How science works yearly learning objectives 1 How science works Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Extension 1.1 Explanations, argument and decisions 1.1a1 Scientific thinking: developing explanations using ideas and models use an existing describe more describe the justify the selection of evaluate the model or analogy to than one model to strengths and a particular model as the effectiveness of using possible to have and to explain a phenomenon explain the same weaknesses of a most appropriate models and analogies use different, and phenomenon and range of available in their explanations sometimes conflicting, discuss the strengths models and select the and weaknesses of most appropriate recognise and explain the value of using models and analogies to clarify explanations each model devise own simple models or analogies to explain observations, data strengths and or scientific ideas evaluate the recognise that models in their explanation weaknesses of their manipulation of a own models and devising and using use of a particular model or analogy analogies alternative models model or analogy might be needed to could help to make a supports an clarify an explanation ‘creative leap’ in an explain how the explain why the explanation 1.1a2 Scientific thinking: developing explanations – challenge and limitations recognise that it is describe how explain how explanation explain how bias, identify the limitations explain the explain and justify different explanations bias, a lack of a lack of evidence or of a range of scientific acceptance or the acceptance or can arise from individual evidence or misconceptions can explanations rejection of an rejection of an bias misconceptions can give rise to different explanation based on explanation based on give rise to different explanations an understanding of an understanding of the limitations the limitations recognise that not everything can be explanations explain why identify some questions that the scientific process cannot completely explained by the there are some answer but can contribute scientific process questions that the questions that the to questions that the scientific proof is only scientific process scientific process scientific process ever provisional cannot answer cannot answer cannot completely identify some identify some answer but can contribute to and explain the reasons for those limitations explain why How science works yearly learning objectives 1 How science works Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Extension 1.1a3 Scientific thinking: developing argument identify a range of identify a range use criteria to explain how the use devise criteria to devise criteria to scientific data and other of scientific data and select relevant of criteria improves the select relevant select relevant scientific evidence to back an other evidence to scientific data and effectiveness of selecting scientific data and data and other sources argument and the back an argument other sources of scientific data and other other sources of of evidence to support counterclaim in less and the counterclaim evidence to support sources of evidence to evidence to support or negate an argument complex and/or familiar in more complex or negate an support or negate an or negate an in less familiar contexts contexts, e.g. and/or less familiar argument argument argument in familiar establishing a wind farm contexts e.g. use of contexts antibiotics 1.1b Applications, implications and cultural understanding describe some explain some evaluate the evaluate the relevant describe and evaluate and benefits and drawbacks issues, benefits and issues, benefits and issues, benefits and evaluate examples of analyse the potential of scientific drawbacks of drawbacks of drawbacks of scientific perceived and actual impact of the developments with scientific scientific developments with which risk arising from the application of new which they are familiar developments with developments with they are familiar and draw application of scientific and which they are which they are conclusions about which scientific or technological familiar familiar would be more appropriate technological developments recognise that decisions about the use and application of science and technology scientists, individuals different decisions on scientific evidence can be are made by society and and society have to the use and shaped by bias, scientific power and limitations be shaped by bias, individuals and can have consider the balance application of status, political or of science in scientific status, an impact on the way of cultural, social and scientific and economic factors, and how addressing a range of political or economic people think and behave ethical advantages technological this could influence the moral or ethical factors, and how this and disadvantages developments may be decisions taken on the issues, and how this could influence the when making made in different application of scientific and could influence the impact of decisions decisions, and how economic, cultural technological impact of decisions taken on the these could affect and social contexts developments taken on the application of scientific people and the application of and technological environment scientific and developments recognise that recognise that developments recognise that describe the technological developments explain how scientific evidence can How science works yearly learning objectives 1 How science works Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Extension 1.1c Communication for audience and with purpose use key scientific vocabulary and terminology in discussions and written work identify and use the conventions of various genres for different audiences and purposes in scientific writing use a range of scientific vocabulary and terminology consistently in discussions and written work adapt the stylistic conventions of a range of genres for different audiences and purposes in scientific writing communicate effectively and use appropriate scientific terminology and conventions in discussion and written work adapt the stylistic conventions of a wider range of genres for different audiences and purposes in scientific writing communicate effectively using a wide range of scientific terminology and conventions in discussion and written work use simple criteria to judge the appropriateness of a piece of scientific writing for a particular audience communicate qualitative and quantitative evidence effectively using scientific terminology and conventions, drawing on abstract ideas and models as appropriate to the audience and purpose devise criteria to judge the appropriateness of a piece of scientific writing for a particular audience use a wide range of technical vocabulary and techniques with fluency, demonstrating communication and numerical skills as appropriate for a range of audiences and purposes critically evaluate criteria used to judge the appropriateness of a piece of scientific writing for a particular audience How science works yearly learning objectives 1.2 Practical and enquiry skills Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Extension 1.2a Planning an approach describe an describe an explain how the explain how to explain how the explain why different appropriate approach to appropriate approach planned approach to plan appropriate planned approach to approaches are required to answer a scientific to answer a scientific answer a scientific approaches to answer a scientific question investigate different kinds question using a limited question using question was investigatory work by was informed by a range of of scientific questions and range of information and sources of evidence informed by scientific synthesising scientific knowledge, how scientific knowledge, making relevant and, where knowledge, information from a understanding and sources understanding and sources observations or appropriate, making understanding or range of sources in of evidence and, where of evidence are used in the measurements relevant observations other sources of complex contexts and appropriate, how this different approaches or measurements evidence where variables are influenced the method of less easily controlled data collection, including using appropriate apparatus the choice of apparatus, range and values of variables 1.2b Selecting and managing variables recognise the range describe and use and apply identify key use and apply key use and apply of variables involved in identify key variables independent and factors in complex variables in complex multiple variables in an investigation and in an investigation dependent variables contexts where contexts, including ones in complex contexts decide which to control and assign in an investigation by variables are less which variables are less appropriate values to choosing an easily controlled easily controlled these appropriate range, number and value for each one 1.2c Assessing risk and working safely explain how action explain how to explain how use and apply explain why their explain how hazards has been taken to take action to control approaches to risk assessment in approach to practical work are identified and risks control obvious risk and the risks to practical work were carrying out practical needed to be adapted to managed to collect data in how methods are themselves and adapted to control procedures control risk a safe and skilful manner adequate for the task others and risk demonstrate competence in their practical techniques How science works yearly learning objectives 1.2 Practical and enquiry skills Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Extension 1.2d Obtaining and presenting primary evidence describe and explain how the use and apply explain how use and apply systematic use and apply systematic record observations observation and qualitative and inherent variation, observation and precise observation and precise and evidence recording methods quantitative e.g. from human measuring with a range of measuring with a range of systematically are appropriate to the methods to obtain error, sensitivity and apparatus, whilst taking account apparatus, whilst taking account task and record accuracy of of inherent variation, to obtain of inherent variation, to obtain sufficient data instrument, needs to and record reliable data and record reliable data in a systematically be considered when recognise that the presentation of experimental which the results through the presentation of routine use of experimental results the presentation of tables, bar charts through the routine experimental appropriate ways of and simple graphs use of tables, charts results through the recording relevant makes it easier to and line graphs routine use of observations and see patterns and makes it easier to see tables, charts and comparisons, clearly trends patterns and trends line graphs makes identifying points of it easier to see particular significance describe ways in explain how collecting data apply and use explain how the chosen more demanding context presentation of data has been used to support a valid presentation of data takes conclusion account of uncertainty or explain how the chosen alternative conclusions patterns and trends 1.2e Critical interpretation and evaluation of primary evidence describe explain patterns explain how explain how the synthesise and manipulate synthesise and manipulate patterns and trends and trends in results the evidence from numerical data have data, analyse findings and draw data, analyse findings, draw in results and link and how this supports the results links to been manipulated to valid and reliable conclusions valid and reliable conclusions this evidence to or negates any the conclusions make valid consistent with the evidence consistent with the evidence, any prediction prediction made drawn and whether comparisons and and linked to the original and explain how strongly the it is sufficient conclusions linked to scientific question evidence relates to the original made describe and suggest how planning and implementation could be improved describe and the original scientific suggest, with reasons, how improvements to planning and the planning and implementation could implementation planning and be improved would have led to implementation, and the collection of explain how this could more valid and account for errors and reliable evidence anomalies and how and a more secure inadequacies could be explain how question evaluate the recognise that correlation does not always imply causation evaluate the planning and scientific question explain why correlation does not always imply causation implementation, and explain how this could account for implementation, and explain errors and anomalies and the how this could account for subsequent impact on the errors and anomalies and the conclusion in simple contexts subsequent impact on the evaluate the planning and conclusion in more complex How science works yearly learning objectives conclusion remedied contexts 1.2 Practical and enquiry skills Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Extension 1.2f Critical interpretation and evaluation of secondary evidence link the explain why the explain why explain, using evaluate the conclusions evaluate the conclusions secondary evidence secondary evidence is the secondary scientific knowledge drawn by others, including drawn by others, including presented to the sufficient or evidence is and understanding, scientists, in familiar or less scientists, in less familiar or prediction or insufficient to support sufficient or how some of the complex contexts and consider more complex contexts, and conclusion drawn the conclusion or insufficient to limitations in the how strongly the evidence consider how strongly the interpretation made support the secondary evidence supports these conclusions or evidence supports these conclusion or can distort the claims conclusions or claims interpretation made conclusion drawn describe patterns and trends in secondary data the selection, ordering recognise that or rejection of secondary data could and any implications arising recognise that scientific lead to different conclusions secondary arise from different numerical data has interpretations of the been manipulated same evidence explain how to support a particular conclusion or viewpoint controversies can describe a range of issues explain how scientific that can affect the credibility of controversies can arise from data different ways of interpreting evidence