Research Paper Scoring Scale
Top Score
4 (100)
Proficient
3 (90)
Average
2 (75)
Insufficient
1 (60)
Comp II
These papers are extremely well written and offer thorough analysis and discussion
of the arguments presented.
Writers demonstrate stylistic maturity through sophisticated syntax, diction and
organization.
Author writes with conviction, clearly articulating specific arguments, and with a
balance of discussion and research.
Evidence and support is abundant and relevant, and used to effectively clarify
discussion.
Discussion is complex and exhaustive of topic, including background information.
Opposition is thoroughly brought into the discussion.
Mechanics are not flawless, but demonstrate close proofreading and attention.
MLA format is exemplary.
These papers are also well written, but less effectively than those in the top range.
Stylistically, they are not as mature in syntax and diction.
A specific position is established, and clear arguments are presented, but the
discussion is not as complex or exhaustive as they could be.
There is a balance between analysis and research.
Evidence and support are used consistently, and as a part of a relevant discussion;
there is a sufficient amount and variety of critical sources.
Conclusions show significant investment in the discussion.
Extensive background information is given and provides effective context.
Organization is fluid. Grammatical errors are present, but not distracting to meaning.
Opposition is addressed, with refutation or accommodations evident.
All MLA formatting expectations are met.
These papers provide a position.
Background information is evident, but not extensive.
Organization impedes content.
Support is evident, but not necessarily relevant or used effectively to make a point;
sources may not be most varied or effective.
Discussion needs development; ideas and research are presented, but conclusions
do not indicate significant investment.
Discussion may be more summary and paraphrase and reactionary, rather than
analysis.
Opposition is addressed, but insufficiently discussed.
Tone may not appropriately suit the purpose.
Vague diction and ineffective syntax are prevalent.
Grammatical errors are somewhat distracting to meaning.
Opposition is insufficiently or ineffectively addressed.
MLA formatting has significant errors.
These papers are unacceptably brief or poorly written.
Analysis is minimal, the background is insufficient, and the overall discussion of topic
is superficial or underdeveloped.
Tone is inappropriate for a formal assignment.
Mechanical and grammatical errors are abundant and distracting; little attention has
been paid to format and mechanics.
Organization is ineffective.
Opposition is absent or ill-defined.