What were the two opposing views or concepts on the colonization of New France? The two opposing views centered around whether New France should develop as a colony based on settlement or as a colony based on the exploitation of the fur trade. Characteristics of a colony based on settlement Its purpose was to create a society in New France similar to that in France through settlement. To have such a colony it would need to send to New France farmers, priests, soldiers, administrators, women, and artisans. The colonizers wanted a diversified economy not an economy based solely on the exploitation of the fur trade. This concept of colonization had the support of the King, religious orders and colonizers. Characteristics of a colony based on the fur trade Its purpose was to exploit the fur trade for the benefit of merchants and fur trading monopoly companies such as the Company of 100 Associates. Basically, they wanted New France to be a fur-trading outpost. To have such a colony it would need mainly men meaning merchants, coureurs de bois, independent traders and company agents. Settlers were not welcome as they were expensive to bring over and they could act as competitors in the fur trade. The fur traders only wanted to develop and exploit the fur trade since it did not require a large initial investment and it was very profitable. This type of colony had the support of the fur trading companies, fur traders and merchants. Throughout most of New France's history, despite some attempts at settlement, the colony of New France was based on the exploitation of the fur trade. A major factor behind this was the belief in the economic theory of mercantilism. Coureur de Bois in Typical Dress Hemming /National Archives of Canada/C-5746