HIST 300: Historical Methods Instructor: Terry L. Shoptaugh Office: 409 Livingston Lord Library (the University Archives) Phone: 236-2379 (office) 236-6068 (home, I turn the phone off after 10PM) website: web.mnstate.edu TEXTS: John Lewis Gaddis, The Landscape of History (Oxford University Press, 2004) paper Amy Levin, ed., Defining Memory (Altamira Press, 2007) paper COURSE OBJECTIVES: This course is designed to introduce students to methodological and philosophical basics in the study of history and how these are employed by historians in publications, teaching, exhibits, and museum work. To this end, students will learn - To become familiarize with the proper resources used by historians to locate, examine and present evidence. To understand the variety of source materials used by historians in research, writing and exhibition; and recognize the limitations of specific types of resources. To obtain an overview of historiography and the “metaphysical” studies of historiography that have great influence in the history profession. To understand how museums and historical societies have produced and promoted “public history.” To understand how the importance of history, as expressed by historians, is directly related to a better understanding of humanity. The general format for this class will be very Socratic – there will be far more questions than answers covered in class (and probably in the assignments as well). The final goals here are: 1) discover what methods have worked well for recovering accurate and valuable interpretations of the past; 2) what will work for you in your quest to be an historian. Assignments and grades: The final grade will be based on 3 assignments: 1. An assignment to review the historiography of the topic of your major paper, explained in another separate handout. 2. An assignment that will require you to see, examine a museum and create an exhibit -explained in detail in a separate handout. 3. A paper that will be a research paper on a topic. See separate assignment handout. I will grade this paper for both content and writing ability. Final grades will be averaged from the 3 grades of the assignments. LATE ASSIGNMENTS WILL BE REDUCED IN GRADE. SOME TIPS FOR DOING YOUR BEST: 1. COME TO CLASS. Granted, college is a great chance to get out on your own, and a lot of things will seem a lot more interesting than classes, but you’ve paid the tuition and you might as well get your money’s worth. Also, sad but true, the better grades invariably go to the ones who go to classes. 2. DO THE READING. College-level work is quite different from high-school level work, especially in the volume of reading you will be expected to do for classes. So it is absolutely essential for you to keep up with the reading assigned for your classes. Read carefully. Pay attention to the introductions and conclusions of the chapters in the text. But read the entire chapter. 3. TAKE NOTES DURING LECTURES. Believe it or not, professors do not give all these lectures you’ll hear simply to enjoy the sounds of their own voices (might be some truth to that rumor.) Pay attention to what is written on the board, what is pointed out on the slides and the overheads. I will try to give a summary of each section, so pay special attention to that. But, above all, keep good notes. 4. ASK QUESTIONS. Yes, it is true, that if you ask questions you will learn more. The mental effort to frame a question helps you organize the topic in your memory. It also helps you remember the details later – like at test time. 5. IF YOUR’RE HAVING TROUBLE, ASK FOR HELP. The taxpayers of Minnesota (i.e. you and your family) fund programs for tutoring and other help. They (you) also are paying me to teach this course, so if you need more help, come and tell me. Late or Missing Work: I will not accept late essays for full credit unless you have made arrangements with me before the scheduled time. Only extenuating circumstances (and ones that you can document) will merit extensions for late work. For all other late written assignments or exams I deduct one grade for each day it is late. You must turn in all assignments and take all the exams in order to pass the course. Academic Dishonesty: Cases of academic dishonesty will result in failure for the assignment or for the course, as supported by university policy, and they will be reported to university administration. Unintentional cases of academic dishonesty (such as improper use of sources on the essay assignment) are both easy for a professor to spot and easy for a student to avoid. Please visit me during office hours if you are unsure about how to document a source. Disability Access Statement: Students with disabilities who believe they may need an accommodation in this class must contact Greg Toutges, Coordinator of Disability Services at 299-5859, CMU 222 as soon as possible to ensure that accommodations are implemented in a timely fashion. Class Schedule and Reading Assignments Week 1 2 3 4 Topics Readings Introduction to course “Doing” History – Facts and Interpretations Begin Gaddis (complete by week 3 Assignments, exams, etc Historicism – How events happen, what they mean, Historiography assignment due How it’s done – skills, composition, exposition, and exhibition Outline and bibliography due 5 6 Morison, “History as a Literary Art” (on reserve) 7 8 9 10 The past at the grass roots Levin text, articles by -- public history, local Vallance, Gable, and Price history Levin text, articles by Langford, Sandweiss, and Levin (Can Museums Be Bought?) 11 12 13 14 15 First draft of paper due Museums assignment due Careers in history POST GRAD POSSIBILITIES Final paper due How your papers will be graded (proceeding from poor to excellent): Very Poor (Grade of "F"): The paper does not meet the required standards – It is too short (at least 1600 words); the evidence in support of your points is poor (or there is no supporting evidence); the paper is very poorly written, is incoherent, and/or irrelevant. There are numerous incomplete sentences, word choice is very poor, and/or incorrect words are used. Poor (Grade of "D"): The paper has only a marginal grasp of the material. It summarizes the most obvious aspects of the material, but provides almost no supporting evidence or examples. It shows little or no organization and contains major errors on grammar and sentence structure. Average (Grade of "C"): The paper demonstrates basic understanding of the subject, but has some deficiencies. Its organization is acceptable, but it shows nothing more than a basic reiteration of the readings and material. It probably has grammatical errors. It likely also shows signs of being written in haste, with mistakes and sloppiness which should have been corrected with more effort. Good (Grade of "B"): The organization is clear and coherent, although minor weaknesses may be present. It provides good, solid evidence in support of the main points. Any errors in punctuation, spelling and grammar are minor. Excellent (Grade of "A"): The paper is very well organized, is clear in its arguments and main points, is grammatically correct, and progresses logically, with all the remarks relevant to the topic. The evidence given in support was carefully selected and aptly expressed. There is some original thought in the conclusion. Errors in punctuation, spelling and grammar are minimal.