DRAFT REQUEST FOR EQUIVALENT FACILITATION Modification of Detectable Warning Tactile Strip to Accommodate Bridge Plate for New Low Floor Modern Streetcar Vehicles Draft 12/21/2011 I. Introduction In conjunction with its Tucson Modern Streetcar project (TMS), The Tucson Department of Transportation (TDOT) submits this request for a determination of equivalent facilitation pursuant to 49 CFR 37.7(b). This determination would allow TDOT to utilize an modified method of compliance related to detectable warning area interface with modern streetcar vehicle bridge plates at stop platforms as outlined in Department of Justice 2010 Standards for Accessible Design (2010 Standards), Sections 705.2 & 810.5 and 49 CFR 38.83. Specifically, Sections 705.2 and 810.5, require that an accessible rail station have detectable warning surfaces at platform boarding edges shall be 24 inches wide and shall extend the full length of the public use areas of the platform. The detectable warning shall consist of a surface of truncated domes as required by section 705 of 2010 Standards. The purpose of the detectable warning is to inform blind or visually impaired passengers that they are nearing the platform edge. The warning must be of a contrasting color (i.e., dark vs. light) and texture (i.e., truncated domes vs. smooth surface), as well as (in the case of interior surfaces) differing from the platform in resiliency and sound-on-cane contact. In order to achieve Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance and safe use of the bridge plate, TDOT is submitting this "Request for Equivalent Facilitation" to the Federal Transit Administration proposing a minor modification to the required detectable warning strip on stop platforms. The modification is the inclusion of approximately a 15.5-inch "clear zone," to the standard 24-inch wide detectable warning strip. The clear zone is a flat area without truncated domes to receive the bridge plate. Without the clear zone, the interface between the bridge plate and the detectable warning tactile strip would violate a vertical elevation change limitation of 49 CFR 38.83. The proposed modification will still allow the tactile warning strip to serve the purpose it was originally intended for; warning visually impaired persons of the hazards in the circulation path. In this case, the hazard being identified is the edge of the platform and drop-off to the street level trackbed. II. Entity Information Requesting Agency: Tucson Department of Transportation (TDOT) Address: 201 North Stone Avenue, Sixth Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 Contact Person: Ms. Shellie Ginn, Tucson Modern Streetcar Program Manager Telephone: (520) 837-6698 III. Specific Provision of Part 38 Concerning which TDOT is Seeking a Determination of Equivalent Facilitation Two separate ADA design standards apply to the TMS project which is vehicle bridge plate design standards and detectable warning strips at transit stop platforms. Streetcar Vehicle Bridge Plate Requirements 49 CFR 38.83 requires all new light rail vehicles, other than level entry vehicles, to provide a level-change mechanism or boarding device (e.g., lift, ramp or bridge plate). 1 DRAFT 49 CFR 38.83(c)(3) specifies that the "transition from roadway or station platform and the transition from vehicle floor to the ramp or bridge plate may be vertical without edge treatment up to ¼ inch. Changes in level between ¼ inch and ½ inch shall be beveled with a slope no greater than 1:2. Further, 49 CFR 38.83(c) (5) specifies acceptable slope for bridge plates. The purpose of the bridge plate design standard is to allow a passenger using a mobility aid to easily transition from bridge plate to station platform. Detectable Warning Strip Requirements The Department of Justice 2010 Standards for Accessible Design (2010 Standards) require a 24-inch strip of detectible warnings (truncated domes) along the edge of a transit boarding platform (2010 Standards, §§ 705.2, 810.5). As currently designed the detectable warning area is flush with the edge of 9 ½ inch high stop platform. (see Appendix A "Stop Design Plans"). Additionally, the plans provide for a different colored detectable warning area that is 8’ wide to accommodate modern streetcar vehicle bridgeplate deployment. The purpose of the warning strip is to provide a warning to the visually impaired and other transit passengers, of hazards in the circulation path. In the case of transit platforms, the detectable warning strip alerts individuals to the platform edge and drop-off to the in street trackbed. Equivalent facilitation approval is necessary because TMS is unable to comply with both of the above design standards at the same time. TMS proposes a slight modification to the detectible warning strip design to accommodate a bridge plate that meets the requirements of 49 CFR 38.83 IV. Alternate Method of Compliance During the design process there was an evaluation/coordination of similar systems to determine the safest and most accessible means of boarding the vehicle. Upon consultation with several transit agencies the TMS project has decided to pursue a modification to the detectable warning tactile strip as an equivalent replacement to the standard 24 inch wide tactile strip. This modification has been successfully utilized by other agencies and is proposed by the TMS to resolve the incompatibility between the 2010 Standards for the detectable warning and the 49 CFR 38.83 bridge plate design standard. A. Background Information Tucson Modern Streetcar Project The Tucson Modern Streetcar Project will provide a 3.9-mile new streetcar system and add 18 new streetcar stops pairs. The project includes the purchase of seven (7) new streetcar vehicles. The Project Construction Grant Agreement for the TMS Project was executed by the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA) and TDOT December 2010. The project is currently under construction and revenue service is scheduled to begin in fall 2013. The new vehicles, which are being manufactured in Clackamas, Oregon by Oregon Iron Works, will have the same general design as The City of Portland’s existing Streetcar’s fleet. The design of the bridge plates for the new Tucson vehicles is nearly identical to the existing streetcar in operation. See Exhibit 1 for the interface of the existing bridge plates and the tactile warning area for the existing Portland Streetcar System. 2 DRAFT Exhibit 1. Existing Portland Streetcar bridge plate and tactile warning area interface B. Prior Determination of Equivalent Facilitation for other Systems TDOT has discussed the operational experience regarding bridge plate and tactile warning interface with both San Diego’s Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and Portland’s TriMet System. Both agencies have received similar equivalent facilitation rulings related to their existing light rail lines. MTS In 2006, the FTA granted MTS's request for Equivalent Facilitation to install the modified tactile warning strips on the Mission Valley East line. On November 21,2011, the FTA granted MTS's request to extend this Equivalent Facilitation to MTS's entire light rail system. This modification was necessary to meet the dual mandates of providing a tactile warning strip for the visually impaired, while at the same time providing a smooth surface for our wheelchair ramp bridgeplates to rest on our platforms. The modified tactile warning strips have been in place for MTS’s Mission Valley East light rail line since it opened in 2005. Based on a review their files, MTS has not received any formal customer complaints, claims, legal actions or lawsuits directly related to this design. There is no evidence that use of this design has resulted in accidents or injuries to MTS users. 3 DRAFT TriMet In 1995, the FTA granted TriMet's request for Equivalent Facilitation to install the modified detectable warning platform edge on the Westside Light Rail Project. TriMet was the first transit jurisdiction to utilize low floor light rail vehicles (LFLRV) equipped with bridge plates to provide near level boarding. TriMet moved to LFLRVs with bridge plates to provide improved accessibility versus other methods such as lifts and mini-high platforms. Included in TriMet’s request for Equivalent Facilitation was testing documenting whether there was a loss of detectability between the proposed modifications to the detectable warning area at station platforms and the required 24” detectable warning area. These tests concluded that there was no loss of detectability with their modified design. The detectable warning platform edge have been in use on TriMet’s Light Rail platforms since 1995 and have been operating successfully. C. Design Detail The TMS new streetcar vehicles will be fully compliant with 49 CFR subpart D, with the proposed exception that bridge plates will not have side barriers as required by required by 49 CFR 38.83(c)(4). Vehicle floor height will be 12 to 14 inch above top of rail, depending on passenger load and wheel wear. The vertical gap between the station platform and the streetcar floor will be 2 1/2 to 4 1/2 inches. Bridge plate slope will be 1:6 or less, at 50% passenger load, in compliance with 49 CFR 38.83(c)(5). The end of the bridge plate will be a maximum of 1/2 inch vertical and beveled at 1:2 gradient. However, the TMS bridge plate design standard results in the bridge plate deploying onto the area designated for the tactile warning required by the 2010 ADA Standards. If the bridge plates were to land on top of the detectable warning domes, the transition from platform to bridge plate would exceed the maximum transition allowed under 49 CFR 38.83(c)(3) and pose a barrier to individuals with mobility impairments and those using mobility aides and devices. The 1/2 inch bridge plate thickness combined with the 0.2-inch dome height on the tactile strip makes an abrupt step of 0.7-inches onto the bridge plate surface. The truncated dome and bridge plate combined would present a tripping hazard for ambulatory users and creates a hazard and reduces accessibility for persons using mobility devices. In order to address the 49 CFR 38.83(c)(3) vertical change requirement, it is necessary for the bridge plate end to be located below the top of the truncated detectable warning domes. TMS therefore proposes a modification to the detectable warning area design at the TMS stop platforms. The proposed modification will allow the TMS project to meet the intent of both Standards. The proposed modified tactile strip will still be 24- inches wide (see Exhibit 2), and will have the in-line 0.2-inch truncated domes with a nominal spacing of 2.35-inch center-to-center spacing. To accommodate the bridge plate, a flat, approximately 15.5-inch section of the tactile strip will be provided to enable the transition from the tactile strip to the bridge plate and meet the ADA requirements for transitional surfaces. As required by the 2010 Standards, the modified tactile warning area is proposed to run along an 8 foot section along the platform that will coincide with the streetcar door equipped with the bridge plate. The remaining length of the stop will have a standard tactile warning area of a contrasting color (see Appendix A). This proposed modification accommodates the bridge plate and increases accessibility for persons using 4 DRAFT mobility devices, while at the same time retaining sufficient coverage of the detectible warning strip to serve its intended purpose to alert the visually impaired of hazards in the circulation path and the proximity of the platform edge. Exhibit 2. Proposed Modified Tactile Warning Area/Bridge Plate Interface V. Documentation of Public Participation The Tucson Modern Streetcar Project has integrated accessible design in all project elements. During the planning phase of the project the planning was coordinated with a Citizens Liaison Group (CLG) and a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), which included representation from 35 stakeholder groups and over 50 design professionals respectively. Included on the CLG was representation from the City of Tucson’s Commission on Disability Issues (CODI). The CLG met 13 times, and 4 additional meetings were held with CODI representatives to review accessibility issues for the design of the vehicle and the design of the stops. This input, as well as a review of applicable American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations and standards were integrated in to the design of both the vehicle and the stops. The following is a listing of meetings held: Group Community Liaison Group Meeting Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Date November 4, 2004 December 8, 2004 Community Liaison Group Meeting Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Community Liaison Group Meeting January 13, 2005 March 3, 2005 March 29, 2005 5 DRAFT Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Community Liaison Group Meeting Community Liaison Group Meeting Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Community Liaison Group Meeting Technical Advisory Committee Meetings Community Liaison Group Meeting Technical Advisory Committee Meetings Community Liaison Group Meeting Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Community Liaison Group Meeting Technical Advisory Committee Meetings Community Liaison Group Meeting Community Liaison Group Meeting Technical Advisory Committee Meeting CODI Transportation Subcommittee Meeting CODI Transportation Subcommittee Meeting Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Community Liaison Group Meeting Community Liaison Group Meeting Technical Advisory Committee Meeting CODI Transportation Subcommittee Meeting CODI Transportation Subcommittee Meeting May 18, 2005 May 19, 2005 October 6, 2005 October 6, 2005 November 9, 2006 November 9, 2006 February 28, 2007 February 28, 2007 June 27, 2007 June 27, 2007 November 1, 2007 November 1, 2007 September 18, 2008 March 11, 2009 March 11, 2009 November 10, 2009 November 18, 2009 December 3, 2009 December 3, 2009 June 21, 2010 June 21, 2010 July 21, 2010 March 16, 2011 In addition to the CLG, TAC, and CODI Transportation Subcommittee meetings, The TMS held special meetings with the following groups to specifically discuss the proposed Equivalent Facilitation Representatives of CODI on December 1, 2011 The University of Arizona Disability Resource Center (UADRC), December 6, 2011 Southern Arizona Association for the Visually Impaired (SAAVI), December 7, 2011 Positive comment was received from each of these groups and they supported the request, see Appendix B-E for support letters. Based on this, TMS has scheduled a public hearing on January 10, 2012 to take comment on the draft Request. Public notice for the hearing will be provided using the following methods: The public notice for the hearing also indicated that the document was available in alternate formats upon request and that written comment would also be accepted. Hard copies of the document were provided at the hearing. The hearing was attended by XX individuals, and public comment was received, and included in Appendix F. 6 DRAFT APPENDIX A TYPICAL STOP DESIGN PLAN 7 DRAFT 8 DRAFT APPENDIX B SAN DIEGO’S METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM (MTS) SUPPORT LETTER 9 DRAFT 10 DRAFT 11 DRAFT APPENDIX C TUCSON COMMISSION ON DISABILITY ISSUES (CODI) SUPPORT LETTER 12 WB3 Management Consulting Integration…Without Assimilation. DRAFT Willie H. Bond, III Chairperson Tucson Commission on Disability Issues Tucson, Arizona 85726 December 19, 2011 Shellie Ginn Streetcar Program Manager City of Tucson, Department of Transportation P. O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 Ms. Ginn, I, and several other Commissioners, had the pleasure of meeting with the Streetcar program staff at the beginning of December. I must say that your staff proved to be very informative and helpful in answering all questions posed by the CODI. We left the meeting feeling secure in that the streetcar program, with the adjustments listed below, should meet the foreseeable needs of not just the disabled residents and visitors of Tucson, but all residents and visitors of Tucson! With that said, CODI supports the Tucson's modern streetcar project Equivalent Facilitation requests as follows: 1. Modification of the tactile warning strips (truncated domes) to accommodate the bridge plate at designated locations at the passenger stops. 2. Removal of the bridge plate side rails CODI encourages the Federal Transit Administration to approve these requests. 13 Phone: 520.245.2585 | fax: 520.269.6362 | 14344 S. Via Del Moro, Sahuarita, Arizona 85629 | www.wb3consulting.com DRAFT APPENDIX D SOUTHERN ARIZONA ASSOCIATION FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED (SAAVI) SUPPORT LETTER 14 DRAFT 15 DRAFT APPENDIX E THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER (UARDC) SUPPORT LETTER 16 DRAFT 17 DRAFT APPENDIX F PUBLIC COMMENTS 18 DRAFT 19