Agenda Item No:
NORTH LONDON WASTE AUTHORITY
REPORT TITLE:
‘STATE OF SEPARATION’ PAYMENT SCHEME
REPORT OF:
HEAD OF WASTE STRATEGY AND CONTRACTS
FOR SUBMISSION TO:
AUTHORITY MEETING
DATE:
24th June 2009
SUMMARY OF REPORT:
This report recommends the introduction of a new financial scheme that ensures
that constituent borough councils delivering waste to the Authority in a ‘state of
separation’ such that it is cheaper for the Authority to treat (e.g. recycling and
composting services) have that saving directly reimbursed to them, rather than it
being simply a saving to the Authority resulting in a lower levy and a saving
consequently shared by the other constituent borough councils.
It is particularly relevant to recycling and composting services contracted by the
Authority for separately collected wastes received from our constituent borough
councils.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Authority is recommended to:
i)
approve the introduction of the ‘state of separation’ payments scheme
as set out in this report from 1st April 2010; and
ii)
decide whether it wants to phase-in the introduction of the scheme as at
para 3.3 of this report.
Signed by Head of Waste Strategy
and Contracts
...............................................................
Date: ......................................................
1.0
OVERVIEW AND PRINCIPLES
1.1
When wastes are delivered by a Borough to the Authority in a ‘state of
separation’ for recycling or composting, the Authority saves money as this is
cheaper than the marginal cost of disposal of residual waste. At present all
such savings are effectively pooled between all seven Boroughs as they simply
result in an Authority levy that is lower than it would otherwise have been. The
levy is then apportioned in accordance with the default levy regulations and this
does not necessarily give Boroughs that have delivered waste in a ‘state of
separation’ an equitable share of the savings they have helped to achieve.
1.2
An alternative way of presenting this is to say that under the tonnage-based
default levy mechanism, every tonne of waste that a Borough delivers to the
Authority increases the share of the levy that that Borough must pay,
regardless of the relative cost of dealing with the different types of waste.
1.3
The proposed scheme is designed for the Authority to raise funds through the
levy on a more standardised basis so that it can then return to individual
Boroughs the savings that arise from their own recycling and composting
activities, by the Authority making payments to Boroughs for each tonne of
household waste delivered in a ‘state of separation’ (SoS payments).
1.4
As indicated above, because the Authority is a levying body, it must raise the
funds with which to make these payments; and given that no such payments
are made now, there is a one-off increase (other than future inflation and
tonnage growth) of introducing the SoS scheme in the year of change. This is
so that the savings that are currently being pooled through a lower levy can be
re-distributed to the Boroughs giving rise to them (i.e. Boroughs will have to
give up the share of the savings they have been enjoying through the pooled
levy that have arisen from other Boroughs’ recycling and composting).
1.5
Because of the ‘closed’ nature of the Authority’s finances and the financial
relationship with the Boroughs, in any one year individual Boroughs may find
themselves net beneficiaries (or not) relative to the current levy structure,
depending on whether they provide more savings to the Authority relative to
other Boroughs. A simplified illustrative model is at Appendix 1 to show the
principles.
1.6
However, the nature of the tonnage-element of the levy means that there is a
two-year time delay in Boroughs delivering to (or removing from) the Authority
any recyclable wastes and their share of the levy then changing. Those
Boroughs who continue to retain their recyclables for direct sale to the market
reap any savings directly, and their share of the levy is unaffected by such
wastes.
1.7
The system therefore significantly lessens the current injustices described
above, and as such it may be seen as a positive step towards the ‘menupricing’ approach envisaged by all in the Memorandum of Understanding
approved by all Boroughs and the Authority for the long-term procurement of
services from 2014.
1.8
The Authority’s power to introduce this scheme derives from amendments to
the Environmental Protection Act 1990 made by the Waste and Emissions
Trading Act 2003. The default levy regulations require the cost of the SoS
scheme to be raised through that part of the levy which is apportioned
according to each Borough’s proportion of the total Council Tax Band D
equivalent properties (as used for Boroughs’ own Council Tax setting
purposes) in the Authority’s area.
2.0
THE SCHEME IN PRACTICE
2.1
The proposed SoS payment scheme has been modelled to show how it would
have worked in 2007/08 (using full-year tonnage data) and 2008/09 (using
provisional year-end tonnage data from Borough Technical Officers), and how
it is expected to work in 2009/10 and 2010/11 using Borough Technical Officer
projections agreed in January 2009 and now used as the base for the 2009/10
approved budget and the 2010/11 – 2012/13 medium term budget forecasts
reported to the February 2009 meeting of the Authority.
2.2
The methodology for calculating the value of the SoS payments themselves
has been to first calculate the budgeted weighted average marginal cost of
disposal for residual waste in the year in question, using the full rate of the
landfill tax whilst residual waste tonnages exceed the available energy-fromwaste capacity under the main waste disposal contract. Then the various costs
of different recycling treatments are deducted from this first figure to establish
how much lower the Authority’s costs are as a result of the Borough delivering
waste to it in a state of separation. This is the saving to the Authority that is
currently resulting in a lower levy than would have prevailed had the Boroughs
delivered the same tonnages as mixed residual waste (Boroughs that do not
deliver their recyclables to the Authority benefit from a lower share of the levy).
2.3
There will be some exceptions as wastes subject to ‘producer responsibility’
will not attract an SoS payment as the Authority has no avoided cost; nonhousehold wastes will be excluded as the Borough will recover its costs from
its customers; and furniture wastes on which the Authority is paying a thirdparty recycling credit will also be excluded.
2.4
The net effect of these payments is shown for each of the modelled years in
Appendices 2-5 using the projections from Borough technical officers as
mentioned above (although collectively these have been overstated in the past,
with noteworthy variations between boroughs). The first three years effectively
show the impact of the proposed scheme in each case as if it were the year of
introduction in order to make explicit the relative outcomes of the current
system of effectively pooling savings across all seven Boroughs as opposed to
the proposed system of returning those savings to the Boroughs who gave rise
to them by delivering wastes in a state of separation.
2.5
The bases for apportioning the levy are set out in blue text, namely prevailing
Council Tax bases and the relevant year’s tonnage data. Alongside this in a
yellow shaded panel is each Borough’s share of the cost of raising the SoS
scheme budget, the value of the SoS payments they would receive and the net
impact relative to the current regime. Alongside this in a green shaded panel is
an exemplification for each Borough of the savings arising to them from their
own activities (net of the contribution already made through the levy) and the
savings from other Boroughs’ activities falling to them under the current levying
structure that they would forego under the SoS scheme.
2.6
It is most important to note however that every year is shown as if it were the
year of change when the impact is most felt. Thereafter, all tonnages will be
effectively levied at a more standardised rate, and savings arising initially to the
Authority when wastes are delivered to it by Boroughs in a state of separation
will be returned directly to those Boroughs. Members are reminded however
that potentially favourable short-term outcomes from transferring wastes to the
Authority should be set against the increased share of the levy that will follow
two years later.
2.7
This is most important in the context of a report later on this agenda that
recommends to the Authority the award of a contract for MRF services that has
just been tendered and which offers some £800,000 savings to the public
purse. The five Boroughs that have agreed to deliver their commingled
recyclables for this contract who have collectively thereby enabled these
economies of scale will want to benefit from the savings directly; otherwise they
may have been better served by letting five individual contracts even if these
were more expensive, but so long as they were lower than the cost of an extra
share of the levy. As residual waste costs increase further each year due
mostly to the Landfill Tax, this pressure will be ever-stronger.
2.8
It is also important to note that whilst the 20010/11 modeling incorporates
Camden’s recent decision to reduce the amount of commingled waste to be
delivered to the Authority from 2010/11, the decision of Enfield regarding its
tender for MRF services has not been taken at the time of finalising this report.
Consequently there is some additional modeling at Appendix 5.2 that illustrates
the SoS scheme if the Authority were no longer to receive any recyclable or
compostable wastes from Enfield in 2010/11; clearly however the section B
that illustrates the SoS scheme if absolutely all such wastes were delivered to
the Authority is unchanged.
3.0
INTRODUCTION OF THE SCHEME
3.1
With approval of Members, this SoS scheme can be introduced from 1st April
2010 as there is sufficient time for appropriate budget preparations at the
present. This will bring about the proposed improvements in fairness as
quickly as possible, and thereby deliver the savings particularly from the
proposed MRF services contract elsewhere on this agenda to the relevant
Boroughs.
3.2
As previously indicated, once the one-off effects of implementing the scheme
have been completed, the on-going position will be one in which the Authority’s
levy is raised on a much more flat basis per tonne, and the reduced costs of
those recycling and composting treatments that the Authority provides to some
Boroughs will be returned directly to them, rather than being shared by all
seven Boroughs through a lower levy.
3.3
Officers from some Boroughs have indicated a desire for this scheme to be
phased in so as to dampen its impact in the early years. If Members were so
minded, it would be possible to set the SoS payments rates per tonne (and
therefore the Authority’s budget requirement that will be raised through the
levy) at one third of their calculated value in the first year, two-thirds in the
second year and the full rate only in the third year and thereafter. This phasing
would be at the same as when the statutory default tonnage-based levy was
brought in, and as when the Authority’s local voluntary scheme phased out
recycling credits to the Boroughs. Clearly this would defer the adverse
financial impacts (relative to the current unrefined levy structure) on some
Boroughs, whilst also deferring the point from which other Boroughs receive
the full benefit of the lower costs to the Authority that arise from their collection
services.
4.0
FULL THEORETICAL IMPACT OF THE SOS PAYMENT SCHEME
4.1
The SoS scheme has been set out above to show the impact using Borough
technical officer tonnage projections, and reflecting the current distribution of
services whereby individual Boroughs deliver all or some of their collected
recyclable and compostable wastes to the Authority for treatment. This is
shown in section A of Appendices 2-5, with additional modelling at 5.2 to reflect
the points made at para 2.8 above.
4.2
Additional modelling has also been done to show what the impacts of the
scheme might be if ALL recyclable municipal wastes in North London were
delivered to the Authority for treatment. This represents the hypothetical
situation of relevant Boroughs cancelling or varying contracts they have
already awarded through to 2014 that commit their recyclable wastes to their
own contractor (i.e. they are currently managed and funded wholly outside of
the NLWA and the levy); of all Borough contracts relating to bring-banks being
similarly cancelled or varied; and the same again for all Borough contracts in
relation to any separate contracts for CA-site recyclables. This is shown in
section B of Appendices 2-5.
4.3
A key difference under this scenario is that some Boroughs would then be
delivering to the Authority recyclable wastes that not only have a lower cost of
treatment than residual waste, but which actually have a positive sale value.
This would consequently require much higher SoS payments for such wastes
to reflect the fact that, as above, these wastes by being delivered to the
Authority would attract a higher share of the levy (which is blind to different
treatment costs), but would in fact give the Authority an immediate income
stream.
4.4
Therefore the overall budget for SoS payments would have to be
correspondingly higher, and the Boroughs delivering wastes of a positive value
(and thereby the greatest savings) would receive a higher proportion of the
total SoS payments. This would be entirely logical and fair as they would also
as a direct consequence become liable for a higher share of the tonnagebased levy and lose a direct income stream of their own from the recyclables
they used to sell themselves (or through their direct contractor).
4.5
The net differences in each year are brought together for ease of reference at
Appendix 6, although it should be noted again that each year is shown as if it
were the year of change. The ongoing effect would be as at para 2.6 above,
with the net effect of all tonnages being levied at a more standardised rate, and
a two-year time lag between Boroughs firstly transferring tonnages to the
Authority and receiving an SoS payment (the budget for which must be raised
according to relevant council tax proportions) and secondly Boroughs
becoming liable for a correspondingly increased share of the tonnage-based
component of the levy.
5.0
CONCLUSION
5.1
The proposed SoS scheme is designed to reduce an injustice within the current
default levy mechanism that creates a financial disincentive for individual
Boroughs to have their recyclable and compostable wastes treated through the
Authority, even where there are demonstrable economies of scale.
5.2
The scheme is designed to operate within the default levy mechanism, and
therefore issues that arise from the two-year time-lag between increased
tonnages being delivered to the Authority and relevant Boroughs bearing a
correspondingly higher share of the levy remain.
5.3
Only the full ‘menu pricing’ proposals contained within the Memorandum of
Understanding approved by all Boroughs and the Authority for the long-term
procurement of new facilities and services after 2014 can overcome these
issues in full. Their introduction however will require unanimous agreement by
the Authority’s seven constituent borough councils as they commit to a range
of new obligations and benefits that will arise through the new contracted
services and the Inter-Authority Agreement that will then prevail.
6.0
RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1
The Authority is recommended to:
i)
approve the introduction of the ‘state of separation’ payments scheme
as set out in this report from 1st April 2010; and
ii)
decide whether it wants to phase-in the introduction of the scheme as
at para 3.3 of this report.
7.0
COMMENTS OF THE LEGAL ADVISER
7.1
The Legal Adviser has reviewed the report and has no comments to add.
8.0
COMMENTS OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISER
8.1
Whilst the levy mechanism is a legitimate method for apportioning the costs of
the NLWA in the delivery of its statutory waste obligations the same is not
necessarily true of the recycling treatment services that are provided by the
Authority. Although constituent boroughs have a duty to deliver their
residual waste to the Authority this is not the case in respect of separated
wastes which are capable of being recycled. Whilst all boroughs have agreed
the principle of sending their recyclates to the Authority for treatment (North
London Joint Waste Strategy), some boroughs have indicated that they are
concerned about the potential financial impact of doing so compared
with making their own treatment arrangements. The proposed State of
Separation (SoS) payment scheme is intended to redress the balance and to
go some way in ensuring that borough's sending their recyclates to
the Authority for treatment are not disadvantaged by the levy charging
mechanism.
8.2
Given that the Authority is already processing in excess of 100,000 tonnes of
recyclates there would be a significant increase in the Authority's budget and
levy in the year of change, e.g. for 2010/11 the budget and therefore the
levy could increase by £5m to £6m depending upon whether or not Enfield
continue to deliver their recyclates to the Authority. Thereafter, the increase
would depend upon the rate of change in the amount and type of recyclates
that are sent to the Authority. Although all boroughs would bear a share of the
increased cost in accordance with the levy apportionment arrangements for the
year in question the net financial impact on each borough would depend upon
the amount and type of recyclates that the boroughs send to the Authority for
treatment. On the basis of existing and projected borough tonnages as
summarised under scenario A (Appendix 5.2) the figures indicate that for
2010/11, after taking into account each borough’s eligibility and payment
under the SoS payment scheme, four boroughs would be disadvantaged
compared with the existing levy apportionment mechanism (with the Enfield
tonnages) reducing to three boroughs if Enfield decide to manage the
treatment of their own recyclates in 2010/11.
8.3
The rate of change in moving from scenario A to B will also change the net
financial impact on individual boroughs from year-to-year. Individual borough's
relative positions within the SOS regime will therefore always remain sensitive
to changes in the delivery by other boroughs of wastes (quantities and types)
to the Authority in a state of separation. Although the impact of a move
to scenario B is summarised in the Appendices, the modelling that underpins
this exemplification does not take into account the increased share of the levy
that each borough would incur by moving more recyclates to the Authority for
treatment (a borough's share of the levy would increase two years later, e.g. an
increase in the recyclates sent to the Authority in 2010/11 would not impact on
the levy apportionment until 2012/13). It is understood that not all boroughs
are in a position to transfer all of their recyclates to the Authority and therefore
it is possible that the potential financial impacts of Scenario B may not arise in
the medium term.
Local Government Act 1972 – Access to information
Documents used:
Environmental Protection Act 1990
Waste and Emissions Trading Act 2003
North London Joint Waste Strategy, June 2008
Contact Officers:
Andrew Lappage, Head of Waste Strategy & Contracts
&
Barbara Herridge, Policy & Development Manager
North London Waste Authority
Unit 169, Block 1B
Lee Valley Technopark, Ashley Road
N17 9LN
Tel: 020 8489 5730
Fax: 020 8365 0254
E-mail: post@nlwa.gov.uk
APPENDIX 1
SoS Payments - Simplified illustrative model
Residual Waste
Commingled Recyclables
Pre-sorted Recyclables
£60 /tne
£40 /tne
-£30 /tne
SoS:
SoS:
£20
£90
Current Methodology
Total
Waste
000's tpa
Borough A
Residual
Waste
000's tpa
100
Borough B
100
Total to NLWA
200
70
70
Recyclable Delivered
Waste
to NLWA
000's tpa
30
commingled
30
pre-sorted
Cost to
NLWA
£000's
Tonnage-based
Recovery from Borough
Borough
loss / gain
£000's
£000's
70
30
100
£4,200
£1,200
£5,400
£5,647
-£247
70
0
£4,200
£3,953
£247
170
£9,600
£9,600
£20
£5,400
£600
£6,000
£6,000
£0
£4,200
£4,200
£0
£10,200
£10,200
SoS Payments to borough delivering commingled to NLWA
Borough A
Borough B
Current costs
Plus SoS
30
Current costs
Total to NLWA
0
SoS Payments to both boroughs (NLWA receives commingled & pre-sorted wastes)
Borough A
Borough B
Income to NLWA
Total to NLWA
Current costs
Plus SoS commingled
Current costs
Plus SoS pre-sorted
Plus SoS
30
30
30
£20
£90
-£30
0
£5,400
£600
£6,000
£6,000
£0
£4,200
£2,700
-£900
£6,000
£6,000
£0
£12,000
£12,000
It is proposed that the NLWA's budget for SoS Payments is raised through the Council
Tax part of the levy.
SOS Payments for 2007- 08 Authority Meeting June 09
Date:
14-Jun-09
Analysis of Effects of SOS Payments 2007-08
A)
For recyclable wastes as delivered to NLWA in 2007/08
TOTAL
Band D Equivalent
properties:
2007/08
COUNCIL
TAX BASE
BARNET
CAMDEN
ENFIELD
HACKNEY
HARINGEY
ISLINGTON
WALTHAM F
B)
HOUSEHOLD WASTE
ELEMENT
BOROUGH %
NLWA C-TAX
BASE
2005/06
HOUSEHOLD
TONNAGES
HOUSEHOLD
TONNAGE
66.6%
COUNCIL TAX
YEAR 2
33.4%
OTHER
COUNCILTAX
ELEMENT
100%
LEVY
Without any SOS Levy Share for
payment
SoS Budget
Value of SoS
Payments
Net Cost to
Borough
Net Difference
135,345.00
92,250.00
108,068.00
68,563.00
84,468.00
82,597.19
74,506.00
20.96%
14.28%
16.73%
10.62%
13.08%
12.79%
11.54%
113,975
80,027
88,697
87,657
86,801
74,081
77,222
£3,481,377
£2,444,432
£2,709,258
£2,677,491
£2,651,344
£2,262,811
£2,358,753
£1,953,402
£1,331,422
£1,559,720
£989,554
£1,219,107
£1,192,106
£1,075,328
£1,465,977
£999,198
£1,170,529
£742,634
£914,908
£894,644
£807,005
£6,900,757
£4,775,052
£5,439,507
£4,409,679
£4,785,359
£4,349,561
£4,241,086
£92,765
£63,228
£74,069
£46,993
£57,894
£56,612
£51,066
£6,993,522
£4,838,280
£5,513,576
£4,456,672
£4,843,253
£4,406,173
£4,292,152
-£14,415
-£40,438
£0
-£13,628
-£154,980
-£214,638
-£4,527
£6,979,107
£4,797,841
£5,513,576
£4,443,043
£4,688,273
£4,191,534
£4,287,625
-£78,350
-£22,789
-£74,069
-£33,365
£97,086
£158,027
-£46,539
645,797.19
100.00%
608,460
£18,585,466
£9,320,639
£6,994,895
£34,901,000
£442,627
£35,343,627
-£442,627
£34,901,000
-£0
For all wastes collected for recycling by boroughs in 2007/08 - AS IF DELIVERED TO NLWA (ALTHOUGH NOT DONE AT PRESENT)
TOTAL
Band D Equivalent
HOUSEHOLD WASTE
properties:
ELEMENT
OTHER
LEVY
Without any SOS Levy Share for
payment
SoS Budget
2007/08
BOROUGH %
2005/06
HOUSEHOLD COUNCIL TAX
COUNCILTAX
COUNCIL
NLWA C-TAX
HOUSEHOLD
TONNAGE
YEAR 2
ELEMENT
TAX BASE
BASE
TONNAGES
66.6%
33.4%
100%
BARNET
CAMDEN
ENFIELD
HACKNEY
HARINGEY
ISLINGTON
WALTHAM F
Marginal Basis SOS payment to each borough compared to the share of the costs that each
borough must pay towards the SOS payments for each borough (including themselves)
Revised Levy
Due
Barnet
Camden
Enfield
Hackney
Haringey
Islington
Waltham F
£11,394
-£2,059
-£2,412
-£1,530
-£1,885
-£1,844
-£1,663
-£8,475
£34,662
-£6,767
-£4,293
-£5,289
-£5,172
-£4,665
£0
£0
£0
£0
£0
£0
£0
-£2,856
-£1,947
-£2,281
£12,181
-£1,783
-£1,743
-£1,572
-£32,480
-£22,138
-£25,934
-£16,454
£134,709
-£19,822
-£17,880
-£44,984
-£30,660
-£35,918
-£22,788
-£28,074
£187,186
-£24,763
-£949
-£647
-£758
-£481
-£592
-£579
£4,005
-£78,350
-£22,789
-£74,069
-£33,365
£97,086
£158,027
-£46,539
Marginal Basis SOS payment to each borough compared to the share of the costs that each
borough must pay towards the SOS payments for each borough (including themselves)
Revised Levy
Due
Value of SoS
Payments
Net Cost to
Borough
Net Difference
135,345.00
92,250.00
108,068.00
68,563.00
84,468.00
82,597.19
74,506.00
20.96%
14.28%
16.73%
10.62%
13.08%
12.79%
11.54%
113,975
80,027
88,697
87,657
86,801
74,081
77,222
£3,481,377
£2,444,432
£2,709,258
£2,677,491
£2,651,344
£2,262,811
£2,358,753
£1,953,402
£1,331,422
£1,559,720
£989,554
£1,219,107
£1,192,106
£1,075,328
£1,465,977
£999,198
£1,170,529
£742,634
£914,908
£894,644
£807,005
£6,900,757
£4,775,052
£5,439,507
£4,409,679
£4,785,359
£4,349,561
£4,241,086
£1,664,306
£1,134,377
£1,328,887
£843,103
£1,038,683
£1,015,678
£916,183
£8,565,062
£5,909,429
£6,768,394
£5,252,782
£5,824,042
£5,365,239
£5,157,268
-£2,205,005
-£701,122
-£737,725
-£1,133,921
-£572,793
-£561,841
-£2,028,810
£6,360,057
£5,208,307
£6,030,669
£4,118,860
£5,251,249
£4,803,398
£3,128,459
£540,699
-£433,255
-£591,162
£290,818
-£465,890
-£453,838
£1,112,627
645,797.19
100.00%
608,460
£18,585,466
£9,320,639
£6,994,895
£34,901,000
£7,941,216
£42,842,216
-£7,941,216
£34,901,000
£0
Barnet
Camden
Enfield
Hackney
Haringey
Islington
Waltham F
£1,742,884
-£314,978
-£368,987
-£234,101
-£288,407
-£282,019
-£254,393
-£146,940
£600,969
-£117,326
-£74,437
-£91,704
-£89,673
-£80,889
-£154,611
-£105,382
£614,274
-£78,323
-£96,492
-£94,355
-£85,112
-£237,645
-£161,977
-£189,751
£1,013,535
-£148,313
-£145,028
-£130,821
-£120,045
-£81,822
-£95,852
-£60,812
£497,874
-£73,260
-£66,084
-£117,750
-£80,257
-£94,019
-£59,650
-£73,487
£489,981
-£64,820
-£425,194
-£289,809
-£339,502
-£215,395
-£265,361
-£259,484
£1,794,745
£540,699
-£433,255
-£591,162
£290,818
-£465,890
-£453,838
£1,112,627
APPENDIX 2
SOS Payments for 2008-09 - Authority Meeting June 09
Date:
14-Jun-09
Analysis of Effects of SOS Payments 2008-09
A)
For recyclable wastes as delivered to NLWA in 2008-09
HOUSEHOLD
ELEMENT
Band D Equivalent properties:
2008/09
COUNCIL
TAX BASE
BARNET
CAMDEN
ENFIELD
HACKNEY
HARINGEY
ISLINGTON
WALTHAM F
(TONNAGE)
BOROUGH %
NLWA C-TAX
BASE
2006/07
HOUSEHOLD
TONNAGES
100%
OTHER
ELEMENT
(COUNCIL TAX)
100%
TOTAL
LEVY
Without any SOS
payment
Levy Share for
SoS Budget
Revised Levy Due
Value of SoS
Payments
Net Cost to
Borough
Net Difference
135,944.00
93,580.00
108,354.00
70,173.00
85,056.00
83,426.80
75,214.00
20.86%
14.36%
16.63%
10.77%
13.05%
12.80%
11.54%
122,480
80,171
86,174
91,435
92,804
79,892
78,630
£6,191,132
£4,052,492
£4,355,933
£4,621,866
£4,691,066
£4,038,389
£3,974,598
£1,231,379
£847,647
£981,469
£635,626
£770,436
£755,679
£681,288
£7,422,511
£4,900,139
£5,337,402
£5,257,492
£5,461,502
£4,794,068
£4,655,886
£384,139
£264,430
£306,178
£198,289
£240,344
£235,740
£212,533
£7,806,650
£5,164,569
£5,643,580
£5,455,781
£5,701,846
£5,029,808
£4,868,419
-£163,019
-£212,519
-£428,117
-£143,353
-£309,785
-£353,570
-£231,292
£7,643,631
£4,952,051
£5,215,463
£5,312,428
£5,392,061
£4,676,238
£4,637,127
-£221,120
-£51,912
£121,939
-£54,936
£69,441
£117,830
£18,759
651,747.80
100.00%
631,586
£31,925,476
£5,903,524
£37,829,000
£1,841,654
£39,670,654
-£1,841,654
£37,829,000
-£0
For all wastes collected for recycling by boroughs in 2008-09 - AS IF DELIVERED TO NLWA (ALTHOUGH NOT DONE AT PRESENT)
HOUSEHOLD
OTHER
ELEMENT
ELEMENT
TOTAL
Band D Equivalent properties:
(TONNAGE)
(COUNCIL TAX)
LEVY
Without any SOS
Levy Share for
payment
SoS Budget
Revised Levy Due
2008/09
BOROUGH %
2006/07
100%
100%
COUNCIL
NLWA C-TAX
HOUSEHOLD
TAX BASE
BASE
TONNAGES
Marginal Basis SOS payment to each borough compared to the share of the costs that
each borough must pay towards the SOS payments for each borough (including
themselves)
Barnet
Camden
Enfield
Hackney
Haringey
Islington
Waltham F
£129,016
-£23,407
-£27,102
-£17,552
-£21,275
-£20,867
-£18,813
-£44,328
£182,005
-£35,332
-£22,882
-£27,735
-£27,203
-£24,525
-£89,298
-£61,470
£356,942
-£46,095
-£55,871
-£54,801
-£49,406
-£29,901
-£20,583
-£23,833
£127,918
-£18,708
-£18,350
-£16,543
-£64,616
-£44,480
-£51,502
-£33,354
£269,356
-£39,654
-£35,750
-£73,749
-£50,767
-£58,782
-£38,069
-£46,142
£308,311
-£40,803
-£48,244
-£33,210
-£38,453
-£24,903
-£30,185
-£29,606
£204,600
-£221,120
-£51,912
£121,939
-£54,936
£69,441
£117,830
£18,759
B)
BARNET
CAMDEN
ENFIELD
HACKNEY
HARINGEY
ISLINGTON
WALTHAM F
Value of SoS
Payments
Net Cost to
Borough
135,944.00
93,580.00
108,354.00
70,173.00
85,056.00
83,426.80
75,214.00
20.86%
14.36%
16.63%
10.77%
13.05%
12.80%
11.54%
122,480
80,171
86,174
91,435
92,804
79,892
78,630
£6,191,132
£4,052,492
£4,355,933
£4,621,866
£4,691,066
£4,038,389
£3,974,598
£1,231,379
£847,647
£981,469
£635,626
£770,436
£755,679
£681,288
£7,422,511
£4,900,139
£5,337,402
£5,257,492
£5,461,502
£4,794,068
£4,655,886
£1,883,262
£1,296,384
£1,501,052
£972,122
£1,178,299
£1,155,730
£1,041,956
£9,305,773
£6,196,523
£6,838,454
£6,229,614
£6,639,801
£5,949,798
£5,697,842
-£2,596,045
-£1,008,980
-£1,064,735
-£1,156,239
-£576,134
-£653,803
-£1,972,869
£6,709,728
£5,187,543
£5,773,719
£5,073,375
£6,063,668
£5,295,995
£3,724,973
651,747.80
100.00%
631,586
£31,925,476
£5,903,524
£37,829,000
£9,028,805
£46,857,805
-£9,028,805
£37,829,000
Net Difference
Marginal Basis SOS payment to each borough compared to the share of the costs that
each borough must pay towards the SOS payments for each borough (including
themselves)
Barnet
Camden
Enfield
Hackney
Haringey
Islington
Waltham F
£712,783 £2,054,552 -£372,748 -£431,596 -£279,513 -£338,795 -£332,306
-£299,593
-£287,404 -£210,457
£864,108 -£167,744 -£108,636 -£131,676 -£129,154
-£116,440
-£436,317 -£222,086 -£152,878
£887,721 -£114,639 -£138,953 -£136,291
-£122,874
£184,117 -£241,173 -£166,016 -£192,226 £1,031,748 -£150,894 -£148,004
-£133,434
-£602,166 -£120,172
-£82,723
-£95,783
-£62,032
£500,946
-£73,748
-£66,488
-£501,927 -£136,373
-£93,875 -£108,696
-£70,394
-£85,324
£570,113
-£75,451
£930,913 -£411,508 -£283,271 -£327,992 -£212,417 -£257,468 -£252,537 £1,745,193
£0
£712,783
-£287,404
-£436,317
£184,117
-£602,166
-£501,927
£930,913
APPENDIX 3
SOS Payments for 2009-10 - Authority Meeting June 09
Date:
14-Jun-09
Analysis of Effects of SOS Payments 2009-10
Plus new MRF contract
A)
For recyclable wastes as projected to be delivered to NLWA in 2009/10
TOTAL
Band D Equivalent properties:
2009/10
COUNCIL
TAX BASE
BARNET
CAMDEN
ENFIELD
HACKNEY
HARINGEY
ISLINGTON
WALTHAM F
BOROUGH %
NLWA C-TAX
BASE
2007/08
HOUSEHOLD
TONNAGES
TONNAGE
ELEMENT
COUNCILTAX
ELEMENT
LEVY
Without any SOS
payment
Levy Share for
SoS Budget
Revised Levy Due
Value of SoS
Payments
Net Cost to
Borough
Net Difference
136,605
94,100
109,240
71,749
85,060
84,262
75,803
20.80%
14.33%
16.63%
10.92%
12.95%
12.83%
11.54%
122,406
78,097
82,890
83,405
95,552
79,553
75,280
£6,977,068
£4,451,482
£4,724,680
£4,754,034
£5,446,406
£4,534,473
£4,290,914
£1,761,160
£1,213,171
£1,408,361
£925,014
£1,096,624
£1,086,336
£977,279
£8,738,228
£5,664,652
£6,133,041
£5,679,048
£6,543,030
£5,620,808
£5,268,193
£943,916
£650,214
£754,828
£495,773
£587,749
£582,235
£523,785
£9,682,143
£6,314,866
£6,887,869
£6,174,820
£7,130,779
£6,203,043
£5,791,978
-£406,712
-£655,159
-£948,742
-£325,744
-£863,315
-£849,770
-£489,058
£9,275,431
£5,659,707
£5,939,127
£5,849,076
£6,267,464
£5,353,274
£5,302,921
-£537,203
£4,945
£193,913
-£170,028
£275,566
£267,535
-£34,727
656,819
100.00%
617,183
£35,179,057
£8,467,943
£43,647,000
£4,538,499
£48,185,499
-£4,538,499
£43,647,000
-£0
For all wastes to be collected for recycling by boroughs in 2009/10 - AS IF DELIVERED TO NLWA (ALTHOUGH NOT DONE AT PRESENT)
TOTAL
Band D Equivalent properties:
LEVY
Without any SOS
Levy Share for
payment
SoS Budget
Revised Levy Due
2009/10
BOROUGH %
2007/08
TONNAGE
COUNCILTAX
COUNCIL
NLWA C-TAX HOUSEHOLD
ELEMENT
ELEMENT
TAX BASE
BASE
TONNAGES
Marginal Basis SOS payment to each borough compared to the share of the costs that
each borough must pay towards the SOS payments for each borough (including
themselves)
Barnet
Camden
Enfield
Hackney
Haringey
Islington
Waltham F
£322,124
-£58,268
-£67,643
-£44,428
-£52,670
-£52,176
-£46,938
-£136,260
£561,297 -£108,964
-£71,568
-£84,845
-£84,049
-£75,611
-£197,319 -£135,923
£790,950 -£103,638 -£122,865 -£121,712
-£109,494
-£67,748
-£46,668
-£54,177
£290,161
-£42,185
-£41,789
-£37,594
-£179,552 -£123,684 -£143,584
-£94,306
£751,513 -£110,753
-£99,635
-£176,735 -£121,743 -£141,331
-£92,826 -£110,048
£740,754
-£98,071
-£101,714
-£70,065
-£81,338
-£53,423
-£63,334
-£62,740
£432,616
-£537,203
£4,945
£193,913
-£170,028
£275,566
£267,535
-£34,727
B)
BARNET
CAMDEN
ENFIELD
HACKNEY
HARINGEY
ISLINGTON
WALTHAM F
Value of SoS
Payments
Net Cost to
Borough
136,605
94,100
109,240
71,749
85,060
84,262
75,803
20.80%
14.33%
16.63%
10.92%
12.95%
12.83%
11.54%
122,406
78,097
82,890
83,405
95,552
79,553
75,280
£6,977,068
£4,451,482
£4,724,680
£4,754,034
£5,446,406
£4,534,473
£4,290,914
£1,761,160
£1,213,171
£1,408,361
£925,014
£1,096,624
£1,086,336
£977,279
£8,738,228
£5,664,652
£6,133,041
£5,679,048
£6,543,030
£5,620,808
£5,268,193
£2,473,114
£1,703,598
£1,977,695
£1,298,953
£1,539,937
£1,525,490
£1,372,347
£11,211,342
£7,368,251
£8,110,735
£6,978,001
£8,082,967
£7,146,298
£6,640,541
-£2,691,338
-£1,567,215
-£1,478,448
-£1,549,988
-£1,168,315
-£1,167,924
-£2,267,907
£8,520,004
£5,801,036
£6,632,287
£5,428,013
£6,914,652
£5,978,374
£4,372,634
656,819
100.00%
617,183
£35,179,057
£8,467,943
£43,647,000
£11,891,135
£55,538,135
-£11,891,135
£43,647,000
Net Difference
Marginal Basis SOS payment to each borough compared to the share of the costs that
each borough must pay towards the SOS payments for each borough (including
themselves)
Barnet
Camden
Enfield
Hackney
Haringey
Islington
Waltham F
£218,224 £2,131,595 -£385,578 -£447,615 -£293,994 -£348,536 -£345,266
-£310,605
-£136,383 -£325,949 £1,342,686 -£260,654 -£171,198 -£202,959 -£201,055
-£180,871
-£499,247 -£307,487 -£211,812 £1,232,558 -£161,501 -£191,463 -£189,667
-£170,627
£251,035 -£322,366 -£222,061 -£257,789 £1,380,672 -£200,728 -£198,845
-£178,883
-£371,622 -£242,986 -£167,380 -£194,310 -£127,623 £1,017,015 -£149,881
-£134,834
-£357,566 -£242,904 -£167,324 -£194,245 -£127,581 -£151,250 £1,018,093
-£134,789
£895,559 -£471,678 -£324,914 -£377,191 -£247,740 -£293,701 -£290,945 £2,006,169
-£0
£218,224
-£136,383
-£499,247
£251,035
-£371,622
-£357,566
£895,559
APPENDIX 4
SOS Payments for 2010-11 - Authority Meeting June 09
Date:
Reduced Tonnes from Camden in 2010/11
Plus new MRF contract
Analysis of Effects of SOS Payments 2010-11
A)
14-Jun-09
For recyclable wastes as projected to be delivered to NLWA in 2010/11
TOTAL
Band D Equivalent properties:
2009/10
COUNCIL
TAX BASE
BARNET
CAMDEN
ENFIELD
HACKNEY
HARINGEY
ISLINGTON
WALTHAM F
BOROUGH %
NLWA C-TAX
BASE
PROVISIONAL
2008/09
HOUSEHOLD
TONNAGES
TONNAGE
ELEMENT
COUNCILTAX
ELEMENT
LEVY
Without any SOS
payment
Levy Share for
SoS Budget
Revised Levy Due
Value of SoS
Payments
Net Cost to
Borough
Net Difference
136,605
94,100
109,240
71,749
85,060
84,262
75,803
20.80%
14.33%
16.63%
10.92%
12.95%
12.83%
11.54%
117,890
65,478
107,185
77,259
100,381
72,017
89,019
£7,936,974
£4,408,323
£7,216,257
£5,201,482
£6,758,176
£4,848,563
£5,993,226
£1,778,850
£1,225,356
£1,422,507
£934,305
£1,107,639
£1,097,247
£987,095
£9,715,824
£5,633,679
£8,638,764
£6,135,786
£7,865,815
£5,945,810
£6,980,322
£1,258,590
£866,977
£1,006,467
£661,049
£783,688
£776,336
£698,400
£10,974,414
£6,500,656
£9,645,231
£6,796,835
£8,649,503
£6,722,146
£7,678,722
-£737,560
-£786,256
-£1,290,102
-£441,144
-£1,159,244
-£952,463
-£684,738
£10,236,854
£5,714,400
£8,355,129
£6,355,692
£7,490,259
£5,769,683
£6,993,984
-£521,030
-£80,721
£283,635
-£219,905
£375,556
£176,127
-£13,662
656,819
100.00%
629,229
£42,363,000
£8,553,000
£50,916,000
£6,051,507
£56,967,507
-£6,051,507
£50,916,000
-£0
2010/11 C-Tax
will be used
Marginal Basis SOS payment to each borough compared to the share of the costs that
each borough must pay towards the SOS payments for each borough (including
themselves)
Barnet
Camden
Enfield
Hackney
Haringey
Islington
Waltham F
£584,163 -£105,667 -£122,669
-£80,569
-£95,516
-£94,620
-£85,121
-£163,525
£673,612 -£130,768
-£85,888 -£101,822 -£100,867
-£90,741
-£268,315 -£184,828 £1,075,537 -£140,927 -£167,072 -£165,505
-£148,890
-£91,749
-£63,201
-£73,370
£392,954
-£57,129
-£56,593
-£50,912
-£241,099 -£166,081 -£192,802 -£126,632 £1,009,118 -£148,717
-£133,787
-£198,093 -£136,456 -£158,411 -£104,044 -£123,347
£830,273
-£109,923
-£142,412
-£98,100 -£113,883
-£74,799
-£88,676
-£87,844
£605,713
-£521,030
-£80,721
£283,635
-£219,905
£375,556
£176,127
-£13,662
2010/11 C-Tax will
be used
B)
For all wastes to be collected for recycling by boroughs in 2010/11 - AS IF DELIVERED TO NLWA (ALTHOUGH NOT DONE AT PRESENT)
TOTAL
Band D Equivalent properties:
LEVY
PROVISIONAL
Without any SOS
Levy Share for
2008/09
payment
SoS Budget
Revised Levy Due
2009/10
BOROUGH %
TONNAGE
COUNCILTAX
COUNCIL
NLWA C-TAX
HOUSEHOLD
ELEMENT
ELEMENT
TAX BASE
BASE
TONNAGES
BARNET
CAMDEN
ENFIELD
HACKNEY
HARINGEY
ISLINGTON
WALTHAM F
136,605
94,100
109,240
71,749
85,060
84,262
75,803
20.80%
14.33%
16.63%
10.92%
12.95%
12.83%
11.54%
117,890
65,478
107,185
77,259
100,381
72,017
89,019
£7,936,974
£4,408,323
£7,216,257
£5,201,482
£6,758,176
£4,848,563
£5,993,226
656,819
100.00%
629,229
£42,363,000
2010/11 C-Tax
will be used
Value of SoS
Payments
Net Cost to
Borough
£1,778,850
£1,225,356
£1,422,507
£934,305
£1,107,639
£1,097,247
£987,095
£9,715,824
£5,633,679
£8,638,764
£6,135,786
£7,865,815
£5,945,810
£6,980,322
£3,190,703
£2,197,908
£2,551,535
£1,675,852
£1,986,759
£1,968,120
£1,770,542
£12,906,527
£7,831,587
£11,190,299
£7,811,638
£9,852,574
£7,913,930
£8,750,864
-£3,369,540
-£2,225,849
-£1,849,128
-£1,916,640
-£1,493,554
-£1,745,888
-£2,740,820
£9,536,987
£5,605,737
£9,341,171
£5,894,999
£8,359,020
£6,168,042
£6,010,044
£8,553,000
£50,916,000
£15,341,419
£66,257,419
-£15,341,419
£50,916,000
Net Difference
Marginal Basis SOS payment to each borough compared to the share of the costs that
each borough must pay towards the SOS payments for each borough (including
themselves)
Barnet
Camden
Enfield
Hackney
Haringey
Islington
Waltham F
£178,837 £2,668,744 -£482,741 -£560,411 -£368,079 -£436,365 -£432,272
-£388,876
£27,942 -£462,931 £1,906,960 -£370,196 -£243,145 -£288,254 -£285,550
-£256,884
-£702,407 -£384,581 -£264,918 £1,541,587 -£201,993 -£239,468 -£237,221
-£213,406
£240,788 -£398,622 -£274,590 -£318,769 £1,707,272 -£248,211 -£245,882
-£221,198
-£493,205 -£310,629 -£213,976 -£248,403 -£163,152 £1,300,134 -£191,605
-£172,370
-£222,232 -£363,109 -£250,127 -£290,370 -£190,716 -£226,098 £1,521,912
-£201,492
£970,278 -£570,035 -£392,667 -£455,844 -£299,399 -£354,944 -£351,614 £2,424,504
£0
£178,837
£27,942
-£702,407
£240,788
-£493,205
-£222,232
£970,278
2010/11 C-Tax will
be used
APPENDIX 5.1
SOS Payments for 2010-11 - Authority Meeting June 09
Date:
Reduced Tonnes from Camden in 2010/11 and no Tonnes from Enfield
Plus new MRF contract
Analysis of Effects of SOS Payments 2010-11
A)
14-Jun-09
For recyclable wastes as projected to be delivered to NLWA in 2010/11
TOTAL
Band D Equivalent properties:
2009/10
COUNCIL
TAX BASE
BARNET
CAMDEN
ENFIELD
HACKNEY
HARINGEY
ISLINGTON
WALTHAM F
BOROUGH %
NLWA C-TAX
BASE
PROVISIONAL
2008/09
HOUSEHOLD
TONNAGES
TONNAGE
ELEMENT
COUNCILTAX
ELEMENT
LEVY
Without any SOS
payment
Levy Share for
SoS Budget
Revised Levy Due
Value of SoS
Payments
Net Cost to
Borough
Net Difference
136,605
94,100
109,240
71,749
85,060
84,262
75,803
20.80%
14.33%
16.63%
10.92%
12.95%
12.83%
11.54%
117,890
65,478
107,185
77,259
100,381
72,017
89,019
£7,936,974
£4,408,323
£7,216,257
£5,201,482
£6,758,176
£4,848,563
£5,993,226
£1,778,850
£1,225,356
£1,422,507
£934,305
£1,107,639
£1,097,247
£987,095
£9,715,824
£5,633,679
£8,638,764
£6,135,786
£7,865,815
£5,945,810
£6,980,322
£990,275
£682,149
£791,901
£520,122
£616,616
£610,831
£549,510
£10,706,099
£6,315,828
£9,430,665
£6,655,908
£8,482,431
£6,556,641
£7,529,832
-£737,560
-£786,256
£0
-£441,144
-£1,159,244
-£952,463
-£684,738
£9,968,539
£5,529,572
£9,430,665
£6,214,765
£7,323,187
£5,604,178
£6,845,094
-£252,715
£104,107
-£791,901
-£78,978
£542,628
£341,632
£135,227
656,819
100.00%
629,229
£42,363,000
£8,553,000
£50,916,000
£4,761,404
£55,677,404
-£4,761,404
£50,916,000
-£0
2010/11 C-Tax
will be used
Marginal Basis SOS payment to each borough compared to the share of the costs that
each borough must pay towards the SOS payments for each borough (including
themselves)
Barnet
Camden
Enfield
Hackney
Haringey
Islington
Waltham F
£584,163 -£105,667 -£122,669
-£80,569
-£95,516
-£94,620
-£85,121
-£163,525
£673,612 -£130,768
-£85,888 -£101,822 -£100,867
-£90,741
£0
£0
£0
£0
£0
£0
£0
-£91,749
-£63,201
-£73,370
£392,954
-£57,129
-£56,593
-£50,912
-£241,099 -£166,081 -£192,802 -£126,632 £1,009,118 -£148,717
-£133,787
-£198,093 -£136,456 -£158,411 -£104,044 -£123,347
£830,273
-£109,923
-£142,412
-£98,100 -£113,883
-£74,799
-£88,676
-£87,844
£605,713
-£252,715
£104,107
-£791,901
-£78,978
£542,628
£341,632
£135,227
2010/11 C-Tax will
be used
B)
For all wastes to be collected for recycling by boroughs in 2010/11 - AS IF DELIVERED TO NLWA (ALTHOUGH NOT DONE AT PRESENT)
TOTAL
Band D Equivalent properties:
LEVY
PROVISIONAL
Without any SOS
Levy Share for
2008/09
payment
SoS Budget
Revised Levy Due
2009/10
BOROUGH %
TONNAGE
COUNCILTAX
COUNCIL
NLWA C-TAX
HOUSEHOLD
ELEMENT
ELEMENT
TAX BASE
BASE
TONNAGES
BARNET
CAMDEN
ENFIELD
HACKNEY
HARINGEY
ISLINGTON
WALTHAM F
Value of SoS
Payments
Net Cost to
Borough
136,605
94,100
109,240
71,749
85,060
84,262
75,803
20.80%
14.33%
16.63%
10.92%
12.95%
12.83%
11.54%
117,890
65,478
107,185
77,259
100,381
72,017
89,019
£7,936,974
£4,408,323
£7,216,257
£5,201,482
£6,758,176
£4,848,563
£5,993,226
£1,778,850
£1,225,356
£1,422,507
£934,305
£1,107,639
£1,097,247
£987,095
£9,715,824
£5,633,679
£8,638,764
£6,135,786
£7,865,815
£5,945,810
£6,980,322
£3,190,703
£2,197,908
£2,551,535
£1,675,852
£1,986,759
£1,968,120
£1,770,542
£12,906,527
£7,831,587
£11,190,299
£7,811,638
£9,852,574
£7,913,930
£8,750,864
-£3,369,540
-£2,225,849
-£1,849,128
-£1,916,640
-£1,493,554
-£1,745,888
-£2,740,820
£9,536,987
£5,605,737
£9,341,171
£5,894,999
£8,359,020
£6,168,042
£6,010,044
656,819
100.00%
629,229
£42,363,000
£8,553,000
£50,916,000
£15,341,419
£66,257,419
-£15,341,419
£50,916,000
Net Difference
Marginal Basis SOS payment to each borough compared to the share of the costs that
each borough must pay towards the SOS payments for each borough (including
themselves)
Barnet
Camden
Enfield
Hackney
Haringey
Islington
Waltham F
£178,837 £2,668,744 -£482,741 -£560,411 -£368,079 -£436,365 -£432,272
-£388,876
£27,942 -£462,931 £1,906,960 -£370,196 -£243,145 -£288,254 -£285,550
-£256,884
-£702,407 -£384,581 -£264,918 £1,541,587 -£201,993 -£239,468 -£237,221
-£213,406
£240,788 -£398,622 -£274,590 -£318,769 £1,707,272 -£248,211 -£245,882
-£221,198
-£493,205 -£310,629 -£213,976 -£248,403 -£163,152 £1,300,134 -£191,605
-£172,370
-£222,232 -£363,109 -£250,127 -£290,370 -£190,716 -£226,098 £1,521,912
-£201,492
£970,278 -£570,035 -£392,667 -£455,844 -£299,399 -£354,944 -£351,614 £2,424,504
£0
£178,837
£27,942
-£702,407
£240,788
-£493,205
-£222,232
£970,278
APPENDIX 5.2
SOS Effects Summary for Authority Meeting June 09
Year to Year Effects of SOS Payments 2007-08 to 2010/11
A)
For recyclable wastes as delivered to NLWA following current patterns
If Enfield
manage own
tonnages
2010/11
Net Financial Impact on Boroughs, Year to Year
2007/08
BARNET
CAMDEN
ENFIELD
HACKNEY
HARINGEY
ISLINGTON
WALTHAM F
B)
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
-£78,350
-£22,789
-£74,069
-£33,365
£97,086
£158,027
-£46,539
-£221,120
-£51,912
£121,939
-£54,936
£69,441
£117,830
£18,759
-£537,203
£4,945
£193,913
-£170,028
£275,566
£267,535
-£34,727
-£521,030
-£80,721
£283,635
-£219,905
£375,556
£176,127
-£13,662
-£252,715
£104,107
-£791,901
-£78,978
£542,628
£341,632
£135,227
-£0
-£0
-£0
-£0
-£0
For all wastes collected for recycling by boroughs - AS IF DELIVERED TO NLWA
(ALTHOUGH NOT DONE AT PRESENT)
If Enfield
manage own
tonnages
2010/11
Net Financial Impact on Boroughs, Year to Year
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
BARNET
CAMDEN
ENFIELD
HACKNEY
HARINGEY
ISLINGTON
WALTHAM F
£540,699
-£433,255
-£591,162
£290,818
-£465,890
-£453,838
£1,112,627
£712,783
-£287,404
-£436,317
£184,117
-£602,166
-£501,927
£930,913
£218,224
-£136,383
-£499,247
£251,035
-£371,622
-£357,566
£895,559
£178,837
£27,942
-£702,407
£240,788
-£493,205
-£222,232
£970,278
£178,837
£27,942
-£702,407
£240,788
-£493,205
-£222,232
£970,278
£0
£0
-£0
£0
£0
APPENDIX 6
Report Ends
This is correctly
the same.