Estimation of Site Response for Kanto Plain by Use of the Data from Dense Strong Motion Seismograph Array Kenichi Tsuda1, Yoshiaki Hisada2, and Kazuki Koketsu³ Abstract: We have applied nonlinear inversion analysis to estimate the site response for the Kanto area using data of the 852 stations constituting the SK-net (Seismic Kanto Strong motion-network) K-NET, and KiK-net from nineteen moderate-sized earthquakes that have occurred surrounding the Kanto Area. We have determined: source parameters (seismic moment and corner frequency) for each event; quality factor Q(f) for the path based on the borehole records. We also determined the frequency-dependent factors for the borehole sites as well as for the surface sites. Our inversion scheme has the advantage of being independent of constraints on site response at a reference station. The resulting seismic moment values not only agree with these determined by NIED (National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention), but also are proportional to the fc-3. We found a frequency dependent quality factor for the path; Q(f ) =107 f 0.52. The site response values, averaged over 0.5 – 1.0 Hz, correlate well with the shear wave velocities for the upper 30m (AVS30) and the depth to the seismological basement (shear wave velocity ≥ 3.0 km/s). These site response values also correlate well with the areas of unconsolidated sediments, especially swampy land. The estimation of site response based on the quantitative geophysical parameters (e.g. AVS30 or depth to the basement) as well as on the qualitative surface geology classification can lead the better understandings of spatial characteristics of site response around the Kanto region. Introduction The Kanto area, the most populated area in Japan, is situated in a zone of very complex tectonics (Figure1), in which the Philippine Sea Plate is being subducted beneath the North-American Plate, while the Pacific plate is being subducted beneath the Philippine Sea Plate (Ishida, 1992, Sato et al., 2005). Because of its complexity, this area has a history of hazardous earthquakes, such as the 1923 Kanto Earthquake and the 1703 Genroku-Kanto Earthquake (Furumura, 2004; Kobayashi and Koketsu, 2005; Tanaka et al., 2005b). Also the existence of thick sedimentary basin below this area could amplify ground motions drastically that causes the damage to this populated area. Thus, the seismic hazard mitigation for the next hazardous earthquakes is the primary issue. Because the better correlation between soil type and the degree of damage was reported for the past hazardous events, such as 1923 Kanto earthquake, 1985 Michoacan earthquake, 1994 Northridge earthquake, and 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu (Kobe) (e.g., Kawase, 2005), the estimation of site response is very important to the seismic hazard mitigation. Seismic hazard mitigation for the next hazardous earthquakes is the primary issue for this area. Furthermore, the huge damage on Kobe city from the recent 1995 Kobe earthquake provided the impact for many local governments in this populated Kanto area to cooperate in the installation of a strong-motion seismograph array for the purpose of seismic hazard mitigation. The result brings the SK-net (Seismic Kanto Research Project, 2001). -1- One of the advantages of using this kind of array is to get a better understanding of the effects of surface geology. Recently many studies have tried to predict ground motion level for the 1923 Kanto earthquake by using numerical simulation (Sato et al., 1998, 1999: Dan et al., 2000) to have a better prediction for future large events. However, the estimations of the effects of surface geology especially to the high frequency range interest to the engineers (≥ 1 Hz) are not enough. Thus, incorporating better estimation the effects of surface geology into the ground motion prediction is essential. In order to quantify site effects, Borcherdt (1970) introduced the spectral ratio approach by taking ratios of the Fourier amplitude spectrum of soil sites to a rock site. Iwata and Irikura (1988) developed a method to derive site response from data that many researchers have applied to estimate site response for diverse geological conditions. They also tried to find parameters to correlate with site response values. Field and Southern California Earthquake Center Phase III Working Group (2000) found that the average shear wave velocity in the upper 30m (AVS30) of soil was indicative of variation in site amplification factors. They also found that the degree of amplification was strongly related to basin depth, but cautioned that the correlation might be spurious and connected to some other site characteristics. Uchiyama and Midorikawa (2003) recently compiled the results of site response based on the site classification. In order to address these problems, the accumulation of site response values from a large number of stations located on a variety of soil conditions is necessary. In this study, we have tried to estimate site response for the whole Kanto area. The initial step was the isolation of source and path parameters by nonlinear inversion analysis (Tsuda et al., 2006). We used the S wave amplitudes. The absolute site response (response relative to the seismological basement, usually VS: 3 km/sec) is estimated because the estimates of borehole response derived from the inversion are independent of the reference site. After the source and path parameters are determined by inversion, the borehole site response is simply the difference between the observed spectrum and the predicted spectrum—based on the source and path parameters. Once stable source and path parameters have been established, a spectrum for each event is computed for each surface site. The ratio between the observed spectrum and computed spectrum is the surface site response. We compute an average surface site response based on all events that are analyzed. Having obtained this average site response, we look for correlations between site response and surface geology. While the classification of surface geology is a qualitative estimation, the data is useful for analyzing the gross characteristics of spatial variation of site response. The average site responses are compared with average shear wave velocities in the upper 30m of surface soil, with depths to the seismological basement and with surface geology. Because our site responses represent the relative response from seismological basement to the surface i.e. independent of a reference site, they can bring a better understanding of spatial characteristics of site responses and be useful for the ground motion prediction for future earthquakes. Data Set The SK-net began operation after 1995 Kobe earthquakes for the purpose of seismic hazard mitigation around Kanto area. The eleven local governments and three institutions (listed in the Table 1) developed the seismic array; ERI (Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo) collects the data. The array consists of three-component accelerometers for more than 800 surface stations and more than 70 borehole stations (Seismic Kanto Research Project, 2001, Table 1). -2- Since 1997, this array has recorded numerous earthquakes over a broad range of magnitudes. Each accelerometer is digitized at 200 samples /sec for the KiK-net and the Yokohama City Strong-Motion Network, and at 100 samples /sec for other networks. The K-NET and KiK-net arrays are managed by the National Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED). Each station has been logged for P-wave velocity, S-wave velocity, and density to the depth range up to 10-100m. For this study, we selected 19 events that occurred around Kanto area. Each event was recorded on almost all of the KiK-net borehole accelerographs as well as most surface stations (Table 2). Because we used only two horizontal components of the record, the total number of records is 10220 (20440 components). The epicenters, shown as solid red circles, and the station distribution are shown in Figure 2. The solid blue triangle denotes the station used to determine source and path parameters. The focal depths are greater than 50 km; magnitudes range between 4.5 - 5.8. Average hypocentral distances to the array vary from 50 to 130 km (Figure 2). In Table 2, we give the source location, focal depth and magnitude determined by the NIED for each event. For our analysis, we used the two horizontal components at each site. A 10 s time window beginning 1.0 sec before the first S-wave arrival was picked for all events. We applied a cosine window taper of 0.5 sec to both ends of the record. After the Fourier amplitude spectrum of each component was calculated, we used vector summation of the two horizontal components as the amplitude spectrum in the frequency range of 0.5–20 Hz. For the events occurring in the Kanto area, Kinoshita (1992) showed that f max (Hanks, 1982) is usually greater than 25 Hz; thus the effects from f max are likely to be small within our frequency range. Since most level of ground shaking, such as peak ground acceleration (PGA) is smaller than 200 gal, the effects of nonlinear site response are likely to be negligible (Beresvev, 2002). Method The observed ground motion—for linear response—can be expressed as a convolution of the source, path and site. In the frequency domain, we can write this convolution relation as a multiplication: A( f ) S( f ) Site( f ) R1efR /Q( f ) (1) where f is frequency, A( f ) is the acceleration amplitude spectrum of the recorded ground motion, S( f ) is the source spectrum, Q ( f ) is the quality factor, which is assumed to be frequency dependent, Q( f ) Qo f , Site( f ) is the site response amplitude, R is the distance from source (Table 2) to site, and is the average shear wave velocity of the medium (3.7 km/s, Yamanaka et al., 1998). To estimate the site response, it is necessary to isolate these three factors from observed records. In general, isolating each element requires constraints to avoid tradeoffs A standard constraint is to impose a condition of Site( f ) at a rock among these three elements. -3- station. This method has already been applied extensively in many studies (e.g., Iwata and Irikura, 1988; Bonilla et al., 1997; Yamanaka et al., 1998; Kinoshita and Ohike, 2002; Kawakami et al., 2005). Another approach is to define a source spectrum S( f ) for a specific ‘reference’ event (Moya et al., 2000 and Moya and Irikura, 2003). Because some shallow borehole records (reference station) may be contaminated the borehole response itself, we used a method to separate the source, path and site effect that is independent of a reference station (Tsuda et al., 2006). Equation 2 uses Boatwright’s (1978) representation of a 2 source spectrum (Brune, 1970), in which the amplitude of the source spectrum has a nonlinear dependence on the corner frequency: S( f ) CM o (2f ) 2 f c2 where C f 4 G0 F rad 4πVs 3 f c4 0.5 (2) (3) C depends on the radiation parameter of the source: Frad [we used the average S-wave radiation pattern coefficient of 0.63, (Boore and Boatwright, 1984)], the material parameters for source area (3000 [kg/m³] for density and 4.5 [km/s] for shear wave velocity) and the free surface effect Go is included. The seismic moment Mo and corner frequency fc are determined from the spectrum (Brune, 1970). Including the path effect introduces a nonlinear dependence on frequency when the attenuation parameter Q(f) is assumed to have a power law dependence on frequency: Q(f)=Qo f . Because of the nonlinear relationship between the data and source and path parameters, we use a Heat Bath algorithm (Sen and Stofa, 1995) to invert for the four parameters: Mo, fc, Qo, and . Having these parameters, we derive a frequency-dependent site response. We start by using data from 10 events of similar size (Mw: 4.0-5.3) having been recorded on more than 50 borehole accelerometers of KiK-net, plus three ERI basement stations. We assume that the initial borehole response is independent of frequency and then invert the data for all 10 events to determine Mo, fc, Qo, and. Our first estimate of borehole response is the difference between observed and predicted spectrum. This estimate is used to invert for Mo, but only for f ≤ 1.0 Hz, which yields a new estimate of seismic moment by using initial values for other path parameters (Kinoshita and Ohike, 2002). We again invert all of the data to find fc, Qo, and . This produces a second estimate of the site response: the difference between the observed spectrum and the predicted spectrum, based on the current values of Mo, fc, Qo, and. This process is repeated until the difference between observed and predicted spectra (borehole response) converges. In this way we derive a borehole response that depends on frequency and simultaneously solve for the path parameters Qo, . Once the stable values for both borehole site response and path parameters are obtained, we invert the borehole data for all 19 events to find Mo and fc (Table 2). Having the source and path parameters for all 19 events, we use Equation 1 to predict the spectrum at all surface stations for all the events. The difference between the predicted spectrum -4- and the observed spectrum is the surface site response |Site (f) |. We average the results from the 19 events to determine the final estimate of the site response at each surface station. Results Source and Path parameters In Figure 3a, we compare seismic moment for the deep events found by our inversion between our results and those obtained by NIED based on the teleseismic data (Fukuyama et al., 1998). We also show the values of seismic moment and corner frequency for each event in Table 2. The two estimates of seismic moment are generally within a factor of two. In Figure 3b, we plot seismic moment versus corner frequency for 19 events. The three lines correspond to the Brune stress drops of 1 MPa, 10 MPa and 100 MPa, respectively. Overall, seismic moment scales with the inverse corner frequency cubed, indicating a constant stress drop about 10 MPa. Overall, the stress drop varies by a factor 10, which is similar to the results produced by other studies (e.g., Hanks, 1978; Archuleta, et al., 1982). Our results for the quality factor; Q( f ) 107 f 0.52 is plotted in Figure 3c, along with quality factors obtained by others for the Kanto area (Yamanaka et al., 1998; Kinoshita and Ohike, 2002; Kawakami et al., 2005). Even though our study deals with the larger area with broad hypocentral distance ranges, our average attenuation values for the Kanto area agree in general with the other studies. Because we assume the path effect (Q) is common to each event and each site, the derived attenuation parameters are the averaged value for the whole Kanto area. As Kato (2005) pointed out, if the data set has stations with a broad range of hypocentral distances, the effects of attenuation could be different across the array. Because the hypocentral distances to the stations at northern area are large, the high attenuation (larger Q) values may be expected. However, this area is also located close to the volcanic area that is expected to have lower Q values. Thus, the more attention is necessary when ground motion has been predicted incorporating Q values for the northern area. Site response To interpret the spatial variation of the site response, we first contoured the average site responses for three frequency ranges: 0.5–1.0 Hz (a), 1.0-3.0 Hz (b), 3.0-10.0 Hz (c) in Figure 5. While the averaged site response values show huge variations even for low frequency range 0.5–1.0 Hz, there seem to have some trends of spatial distribution of site response. For example, the area in the northern part of Tokyo, which recorded high seismic intensity values by the Kanto earthquakes (Koketsu and Miyake, 2005), shows noticeably large site response values for 0.5–1.0 Hz. Furthermore, southwestern area (west Yokohama) with large site response values correlates with the area also heavily damage from the 1923 Kanto earthquake (Dan et al., 2000). These results indicate that understanding the characteristics of spatial distribution of site response is useful to consider the potential damage from the future hazardous events. In the following section, we will discuss the relationship between the averaged site response values and the possible quantitative geophysical and qualitative geological parameters (AVS30, depth to the basin, and category of the surface geology) for the possibilities to explain the trend of spatial distribution of site responses. Before moving on to the discussion about the relationships of site response values and some -5- parameters, we here have tried to validate the resultant site response values. A recent and extensive reflection, refraction, and gravity investigation, the Dai-Dai Toku geophysical survey, examined structure in the Kanto basin (Sato et al., 2005; Tanaka et al., 2005). Tanaka et al. (2005) developed a velocity structure by incorporating new data obtained by the Dai-Dai Toku project and the result is shown in Figure 6. Using three layers (Shimousa, Kazusa, Miura) to represent sediments overlying a basement layer (Table 4), we have tried to calculate theoretical 1D-transfer functions based on data from 20 KiK-net stations located inside the area (Figure 6). By using the velocity data for these KiK-net stations, we calculated 1D theoretical transfer functions. In Figure 7a, the theoretical transfer functions and the derived site responses on KiK-net surface station are shown. The theoretical transfer functions agree fairly well with the derived responses in the low frequency range (0.5–1.0 Hz) for many stations. However, the derived site responses for frequencies greater than 1.0 Hz range are larger than the theoretical estimates of site response. This difference may come from the incorporation of frequency-dependent Q in the theoretical estimates (Uetake and Kudo, 2005) or other complex effects, such as lenses or dipping subsurface topography are missing in the plane layer approximation used to compute the theoretical estimates. The comparison shows that the amplification agrees in the low frequency range. Because some boreholes seismographs are situated on very stiff material (shear wave velocity ≥ 3000 m/s) for these KiK-net stations, we can also compare the derived site responses with the observed (borehole-surface) spectral ratio as another validation (Figure 7b). For these borehole-surface station pairs, the derived (surface) site response compares well with the observed spectral ratio over a broad frequency range. As already mentioned, most borehole accelerometers are deployed at depths where the sensor is located within a very stiff layer that can be used as an approximation to the seismological basement. This accounts for the better correlation between spectral ratio estimates and the site response estimates based on the inversion results. Discussion For the Kanto area, geotechnical and geomophological data are complied by Wakamatsu and Matsuoka (2005). In this section, we discuss the trend of spatial variation of site response based on those data. First, we show the map of the surface geology (Figure 7a). This classification is based on the GIS data of 250m-mesh of the surface (Wakamatsu and Matsuoka, 2005). Originally Wakamatsu and Matsuoka (2005) classified surface geology into 25 groups based on the geomorphologic data (Table 4). However, the number of group (25) looks too many to make use of this information for estimation of spatial variation of site response, we coalesced their data into 9 groups (Table 4). The new groups are: Group1: Mountain Range Group2: Volcanic Range Group3: Plateau Group4: Lowland Group5: Swampy Area Group6: Sandy Beach Group7: Sandy Area Group8: Reclaimed Land Group9: Coast Line (River Bed) -6- A better correlation based on the detail clustering between site response values and the category of surface geology is usually not expected (Rogers et al., 1985). However, the sites having high response values for low frequency range (Figure 4a) correlate very well with surface geology such as swampy areas or sediment areas near rivers. The surface geology is useful to understand the gross feature of the spatial distribution of site responses, even though it is only a qualitative estimation. Next we show a map of the average shear wave velocities in the upper 30m (AVS30) (Figure 7b). Compared to the contour map of site response (Figure 4), sites having high response values correlate with basins of significant sediment depth and with small AVS30 values in the frequency range 0.5–1.0 Hz. This spatial interpretation indicates that geophysical parameters (such as AVS30) can be also used to get rough estimation of site response for low frequency range. We plotted the averaged site response as a function of AVS30 in Figure 7c. Apparently, the averaged site response for the low frequency range shows a negative correlation with AVS30 (The correlation coefficient: γ is -0.63); a functional form of least square fitting is as follows; log( Site ( 0.51.0 Hz) ) 0.977 log( AVS30) 2.97 1.6 (3) The middle and high frequency distributions appear to be randomly related to AVS30 and with many large site response values. Almost all stations show site response values being larger than 1.0—most surface stations are amplified. The large site response values in the high frequency range may come from the effects of very thin weathered layers. This is sometimes reported by some recent earthquakes, such as 2003 Miyagi-oki earthquake and 2003 Northern-Miyagi earthquake sequences (Tsuda et al., 2006b). Finally we compared the site response distribution with the basin depth determined by Tanaka et al. (2005b). We show the depth to the Kazusa-layer (Figure 8a) and the Miura-layer (Figure 8b) in addition to the basement (Figure 8c). The area around Yokohama (KiK-net, KNGH10 station, Figure 5) with deep sediment layer (Miura) shows large site response values for both low and middle (1Hz-5Hz) frequency ranges. The depth to the seismological basement is also large around this area (Figure 8c). The area with very soft material (low AVS30 and swampy surface geology) around middle Kanto area (northern part of Tokyo-Bay) corresponds to the area of thick sediment layers. Conclusions In this study we have used a nonlinear inversion method to solve for both source and path parameters. The trend of our attenuation parameters represented by Q(f) is similar to previous studies. Seismic moments agree well with values from NIED and scale with corner frequency f c3 . The site response values are supported by the correlation of the 1D theoretical transfer functions and observed spectral amplitude ratio between borehole to the surface with derived site response for low frequency ranges. The average site response values are in agreement with depth to the seismological basement and AVS30 in low frequency range 0.5–1.0 Hz. These results indicate that geophysical parameters, such as AVS30 and depth to the seismological basement are useful to estimate spatial variation of site response, especially for low frequencies. The areas that show large site response (in the low frequency range) coincide with swamps or areas of soft soil. -7- Because of the large population and many urban facilities in the Kanto area, a huge amount of the physical damage as well as loss of life and injured is expected from future large earthquakes. In order to mitigate the damage from these earthquakes, the prediction of ground motion for broad frequency range (Kamae et al., 1998; Liu et al., 2006) is important. The results of site response can be applicable to the ground motion prediction for future large events based on the combination with source and path modeling (Tsuda, 2007). Thus, the accumulation of observed data recorded on this array is very important for the better estimation of site response. Acknowledgements We are indebted to SK-net for allowing us access to this unique data set. This study is supported by Dai-Dai toku project, supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. We also appreciate the data provided by Drs. M. Matsuoka and K. Wakamatsu at NIED, and Mr. Y. Tanaka at ERI, University of Tokyo. The comments by Drs K Wakamatsu and H. Miyake were useful. We also appreciated the comments by Prof. Archuleta and Dr Steidl at UCSB and help for improving the English of this manuscript. The comments by Dr. Cassidy, anonymous reviewer and Editor Prof. Kawase were useful to develop the manuscript. Reference Archuleta, R. J., E. Cranswick, C. Mueller, and P. Spudich (1982). Source parameters of the 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California, earthquake sequence, J. Geophys. Res, 87, 4595-4606. Beresnev, I.A. (2002). Nonlinearity at California generic soil sites from modeling recent strong-motion data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 92, 863-870. Boatwright, J. (1978). Detailed spectral analysis of two small New York State earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 68, 1117-1131. Bonilla, L.F., J. H. Steidl, G. T. Lindley, A. G. Tumarkin, and R. J. Archuleta (1997). Site amplification in the San Fernando valley, California: variability of site-effect estimation using the S-wave, coda, and H/V methods, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 87, 710-730. Boore, D. M., and J. Boatwright. (1984). Average body-wave radiation coefficient, Bull .Seism. Soc. Am. 74, 1615-1621. Borcherdt, R.D. (1970). Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 60, 29-61. Brune, J. N. (1970). Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res, 75, 4997-5009. Dan, K., M. Watanabe, T. Sato, J. Miyakoshi, and T. Satoh. (2000) Isoseismal map of strong motions for the 1923 Kanto earthquake (MJMA 7.9) by stochastic Green’s function method, J.Struct.Cnstr. Eng., AIJ, 530, 53-62. (Japanese with English abstract) Emergency Management Office, city of Yokohama (2004), The potential map for liquefaction, (http://www.city.yokohama.jp/me/anzen/kikikanri/ekijouka_map/) (in Japanese) Field, E.H., and the SCEC Phase III Working Group (2000) Accounting for site effects in probabilistic seismic hazard analyses of Southern California: Overview of the SCEC Phase III Report, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 90, S1-S32. Furumura, T., and K. Koketsu. (1998) Specific distribution of ground motion during the 1995 Kobe earthquake and its generation mechanism, Geophys. Res. Lett, 25, 785-788. -8- Furumura, T. (2004). Damaging earthquake in Japan and simulation of strong ground motion, http://www.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/furumura/index.html. (In Japanese) Fukuyama, E., M. Ishida, D. S. Dreger, and H. Kawai (1998). Automated seismic moment tensor determination by using on-line broadband seismic waveforms, Zishin. 51, 149-156. (Japanese with English abstract) Hanks, T.C. (1978). Earthquake stress drops, ambient tectonic stresses and stresses that drive plate motions, Pure and Appl. Geophys., 115, 441-458. Hanks, T.C. (1982). f max , Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 71, 1867-1879. Hartzell, S., E. Cranswick, A. Frankel, D. Carver, and M. Meremonte. (1997). Variability of site response in the Los Angels urban area, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 8, 1377-1400. Ishida, M. (1992). Geometry and relative motion of the Philippine Sea Plate and Pacific Plate beneath the Kanto-Tokai district, Japan, J. Geophys. Res, 97, 489-513. Iwata, T., and K. Irikura. (1988). Source parameters of the 1983 Japan Sea earthquake sequence, J. Phys. Earth. 36, 155-184. Kato, K. (2005). Subsurface structure and seismic motion, Chapter 6 (pp 180-193), Maruzen, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese). Kawakami, Y, A. Kaneda, and Y. Hisada. (2005). Site amplification factors on the Kanto Plain with consideration to frequency-dependence. Report on the Seismic Kanto network (SK-net). (in Japanese) Kawase, H. (2005) Subsurface Structure and Seismic Motion, Chapter 7.2 (pp232-267), Maruzen, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese). Kawase, H. (1996). The cause of the damage belt in Kobe: the basin edge effects, constructive interference of the direct S-wave with the basin-induced diffracted/Rayleigh waves, Seism. Res. Lett. 67, 25-34. Kinoshita, S. (1992). Local characteristics of the f max of bedrock motion in the Tokyo metropolitan area, Japan, J. Phys. Earth. 40, 487-515. Kinoshita, S., and M. Ohike (2002). Scaling relations of earthquakes that occurred in the upper part of the Philippine Sea plate beneath the Kanto region, Japan, estimated by means of borehole recordings, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 611-624. Kobayashi, R., and K. Koketsu (2005). Source process of the 1923 Kanto earthquake inferred from historical geodetic, teleseismic, and strong motion data, Earth Planets Space, 57, 261-270. Koketsu, K. and H. Miyake (2005). Source mechanism of the 2005 North-Eastern Chiba earthquake, http://taro.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/saigai/chiba/index.html (in Japanese). Matsuoka, M., and K. Wakamatsu. (2005). Vs30 mapping using 7.5-arc-second Japan engineering geomorphologic classification map, Programme and abstracts, Seismological Society of Japan, Fall meeting (in Japanese). Moya, A., J. Aguirre, and K. Irikura (2000). Inversion of source parameters and site effects from strong ground motion records using genetic algorithms, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90, 977-992. -9- Moya, A. and K. Irikura (2003). Estimation of site effects and Q factors using a reference event, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 1730-1745. Reid, H. F. (1910). The California earthquake of April 18, 1906, Publication 87, V21, Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington, D.C. Rogers, A.M., J. C. Tinseley, R.D. Borcherdt (1985). Predicting relative ground response, Evaluating earthquake hazards in the Los Angeles region- An earth-science perspective, J.I. Ziony (editor), U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper. 1360, 221-247. Sato, H., N. Hirata, K. Koketsu, D. Okaya, S. Abe, R. Kobayashi, M. Matsubara, T. Iwasaki, T. Ito, T. Ikawa, T. Kawanaka, K. Kasahara, and S. Harder. (2005). Earthquake source fault beneath Tokyo, Science. 309, 462-464. Sato, T., R. W. Graves, and P.G. Somerville (1999) Three-dimensional finite-difference simulation of long-period strong motions in the Tokyo metropolitan area during the 1990 Odawara earthquake (Mj 5.1) and the great 1923 Kanto earthquake (Ms 8.2) in Japan, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, 579-607. Sato, T., R. W. Graves, P. G. Somerville, and S. Kataoka. (1998) Estimates of regional and local strong motions during the great 1923 Kanto, Japan, Earthquake (Ms 8.2). Part 2: Forward simulation of seismograms using variable-slip rupture models and estimation of near-fault long-period ground motion, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 88, 206-227. Seismic Kanto Research Project, Earthquake Research Instiutute, University of Tokyo. (2001), http://www.sknet.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ (in Japanese). Sen, K. M. and P. L. Stoffa (1995). Global Optimization Methods in Geophysical Inversion, Elsevier, New York. Takemura, M. (2003). The Great Kanto Earthquake, Kajima-Publishing, Tokyo. Tanaka, Y., K.Koketsu, H. Miyake, T. Furumura, H. Sato, N. Hirata, H. Suzuki, and T. Masuda (2005a). The Daidaitoku community model of the velocity structure beneath the Tokyo metropolitan area (1), Programme and abstracts, Joint meeting for Earth and Planetary Science. Tanaka, Y., Y. Ikegami, R. Kobayashi, H. Miyake, and K. Koketsu. (2005b). Strong motion validation in the Tokyo metropolitan area: ground motion simulation of the 1923 Kanto earthquakes, Programme and abstracts, Seismological Society of Japan, Fall meeting (in Japanese). Tsuda, K. (2007) A new method of site response estimation and its application to ground motion prediction, Ph.D thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 199pp. Tsuda, K., Archuleta, R., and Koketsu, K. (2006a). Quantifying spatial distribution of site response by use of the Yokohama High-Density Strong Motion Network, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, 926-942. Tsuda, K., Archuleta, R., and Koketsu, K. (2006b). Quantifying spatial distribution of site response by use of the Yokohama High-Density Strong Motion Network, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, 926-942. Uchiyama, Y., and S. Midorikawa (2003). Practical method to evaluate response spectra of bedrock motions using amplification factors for site classes, Journal of Struct Constr.Engng. , 582 , 39- 10 - Uetake, T., and K. Kudo. (2005). Assessment of site effects on seismic motion in Ashigara Valley, Japan, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 95. 2297-2317. Yamanaka, Y., and N. Yamada. (2002). Estimation of the 3D S-wave velocity model of deep sedimentary layers in Kanto plain, Japan, using microtremor array measurements, Butsuri-Tansa, 55, 53-65. ( in Japanese with English abstract). Yamanaka, H., A. Nakamaru., K. Kurita., and K. Seo. (1998). Evaluation of site effects by an inversion of S-wave spectra with a constraint condition considering effects of shallow weathered layers, Zisin 51,193-202 (in Japanese with English abstract). Wakamatsu, K., and M. Matsuoka. (2005). Development of the 7.5-arc-second engineering geomorphologic classification database, Inter. Workshop on Strong Ground Motion Prediction and Earthquake Tectonics in Urban Areas, pp.123-126. 1. K. Tsuda, Department of Earth Science and Institute for Crustal Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-1100, U.S.A kenichi@crustal.ucsb.edu Current Address: Shimizu Corporation, 3-4-17, Ethujima, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8530, Japan 2. Y. Hisada, Kogakuin University, Shinjuku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan. 3. K Koketsu, Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. Figure Caption Figure 1: Plate geometry surrounding Japanese arc-Islands (after Ishida, 1992). The red and black numbers correspond to the depth of subducting the Philippine Sea Plate and the Pacific Plate, respectively. Figure 2: Geography of the Kanto region. Epicenters of the events listed in the Table 2 are plotted in map view by solid circles. Solid triangles colored by blue denote the reference station used to determined source and path parameters. Open square means the surface station used in this study. Figure 3: Source and path parameters obtained by inversion. (a) Seismic moments from this study are compared with those from NIED which uses three stations in a regional broadband network. Solid circles correspond to the deep events, and open circles—shallow events. Dashed lines show a factor of two. (b) Seismic moment is plotted versus corner frequency for the 19 events. Lines of constant stress drops (Brune) are plotted. Within a factor of two the stress drops are ~10 MPa. (c) Comparison of Q 1 including our model of Q( f ) 107 f 0.52 .We also plotted other Q model obtained by data in Kanto area (Yamanaka et al., 1998; Kinoshita and Ohike, 2002; Kawakami et al., 2005) Figure 4: The contour map site responses are averaged for over frequency bands of 0.5 -1.0 Hz (a), 1.0-5.0 Hz (b) and 5.0 - 10 Hz (c). - 11 - Figure 5: Velocity structure around Kanto area determined by Tanaka et al. (2005b). Each contour line corresponds to the elevation of seismological basement (Vs=3.0 km/s). Figure 6: (a) Comparison of site response by 1D transfer function based on four-layered model (red) and with derived surface site response (blue lines, average ± 1 σ) at KiK-net stations located inside Fig 6. (b) The observed spectrum amplitude ratio between the borehole to the surface is also shown by black traces (average ± 1 σ). Figure 7: (a) The map of surface geology classified for each 250 m mesh (originally based on Wakamatsu and Matsuoka, 2005). The area with purple corresponds to the reclaimed land; green is swamp area and brown is mountainous area. (b) The map of averaged shear wave velocities for upper 30m (AVS30) for each 250 m mesh (Wakamatsu and Matsuoka, 2005). Averaged site response for over frequency bands of 0.5 -1.0 Hz (c1), 1.0-5.0 Hz (c2) and 5.0 - 10 Hz (c3) as a function of averaged shear wave velocities for upper 30m(AVS30) (Wakamatsu and Matsuoka, 2005). The solid line in (c1) corresponds to the least square fittings. Figure 8: The contour map of the sediment layers to (a) Miura-layer (Vs = 900 [m/sec]), (b) Kazusa-layer (Vs = 1500 [m/sec]), and (c) Seismological basement (Vs = 3000 [m/sec]), respectively. All the depths are determined by Tanaka et al. (2005b). - 12 - Network (NIED) K-NET (NIED) KiK-net ERI ERI (Basement) Gunma Pref Tochigi Pref Ibaraki Pref. Saitama Pref Number of Stations 135 61 25 3 59 47 79 92 Chiba Pref. Tokyo Metropolitan Office Tokyo Fire Department Kanagawa Pref Yokohama City Yokohama (Borehole) Number of Stations 74 42 40 37 150 8 Total 852 Network Table1: Number of stations deployed by local government and institutions collected by SK-net. Event Lat.† (N) Long. † (E) Depth† (km) MW Moment† [Nm] Moment§ [Nm] fc§ [Hz] 1 3/13/03 36.09 139.87 50 4.9 2.34E+16 2.41E+16 1.95 2 4/8/2003 36.07 139.91 44 4.8 2.11E+16 1.58E+16 1.69 3 5/10/2003 35.81 140.11 65 4.7 1.37E+16 2.00E+16 1.41 4 5/12/2003 35.87 140.09 50 5.2 7.07E+16 3.87E+16 1.28 5 5/17/03 35.74 140.7 53 5.3 1.13E+17 1.03E+17 0.71 6 8/18/03 35.8 140.11 71 4.8 1.92E+16 2.55E+16 1.55 7 9/20/03 35.22 140.3 56 5.7 3.53E+17 2.22E+17 0.89 8 10/15/03 35.61 140.05 68 5.1 5.15E+16 5.32E+16 1.60 9 7/10/04 36.08 139.89 50 4.7 1.21E+16 1.34E+16 2.10 10 7/17/04 34.83 140.36 59 5.6 2.39E+17 1.40E+17 1.34 11 8/6/04 35.61 140.06 71 4.7 1.27E+16 1.92E+16 1.98 12 10/6/04 35.99 140.09 65 5.7 4.52E+17 2.80E+17 0.78 13 2/8/05 36.14 140.09 65 4.9 2.20E+16 1.88E+16 2.11 14 2/16/05 36.04 139.9 53 5.4 1.33E+17 7.44E+16 1.52 15 4/10/05 35.73 140.62 50 5.8 4.95E+17 5.52E+17 0.42 16 6/20/05 35.73 140.69 51 5.5 1.94E+17 1.26E+17 0.81 17 7/23/05 35.58 140.14 73 4.7 4.74E+17 4.64E+17 0.84 18 7/28/05 36.13 139.85 51 4.7 1.17E+16 9.58E+15 3.00 19 8/7/05 35.56 140.11 73 4.5 6.88E+15 1.30E+16 2.35 †These parameters were determined by National Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED), Tsukuba, Japan. § Resultant parameters Table 2: List of the earthquakes used in this study. The 'lat' and 'lon' are the northern latitude and eastern longitude of an earthquake epicenter, respectively. Mo and fc denote the resultant seismic moments and corner frequencies obtained by our inversion: Mo (NIED) are those determined by NIED with the centroid moment tensor inversion. - 13 - Layer No. 1 2 3 4 Vs [m/s] 450 900 1500 3000 Density [kg/m³] 1.85 2.4 3.2 3.3 Q 30 50 80 150 Table 3: Velocity model used to calculate synthetic transfer functions (Sato et al., 1998, 1999: Tanaka et al., 2005b). Grouping by this study Grouping by Wakamatsu and Matsuoka (2005) Mountain Range Volcanic Range Plateau Mountain, Mountain footslope, Hill Volcano, Volcnic footslope, Volcanic hill Rocky strath terrace, Gravely terrace, Terrace covered with volcanic ash soil Valley bottom lowland, Alluvium fan, Natural levee Back marsh, Abandoned river channels Delta and coastal lowland, Marine sand and gravel bars Sand dune, Lowland between coastal dunes and /or bars Reclaimed land, Filled land Rocky shore, Rock reef, Dry riverbed, Riverbed Lowland Swampy Area Sandy Beach Sandy Area Reclaimed Land Coast Line (River bed) Table 4: Geological classification by Wakamatsu and Matsuoka (2005) - 14 - Figure 1: - 15 - Figure 2: - 16 - Figure 3: - 17 - Figure 4 - 18 - Figure 5 - 19 - Figure 6 - 20 - Figure 6 (Continued) - 21 - Figure 7 - 22 - Figure 8: - 23 -