Please help us plan future Media Ethics Workshops. Your opinion is
appreciated. You may select more than one option for each question.
If you attended the event online, please complete and email to
ccardosi@kent.edu.
1) Did you attend the Poynter KSU Media Ethics Workshop in person in
Franklin Hall?
☐Yes
☐No
2) Why did you attend the “Dirty Politics?” online ethics Workshop?
☐Personal or professional interest
☐Class requirement
☐To network with media & bloggers
☐Making a presentation or panelist
☐Represent my company/organization ☐Other
3) Overall I found “Dirty Politics?” the Poynter KSU Media Ethics
Workshop to be:
☐Interesting, engaging
☐Ambitious, too much at once
☐Uneven
☐Other (explain)
4) The issue of political media ethics:
☐Is important to me personally
☐Is important to me professionally
☐Is important for traditional media
☐Is important for online media
☐Is vast; deserves more discussion
☐Is not really important
5) My two favorite sessions were:
☐What the Fact?
☐Politics and Perception:
The Role of a Responsible Press
☐ Why Can’t We All Get Along?
Civility and Social Media in Politics
☐ A Conversation with Connie
☐ Not Your Mother’s Politics:
Gender and Politics
☐ Plan of Attack: Political
Advertising & Campaign
Communications
1
☐Best Practices for Today &
Tomorrow
Comments:
6) My least favorite session was:
☐What the Fact
☐Politics and Perception:
The Role of a Responsible Press
☐ “Why Can’t We All Get Along?”
Civility and Social Media in Politics
☐ A Conversation with Connie
☐ Not Your Mother’s Politics:
Women and Politics
☐ Plan of Attack: Political
Advertising & Campaign
Communications
☐Best Practices for Today &
Tomorrow
Comments:
7)I participated in live blogging during the Workshop:
☐Yes
☐No
If Yes, I participated on:
☐Twitter ☐On a personal website
☐Other_____________________
8)I followed some or all of the Workshop via live stream on the event
Website
☐Yes
☐No
9)The Kent State JMC facility, Franklin Hall, was
☐Ideal for such a conference
☐Too crowded with classes &
attendees
☐Fitted with the right technology
☐ In need of more/different
technology
☐Easy to navigate
☐ Difficult to navigate
Comments:
2
11)The quality of the food was:
☐ Fresh and flavorful
☐ Not good
Comments:
Please rate
Value/Usefulness of Content
5= Very valuable and useful
4= Valuable and useful
3= Some value and use
2= Limited value and use
1= Poor use of time
☐ Average
☐Other
Quality of Program/Discussion
5= Very clear and stimulating
4= Clear and stimulating
3= Neutral
2= Unclear/not very stimulating
1= Muddy and unpleasant
Morning Session 1: What the Fact? Fourth-year findings from Poynter’s
Sense-Making Study
Value/Usefulness of Content
Quality of Presentation/Discussion
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
Comments:
Morning Session 2: Politics and Perception: Role of a Responsible Press
Value/Usefulness of Content
Quality of Presentation/Discussion
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
Comments:
Morning Session 3: Why Can’t We All Get Along? Civility & Social Media in
Politics
Value/Usefulness of Content
Quality of Presentation/Discussion
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
Comments:
Morning Session 4: Best Practices for Today and Tomorrow
Value/Usefulness of Content
Quality of Presentation/Discussion
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
Comments:
3
Lunch Keynote: A Conversation with Connie
Value/Usefulness of Content
Quality of Presentation/Discussion
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
Comments:
Afternoon Session 1: Not Your Mother’s Politics: Women & Gender
Value/Usefulness of Content
Quality of Presentation/Discussion
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
Comments:
Afternoon Session 2: Plan of Attack: Political Advertising & Campaign
Communications
Value/Usefulness of Content
Quality of Presentation/Discussion
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
☐5 ☐4 ☐3 ☐2 ☐1
Comments:
Please provide us with your thoughts on future Workshops including topics,
ideas, possible speakers, and/or any other suggestions, thoughts, or
comments:
Your name (optional):
Your company or affiliation (optional):
4