Ethics and Trusteeship in Catholic Health Care Goal of talk: Boards know they have an ethical role; however, they are unsure of what to look for, and how best to carry out that responsibility. This talk will provide an overview of the issues and tools to use. 1) It is important to all of us that not-for-profits be governed well. Hospitals deal with the most fundamental matters of human well being and their services are not just another commodity in the marketplace. Even though trustees are volunteers (and they are strictly not a profession) they are very much like a profession with roles and responsibilities like any other profession. Reflection on the ethics of the role and responsibilities can be used to facilitate, assist and enable already virtuous people to make hard choices. As we will see the ethics of trustees is not about right answers but about striving to do the right thing for the right reasons. The trustees rightly ask what are the ethical elements that I need to be aware of? What tools in ethic can help me do my job better? I will examine: What Trustees identify as “their ethical issues” Trustee’s role and how it creates unique ethical quandaries The responsibilities and what principles should guide them. The tools that are necessary to “navigate the ship”; how will you know when you have fulfilled the ethical obligations of trusteeship 2) Why is this an issue now? Shifts in governance. With fewer religious and with a need to form lay leaders to assume responsibilities for the “ministry of the church” there needs to be a greater understanding of the moral tradition that informs the mission. Traditionally people looked to the “professional religious” to confirm the moral compass. . Changing responsibilities. In the past trustee’ primary concerns were the selection of the CEO and philanthropy, but that is changing. Now trustees are being asked to make critical decisions that relate to their institutions core values, and sometimes it very existence. Several important developments for governance structures especially cost containment prospective payments have reduced reimbursement, short length of stay, competition, bed supply have threatened the ability of hospital to pursue mission-related activities. Also hospitals have become the site of many complex moral choices including life, death, and healthcare decisionmaking. 1 Changing external environment: the Enron Tyco directors who seemed to be asleep at the wheel. While cases like these unfortunately focus on fraud and abuse as central issues in ethics (and they are not). These scandals have prompted trustees to ask what more should they be looking for? How can they better carry out their ethical oversight? 3) What is the ethics of trusteeship? Normally people conjure up images of scandal, abuse of power, misconduct and the like, think of flagrant wrongdoing. This is not the place to begin a productive conversation about hospital trustee ethics Ethics provides standards and rules for conduct; it interprets and clarifies fundamental values, virtues, and principles that have proven themselves over the centuries to be reasonable and beneficial to humankind. The study of trustee ethics has to do with the study of people who have been placed in significant power and responsibility. Ethics in this case is the study of how such power is used, how human beings should live together to mutual advantage, and the boundaries that people should not transgress in their relationships with one another The most important part of trustee ethics is that trustee decisions are not made alone but collectively. Trustee ethics requires not only attention to those how they fill the roles but also the way the trustees act collectively. If trustee governance is to fill its high standards of ethical conduct, then it is not enough to appeal to the ethical standards and consciences of individuals. A story about ethics trustees should start at the power and authority of trustees. There needs to be some agreed upon standard because without such a standard if the powers and authority of trustees is shifting, ambiguous, and inconsistently applied, this is a recipe for irresponsible conduct and lack of ethical accountability 4) Research indicates the common substantive ethical problems are: o Institutional autonomy: Concern about maintaining a mission in the face of fiscal pressures o Financial issues: reducing costs is seen as the origin of many ethical concerns o Positioning of the hospital: how should the hospital respond to turbulence in the health care environment o Facility enhancement: enhancing quality, meeting unmet needs, and finding the needed capital o Physician relations: dealing with physician-related quality issues, credentialing, and retaining physicians o Managerial issues: strengthening and diversifying management teams and the board o Quality of services: concretely improving patient satisfaction and getting board meaningfully involved with quality. 2 o Community role: how to bring together all the constituents to meet community needs. o Point: This qualitative information does not exhaust the list of substantive issues that trustees thought were “ethical”; but they should be weather bells/warnings that when an issues falls into areas there need to be a four point ethics check. (which will be discussed shortly) 5) The role of the board causes ethics quandaries: o The shifting responsibility from professional religious to lay people to carry on the ministry of the church has left lay trustees in a quandary about their obligation of “Catholic Identity”, how much formation they need. As religious congregations form lay persons to take over ministry of the Church there will be ambiguity of the roles. o Trustee as representative: trustees are generally not elected by specific constituents but as trustees are recruited to represent the diversity of the community are they “representing them: or “speaking for”, should trustees use their best personal judgment or make a decision that will be the most acceptable in the community o Trustees as mediators : unlike for-profit boards whose work is evaluated in terms of enhancing stockholders investments; non-profits work is ambiguous because they are evaluated in terms of meeting or mediating the needs of several stakeholder—the patient, the community, physicians o Assures community benefits: In smaller communities the meaning of community benefit is relatively clear—board members can learn how communities define their needs. However, in larger city it is difficult to establish the communities since service area differed according to type of service. Also when board members are not from the community and governance by outsiders becomes the norm, then community benefit must become an explicit conversation of the board o Delegates responsibility; for example, do board committees become problematical when it no longer serves responsible and competent governance. o Conflicting responsibility : what may be good for the community may be costly to the institution o Social versus economic values; board member often feel torn when decisions are made for reasons other than economic. Specific problems: o Conflicts of interest: when a trustee might personally benefit from his or her official actions and the benefits might bias judgments. Antidotes: recusal, disclosure o Board composition and deliberation: periodically the board should review the hospital’s mission, composition of the board, operating procedures and committee structure. Board deliberation 1. Do we have an open deliberative process? 2. Have we deliberated from a clear understanding of our mission? 3 3. Have we made explicit the principles on which are deliberations are based? 4. When principles come into conflict, have we weighed the merits of each? 5. Do we have a clear justification for balancing them in a particular way? 6. Do we have an appropriate procedure for determining a consensus? o Shared or federate trusteeship o Trustees on subsidiary boards o Relation to administration and staff: trustees collectively should safeguard internal policies and practices especially in three areas: 1. Quality of care: quality assurance, reduction of errors 2. Clinical decision making and patient care: patient’s rights 3. Human resource issues such as civil rights, discrimination employee relations and benefits. 6) Major ethical principles of trusteeships A sense of the ethical importance of trusteeship is suggested by the word trust Trustees have been entrusted with a mission and a set of assets. Those assets have been created by years of charitable work by the religious sponsors, private donation, public action (government / Hill-Burton) and the trustees are responsible for seeing that they serve the public interest in accord with the mission. Trustees, like the professions are to adhere to a standard above and beyond what is called for by ordinary morality in return for grants of power and prerogatives. o Fidelity to mission : fidelity means that trustees don’t perpetrate the past or resist change, rather they interpret the mission in light of changing circumstances and needs remaining true to the mission.(Mission = mission statement) o Trustees should use their authority and best efforts justly to promote the mission of the not-for-profit and keep that mission alive by interpreting its meaning over time in light of changing circumstances. o Service to patients: requires diligent oversight of hospital performance making sure that health is promoted in manifold ways, that policy and practices are in place to protect patient’s rights and autonomy, and to ensure that limited resources are efficiently utilized. o Trustees should ensure that high quality health care is provided to patients in an effective and ethical manner. o Service to community ; not just sectarian interest (for example, evangelization) but rather they are there to serve the common good—that individuals can not flourish and be fulfilled without attending to the structures that support it. Hospitals should deploy resources in ways that enhance the health and quality of life. 4 o Trustees should govern hospital policy and deploy hospital resources in ways that enhance health and the quality of life in the broader community that the hospital serves. o Institutional stewardship: they are concerned with interest greater than financial stewardship—but all the moral community. o Trustees should sustain and enhance the integrity of the hospital as an institution, as an effective organization for the delivery of high quality health care services, and a moral community of care giving. If these are the roles and principle of responsibility then how do they get applied? 7) To engage these issues there needs to be consideration of the following o Values based decision making process o Screens that arise out of the Catholic tradition and mission and should further assist in conducting an “adequate moral decision: 1. Social tradition 2. Ethical and Religious Directives 3. Mission and values 4. Strategic directions such as VIP 9) What informs trustee in VBD? Four point check Social tradition Principles of Catholic Social Teaching o Human Dignity: Everyone is worthy of respect o Respect for Human Life: From “Conception to natural death” o Association Person are not only sacred but social. People only grow in association o Participation o Preferential protection of poor and vulnerable o Solidarity o Stewardship o Subsidiarity: responsibility and limits on large bodies o Human Equality o Common Good: social conditions that allow people to reach their full human potential Ethical and Religious Directives Mission and Values Other programs Conclusions o Trustees have been given substantial authority and prerogatives and therefore they have substantial role and responsibility. o These roles and responsibilities are just beginning to be articulated and are rarely discussed among boards. 5 o All of trustee’s decisions are ethical even though they do not avert to it o They know they have made a “good decisions as long as values-based approach has been used (the four point check), one that raises question thought important screens that tell us who we are and where we are going. 6