermuda
Mexico
Netherlands
United States
United States
United States
United States
Singapore
United States
Singapore
Canada
United States
United States
Brazil
Brazi l
Ireland
8.75
JBS
Kerry Group
Grade
50.42
8.75
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
8.75
20
40
60
80
13
100
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Performance Rankings
31.25
Ajinomoto
28.13
Smith�ield Foods
25.00
Danone Group
21.88
Golden Agri-Resources
21.88
Hormel Foods Corporation
18.75
Grupo Bimbo
H.J. Heinz Company
18.75
Unilever
18.75
18.75
Kraft Foods
15.63
Dean Foods
15.63
Hershey
15.63
Kellogg
Nestlé
15.63
12.50
Bunge
12.50
General Mills
Hillshire Brands.
9.38
J. M. Smuckers
9.38
9.38
Saputo
6.25
Archer Daniels Midland
6.25
ConAgra Foods
6.25
Tyson Foods
3.13
BRF-Brasil Foods
JBS
3.13
McCormick & Co
Company Name
Ajinomoto
Campbell Soup Co.
Associated British Foods
Smithfield Foods
Danone Group
Golden Agri-Resources
Hormel Foods Corporation
Grupo Bimbo
H.J. Heinz Company
Kraft Foods
Unilever
Dean Foods
Hershey
Kellogg
Nestlé
Bunge
General Mills
Hillshire Brands.
J. M. Smuckers
Saputo
Archer Daniels Midland
ConAgra Foods
Tyson Foods
BRF-Brasil Foods
JBS
McCormick & Co
Olam International
Wilmar International
Corn Products Inc.
Kerry Group
Country
Japan
United States
United Kingdom
United States
France
Singapore
United States
Mexico
United States
United States
Netherlands
United States
United States
United States
Switzerland
Bermuda
United States
United States
United States
Canada
United States
United States
United States
Brazil
Brazi l
United States
Singapore
Singapore
United States
Ireland
3.13
Olam International
3.13
Wilmar International
3.13
Corn Products Inc.
www.roberts.cmc.edu
A+
A+
A
A
AB
B
BBBBC+
C+
C+
C+
C
C
CCCD
D
D
DDDDDF
F
28.13
Associated British Foods
Kerry Group
Grade
31.25
Campbell Soup Co.
0
0.00
0.00
20
40
60
80
14
100
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Danone Group
Ajinomoto
Social Intent Rankings
73.08
Campbell Soup Co.
88.46 Grade
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
BBC+
C+
C+
C
C
C
C
CCCD+
D+
D+
D+
D
DF
F
73.08
ConAgra Foods
73.08
H.J. Heinz Company
73.08
Kellogg
73.08
Nestlé
73.08
Golden Agri-Resources
69.23
Smith�ield Foods
69.23
Unilever
69.23
General Mills
61.54
Wilmar International
61.54
Grupo Bimbo
53.85
Hershey
53.85
Hormel Foods
53.85
Kraft Foods
50.00
Olam International
50.00
Tyson Foods
50.00
Associated British
46.15
Archer Daniels
42.31
Kerry Group
42.31
Corn Products Inc.
38.46
McCormick & Co
34.62
Bunge
30.77
Dean Foods
30.77
Saputo
Company Name
Danone Group
Ajinomoto
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
H.J. Heinz Company
Kellogg
Nestlé
Golden Agri-Resources
Smithfield Foods
Unilever
General Mills
Wilmar International
Grupo Bimbo
Hershey
Hormel Foods Corporation
Kraft Foods
Olam International
Tyson Foods
Associated British Foods
Archer Daniels Midland
Kerry Group
Corn Products Inc.
McCormick & Co
Bunge
Dean Foods
Saputo
Hillshire Brands.
BRF-Brasil Foods
J. M. Smuckers
JBS
Country
France
Japan
United States
United States
United States
United States
Switzerland
Singapore
United States
Netherlands
United States
Singapore
Mexico
United States
United States
United States
Singapore
United States
United Kingdom
United States
Ireland
United States
United States
Bermuda
United States
Canada
United States
Brazil
United States
Brazil
30.77
Hillshire Brands.
26.92
BRF-Brasil Foods
J. M. Smuckers
0.00
JBS
0
0.00
www.roberts.cmc.edu
15.38
20
40
60
80
15
100
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Unilever
Danone Group
Social Reporting Rankings
70.50
68.45
Tyson Foods
68.07
Nestlé
65.50
Hormel Foods
58.84
Kraft Foods
57.30
Golden Agri-
53.71
Smith�ield Foods
53.33
Hershey
53.07
Kellogg
51.53
Campbell Soup Co.
49.74
Ajinomoto
48.71
H.J. Heinz
48.20
ConAgra Foods
43.58
Grupo Bimbo
41.28
Corn Products Inc.
38.33
Wilmar
37.17
Dean Foods
35.89
Archer Daniels
35.89
Bunge
35.38
Associated British
34.74
J. M. Smuckers
33.58
Kerry Group
31.41
Hillshire Brands.
28.07
BRF-Brasil Foods
A+
A
A
A
B+
B+
B
B
B
B
B
B
BBC+
C+
C
C
C
C
C
C
CCD+
D
D
DDF
Company Name
Unilever
Danone Group
Tyson Foods
Nestlé
Hormel Foods Corporation
Kraft Foods
Golden Agri-Resources
Smithfield Foods
Hershey
Kellogg
Campbell Soup Co.
Ajinomoto
H.J. Heinz Company
ConAgra Foods
Grupo Bimbo
Corn Products Inc.
Wilmar International
Dean Foods
Archer Daniels Midland
Bunge
Associated British Foods
J. M. Smuckers
Kerry Group
Hillshire Brands.
BRF-Brasil Foods
Olam International
General Mills
McCormick & Co
Saputo
JBS
Country
Netherlands
France
United States
Switzerland
United States
United States
Singapore
United States
United States
United States
United States
Japan
United States
United States
Mexico
United States
Singapore
United States
United States
Bermuda
United Kingdom
United States
Ireland
United States
Brazil
Singapore
United States
United States
Canada
Brazi l
22.43
Olam International
18.33
General Mills
16.66
McCormick & Co
16.15
Saputo
JBS
Grade
11.15
0
5.90
www.roberts.cmc.edu
20
40
60
80
16
100
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Social Performance Rankings
Unilever
48.08
Danone Group
A+
A
B+
B+
B+
B+
B
B
B
B
BBC+
C+
C+
C+
C+
C+
CD+
D+
D
D
D
D
DDDF
F
36.54
ConAgra Foods
34.62
Kellogg
34.62
Kraft Foods
34.62
Hormel Foods
32.69
Golden Agri-Resources
30.77
Nestlé
30.77
Smith�ield Foods
30.77
Campbell Soup Co.
26.92
H.J. Heinz Company
26.92
Grupo Bimbo
25.00
Hershey
25.00
Archer Daniels
23.08
Bunge
23.08
Corn Products Inc.
23.08
Kerry Group
23.08
Ajinomoto
17.31
Associated British
11.54
Wilmar International
11.54
BRF-Brasil Foods
9.62
Dean Foods
9.62
J. M. Smuckers
9.62
General Mills
7.69
McCormick & Co
Company Name
Unilever
Danone Group
Tyson Foods
ConAgra Foods
Kellogg
Kraft Foods
Hormel Foods Corporation
Golden Agri-Resources
Nestlé
Smithfield Foods
Campbell Soup Co.
H.J. Heinz Company
Grupo Bimbo
Hershey
Archer Daniels Midland
Bunge
Corn Products Inc.
Kerry Group
Ajinomoto
Associated British Foods
Wilmar International
BRF-Brasil Foods
Dean Foods
J. M. Smuckers
General Mills
McCormick & Co
Olam International
Saputo
Hillshire Brands.
JBS
Country
Netherlands
France
United States
United States
United States
United States
United States
Singapore
Switzerland
United States
United States
United States
Mexico
United States
United States
Bermuda
United States
Ireland
Japan
United Kingdom
Singapore
Brazil
United States
United States
United States
United States
Singapore
Canada
United States
Brazi l
3.85
Olam International
3.85
Saputo
3.85
Hillshire Brands.
JBS
Grade
44.23
Tyson Foods
1.92
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
0.00
20
40
60
80
17
100
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Human Rights Reporting Elements of the PSI Scores
Percent of Companies Reporting*
Human Rights Topics
Adoption
Reinforcement Monitoring
Compliance
Anti-corruption practices
66.67%
46.67%
16.67%
3.33%
Bribery
66.67%
50.00%
16.67%
0.00%
Degrading treatment or punishment of
employees
46.67%
16.67%
6.67%
3.33%
Effective abolition of child labor
70.00%
50.00%
30.00%
16.67%
Elimination of all forms of forced and
compulsory labor
70.00%
46.67%
23.33%
13.33%
Elimination of discrimination in respect to
employment and occupation
66.67%
36.67%
16.67%
10.00%
Fair compensation of employees
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
13.33%
Free association and collective bargaining of
employees
70.00%
53.33%
33.33%
30.00%
Political contributions
56.67%
40.00%
13.33%
3.33%
Reasonable working hours
40.00%
16.67%
10.00%
3.33%
Sexual harassment
66.67%
46.67%
20.00%
0.00%
Basis of Scores
Adoption
We assign one point for adoption of a policy standard or for an explicit discussion of an organization’s stance on
each of 11 human rights principles.
Reinforcement
We assign one point for a description of reinforcement actions to make a policy stronger, such as providing
educational programs, training, or other activities to promote awareness.
Monitoring
We assign one point for a description of monitoring measures including mechanisms to detect violations at an
early stage, providing systematic reporting, or establishment of committee structure to oversee risky activities.
Compliance
We assign one point for a quantitative indication of compliance, such as a description of incidences of failure of
compliance, or a statement that there were no such incidences.
www.roberts.cmc.edu
18
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Average Overall, Environmental, and Social PSI Scores Performance
by Country
This graph illustrates the
average PSI in three categories-overall, environmental, and
social--breakdown by countries.
Since our sample size follows the
world's largest companies from
the Forbes list, several countries
have only one company score to
represent the whole country's
sustainability reporting in the
sector.
United States
United Kingdom
Sw itzerland
Singapore
Netherlands
Mexico
Overall
Japan
Ireland
France
Canada
Brazil
Country
N
United States
16
United Kingdom
1
Singapore
Switzerland
Singapore
1
3
Netherlands
Netherlands
1
Mexico
Japan
1
1
Ireland
France
1
1
Canada
1
Brazil
Bermuda
2
1
Berm uda
United States
United Kingdom
Sw itzerland
Mexico
Environmental
Japan
Ireland
France
Canada
Brazil
Berm uda
United States
United Kingdom
Sw itzerland
Singapore
Netherlands
Mexico
Social
Japan
Ireland
France
Canada
Brazil
Berm uda
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
10
20
30
40
50
19
60
70
80
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Relationship Between Overall PSI Score and Financial Indicators
CompanyName
Overall Sales ($B)
Score
Log Sales
Profits
($B)
Log
Profits
Assets
($B)
Log
Assets
Market
Value
($B)
Log
Market
Value
Kraft Foods
42.35
54.40
1.74
3.50
0.54
93.80
1.97
67.90
1.83
Danone Group
60.94
25.00
1.40
2.20
0.34
39.40
1.60
44.80
1.65
Archer Daniels Midland
30.08
88.20
1.95
1.50
0.18
41.50
1.62
21.00
1.32
Wilmar International
31.69
43.20
1.64
1.50
0.18
39.40
1.60
25.10
1.40
General Mills
36.99
15.80
1.20
1.60
0.20
21.50
1.33
25.00
1.40
Bunge
30.70
58.70
1.77
0.90
-0.05
23.30
1.37
9.90
1.00
Associated British Foods
37.69
17.20
1.24
0.80
-0.10
15.70
1.20
14.90
1.17
Kellogg
47.85
13.20
1.12
1.20
0.08
11.90
1.08
18.80
1.27
H.J. Heinz Company
48.76
11.50
1.06
1.00
0.00
12.00
1.08
17.10
1.23
BRF-Brasil Foods
12.34
13.70
1.14
0.50
-0.30
15.40
1.19
18.20
1.26
5.90
33.10
1.52
0.00
0.00
25.40
1.40
13.70
1.14
ConAgra Foods
45.87
12.80
1.11
0.70
-0.15
11.50
1.06
10.90
1.04
Tyson Foods
38.82
33.00
1.52
0.60
-0.22
11.20
1.05
7.30
0.86
Ajinomoto
50.16
14.50
1.16
0.40
-0.40
12.90
1.11
8.00
0.90
Golden Agri-Resources
46.51
5.80
0.76
1.20
0.08
11.80
1.07
7.20
0.86
Hillshire Brands.
15.09
9.00
0.95
0.50
-0.30
8.20
0.91
12.70
1.10
Campbell Soup Co.
50.82
7.70
0.89
0.80
-0.10
6.70
0.83
10.40
1.02
Grupo Bimbo
36.27
9.60
0.98
0.40
-0.40
9.50
0.98
10.90
1.04
Hershey
44.27
6.10
0.79
0.60
-0.22
4.40
0.64
13.60
1.13
Hormel Foods Corporation
41.12
8.00
0.90
0.50
-0.30
4.30
0.63
7.60
0.88
J. M. Smuckers
19.59
5.40
0.73
0.50
-0.30
9.20
0.96
8.70
0.94
Smithfield Foods
50.26
13.00
1.11
0.40
-0.40
7.10
0.85
3.70
0.57
Corn Products Inc.
25.38
6.20
0.79
0.40
-0.40
5.30
0.72
4.30
0.63
Saputo
15.06
6.60
0.82
0.50
-0.30
3.70
0.57
8.60
0.93
Dean Foods
31.30
13.10
1.12
0.00
0.00
5.80
0.76
2.20
0.34
McCormick & Co
14.23
3.70
0.57
0.40
-0.40
4.10
0.61
6.90
0.84
Kerry Group
24.45
6.90
0.84
0.50
-0.30
6.80
0.83
8.00
0.90
Olam International
22.75
12.90
1.11
0.40
-0.40
10.20
1.01
4.60
0.66
Nestlé
48.27
89.20
1.95
10.10
1.00
119.40
2.08
205.40
2.31
Unilever
50.28
60.20
1.78
5.50
0.74
61.50
1.79
102.40
2.01
JBS
www.roberts.cmc.edu
20
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Log MarketValue
70
#Name?
60
Overall PSI Scores
50
2
R = 0.0463
40
30
20
10
0
0
0.5
1
1. 5
2
Log Sales ($B)
2.5
70
60
Overall PSI Scores
50
2
R = 0.0767
40
30
20
10
0
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
0.5
1
1. 5
Log Assets ($B)
21
2
2.5
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
70
60
2
R = 0.1794
Overall PSI Scores
50
40
30
20
10
0
- 0.6
- 0.4
- 0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0 .6
0.8
1
1. 2
Log Profits ($B)
70
60
Overall PSI Scores
50
2
R = 0.1055
40
30
20
10
0
0
0.5
1
1. 5
2
2.5
Log Market Value ($B)
www.roberts.cmc.edu
22
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Number of Explicit Numerical Goals Reported
Ajinomoto
Archer Daniels Midland
Associated British Foods
Bunge
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Danone Group
Dean Foods
General Mills
Golden Agri-Resources
Grupo Bimbo
H.J. Heinz Company
Hershey
Hormel Foods Corporation
J. M. Smuckers
Kellogg
Kerry Group
Kraft Foods
McCormick & Co
Nestlé
Smithfield Foods
Tyson Foods
Unilever
Wilmar International
6
6
1
5
6
5
3
5
5
1
4
6
4
6
4
4
1
7
2
7
10
3
7
2
0
5
10
15
Topics reported:
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
Companies reporting:
Energy used (total)
Archer Daniels Midland
Campbell Soup Co.
Danone Group
Dean Foods
General Mills
Grupo Bimbo
H.J. Heinz Company
Hormel Foods Corporation
Kellogg
Kraft Foods
McCormick & Co
Nestlé
www.roberts.cmc.edu
23
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported:
Companies reporting:
Energy used (total)
Smithfield Foods
Food Waste
Danone Group
Nestlé
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
Ajinomoto
Bunge
ConAgra Foods
Danone Group
Dean Foods
General Mills
Grupo Bimbo
H.J. Heinz Company
Hershey
Hormel Foods Corporation
J. M. Smuckers
Kellogg
Kerry Group
Kraft Foods
Nestlé
Smithfield Foods
Tyson Foods
Unilever
Wilmar International
Indigenous people
Tyson Foods
Lost workday case rate
Ajinomoto
Archer Daniels Midland
Bunge
Campbell Soup Co.
Kraft Foods
Smithfield Foods
Notices of violation (environmental)
Smithfield Foods
Recordable incident/accident rate
Ajinomoto
www.roberts.cmc.edu
24
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported:
Companies reporting:
Recordable incident/accident rate
Archer Daniels Midland
Bunge
Campbell Soup Co.
Grupo Bimbo
H.J. Heinz Company
J. M. Smuckers
Kraft Foods
Nestlé
Smithfield Foods
Unilever
Reforestation
ConAgra Foods
General Mills
Kraft Foods
Nestlé
Wilmar International
Renewable energy used
Campbell Soup Co.
H.J. Heinz Company
Unilever
Social community investment
Hormel Foods Corporation
Smithfield Foods
Waste (hazardous) produced
Smithfield Foods
Unilever
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
Smithfield Foods
Waste (office) recycled
Unilever
Waste (solid) disposed of
Ajinomoto
Archer Daniels Midland
Associated British Foods
Bunge
ConAgra Foods
Dean Foods
www.roberts.cmc.edu
25
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported:
Companies reporting:
Waste (solid) disposed of
General Mills
Golden Agri-Resources
H.J. Heinz Company
Hershey
Hormel Foods Corporation
J. M. Smuckers
Kellogg
Kraft Foods
McCormick & Co
Nestlé
Smithfield Foods
Unilever
Waste recycled: solid waste
Ajinomoto
Archer Daniels Midland
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Dean Foods
Hershey
Hormel Foods Corporation
Water used
Ajinomoto
Archer Daniels Midland
Bunge
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Dean Foods
General Mills
Grupo Bimbo
H.J. Heinz Company
Hershey
Hormel Foods Corporation
J. M. Smuckers
Kellogg
Kraft Foods
Nestlé
Smithfield Foods
www.roberts.cmc.edu
26
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported:
Companies reporting:
Water used
Tyson Foods
Unilever
www.roberts.cmc.edu
27
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Number of Topics Showing Performance Improvement Over
Previous Year Data
Ajinomoto
Archer Daniels Midland
Associated British Foods
BRF-Brasil Foods
Bunge
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Corn Products Inc.
Danone Group
Dean Foods
General Mills
Golden Agri-Resources
Grupo Bimbo
H.J. Heinz Company
Hershey
Hillshire Brands.
Hormel Foods Corporation
J. M. Smuckers
JBS
Kellogg
Kraft Foods
McCormick & Co
Nestlé
Olam International
Saputo
Smithfield Foods
Tyson Foods
Unilever
Wilmar International
9
6
9
3
6
16
10
3
11
7
5
8
6
10
8
4
8
5
1
11
9
1
9
1
4
12
5
13
5
0
5
10
15
20
Topics reported:
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
Companies reporting:
Access to health care for employees
Unilever
Community development
Archer Daniels Midland
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
General Mills
Kellogg
Kraft Foods
Olam International
Smithfield Foods
Unilever
www.roberts.cmc.edu
28
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported:
Companies reporting:
Community education
Campbell Soup Co.
Nestlé
Tyson Foods
Unilever
Wilmar International
Employee satisfaction surveys
Associated British Foods
Danone Group
Kellogg
Smithfield Foods
Unilever
Employee turnover rate
ConAgra Foods
Danone Group
Golden Agri-Resources
Tyson Foods
Employee volunteerism
BRF-Brasil Foods
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Kraft Foods
Smithfield Foods
Energy used (total)
Ajinomoto
Archer Daniels Midland
Associated British Foods
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Danone Group
General Mills
Grupo Bimbo
H.J. Heinz Company
Hillshire Brands.
J. M. Smuckers
Kellogg
Kraft Foods
Saputo
www.roberts.cmc.edu
29
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported:
Companies reporting:
Energy used (total)
Smithfield Foods
Unilever
Environmental expenses and investments
Ajinomoto
Campbell Soup Co.
Danone Group
Fines (environmental)
Associated British Foods
Golden Agri-Resources
H.J. Heinz Company
Hershey
Food Waste
Kellogg
Green food purchasing
Associated British Foods
Campbell Soup Co.
Kraft Foods
Green transportation initiatives
Ajinomoto
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
Associated British Foods
Bunge
Campbell Soup Co.
Danone Group
Dean Foods
General Mills
Golden Agri-Resources
Hershey
Hormel Foods Corporation
J. M. Smuckers
Kellogg
Kraft Foods
Nestlé
Smithfield Foods
Unilever
Health and safety citations
Ajinomoto
Lost workday case rate
www.roberts.cmc.edu
30
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported:
Companies reporting:
Lost workday case rate
Archer Daniels Midland
ConAgra Foods
Corn Products Inc.
Danone Group
Dean Foods
Hershey
J. M. Smuckers
Kellogg
Kraft Foods
Nestlé
Saputo
Smithfield Foods
Wilmar International
Notices of violation (environmental)
Associated British Foods
Golden Agri-Resources
Grupo Bimbo
H.J. Heinz Company
Hershey
Hormel Foods Corporation
Occupational health and safety protection
Ajinomoto
Archer Daniels Midland
BRF-Brasil Foods
Bunge
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Corn Products Inc.
Danone Group
Dean Foods
Golden Agri-Resources
Grupo Bimbo
H.J. Heinz Company
Hershey
Hormel Foods Corporation
Kellogg
Kraft Foods
www.roberts.cmc.edu
31
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported:
Companies reporting:
Occupational health and safety protection
Nestlé
Smithfield Foods
Unilever
Wilmar International
Recordable incident/accident rate
Archer Daniels Midland
Associated British Foods
BRF-Brasil Foods
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Corn Products Inc.
Danone Group
Dean Foods
H.J. Heinz Company
Hershey
Hillshire Brands.
Hormel Foods Corporation
J. M. Smuckers
Kellogg
Nestlé
Saputo
Smithfield Foods
Tyson Foods
Unilever
Renewable energy used
Associated British Foods
H.J. Heinz Company
Unilever
Social community investment
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Hormel Foods Corporation
Kellogg
Smithfield Foods
Sustainable agriculture
Ajinomoto
Archer Daniels Midland
www.roberts.cmc.edu
32
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported:
Companies reporting:
Sustainable agriculture
Bunge
Campbell Soup Co.
Golden Agri-Resources
H.J. Heinz Company
Nestlé
Unilever
Waste (hazardous) produced
Bunge
Waste (hazardous) released to the
environment
Smithfield Foods
Waste (office) recycled
Campbell Soup Co.
Smithfield Foods
Waste (solid) disposed of
Ajinomoto
Associated British Foods
Bunge
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Danone Group
Dean Foods
General Mills
Grupo Bimbo
H.J. Heinz Company
Hershey
Hillshire Brands.
Hormel Foods Corporation
Kellogg
Kraft Foods
Nestlé
Tyson Foods
Unilever
Waste recycled: solid waste
Ajinomoto
Campbell Soup Co.
Danone Group
www.roberts.cmc.edu
33
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported:
Companies reporting:
Waste recycled: solid waste
Dean Foods
Golden Agri-Resources
Grupo Bimbo
Hormel Foods Corporation
Water used
Ajinomoto
Bunge
Campbell Soup Co.
Dean Foods
General Mills
Golden Agri-Resources
Grupo Bimbo
H.J. Heinz Company
Hershey
Hillshire Brands.
Hormel Foods Corporation
J. M. Smuckers
JBS
Kellogg
Kraft Foods
McCormick & Co
Nestlé
Saputo
Smithfield Foods
Tyson Foods
Unilever
Wilmar International
Women in management
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Danone Group
H.J. Heinz Company
Nestlé
Unilever
Wilmar International
www.roberts.cmc.edu
34
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Number of Topics in which Performance was
Better than Sector Average*
Ajinomoto
4
Archer Daniels Midland 1
Associated British Foods 2
BRF-Brasil Foods 1
Campbell Soup Co. 3
ConAgra Foods 1
Corn Products Inc. 1
Danone Group 2
Golden Agri-Resources 2
Grupo Bimbo 1
H.J. Heinz Company 1
Hormel Foods Corporation 2
Kellogg 1
Kerry Group 1
Kraft Foods 1
Nestlé 2
Olam International 1
Saputo 1
Smithfield Foods
5
Tyson Foods 1
Unilever 1
0
5
10
15
Topics reported:
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
Companies reporting:
Energy used (total)
Campbell Soup Co.
Hormel Foods Corporation
Environmental expenses and investments
Ajinomoto
Associated British Foods
Campbell Soup Co.
Danone Group
Nestlé
Olam International
Saputo
Smithfield Foods
www.roberts.cmc.edu
35
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported:
Companies reporting:
Reforestation
Grupo Bimbo
Smithfield Foods
Renewable energy used
Ajinomoto
Associated British Foods
BRF-Brasil Foods
Danone Group
Golden Agri-Resources
Nestlé
Smithfield Foods
Unilever
Social community investment
Ajinomoto
Archer Daniels Midland
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Corn Products Inc.
Golden Agri-Resources
H.J. Heinz Company
Hormel Foods Corporation
Kellogg
Kerry Group
Kraft Foods
Smithfield Foods
Tyson Foods
Waste (office) recycled
Ajinomoto
Smithfield Foods
www.roberts.cmc.edu
36
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Ajinomoto
B+
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
B+
A++
B-
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
S
46%
ESA
78
25
50
75
73
57
E
54%
E
0
Distribution of points
49
31
17
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
A jinomoto
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
100
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
100
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
0
37
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
50
Workforce profile: gender
50
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
100
Third-party validation
100
Employment for individuals with disabilities
100
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
29
Green food purchasing
20
Green transportation initiatives
100
Reforestation
14
Energy used (total)
71
Renewable energy used
57
Water used
86
Waste recycled: solid waste
86
Waste (office) recycled
43
Waste (solid) disposed of
86
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
43
Environmental expenses and investments
86
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
71
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
38
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
40
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
60
Anti-corruption practices
0
Bribery
0
Political contributions
0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
14
Fair compensation of employees
0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
50
Reasonable working hours
14
Effective abolition of child labor
50
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
60
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
71
Lost workday case rate
71
Health and safety citations
29
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
43
Employee turnover rate
29
Women in management
60
Sexual harassment
50
www.roberts.cmc.edu
39
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Archer Daniels Midland
C
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
C
C
C
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
E
45%
ESA
S
55%
E
0
25
50
75
Distribution of points
56
42
20
36
23
6
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
A rc her Daniels
Midland
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
0
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
0
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
100
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
100
Social policy statement
0
Code of conduct or business ethics
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
40
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
100
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
50
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
50
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
50
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
0
Report contact person
100
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
80
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
43
Renewable energy used
14
Water used
43
Waste recycled: solid waste
29
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
29
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
0
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
www.roberts.cmc.edu
41
14
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Social and Human Rights Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
100
Anti-corruption practices
0
Bribery
0
Political contributions
50
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
0
Fair compensation of employees
0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
Reasonable working hours
14
0
Effective abolition of child labor
14
Community development
60
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
100
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
71
Lost workday case rate
71
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
43
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
20
Sexual harassment
0
Access to health care for employees
www.roberts.cmc.edu
80
42
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Associated British Foods
B-
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
BAC-
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
S
72
40%
ESA
46
38
35
28
12
E
E
0
25
50
75
60%
10 0
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
A s s oc iated
Britis h Foods
SP
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
100
Zero Waste Policy
50
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
0
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
0
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
50
Social impediments and challenges
100
Social policy statement
0
Code of conduct or business ethics
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
43
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
50
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
50
Emergency preparedness program
50
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
50
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
100
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
60
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
57
Renewable energy used
86
Water used
29
Waste recycled: solid waste
14
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
71
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
57
Environmental expenses and investments
43
Fines (environmental)
71
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
71
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
44
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
40
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
40
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
50
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
0
Fair compensation of employees
0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
0
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
0
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
60
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
80
Employee volunteerism
0
Recordable incident/accident rate
71
Lost workday case rate
29
Health and safety citations
14
Health and safety fines
43
Social community investment
14
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
0
Sexual harassment
www.roberts.cmc.edu
14
45
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
BRF-Brasil Foods
D-
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
DDD-
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
E
37%
ESA
22
16
15
BRF-Bras il
Foods
10
9
3
E
0
25
50
75
10 0
S
63%
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
SP
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
50
Environmental impediments and challenges
0
Environmental policy statement
50
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
0
Biodiversity
0
Green purchasing
0
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
0
Environmental management system
50
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
0
Social visionary statement
0
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
0
Code of conduct or business ethics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
100
46
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
0
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
0
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
0
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
14
Renewable energy used
57
Water used
0
Waste recycled: solid waste
14
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
0
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
0
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
29
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
47
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
80
Anti-corruption practices
0
Bribery
0
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
0
Fair compensation of employees
0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
0
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
0
Community development
80
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
0
Occupational health and safety protection
60
Employee volunteerism
60
Recordable incident/accident rate
29
Lost workday case rate
29
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
29
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
0
Sexual harassment
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
48
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Bunge
C
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
C
BC-
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
50
S
ESA
31
48%
23
13
Bunge
EI
25
50
75
35
52%
E
0
35
E
SI
ER
SR
EP
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
0
Environmental management system
50
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
50
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
0
Code of conduct or business ethics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
100
49
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
0
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
50
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
50
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
14
Energy used (total)
57
Renewable energy used
14
Water used
71
Waste recycled: solid waste
14
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
86
Waste (hazardous) produced
71
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
0
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
86
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
50
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
100
Anti-corruption practices
0
Bribery
0
Political contributions
0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
14
Fair compensation of employees
14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
14
Reasonable working hours
14
Effective abolition of child labor
14
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
100
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
29
Lost workday case rate
57
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
0
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
0
Sexual harassment
www.roberts.cmc.edu
14
51
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Campbell Soup Co.
A-
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
AA+
B
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
78
S
48%
ESA
E
52%
E
0
25
50
75
Distribution of points
73
50
50
31
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
27
Campbell Soup
Co.
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
100
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
50
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
50
Environmental accounting
100
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
100
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
52
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
100
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
100
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
100
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
29
Green food purchasing
60
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
100
Renewable energy used
29
Water used
86
Waste recycled: solid waste
86
Waste (office) recycled
29
Waste (solid) disposed of
71
Waste (hazardous) produced
29
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
29
Environmental expenses and investments
71
Fines (environmental)
29
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
71
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
53
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
60
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
14
Fair compensation of employees
14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
14
Reasonable working hours
14
Effective abolition of child labor
14
Community development
100
Employee satisfaction surveys
20
Community education
60
Occupational health and safety protection
100
Employee volunteerism
100
Recordable incident/accident rate
86
Lost workday case rate
71
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
71
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
60
Sexual harassment
14
www.roberts.cmc.edu
54
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
ConAgra Foods
B+
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
B+
B+
B
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
ESA
Source of points
E
46%
S
54%
E
0
25
50
75
Distribution of points
78
73
44
44
35
ConA gra Foods
6
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
100
Zero Waste Policy
100
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
0
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
50
Environmental accounting
50
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
100
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
55
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
50
Workforce profile: gender
100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
100
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
50
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
100
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
29
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
29
Energy used (total)
71
Renewable energy used
0
Water used
71
Waste recycled: solid waste
43
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
86
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
43
Environmental expenses and investments
14
Fines (environmental)
29
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
71
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
56
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
80
Anti-corruption practices
0
Bribery
0
Political contributions
0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
64
Fair compensation of employees
14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
14
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
64
Community development
100
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
100
Employee volunteerism
60
Recordable incident/accident rate
57
Lost workday case rate
57
Health and safety citations
29
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
71
Employee turnover rate
71
Women in management
100
Sexual harassment
www.roberts.cmc.edu
0
57
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Corn Products Inc.
C-
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
CD+
C
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
E
36%
ESA
44
38
38
23
11
0
E
0
25
50
75
10 0
S
64%
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
Corn Produc ts
Inc .
SP
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
0
Environmental policy statement
50
Climate change/global warming
0
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
0
Biodiversity
0
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
100
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
50
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
50
Code of conduct or business ethics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
100
58
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
50
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
100
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
100
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
0
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
29
Renewable energy used
0
Water used
29
Waste recycled: solid waste
29
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
14
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
0
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
29
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
59
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
40
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
14
Fair compensation of employees
14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
14
Reasonable working hours
14
Effective abolition of child labor
14
Community development
80
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
60
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
57
Lost workday case rate
57
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
57
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
0
Sexual harassment
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
60
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Danone Group
A+
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
A+
A++
A
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
ESA
Source of points
E
46%
S
54%
E
0
25
50
75
Distribution of points
94
88
68
51
44
25
Danone Group
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
100
Zero Waste Policy
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
100
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
100
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
61
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
0
Workforce profile: age
100
Workforce profile: gender
100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
100
Emergency preparedness program
50
Third-party validation
100
Employment for individuals with disabilities
100
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
50
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
29
Green food purchasing
80
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
14
Energy used (total)
86
Renewable energy used
57
Water used
57
Waste recycled: solid waste
71
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
71
Waste (hazardous) produced
14
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
29
Environmental expenses and investments
71
Fines (environmental)
29
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
86
www.roberts.cmc.edu
62
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Social and Human Rights Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Indigenous people
14
Sustainable agriculture
80
Anti-corruption practices
64
Bribery
0
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
64
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
64
Fair compensation of employees
64
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
64
Reasonable working hours
64
Effective abolition of child labor
64
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
100
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
100
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
71
Lost workday case rate
71
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
14
Employee turnover rate
71
Women in management
100
Sexual harassment
14
Access to health care for employees
80
www.roberts.cmc.edu
63
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Dean Foods
C
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
C
B
D+
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
S
59
40%
ESA
31
40
36
16
Dean Foods
10
E
E
0
25
50
75
60%
10 0
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
SP
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
100
Zero Waste Policy
100
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
50
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
0
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
50
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
50
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
50
Social visionary statement
0
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
0
Code of conduct or business ethics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
100
64
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
0
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
50
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
100
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
14
Green food purchasing
80
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
43
Renewable energy used
29
Water used
71
Waste recycled: solid waste
43
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
57
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
43
Environmental expenses and investments
29
Fines (environmental)
43
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
71
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
65
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
40
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
0
Fair compensation of employees
0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
0
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
0
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
40
Community education
0
Occupational health and safety protection
100
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
57
Lost workday case rate
57
Health and safety citations
14
Health and safety fines
43
Social community investment
0
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
40
Sexual harassment
14
www.roberts.cmc.edu
66
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
General Mills
B-
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
BAC-
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
S
81
38%
ESA
62
44
E
E
0
25
50
75
62%
10 0
EI
SI
ER
17
13
SR
EP
8
General Mills
SP
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
100
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
50
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
100
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
100
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
67
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
0
Workforce profile: age
50
Workforce profile: gender
50
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
50
Third-party validation
50
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
50
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
29
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
43
Energy used (total)
86
Renewable energy used
29
Water used
86
Waste recycled: solid waste
29
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
86
Waste (hazardous) produced
29
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
14
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
86
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
68
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
0
Anti-corruption practices
0
Bribery
0
Political contributions
0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
0
Fair compensation of employees
0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
0
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
0
Community development
100
Employee satisfaction surveys
40
Community education
80
Occupational health and safety protection
40
Employee volunteerism
80
Recordable incident/accident rate
0
Lost workday case rate
0
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
0
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
0
Sexual harassment
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
69
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Golden Agri-Resources
B+
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
B+
B+
B
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
ESA
Source of points
E
46%
S
54%
E
0
25
50
75
Distribution of points
69
69
54
39
22
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
31
Golden A griRes ourc es
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
50
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
0
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
0
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
100
Social policy statement
0
Code of conduct or business ethics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
100
70
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
50
Emergency preparedness program
100
Third-party validation
50
Employment for individuals with disabilities
50
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
100
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
14
Green food purchasing
80
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
43
Energy used (total)
14
Renewable energy used
43
Water used
57
Waste recycled: solid waste
57
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
57
Waste (hazardous) produced
14
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
57
Environmental expenses and investments
0
Fines (environmental)
57
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
43
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
71
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
80
Indigenous people
14
Sustainable agriculture
60
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
64
Fair compensation of employees
64
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
14
Reasonable working hours
14
Effective abolition of child labor
50
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
80
Occupational health and safety protection
100
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
29
Lost workday case rate
29
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
57
Employee turnover rate
29
Women in management
60
Sexual harassment
50
www.roberts.cmc.edu
72
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Grupo Bimbo
C+
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
C+
BC+
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
ESA
Source of points
E
46%
S
54%
E
0
25
50
75
Distribution of points
50
54
32
EI
SI
ER
41
19
SR
EP
25
Grupo Bimbo
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
0
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
0
Biodiversity
50
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
73
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
50
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
57
Energy used (total)
86
Renewable energy used
29
Water used
57
Waste recycled: solid waste
71
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
43
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
14
Environmental expenses and investments
0
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
43
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
74
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
0
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
64
Fair compensation of employees
64
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
0
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
14
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
100
Employee volunteerism
80
Recordable incident/accident rate
57
Lost workday case rate
43
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
29
Employee turnover rate
43
Women in management
0
Sexual harassment
www.roberts.cmc.edu
14
75
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
H.J. Heinz Company
B+
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
B+
A
B
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
81
S
50%
ESA
E
49
25
50
75
48
19
EI
0
73
E
50%
SI
ER
SR
EP
H.J. Heinz
Company
27
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
100
Zero Waste Policy
100
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
0
Biodiversity
0
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
100
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
76
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
100
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
50
Emergency preparedness program
100
Third-party validation
100
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
100
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
29
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
86
Renewable energy used
71
Water used
86
Waste recycled: solid waste
29
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
71
Waste (hazardous) produced
14
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
57
Environmental expenses and investments
29
Fines (environmental)
57
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
71
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
77
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
80
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
60
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
64
Fair compensation of employees
0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
14
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
0
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
40
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
100
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
86
Lost workday case rate
43
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
57
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
100
Sexual harassment
www.roberts.cmc.edu
14
78
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Hershey
B
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
B
AB-
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
78
S
E
49%
51%
ESA
E
54
16
EI
0
25
50
75
53
45
SI
ER
SR
EP
25
Hers hey
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
100
Zero Waste Policy
100
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
50
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
50
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
79
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
100
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
50
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
40
Reforestation
29
Energy used (total)
14
Renewable energy used
29
Water used
57
Waste recycled: solid waste
43
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
71
Waste (hazardous) produced
29
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
57
Environmental expenses and investments
14
Fines (environmental)
57
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
86
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
80
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
40
Indigenous people
14
Sustainable agriculture
40
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
14
Fair compensation of employees
14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
50
Reasonable working hours
14
Effective abolition of child labor
50
Community development
80
Employee satisfaction surveys
40
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
60
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
57
Lost workday case rate
57
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
14
Employee turnover rate
14
Women in management
80
Sexual harassment
14
www.roberts.cmc.edu
81
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Hillshire Brands.
D
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
D
DD
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
E
38%
ESA
27
28
15
9
9
2
E
0
25
50
75
10 0
S
62%
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
Hills hire Brands .
SP
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
50
Environmental impediments and challenges
0
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
0
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
0
Biodiversity
0
Green purchasing
0
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
0
Environmental management system
0
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
0
Social visionary statement
50
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
82
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
0
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
0
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
0
Green transportation initiatives
40
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
29
Renewable energy used
0
Water used
43
Waste recycled: solid waste
43
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
43
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
14
Environmental expenses and investments
0
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
0
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
83
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
0
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
14
Fair compensation of employees
14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
14
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
0
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
0
Occupational health and safety protection
40
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
57
Lost workday case rate
0
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
14
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
0
Sexual harassment
www.roberts.cmc.edu
14
84
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Hormel Foods Corporation
B-
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
BBB-
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
E
42%
ESA
S
58%
E
0
25
50
75
Distribution of points
41
54
59
41
22
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
33
Hormel Foods
Corporation
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
0
Environmental policy statement
50
Climate change/global warming
50
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
50
Biodiversity
0
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
50
Environmental management structure
0
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
50
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
50
Code of conduct or business ethics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
100
85
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
100
Emergency preparedness program
100
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
80
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
86
Renewable energy used
14
Water used
86
Waste recycled: solid waste
71
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
86
Waste (hazardous) produced
14
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
57
Environmental expenses and investments
0
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
71
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
86
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
40
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
0
Anti-corruption practices
50
Bribery
50
Political contributions
64
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
64
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
64
Fair compensation of employees
14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
14
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
14
Community development
80
Employee satisfaction surveys
80
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
Employee volunteerism
100
0
Recordable incident/accident rate
71
Lost workday case rate
57
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
86
Employee turnover rate
29
Women in management
40
Sexual harassment
50
www.roberts.cmc.edu
87
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
J. M. Smuckers
D+
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
D+
C
D-
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
S
36%
ESA
50
34
18
9
10
0
E
64%
E
0
25
50
75
10 0
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
J. M. Smuc kers
SP
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
0
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
50
Environmental accounting
50
Stakeholder consultation
50
Social visionary statement
0
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
0
Code of conduct or business ethics
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
88
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
0
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
0
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
0
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
57
Renewable energy used
14
Water used
43
Waste recycled: solid waste
14
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
29
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
0
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
43
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
89
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
40
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
50
Fair compensation of employees
14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
14
Reasonable working hours
14
Effective abolition of child labor
14
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
40
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
43
Lost workday case rate
43
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
14
Employee turnover rate
29
Women in management
0
Sexual harassment
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
90
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
JBS
F
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
F
DF
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
19
ESA
9
6
3
0
E
EI
0
25
50
75
10 0
SI
0
ER
SR
EP
JBS
SP
E
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
50
Climate change/global warming
0
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
0
Biodiversity
0
Green purchasing
0
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
0
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
0
Social visionary statement
0
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
0
Code of conduct or business ethics
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
91
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
0
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
0
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
0
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
0
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
14
Renewable energy used
14
Water used
29
Waste recycled: solid waste
0
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
14
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
14
Environmental expenses and investments
14
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
14
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
92
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
0
Anti-corruption practices
0
Bribery
0
Political contributions
0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
0
Fair compensation of employees
0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
0
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
0
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
0
Occupational health and safety protection
Employee volunteerism
40
0
Recordable incident/accident rate
14
Lost workday case rate
0
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
0
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
0
Sexual harassment
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
93
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Kellogg
B+
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
B+
AB
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
E
45%
ESA
S
55%
E
0
25
50
75
Distribution of points
72
73
52
45
35
16
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
Kellogg
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
100
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
50
Biodiversity
50
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
94
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
100
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
100
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
50
Employment for individuals with disabilities
100
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
43
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
40
Reforestation
29
Energy used (total)
86
Renewable energy used
14
Water used
86
Waste recycled: solid waste
29
Waste (office) recycled
14
Waste (solid) disposed of
86
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
14
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
86
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
95
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
80
Anti-corruption practices
0
Bribery
14
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
64
Fair compensation of employees
14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
14
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
14
Community development
100
Employee satisfaction surveys
100
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
100
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
71
Lost workday case rate
57
Health and safety citations
14
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
86
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
40
Sexual harassment
14
www.roberts.cmc.edu
96
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Kellogg
B+
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
B+
AB
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
E
45%
ESA
S
55%
E
0
25
50
75
Distribution of points
72
73
52
45
35
16
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
Kellogg
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
100
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
50
Biodiversity
50
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
97
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
100
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
100
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
50
Employment for individuals with disabilities
100
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
43
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
40
Reforestation
29
Energy used (total)
86
Renewable energy used
14
Water used
86
Waste recycled: solid waste
29
Waste (office) recycled
14
Waste (solid) disposed of
86
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
14
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
86
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
98
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
80
Anti-corruption practices
0
Bribery
14
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
64
Fair compensation of employees
14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
14
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
14
Community development
100
Employee satisfaction surveys
100
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
100
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
71
Lost workday case rate
57
Health and safety citations
14
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
86
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
40
Sexual harassment
14
www.roberts.cmc.edu
99
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Kerry Group
C-
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
CD+
C-
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
E
35%
ESA
44
42
31
23
9
Kerry Group
0
E
0
25
50
75
10 0
S
65%
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
SP
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
50
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
0
Biodiversity
0
Green purchasing
50
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
50
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
100
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
50
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
50
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
0
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
14
Renewable energy used
0
Water used
14
Waste recycled: solid waste
14
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
14
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
14
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
29
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
101
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
20
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
40
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
14
Fair compensation of employees
14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
14
Reasonable working hours
14
Effective abolition of child labor
14
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
20
Occupational health and safety protection
40
Employee volunteerism
0
Recordable incident/accident rate
0
Lost workday case rate
0
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
14
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
0
Sexual harassment
www.roberts.cmc.edu
14
102
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Kraft Foods
B
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
B
B
B-
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
E
45%
ESA
S
55%
E
0
25
50
75
Distribution of points
69
57
50
35
29
EI
SI
ER
19
SR
EP
Kraf t Foods
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
50
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
100
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
103
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
0
Workforce profile: age
50
Workforce profile: gender
100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
0
Report contact person
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
100
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
43
Energy used (total)
57
Renewable energy used
14
Water used
57
Waste recycled: solid waste
29
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
43
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
14
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
www.roberts.cmc.edu
104
57
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Social and Human Rights Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
80
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
14
Fair compensation of employees
14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
64
Reasonable working hours
14
Effective abolition of child labor
64
Community development
100
Employee satisfaction surveys
40
Community education
0
Occupational health and safety protection
60
Employee volunteerism
60
Recordable incident/accident rate
43
Lost workday case rate
71
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
71
Employee turnover rate
14
Women in management
80
Sexual harassment
14
Access to health care for employees
80
www.roberts.cmc.edu
105
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
McCormick & Co
D
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
D
DD
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
E
37%
ESA
35
19
10
E
0
25
50
75
10 0
S
63%
EI
SI
ER
16
SR
3
4
EP
SP
Mc Cormic k & Co
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
0
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
0
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
0
Biodiversity
0
Green purchasing
0
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
0
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
0
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
0
Code of conduct or business ethics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
100
106
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
0
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
50
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
0
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
29
Renewable energy used
0
Water used
29
Waste recycled: solid waste
29
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
29
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
0
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
14
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
107
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
40
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
0
Fair compensation of employees
0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
0
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
0
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
20
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
0
Lost workday case rate
0
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
14
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
0
Sexual harassment
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
108
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Nestlé
B+
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
B+
B+
B+
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
E
42%
ESA
S
58%
E
0
25
50
75
Distribution of points
63
73
66
46
31
16
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
Nes tlé
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
0
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
100
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
100
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
109
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
50
Workforce profile: gender
100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
50
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
100
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
43
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
40
Reforestation
29
Energy used (total)
57
Renewable energy used
57
Water used
86
Waste recycled: solid waste
14
Waste (office) recycled
14
Waste (solid) disposed of
71
Waste (hazardous) produced
14
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
43
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
71
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
110
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
40
Indigenous people
14
Sustainable agriculture
60
Anti-corruption practices
50
Bribery
50
Political contributions
0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
50
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
50
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
14
Fair compensation of employees
50
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
50
Reasonable working hours
50
Effective abolition of child labor
50
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
40
Community education
60
Occupational health and safety protection
60
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
71
Lost workday case rate
43
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
14
Employee turnover rate
43
Women in management
60
Sexual harassment
50
www.roberts.cmc.edu
111
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Olam International
C-
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
CCD+
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
50
ESA
E
48%
S
52%
E
0
25
50
75
50
14
EI
SI
ER
18
SR
Olam
International
3
4
EP
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
100
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
50
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
0
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
0
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
100
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
50
112
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
100
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
14
Energy used (total)
29
Renewable energy used
14
Water used
14
Waste recycled: solid waste
14
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
14
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
14
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
14
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
113
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
40
Indigenous people
14
Sustainable agriculture
80
Anti-corruption practices
0
Bribery
0
Political contributions
0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
0
Fair compensation of employees
0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
0
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
14
Community development
60
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
40
Employee volunteerism
0
Recordable incident/accident rate
0
Lost workday case rate
14
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
14
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
0
Sexual harassment
0
www.roberts.cmc.edu
114
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Saputo
D
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
D
D
D-
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
31
S
50%
ESA
E
E
50%
25
12
25
50
75
9
4
EI
0
11
SI
ER
SR
EP
Saputo
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
0
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
0
Biodiversity
0
Green purchasing
0
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
100
Environmental management system
0
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
0
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
50
Code of conduct or business ethics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
0
115
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
0
Workforce profile: age
50
Workforce profile: gender
0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
0
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
0
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
0
Green transportation initiatives
40
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
29
Renewable energy used
14
Water used
29
Waste recycled: solid waste
0
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
0
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
43
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
14
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
116
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
20
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
0
Anti-corruption practices
0
Bribery
0
Political contributions
0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
0
Fair compensation of employees
0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
0
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
0
Community development
40
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
0
Occupational health and safety protection
40
Employee volunteerism
20
Recordable incident/accident rate
29
Lost workday case rate
29
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
0
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
0
Sexual harassment
www.roberts.cmc.edu
14
117
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Smithfield Foods
B+
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
B+
A
B
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
S
E
50%
50%
ESA
E
0
25
50
75
Distribution of points
69
69
55
53
28
31
Smithf ield Foods
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
100
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
50
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
50
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
118
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
0
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
100
Emergency preparedness program
100
Third-party validation
50
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
0
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
14
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
43
Energy used (total)
71
Renewable energy used
29
Water used
71
Waste recycled: solid waste
14
Waste (office) recycled
71
Waste (solid) disposed of
29
Waste (hazardous) produced
43
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
86
Notices of violation (environmental)
57
Environmental expenses and investments
57
Fines (environmental)
43
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
86
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
119
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
0
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
60
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
14
Fair compensation of employees
14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
14
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
14
Community development
60
Employee satisfaction surveys
60
Community education
40
Occupational health and safety protection
100
Employee volunteerism
60
Recordable incident/accident rate
86
Lost workday case rate
86
Health and safety citations
43
Health and safety fines
43
Social community investment
71
Employee turnover rate
29
Women in management
20
Sexual harassment
14
www.roberts.cmc.edu
120
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Tyson Foods
B-
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
BC
B
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
E
34%
ESA
68
47
50
37
28
Ty s on Foods
6
E
0
25
50
75
10 0
S
66%
EI
SI
ER
SR
EP
SP
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
100
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
0
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
0
Biodiversity
0
Green purchasing
0
Environmental education
0
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
0
Code of conduct or business ethics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
100
121
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
50
Emergency preparedness program
100
Third-party validation
50
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
100
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
0
Energy used (total)
14
Renewable energy used
14
Water used
71
Waste recycled: solid waste
14
Waste (office) recycled
14
Waste (solid) disposed of
57
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
14
Fines (environmental)
43
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
57
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
122
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
40
Indigenous people
29
Sustainable agriculture
40
Anti-corruption practices
50
Bribery
50
Political contributions
50
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
50
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
64
Fair compensation of employees
64
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
64
Reasonable working hours
0
Effective abolition of child labor
64
Community development
80
Employee satisfaction surveys
0
Community education
60
Occupational health and safety protection
80
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
57
Lost workday case rate
43
Health and safety citations
29
Health and safety fines
29
Social community investment
57
Employee turnover rate
29
Women in management
20
Sexual harassment
50
www.roberts.cmc.edu
123
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Unilever
B+
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
B+
B
A-
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
E
39%
ESA
69
69
71
48
30
19
Unilev er
S
E
0
25
50
75
10 0
EI
61%
SI
ER
SR
EP
SP
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
50
Environmental visionary statement
100
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
0
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
100
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
100
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
100
Code of conduct or business ethics
100
www.roberts.cmc.edu
124
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
50
Workforce profile: gender
100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
100
Emergency preparedness program
0
Third-party validation
100
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
100
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
29
Energy used (total)
29
Renewable energy used
86
Water used
71
Waste recycled: solid waste
14
Waste (office) recycled
29
Waste (solid) disposed of
43
Waste (hazardous) produced
29
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
0
Notices of violation (environmental)
0
Environmental expenses and investments
0
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
57
Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
125
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics
Percent Coverage
Access to health care for employees
60
Indigenous people
0
Sustainable agriculture
100
Anti-corruption practices
50
Bribery
50
Political contributions
50
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
64
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
64
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
64
Fair compensation of employees
50
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
64
Reasonable working hours
50
Effective abolition of child labor
64
Community development
100
Employee satisfaction surveys
60
Community education
60
Occupational health and safety protection
100
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
71
Lost workday case rate
0
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
0
Employee turnover rate
14
Women in management
60
Sexual harassment
50
www.roberts.cmc.edu
126
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Wilmar International
C
Overall Grade:
Environmental Grade:
Social Grade:
C
C+
C
E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental
Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
Comparison with sector averages
Source of points
Distribution of points
E
ESA
S
E
57%
0
25
50
75
63
62
43%
37
18
EI
SI
ER
SR
W ilmar
International
3
12
EP
SP
10 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Genetically modified food
0
Locally grown organic food
0
Zero Waste Policy
0
Environmental impediments and challenges
100
Environmental policy statement
100
Climate change/global warming
100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation
100
Biodiversity
100
Green purchasing
0
Environmental education
100
Environmental management structure
50
Environmental management system
100
Environmental accounting
0
Stakeholder consultation
100
Social visionary statement
50
Social impediments and challenges
0
Social policy statement
50
Code of conduct or business ethics
www.roberts.cmc.edu
100
127
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Supplier screening based on social or environmental
performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure
50
Workforce profile: age
0
Workforce profile: gender
100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
50
Emergency preparedness program
100
Third-party validation
100
Employment for individuals with disabilities
0
Employee training for career development
100
Report contact person
100
Environmental visionary statement
50
Environmental Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Food Waste
0
Green food purchasing
40
Green transportation initiatives
0
Reforestation
29
Energy used (total)
0
Renewable energy used
14
Water used
57
Waste recycled: solid waste
14
Waste (office) recycled
0
Waste (solid) disposed of
0
Waste (hazardous) produced
0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
14
Notices of violation (environmental)
14
Environmental expenses and investments
0
Fines (environmental)
0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
www.roberts.cmc.edu
128
29
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Social and Human Rights Topics
Topics
Percent Coverage
Indigenous people
14
Sustainable agriculture
40
Anti-corruption practices
14
Bribery
14
Political contributions
0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and
occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
14
Fair compensation of employees
0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
Reasonable working hours
14
0
Effective abolition of child labor
14
Community development
80
Employee satisfaction surveys
20
Community education
100
Occupational health and safety protection
60
Employee volunteerism
40
Recordable incident/accident rate
14
Lost workday case rate
43
Health and safety citations
0
Health and safety fines
0
Social community investment
14
Employee turnover rate
0
Women in management
60
Sexual harassment
0
Access to health care for employees
www.roberts.cmc.edu
40
129
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
EI
1 Report contact person
4
-Discussion: identifies the person specifically
designated to answer questions about the report or
sustainability issues. Investor relations or public
relations contact representatives are not valid contacts
for this question.
-Initiatives/actions: to facilitate such contact, i.e.
providing email address, phone number, or a link for
feedback and questions.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
2 Environmental visionary statement
5
-Discussion: includes a clear visionary statement
expressing an organizational commitment to good
environmental performance.
-Initiatives/actions: include measures to fulfill that
commitment.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
3 Environmental impediments and challenges
6
-Discussion: of impediments and challenges faced by
the organization in attempting to realize its
environmental vision and commitments.
-Initiatives/actions: include measures to overcome
them.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
4 Environmental policy statement
9
-Discussion: includes a formal statement of the
organization's environmental policy or plan.
-Initiatives/actions: include a description of how the
policy is being implemented.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 1 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
130
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
5 Climate change/global warming
10
-Discussion: of the organization's position on climate
change and/or global warming.
-Initiatives/actions: include measures taken by the
organization to decrease its contribution to climate
change.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
6 Habitat/ecosystem conservation
11
-Discussion: of the organization's position on
conserving natural ecosystems and habitat.
-Initiatives/actions: taken to increase conservation of
natural ecosystems either associated with or separate
from the organization's business activities.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
7 Biodiversity
12
-Discussion: of the organization's position on
biodiversity.
-Initiatives/actions: taken by to the organization to
foster biodiversity.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
8 Green purchasing
13
-Discussion: about preferential purchasing of ecofriendly (non-polluting, recycled, recyclable, etc.)
products.
-Initiatives/actions: taken to implement such purchasing.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
9 Environmental education
16
-Discussion: of efforts to promote environmental
education and awareness of employees, the general
public, or children.
-Initiatives/actions: taken to provide such education.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
10 Environmental management structure
19
-Discussion: of the organization's environmental
management structure or staffing.
-Initiatives/actions: include identification of individuals
currently holding the staff positions.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 2 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
131
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
11 Environmental management system
20
-Discussion: includes a statement of adoption of ISO
14001 or other formal environmental management
system.
-Initiatives/actions: include information on the extent
to which the system has been implemented.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
12 Environmental accounting
21
-Discussion: of environmental expenditures.
-Initiatives/actions: include detailed accounting of such
expenditures.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
13 Stakeholder consultation
23
-Discussion: of consultation and dialogue with
stakeholders about the organization's environmental
aspects or impacts.
-Initiatives/actions: include identification of specific
consultation activities.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
14 Genetically modified food
207
Discussion of the company's position or policy on
genetically modified food
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
15 Zero Waste Policy
303
-Discussion: the city has adopted a formal Zero Waste
plan
-Initiatives/actions: the plan has resulted in a decrease
in the city's volume of waste going to landfills and
incinerators.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
16 Locally grown organic food
316
-Discussion: the company has implemented a program
to encourage the use of locally grown organic food
-Initiatives/actions: the company has a numerical goal
for the percentage of locally grown organic foods used
and a stated time frame for achieving it.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 3 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
132
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
SI
1 Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
17
-Discussion: of racial or ethnic distribution of
workforce.
-Initiatives/actions: taken to avoid racial or ethnic
discrimination.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
2 Workforce profile: gender
18
-Discussion: of gender distribution of workforce.
-Initiatives/actions: taken to avoid gender
discrimination and achieve appropriate balance
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
3 Social visionary statement
42
-Discussion: includes a clear visionary statement
expressing an organizational commitment to good
social performance.
-Initiatives/actions: include measures taken to fulfill
that commitment.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
4 Social impediments and challenges
43
Discussion: of impediments and challenges faced by the
organization in attempting to realize its social vision
and commitments.
Initiatives/actions: include measures taken to
overcome them.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
5 Social policy statement
45
-Discussion: includes a formal statement of the
company's social policy or plan.
-Initiatives/actions: include a description of how the
policy is being implemented.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 4 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
133
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
6 Code of conduct or business ethics
47
-Discussion: includes a formal organizational code of
conduct or of ethical behavior.
-Initiatives/actions: include measures to assure that the
code of conduct is followed.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
7 Supplier screening based on social or
environmental performance/ supplier management
49
-Discussion: or description of procedures to evaluate
and select suppliers on their ability to meet the
requirements of the company's social or
environmental policy and principles.
-Initiatives/actions: include measures to implement or
assure such screening or selection.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
8 Health and safety, or social organizational
structure
51
-Discussion: of organizational structure or staffing for
ensuring health and safety or social responsibility.
-Initiatives/actions: include identification of the
individuals currently holding the staff positions.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
9 Workforce profile: age
52
-Discussion: of age distribution of workforce.
-Initiatives/actions: include measures taken to avoid
age discrimination or to encourage a balanced age
structure.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
10 Emergency preparedness program
53
-Discussion: of emergency preparedness programs to
prepare employees or the public to cope with
potential emergencies at the organization's facilities.
-Initiatives/actions: include measures taken to
implement such programs.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 5 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
134
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
11 Third-party validation
54
-Discussion: of the value (or lack thereof) of thirdparty auditing or validation.
-Initiatives/actions: include formal auditing or validation
by a qualified external third-party source.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
12 Employment for individuals with disabilities
80
-Discussion: of appropriate actions to accommodate
employees with disabilities.
-Initiatives/actions: taken to implement such
accommodations.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
13 Employee training for career development
82
-Discussion: of training, skills and learning programs
appropriate to support employees' upward mobility.
-Initiatives/actions: taken to implement such training.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Links:
ER
1 Green transportation initiatives
163
Programs to encourage carpooling, mass transit or
other reductions in total commuting.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
2 Green food purchasing
166
Amount of food purchases come from local or organic
sources, sustainable farms, or sustainable fisheries.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
ER
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 6 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
135
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
1 Reforestation
186
Efforts to plant trees to restore a natural ecosystem of
a disturbed forest
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Improvement Over Previous
Units
Links:
2 Food Waste
228
Disposal of food material
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Units
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 7 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
136
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
3 Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total
83
The sum of all greenhouse gases released, which could
include CO2, CH4 (methane), N2O (nitrous oxide),
SF6 (Sulphur hexafluoride), PFCs (Perfluorocarbons)
and HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons).
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Improvement Over Previous
Units
Links:
4 Fines (environmental)
40
Government imposed fines for environmental
infractions.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Units
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 8 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
137
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
5 Environmental expenses and investments
39
An accounting of money spent or invested specifically
to decrease environmental damage or to benefit the
environment.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Improvement Over Previous
Units
Links:
6 Notices of violation (environmental)
38
Notices of violation (NOVs) for environmental
infractions.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Units
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 9 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
138
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
7 Waste (hazardous) released to the environment
37
Amounts of hazardous materials released into the
environment, total (TRI, PRTR, HAP (Hazardous Air
Pollutants), and similar indices), may include mercury
or lead. Depending on the nationality of the
organization, this could be labeled "TRI" (Toxic
Release Inventory), "substance releases," or something
else.
Year
Data Values
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
Units
Links:
8 Waste (hazardous) produced
35
Sum of all hazardous materials remaining after
production, irrespective of final disposition. Hazardous
wastes include items identified as TRI, PRTR, HAP
(Hazardous Air Pollutants), and similar indices, and
may include mercury or lead. Depending on the
nationality of the organization, this could be labeled
"TRI" (Toxic Release Inventory,) "substance releases" ,
or something else.
Year
Data Values
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
Units
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 10 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
139
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
9 Waste (solid) disposed of
34
Includes solid hazardous and non-hazardous waste
landfilled, incinerated, or transferred.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Improvement Over Previous
Units
Links:
10 Waste (office) recycled
32
Office recycling of paper, cardboard, metal, or plastic.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Units
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 11 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
140
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
11 Waste recycled: solid waste
30
Sum of all solid waste recycled, including hazardous
waste.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Improvement Over Previous
Units
Links:
12 Water used
29
Sum of all water used during operations.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Units
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 12 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
141
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
13 Renewable energy used
27
Energy used from renewable sources such as wind,
solar, hydroelectric, or other renewable sources.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Improvement Over Previous
Units
Links:
14 Energy used (total)
26
Sum of the energy used by the organization in all
different forms, including electricity, fuel, natural gas
and others.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Improvement Over Previous
Units
Links:
SR
1 Sustainable agriculture
272
Efforts to promote sustainable agriculture programs
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 13 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
142
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
2 Access to health care for employees
185
Efforts to provide access to employees, especially
those who are working off-shores
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
3 Women in management
2
Relative numbers of women in management.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
4 Employee volunteerism
72
Efforts to promote employee volunteerism in social
or environmental projects.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
5 Occupational health and safety protection
70
Efforts to provide a safe and healthy working
environment at all sites.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
6 Community education
68
Efforts to support education in the communities
where the company is located.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
7 Employee satisfaction surveys
67
Surveys to monitor employee satisfaction.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 14 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
143
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
8 Community development
66
Efforts to participate in social activities that improve
the quality of life of communities including that of
indigenous people, where the organization operates.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
SR
1 Indigenous people
279
Total number of operations in or adjacent to
Indigenous Peoples' territories, and number and
percentage of operations or sites where there are
formal agreements with Indigenous Peoples'
communities.
Year
Data Values
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
Units
Links:
2 Employee turnover rate
3
Annual employee turnover rate.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Units
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 15 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
144
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
3 Social community investment
81
Amount of money spent on community outreach,
including education grants, donations, and relief effort
funds.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Improvement Over Previous
Units
Links:
4 Health and safety fines
77
Fines levied against a company for health and safety
violations.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Units
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 16 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
145
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
5 Health and safety citations
76
Number of health and safety citations or notices of
violation. If it is stated that there were none, check
lines 1,2,3, 4, and 6.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Improvement Over Previous
Units
Links:
6 Lost workday case rate
75
Number of employee injuries or illnesses that resulted
in one or more lost workdays.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Units
Improvement Over Previous
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 17 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
146
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
7 Recordable incident/accident rate
74
Number of employee incidents or accidents, such as:
“total case incident rate,” “incident rate,” or "accident
rate."
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Year
Data Values
Improvement Over Previous
Units
Links:
SR
1 Sexual harassment
1
Rejection of any form of sexual harassment.
Adoption of Policy
Action to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of
Compliance
Links:
2 Effective abolition of child labor
65
Rejection of illegal child labor by the company or its
affiliates.
Adoption of Policy
Action to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of
Compliance
Links:
3 Reasonable working hours
64
Compliance with applicable laws and industry
standards on working hours, including overtime.
Adoption of Policy
Action to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of
Compliance
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 18 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
147
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
4 Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory
labor
63
Assurance that all employees enter employment with
the company of their own free will, not by compulsion.
Adoption of Policy
Action to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of
Compliance
Links:
5 Fair compensation of employees
62
Assurance that wages paid meet or exceed legal or
industry minimum standard.
Adoption of Policy
Action to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of
Compliance
Links:
6 Free association and collective bargaining of
employees
61
Efforts to respect the right of employees to form and
join trade unions of their choice and to bargain
collectively.
Adoption of Policy
Action to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of
Compliance
Links:
7 Elimination of discrimination in respect to
employment and occupation
60
Commitment not to engage in any kind of
discrimination based on ethnicity, caste, religion,
disability, sex, age, sexual orientation, union
membership, or political affiliation in hiring practices or
employee treatment.
Adoption of Policy
Action to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of
Compliance
Links:
8 Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
59
Commitment to oppose any corporal/hard labor
punishment, mental/physical coercion, or verbal abuse.
Adoption of Policy
Action to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of
Compliance
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 19 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
146
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
9 Political contributions
7
Policy about political contributions.
Adoption of Policy
Action to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of
Compliance
Links:
10 Bribery
8
Rejection of bribery
Adoption of Policy
Action to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of
Compliance
Links:
11 Anti-corruption practices
58
Efforts to uphold the highest standards of business
ethics and integrity. May be found under a Code of
Conduct.
Adoption of Policy
Action to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of
Compliance
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 20 of 20
www.roberts.cmc.edu
147
Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Ajinomoto, Archer Daniels Midland,
Associated British Foods, BRF-Brasil
Foods, Bunge, Campbell Soup,
ConAgra Foods, Corn Products
International, Danone, Dean Foods,
General Mills, Golden Agri-Resources,
Grupo Bimbo, Hershey, Hillshire
Brands, HJ Heinz, Hormel Foods, J. M.
Smuckers, JBS, Kellogg, Kerry Group,
Kraft Foods, McCormick & Co, Nestlé,
Olam International, Saputo, Smithfield
Foods, Tyson Foods, Unilever, and
Wilmar
International
Roberts Environmental Center
The Roberts Environmental Center is a research institute at Claremont McKenna College, endowed by George R.
Roberts, Founding Partner, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. The Center is managed by faculty and staff, and its research,
including the material in this report, is done by students at the Claremont Colleges.
Claremont McKenna College
Claremont McKenna College, a member of the Claremont Colleges, is a highly selective, independent, coeducational,
residential, undergraduate liberal arts college with a curricular emphasis on economics, government, and public
affairs.
The Claremont Colleges
The Claremont Colleges form a consortium of five undergraduate liberal arts colleges and two graduate institutions
based on the Oxford/Cambridge model. The consortium offers students diverse opportunities and resources typically
found only at much larger universities. The consortium members include Claremont McKenna College, Harvey Mudd
College, Pitzer College, Pomona College, Scripps College, Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences, and the
Clremont Graduate University which—includes the Peter F. Drucker and Masatoshi Ito Graduate School of
Management.
Contact Information
Dr. J. Emil Morhardt, Director, Phone: 909-621-8190, email: emorhardt@cmc.edu
Elgeritte Adidjaja, Research Fellow, Phone: 909-621-8698, email: eadidjaja@cmc.edu
Roberts Environmental Center, Claremont McKenna College, 925 N. Mills Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711-5916, USA.