Rural Municipality of Buckland PSAB 3150 Infrastructure Asset Summary The information provided is intended to support rural municipalities (RM’s) who are striving for PS 3150 compliance. This method is outlined in six basic steps, which include: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Development and Review of PS 3150 Policy Determining Inventory Information Source Infrastructure Inventory Asset Types Process Used for Inventorying Infrastructure Inventory Asset Types Process Used for Valuing Infrastructure Inventory Asset Types Inputting Information into the www.sasktca.ca Asset Register Step 1 – Development and Review of PS 3150 Policy The first step in the process of becoming PS 3150 compliant is the creation of a PS 3150 policy. A sample policy, “TCA Policy Template” can be found on the www.sasktca.ca/resources website. Municipalities can either use the provided policy template or develop their own. When setting the PS 3150 policy, a threshold that is appropriate for the particular municipality must be determined. For the pilot project a threshold of $5,000 was used for all individual assets and a threshold of $25,000 was used for all pooled assets in the RM. Within the policy, asset classes owned by the municipality should also be identified and assigned an expected useful life. The document called “TCA Reference Manual”, available on www.sasktca.ca/resources, has a list of standard asset classes along with useful life estimates provided in Appendix C. Once the PS 3150 policy has been drafted it should be reviewed with both your auditor and your council prior to continuing on to step 2. Step 2 – Determining Inventory Information Source Once the PS 3150 policy has been reviewed the inventory listing can be created. The first step in creating a PS 3150 inventory is selecting the information source. Alternatives for information sources include: RM map GIS based maps Internet based maps The RM map showing road locations and classifications is the most complete and accessible resource for creating the road inventory. The RM map also shows the location of the roads as well as the road classification. As well, these maps are printed to a defined scale allowing for easy measurement of asset length. The RM map can be used in conjunction with other information provided by Saskatchewan Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure as well as local knowledge. This RM map will need to be supplemented by engineered or municipality maps for any hamlets or resort villages present within the RM. For inventory and valuation methods of hamlets or resort villages, refer to Village of Denzil PSAB 3150 – Infrastructure and General Assets. If RM maps are available they should be used, if these are unavailable, a combination of municipal maps and the advice of experienced community members is most likely the best option. For the pilot, RM maps were used for the inventory of all rural roads. The village staff identified the location and class of any additional roads not represented on the map as well as years of construction for most roads. Step 3 – Infrastructure Inventory Asset Types There are many types of linear assets that need to be considered for rural municipalities. A list of rural linear assets for RM’s is listed, in part1, below. Linear assets that were recorded in the RM pilot are listed in bold. Roads Road Structure (Land under road, Subgrade, Culverts) Road Surface (Gravel, Asphalt, etc.) Curb and Gutter Swales Sidewalks and Paths (cement sidewalks, Asphalt paths) Bridges Bridges Oversize Culverts Oversize Culverts Water Water mains (Hydrants, Valves, Reducers, etc.) Water services to lots Water source (Wells, nearby community, etc.) Water reservoirs Water treatment plant Sewer Sewer mains (Manholes, Cleanouts, etc.) Sewer services to lots Sewage lagoon Sewage treatment Storm Water Storm water mains Storm water services Storm water holding ponds Storm water treatment More asset classes are listed in Appendix C of the “TCA Reference Manual” which can be found at http://www.sasktca.ca/assets/File/TCA%20Reference%20Manual.pdf. 1 Step 4 – Process Used for Inventorying Infrastructure Assets Road Surface and Structure The first asset that was inventoried was roads. As shown above road assets in the RM of Buckland include road structures and gravel surfaces. The only road surface type in the RM of Buckland was a gravel surface. Through discussion with accounting advisors, it was determined that roads with a gravel surface can be considered a single asset (as opposed to separating the road structure, from the road surface). Combining the road structure and road surface should only be considered for gravel surfaced roads. The inventory of the roads (structure and surface) was completed using the RM map, provided by the RM of Buckland. The locations of all roads were determined from these plans; the plans were reviewed by the RM for accuracy and completeness. The road assets were inventoried using the process outlined below: a) The road assets were segmented based on land sections. b) A single road asset was measured from the beginning of a section of land to the beginning of the next section; this was done for all township roads and range roads. c) If the road classification or year of construction changed within the road segment, the segment was subdivided so that all properties were unique (years of construction, classification). d) The length of the road segment was determined using the scale provided on the RM map. e) The years of construction for roads in the pilot were determined using the “Road Year of Construction” found on the www.sasktca.ca website, “Road Year of Construction” has a list of recorded dates of construction for some rural roads, however the list should be reviewed for confirm accuracy. The years of construction for all roads were completed and reviewed for accuracy by RM staff. a) The asset useful life was estimated in Step 1: Development and Review of PS 3150 Policy. For the pilot, roads were assigned a useful life of 40 years. Bridges The locations of bridges in the RM of Buckland were recorded in the “Full Bridge Inventory at January 2008” found on the www.sasktca.ca website, “Full Bridge Inventory at January 2008” has a list of bridges from Saskatchewan Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure. Bridges are listed by RM and include information on length, type, and date of construction for the bridges. This bridge listing may not be complete and should be reviewed for accuracy and completeness by RM staff. The bridges were inventoried in the following steps: a) Each bridge asset was recorded as one asset including the bridge piers, abutments, deck etc. based on the listing in “Full Bridge Inventory at 2008” and supplemented by RM staff. b) The span of each of the bridges was recorded, (this is required for valuation and is available in the “Full Bridge Inventory at 2008”). c) The years of construction for the bridges was determined from the “Full Bridge Inventory at 2008” and confirmed by RM staff. d) The pilot policy assigned a useful life of 60 years to all bridges. Oversize Culverts The classification of an oversize or large culvert is not clearly defined and should be indicated within the PS 3150 policy. A culvert is deemed oversized by the Saskatchewan Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure based on a combination of culvert diameter and flow rate. For the pilot, the oversized culverts in the RM had a diameter of 1600mm or larger. Culverts with diameters smaller than that specified as oversize do not need to be inventoried as these smaller culverts have been included in the replacement cost of the road. The locations of oversized culverts in the RM of Buckland were recorded in the “Full Culvert Inventory at February 2008” found on the www.sasktca.ca website, “Full Culvert Inventory at February 2008” has a list of oversized culverts from Saskatchewan Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure. Oversize culverts are listed by RM and include information on culvert length, size, type, and date of construction for the oversize culverts. This oversize listing is a good starting point, but is generally not a complete inventory. Local knowledge should be employed to confirm the completeness and accuracy of information. The oversize culverts were inventoried in the following steps: a) Each oversize asset was recorded as one asset based on the listing in “Full Culvert Inventory at February 2008” and supplemented by RM staff. b) The size and length of each culvert was recorded, (this is required for valuation and is available in the “Full Culvert Inventory at February 2008”). c) The years of construction for the oversize culverts was determined from the “Full Culvert Inventory at February 2008” and confirmed by RM staff. d) The pilot policy assigned a useful life of 35 years to oversize culverts. Step 5 – Process Used for Valuing Infrastructure Inventory Asset Types When valuing assets it is important to consider the relative importance of the information you are searching for. PS 3150 is not intended to be a task in recovering information from 40 years ago. To determine what level of detail is required for the valuation the following chart can be used. Figure 3: PS 3150 Valuation Flowchart Is the Asset Old? (Past its useful life) Yes No Value the Asset at $1 Yes Are Historical Costs Available? Value using historical costs No Yes No Historical Costs Available Value using replacement costs (Linear costing survey or other sources) Road Surface and Structure Valuation of the road assets was based on the framework shown above in Figure 3. According to Figure 3 the first step in valuation is to determine if the asset is past its useful life. A large percentage of the roads in the RM of Buckland were constructed prior to 1967. These roads are all past their useful life of 40 years and based on Figure 3 they were assigned a nominal value ($1). For the remaining roads there were no historical costs available so an estimated replacement cost was used for valuation. This was done using the rural road costing model which has been supplied to each rural municipality. The rural road costing model is a tool for estimating replacement cost of rural municipality roads based on location. This tool was sent to RM administrators to assist in valuation of roads that have an unknown historical cost. Ensure that the user manual, included in the rural road costing model package, is reviewed prior to using model estimates for valuation purposes. For the pilot the rural road costing model was employed with the actual RM of Buckland gravel costs. The estimated replacement costs ($2002), for the RM of Buckland are shown below in Table 5. For more information regarding the rural road costing model, including why a valuation year of 2002 was used, refer to the model user guidelines forwarded with the costing model package. Table 5: RM of Buckland Rural Road Costing Model (2002) RM of Buckland Primary Grid $ 40,573/km Grid Gravel $ 32,537/km Main Farm Access $ 27,352/km Trail Dirt Road If Trails or dirt roads are unconstructed they can be applied a nominal value ($1) The rural road costing model provides estimates for the three common classifications of roads. Roads that are not included in the estimates can be valued using an equivalent class or a portion of one of the replacement cost estimates, for example a municipal road may be determined to have an equivalent replacement cost as the Main Farm Access road, or it may be estimated that the replacement cost is, for example, 50% or 75% of the cost of one of the classifications listed above. For the pilot the only road type not included in the Rural Road Costing Model was the classification of Municipal Road. It was determined by RM staff that municipal roads would have a replacement cost similar to that of the Main Farm Access. Bridges Valuation of the bridge assets was also based on the framework shown above in Figure 3. Only two of the 16 bridges in the RM of Buckland inventory were past their designated useful life of 60 years and were applied a nominal value of $1. The majority of bridges in the RM of Buckland were still within their designated useful lives. These bridges were valued using a few different resources including the North Central Transportation Planning Committee (NCTPC) Municipal Bridge Analysis provided by the RM as well as “Estimated Bridge Replacement Costs” found on the www.sasktca.ca website; “Estimated Bridge Replacement Costs” provides replacement estimates for bridges of standard span lengths, provided by Saskatchewan Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure. The Municipal Bridge Analysis included a listing of all bridges within the RM along with estimated replacement costs for 2009, due to the availability of the NCTPC report; this was used for the valuation of the bridges. In the absence of a similar document the “Estimated Bridge Replacement Costs” provides estimates for replacement of common bridge spans. Ensure that the year that the replacement cost is estimated for is recorded as this needs to be included on the asset register. Oversize Culverts Like the other assets, valuation of the oversize culvert assets was completed using the framework shown above in Figure 3. None of the oversize bridges within the municipality were past their designated useful life of 35 years, therefore all oversize culverts required either a historical cost or an estimated replacement cost. The oversize culverts were valued using the “Large Culvert Replacement Cost Estimates” found on the www.sasktca.ca website, “Large Culvert Replacement Cost Estimates” estimate the average provincial replacement cost for oversize culverts. These estimates should only be used in the absence of historical costs or regionalized data. The “Large Culvert Replacement Cost Estimates” estimate the replacement for culverts based on the pipe diameter. The replacement cost estimates are for the year of 2008. Step 6 – Inputting Information into the www.sasktca.ca Asset Register Once the information had been assembled for Steps 1- 5, all information required to achieve PS 3150 compliance has been established. To complete the PS 3150 process for linear assets the acquired information needs to be transferred into the Asset Register provided on www.sasktca.ca. The first step is to download the Asset Register from the www.sasktca.ca website, ensure that you have downloaded the correct version (asset register for excel97, or asset register for more recent versions of excel). Every time that you open the Asset Register it is necessary to enable macros (please refer to the asset register guide for details on use of the register). When using the Asset Register all information is input under the Asset Listing tab. At the top of the Asset Listing page is a cell showing the current year. All assets acquired prior to 2007 should be added to the register with the current year set to 2007. For assets acquired after 2007 the current year should be set to the appropriate year prior to adding the Asset Id. The columns on the Asset Listing tab are described in Table 6 below. Table 6: Asset Register - Asset Listing Columns Column Description Asset ID The name you associate with a particular asset (e.g. Sidewalk-1) Asset Description Allows users to identify an asset (e.g. street name, or asset details) Location Asset Class Allows users to further identify an asset by location (e.g. land location, street name) Users choose the class from a drop down menu (e.g. linear assets for roads, water mains, sanitary mains) Functional Area The department or division responsible for the asset Acquired/Donated/Contributed The source of the asset Asset Account General ledger associated with the asset Accumulated Amortization Account General ledger associated with the accumulated amortization of the asset Amortization Expense Account General ledger associated with the expenses in regards to amortization of the asset General Ledger In Service Year The year an asset enters into service Useful Life The estimated useful life (with regards to accounting) of the asset, defined in the policy Actual Historical Cost If known, the cost of the asset at the time of installation or purchase Reproduction/Replacement Cost Valuation Year Residual Value Year Added The current replacement/reproduction/appraised cost of the asset – not required if actual historical cost is known The year of the reproduction/replacement/appraisal value assigned to the asset – not required if historical cost is known The estimated net realizable value of a tangible capital asset at the end of its useful life (ex. Salvage) The year in which the asset was added to the inventory (added automatically based on what is set as the current year) Once the Asset Listing table has been completed, the Asset Register will automatically calculate amortization, net book value, etc. These values can be reviewed under the Continuity Schedule tab. If there are any disposals or write downs of assets these are added under the Continuity Schedule tab.