Enquiry & Contact Management Project Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Document Management Distribution List Name Company Position Date Leo Gillette University of Adelaide Project Manager 2/06/2014 G Martin, L Hill, D Lamb, C Cherry University of Adelaide Project Sponsors and stakeholders 13/06/2014 M Gregory, A M Betros, J Carey, N University of Adelaide Lippett Technical Resources 13/06/2014 E&CM Board Members Project Governance 17/06/2014 University of Adelaide Version Control Revision # Change Description 1.0 Creation 2.0 3.0 Update following reviews with L Gillette Update following presentation to G Martin, L Hill, D Lamb and C Cherry Communication Plan Approval Date Author R Gifford 12/06/2014 17/06/2014 R Gifford R Gifford Page 1 of 21 Registration Project Name: Enquiry & Contact Management Contact Details: Leo Gillette, E&CM Project Manager 8313 0966 leo.gillette@adelaide.edu.au Robyn Gifford, Change Manager 0402 091 277 robyn.gifford@adelaide.edu.au E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 2 of 21 Table of Contents 1. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Purpose and Objectives................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2. Scope ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2.1. Defining and managing stakeholders throughout the Project .................................................................................................................. 4 1.2.2. Establishing and/or utilising engagement mechanism for target audiences ............................................................................................ 4 1.2.3. Monitoring the awareness, understanding, commitment and uptake of the proposed changes ............................................................ 4 1.3. Critical Success Factors.................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.4. Assumptions and Constraints........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 2. DEFINING AND MANAGING STAKEHOLDERS ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 3. ENGAGEMENT MECHANISMS ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1. Overview of Engagement Mechanisms......................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2. Work Streams .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 3.3. Process for Developing Procedures and Communication ........................................................................................................................... 12 3.4. Subject Matter Experts................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 3.5. Reference Groups........................................................................................................................................................................................ 14 3.6. Change Agents ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 3.7. Leadership Forums ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 3.7.1. Engaging Staff and Defining Expectations ............................................................................................................................................... 18 3.7.2. Reward & Recognition ............................................................................................................................................................................. 19 3.8. Customer Forums ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 20 4. MONITORING AWARENESS, UNDERSTANDING AND BUY-IN ......................................................................................................................... 20 4.1. Formal Reviews with Key Stakeholders ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.2. Surveys to Monitor Employee’s Awareness and Attitude to the Planned Changes ................................................................................... 21 4.3. Operational Metrics .................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 3 of 21 1. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY 1.1. Purpose and Objectives The stakeholder engagement strategy is designed to achieve a level of support and participation appropriate for each individual and team who will contribute to the success of the Enquiry & Contact Management (E&CM) Project. It will also be used to inform the communication plan, which in addition to conveying relevant messages and satisfying information requirements, is instrumental in providing feedback and engaging stakeholders throughout the E&CM Project. The objectives of the stakeholder engagement strategy are to: 1.1.1. Ensure the Enquiry and Contact Management Project team understand and respond appropriately to the needs, interests and concerns of those who are impacted by the planned changes 1.1.2. Manage the expectations of stakeholders in line with the scope, business requirements and deliverables of the Project 1.1.3. Make explicit the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders to facilitate change within their spheres of influence and support them to take action 1.1.4. Establish consultative mechanisms to provide stakeholders with the opportunity to participate in designing, planning and implementing change (as appropriate) and to build share ownership of solutions 1.2. Scope The stakeholder engagement strategy will address the needs of the Enquiry & Contact Management Project as documented within the Draft Project Initiation Document (17/03/2014). It consists of the following major components: 1.2.1. 1.2.2. 1.2.3. Defining and managing stakeholders throughout the Project Establishing and/or utilising engagement mechanism for target audiences Monitoring the awareness, understanding, commitment and uptake of the proposed changes Excluded from scope is the broader engagement of stakeholders in the program of work associated with the University of Adelaide Customer Relationship Management Strategy (as proposed by Customer Connect Australia - August 2013) because this is yet to be E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 4 of 21 operationalised. Without clear objectives and priorities that are integrated with business plans and reflected in individual objectives, an appropriate engagement strategy cannot be defined. The University’s established planning processes are the most appropriate mechanisms by which these are achieved. However, many stakeholders have imbued their expectations of the E&CM Project with broader needs to transform student services’ processes (to improve the student experience and work across structural boundaries as one University team). In addition, the E&CM Project’s success will be judged on the basis of how well it provides a foundation for a single CRM platform for the University. Consequently, stakeholder engagement will need to place the in-scope process design, data management and communications within the broader context of the CRM and Student e Experience Strategies and integrate the three distinct but related streams of work: E.g. Online access to the Knowledge Base and integration with other online services E.g. Data capture reflects the lifecycle status and segmentation defined for students, prospective students and schools E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy E.g. Enquiry and contact management processes (inbound and outbound) and prospect pipeline management; Process design responds to customer expectations and needs Page 5 of 21 1.3. Critical Success Factors An effective approach to stakeholder engagement will require the following: 1.3.1. The changes associated with the Enquiry & Contact Management Project are defined clearly and at a sufficient level of detail to identify all of the stakeholders who will be impacted. 1.3.2. The project plan is sufficiently detailed and stable to ensure stakeholder engagement is timed appropriately to deliver the outcomes required. 1.3.3. The time required by staff to participate in both the project and change management activities is supported by relevant leaders (i.e. outcomes, activity and time frames are agreed and relative priority is appropriately assigned). It is incumbent upon the Project Team to define these requirements and provide reasonable notice to achieve this. 1.3.4. The University of Adelaide’s workforce is large, fractured and dispersed across many sites. Local perspectives will need to be seen as subordinate to the common needs and objectives of the University. Departmental/Faculty level concerns and needs must be understood and reflected in the alternatives considered and a preferred solution recommended for the whole of the University. 1.3.5. A network of key influencers within and across portfolios and functions will be necessary to provide an effective catalyst for change. 1.3.6. Recognition that the breadth and level of stakeholder engagement will change depending upon the phase of the E&CM Project. Broad engagement by the centralised services of the DVCA, all Faculties, Marketing & Communications and the University Engagement Branch will be necessary to design an enterprise solution for E&CM processes. However, the deployment of the solution will only require the engagement of the in-scope Faculty and departments. 1.3.7. The voice of the customer must be present and authoritative when decisions which impact them are being made. 1.4. Assumptions and Constraints The assumptions and constraints upon which this strategy is based include the following: 1.4.1. The Change Manager position, specific to the E&CM Project, is funded until 30 June 2014. The new role (expected to be at a program level within the DVCA or PMO) will be unable to directly manage stakeholders given their number, diversity E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 6 of 21 and the program load. It follows that stakeholder management responsibilities for key players and teams will need to be allocated to specific individuals. The role of a Change Manager will be to provide periodic review and tactical adjustment as required. This devolved responsibility is consistent with line management’s change leadership role, but will require additional coordination by some individuals for the duration of the E&CM Project. 1.4.2. The project funding to support active participation in the Project (i.e. back-fill) is adequate. 1.4.3. Managers are expected to lead and manage change within their teams as part of their role responsibilities. This is explicit within the University’s current leadership capabilities and includes ensuring change benefits are realised by developing clear performance objectives. Change leadership for the E&CM Project is expected to require specific objectives and appropriate feedback mechanisms within the PDR process. 1.4.4. There is capacity within current budgets to reward and recognise desired behaviour change within teams and the Division. 1.4.5. Current E&CM processes are fractured by function and Faculty and will not be documented. The impact of a consistent process enabled by technology will be varied. Understanding this impact will need to be developed at a team level as the new procedures are defined. 1.4.6. There is no format, nor consultative process, currently required for the development and approval of University wide procedures. This process will be designed and agreed for the purposes of the E&CM Project. 1.4.7. The solution’s “out-of-the-box” process maps will be recognised as best practice and the basis for the implementation of the University’s new E&CM processes. Any variations will be challenged and substantiated before approval is sought from the E&CM Board. 1.4.8. Subject matter experts, guided by the Supplier and input from other Universities, will define the “to-be” procedures with involvement from customers. 1.4.9. Student participation will be on a voluntary basis and the cost of any associated hospitality and recognition will be accommodated within the Project budget. 1.4.10. There are established meeting structures that involve all levels of management which allow for the rapid cascade of information and associated feedback from within the in-scope Faculty and departments. E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 7 of 21 2. DEFINING AND MANAGING STAKEHOLDERS The development and implementation of a stakeholder management plan will follow a well-recognised process. This is outlined below along with the expected outcomes, person accountable and any dependencies within the overall Project Plan: Process Outcomes Accountability Timing & Dependencies Stakeholder identification and analysis Develop stakeholder management strategies and plan Stakeholders, their commitments & concerns, current and target level of engagement are documented Assign responsibility for individual and team stakeholders. Change Manager May Change Manager June Execute stakeholder management plan Monitor outcomes and take corrective action Engagement mechanisms are defined and agreed. Sign off by Project Manager Stakeholders levels of engagement are maintained or increased to the target level. As per plan Plan updated monthly Change Manager Any risks to the Project’s success are escalated to the E&CM Project Board. Change Manager E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Project Plan is sufficiently detailed and stable to align stakeholder communications with key milestones and/or activities. Relevant line managers support assigned responsibilities (as required) and reflect them in PDRs. June – Conclusion of Project Project specific engagement mechanisms are established. June – Conclusion of Project As required Page 8 of 21 The responsibilities of those assigned to an individual stakeholder are as follows: Take an active role in communicating relevant information in a way that resonates with their audience and builds awareness, understanding and commitment to the change Understand and stay current with the commitments and concerns of stakeholders throughout the lifecycle of the project and to provide feedback to the Project Team Monitor the effectiveness of stakeholder management strategies, adjust them and/or escalate concerns to the Change Manager as required Update the stakeholder management plan each month The Project Team will brief responsible individuals prior to any planned communications with their assigned stakeholders and advise them of any ad-hoc communications that occur as soon as possible after the event. 3. ENGAGEMENT MECHANISMS 3.1. Overview of Engagement Mechanisms Engagement mechanisms may be characterised as bottom-up, middle-out or top-down and are most effective when used together to facilitate change. In addition to BAU meetings, the following engagement and consultative mechanisms will be established and/or utilised: MECHANISM SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS (SMEs) (Organised around work streams) PURPOSE Lead the definition and documentation of UoA approach, process and content, as appropriate Consult and involve stakeholders to develop buy-in and support Guide the development and coordinate test plans (user acceptance) Provide input into training and support strategies to effectively implement the solution E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy ROLE Accountable for Project Team deliverables Consult across teams, with external parties (i.e. supplier, other Universities) and customers, as appropriate Understand the impact of change and ensure the rationale and benefits are communicated Support key users Page 9 of 21 REFERENCE GROUPS (Nominated to participate as their team’s representative in specific work stream activities) CHANGE AGENTS (Organised around departments/Faculties) LEADERSHIP FORUMS CUSTOMER FORUMS AND FEEDBACK MECHANISMS Ensure local needs and concerns are understood when alternatives are being identified and/or evaluated by the Project Team/SMEs Provide input and review new UoA approaches, processes and content, as appropriate Ensure new “whole of University” approaches add value to customers and staff As a key user, develop early competence in the use of the solution Provide input and review change management strategies and plans Encourage and support consistent application of change management tools Facilitate cultural change (align values, thinking and behaviour; build energy and momentum) Give feedback on the extent and impact of the change management activities within their department(s)/Faculty Actively engage Leaders in managing change Provide a structured process by which communication and participation occur Establish clear expectations and accountability Provide change management tools Identify and recognise early wins To co-create new “whole of University” approaches that take account of customers’ needs, expectations and preferences Shift an internal perspective (“what we do”) to an external customer focus Integrate relevant measurement with BAU processes (i.e. service level agreements, satisfaction, value) E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Consult within their teams Contribute knowledge and end user perspective Assist in evaluating the impact of change on end users Advocate new approaches and their benefits Support end users Assist in coordination of activities to fit within BAU schedules Assist with the development and implementation of the communication plan Monitor stakeholder engagement Coach and support Managers Model change Enable the participation of staff in key project activities Regularly reinforce key messages, share information and provide feedback Lead the individuals in their team through the transition Recognise and reward staff for their contribution to the change Identify and prioritise opportunities to improve customer satisfaction (for within scope processes/content) Develop criteria/measures for judging success Provide feedback to guide progress Page 10 of 21 3.2. Work Streams Distinct Work Streams will be used to frame project deliverables, provide accountability for the Project Team and focus consultation with and involvement of stakeholders. There are five proposed work streams based on the E&CM Project’s current scope (these are subject to confirmation by the Supplier): WORK STREAM ENQUIRY & CONTACT MANAGEMENT (Email, F2F, Phone) PROSPECTIVE STUDENTS (Lead Capture & Management) MARKETING CAMPAIGN SERVICES (Lead Generation & Administration) TASKS Determine contact that should be recorded Develop process for responding to enquiries (incl. registration process, prioritisation, allocation to queues, scripting responses, setting appointments) Define Service level Agreements, responsibilities for centralised Student Services, Faculties, Schools and Academics and opportunities for workforce optimisation Design measures and reports to track progress (status) and performance Integrate customer feedback into the E&CM process (BAU) Case Management (TBD) Develop the lifecycle, segmentation and value propositions for prospective students and schools Develop UG pipeline management process (with and without Agent involvement) Define contact management processes for Schools and International Agents Determine standard reports and key performance indicators Design campaign work flow Creation of client lists Process for content development and approval Personalisation and variations Guidelines for contact management (e.g. maximum number of contacts within a given period) Campaign management (i.e. track, analyse and respond) Define process for generating leads for post graduate study from current students Standard reports and KPIs E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy SME (LEAD) Student Administration Office for Future Students Faculty of Professions Page 11 of 21 KNOWLEDGE BASE (Self-Service/ Web Enquiry) TECHNICAL & SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION 3.3. Develop framework (i.e. categories, scope, define Q&A from customer perspective) Coordinate development of sufficient content for “Go Live” Define process for ongoing governance and maintenance of content (i.e. style guides; process to author, review, approve and publish) Determine KPIs and standard reports to support ongoing improvement Integrate with UoA internet/intranet site Identity management and de-duping Data definition and management (e.g. updating databases, single source of truth) Development of use cases and configuration plan (incl. prototyping) Workspaces Specify and plan for data migration and integration (e.g. PeopleSoft, exchange, single sign on) Coordinate testing (incl. functionality, security and performance) Deployment of the software (incl. environment and mobility specifications) Ask Adelaide Technical Resources Process for Developing Procedures and Communication Each Work Stream will need to produce documentation that: defines the planned changes identifies those impacted by the changes outlines the benefits of those changes for specific target audiences describe the new work procedures in sufficient detail to allow for their consistent execution across the University This content will take the form of University of Adelaide procedures and Project communication. The process for developing and approving procedures and relevant communications is recommended as follows: E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 12 of 21 3.4. Subject Matter Experts Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) will be identified to lead Project Work Streams, as members of the E&CM Project Team. These individuals will be sourced from teams whose functional responsibilities will be significantly impacted by the E&CM solution and they will participate in the following activities: 1. As the lead for a Project Work Stream, define and document the new UoA approach, guided by the Out-Of-The Box Solution process, existing Faculty of the Professions configuration (if relevant), common needs across the University and customers’ expectations E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 13 of 21 2. Explore the impact of the changes on local teams to assist with communication and change management activities: Is it easy to understand? Does it cover the scope of tasks currently undertaken? How does this compare to the current way of doing things? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed changes? How can we make this work? What support will be required? 3. Assist in the development of use cases and testing of the E&CM solution 4. Participate in the development of training materials and support to users after “Go Live” The proposed selection criteria for SMEs are: 3.5. Will be directly impacted by the deployment of the E&CM Solution (and their work stream outcomes specifically) Recognised by stakeholders as authoritative in the work stream domain and an appropriate lead for the design of a whole of University approach (e.g. experience provides the broadest perspective on requirements and/or impact) Well respected and influential across teams Willing and able to take a significant role in the Project (Note: their substantive roles may be back-filled) Strong influencing, relationship building and organisational skills Reference Groups Changes to E&CM processes will have a significant impact on the day to day work of student services and marketing staff that are dispersed across multiple departments, Faculties, Schools and sites. These groups are instrumental to the successful implementation of the planned changes and the impact of them may be far-reaching and include: Decision making authority (e.g. implementing process changes that respond only to local needs or requests) Day-to-day task execution, due to a drop in confidence and competency when the new procedures and solution are introduced Role responsibilities (e.g. centralisation and/or decentralisation of functions, changes in service standards and expectations that may impact on work volume) Perceived standing within their local work teams (e.g. will they be perceived as less efficient, knowledgeable or supportive in meeting the demands of clients and/or staff?) E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 14 of 21 Each team impacted by the E&CM changes (both in the Phase 1 deployment and subsequent roll out to other Faculties and departments) may nominate an individual as a reference person for the SME(s) of a relevant work stream(s). This will ensure that broad consultation is afforded to develop an appropriate University wide approach. The remit of the Reference Group is to: guide the development of a University wide approach via consultative processes and validation of the proposed solution provide guidance on the local impact of the proposed changes (incl. perceived pros and cons) participate in the testing of the solution, attend pilot training (and provide feedback for improvement), as able support end users within their team after “Go Live” These activities will place Reference Group participants “ahead of the curve” in terms of their awareness and understanding of how proposed changes will impact roles and work-loads. Their buy-in and commitment, alongside their line manager, will largely determine the success of the change process within their teams. The proposed selection criteria for Reference Group participants are: Will be a Key User of the process and/or content being developed Currently recognised as a “go to” person within their teams Willing and able to take an active role in the Project Well respected and influential within their teams Good communication skills Positive attitude and open to change Quick learner It is recommended that at the end of the E&CM Project, the Reference Group for each Work Stream consider if there is value in continuing to meet as a “Community of Practice” from across the University. This would provide an ongoing opportunity to learn from each other’s experience, respond to issues or needs as they arise and drive continuous improvement. It could also provide a forum for identifying learning needs and providing updates or training as required. E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 15 of 21 3.6. Change Agents Change Agents may be identified for departments or Faculties that are significantly affected by the new E&CM solution and their role will be to focus on the people side of the change process, namely: Ensuring consistent messages and expectations are communicated in a way that resonates with their target audiences Monitoring the level of engagement of key stakeholders and updating the stakeholder management plan each month Assist in scheduling project activities for their Faculty/department to meet Project requirements and recognise competing demands Monitoring the effectiveness of the change management activities Working alongside Managers to support them in leading change within their teams, including the behavioural and mind-set shifts required (this may include co-ordination of a reward and recognition program) The Change Agent will be required to have an overall view of the project plan activities (including change management) and will be the chief contact point for the Change Manager. Change Agents are expected to participate in the following activities: 1. A Workshop at the commencement of each key stage of the E&CM Project (Design, Build & Test, Deploy) to review the planned E&CM Project activities, focus for the Change Agent role and provide an opportunity for practical application of relevant change management tools (e.g. benefits templates, mind-set shift, defining success from customer and staff perspective, momentum for change) 2. Monthly meetings with the Change Manager to monitor progress and update the change management plans , as required (including communications, stakeholder and training) 3. Review key communications intended for their departments and/or Faculty, as per the communications plan 4. Provide support and coaching to managers, as required The proposed selection criteria for Change Agents are: Working within a Department or Faculty that is significantly impacted by the proposed changes Well regarded within their Faculty/Department by both Senior Management and front line staff Willing and able to take an active role in the Project E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 16 of 21 Demonstrated leadership capability Good interpersonal skills, particularly listening and influencing Ideally, some training or facilitation experience Given the current scope of the E&CM Project, Change Agents from Faculties other than the Professions are only expected to participate in this capacity until the Design and Build Phases are completed. More than one Change Agent may be selected for an area, depending upon the size and scope of the teams affected and the capacity of the individuals to undertake the required activities of the role. Similarly, the change agent role may be allocated to Line Managers if they have the capacity and capability to undertake these activities. 3.7. Leadership Forums The “counter-culture” aspects of the Project will require a very strong top-down approach in which Executives communicate consistent messages and expectations for managers and employees to drive and implement the desired changes. This includes the need to implement an enterprise wide CRM platform, remove unnecessary variation in customer processes (that add no value) and strive to better understand, connect and serve customers. Active and visible executive sponsorship is a significant contributor to Project success. Involving them early and ensuring they are active and visible throughout the project will be a focus for the stakeholder management strategy. To take into account the capacity of Senior Executives, it is proposed that Pascale Quester, Leah Hill and Gary Martin form a sponsorship coalition to lead the E&CM Project. The role of the Sponsor is to: Demonstrate senor management’s ongoing commitment to the E&CM Project Deliver organisation level messages about why the change is needed and how it aligns with the University’s direction Communicate expectations and utilise accountability mechanisms for leaders Provide a role model and reward and recognise the desired behaviour and culture change Assist in the resolution of issues that threaten the success of the E&CM Project Managers of Marketing and Student Services and Administration staff will be a significant target audience because their change leadership capability may be tested by the scope and nature of the planned changes. They are also the preferred communicator of messages at the local level. These individuals will have a more significant role to play in terms of supporting their employees to adopt and accept the new procedures, recognising their achievements and preventing and/or eliminating work-arounds. E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 17 of 21 The project will utilise a number of ways to engage relevant management: 1. Regular, one-on-one meetings will be held with sponsors to provide updates and identify opportunities for visible and active participation in the change. 2. Direct consultation (by the Project Team/Change Agents) with Managers within the Faculties, departments and functions, as appropriate to the nature and content of the change (e.g. BAU management meetings, workshops or one-on-one meetings) 3. Instruction and clear expectations communicated via Executive Management, largely using the established meeting structures 4. Updating PDRs to reflect the Project objectives and change leadership expectations of managers 5. Feedback on the level of adoption and effectiveness of the new procedures through appropriate measures (as determined by the work stream teams). This information will support managers to manage the transition in terms of both employee attitudes and uptake of the new procedures. Managers’ role in engaging staff, defining expectations and encouraging change through formal reward and recognition are outlined below: 3.7.1. Engaging Staff and Defining Expectations Mangers are best placed to engage their staff in the change process and to support their individual transition. This process begins with their awareness of the nature of the changes, why they are necessary and the benefits they will deliver. Often communication strategies focus on the “telling” component of this engagement process. Whilst it is important to provide consistent organisational messages, it is equally important to discuss benefits of the Enquiry & Contact Management Project at a local level. Managers are best place to engage: their teams in identifying benefits for them, their customers and the University and how they can contribute to them individual staff via one-on-one discussions on how they perceive the changes, their pros and cons and “what’s in it for me?” There are two formal management mechanisms by which role and performance expectations are communicated, namely position descriptions and personal development reviews. Updating these documents to reflect both the contribution of individuals to successful project and position outcomes and to provide role clarity are important steps for managers. These tools provide both a short term focus and ongoing sustainability for the change process and their formality sends a clear signal to staff. E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 18 of 21 3.7.2. Reward & Recognition The “counter-culture” characteristics of developing a whole of University approach that responds to the needs, preference and expectations of customers will require strong management of change at multiple levels. A unified message from senior leaders and a consistent set of expectations for behaviour change will be essential to drive appropriate behaviour change. Student Support Officers/Enquiry Staff are a critical target audience for the proposed changes. These individuals will potentially feel they are being asked to do more work and take on more responsibility as they adopt new ways of working. Their Managers will have a critical role to play in encouraging and supporting their adoption of the new procedures. Reward and recognition are important levers to reinforce the new behaviours and attitudes associated with the planned changes. This will be critical in the period when employees and managers are testing out the new procedures and building their competence and confidence in the new system. It will also be an important mechanism through which leaders communicate what is valued moving forward and ought to be high profile to facilitate the culture change required. Teamwork across structural boundaries, putting the greater good for the University above local needs, tailoring services to a deep understanding of customers’ needs and delivering service excellence are noteworthy demonstrations of the desired culture. The specific behaviour changes indicative of the desired culture are described below: FROM TO Activity focus Outcome focus Point in time service excellence Proactively create value over time Act within span of control Shared ownership across boundaries Inside-out thinking Outside-in thinking Treat customers the same Treat customers differently based on need and value E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 19 of 21 Management may choose public or private forums for the ad hoc recognition of staff, depending on the circumstances and employee preferences. In addition, nomination for the DVCA Professional Staff Awards, culminating in an annual award (for individuals and teams) can provide a forum in which to showcase and celebrate the achievements of staff. 3.8. Customer Forums It is essential for the E&CM Project to model the changes it seeks to create and to respond to the voice of the customer as heard in the development of the Student e-Experience Strategy. This creates several opportunities: The induction process for each Work Stream team should include relevant criteria for a successful outcome, based on the student’s perspective expressed within the SeS Seeking design input/validation from customers for the development of the knowledgebase and E&CM processes 4. MONITORING AWARENESS, UNDERSTANDING AND BUY-IN In addition to on-going feedback and the monthly reviews of the stakeholder management plan, the success of the change management approach will be monitored through three principle mechanisms: 4.1. Formal Reviews with Key Stakeholders A mid-project review will be conducted with relevant management teams in each of the in-scope departments/Faculties. It is anticipated that this can be scheduled to coincide with regular meetings and will focus discussions on: What’s working? What’s not working? What’s missing? What’s working but adding no value? The outcome of these reviews will be used to adjust the change management approach as appropriate. E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 20 of 21 4.2. Surveys to Monitor Employee’s Awareness and Attitude to the Planned Changes These will be limited to the staff that are pivotal to the successful adoption of new work procedures and occur at three intervals: after the initial communication launch which will commence after the Investment Committee endorsement of the business case (expected early June) following the project team’s development of University procedures which will coincide with a Manager/SME communication to affected staff and publishing of draft documentation After training and prior to “Go Live” 4.3. Operational Metrics To support and encourage employees and managers to adopt the new procedures operational metrics will be made visible. This will allow the benefits to be tracked, monitor how quickly the transition is occurring and focus managers on the areas that need their support and direction. It is important that these metrics are framed in terms of the desired behaviour as well as the planned benefits for the change. Ideally these metrics would be available on a weekly basis during the transition period (anticipated to be 3 months or until the targets are achieved). These measures should be developed in consultation with the work stream teams to ensure they are meaningful and pragmatic to implement. It is recommended that baseline measures be established to demonstrate that benefits have been realised post-implementation. These near-term measures are expected to drive the benefits contained within the business case and may include: the number of enquiries, by type and channel % of enquiries that must be referred on for resolution Number of prospective student leads captured and % followed up Customer Satisfaction E&CM Project – Stakeholder Engagement Strategy Page 21 of 21