1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Arvind Singh
Isa Dookie
Vashtie Ramsaran
Katrina Rampaul
Lindell Sookdar
Vijay Jagassar
Kiel Hassanali
Anton joseph
Trevor Chandass
Marrisa Beharry
Nicole Manraj
Shane Aliasgar
Avinash Subit
Kristian Bernard
Ranelle Yorke
Levi Snagg
Ryan Pankar
Nicholas Low Foon
Jason Look Yee
Ryan Kalloo
Shiva Maharaj
Shiraz Mohammed
Khouler Khan
Ken Sooknanan
Arnold Ram
Sanjay Bahadoorsingh
Racquel Henry
Chad Legere
Otto Lezema
9
*Lauren Jones
*Marise Ramsaran
Dhanraj Ramsingh
Vanessa Rampersad
Roger Clarke
Alsen Henry
Shenelle Yearwood
Andronicus Williams
Jerome Ramesar
Jan Jerry
15
* - please confirm!
10
11
12
13
14
16
Pedro Browne
Ike Blanchard
Dwayne Persad
Winzey Bonair
Sasha Grant
Stephanie McFarlane
Keisha Mark
Chase Brown
Catherine Bolton
Ryan James
Sheldon Smith
Mikado Legister
Omar De Castro
Micheal Martin
Derrick Leslie
Sasha Perai
Curtis Boodoo
Zazat Mohammed
Jason Dhun
Ravi Tota-Maharaj
Sherwin Ragoonanan
Feraz Hosein
Masud Ali
Laura Bridgelal
*
Niel Williams
Tyrone Small
Kester Gabriel
Sherland Forde
Iyishla Campbell
Noel Paul
Ravi Beekham
Rishi Paryag
Clint Khan
Riyad Khan
Randy Roopchand
Shelley Kantasingh
Ricki Ramdatt
*Barry Harnanan
*Howard Spencer
Assessment of others is an important skill. You should take time to complete this assessment form,
forcing yourself to be objective and unbiased. Your responses will be kept confidential.
For each member of the group (except yourself), award a mark from 1 to 5 (or X if not applicable) for
your group-mate’s level of participation in each of the tasks identified on the chart on the back of this
sheet. The marking scheme considers both the quality of your peers’ work (hardware, software, report)
and the cooperative-ness of your peers (participation).
For Participation, consider things like:
• Did this person attend scheduled meetings / keep appointments?
• Did this person meet all assigned deadlines?
• Did this person accept constructive criticism and act on it?
• Did this person contribute and share ideas?
• Did this person do a fair share of the more tedious work
(i.e. photocopying, typing, formatting, testing, debugging etc.)?
The completed forms should be folded and returned either in person, or under the office door, anytime
up to the Tuesday following the submission deadline.
Marks reported by your group-mates will be added, and averaged to give you an individual mark
between 1 and 5. That individual mark will yield your 2% Contribution as shown below:
Under 1
0.0%
1 or above; less than 2
0.5%
2 or above; less than 3
1.0%
3 or above; less than 4
1.5%
4 or above
2.0%
Based on: SAMPLE PEER ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK
http://www.oaa.pdx.edu/CAE/FacultyFocus/spring96/bulman.html
Please use the following scale:
1 - did not contribute to this task even though a contribution was expected
2 - willing, but not very successful
3 - average, did the basic work successfully but no special effort
4 - above average, willing, able, successful, and made a special effort
5 - outstanding: extra effort, and critical to success of task
X - was not asked to contribute to that task
First Name
Surname
ID Number
Hardware
Software
Report
Participation
Name & ID# _________________________________________________ Group # ________________
Based on: SAMPLE PEER ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK
http://www.oaa.pdx.edu/CAE/FacultyFocus/spring96/bulman.html