AnnualProgressReport2002Appendices

advertisement
Appendix A - Current Members of the Moray Firth cSAC Management Group
Michael Comerford (Chair)
Maritime and Coastguard Agency
Colin Craig
Scottish Environment Protection Agency
George Dobbie
Cromarty Firth Port Authority
John Grierson
Northern Constabulary
Fiona Simpson
The Crown Estate
Ben Leyshon
Scottish Natural Heritage
Jim McKie
Fisheries Research Services, Marine Lab Aberdeen
Murdo McLeod
Inverness Harbour Trust
David Simmons
Department of Trade and Industry
Alex Stewart
Scottish Water
Mike Deeming
Maritime and Coastguard Agency
Martin Wanless
The Moray Council
Paul Thompson (Scientific Advisor)
University of Aberdeen
David Reynolds
Ministry of Defence
Colin Wishart
The Highland Council
Appendix B - Management Scheme - Implementation 2002
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
Rate of
implementation
Agricultural and Forestry Run-off
D1.1.1
List and review toxicity to SEPA
dolphins, and elements of
their food chain, of
commonly used chemicals
-The Moray Firth EU Life Environment
project commissioned a review entitled
“The impact of environmental
contaminants on bottlenose dolphins
and make
recommendations as to
their use and disposal.
(Tursiops truncatus) and other proxy
species: A summary of information”.
This is a reference document and first
point of information to aid the relevant
authorities in decision-making processes
relating the use or discharge of potential
contaminants. SEPA has been involved
with the production of this report.
- Series of SEPA leaflets on best
practice and legislation on the use and
disposal of pesticides, insecticides.
- Disposal of waste
pesticides/insecticides on the ground is
regulated by SEPA. SEPA takes into
consideration the dolphins when issuing
licences adopting the precautionary
principle.
- SEPA is consulted on any application
for spread of pesticides/ insecticides
by airplane only.
S - July 2001
C - April 2002
Full
Desired Effect?
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D1.1.2
D1.1.3
Encourage adoption and
application of Good
Practice Guidelines and
ensure that they
adequately address the
marine issues
SEPA
Monitor the input from
SEPA
rivers of pollutants
including pesticides that
discharge into the Moray
Firth. And monitor
designated shellfish waters
for the presence of
pesticides.
- Series of SEPA leaflets on best
practice and legislation on the use and
disposal of pesticides, insecticides and
fertilisers.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Full
- The NE Rivers Project is joint initiative
involving AC, SEPA, SNH.
Supports/advices landowners on
enhancing riparian strips and creating
buffer zones to improve water quality,
reducing erosion. Should benefit dolphins
by reducing diffuse pollution to sea
SEPA – Monitors bottom of main rivers
(Conon, Beauly) on a monthly basis for
pollutant inc pesticides. Monitors
boreholes for pesticides. Mussels in the
MF are monitored for the presence of
PCBs. Designated shellfish waters are
monitored for the presence of pesticides
(Dornoch Firth, Cromarty Firth).
Full
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D1.1.4
Ensure that water courses SEPA
which are at risk from
sheep dip pollution are
monitored
SEPA - Discharge of sheep dip not
allowed into rivers. Monthly monitor at
bottom of rivers - Dangerous Substances
Directive.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Substantive
- SEPA has urged farmers and mobile
dipping contractors to take great care in
the use and disposal of sheep dip.
Failure to do so can result in devastating
effects on the aquatic environment, and
the possibility of enforcement action
being taken against those causing
pollution.
D1.2.1
Review existing data on
nutrient levels and if
necessary encourage
organisations to gather
more data. If problem
areas exist, introduce
measures to reduce
enrichment, through the
NVZ initiative.
SEERAD
Under the “Designation of Nitrate
Vulnerable Zones (Scotland) Regulations
2002” the Moray Coast has been
designated as a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone
(NVZ) where mandatory Action
Programmes for farmers must be
established. These promote best practice
in the use and storage of fertiliser and
manure. Certain areas (e.g. the Black
Isle) were targeted for further data
collection on the presence of nitrates but
no case found for designating as NVZs.
The relevant authorities will work with
farmers in these areas to ensure that
good practice is adhered to and that
voluntary preventative measures are put
in place, where appropriate.
The Scottish Executive’s Agriculture and
Environment Working Group Report
“Custodians of Change” supports a
number of key approaches to
environmental management and the
development of sustainable agriculture in
Scotland.
Substantive
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Anti-fouling: use of
D3.1.1
Raise awareness regarding SEPA
the use and effects of
anti-fouling coatings and
SEERAD
their potential impact on
(To be confirmed)
dolphins and the wider
marine environment.
Recommend alternative
non-toxic methods to
potential users. Carry out
regular biological
monitoring for the effects of
TBT.
SEPA monitors TBT removal (dogwelks
in harbours).Yributytin (TBT) or
triphenyltin (TPT) sampling. SEPA is
currently requesting samples from the
hulls of vessels prior to them being taken
out of the water for maintenance, to
check for traces of tributytin (TBT) or
triphenyltin (TPT), hormone disruptive
compounds. SEPA has advised that it is
likely that if the boats are washed down
prior to painting, the wash waters may
contain pollutants. Under the Control of
Pollution Act 1974, it is an offence to
cause or knowingly permit poisonous,
noxious or polluting matter to enter
controlled waters. SEPA advised that if
washwaters enter the sea from such an
activity it may progress enforcement
action against the individuals involved.
Substantive
D3.1.2
Analyse existing and future SAC
dolphin tissue samples,
and key prey species, for
anti-fouling compound
DEFRA funds, through the cetacean
Stranding Scheme (NHM,IOZ,SAC), the
analysis of 30 animals p/a for pollutants
Organochl - PCB,DDT,Pesticides, etc;
contamination
heavy metals - Hg,Cd, etc;
PoliBrominatedFlameRetardants; and
butylins - TBT, etc ). The contract will
terminate by end of 2003 (started in
2000). Contaminant analyses on the
tissue samples from 12 bottlenose
dolphins (collected over the last 10 years)
will be carried out. The freshest tissues
will be selected and although most of the
tissues will be from Moray Firth dolphins
we will also for interest include samples
from probably two animals from the
West. These tissues will be analysed for
a full range of PCBs and metals and include TBTs.
S-
C - March 2003
Moderate
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Aquaculture
D4.1.1
Encourage the aquaculture SEPA
industry to minimise
chemical treatment and
SQS
medicine use, which are
known to impact on
dolphins or their prey. Take
into consideration the
dolphin interest when
considering discharge
consents.
SEPA - licences discharges.
D4.2.1
Hold discussions with fish CE
farm operators/employees
to raise awareness of
SEPA
current legislation and the
CEC - Discussions with the fish farm
operators are ongoing as part of regular
contact but have not been specifically in
relation to the cSAC (and any practical
impact of feeding
discarded fish to dolphins.
operational restrictions) due to the fact
that the site is fallow.
Full
Proposals to discharge some
substances have been
refused due to the cSAC
designation, in particular due
to the dolphin population.
Full
Yes. It is thought that
SEPA's advice was followed.
Full
The report has helped to
improve our understanding
about the potential impact of
ADD’s on non target species.
Implementation of the
recommendations will have
the desired effect.
C - 2001
SEPA in the past advised the fish farm at
Avoch not to feed the dolphins.
D4.3.1
Review research on the
effect of seal scarers on
cetaceans and other
marine species
SNH
Work commissioned by SNH on the use
of acoustic deterrents on non-target
species. SNH commissioned recognised
specialists in the field of Acoustic
C –Dec 2002
Deterrent Devices to undertake the work.
This was then the subject of a
consultation exercise. The final report will
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
be available by December 2002. It
recommends a precautionary approach in
their use. It is likely that on the back of
the report SNH will advice a presumption
against ADDs in cetacean and seal
cSACs.
D4.3.2
Based on the findings of
CE
3.1.1, manage the use of
seal scarers in the cSAC
LA
and advise on their use. In
the future consider
regulating their use as a
condition of fish farm
leases, reviewing and
amending existing leases
as appropriate. Where
possible, encourage the
use of alternative methods
for deterring seals - e.g.
cage tensioning.
The use of anti-predator devices is not a
specified condition within The CE finfish or
shellfish farming leases, however any
comments that SNH or other bodies offer
with regard to these are normally
incorporated as "advice to applicants".
The CE would not be keen to impose such a
retrospective condition in a lease as it is
not easily monitored by The CE.
Planned
D4.3.3
Consider the deployment SEERAD
of methods of recapture of
escaped salmon,
encourage best practice
among fish farm
owners/operators and
promote their use.
SEERAD issued “What to do in the event
of an escape of fish from a fish farm –
Guidance on The Registration of Fish
farming and Shellfish farming Business
(Amendment) (Scotland) Order 2002” in
May 2002. Methods used for recapture of
escaped fish will necessarily vary,
depending on the location of the farm site
and the local topography, the size of the
fish involved, and implications for other
wildlife (such as wild salmon and other
Full
The site within the cSAC
area has lain fallow for some
time and there are no
immediate plans to
re-activate it. The CE will seek
to have any necessary controls
in place by agreement in
advance of re-stocking.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
fish species, birds and marine
mammals). In many instances the
appropriate recapture method would
involve rapid deployment of gill nets of
appropriate mesh size. It should be noted
that a fish farmer or other person
seeking to recapture or catch escaped
fish might need temporary local
exemption from conservation regulations.
There are two provisions that allow for
this. Advice about this will be provided
following notification of an escape. In
almost all cases, continuing action will
require permission from Scottish
Ministers.
D4.3.4
Ensure that relevant
authorities approach fish
farmers when new
mechanisms of control
come into place and alert
them to potential changes
SAC MG
Planned
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Ballast Water Discharge
D5.1.1
Review the need for
MCA
monitoring of ballast water
discharges
MCA - On going development of IMO
Ballast Water Convention. Led by MCA,
Mike Hunter, HQ. Keep cSAC MG updated
on developments and central policy
towards monitoring, control, blanket ban
or targeted MCA action. Raise
awareness to MCA HQ about the cSAC
management scheme and potential
impacts to dolphins.
Substantive
D5.1.2
Encourage all ships using PA
ports in the cSAC to
adhere to IMO Guidelines MCA
on ballast water discharge
CFPA amended their "General
Directions" to include items about
compliance with IMO guidelines.
Substantive
MCA issued all ships using ports within
cSAC the IMO guidelines - “Compliance
with the Guidelines is not, at present,
legally required but shipping agents and
ship owners are strongly urged to ensure
that vessels discharging ballast in UK
waters comply with the Guidelines to
reduce the spread of disease and
non-indigenous nuisance species that
may be in the water.”
IHT ensures all vessels adhere to IMO
Guidelines
D5.1.3
Take ballast water
samples to investigate
presence of species and
contaminants (if required
from 4.1.1).
To be determined
If necessary from D5.1.1 (in one year it will be known)
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D5.1.4
Investigate the extent of
To be determined
the activity; identify which
vessels use ballast water,
when and where they
discharge and their port of
origin
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
The IHT collects data on ship's ballast
water discharges and their port of origin.
But not on the port where they have put
in ballast. Log books store all
information. Furthermore ships might
have ballast water from different origins in
their tanks.
Boat Traffic
D6.1.1
For boats which regularly LA
enter the Moray Firth
cSAC, encourage the use MCA
of engines and propellers
which minimise noise in
PA
frequencies most likely to
disturb marine mammals.
SNH
In particular encourage the
use of large engines with
low revving propellers and
specify minimum standard
noise levels for wildlife
watching and research
boats.
MCA – raise awareness of cSAC in
DMSC meetings; raise awareness of
cSAC to local vessels and fishing boats
during PSC, FV inspections and
encourage correct use of engines
transiting the area.
Some
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D6.1.2
Encourage regular
maintenance of engines,
propellers and boats.
MCA
PA
MCA – raise awareness of cSAC to local
vessels and fishing boats during PSC,
FV inspections etc and encourage
correct use of engines transiting the area.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Substantive
IHT – Have regular maintenance of all
their vessels
D6.1.3
Raise awareness and
SNH
make recommendations in
relation to the potential
impact of noise, boat
movements, collisions and
marine litter on dolphins,
through information
provision and the media.
SNH- raising awareness about the
impact of boat movements and collisions
on dolphins. This is being achieved in
part through the dolphin disturbance
study which will be completed by March
2002. It is more difficult to raise
awareness about noise as information to
better understand this issue is still being
acquired. Once the impact of marine noise
is better understood then we will promote
best practice to a wider audience through
every day working practice and through
information provision and the media.
The MFP marine litter group is in place
and this can be used as a mechanism
to highlight the impact of litter on dolphins.
Moderate
The disturbance report has
highlighted shortfalls in the
existing legislation and
identified how the reporting
and processing of wildlife
crime (re. dolphin
disturbance) can be
improved. These measures
are being adopted by the
DSP. The DSP continues to
promote good practice re.
boat movements and this will
minimise the potential
disturbance to dolphins from
cruise boats in the area.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D6.1.4
Develop a working
definition of a quiet boat.
SNH
D6.1.5
Set up a working group to MFP
coordinate the monitoring
of shipping / boat
movements and related
noise levels in the cSAC
and prepare maps showing
areas of dolphin activity
which would be used to
help assess the
distribution of impacts and
risk.
D6.1.6
Discourage the use of
SNH
systems with noise
characteristics likely to
JNCC
have a potential impact on
the dolphins. The
assessment of the use of
such systems should be
undertaken on a case-by
case basis
S - 2003
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Planned
Planned
JNCC and SNH are the lead bodies as
part of their role as advisors on the use of
systems with noise characteristics likely
to have a potential impact on the
dolphins. The assessment of the use of
such systems should be undertaken on a
case-by case basis.
Planned
The whole question of noise
and its impacts on dolphins
and marine wildlife still
requires further thought.
Without a better
understanding about the
frequencies and types of
noise that cause the greatest
problem for dolphins it is
difficult to be able to
effectively promote best
practice.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D6.2.1
Review and expand the
SNH Dolphin Awareness
Initiative and seek
experience from other
areas where noise control
SNH
procedures are adopted by
boat users. Raise
awareness locally and
identify examples of
schemes elsewhere
D6.2.2
D6.2.3
D6.2.4
Encourage close liaison
NC
with NC and GP to
investigate incidents
GP
between recreational craft
and dolphins; introduce
specific training for marine
mammal related issues
Establish voluntary
NoSYA
registration of all motorised
boats within the cSAC
MCA
Quantify participants,
To be determined
types, distribution and
seasonal patterns of
motorised water sport
activity in the Firth in order
to target awareness raising
campaigns.
SNH - An interest in reviewing and
developing the DAI code was registered
by users of the Kessock Channel 3-4
years ago. This interested subsided as
use of the channel by recreational craft
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Planned
C - Q1,
2003/2004
dropped off. It might be worthwhile
reviving the DAI in the future by looking at
pilot areas such as the Kessock
Channel.
- Northern Constabulary sit on DSP.
Protocol in place for all incidents to be
assessed by Police to ascertain
any criminality.
- Training for Police officers
still to be arranged.
Work still in progress.
MCA - to assist NoSYA in the
development of the scheme by providing
address database from CG66.
Moderate
Negligible
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D6.2.5
Encourage pre-race
MCA
consultation between race
organisers and relevant
PA
bodies and raise
SNH
SNH have already been in contact with
race organisers in the past. Also, steps
have been taken to include information on
the DSP code on local admiralty charts C - Q4 2002
awareness amongst
organisers and participants
of the presence of the
cSAC and the presence of
sensitive marine species.
and pilot almanacs. SNH, EN and CCW
are currently discussing how to
standardise information on SACs to be
included on charts. Once this is agreed
then SNH will approach charts office.
There is a need to formally approach race
organisers in the meantime to remind
them about sensitive areas and to
request pre-race consultation. SNH can
contact race organisers in Q2 of
2002/2003.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Moderate
IHT – Chart 1078 of Inverness Firth now
has warning that the area is an cSAC.
Includes wording which flags up the
dolphin sensitivities and promotes
adherence to good practice codes of
practice. Also in sailing directions.
MCA – to attend consultation meetings
for above in conjunction with PAs and
advise on sensitivity of cSAC
D6.2.6
Where races take place,
MCA
encourage race organisers
to avoid areas sensitive to PA
marine wildlife or to slow
SNH
down when approaching
sensitive areas
SNH - See D6.2.5
MCA - See D6.2.5
S - Q4 2002
Moderate
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D6.3.1
Ensure that licensing of
research, wildlife-watching
and other boats:
a) is strongly linked to
responsible actions
towards marine mammals
b) Promotes quiet engine
and transmission systems
and use of propeller guards
c) provides advice on
vessel construction
d) is reviewed regularly and
is open to external
scrutiny
e) can respond quickly to
applications.
SNH - research
vessels
MCA,PA,HC wildlife vessels
SNH already licences cetacean research
vessels in the Firth and we will continue
to do so. Future licensing will be guided
by the findings of the dolphin disturbance
project. The DSP is also in contact with
HC re. Boat hire licences. HC have now
agreed to include compliance with the
DSP code as a condition of the licence
although this only covers vessels carrying
less than 12 passengers outwith defined
waters.
MCA – work with SNH, PA etc and
develop Dolphin Space programme to
incorporate, as required, above concerns
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Moderate
SNH continues to issue
licences to known cetacean
researchers in the Moray
Firth and encourages all
cetaceans researchers to
apply. Where applications
are not submitted then SNH
will chase these up to ensure
that the Habitats
Regulations are not being
breached.
A grant to a MF cruise boat
was refused on the basis that
it could not be shown that
the jet powered engine
proposed to use would
result in benefits to the
dolphins. This has
highlighted the need to better
understand what does and
does not constitute a “quiet
boat”.
THC boat hire licences are
now formally linked to
compliance with the DSP
code and this has resulted in
new wildlife cruise operators
signing up to the DSP this
year. The MCA are
considering if they can link
their boat certification to
compliance with local wildlife
codes – a decision on this
has not been made.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D6.3.2
D6.3.3
D6.3.4
Seek to extend the
SNH
licensing scheme for
dolphin research vessels to
include professional film
makers and
photographers.
Encourage researchers to
publish information
collected under the
licensing scheme.
Planned
C - Q3,
2002/2003
SNH
Consider the environmental SNH
carrying capacity for
research and wildlife
watching vessels in the
cSAC and, if appropriate,
advise the authorities that
no further licences be
issued to wildlife watching
boats in sensitive areas.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
S - Q4 2002
Planned
C - Q4 2003
SNH is constantly reviewing the situation
when new operators/researchers
approach the DSP/SNH for
accreditation/licences. However there has
never been a formal assessment about
what the carrying capacity (ecological
and economic) of the cSAC might be.
Moderate
The measures in place do
provide a mechanism for
regulating total numbers of
cruise boats/researchers in
the cSAC although this has
never been tested as no
licence or accreditation has
been with held on the basis
of breaching the carrying
capacity for the area. To do
so without understanding
critical thresholds would be
difficult and unreasonable
and this therefore highlights
the need to better understand
carrying capacities in the
Firth.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D6.3.5
Review and consolidate the
Dolphin Space
Programme including:
review of the composition,
roles and working
arrangements of the
Dolphin Space Programme
steering group, renewal of
partners’ commitments to
the steering group;
encouragement of greater
operator involvement in the
management of the
Dolphin Space
Programme; identification
of incentives and benefits
to accredited operators;
investigation of appropriate
regulatory powers; review
and development of the
Dolphin Space Programme
Guidelines; raising the
profile of the land-based
infrastructure for dolphin
watching; and, assisting
continued improvements in
the visitor experience
provided in the area.
Guidelines should be
applied to all
wildlife-watching boats,
including those who do not
go “to sea”.
SNH
All these areas are currently being
pursued by the DSP group. There are no
short-term solutions but these tasks are
being addressed now and unfinished
tasks will be carried over to subsequent
years.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Substantive
DSP composition covers all
the key players and this has
been expanded this year to
include the IHT and the NC.
Working arrangements with
respect to dealing with
serious breaches of the code
have been clarified and
complaints received by the
DSP steering group have
been followed up. Operators
have been invited to attend
the next meeting of the DSP
steering group. Various
incentives have been
delivered e.g. improved green
tourism website which
promoted accredited
operators plus positive press
releases. MCAs boat
certification powers are being
investigated.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D6.3.6
Encourage the
development of research
methods which have a
minimum impact on the
dolphins.
SNH
D6.3.7
Establish an inventory of
film, video and slides, to
minimise the need for
research, film or
photography trips
MFP
D6.3.8
Raise awareness in film
crews to issues of
disturbance, refer all
enquiries to land-based
sites or accredited
SNH
members of the Dolphin
Space Programme and
assist existing Dolphin
Space Programme
members to support
responsible behaviour by
film crews.
SNH assesses the suitability of research
methods at the time of licensing.
Licences will not be issued if they
adversely affect the dolphins without good
justification. We do not currently believe
that this is a major issue however if new
methods come on line (e.g. the desire to
take biopsies) then this will need to be
assessed.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Substantive
Negligible
SNH flag up issues to film crews when
approached but we have not proactively
raised this issue with them. Potential
projects exist to promote land based
watching, raising awareness and
developing a photo-library
(action D6.3.7).
Planned
C - Q4
2002/2003
Yes – methods deployed by
cetacean researchers are
reviewed annually when
licence applications are
submitted.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D6.3.9
Enforce law relative to
deliberate harassment of
wildlife.
NC
See 6.2.2
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Moderate
GP
Dredging and disposal of dredged material
D8.1.1
D8.1.2
D8.1.3
Investigate the requirement FRS, ML
to develop and implement
regional Environmental
SEPA
Quality Standards (EQSs)
as appropriate and consult
with key stakeholders to
consider the effect these
will have on the operations
of existing facilities and
industry.
FRS, ML - role as licensing authority
under FEPA and DRIVEN BY national
and international obligations
Monitor the impact of sea
disposal operations at
sites in the cSAC
FRS, ML - role as licensing authority
under FEPA and national and
international obligations
FRS, ML
Some
C - 2004
SEPA - role as licensing authority under
COPA and Environmental protection act
and DRIVEN BY national and
international obligations
Investigate the possibility FRS, ML
FRS, ML - role as licensing authority
of using non-contaminated
under FEPA and national and
dredged material
Licence applicant international obligations
beneficially (e.g. beach
nourishment).
Licensee
S - 2003
Substantive
Full
The action will have the
desired effect but FRS must
keep in line with international
requirements and if these
change or are modified FRS
have to refocus.
“Condition” of sea disposal
sites can be described and
confirmation that the
condition is not deteriorating.
Suitable sites will be
identified.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
D8.1.4
Review the range of
FRS, ML
contaminants currently
being monitored; consider
if it is adequate,
particularly in areas known
to be important for
dolphins
FRS, ML - role as licensing authority
under FEPA and national and
international obligations
S - 2002
Full
Increased the number of
parameters measured.
D8.2.1
Conduct risk assessments
at all sea disposal sites to
identify where and when
the potential for
disturbance and injury is
greatest; taking account of
the numbers of dolphins
sighted, location and time
of year.
FRS, ML - role as licensing authority
under FEPA and national and
international obligations
S - 2002
Moderate
Long-term dredging
requirements are being
identified and will be linked to
the dolphin distribution.
FRS, ML - sea
disposal
SNH
To be determined
- dredging
C - 2003
SNH - Information on dolphin distribution
is already known. This now needs to be
incorporated into the risk assessment.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D8.2.2
Develop a draft dredging
and sea disposal
management strategy in
light of risk assessments
(see D8.2.1):
a) incorporate specific
aspects of the Dolphin
Space Programme
b) advise applicants and
licensees of the dolphin
sensitive areas and
seasons so that they can
plan sea disposal
operations in advance
whilst taking account of
the most sensitive periods
c) establish the best
method for identifying
dolphin presence in the
vicinity of dredging and sea
disposal sites
immediately prior to and
during the operations
d) explore the possibility
and legality of using
acoustic scarers to keep
dolphins away from an
area during disposal
operations
e) explore the possibility of
installing hydrophones in
key areas to monitor
dolphin presence/absence.
f) consult with key
stakeholders to consider
the effect this will have on
the operations of existing
facilities and industry.
FRS, ML - sea
disposal
FRS, ML - role as licensing authority
under FEPA and national and
international obligations
S - 2002
SNH
To be determined
- dredging
C - 2003
SNH - A draft dumping and dredging
matrix has already been prepared. This
needs to be re-visited and finalised. SNH
see the FRS as taking the lead on this
although we will assist to see the work
completed. Work is ongoing to consider
acoustic methods (i.e. hydrophones) to
identify presence/absence of dolphins in
the Sutors area. SNH can explore the
legality of using acoustic scarers to deter
dolphins during dumping operations
although preliminary investigation
indicates that this would be against the
Habitats Regs. SNH to confirm the
position by Q2 2002/2003.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Substantive
Good progress on this and
sea disposal strategy in place,
will consider the use of
acoustic monitoring
techniques.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D8.3.1
Review existing data on
the effects of turbidity on
dolphin prey species;
consider the viability of
undertaking collaborative
research.
FRS, ML
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
FRS, ML - role as licensing authority
under FEPA and national and
international obligations
Negligible
Annual meeting with fisheries
stakeholders planned.
Planned
SEERAD Sea Fisheries Division are
working on the latest review and will
undertake to involve the MFP and other
interests in the area. Although triennial,
SEERAD are prepared to look at ongoing
suggestions on new and existing
prohibitions at any time. SEERAD is
aware that some types of fishing gear
might pose a risk to bottlenose dolphins.
Full
No financial support at
present as this is low priority.
Situation may change at
end of 2003.
Fishing
D9.1.1
Provide, in discussion with SAC MG
fishing interests,
information on how fishing Fish Orgs
activities may impact on
dolphins and fishery
management and identify,
through risk assessment,
potentially damaging
methods of fishing and
seek to have their use
controlled within the cSAC.
D9.1.2
Engage actively in the
SEERAD
triennial review of the
'Inshore Fishing (Scotland)
Act 1984' in light of the
dolphin interests
The Inshore Fishing
(Scotland) Act 1984 may be
used for marine environment
purposes, but at present
there have been no proposals
for prohibitions to
specifically protect dolphin
interests.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D9.1.3
Lobby the EC to ensure
that North Sea fish stocks
are managed sustainably.
SAC MG
Letter sent to SE and EC, stating the
SAC MG's concerns with regard to the
impact of fishery management on the MF
cSAC and the dolphins. It also stressed C - Sept 2002
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Full
the importance of the involvement of the
fishing communities in the development
of policies. It is also noted that the
individual organisations which are
represented on the cSAC MG are keen to
look at sustainability of the Moray Firth
in its wider sense.
D9.1.4
D9.1.5
Maintain a watching brief
on commercial salmon
netting activity
DSFB
Core part of DSFB activities.
Collaboration with SFPA.
Full
University of Aberdeen is developing a
model of the Moray Firth bottlenose
dolphins’ energy requirements with
relation to salmonids.
Some
SFPA
Model the energy
Uni of Abdn
requirements and total diet
of dolphins to better inform
understanding of potential
C - March 2003
interactions/impacts on
salmon stocks.
D9.1.6
Improve management of
fish stocks by producing a
fishery management plan
for each river system which
runs into the Moray Firth.
DSFB
Habitat surveys completed for all rivers
running into Cromarty Firth . National
framework for fishery management plans
under development by partners of
Scottish Fisheries Co-ordination Centre.
Substantive
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D9.2.1
Keep a watching brief on SFPA
the use of mono-filament
nets and pair-trawl activity.
D9.2.2
Maintain a watching brief
on legal salmon netting
activity (links to 9.1.5).
D9.2.3
Assess the significance of SNH
lost fishing gear in the
Moray Firth. If problems
exist, identify ways to
reduce lost gear and
DSFB
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Collaboration with SFPA. Core part of
DSFB activities. Strategy in place.
Full
SFIA will have information and expertise
on this.
Planned
C - Q4,
2003/2004
highlight the issue with the
industry.
D9.2.4
Find ways to minimise the SMRU
potential impacts to
dolphins of certain types of
fishing gear
Lead by Dr. Simon Northridge SMRU is
monitoring by-catch of cetaceans on
fishing nets and studying ways in which
this can be minimised. This project has
been funded by DEFRA.
Substantive
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D9.3.1
PAW awareness raising campaign “Fish
Net”. Leaflets, posters and press launch.
Develop a campaign to:
NC
a) clamp down on illegal
salmon netting activity; to GP
include awareness raising
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Full
C - 2002
of the impacts on dolphins DSFB
and other wildlife, and to
provide additional support
to fishery boards to police
and control illegal salmon
netting activities
b) reduce the market for
illegally caught salmon.
D9.3.2
D9.3.3
Hold meeting between key
stakeholders around the
Moray Firth to develop a
coordinated approach with
relation to bailiffing for
illegal salmon netting.
Maintain a watching brief
on the effectiveness of the
campaign to use zip tags
to mark legally caught wild
salmon in Ireland.
Consider the subsequent
development of quality
marks with local
fishermen, merchants and
retailers for legally caught
wild Moray Firth salmon.
MFP
MFP
In collaboration with DSFBs, WDCS, NC
and GP.
Requested info to West Fisheries Board Planned
– Ireland. Possibility of carrying out a
survey of opinion with regards to the
development of quality marks
Planned
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Marine Littering
D10.1.1
Seek to incorporate
MCA
environmental
responsibilities into the
PA
education and training of
ship owners and operators,
port users, fishermen and
recreational boat users.
MCA – raise awareness of cSAC and
litter/garbage implications for the dolphins
to local vessels and fishing boats during
PSC, FV inspections, PWMP audits etc;
MCA Marine Litter Campaign was
started in September 2002 with campaign
posters targeted at yacht/small vessel
users and encouragement of using
biodegradable litter bags. Another
brochure will be issued in early 2003 –
this campaign is nationwide.
Substantive
Insufficient time to check
effectiveness as yet
Substantive
IHT – waste plan working
well. Actions have certainly
helped. And spot checks are
carried out.
IHT – All port users are aware of the
cSAC and act accordingly.
D10.1.2
Investigate whether boats
are using port waste
disposal facilities and
ensure that correct
disposal facilities are
provided.
MCA
PA
CFPA - Review undertaken of waste
reception and notification of bins. A
recent inspection by the MCA took place.
MCA – examine above for ports in and
around cSAC during PWMP audits.
Consider targeting the area in the future.
IHT - Inspection by the MCA took place
recently.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D10.1.3
Ensure that those using
LA
ports/harbours are aware of
waste disposal facilities.
PA
CFPA - Review undertaken of waste
reception and notification of bins.
HT – As D10.1.2 Plans of waste
NoSYA
D10.2.1
Raise public awareness of LA
the environmental effects of
fly-tipping and
PA
inappropriate litter
disposal.
SW
SEPA
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Substantive
Yes
Substantive
Contribution to Education
C - 2002
reception areas are given to all vessels.
SEPA - raises awareness of issues on
land.
MC – Beach clean ups by the public are
a regular feature of the work of the Moray
Coast Ranger. They have also taken
place in Lossiemouth under the Moray
Town Centre Initiative. Beach clean ups
are also assisted by the Council’s waste
service who pick up the collected waste
and provide bags, gloves etc.
SW - " Think before you flush campaign".
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D10.2.2
Encourage the public to
pick up rubbish and lost
gear, to participate in
beach clean ups and to
recycle waste.
MFP
LA
MFP Project 6: Moray Firth Coastal Litter
Campaign which has included: a)
National information leaflet with local area
inserts produced and circulated widely;
b) Campaign development reports
produced and circulated for feedback; c)
Two local Adopt-a-Beach workshops
held.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Substantive
MC – Beach clean ups by the public are
a regular feature of the work of the Moray
Coast Ranger. They have also taken
place in Lossiemouth under the Moray
Town Centre Initiative. Beach clean ups
are also assisted by the Council’s waste
service who pick up the collected waste
and provide bags, gloves etc.
Military Activity and Civilian Aviation
D11.1.1
Record instances when
CAA
jettison of fuel occurs
within the cSAC and review MoD
existing guidance to
ensure that it is adequately
preventing aircraft fuel
contaminating coastal
waters.
D11.2.1
Enforce strict code of
CAA
controls for oil/fuel storage
and use. Ensure oil spill
MoD
response plans are
developed and practiced.
Maintain fuel interceptors
on storm water out-falls.
Planned
200% increase in Adopted
Beaches since Campaign
began. Influenced role of
National Marine Litter Group,
by taking forward local
issues.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D11.2.2
D11.3.1
D11.3.2
Ensure controls on choice SEPA
of chemicals selected,
type of applicators and
MoD
time and areas of use.
Extend the use of
environmentally friendly
and effective drainage/
treatment systems to all
airfields (e.g. reed beds, or
run-off treatments as
appropriate).
Seek experience and
information from other
areas to determine
potential impact and level
of risk from noise
disturbance by aircraft.
CAA
SEPA - collaborating with MoD on
environmentally friendly and effective
drainage/ treatment systems of airfield
run-off.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Substantive
MoD – meeting held with SEPA to
discuss the prevention of Pollution project
(Reed Bed Project). Data has been
collected over a second winter of trials.
Negligible
MoD
SNH
Review guidelines in other CAA
parts of the world for
minimising noise
MoD
disturbance from
helicopters and aircraft,
SNH
and if they are applicable,
adopt similar guidelines in
the Moray Firth.
Implement training and
awareness-raising material
for civil and military pilots
to avoid hovering over
marine mammals.
Negligible
Needs further analyses to be
able to establish way
forward.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D11.3.3
Maintain a watching brief CAA
on the use of aircraft and
helicopters for
MoD
observing/filming dolphins
and draw up guidelines if
SNH
necessary.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Negligible
Oil Pollution: Shipping, Boating and Land Run-off
D12.1.1
D12.3.1
D12.4.1
Ensure that port waste
disposal strategies are
regularly reviewed.
Request that harbour
authorities consider the
cSAC interests in their
strategies where
appropriate.
MCA
PA
MCA action – examine above for ports in
and around cSAC during PWMP audits.
Consider targeting the area in the future.
Check above during 2 year review of
PWMP. Target Moray Firth for
concentrated audit.
Substantive
IHT – Waste disposal strategies are
reviewed on a regular basis and records
are kept of vessels using port facilities.
Raise awareness of the
LA
consequences of
discharging bilge water and MCA
flushing of storage tanks
with all vessel operators, to PA
stress the importance of
compliance.
MCA – raise awareness of cSAC oil
pollution from bilges to local vessels and
fishing boats during PSC, FV inspections
etc.
Raise public awareness of SEPA
the potentially damaging
environmental effects of
SW
chronic and small scale oil
pollution through
The Scottish Oil Care Campaign (SOCC)
raises awareness and produces
guidelines on oil disposal, however, a
related project, the “Yellow Fish” initiative
(SW and SEPA), has a higher profile. It
Full
IHT – Have a mobile tank (free of charge)
for the use of local vessels to pump
bilges.
Some
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
involvement with the SOCC
and Yellow Fish initiative.
D12.5.1
Promote implementation
of SUDS for coastal
infrastructure
Developments
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
focuses on the problem of oil pollution
from industrial estates and involves
schools and communities.
MCA have initiated an information
campaign to raise awareness of the
effects of chronic oil pollution. Oily waste
material is covered by garbage controls.
HC
MC
- SEPA promotes SUDS.
- SEPA is waiting for powers to control
commercial storage of oil & chemicals.
Moderate
SEPA
D12.5.2
Encourage the
construction of oil storage
facilities.
HC
Some
MC
PA
D12.5.3
Raise awareness of oil
recycling facilities
HC
MC
D12.5.4
Endeavour to provide oil
recycling facilities.
HC
MC
D12.5.5
Collate information on
sources of chronic oil
pollution.
SEPA
- SEPA records complaints/ oil spillage
incidents, investigates, presents
solutions and tries to prevent recurrence.
Only land based pollution.
Full
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Oil Industry and related activities
D13.1.1
Develop Good Practice
Guidelines for minimising
the production of
underwater noise.
DTI
DTI is commissioning research into noise
effects on marine mammals and one of
the things to flow from this will be
Guidance Notes on noise. Until then
there are the JNCC seismic Guidelines
in place and a request to the industry to
make noise assessments from all
sources when appropriate.
Some
D13.1.2
Ensure that the impact of
noise production is
included in environmental
impact assessment.
DTI
Action implemented to relevant plans and
projects
Full
DTI, JNCC and operators are seeking to
S - April 2002
fund a joint project to identify and develop
mitigation strategies for all significant oil
and gas noise sources and identify where C - April 2003
Some
D13.1.3
Look at all sources of
noise from oil and gas
activity and identify gaps in
knowledge and hence
research needs.
DTI
JNCC
Operators
future research should be directed where
knowledge is insufficient.
Rig contractors
D13.2.1
Consider the use of
hydrophones to detect
dolphins during seismic
surveys
DTI
JNCC
Action implemented to relevant proposed
plans and projects. No seismic in Moray
Firth since implementation of this action.
High resolution site survey has taken
place outside site and Marine Mammal
Observer used as well as JNCC
Guidelines followed.
Full
Noise assessments and,
where relevant, appropriate
mitigation included for
relevant plans and projects in
the Moray Firth area.
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D13.2.2
D13.2.3
D13.3.1
Collate information and
model the possible effect
of seismic activity on the
dolphins.
DTI
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
There have been no seismic surveys
S - April 2002
planned for the Moray Firth and hence no
grounds for justification to allocate
resources to this work. Desk study to
C - Oct 2003
establish this would be carried out in the
event that seismic survey was proposed
in the area.
Negligible
Minimise the use of
DTI
seismic surveys and
encourage companies to
share/sell data. Elaborate
a report specifying the
distances to cSAC from
where a seismic survey is
likely to have an impact on
the dolphins and
highlighting the mitigation
measures required.
Minimising use of seismic and
selling/sharing of data ongoing in relation
to relevant plans and projects. The report
would include D13.2.2 requirements and
could be developed into a DTI Guidance
document. Again this project would only
be carried forward in the event of a
proposed seismic survey in the Moray
Firth. Tight resources mean that we are
unable to carry it out in-house.
Negligible
Review and maintain oil
DTI - Offshore
spill contingency plans and
ensure that all take
LA,PA - inshore
account of the dolphins
(e.g. that the movements
of dolphins are monitored
CFPA - Oil Spill Contingency plans
tested.
Full
in the event of a major oil
spill, and that procedures
are in place where oiled
dolphins strand ashore).
existing plans.
JNCC
DTI - Action to be implemented
immediately to new plans and
retrospectively as of April 2002 to
C - CFPA, IHTJan, Feb 2002;
DTI - Sep 2002
IHT – Oil Spill contingency plan tested on
11/02; IHT – section 7.3 deals with
cetaceans.
HC - Oil Pollution Plan in the process of being re – written
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D13.3.2
Co-ordinate the scheduling MCA
of all oil spill exercises
and plans.
LA
Operators
D13.3.3
Heighten awareness of the LA
potential impact of oil spills
with regard to the cSAC
MCA
and the conservation
features
PA
MCA – agenda item at forthcoming
DMSC meetings to register dates of
above.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Moderate
HC - New Oil Spill Plan will incorporate input
from relevant organisations and agencies
and the Exercise schedule , following on from
completion of the Plan , will involve as many
of the responding agencies as is practicable
MCA – raise awareness of cSAC and
impact of oil spills in DMSC meetings.
Examine link/reference to cSAC during 5
year review process of OPRC plans.
MCA will vigorously enforce - where
appropriate through prosecution action the stricter controls for the discharge of
oil or oily mixtures , to ensure the new
measures are effective (MARPOL Annex
1). High fines are available to the courts
to punish illegal discharges. MCA will
continue to make use of aerial
surveillance to detect or investigate
pollution incidents. Checks will also be
made, during General or Port State
Control Inspections, to ensure pollution
prevention equipment is in proper working
order and that appropriate records are
maintained. In “Marine Information Note
52”
MCA collects data regarding
ship/installation defects and pollution
incidents, which is recorded on a national
database for the Advisory Committee on
Protection of the Sea (ACOPS).
See D13.3.7
Full
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D13.3.4
D13.3.5
Ensure that the dolphins
are taken into account in
the development and
implementation of the
Marine Safety Code
PA
Clarify with the ports and
harbours how they will
work to add extra scrutiny
of passage plans, in the
interests of the cSAC.
LA
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Negligible
DTLR (overview)
MCA - review during Port Marine Safety To be
Code.
established
Negligible
PA
MCA
IHT – Passage plans to all vessels
entering Inverness Harbour. Copies are
available.
D13.3.6
Push ahead the
MCA
development and
implementation of
regulations referring to ship
to ship transfer of oil.
MCA – keep group updated on review
and implementation of legislation.
Maintain pressure on MCA HQ to
introduce regulations.
D13.3.7
Ensure that the Tal/SNH
MCA
Proposed Guidelines for
Dealing with Cetaceans in PA
the Event of an Oil Spill in
the Moray Firth, Scotland LA
are reviewed and
implemented.
MCA – Ensure MCA representative
attends review group for above document,
lead by SNH.
To be
established
IHT – Oil Spill Contingency Plan for IHT,
section 7.3 deals with cetaceans.
HC - agreed guidelines and, hopefully directions,
will be incorporated into Oil Spill Plan
Planned
Moderate
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D13.3.8
Applications for a licence DTI
to discharge cuttings and
water based muds within
the cSAC and adjacent
area will receive particular
scrutiny in relation to
potential impacts on the
site’s conservation
features.
D13.3.9
Applications for a licence
to discharge cuttings and
water
based muds within the
cSAC and adjacent area
will receive particular
scrutiny in relation to
potential impacts on the
site's conservation
features.
D13.4.1
Draw up awareness raising MCA
guidelines for inclusion in
pilotage almanacs and for
standby boat operators.
Procedure in place.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Full
DTI
Full
MCA action – Hydrographer of Navy
asked to include reference to cSAC and
navigation through cSAC.
Chart 1078 of Inverness Firth now has
warning that the area is an cSAC.
Includes wording which flags up the
dolphin sensitivities and promotes
adherence to good practice codes of
practice. Also in sailing directions.
Full
C - 2002 reviewed
annually
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D13.5.1
D13.5.2
D13.5.3
Clarify regulatory controls SEPA
in place covering de-fouling
and shot-blasting
PA
operations; explore
CFPA - Current regulations prohibit
discharge of shot blast or any other
material within port area.
development of additional
regulatory controls and
ensure that any such
operations are properly
considered in the context
of the cSAC.
FRS, ML - role as licensing authority
under FEPA and national and
international obligations.
FRS, ML
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Some
Controls are largely
understood but protocols are
not in place.
Moderate
PA takes this matter
seriously and receives
co-operation from other
regulatory partners. Good
practice guidelines to be
agreed.
Substantive
Areas known but not
“charted” as yet.
C - FRS - 2003
SEPA - only dry docks or slipways.
Develop good practice
SEPA
guidelines for de-fouling
and shot-blasting
PA
operations, including
guidelines to minimise the FRS, ML
discharge of old paint into
the Firth.
FRS, ML - role as licensing authority
under FEPA and national and
international obligations.
Agree anchor points in the FRS, ML
Moray Firth for carrying
out de-fouling and
MCA
shot-blasting operations
FRS, ML - role as licensing authority
under FEPA and national and
international obligations.
S - 2002
C - 2004
SEPA - only dry docks or slipways.
S - Jan 2003
C - Aug 2003
PA
D13.5.4
Investigate feasibility of
PA
using dry dock facilities to
carry out shot blasting and
painting where all residues
can be disposed of
on-shore.
To be
established
Negligible
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D13.6.1
Ensure that
DTI
de-commissioning
operations adjacent to or JNCC
within the cSAC make due
consideration of the
dolphins/cSAC and that
effective mitigation
strategies are developed
and implemented.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
DTI - Action implemented to relevant
proposed plans and projects (no
decommissioning operations have
occurred to date).
Full
Trade and sewage discharges
D14.1.1
Review the known impacts SEPA
of these contaminants on
marine mammals and key
elements of their food
chain and re-consider the
discharge consents for
substances where
necessary.
SEPA - facultative review of consents
every 4 years. But some review at the
moment due to new EC Directives.
Moderate
D14.2.1
Encourage the safe
SEPA
disposal of potentially
polluting materials through
awareness raising
initiatives.
It is illegal to dispose of potentially
polluting materials without a consent
issued by SEPA. It is illegal to dispose
of any waste.
Substantive
Management Action
Lead Bodies
Projects
Start S
Completion C
D14.2.2
Consider the monitoring
requirements for
hormone-disrupting
substances and keep a
watching brief on
Nationally developed
SEPA
SEPA has made some contribution to
the EDMAR (Endocrine Disruption in the
Marine Environment) project.
Rate of
Desired Effect?
implementation
Some
Download