A computerized Model Calculation of Emission Rate Coefficients involving a Transient Bonding State in Semiconductors A. ZEHE, A. RAMÍREZ and E. REYNOSO Facultad de Ciencias de la Electrónica Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Ciudad Universitaria, 72000 Puebla MÉXICO Keywords: - Bound donor-acceptor pair state, semiconductor, AUGER-molecule, emission quenching Abstract: - The effective Bohr radius of the donor electron in semiconductors extends over several interatomic distances, providing for a potential bonding with a neighboring donor state at both high doping and external excitation. Such a bound state has actually been identified in GaAlAs, which is formed of a close donor-acceptor molecule and a neighboring second donor and/or acceptor. The recombination behavior of such a bound state is best described by AUGER-type transitions, reason for which this state is called by us an AUGER molecule. The donor-acceptor pair radiation intensity is affected in a characteristic manner by the existence of the AUGER molecule state at elevated excitation levels and not too low temperatures. A computerized model calculation of corresponding rate coefficients turns out to be in good agreement with reported experimental results. 1 Introduction The existence of radiative luminescence transitions which carry crystal site information is well documented as Donor-Acceptor-Pair (DAP) radiation in bulk semiconductors [1]. Due to a dependence on R, the separation distance between pair forming donor and acceptor ions in real space, DAP transitions must reflect their mutual position and are still a widely studied phenomenon [2]. Quenching of the DAP luminescence, and at the same time an enhancement of the free-tobound (FB) luminescence was observed, when an electric field was applied to the sample during luminescence measurements [3]. The involvement of AUGER transitions is discussed, when emission bands are quenched [4]. Under the particular situation of highly doped and almost compensated semiconductors, a new kind of bound state may happen at high excitation levels which is formed of a close da-molecule and a neighboring second donor or acceptor. The de-excitation behavior of such a bound state resembles characteristics known from AUGER transitions, for this constellation is called an AUGER molecule. A three-body or AUGER type recombination is not unlikely to happen in direct energy-gap semiconductors, that is, quenching of the radiative recombination efficiency of the first transition, -often not simple to detect and to relate to this kind of non-radiative process. The DAP recombination, on the other hand, provides a means to dismantle the existence of AUGER molecules by virtue of the common intensity saturation and peak energy behavior of the main emission band. We present a study of the excitation of dda-AUGER molecule states in a direct-gap semiconductor host, and its effect on the external quantum efficiency of photon emission. 2 Transient bonding state An AUGER molecule in the here discussed context is a bound state between three interacting impurity atoms [d1d2a2] or [d1a1a2] within a crystalline semiconductor host, as shown in Fig. 1. The real-space arrangement of donor-acceptor molecules on substitution sites of the host lattice is also demonstrated. In the present case the donor of a close pair, formed of donor d1 and acceptor a1, separated by a distance R1 from each other, is situated near the donor of a distant pair (R2), formed of donor d2 and acceptor a2. The spatial separation distance R3 between the two donors is an important measure for the formation of the AUGER molecule. It is clear, that only highly doped (n-type in the here discussed case) and almost compensated semiconductors provide for such a situation. The expected relaxation processes after an external excitation are seen in Fig. 1(b). Given a relative closeness of d1 and d2, the otherwise radiative transition PDAM between d1 and a1 is quenched due to a nonradiative AUGER transition d1a1d2. As a consequence, an energetic electron is pushed into the CB, which after thermalization allows a transition PFB between the free electron and acceptor a2. acceptor molecule (DAM), the AUGER molecule (AM), and the conduction band-to-acceptor transition (FB). Additionally, a characteristic photon energy distribution of the recombination intensities can be expected. The recombination intensity I(R) of the DAP-radiation involves the pair distribution function, G(R), the probability of pair transitions, P(R), and the probability of pair occupation, F(R), respectively, being G(R) = 4R2N exp(-R3N4/3) (1) P(R) = P0 exp(2R/aB) (2) Figure 1: (a) The donor-acceptor molecules (DAM´s) d1a1 and d2a2 are separated by a distance R3 in the lattice on substitution sites of the crystal. R1 and R2 are corresponding donor-acceptor pair separation distances. The capture cross sections of a single DA molecule is proportional to the squared separation distance, R. (b) Radiative recombination transition PDAM and PFB, and non-radiative AUGER transition PAM. F(R) = vAgR2/[ vAgR2+ P0 exp(2R/aB)+X0f(g)] (3) Donor-acceptor molecules (DAM´s) with large pair separation R are occupied first at external excitation due to their large capture cross section R2. At a low external excitation rate, only common DAM-spectra of distant pairs are observed. There exist particular conditions of the pair distribution, and a situation can be build, where a distant and a close pair are situated at a separation distance R3 such, that once occupied, both pairs interact with each other. Indeed, at high excitation intensities, ever closer pairs are occupied, providing for the formation of a molecule consisting of the three components as shown in Fig. 1. Such a dda-excitation represents an AUGER molecule with a strongly increased probability for a three-body collision, involving two electrons and one hole. No net photon emission occurs, as the energy released by the recombination of the short living donor-acceptor molecule of close separation is immediately absorbed by the electron of the longer living distant pair, which is excited deep into the conduction band and then dissipates this energy by emitting phonons. This effect would be difficult to be proven by its own, though. Eq. (3) contains the action of the AUGER-transition, incorporated in F(R) as competing with the probability of pair occupation; X0 is the collision probability; gt D threshold excitation density, E12 is the energetic distance between the ground and the first excited donor state: 3 Recombination channels The [dda]-process leaves an occupied acceptor of the distant pair molecule behind, as well as an additional electron in the conduction band. A conduction band-toacceptor transition is likely to happen, with the consequence of a competing intensity between this now three recombination channels, that is the common donor- with N-majority impurity concentration, v-thermal carrier velocity, AR2-capture cross section, g-external excitation density, aB-BOHR's radius, T-lattice temperature. It is proportional to I(R) = R2 G(R) P(R) F(R) (4) X 0 ( R, T ) X ' exp( R / a B ) exp( E12D / kT ) (5) f ( g ) (1 exp( g / g t ) /(1 exp( g / g t ). (6) The latter exponential term in Eq. (5) is related to the bonding mechanism of the AUGER molecule. In analogy to the hydrogen molecule bonding provides the closeness of charged donors, once occupied, for their mutual bonding. At high impurity concentrations, the electron wave functions at the impurity level overlap. This interaction changes slightly the potential of each level, resulting in the formation of a band of states in the region of overlap. Its length E0 on an energy scale depends on the impurity concentration N, and is for ND=NA in GaAs approximately given by E0 = 7.7 meV (ND· 10-18 cm3). The otherwise discrete donor energy levels, taken in the picture of the hydrogen model as En = 13.6 eV · m*/mε2n2 broaden the more the closer the impurity atoms are packed in the crystal (m*-effective electron mass, ε-crystal lattice permittivity, n=1,2,3...). The latter aspect is important, when the temperature dependence is concerned. The thermal excitation of an electron from the ground state E1 to the first excited state E2 is more effective at higher temperatures at the one hand, but might even be operative under conditions, where the thermal energy kT is smaller than the distance (E2-E1) of the energy levels of the isolated donor atom. The requirement of spatial closeness of donors in order to interact can be relieved, if high external excitation densities come into play. Then both the ground energy state and the second energy level can be occupied. The by a factor of 4 larger BOHR radius of the E2-level allows more distant donors to interact. This makes E2 the bonding state of AUGER molecules and implies a characteristic temperature behavior. The probability of AUGER molecules to exist, say at liquid nitrogen temperature, is reduced considerably at helium temperature for the occupation probability of E2 levels are proportional to exp[-(E2-E1)/kT], which should be observed experimentally. The collision probability X0 is introduced as an analytical function. Their determination is an involved problem, as X0 depends in the first place on R3, but this in turn on the occupation function and the recombination probability of DAM´s, and thus finally on the excitation density g. Supposedly, the formation of AUGER molecules does not happen before the excitation density g runs over a threshold value gt, where close DAM´s in the vicinity of distant DAM´s are beginning to be occupied. 4 Recombination spectra Calculated transition spectra of DAP-radiation are shown in Fig. 2 (a). It is clearly seen, that for increasing excitation density both the line shape and peak position are modified corresponding to the changed pair occupation. Under the action of the AUGER-molecule at higher excitation levels, the integral intensity is reduced as consequence of the competing effect between radiative and non radiative transitions. Both spectral intensities are compared in Fig. 2(b). Donor-to-acceptor transitions are the dominant radiative recombination process and occur already at low excitation levels. The described intensity behavior of measured DAP-transition has previously been reported [5,6]. A single crystalline Ga1-xAlxAs host (x=0.8) was doped almost to compensation with silicon. Due to its amphoteric behavior, silicon forms both donors with Ed= 54 meV, and deep acceptors with EA200 meV. Cathodoluminescence of the samples was excited and the concentration of excited electrons and holes in the host was controlled by the current of a 30 keV primary electron beam. In the [dda]-AUGER molecule region, for any two donor-acceptor pairs, bound into the AUGER molecule and taken out of the radiative DAM- transition channel, one additional excess electron appears in the conduction band, and one additional neutral acceptor (see Fig. 1b) participates in a FBrecombination channel instead of the DAM-channel. Figure 2 (a): Donor-acceptor pair luminescence spectra in dependence on the excitation density. Excitation density g[cm3] is (1)- 1018; (2)- 1017; (3)- 1016; (4)- 1015; (5)- 1014; (6)1013. (b) Calculated integral intensities without (upper curve) and under participation of the AUGER molecule state (X' = 108 s-1), in dependence on the external excitation density g. The emission intensity in the latter case is strongly reduced. Both radiative transition channels have been reported to show a blue shift with increasing excitation density, which in any case confirms the participation of excited donor states in the radiative transition process. References [1] B. Guo, Z.R. Qui, K.S. Wong, Appl. Phys Letters 82, 2003, 2290 [2] A. Aydinli, M.N. Gasanly, A. Serpengüzel, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 14, 1999, 599 [3]A. Cesna, J. Kundrotas, A. Dargys, J. Luminescence, 78, 1998, 157 [4]A. Zehe, A. Ramirez, Theoret. Chemistry Acc.104, 2000, 331 [5]C. Wang, D. As, B. Schöttker, D. Schikora, K. Lischka, Semicond. Sci. Technol.14, 1999, 161 [6]T. Haensel, A. Zehe, "Competing Donor-Acceptor Pair Recombination in GaAlAs under Electron-Beam Excitation, Crystal Research and Technology 12, 1974, K 95