INSTRUCTIONS...
YOU NEED TO PUT IN YOUR BIRTH PLACE, TOWN AND STATE. ALSO, THE
DAY, MONTH AND YEAR OF YOUR BIRTH...You'll see where.
Place a 3 cent stamp in the upper right hand corner (but only within the margin
boundaries of the document !) of each page. Use red ink and place your rolled
thumb print...over the bottom corner of the stamp.
Then use a gold ink pen and "Print" your name :John-Doe; Smith; at an angle
across the face of the stamp.
Then, turn over each page of the document and place a 3 cent stamp in the Lower
Right Corner of each page and repeat the same procedure for your thumb print and
name as above.
Also, on the BACK of each page of the document, write the following phrase...
"Settlement Agreement"...to the left of the stamp in the center of the bottom of the
page.
The stamp, at approximately page 10, the last page of the first part of the initial
filing and on the same level as your signature line, and right before the Proof Of
Service page, will also be thumbprinted in red, and gold inked with your printed
name at an angle, but with this exception: try to sign your name on the line so that
the end of your written signature overlaps a bit into the stamp. You'll be
thumprinting into the stamp but the thumbprint will also overlap your signature a
bit. Remove all references to "3 cent stamp here" !
YOU WILL NEED A STATE CERTIFIED COPY OF YOUR BIRTH
CERTIFICATE TO FILE IN ALONG WITH THE DOCUMENT.
It will be Exhibit A...Place the BC after the last page of the filing and right before
the Proof Of Service page as an Exhibit and DON'T DO ANYTHING TO IT ! You'll
see there is appropriate wording at that point - use it.
This document may need to be massaged a bit because of email and platform
transmission problems. The pagination will probably self correct itself IF you delete
this first page of Instructions after you massage the document and before you print
it out. Hopefully that's the case !
1
1
3 cent stamp here
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ________
:John-Doe; Smith;
Petitioner / Grantor / Settlor
Of JOHN DOE SMITH
Case No. _______________
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
_______________________
Vs
UNITED STATES d/b/a CORPORATION,
Or STATE OF ________ d/b/a
CORPORATION
Fictitious Plaintiff
PETITION TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE
WITH FACTS AND LAW AND ORDER
FOR THE FEDERAL OR STATE
COMPTROLLER TO SETTLE THE
ALLEGED DEBT
NOW, COMES, The Petitioner, Grantor / Settlor :John–Doe; Smith; (hereinafter
Smith), one of the people on Massachusetts, and in this court of record, Presents a
PETITION TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE WITH FACTS AND LAW, AND AN
ORDER FOR THE FEDERAL OR STATE COMPTROLLER TO SETTLE THE
ALLEGED DEBT.
2
1
This Administrative Court and its Officers are aware that all prosecutorial offices
were formed under the Judiciary Act of 1789 when the inferior Courts (to the "one
supreme court") were created. This Administrative Court and its Court Officials are also
aware of the fact, in nature, that All judicial power in Law and Equity was amended on
Feb. 5, 1795 under the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution for the united States of
America, thereby removing all judicial power and prosecutorial power to hear any cases
based on claims of Law or Equity or even in controversy.
When the Eleventh Amendment removed the judicial power of the Courts it
removed it on both the Federal and State level Courts as well as prosecutorial powers in
both jurisdictions to proceed in any case in Law or Equity or even in controversies. That
same judicial and prosecution power taken from both Federal and State Courts, still,
however remained with the people of the united States, in the Bill of Rights. The people
retained this authority under Article III, Section 2 now making WE the People of the
Preamble, the "one supreme court," and the Court and Prosecution in all cases in common
law under the Articles / Amendments 7, 9, and 10. (See the Bill of Rights 7th, 9th and
10th under Amendments)
Amendment 7 - Trial by Jury in Civil Cases. Ratified 12/15/1791.
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed
twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact
tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United
States, than according to the rules of the common law
3
1
Amendment 9 - Construction of Constitution. Ratified 12/15/1791.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment 10 - Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to
the people.
The Administrative Court and its Officers are by lawful definition Federal
employees, under, among other factors, the Clearfield Doctrine, and are private
collection agencies for the UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT. At least,
this is what the People are led to believe by your own Codes, Rules, Regulations, etc.,
and settled law. If I am wrong correct me? You also know, being educated and
competent in the Law, that the Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1 states the following:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state
wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor
shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws”
4
1
The Supreme Court declared in the 1883, Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883),
that the UNITED STATES and State Legislatures can not create, enforce or abridge any
laws for or against a United States citizen. This affirms Title 42, Section 1981 "equal
protection as white citizens." The Fourteenth Amendment has given ALL races the same
standing in law as white citzens per Title 42, Section 1981.
The Administratitive Agencies, Administrative Courts and its Officers are aware
of the U.S. Statutes at Large, Vol. 48 of 1933 -1934, pages 1-112, and that in the State of
Emergency, declared in 1933, that all Gold and Silver and any money (currency) of value
was turned over to the United States Treasury and was to be placed in the Trust of The
Comptroller of Currency thereby making that office, (COC), a Trustee of Debt on the
Federal level and the State's Comptrollers on the lower case named state, to pay the all
caps name of the STATE Of ___________ or the Corporation of the DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA. The jurisdiction was defined in the survey track of the "metes and bounds"
that defined the all caps jurisdiction of the UNITED STATES within the "forty stones"
laid out around the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The names of the two, distinct
jurisdictions - that of the UNITED STATES and the de jure states from which the land
was taken - are on each portion of each stone which indicate jurisdiction.
Referring back to the Federal Comptroller of Currency - this office also handles
the discharge of debt for the all caps name - and fictional entity - such as JOHN DOE
SMITH (Property of the, all caps, UNITED STATES, and/or STATE OF _______
Corporation) to whom you charged with violations of ______________ .
5
1
The Petitioner is, now, giving you the opportunity to come back into honor and do
the right and lawful thing, as you are a Fiduciary Trustee of the Trust in the all caps
name of JOHN DOE SMITH. Because you are an Administrative Court and its officers
have failed to disclose all the parties involved (Comptroller of Currency, Court
Administrator to correct and balance the books) or others to be named to which was to be
given the disputed funds in this case, and have placed your offices in dishonor and have
made yourself an enemy of the Corporate Fictions, the “All “caps, STATE OF ________ /
UNITED STATES. It is time for the Petitioner, Smith, on behalf of JOHN DOE
SMITH, to correct the dishonor of your offices, and for Smith to effect the removal of
your office from the Enemy of the State list. I became the Grantor and Settlor of the Trust
created under the Statutes at Large, Vol. 48, 1933- 1934, pages 1- 112. I, therefore ,will
place into this Court an Order to correct this dispute and the dishonor that has come upon
this Administrative Court and its Officers, and me, by your neglect of duties or lack of
understanding of your job.
ORDER TO BE SIGNED
The Court ORDER will read as Such:
The Court of the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF _______ hereby Orders the Comptroller of
Currency of the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and / or the Ohio State Comptroller
to release the Funds of the Trust of the all caps name of JOHN DOE SMITH,
6
1
and, To Settle the claim brought by the all caps UNITED STATES / STATE OF
___________against the all caps name of JOHN DOE SMITH on behalf of the
Grantor / Settlor, upper and lower case name: :John–Doe: Smith; the living,
breathing Man....or Woman.
It is Also ORDERED that the Living Man :John–Doe; Smith; be (released from
prison and) made whole again, and that the all caps fictional entity JOHN DOE
SMITH be found - the last known whereabouts of this fictional entity was at the
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, DIVISON OF VITAL STATISTICS
which contains this information for JOHN DOE SMITH: Day of birth _____,
Month of birth_____, Year of birth ______, City or Town of birth
_______________, State of birth __________ - and that the fictional entity be
placed in custody. All disputed funds allegedly owed in the current complaint will
be paid by either the Federal Comptroller of Currency under the UNITED
STATES TREASURY or by the State of Ohio Comptroller as the last known
whereabouts of JOHN DOE SMITH was already stated to be at the OHIO
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, DIVISON OF VITAL STATISTIC according to
the above information.
So ORDERED by THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF _______ on this date of _______________ .
Payment is to be settled within 30 days of this Court ORDER.
7
1
______________________
Administrative Law Judge
The above example Order will be included with this filing to be placed on the
record as ORDER TO SETTLE DISPUTE.
The Petitioner, Smith is also forced to commence a further suit dealing with the
violations of Securities Fraud being committed by this court and is compelled by TITLE
18, § 4. Misprision of felony to report these crimes. It is a fact that this court is aware
that all cases, etc., are being converted to securities to be bought and sold on the stock
market (and other venues) by and through insurance companies, etc. Once the original
security note, bond, mortgage or document(s) is sold into the markets the only evidence
left is a copy of the original document. Those "copies" are placed before the
Administrative Courts by prosecutors and court officials are accepting these "copies" as a
true/original document. The Administrative Courts and its officers know that these are
"counterfeit" obligations and that forged and "counterfeit" documents are being placed
before this Administrative Court in order to "re-monetize" them which is illegal. The
real / original documents have already been placed into the securities exchange system
for trade and commerce, and assigned CUSIP numbers (Federal Government Code, State
code, County code, issuer, issue, check = Cusip Identifier). CUSIP numbers regulate the
selling of securities under the Securities Act. Once this is done the debt has been cleared
and discharged. For any prosecutor or Administrative Office to re-introduce these same,
8
1
now "counterfeit," securities before a court would be committing Fraud under 18 USC
471- 474(A). The penalties for these felony violations include up to 10-40 years in prison.
Also, these actions include the fraud of civil rights violations by bringing such claims
(suits) "in fraud" just so these counterfeit securities can be traded. These actions are
felonies and outright "securities fraud." This is also called stock market manipulation and
violate all applicable "anti-trust" laws. It is also a fact that the converted "copies" of these
securities by the courts also go through the State Comptroller and the Comptroller of
Currency of the United States to disperse the funds once they go through the money
laundering stage. Through this scheme, the Comptroller can now legally produce grant
money to the government. This is this Petitioner's short version of a very long story. This
applies on all cases including - IRS, MORTGAGES, CREDIT CARDS, CRIMINAL
CASES, TRAFFIC TICKETS, CHILD SERVICES, ETC. The Petitioner, Smith has
given this court, through this filing, a number of ways to settle this dispute and has
explained why the Administrative system has created a syntax, and statutory language,
fraud on the people, and why the Administrative Court refuses to clarify any language.
This is why the court returns rulings of "NOT WELL TAKEN" when a clarification of
language document, such as a Petition or Motion, comes before any court.
Further Argument
The Petitioner Smith; also points out a conflict concerning the flag flying in the
Courtroom. If it’s not the Constitutional Flag, is it a Military flag, and is it properly
proportioned and of regulation size as defined by the United States Code, Title 4, and
Army Regulation 840-10. Concerning the regulations, if the Flag flying doesn’t represent
9
1
either the Constitution or the Military, then it follows that it must be a flag of a Foreign
jurisdiction. The Question is: is it a Foreign flag? The next consideration: is Roman Law
and/or the Vatican influencing the court? This also brings the issue of separation of
church and State. The question is, is the Petitioner being forced into a fraudulent
confession under a Foreign flag by the Person acting as a judge, magistrate or a tribunal
in order to clear "Them self of their sins? If it isn't a Roman Civil flag under the influence
of the Vatican, and not a Constitutional flag or a Military flag, then what Foreign Flags
are flying and what jurisdiction is being declared in all the Courtrooms on sovereign
united States National soil?
CONCLUSION
The Petitioner, Smith, has set out the facts and Laws, and raised questions
concerning your commercial side, religious side, the Constitutional issues and statutory
regulations, and has offered a way to honorably settle this dispute against the all cap
name of JOHN DOE SMITH (Property of the all caps Corporation(s)). The UNITED
STATES or the STATE OF ___________ created the conflict in order to collect
fraudulent funds out of the Trust Fund, created under the U.S. Statutes, Vol. 48, 1933-34,
but now the Petitioner, Smith has clearly claimed. and invoked his Status as Grantor /
Settlor to settle this erroneous contract claim in Honor. This now affords Petitioner Smith
a 12(b)(6) remedy, and a potential remedy for you of your sins against the Truth and the
Petitioner, Smith, a Living Man. Or Woman.
1
0
1
"S .Luke [sic] CHAPTER 11
52 *[sic] Woe vnto you Lawyers: for ye haue taken away the key of
knowledge: ye entred not in your selues, and them that were entring in ,
ye ІІ [sic] hindred."
The Holy Bible King James Version: 1611 Edition by
Hendrickson Publishers, First Printing, Publisher's Edition October 2003 (No copyright).
_____________________________ 3 STAMP HERE
:John–Doe; Smith;
Exhibit A - Certified Birth Certificate of JOHN DOE SMITH as the next
unnumbered page and inserted after this page.
PROOF OF SERVICE
NOW, COMES, The Petitioner, Grantor / Settlor, :John–Doe; Smith; with a PETITION
TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE WITH FACTS AND LAW AND AN ORDER FOR
THE FEDERAL OR STATE COMPTROLLER TO SETTLE THE ALLEGED
1
1
1
DEBT before the Clerk Of Court of the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF _____________ on this day of ___________ the month
of _____________ in the year of our Lord 2010 A.D., and states that all parties of
interest have been served.
_____________________________
:John–Doe; Smith;
Cc to
3 cent stamp here
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ____________
:John–Doe; Smith;
1
2
1
Petitioner / Grantor / Settlor
Of JOHN DOE SMITH
Case No. ______________________
Vs
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
_______________________
UNITED STATES dba CORPORATION
OR STATE OF _________
Fictitious Plaintiff
ORDER TO SETTLE DISPUTE
The Court of the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF ____________ hereby ORDERS the Comptroller of the Currency of the
District of Columbia and / or the ________ State Comptroller to release the funds of the
Trust of the all caps name of JOHN DOE SMITH to Settle the claim brought by the all
caps UNITED STATES / STATE OF ___________ against the all caps name of JOHN
DOE SMITH, thereby Settling the dispute on behalf of the Grantor / Settlor, lower case
name, :John–Doe; Smith;, the Living Man Or women.
It is ALSO Ordered that the Living Man or Woman: :John–Doe; Smith; be
(released from prison and) made whole, and the all caps JOHN DOE SMITH (Property
of the all caps UNITED STATES and/or STATE OF _______ corporation) be found
at the last know whereabouts at the OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, DIVISON OF
VITAL STATISTICS which contains this information for JOHN DOE SMITH: Day of
birth ________, Month of birth________, Year of birth ______, City or Town of birth
1
3
1
_______________, State of birth __________ - and such "entity" be placed in custody.
All disputed funds will be paid by either the Federal Comptroller of Currency under the
UNITED STATES TREASURY or by the State of Ohio Comptroller, as the last known
whereabouts of the entity JOHN DOE SMITH was at the OHIO DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH, DIVISON OF VITAL STATISTICS and has been since approximately the
________day of, the ______ month of, and year of __________ .
So ORDERED, BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF ___________ . Payment is to be settled within 30 days of this Court
Order.
Date: ____________________
______________________
Administrative Law Judge
1
4
1